Abstract
The present work aims to model the three-dimensional heat transfer coupled with the material flow model of 7075-T6 aluminium alloy material using the three tool pin profiles, square, pentagon, and hexagon, in the friction stir welding process. The temperature rise and fluid flow behaviour from the top to the bottom of the tool were evaluated. Also, the strain rate and dynamic viscosity variation were found near the tool pin and shoulder region. The results showed that the frictional contact heat between the shoulder surface and workpiece was responsible for the maximum heat generation. The probe area was minimum in the square tool pin geometry, which results in high heat generation due to the maximum shoulder surface contact area with the workpiece model. Furthermore, the analytical formula for calculating the heat generation on the tool shoulder/workpiece interface and the tool pin/workpiece contact region were also evaluated. The numerical modelling of heat generation was evaluated by COMSOL Multiphysics V5.3a software.
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: The author Dr. Murshid Imam acknowledges DST, SERB, the Government of India funding support for this work.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Aval, H. J. Mater. Des. 2015, 67, 413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.055.Search in Google Scholar
2. Panda, S. S. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2021, 35, 454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.07.009.Search in Google Scholar
3. Kah, P., Rajan, R., Martikainen, J., Suoranta, R. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Eng. 2015, 10, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40712-015-0053-8.Search in Google Scholar
4. Anshari, M. A. A., Imam, M., Yusufzai, M. Z. K., Chinthapenta, V., Mishra, R. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2021, 805, 140582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.140582.Search in Google Scholar
5. Anshari, M. A. A., Pandit, D., Imam, M. Mater. Today: Proc. 2022, 56, 862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.515.Search in Google Scholar
6. Jha, K. K., Ansari, M. A. A. Mater. Today: Proc. 2022, 56, 722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.320.Search in Google Scholar
7. Kesharwani, R., Imam, M., Sarkar, C. Manuf. Lett. 2020, 24, 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2020.04.008.Search in Google Scholar
8. Kesharwani, R., Imam, M., Sarkar, C. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 2021, 74, 3185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-021-02386-4.Search in Google Scholar
9. Jha, K. K., Kesharwani, R., Imam, M. Mater. Today: Proc. 2022, 56, 819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.262.Search in Google Scholar
10. Kesharwani, R., Jha, K. K., Sarkar, C., Imam, M. Mater. Today: Proc. 2022, 56, 826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.295.Search in Google Scholar
11. Raturi, M., Garg, A., Bhattacharya, A. Eng. Failure Anal. 2019, 96, 570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.12.003.Search in Google Scholar
12. Garg, A., Raturi, M., Bhattacharya, A. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2020, 29, 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.03.001.Search in Google Scholar
13. Ilangovan, M., Boopathy, S. R., Balasubramanian, V. Def. Technol. 2015, 11, 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2015.01.004.Search in Google Scholar
14. Patel, V. V., Badheka, V., Kumar, A. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2017, 240, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.09.009.Search in Google Scholar
15. Mugada, K. K., Adepu, K. J. Manuf. Process. 2018, 32, 625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.03.034.Search in Google Scholar
16. Biswas, P., Kumar, D. A., Mandal, N. R. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B 2012, 226, 641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405411424111.Search in Google Scholar
17. Chen, G. Q., Shi, Q. Y., Li, Y. J., Sun, Y. J., Dai, Q. L., Jia, J. Y., Zhu, Y. C., Wu, J. J. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2013, 79, 540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.07.004.Search in Google Scholar
18. Song, M., Kovacevic, R. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2003, 43, 605. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00022-1.Search in Google Scholar
19. Song, M., Kovacevic, R. R. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B 2003, 217, 73. https://doi.org/10.1243/095440503762502297.Search in Google Scholar
20. Sadeghian, B., Taherizadeh, A., Atapour, M. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2018, 259, 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.04.012.Search in Google Scholar
21. Nandan, R., Roy, G. G., Debroy, T. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2006, 37, 1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-006-1076-9.Search in Google Scholar
22. Grujicic, M., He, T., Arakere, G., Yalavarthy, H. V., Yen, C. F., Cheeseman, B. A. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B 2010, 224, 609. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM1750.Search in Google Scholar
23. Gadakh, V. S., Adepu, K. K. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2013, 2, 370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2013.10.003.Search in Google Scholar
24. Hamilton, C., Kopyściański, M., Senkov, O., Dymek, S. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2013, 44, 1730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-012-1512-y.Search in Google Scholar
25. Malika, V., Sanjeev, N. K. B., Hebbarb, H. S., Kailas, S. V. 12th GCMM, Vol. 97; Elsevier Procedia: Vellore, 2014; p. 1060.10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.384Search in Google Scholar
26. Bayazid, S. M., Farhangi, H., Ghahramani, A. Procedia Mater. Sci. 2015, 11, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2015.11.013.Search in Google Scholar
27. Su, H., Wu, C. S., Bachmann, M., Rethmeier, M. Mater. Des. 2015, 77, 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.04.012.Search in Google Scholar
28. Mehta, M., Reddy, G. M., Rao, A. V., De, A. Def. Technol. 2015, 11, 229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2015.05.001.Search in Google Scholar
29. Yaduwanshi, D. K., Bag, S., Pal, S. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B 2015, 229, 1722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405414539297.Search in Google Scholar
30. Mohanty, H., Mahapatra, M. M., Kumar, P., Biswas, P., Mandal, N. R. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B 2012, 226, 1527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405412451811.Search in Google Scholar
31. Jha, K. K., Kesharwani, R., Imam, M. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 2022, 76, 1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-022-02672-9.Search in Google Scholar
32. Fiedler, T., Belova, I. V., Öchsner, A., Murch, G. E. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2009, 45, 434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.10.021.Search in Google Scholar
33. Gadakh, V. S., Kumar, A., Patil, G. J. V. Weld. J. 2015, 93, 115.Search in Google Scholar
34. Woźnicki, A., Leszczyńska-Madej, B., Włoch, G., Grzyb, J., Madura, J., Leśniak, D. Metals 2021, 11, 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11020338.Search in Google Scholar
35. Tello, K. E., Gerlich, A. P., Mendez, P. F. Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining 2010, 15, 260. https://doi.org/10.1179/136217110X12665778348380.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Additive manufacturing and allied technologies
- Original Papers
- Influence of process parameters on ageing and free vibration characteristics of fiber-reinforced polymer composites by fusion filament fabrication process
- 3D biomimetic scaffold’s dimensional accuracy: a crucial geometrical response for bone tissue engineering
- Investigation of mechanical and microstructure properties of metal inert gas based wire arc additive manufactured Inconel 600 superalloy
- Study on the influence of surface roughness on tensile and low-cycle fatigue behavior of electron beam melted Ti‐6Al‐4V
- Effect of tool pin profile on the heat generation model of the friction stir welding of aluminium alloy
- Effect of clamping position on the residual stress in wire arc additive manufacturing
- Effect of welding speed on butt joint quality of laser powder bed fusion AlSi10Mg parts welded using Nd:YAG laser
- Mechanical behaviour, microstructure and texture studies of wire arc additive manufactured 304L stainless steel
- Evolution of microstructure and properties of CoCrFeMnNi high entropy alloy fabricated by selective laser melting
- Effect of laser energy density on surface morphology, microstructure and mechanical behaviour of direct metal laser melted 17-4 PH stainless steel
- The influence of rheology in the fabrication of ceramic-based scaffold for bone tissue engineering
- Behaviour of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) structural profile columns under axial compression
- Desirability function analysis approach for optimization of fused deposition modelling process parameters
- Effect of robotic weaving motion on mechanical and microstructural characteristics of wire arc additively manufactured NiTi shape memory alloy
- Rapid tooling of composite aluminium filled epoxy mould for injection moulding of polypropylene parts with small protruded features
- Investigation of microstructural evolution in a hybrid additively manufactured steel bead
- Fused filament fabricated PEEK based polymer composites for orthopaedic implants: a review
- Design of fixture for ultrasonic assisted gas tungsten arc welding using an integrated approach
- Effect of post-processing treatment on 3D-printed polylactic acid parts: layer interfaces and mechanical properties
- Investigating the effect of input parameters on tool wear in incremental sheet metal forming
- Microstructural evolution and improved corrosion resistance of NiCrSiFeB coatings prepared by laser cladding
- Microstructure and electrochemical behaviour of laser clad stainless steel 410 substrate with stainless steel 420 particles
- News
- DGM – Deutsche Gesellschaft für Materialkunde
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Additive manufacturing and allied technologies
- Original Papers
- Influence of process parameters on ageing and free vibration characteristics of fiber-reinforced polymer composites by fusion filament fabrication process
- 3D biomimetic scaffold’s dimensional accuracy: a crucial geometrical response for bone tissue engineering
- Investigation of mechanical and microstructure properties of metal inert gas based wire arc additive manufactured Inconel 600 superalloy
- Study on the influence of surface roughness on tensile and low-cycle fatigue behavior of electron beam melted Ti‐6Al‐4V
- Effect of tool pin profile on the heat generation model of the friction stir welding of aluminium alloy
- Effect of clamping position on the residual stress in wire arc additive manufacturing
- Effect of welding speed on butt joint quality of laser powder bed fusion AlSi10Mg parts welded using Nd:YAG laser
- Mechanical behaviour, microstructure and texture studies of wire arc additive manufactured 304L stainless steel
- Evolution of microstructure and properties of CoCrFeMnNi high entropy alloy fabricated by selective laser melting
- Effect of laser energy density on surface morphology, microstructure and mechanical behaviour of direct metal laser melted 17-4 PH stainless steel
- The influence of rheology in the fabrication of ceramic-based scaffold for bone tissue engineering
- Behaviour of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) structural profile columns under axial compression
- Desirability function analysis approach for optimization of fused deposition modelling process parameters
- Effect of robotic weaving motion on mechanical and microstructural characteristics of wire arc additively manufactured NiTi shape memory alloy
- Rapid tooling of composite aluminium filled epoxy mould for injection moulding of polypropylene parts with small protruded features
- Investigation of microstructural evolution in a hybrid additively manufactured steel bead
- Fused filament fabricated PEEK based polymer composites for orthopaedic implants: a review
- Design of fixture for ultrasonic assisted gas tungsten arc welding using an integrated approach
- Effect of post-processing treatment on 3D-printed polylactic acid parts: layer interfaces and mechanical properties
- Investigating the effect of input parameters on tool wear in incremental sheet metal forming
- Microstructural evolution and improved corrosion resistance of NiCrSiFeB coatings prepared by laser cladding
- Microstructure and electrochemical behaviour of laser clad stainless steel 410 substrate with stainless steel 420 particles
- News
- DGM – Deutsche Gesellschaft für Materialkunde