Abstract
Variable stiffness design (VSD) has been paid more attention for its capability of further exploiting the potential of fiber-reinforced composite in composite structure design. VSD under different mechanical property indexes is reviewed in this paper. The review mostly focuses on strength, buckling, frequency, and other more common mechanical indices. Subsequently, the usage of VSD method for several years is briefly summarized. Some successful tests about variable stiffness composite parts are introduced and the experiment results are also addressed. The article summarizes the research situation from both perspectives based on a number of papers about the VSD of composite materials in recent years and provides theoretical reference and basic knowledge to new researchers.
1 Introduction
A popular type of advanced composite materials composed of fiber and resin matrix of high performance is one of the most widely used and important structural composites at present. In the past decades, fiber-reinforced composites mainly involved in carbon fiber-reinforced plastic polymer (CFRP) have been used diffusely in the field of aviation and aerospace as the primary load-carrying structure [1], [2]. These composites are attractive for various aerospace applications due to many characteristics, including lightweight and great strength, good performance of fatigue and corrosion resistance, and outstanding designability. In the conventional design process of CFRP composite materials, each layer of carbon fiber is placed to a certain thickness in a straight parallel pattern. Generally, 0°, ±45°, and 90° are adopted as the layer orientations. The symmetry of composite laminate is used to reduce the workload of design and construction, to avoid coupling of different layers, and to assimilate the properties of composite material structure to metal structure [3].
As shown in Figure 1, a typical composite laminate is stacked by a plurality of fiber layer of different directions. This old-fashioned method is widely adopted by the designers who have a thorough knowledge of metal structure design. The mechanical performances of this type of laminates are determined by the thickness and direction of each layer. Under the premise that the fiber orientation is consistent in each layer, the mechanical properties of composite material structure are realized by changing the angle of each layer [4], [5], [6] and stacking sequence [7], [8], [9], [10] in conventional design methods.

A typical laminated composite plate.
This old conservative design scheme can also significantly increase the mechanical properties of the component. However, in a macroscopic sense, the potential of CFRP composite materials is still not fully used due to their strong anisotropy. The designability and potentiality need to be harnessed further to reduce the mass and customize the mechanical properties of the structure. To this end, there are several design methods of composite lamination to be proposed as represented in Figure 2. The methods are as follows: (a) laminate with several overlapping patches [11], [12], (b) laminate with ply drop-off [13], [14], and (c) laminate with curvilinear fibers. In these methods, the use of curvilinear fibers to design the CFRP composite (Figure 2C) is a new technology developed with automated fiber placement (AFP) machine [15]. The CFRP composite structure is tailored by choosing diverse angles and positions of fiber placement. Compared to other methods, the variation of the fiber orientation promised the continuity of the carbon fiber at the maximum level and avoided the abrupt changes of the mechanical behaviors of the CFRP composite structure.

Three types of design methods for composite laminate.
(A) Laminate with several overlapping patches. (B) Laminate with ply drop-off. (C) Laminate with curvilinear fibers.
In the 1990s, Hyer et al. [16], [17], [18] first proposed that the structural performance of composite laminates with holes can be promoted using curvilinear fibers. Later, Tosh and Kelly [19], [20] verified the proposal by experimenting on laminated plates with hole in the middle. This significantly enlarged the design space and provided a new way of the structure optimization design of CFRP composite materials. This new design method termed as variable stiffness design (VSD), in which curves are employed as the fiber placement paths so that the fiber orientation of each layer can be freely designed, was born from the optimization design of the CFRP composite materials. The mechanical performance of the composite materials is directly determined by the direction of the fiber. Therefore, there is increasing interest to replace the traditional design method with VSD. More and more academicians and experts in the field of VSD put the focus on how to acquire the optimal orientation and put forward their own optimization schemes and have gotten ideal performance. For instance, the application of the variable stiffness method realizes the fuselage skin design for maximum failure load [21], the composite plate design for maximum buckling [22], and the composite cylinder under bending [23].
To get a good composite structure, a large number of design variables and manufacturing constraints need to be defined in the VSD resulting in the increase of design costs and the degree of research difficulty. To provide a theoretical reference for new researchers, the present work provides a comprehensive review on the mechanical properties and design methods of variable stiffness composite structure. The current state and research progress of VSD is introduced for researchers who are engaged in the related field.
2 VSD for mechanical properties
The great advantage of VSD is that the mechanical property indexes can be customized by tailoring fiber orientation. The basic mechanical properties include tension strength, buckling capacity, postbuckling strength, and fundamental frequency. In this section, the different design scenarios of each performance are summarized based on a number of papers about VSD of composite materials in recent years.
2.1 Design for maximum strength
For the necessity of the assembly and processing, numerous joints and cutouts were manufactured inevitably in the composite components. These regions of joints and cutouts were stress concentrated resulting a complicated stress state. Tailored fiber orientation displayed such tremendous potential to prevent stresses from concentrating and ensure the continuity of fibers [24], [25]. Tosh and Kelly [20] aligned the fiber orientation with principal stress vectors and load path in laminates, respectively, which improved the strength for a component with an open hole and a pin-loaded hole under tension. IJsselmuiden et al. [26] derived a series of equations for the conservative strength envelope that can be applied to formulate the strength- and stiffness-based designs of variable stiffness lamination. Based on this design method, panels under the binding force between axial and shear loads were designed for maximum strength and stiffness.
Khani et al. [27] investigated the design of variable stiffness panels to get the maximum strength. The lamination parameters [28] were considered as the design variable in process to ensure the largest design space and high-efficiency convergence. The maximum strength was defined as the minimization of critical failure index proposed as the reciprocal of safety factor. Finally, this design method was applied to a supported square panel with a center hole under tension and the simulations were performed to confirm the efficiency of the method. The numerical results show that this VSD method exhibited about three times improvement in strength about the quasi-isotropic design. Falcó et al. [29] used finite element analyses to simulate the first-ply failure of variable stiffness panels under tensile load. This analysis approach can be applied directly to the optimal design of fiber orientation to avoid tensile failure.
Legrand et al. [30] mentioned a design procedure to reduce concentration, which uses genetic algorithm to define the fiber orientation angles directly in each finite element of composite laminate. The quantity of meshed element decides the improvement extent of the accuracy and the continuity of the fiber trajectory. Therefore, this method has low efficiency because of the large number of analyses required to carry out. To achieve the maximum load-carrying capacity of the composite laminates with a central hole, Huang and Haftka [31] described a procedure for steering the fiber orientations around the hole in a single layer of a multilayer. The fiber angles are directly designated as the design variable. To avoid local convergence, the authors alternated the conjugate gradient Fletcher-Reeves method from DOT [32] and the genetic algorithm iteratively. The intention of this formulation is to use the genetic algorithm to move the optimization to a better region, and the conjugate gradient method is used to quickly converge to the local optimum in this region.
2.2 Design for buckling resistance
The buckling performance is often the primary design consideration of composite structures in aerospace applications and other fields. The VSD method provides the designer more tailoring options to scheme fiber orientations with desired buckling resistance. For example, Tatting and Gürdal [33] showed that up to 60% enhancement can be gained by the idea of curved fiber paths to design variable stiffness panels with a center hole for maximum buckling loads. Through defined stiffness variation over a structure domain, IJsselmuiden et al. [34] obtained the significant improvement in excess of 100% in buckling load-carrying capability of variable stiffness lamination under the simulation experiment condition.
Lund et al. [35] applied the discrete material optimization approach, which evolved from multiphase topology optimization [36], to design variable stiffness plates for maximum buckling load. The stacking sequence and fiber orientation are computed simultaneously using the gradient-based method. Based on numerical simulations, Lopes et al. [37] demonstrated the advantage of variable angle laminates with compressive buckling and first-ply failure. During their analysis, a smooth reference curve, as proposed by Tatting and Gürdal [33], is defined as the fiber path orientation. Wu et al. [22], [38] and Khani et al. [39] also presented the optimal design methods of buckling capacity of laminated composite. However, compared to the conventional composite design, the VSD method is more complicated because of the large number of variables with respect to design continuity and manufacturability. This is the reason why many literatures used a numerical simulation tool to verify their conclusions. Combining the manufacturing constraints [40], [41], Weaver et al. [42] used an embroidery tow-placed machine to manufacture the variable stiffness panels and test such plates. The test results show the postbuckling performance seriously improved relative to quasi-isotropic lamination.
To achieve the VSD of maximum buckling load, Setoodeh et al. [43] presented a generalized reciprocal approximation method. The fiber orientation angle is selected as the design parameter. The buckling load is expanded according to the inverse of the stiffness tensor. However, the design issue is changed into a nonconvex design problem because of using fiber angles as the design parameter. Hence, the outcome of the optimization design process is highly dependent on the starting fiber orientation angles. To solve this problem, IJsselmuiden et al. [34] attempted to change the design parameter to the lamination parameter in the following research. Thus, a conservative reciprocal approximation was created. The approximation scheme reproduces the homogeneity properties of the buckling factor and is convex. The analysis results showed that the yielding buckling load is significantly improved with respect to quasi-isotropic laminates.
2.3 Design for postbuckling capacity
Various experimental results demonstrated that bearing capacity of the thin-shell component for composite materials beyond initial buckling under axial compression load. They could sustain load in a postbuckling state without being broken down, which offers the potential of even lighter structures than are currently used on the new generation of composite passenger aircraft [44], [45]. The VSD method can significantly increase the postbuckling performance, which was early confirmed by Wu et al. [46]. To more accurately predict the postbuckling capacity of variable stiffness panels, Lopes et al. [47] considered the effect of the residual thermal stresses that arise from the curing process in the analysis process. The predicted results compared well to the experimental results. In addition, the tow-steered design embodied more tolerance to traditional design according to the experimental data.
Based on stress function and transverse displacement, Raju et al. [48] presented a comparatively new method that is known as the differential quadrature method (DQM). This method was proposed to solve the postbuckling analysis of variable stiffness plates under axial compression. Afterwards, Raju et al. [49] presented an asymptotic numerical method that transforms the nonlinear problem into a set of well-posed recursive linear problems. This approach was then successfully implemented using a generalized differential-integral quadrature method to solve the nonlinear postbuckling problem of variable stiffness laminates. A similar approach was adopted by White et al. [50], who made a successful application of this method into the postbuckling analysis of variable stiffness cylindrical shell. White et al. [51] further investigated the postbuckling performance of two variable stiffness cylindrical shells with the tow overlapping and the dropped to avoid overlapping under axial compression. The specimen models were analyzed by finite element method in both linear and nonlinear ways. Moreover, the results were compared to experimental results.
Using Koiter’s asymptotic theory and the methods of generalized differential and integral quadrature, White and Weaver [52] constructed an efficient model of panel’s postbuckling. The tangent stiffness of the variable stiffness panel’s postbuckling model was maximized with a genetic algorithm. Besides, they also said that multiobjective VSD, in which the performance such as stiffness and strength were taken into consideration, would be realized while the external forces exist. Wu et al. [53], [54] presented an optimization strategy using a genetic algorithm for the design of postbuckling performance of variable stiffness plates. To illustrate the superiority of the variable stiffness plates, they compared the simulation results to an optimal straight fiber plate.
2.4 Design for maximum fundamental frequency
Fundamental frequency is one of the key factors that affect the dynamic performance of composite structure and has a direct influence on the performance and service life of the designed parts. One of the earliest applications of a variable stiffness concept to improve the vibration performance of composite plates was reported by Leissa and Martin [55]. Moreover, the numerical results showed that using nonuniformly spaced fibers could improve the fundamental frequency by as much as 21%.
To achieve the maximum fundamental frequency, Honda et al. [56] introduced a new vibration design method of variable stiffness plates based on the Ritz energy methodology. The Ritz energy method was applied to determine the frequency parameters of the plates. The results of design were compared to the traditional plates with parallel fibers to show its superiority. Honda and Narita [57] also suggested steering the fibers to the direction of the projections of contour lines for the cubic surfaces. For determining fiber orientation, the parameters of the cubic polynomial surfaces were defined as design variables.
The research on the design of composite conical shell for maximum fundamental frequency was carried out by Blom et al. [58]. They designed conical shells using curvilinear fibers for maximizing fundamental frequencies, and manufacturing constraints were taken into account in the process. Luersen et al. [59] presented a design method of variable stiffness cylindrical shell for maximum fundamental frequency using a surrogate method to optimize the fiber path parameters. The maximization of the fundamental frequency of the shell was studied for three different boundary conditions including clamped-free, clamped-clamped, and pinned-pinned edges.
Akhavan and Ribeiro [60] proposed a new p-version finite element model that can ensure that the fiber curvature does not exceed the maximum value and the fiber orientation changes linearly based on the third-order shear deformation theory. It is also found that the mode shape can be changed using the VSD method, which can increase or decrease the natural frequency significantly. In a later research [61], with the same model and method, the relationship between fiber angle and deflections and normal and transverse stresses was studied. The effect of fiber angle changes on the mode shape and natural frequency were investigated by Ribeiro and Akhavan [62] based on same element model. It was found that the effect of the variation of fiber orientation on the higher-order mode was more severe than the first-order mode. Linear and nonlinear vibration and the variation of fiber orientation may lead to different dynamic behaviors and may behave in a more rigid pattern in a few cases.
2.5 Minimized weight or thickness
To lower the structural weight, composites are widely used in aerospace structures. Therefore, some researchers selected the weight and thickness as the design target directly. Blom et al. [63] used a series of polynomial and trigonometric functions to present a concept of streamline analogy, which can be successfully used to show the thickness distribution in variable fiber angle design. It realized the fiber orientation angle design for minimizing the maximum ply thickness, maximizing surface smoothness or combining these objectives.
Parnas et al. [64] presented an approximate methodology for the design of laminated composites with curvilinear tow to minimize the weight. They used the cubic Bezier curves and bicubic Bezier surfaces to formulate fiber angles and layer thicknesses, respectively. The total weight of the composite structure was selected to be optimal objective. The Tsai-Hill criterion was used for the failure analysis on the first ply. The result testified that the removal of straight-fiber restriction would provide increased flexibility to the designer and yield a lighter design, as the design space was enlarged.
2.6 Multiple-property simultaneous design
Some researchers tried to consider multiple properties simultaneously in the scheme of VSD and achieved the scheme using the multiobjective optimization theory. Honda et al. [65] used a multiobjective optimization approach to define the curvilinear fiber shapes in variable stiffness plates. Two mechanical properties were considered as the objective function. They included the in-plane strength represented by the Tsai-Wu failure index and the natural frequency of the panel. The numerical simulation showed that the two mechanical properties of the designed plate were higher than the plates with straight fibers. Alhajahmad et al. [66] applied the variable stiffness concept to the design of fuselage panel. They optimized the fiber orientation for maximum buckling loads and maximum failure loads.
Nik et al. [67] maximized simultaneously the in-plane stiffness and buckling resistance using a hybrid approach combing the polynomial regression and the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) [68] for the VSD of composite laminate. The approach of polynomial regression was chosen because it can simplify the analysis model for constructing a surrogate model. NSGA-II was a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm that is used to quickly find a set of much better distributed solutions and better convergence to a multiobjective optimization problem [69]. The results of numerical simulation demonstrate that this hybrid algorithm converges faster than the traditional genetic algorithm and the curvilinear fiber trajectory can increase both buckling load and stiffness simultaneously higher than the quasi-isotropic. In the poststudy [70], the buckling load of four different sizes of variable stiffness laminate was researched. The final result shows that the buckling capability of variable stiffness laminate could be reduced, as the laminate sizes are smaller than the minimum turning radius of fiber placement.
2.7 Design for other performance
Besides the above-mentioned mechanical performance, there were other performances that had been considered in VSD. For instance, Setoodeh and Gürdal [71] used the strain energy criterion to establish the design conditions for fiber orientation. They thought that an optimum solution was achieved when the strain energy was at a minimum. In the literature [72], [73], they presented the minimum compliance design of variable stiffness panels using fiber orientation as continuous spatial design variables. Later, to improve the efficient computation of laminate design, they [74] used lamination parameters as the design variables instead of the fiber orientation to perform VSD under in-plane and out-of-plane loadings.
Stodieck et al. [75] analyzed the influence of different layer orientations on the aeroelastic behavior using an idealized composite wing model as the research object. The results proved that the variable angle design could bring positive impact on such performance as the divergence speed, flutter speed, and gust response. The maximum shear, bending, and torsion loads were reduced by 18%, 29%, and 16%, respectively, using a variable stiffness laminate rather than a standard traditional laminate.
The multistable composite has attracted more people’s attention in recent years because it can be used to make simple, reliable, and lightweight deployable structure and widely used in aerospace vehicle design and manufacturing. Applying the concept of variable angle to the design of multistable structure to ensure the continuity of the fiber can impart additional structural strength meanwhile. Panesar et al. [76], [77] presented an approach to develop a bistable finite element model that can be used for VSD. The model can accurately predict the cured shape of variable stiffness laminates. In a later research [78], thermally induced laminates were studied to further promote blended bistable laminates for morphing flap application. Sousa et al. [79] also carried out a research on the bistable variable stiffness composite laminates. They analyzed the geometry of the curing shapes obtained with morphing laminates as well as its stability properties. The laminate was divided into two zones with different lay-ups from the view of plan form during the design process. Combined with the finite element model produced by ABAQUS, the variation of displacements and curvature of the multistable variable stiffness laminate were analyzed during the cool-down stage.
3 VSD method
The VSD method can significantly improve the design space of the composite material, and it also made the design scheme very cumbersome. Therefore, one good design method can increase the design accuracy and decrease the design cost. To achieve this objective, when new researchers are faced with a VSD problem, they first have to formulate an optimization model based on material property and structure geometry. This model involves posing an engineering design problem. Generally, designers have to take multiple performance requirements into consideration, such as buckling strength, maximum natural frequency, and maximum allowable load. Thus, the variable stiffness optimization model is actually a multiobjective optimization problem. After model formulation, the designers need to select an appropriate optimization method and design variables to realize the optimization of the objective function. Meanwhile, most optimization problems are with constraints (i.e. the range of the design variables is limited). The constraints of process capability and manufacturability can be taken into consideration in the process of VSD. The process of variable stiffness optimization design is shown in Figure 3.

Process of variable stiffness optimization design.
In previous studies, Ghiasi et al. [80] summarized the parameterization methods and optimization algorithms used in early VSD in detail. The optimization algorithms are classified into six categories: gradient-based, criterion optimality, topology, search direct, multilevel, and hybrid six kinds. The results obtained by comparison are as follows: (i) the optimization criterion and topology optimization method based on local optimization are the best choice for the VSD. These methods transform the complex design problem into a series of simple local problems and solve the problem with simple methods. (ii) The multilevel optimization method is the best choice when the optimization criterion cannot be established. These methods can divide the original problem into several parts, and at the same time, there are only a few design variables in every subproblem. The optimization algorithms commonly used in the design of FRP composite materials are summarized and the corresponding theoretical formulas are comprehensively given in Ref. [81]. The usage of the variable stiffness optimization design method in recent years is briefly summarized as follows.
3.1 General numerical optimization design methods
The numerical optimization techniques mentioned here mainly include the gradient-based optimization methods and its derivate techniques using the convexity of the objective function or converting the nonconvex function into convex to solve the optimization. All these types of approaches have a wide application scope, and it has been applied in every optimization field at a very early time. To solve the issue of VSD, the design parameters of the composite material, such as tow angle, are viewed as directly or indirectly variable. Stodieck et al. [75] defined the fiber angle function as a linear variation of the fiber orientation along the coordinate. The aeroelastic behavior was formulated based on the energy balance equation for a conservative system. Meanwhile, the impacts of the fiber angle variation on free vibration, flexural axis, flutter and divergence speeds, and gust loads were investigated. In a further work [82], using the modified wing structural model, a multiobjective optimization method was presented. This method can make the simultaneous minimization of correlated gust loads at two different design airspeeds realizable. However, the author also pointed out that this method is appropriate only for the simple rectangular plate wind model. For wing with different geometries or further complications, more study is required.
Wu et al. [83] developed an enhanced two-level optimization framework for the buckling optimization design of variable stiffness plates. This framework begins with establishing explicit stiffness matrices according to material invariants and lamination parameters. Subsequently, B-spline basis functions and Lagrangian polynomials were applied to determine the optimal fiber angle at each control point for the maximum buckling load. The advantages of this VSD framework are that only less design variables are required and the continuity of the fiber orientation is ensured. To reduce defects such as fiber wrinkling, the continuous Bezier curves are then replaced by piecewise quadratic Bezier curve, which is used to create the curved tow path [84], [85].
3.2 DQM
DQM is a numerical discretization technique that approximates derivatives using a linear weighted sum of all the functional values in the domain. For instance, as for 1D interval division, the kth derivative at the ith discretization point is
where xi is the set of discretization points in the x-direction and
Based on this method, Groh et al. [87] developed a reduced 2D equivalent single-layer formulation for the flexural behavior of variable stiffness plates incorporating transverse shear effects. In a further research, Groh and Weaver [88] realized variable stiffness plate buckling design by establishing and solving the equilibrium equations with DQM methods that use fiber orientation and lamination thickness as the variables. Raju et al. [89] and White et al. [50] realized the postbuckling design of variable stiffness plate and curved shell, respectively, by solving boundary equations with DQM methods. Tornabene et al. [90], [91] developed a strong-form finite element method based on DQM, which has been used to study the static and vibrational responses of doubly curved variable angle tow (VAT) laminates.
3.3 Intelligent optimization design methods
Intelligent optimization methods, also known as the modern heuristic algorithm, which possess the qualities of global optimization, high universality, are suitable for parallel processing. It is usually based on a strict theory rather than an expert experience and gets the precise or approximate optimal solution within a certain period of time theoretically.
For the purpose of reducing high computation time consumption, Bardy et al. [92] used an optimal genetic algorithm to detect the optimum fiber orientation and to improve the stiffness and strength of a square composite laminate. In the optimization process of genetic algorithm, the influences of variable parameter on computation time were analyzed. As a result, they discovered that faster convergence required a good balance of both elitism and mixing in the population. They also found that the use of a strain-based fitness criterion was better than the use of a stress-based criterion in terms of the efficiency of converge to an optimal solution. Panesar and Weaver [78] presented a design method of blended bistable variable stiffness laminates using ant colony optimization and reported a blended flap concept exhibiting multistability.
Rouhi et al. [93] developed a multistep optimization process of variable stiffness composite cylinders based on genetic algorithm. First, the orientation angles in the variable stiffness cylinder were defined to vary in six regions from the keel to the crown, meaning that the end angle of one region can be considered as the start angle of the next. Then, the genetic algorithms were performed to calculate the optimum angle of each regional boundary to get the maximum improvement in the performance of cylinder. To enhance significantly the computational efficiency, the radial basis functions introduced by Nik et al. [94] were used to simplify the finite element analyses. Finally, numerical simulation is implemented to verify that the aspect ratio has a significant impact on the buckling load but the radius of cylinder has not. Sliseris and Rocens [95] mentioned another multistep optimal design process of composite plates with discrete variable stiffness, which is also using the genetic algorithm.
3.4 Other methods
To reduce the computational expense, metamodel-based design optimization (MBDO) methods are used in which the costly high-fidelity functions are replaced by low-cost analytical approximation functions that are so-called surrogate models or metamodels. Luersen et al. [59] presented a design method of variable stiffness cylindrical shell for maximum fundamental frequency using a surrogate method to optimize the fiber path parameters. Rouhi et al. realized the VSD of cylindrical shells [96] and elliptical cylinders [97] using this model reduction method.
In contrast to the DQM mentioned before, Zucco et al. [98] presented a mixed finite element method for linear static and buckling analyses of variable stiffness composite lamination. This method exhibited strong performance in terms of convergence rate and numerical errors. Besides that, other higher-order finite elements have also been used to study the bending [99] and vibrational response [60], [100] of VAT plates.
4 Successful examples of VSD
AFP [101], robot fiber placement (RFP) [102], and tailored fiber placement (TFP) [103] are the main technologies to automate the manufacture of fiber composite that offers the capability of steering individual fiber tows over the surface of a laminate. The emergence of these advanced technologies makes it possible to fabricate the variable stiffness composite structure in the real world. Gürdal and Olmedo [104], [105] first presented a VSD method for a linear variation of the fiber orientation along the coordinate. The design parameters are the starting angles at the middle of the panel and the ending angles at the edge. In a later research [106], [107], the curvilinear tow paths based on constant curvature arcs were mentioned. This simple VSD method is widely used in the manufacture of variable stiffness structure.
Gliesche et al. [108] applied the continuous fiber to achieve local reinforcement in an open hole laminate by the application of the TFP technology. Strain concentration can be effectively reduced using continuous curve fiber. In addition, the results of tensile tests presented that the tensile strength can be increased by more than 50% and the loss of strength can be reduced effectively. Chauncey [109] from the NASA Langley Research Center fabricated two variable stiffness laminates using Viper Fiber Placement System by Cincinnati machine. He also introduced some issues that arise from the manufacturing processes used to fabricate the variable stiffness laminates. The thermal tests were first performed to compare and evaluate the structural response of variable stiffness laminates.
Lopes et al. [37] manufactured two types of variable stiffness laminates by the tow-drop and overlap methods, which used cutting tows with individual function of advanced automated tow placement. Compared to the straight fiber laminates, the variable stiffness laminates demonstrated the advantages of compressive buckling and first-ply failure. Based on the simulations, the improvements achieved by the tow-drop method (24.8%) are even surpassed by the overlap method (33.9%), as happens with buckling performance (Figure 4). These benefits are a consequence of the added capacity for load redistribution demonstrated by tow-steered laminates. To promote the VSD concepts for realistic aeronautical structures, Jegley et al. [110] presented experimental results and comparisons to finite element predictions for variable stiffness laminates subjected to compression or shear loading. The results presented establish the buckling performance improvements attainable by elastic tailoring of composite laminates. In the latest research, Boukhili et al. [111] further investigated the compressive properties of the overlaps and gaps of variable stiffness samples. The experimental results show that, for variable stiffness panels, panels with complete overlaps exhibit higher buckling resistance characteristics (prebuckling stiffness and buckling load) than those with complete gaps. According to the data collected from the strain gauges, it was found that the presence of AFP defects (i.e. overlaps and gaps) does not affect the symmetry of the structural response of variable stiffness composite laminates. Coburn et al. [112], [113] made the analysis of prebuckling and buckling of variable stiffness plate realizable by constructing a rapid and robust semianalytical model based on the energy balance equation. Subsequently, the design of blade stiffened wing panels with greater critical buckling loads was realized using a beam stiffener model and a plate stiffener model.
![Figure 4: Load-displacement curves for panels designed by three different construction methods.First-ply failure is indicated by the last symbol on each curve. Reproduced from Lopes et al. [37].](/document/doi/10.1515/secm-2016-0093/asset/graphic/j_secm-2016-0093_fig_004.jpg)
Load-displacement curves for panels designed by three different construction methods.
First-ply failure is indicated by the last symbol on each curve. Reproduced from Lopes et al. [37].
To design a tow-steered composite cylinder with a given diameter, Wu [114] used a segmented fiber angle to define the curvilinear paths. The fiber orientation angle varies continuously from 10° (with respect to the shell axis of revolution) at the crown to 45° on the side and back to 10° on the keel. Then, the static stiffness and buckling loads of this cylinder were analyzed by applying both finite element analyses and the classical strength theory. In the following study [115], using the same curvilinear tow paths and combining with the manufacture process, the two cylindrical tow-steered shells with and without the overlap were fabricated via the AFP. The axial compression tests were performed by the VIC3D digital image correlation system. The result shows that the buckling load of the shell with overlap is higher than the shell without the overlap. White et al. [51] used the same formulation to analyze the prebuckling. Two types of variable stiffness composite cylinder for overlapping located and tows dropped were manufactured. To match them with experiment, an axial compression test rig was built with a 1300 kN test machine. The test results show that the tow-drop variable stiffness cylinder had a more uniform thickness, hence a higher postbuckling stiffness.
Blom et al. [23], [116], [117] presented a VSD method of composite cylindrical shell for maximum load-carrying capability under pure bending. The variable stiffness cylinders were manufactured by Boeing using an Ingersoll fiber placement machine. The variable stiffness composite cylindrical shell is shown in Figure 5. In addition, the bending and modal tests were carried out on this type of variable stiffness cylindrical shell, respectively. The load redistribution mechanism of the variable stiffness cylinder should result in a higher load-carrying capability when compared to the baseline cylinder, even when cutouts or damage are introduced on the compression side. Later, Rouhi et al. [93], [118] developed a multistep design process of variable stiffness composite cylinders to analyze the effect of structural parameters. The structural parameters included radius (R) and the aspect ratio (L/R). Finally, numerical simulation was implemented to verify that the aspect ratio has a significant impact on the buckling load but the radius of cylinder has not.
![Figure 5: Variable stiffness cylinder during manufacturing.Reproduced from Blom et al. [117].](/document/doi/10.1515/secm-2016-0093/asset/graphic/j_secm-2016-0093_fig_005.jpg)
Variable stiffness cylinder during manufacturing.
Reproduced from Blom et al. [117].
Blom et al. [119] summarized four different tow-steered paths, which include geodesic path, constant angle path, path with linearly varying fiber angles, and constant curvature path. Figure 6 shows an example of these paths. These paths were used to define the conical shells. Finally, the manufacturability of these paths was checked using advanced tow-placed machines. Similar research steps were applied for the maximum fundamental eigenfrequency about the variable stiffness conical shells [58]. The defects of placement were carried out in the poststudy [120]. The constant curvature path presented above was employed by Nik et al. [121]. They studied the effect of the gap and overlap within variable stiffness laminates. The results presented that increasing the number of tows within a course reduces the amount of defect areas. This consequence can be used to optimize the variable stiffness laminates.

Different fiber paths for conical shell.
5 Concluding remarks
The variable stiffness method for structure design can take the advantages of designability of the carbon fiber composite materials much more than the conventional method of constant stiffness. According to the concept of VSD, different structure design schemes may be put forward due to different external loads even if the shapes of the component were identical. A sophisticated set of design method is essential for obtaining ideal results of variable stiffness composite structure. With the development of mathematics and computer science, more and more kinds of mathematical optimization methods are applied to the structure design of composite materials promoting analysis quality, optimization precision, and calculation accuracy.
The works addressed in this review demonstrate that the VSD method with the use of continuous curve fiber further exploits the designability of the composite. With the variation of the fiber orientation, it does not only reallocate the distribution of stiffness in each layer but also complicates the mechanical performance of entire structure. The mechanical properties of final products can be different due to the different geometry of the components, although the fiber placement paths adopted are the same. For instance, a composite laminate manufactured using the complete overlap method shows a higher buckling resistance [111]. However, the same characteristic of a cylinder is lower than the one made using the tow-drop method [51]. These differences increase the uncertainty and difficulty of the VSD. Therefore, the designer must have highly specialized knowledge and design experience with the composite material.
In the VSD of the composite structure, the ultimate performances of the products are tough to evaluate due to variations in fiber angle. In the moment, the result of numerical simulation is not in good conformity with the result of the experiment. There are two main reasons to make a difference. The first reason is that the digital model in simulation software is based on an ideal implement item, as shown in Figure 7. However, the errors caused by the fiber placement machine and material are inevitable, which are related to the precision of the inertial instruments and the performance of composite. Meanwhile, the mechanical properties of the composite structure may be changed in the curing process. On the contrary, the final prediction result is also dependent on the selection of failure criterion, which was demonstrated in Ref. [110]. To promote the application of the VSD method, an integrated failure criterion system needs to be established.
![Figure 7: Fiber orientation on ideal and manufacturable tow-steered plies with a central hole.Reproduced from Lopes et al. [122]. (A) Ideal ply. (B) Manufacturable ply.](/document/doi/10.1515/secm-2016-0093/asset/graphic/j_secm-2016-0093_fig_007.jpg)
Fiber orientation on ideal and manufacturable tow-steered plies with a central hole.
Reproduced from Lopes et al. [122]. (A) Ideal ply. (B) Manufacturable ply.
Most VSD problems are still concentrated on a single property of weight reducing, improving the buckling strength and natural frequency, and so on. In the design of the composite structure, it often needs more than one mechanical performance to reach index requirements. This means that the VSD needs to find out the balance of various kinds of properties. At the same time, the performance and geometry of the composite after the molding are hardly consistent with the design due to different equipment and manufacturing process. Defects such as gaps and overlap are inevitable while the fiber angle change. Ways of getting more ideal design results between defects and performance, maintenance, and damage tolerance in the later period are of great importance to the practical application of VSD. There is still more work that needs to be done to make technological breakthroughs.
In summary, great progress in VSD was made in the past decades. From the numerical and coupon-level experimental researches to the practical application of VSD, there are still many aspects that require further investigation.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (51275393), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20120201110031), and the Xi’an Jiaotong University Funds of Fundamental Scientific Research (xkjc2014010).
References
[1] McCarthy R, Haines G, Newley R. Compos. Manuf. 1994, 5, 83–93.10.1016/0956-7143(94)90059-0Search in Google Scholar
[2] Kathiravan R, Ganguli R. Compos. Struct. 2007, 81, 471–479.10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.09.007Search in Google Scholar
[3] Ganguli R. J. Indian Inst. Sci. 2013, 93, 557–570.10.4141/cjas2013-503Search in Google Scholar
[4] Abrate S. Compos. Struct. 1994, 29, 269–286.10.1016/0263-8223(94)90024-8Search in Google Scholar
[5] Savic V, Tuttle ME, Zabinsky ZB. Compos. Struct. 2001, 53, 265–277.10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00010-1Search in Google Scholar
[6] Bruyneel M, Fleury C. Adv. Eng. Software 2002, 33, 697–711.10.1016/S0965-9978(02)00053-4Search in Google Scholar
[7] Tsau L-R, Chang Y-H, Tsao F-L. Comput. Struct. 1995, 55, 565–580.10.1016/0045-7949(94)00321-SSearch in Google Scholar
[8] Nagendra S, Jestin D, Gürdal Z, Haftka RT, Watson LT. Comput. Struct. 1996, 58, 543–555.10.1016/0045-7949(95)00160-ISearch in Google Scholar
[9] Todoroki A, Terada Y. AIAA J. 2004, 42, 141–148.10.2514/1.9038Search in Google Scholar
[10] Matsuzaki R, Todoroki A. Compos. Struct. 2007, 78, 537–550.10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.11.015Search in Google Scholar
[11] Kim J-S, Kim C-G, Hong C-S. Compos. Struct. 1999, 46, 171–187.10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00052-5Search in Google Scholar
[12] Zehnder N, Ermanni P. Compos. Struct. 2006, 72, 311–320.10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.021Search in Google Scholar
[13] Mukherjee A, Varughese B. Comput. Struct. 1995, 54, 865–870.10.1016/0045-7949(94)00331-VSearch in Google Scholar
[14] Cairns DS, Mandell JF, Scott ME, Maccagnano JZ. Compos. Pt. B Eng. 1999, 30, 523–534.10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00043-2Search in Google Scholar
[15] Shirinzadeh B, Alici G, Foong CW, Cassidy G. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2004, 20, 17–28.10.1016/S0736-5845(03)00050-4Search in Google Scholar
[16] Hyer M, Charette R. NASA-CR-186453 Contract No. 19900010820, 1990.Search in Google Scholar
[17] Hyer M, Lee H. Compos. Struct. 1991, 18, 239–261.10.1016/0263-8223(91)90035-WSearch in Google Scholar
[18] Hyer M, Charette R. AIAA J. 1991, 29, 1011–1015.10.2514/3.10697Search in Google Scholar
[19] Tosh M, Kelly D, Eds., Proceedings of the 2nd Australasian Congress on Applied Mechanics (ACAM-99), 1999.Search in Google Scholar
[20] Tosh M, Kelly D. Compos. Pt. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2000, 31, 1047–1060.10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00063-4Search in Google Scholar
[21] Alhajahmad A, Abdalla MM, Gürdal Z. J. Aircraft 2008, 45, 630–640.10.2514/1.32676Search in Google Scholar
[22] Wu Z, Weaver PM, Raju G, Kim BC. Thin Walled Struct. 2012, 60, 163–172.10.1016/j.tws.2012.07.008Search in Google Scholar
[23] Blom AW, Stickler PB, Gürdal Z. Compos. Pt. B Eng. 2010, 41, 157–165.10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.10.004Search in Google Scholar
[24] Jones S, Platts M. Appl. Compos. Mater. 1996, 3, 117–134.10.1007/BF00158997Search in Google Scholar
[25] Crothers P, Drechsler K, Feltin D, Herszberg I, Kruckenberg T. Compos. Pt. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 1997, 28, 619–625.10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00022-5Search in Google Scholar
[26] IJsselmuiden ST, Abdalla MM, Gürdal Z. AIAA J. 2008, 46, 1826–1834.10.2514/1.35565Search in Google Scholar
[27] Khani A, IJsselmuiden S, Abdalla M, Gürdal Z. Compos. Pt. B Eng. 2011, 42, 546–552.10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.11.005Search in Google Scholar
[28] Hammer VB, Bendsøe M, Lipton R, Pedersen P. Int. J. Solids Struct. 1997, 34, 415–434.10.1016/S0020-7683(96)00023-6Search in Google Scholar
[29] Falcó O, Mayugo J, Lopes C, Gascons N, Turon A, Costa J. Compos. Pt. B Eng. 2014, 56, 660–669.10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.003Search in Google Scholar
[30] Legrand X, Kelly D, Crosky A, Crépin D. Compos. Struct. 2006, 75, 524–531.10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.067Search in Google Scholar
[31] Huang J, Haftka R. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2005, 30, 335–341.10.1007/s00158-005-0519-zSearch in Google Scholar
[32] Vanderplaats GN, Hansen SR. DOT user’s manual. VMA Corp., 1997.Search in Google Scholar
[33] Tatting B, Gürdal Z, Eds., American Helicopter Society Hampton Roads Chapter, Structure Specialists’ Meeting, Williamsburg, VA, 2001.Search in Google Scholar
[34] IJsselmuiden ST, Abdalla MM, Gürdal Z. AIAA J. 2010, 48, 134–143.10.2514/1.42490Search in Google Scholar
[35] Lund E, Kühlmeier L, Stegmann J. 6th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Brazil, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
[36] Sigmund O, Torquato S, Eds., Smart Structures and Materials 1997: Smart Materials Technologies, San Diego, CA, 1997.Search in Google Scholar
[37] Lopes C, Gürdal Z, Camanho P. Comput. Struct. 2008, 86, 897–907.10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.04.016Search in Google Scholar
[38] Wu Z, Raju G, Weaver PM, Eds., Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference, 14th AIAA, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
[39] Khani A, Abdalla M, Gürdal Z. Compos. Struct. 2015, 122, 343–351.10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.071Search in Google Scholar
[40] Tatting BF, Gürdal Z, Eds., Proceedings of the 13th U.S. National Congress of Applied Mechanics (USNCAM), Gainesville, FL, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
[41] Wu KC. Thermal and Structural Performance of Tow-Placed, Variable Stiffness Panels. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2006.Search in Google Scholar
[42] Weaver PM, Potter KD, Hazra K, Saverymuthapulle MA, Hawthorne MT, Eds., AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2009.Search in Google Scholar
[43] Setoodeh S, Abdalla MM, IJsselmuiden ST, Gürdal Z. Compos. Struct. 2009, 87, 109–117.10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.01.008Search in Google Scholar
[44] Starnes J, Knight N, Rouse M. AIAA J. 1985, 23, 1236–1246.10.2514/3.9072Search in Google Scholar
[45] Falzon B, Stevens K, Davies G. Compos. Pt. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2000, 31, 459–468.10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00085-8Search in Google Scholar
[46] Wu K, Gürdal Z, Starnes J, Eds., Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Denver, CO, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
[47] Lopes CS, Camanho PP, Gürdal Z, Tatting BF. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2007, 44, 8493–8516.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.06.029Search in Google Scholar
[48] Raju G, Wu Z, Weaver PM. Compos. Struct. 2013, 106, 74–84.10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.010Search in Google Scholar
[49] Raju G, White S, Wu Z, Weaver P, Eds. Proceedings of the 56th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Kissimmee, FL, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
[50] White S, Raju G, Weaver P. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 2014, 71, 132–155.10.1016/j.jmps.2014.07.003Search in Google Scholar
[51] White SC, Weaver PM, Wu KC. Compos. Struct. 2015, 123, 190–203.10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.013Search in Google Scholar
[52] White S, Weaver P. Aeronaut. J. 2016, 120, 233–253.10.1017/aer.2015.14Search in Google Scholar
[53] Wu Z, Weaver PM, Raju G. Compos. Struct. 2013, 103, 34–42.10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.03.004Search in Google Scholar
[54] Wu Z, Raju G, Weaver PM. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2013, 50, 1770–1780.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.02.001Search in Google Scholar
[55] Leissa A, Martin A. Compos. Struct. 1990, 14, 339–357.10.1016/0263-8223(90)90014-6Search in Google Scholar
[56] Honda S, Oonishi Y, Narita Y, Sasaki K. J. Syst. Des. Dyn. 2008, 2, 76–86.10.1299/jsdd.2.76Search in Google Scholar
[57] Honda S, Narita Y. Compos. Struct. 2011, 93, 902–910.10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.07.003Search in Google Scholar
[58] Blom AW, Setoodeh S, Hol JM, Gürdal Z. Comput. Struct. 2008, 86, 870–878.10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.04.020Search in Google Scholar
[59] Luersen MA, Steeves CA, Nair PB. J. Compos. Mater. 2015, 49, 3583–3597.10.1177/0021998314568168Search in Google Scholar
[60] Akhavan H, Ribeiro P. Compos. Struct. 2011, 93, 3040–3047.10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.04.027Search in Google Scholar
[61] Akhavan H, Ribeiro P, Moura MFSFD. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2013, 73, 14–26.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.03.013Search in Google Scholar
[62] Ribeiro P, Akhavan H. Compos. Struct. 2012, 94, 2424–2432.10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.025Search in Google Scholar
[63] Blom AW, Abdalla MM, Gürdal Z. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2010, 70, 564–570.10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.003Search in Google Scholar
[64] Parnas L, Oral S, Ceyhan Ü. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 1071–1082.10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00312-3Search in Google Scholar
[65] Honda S, Igarashi T, Narita Y. Compos. Pt. B Eng. 2013, 45, 1071–1078.10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.056Search in Google Scholar
[66] Alhajahmad A, Abdalla MM, Gürdal Z. J. Aircraft 2010, 47, 775–782.10.2514/1.40357Search in Google Scholar
[67] Nik MA, Fayazbakhsh K, Pasini D, Lessard L. Compos. Struct. 2012, 94, 2306–2313.10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.021Search in Google Scholar
[68] Srinivas N, Deb K. Evol. Comput. 1994, 2, 221–248.10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221Search in Google Scholar
[69] Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T. Evol. Comput. IEEE Trans. 2002, 6, 182–197.10.1109/4235.996017Search in Google Scholar
[70] Nik MA, Lessard L, Pasini D. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2015, 22, 157–163.10.1515/secm-2014-0167Search in Google Scholar
[71] Setoodeh S, Gürdal Z, Eds., Proceedings of the 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Norfolk, VA, 2003.Search in Google Scholar
[72] Setoodeh S, Abdalla M, Gürdal Z. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2005, 30, 413–421.10.1007/s00158-005-0528-ySearch in Google Scholar
[73] Setoodeh S, Gürdal Z, Watson LT. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2006, 195, 836–851.10.1016/j.cma.2005.03.005Search in Google Scholar
[74] Setoodeh S, Abdalla MM, Gürdal Z. Compos. Pt. B Eng. 2006, 37, 301–309.10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.12.001Search in Google Scholar
[75] Stodieck O, Cooper JE, Weaver PM, Kealy P. Compos. Struct. 2013, 106, 703–715.10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.023Search in Google Scholar
[76] Panesar AS, Hazra K, Weaver PM. Compos. Pt. A App. Sci. Manuf. 2012, 43, 926–934.10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.01.029Search in Google Scholar
[77] Panesar A, Weaver PM, Eds., AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
[78] Panesar AS, Weaver PM. Compos. Struct. 2012, 94, 3092–3105.10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.007Search in Google Scholar
[79] Sousa C, Camanho P, Suleman A. Compos. Struct. 2013, 98, 34–46.10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.053Search in Google Scholar
[80] Ghiasi H, Fayazbakhsh K, Pasini D, Lessard L. Compos. Struct. 2010, 93, 1–13.10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.06.001Search in Google Scholar
[81] Awad ZK, Aravinthan T, Zhuge Y, Gonzalez F. Mater. Des. 2012, 33, 534–544.10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.061Search in Google Scholar
[82] Stodieck O, Cooper JE, Weaver PM, Kealy P. AIAA J. 2015, 53, 1–13.10.2514/1.J054077Search in Google Scholar
[83] Wu Z, Raju G, Weaver PM. AIAA J. 2015, 103, 1–17.10.1007/978-1-4471-6696-2_4Search in Google Scholar
[84] Kim BC, Potter K, Weaver PM. Compos. Pt. A App. Sci. Manuf. 2012, 43, 1347–1356.10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.02.024Search in Google Scholar
[85] Kim B, Potter K, Weaver P, Eds., 15th European Conference on Composite Materials, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
[86] Lamacchia E, Eckstein E, Pirrera A, Weaver P, Eds., AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
[87] Groh RMJ, Weaver PM, White S, Raju G, Wu Z. Compos. Struct. 2013, 100, 464–478.10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.014Search in Google Scholar
[88] Groh RMJ, Weaver PM. Compos. Struct. 2014, 107, 482–493.10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.08.025Search in Google Scholar
[89] Raju G, Wu Z, Weaver PM, Eds., Proceedings of the 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
[90] Tornabene F, Fantuzzi N, Bacciocchi M. Thin Walled Struct. 2016, 102, 222–245.10.1016/j.tws.2016.01.029Search in Google Scholar
[91] Tornabene F, Fantuzzi N, Bacciocchi M, Viola E. Compos. Pt. B 2015, 81, 196–230.10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.012Search in Google Scholar
[92] Bardy J, Legrand X, Crosky A. Compos. Struct. 2012, 94, 2048–2056.10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.019Search in Google Scholar
[93] Rouhi M, Ghayoor H, Hoa SV, Hojjati M. Compos. Struct. 2014, 118, 472–481.10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.08.021Search in Google Scholar
[94] Nik MA, Fayazbakhsh K, Pasini D, Lessard L. Compos. Struct. 2014, 107, 494–501.10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.08.023Search in Google Scholar
[95] Sliseris J, Rocens K. Compos. Struct. 2013, 98, 15–23.10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.11.015Search in Google Scholar
[96] Rouhi M, Ghayoor H, Hoa SV, Hojjati M. Compos. Pt. B 2015, 69, 249–255.10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.011Search in Google Scholar
[97] Rouhi M, Ghayoora H, Hoaa SV, Hojjatia M, Weave PM. Compos. Struct. 2016, 150, 115–123.10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.007Search in Google Scholar
[98] Zucco G, Groh R, Madeo A, Weaver P. Compos. Struct. 2016, 152, 324–338.10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.030Search in Google Scholar
[99] Yazdani S, Ribeiro P, Rodrigues JD. Compos. Struct. 2014, 108, 181–190.10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.014Search in Google Scholar
[100] Yazdani S, Ribeiro P. Compos. Struct. 2014, 120, 531–542.10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.10.030Search in Google Scholar
[101] Abulizi D, Duan Y, Li D, Lu B, Eds., Assembly and Manufacturing (ISAM), IEEE International Symposium, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
[102] Shirinzadeh B, Cassidy G, Oetomo D, Alici G, Ang Jr MH. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2007, 23, 380–394.10.1016/j.rcim.2006.04.006Search in Google Scholar
[103] Rolfes R, Tessmer J, Degenhardt R, Temmen H, Bürmann P, Juhasz J, Eds., Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Structures Technology, Lisbon, Portugal, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
[104] Gurdal Z, Olmedo R. AIAA J. 1993, 31, 751–758.10.2514/3.11613Search in Google Scholar
[105] Olmedo R, Gurdal Z, Eds., Proceedings of the 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 1993.Search in Google Scholar
[106] Tatting BF, Gürdal Z. NASA Contractor Report No. NASA/CR-2003-212679, 2003.Search in Google Scholar
[107] Gürdal Z, Tatting BF, Wu KC, Eds., Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
[108] Gliesche K, Hübner T, Orawetz H. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 81–88.10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00178-1Search in Google Scholar
[109] Wu KC, Gürdal Z, Eds., Proceedings of the 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Seattle, WA, 2001.Search in Google Scholar
[110] Jegley DC, Tatting BF, Gürdal Z, Eds., Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
[111] Boukhili R, Chen J, Yousefpour A. Compos. Struct. 2016, 140, 556–566.10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.012Search in Google Scholar
[112] Coburn BH, Wu Z, Weaver PM. Compos. Struct. 2014, 111, 259–270.10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.029Search in Google Scholar
[113] Coburn BH, Wu Z, Weaver PM, Eds., Proceedings of the 56th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
[114] Wu KC, Ed., Proceedings of the 23rd ASC Annual Technical Conference, Memphis, TN, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
[115] Wu KC, Stanford BK, Hrinda GA, Wang Z, Martin RA, Kim HA, Eds., Proceedings of the 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
[116] Blom AW, Rassaian M, Stickler PB, Gürdal Z, Eds., Proceedings of the 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Palm Springs, CA, 2009.Search in Google Scholar
[117] Blom A, Rassaian M, Stickler PB, Gürdal Z, Eds., Proceedings of the 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Orlando, FL, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
[118] Rouhi M, Ghayoor H, Hoa SV, Hojjati M. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2015, 22, 149–156.10.1515/secm-2014-0258Search in Google Scholar
[119] Blom AW, Tatting BF, Hol J, Gürdal Z, Eds., Proceedings of the 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Newport, RI, 2006.Search in Google Scholar
[120] Blom AW, Lopes CS, Kromwijk PJ, Gurdal Z, Camanho PP. J. Compos. Mater. 2009, 43, 403–425.10.1177/0021998308097675Search in Google Scholar
[121] Nik MA, Fayazbakhsh K, Pasini D, Lessard L. Compos. Struct. 2014, 107, 160–166.10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.059Search in Google Scholar
[122] Lopes C, Gürdal Z, Camanho P. Compos. Pt. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2010, 41, 1760–1767.10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.08.011Search in Google Scholar
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original articles
- Review of the mechanical performance of variable stiffness design fiber-reinforced composites
- Exact solution for bending analysis of functionally graded micro-plates based on strain gradient theory
- Synthesis, microstructure, and mechanical properties of in situ TiB2/Al-4.5Cu composites
- Microstructure and properties of W-Cu/1Cr18Ni9 steel brazed joint with different Ni-based filler metals
- Drilling studies on the prepared aluminum metal matrix composite from wet grinder stone dust particles
- Studies on mechanical properties of thermoplastic composites prepared from flax-polypropylene needle punched nonwovens
- Design of and with thin-ply non-crimp fabric as building blocks for composites
- Effect of coir fiber reinforcement on mechanical properties of vulcanized natural rubber composites
- Investigation and analysis of glass fabric/PVC composite laminates processing parameters
- Abrasive wear behavior of silane treated nanoalumina filled dental composite under food slurry and distilled water condition
- Finite element study into the effects of fiber orientations and stacking sequence on drilling induced delamination in CFRP/Al stack
- Preparation of PAA/WO3 composite films with enhanced electrochromism via layer-by-layer method
- Effect of alkali treatment on hair fiber as reinforcement of HDPE composites: mechanical properties and water absorption behavior
- Integration of nano-Al with one-step synthesis of MoO3 nanobelts to realize high exothermic nanothermite
- A time-of-flight revising approach to improve the image quality of Lamb wave tomography for the detection of defects in composite panels
- The simulation of the warpage rule of the thin-walled part of polypropylene composite based on the coupling effect of mold deformation and injection molding process
- Novel preparation method and the characterization of polyurethane-acrylate/ nano-SiO2 emulsions
- Microwave properties of natural rubber based composites containing carbon black-magnetite hybrid fillers
- Simulation on impact response of FMLs: effect of fiber stacking sequence, thickness, and incident angle
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original articles
- Review of the mechanical performance of variable stiffness design fiber-reinforced composites
- Exact solution for bending analysis of functionally graded micro-plates based on strain gradient theory
- Synthesis, microstructure, and mechanical properties of in situ TiB2/Al-4.5Cu composites
- Microstructure and properties of W-Cu/1Cr18Ni9 steel brazed joint with different Ni-based filler metals
- Drilling studies on the prepared aluminum metal matrix composite from wet grinder stone dust particles
- Studies on mechanical properties of thermoplastic composites prepared from flax-polypropylene needle punched nonwovens
- Design of and with thin-ply non-crimp fabric as building blocks for composites
- Effect of coir fiber reinforcement on mechanical properties of vulcanized natural rubber composites
- Investigation and analysis of glass fabric/PVC composite laminates processing parameters
- Abrasive wear behavior of silane treated nanoalumina filled dental composite under food slurry and distilled water condition
- Finite element study into the effects of fiber orientations and stacking sequence on drilling induced delamination in CFRP/Al stack
- Preparation of PAA/WO3 composite films with enhanced electrochromism via layer-by-layer method
- Effect of alkali treatment on hair fiber as reinforcement of HDPE composites: mechanical properties and water absorption behavior
- Integration of nano-Al with one-step synthesis of MoO3 nanobelts to realize high exothermic nanothermite
- A time-of-flight revising approach to improve the image quality of Lamb wave tomography for the detection of defects in composite panels
- The simulation of the warpage rule of the thin-walled part of polypropylene composite based on the coupling effect of mold deformation and injection molding process
- Novel preparation method and the characterization of polyurethane-acrylate/ nano-SiO2 emulsions
- Microwave properties of natural rubber based composites containing carbon black-magnetite hybrid fillers
- Simulation on impact response of FMLs: effect of fiber stacking sequence, thickness, and incident angle