Home Study on the influence of surface roughness on tensile and low-cycle fatigue behavior of electron beam melted Ti‐6Al‐4V
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Study on the influence of surface roughness on tensile and low-cycle fatigue behavior of electron beam melted Ti‐6Al‐4V

  • Dongye Yang ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Ke Si , Wenqi Tian and Xinqi Zhang
Published/Copyright: October 18, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Surface quality is a key factor in determining the mechanical performance of metallic materials. In this study, the influence of surface roughness on quasi-static mode tensile and low fatigue behavior of electron beam melted (EBMed) Ti‐6Al‐4V was studied. The results showed that the microstructure of the EBMed Ti‐6Al‐4V is mainly composed of α and β phases. It was found that the yield strength of the as-polished EBMed sample was about 200 MPa higher than the original EBMed sample, and the fatigue life was three times that. The fatigue crack initiation and propagation were explored, and it was found that the fatigue life was reduced on account of the thermal stress concentration that was generated as a result of the solidification shrinkage and the local stress concentration.


Corresponding author: Dongye Yang, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, 333 Longteng Road, Songjiang District, Shanghai 201620, P.R. China, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Liu, S., Shin, Y. C. Mater. Des. 2019, 164, 107552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.107552.Search in Google Scholar

2. Limmahakhun, S., Oloyede, A., Sitthiseripratip, K., Xiao, Y., Yan, C. Addit. Manuf. 2017, 15, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.03.010.Search in Google Scholar

3. Dobbelstein, H., Gurevich, E. L., George, E. P., Ostendorf, A., Laplanche, G. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 24, 386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.008.Search in Google Scholar

4. Divya, V. D., Muñoz-Moreno, R., Messé, O. M. D. M., Barnard, J. S., Baker, S., Illston, T., Stone, H. J. Mater. Charact. 2016, 114, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2016.02.004.Search in Google Scholar

5. Agrawal, P., Thapliyal, S., Nene, S. S., Mishra, R. S., McWilliams, B. A., Cho, K. C. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 32, 101098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101098.Search in Google Scholar

6. Chen, K., Huang, R., Li, Y., Lin, S., Zhu, W., Tamura, N., Li, J., Shan, Z. W., Ma, E. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e1907164. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201907164.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Li, N., Huang, S., Zhang, G., Qin, R., Liu, W., Xiong, H., Shi, G., Blackburn, J. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2019, 35, 242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.002.Search in Google Scholar

8. Seede, R., Shoukr, D., Zhang, B., Whitt, A., Gibbons, S., Flater, P., Elwany, A., Arroyave, R., Karaman, I. Acta Mater. 2020, 186, 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.037.Search in Google Scholar

9. Dharmendra, C., Hadadzadeh, A., Amirkhiz, B. S., Lloyd, A., Mohammadi, M. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 2020, 771, 138652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.138652.Search in Google Scholar

10. Bai, C., Lan, L., Xin, R., Gao, S., He, B. Int. J. Fatigue 2022, 159, 106784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106784.Search in Google Scholar

11. Higashi, M., Yoshimi, K. Mater. Des. 2021, 209, 110010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110010.Search in Google Scholar

12. Yao, Y., Xing, C., Peng, H., Guo, H., Chen, B. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 2021, 802, 140629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.140629.Search in Google Scholar

13. Greitemeier, D., Dalle Donne, C., Syassen, F., Eufinger, J., Melz, T. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2016, 32, 629. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284715y.0000000053.Search in Google Scholar

14. Mian, M. J., Razmi, J., Ladani, L. Materialia 2021, 16, 101041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101041.Search in Google Scholar

15. Doğu, M. N., Esen, Z., Davut, K., Tan, E., Gümüş, B., Dericioglu, A. F. Mater. Charact. 2020, 168, 110549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110549.Search in Google Scholar

16. He, J., Liu, Y., Liu, C., Wang, Q., Ma, L. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 237, 032122. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/237/3/032122.Search in Google Scholar

17. Kujawski, D., Vasudevan, A., Sadananda, K. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2022, 269, 108528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108528.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-03-07
Accepted: 2022-06-23
Published Online: 2023-10-18
Published in Print: 2023-10-27

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Additive manufacturing and allied technologies
  4. Original Papers
  5. Influence of process parameters on ageing and free vibration characteristics of fiber-reinforced polymer composites by fusion filament fabrication process
  6. 3D biomimetic scaffold’s dimensional accuracy: a crucial geometrical response for bone tissue engineering
  7. Investigation of mechanical and microstructure properties of metal inert gas based wire arc additive manufactured Inconel 600 superalloy
  8. Study on the influence of surface roughness on tensile and low-cycle fatigue behavior of electron beam melted Ti‐6Al‐4V
  9. Effect of tool pin profile on the heat generation model of the friction stir welding of aluminium alloy
  10. Effect of clamping position on the residual stress in wire arc additive manufacturing
  11. Effect of welding speed on butt joint quality of laser powder bed fusion AlSi10Mg parts welded using Nd:YAG laser
  12. Mechanical behaviour, microstructure and texture studies of wire arc additive manufactured 304L stainless steel
  13. Evolution of microstructure and properties of CoCrFeMnNi high entropy alloy fabricated by selective laser melting
  14. Effect of laser energy density on surface morphology, microstructure and mechanical behaviour of direct metal laser melted 17-4 PH stainless steel
  15. The influence of rheology in the fabrication of ceramic-based scaffold for bone tissue engineering
  16. Behaviour of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) structural profile columns under axial compression
  17. Desirability function analysis approach for optimization of fused deposition modelling process parameters
  18. Effect of robotic weaving motion on mechanical and microstructural characteristics of wire arc additively manufactured NiTi shape memory alloy
  19. Rapid tooling of composite aluminium filled epoxy mould for injection moulding of polypropylene parts with small protruded features
  20. Investigation of microstructural evolution in a hybrid additively manufactured steel bead
  21. Fused filament fabricated PEEK based polymer composites for orthopaedic implants: a review
  22. Design of fixture for ultrasonic assisted gas tungsten arc welding using an integrated approach
  23. Effect of post-processing treatment on 3D-printed polylactic acid parts: layer interfaces and mechanical properties
  24. Investigating the effect of input parameters on tool wear in incremental sheet metal forming
  25. Microstructural evolution and improved corrosion resistance of NiCrSiFeB coatings prepared by laser cladding
  26. Microstructure and electrochemical behaviour of laser clad stainless steel 410 substrate with stainless steel 420 particles
  27. News
  28. DGM – Deutsche Gesellschaft für Materialkunde
Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijmr-2022-0131/html
Scroll to top button