Startseite 3D biomimetic scaffold’s dimensional accuracy: a crucial geometrical response for bone tissue engineering
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

3D biomimetic scaffold’s dimensional accuracy: a crucial geometrical response for bone tissue engineering

  • Siddhant Gade und Shashikant Vagge ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 30. Oktober 2023
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Additive manufacturing has emerged as a trending methodology for producing different simple to complex geometries in minimum lead time, which in turn gives better quality attributes when compared to conventional manufacturing procedures. Fabrication of polylactic acid-based porous scaffold prototypes by 3-dimensional printing has been extensively performed successfully by many researchers. The dimensional accuracy of the 3-dimensional printed part is a very crucial aspect of bone tissue engineering. Dimensional precision of 3-dimensional biomimetic scaffolds has been a response characteristic somehow less focused on by researchers, though it is essential as it acts as a stereotype for defect recuperation while consequently developing extracellular matrix and bone regeneration. The present paper fosters re-tuning the process parameters of a fused deposition modeling based 3-dimensional printer while considering the dimensional precision as a response parameter by the Taguchi optimization technique using a full factorial design L27 orthogonal array set of design of experiments. The crystallinity of the polylactic acid filament material was assessed using differential scanning calorimetry and X-ray diffraction. The thermal breakdown of filament material was investigated utilizing a thermogravimetric analyzer. According to Taguchi’s signal-to-noise ratios, the optimum values were 0.14 mm of layer thickness, 20 mm s−1 of printing speed, and 80 % of infill percentage. In order to justify the results, response surface methodology was employed. R-square values for Taguchi and the response surface models were 88.61 % and 68.71 %, respectively.


Corresponding author: Shashikant Vagge, Department of Metallurgy and Materials Sciences, College of Engineering, Pune (COEP) Shivajinagar, 411005, Pune, India, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

Authors like to thank Dr. Manisha Kulthe, Head of department of Metallurgy and Materials Science and Dr. Sudhir Agashe, Vice Chancellor of COEP Technological University, Pune.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: Siddhant Gade: Study, conception and design, data collection, analysis; Shashikant Vagge: Analysis, Interpretation of results, and manuscript preparation.

  3. Competing interests: Authors have no competing interests to declare.

  4. Research funding: None declared.

  5. Data availability: The raw data that supports the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Jimenez, M., Romero, L., Domnguez, I. A., del Mar Espinosa, M., Domnguez, M. HPC Complex. 2019, 30, 9656938. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9656938.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Bourell, D., Kruth, J. P., Ming, L., Levy, G., Rosen, D., Beese, A. M., Clare, A. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 66, 659–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.009.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Serra, T., Mateos-Timoneda, M. A., Planell, J. A., Navarro, M. Organogenesis 2013, 9, 239–244. https://doi.org/10.4161/org.26048.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Nikolovaa, M. P., Chavali, M. S. Bioact. Mater. 2019, 4, 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.10.005.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Akande, S. O. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 2015, 4, 196–202.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Nancharaiah, T., Raju, D. R., Raju, V. R. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. 2010, 1, 106–111.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Qattawi, A., Alrawi, B., Guzman, A. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 10, 791–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.079.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Wu, J. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 392, 062050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/392/6/062050.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Mofokeng, J. P., Luyt, A. S., Tabi, T., Kovacs, J. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2012, 25, 927–948. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705711423291.Suche in Google Scholar

10. John, R., Espera Jr, D. A. H., Chena, Q., Advincula, R. C. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 20, 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Wong, K. V., Hernandez, A. HPC ISRN Mech. Engg. 2012, 10, 208760. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/208760.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Sheoran, A. J., Kumar, H. Mater. Today: Proc. 2020, 21, 1659–1672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.296.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Sawai, D., Takahashi, K., Sasashige, A., Kanamoto, T., Hyon, S.-H. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 3601–3605. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma030050z.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Singh, N., Singh, S., Dash, D., Mohanty, A., Misra, M., Maiti, P. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 10163–10174. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4009042.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Asadi-Eydivand, M., Solati-Hashjin, M., Farzad, A., Osman, N. A. A. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2016, 37, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2015.06.005.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Chelladurai, S. J. S., Murugan, K., Ray, A. P., Upadhyaya, M., Narasimharaj, V., Gnanasekaran, S. Mater. Today: Proc. 2021, 37, 1301–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.466.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-06-06
Accepted: 2023-01-16
Published Online: 2023-10-30
Published in Print: 2023-10-27

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Additive manufacturing and allied technologies
  4. Original Papers
  5. Influence of process parameters on ageing and free vibration characteristics of fiber-reinforced polymer composites by fusion filament fabrication process
  6. 3D biomimetic scaffold’s dimensional accuracy: a crucial geometrical response for bone tissue engineering
  7. Investigation of mechanical and microstructure properties of metal inert gas based wire arc additive manufactured Inconel 600 superalloy
  8. Study on the influence of surface roughness on tensile and low-cycle fatigue behavior of electron beam melted Ti‐6Al‐4V
  9. Effect of tool pin profile on the heat generation model of the friction stir welding of aluminium alloy
  10. Effect of clamping position on the residual stress in wire arc additive manufacturing
  11. Effect of welding speed on butt joint quality of laser powder bed fusion AlSi10Mg parts welded using Nd:YAG laser
  12. Mechanical behaviour, microstructure and texture studies of wire arc additive manufactured 304L stainless steel
  13. Evolution of microstructure and properties of CoCrFeMnNi high entropy alloy fabricated by selective laser melting
  14. Effect of laser energy density on surface morphology, microstructure and mechanical behaviour of direct metal laser melted 17-4 PH stainless steel
  15. The influence of rheology in the fabrication of ceramic-based scaffold for bone tissue engineering
  16. Behaviour of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) structural profile columns under axial compression
  17. Desirability function analysis approach for optimization of fused deposition modelling process parameters
  18. Effect of robotic weaving motion on mechanical and microstructural characteristics of wire arc additively manufactured NiTi shape memory alloy
  19. Rapid tooling of composite aluminium filled epoxy mould for injection moulding of polypropylene parts with small protruded features
  20. Investigation of microstructural evolution in a hybrid additively manufactured steel bead
  21. Fused filament fabricated PEEK based polymer composites for orthopaedic implants: a review
  22. Design of fixture for ultrasonic assisted gas tungsten arc welding using an integrated approach
  23. Effect of post-processing treatment on 3D-printed polylactic acid parts: layer interfaces and mechanical properties
  24. Investigating the effect of input parameters on tool wear in incremental sheet metal forming
  25. Microstructural evolution and improved corrosion resistance of NiCrSiFeB coatings prepared by laser cladding
  26. Microstructure and electrochemical behaviour of laser clad stainless steel 410 substrate with stainless steel 420 particles
  27. News
  28. DGM – Deutsche Gesellschaft für Materialkunde
Heruntergeladen am 23.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijmr-2022-0267/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen