Home Exact solution for bending analysis of functionally graded micro-plates based on strain gradient theory
Article Open Access

Exact solution for bending analysis of functionally graded micro-plates based on strain gradient theory

  • Meisam Mohammadi EMAIL logo , Afshin Iranmanesh , Seyed Sadegh Naseralavi and Hamed Farahmand
Published/Copyright: October 25, 2016

Abstract

In the present article, static analysis of thin functionally graded micro-plates, based on Kirchhoff plate theory, is investigated. Utilizing the strain gradient theory and principle of minimum total potential energy, governing equations of rectangular micro-plates, subjected to distributed load, are explored. In accordance with functionally graded distribution of material properties through the thickness, higher-order governing equations are coupled in terms of displacement fields. Introducing a novel methodology, governing equations are decoupled, with special privilege of solving analytically. These new equations are solved for micro-plates with Levy boundary conditions. It is shown that neutral plane in functionally graded micro-plate is moved from midplane to a new coordinate in thickness direction. It is shown that considering micro-structures effects affects the governing equations and boundary conditions. Finally, the effects of material properties, micro-structures, boundary conditions and dimensions are expounded on the static response of micro-plate. Results show that increasing the length scale parameter and FGM index increases the rigidity of micro-plate. In addition, it is concluded that using classical theories for study of micro-structures leads to inaccurate results.

1 Literature survey

Requirements of new high technology devices, which are used in different fields of engineering such as aeronautical or biomechanical applications, expand wide subjects for researchers. Recent advances in the Micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS) and Nano electro mechanical systems (NEMS) have necessitated special studies in these fields. NEMS and MEMS are usually made out of different parts which can be modeled as beams or plates. Therefore, it is important to survey an accurate comprehending of their behavior.

Experimental studies on the plates and beams show that structures in small scales are influenced by their dimensions [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Hence, classical theories that were used for analyzing plates are modified [6]. For investigating micro-plates, different theories have been proposed by researchers such as strain gradient theory [7], [8], couple stress theory [9] and micro polar theory [10], [11]. Considering the effect of micro-structures to capture the size effects in these theories, constitutive equations are defined.

Among the theories, strain gradient theory is one of the most usable ones which is a higher-order generalized form of classical elasticity theory. According to the general form of Mindlin theory [7], strain energy density is composed of three terms, i.e. displacements, gradients of strain and gradients of rotation. In the couple stress theory, it is assumed that the energy density contains expressions of gradient of rotation. Mindlin and Eshel considered the first-order gradient of strains in the energy density and proposed that a form contains five elastic constants in addition to two usual Lamé constants for an isotropic linear elastic micro-structured solid [8].

A review of the above mentioned higher-order theories of elasticity can be found in the references [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. According to the modified couple stress theory, anti-symmetric part of gradient of rotation tensor is considered as the higher-order terms in the constitutive equations. In the modified strain gradient theory second-order deformations are considered with three material length scale parameters. It is important to note that in the modified strain gradient theory governing equations have higher order in comparison with modified couple stress theory. In the simple form of strain gradient theory, a gradient of strains is considered for capturing the small-scale effects in the micro-structure [12].

A size-dependent model for thin micro-plates (Kirchhoff micro-plates) was presented by Farahmand et al. [17], [18], [19] and Wang et al. [20]. They presented length scale parameters to capture the effect of size on the solution and improved the modified strain gradient theory in order to predict accurate results for micro-plates. Lazopoulos investigated bending of strain gradient elastic thin plates based on the Kirchhoff plate theory [21]. The variational approach was utilized in determination of the governing equations and boundary conditions. Subsequently, the effect of cross-sectional area on bending of thin micro-plates was discussed. A gradient strain elasticity theory of plates is developed for the study of non-linear problems by Lazopoulos [22]. The theory is applied to the study of the buckling behavior of a long rectangular plate under uniaxial compression and small lateral load, supported on a rigid plane foundation.

Since MEMS and NEMS components are usually subjected to thermal effects (because of electrical resistance), applying heat-resistant materials in construction of their components is an important issue for engineers. Recent developments in the metallurgy engineering lead to suggest composites with continuous distribution of material properties. Consequently, functionally graded (FG) distribution of materials was the solution for the problem [23]. The most usable functionally graded materials (FGMs) are usually combinations of ceramic and metal. Besides the important mechanical properties of the metal part, simultaneously the ceramic component in FGMs improves the thermal capacity of the composite. Therefore, FGMs can be considered as appropriate materials for micro-structures in a variety of applications, especially in MEMS. Several studies on the application of FGMs for classical plate models were carried out by Mohammadi et al. [24], [25]. Several studies were done on micro-beams made out of FGMs, e.g. Ke and Wang investigated the dynamic stability of micro-beams made out of FGMs [26]. They used the modified couple stress theory for analyzing a Timoshenko beam. It was assumed that material properties of the FG micro-beam fluctuate through the thickness, and also material properties were estimated by Mori-Tanaka homogenization technique. Consequently, the effects of length scale parameter and material properties on the dynamic stability of the beam were presented. Based on the modified couple stress theory, a new size-dependent formulation for the FG Timoshenko beam was derived by Asghari et al. [27]. In that study, material properties were considered to vary through the thickness by power law distribution. The static and vibration response of cantilever and simply supported beams were determined for different length scale parameters. Furthermore, nonlinear vibration of size-dependent FG Timoshenko micro-beams was employed by Ke et al. [28]. Modified couple stress theory of FG Timoshenko micro-beams, in addition to von-Kármán geometric nonlinearity, was used in their study to obtain higher-order nonlinear governing equations. Moreover, different boundary conditions were surveyed by using Hamilton principle in their work. Static analysis of thin FG rectangular plate with arbitrary boundary conditions were conducted by Pradhan and Chakraverty [29]. They used Rayleigh-Ritz method for determining the static response of plate subjected to uniformly distributed load and hydrostatic pressure. Sitar et al. [30] studied the large deflection of nonlinearly elastic FGM beam. It was supposed that the beam is made of finite number of laminae, and material properties vary arbitrarily through the thickness. Free vibration analysis of micron-scaled annular sector and sector graphene is firstly investigated by Civalek and Akgoz [31]. They studied the effect of the surrounded elastic matrix via two-parameter elastic foundation models. Also, sector shape is transformed via geometric transformation based on the nonlocal continuum theory.

Akgoz and Civalek presented analytical solutions for buckling, bending and vibration of micro-sized plates resting on elastic foundations using the modified couple stress theory [32]. Governing equations for bending, buckling and vibration were determined via Hamilton’s principles together with the modified couple stress and Kirchhoff plate theories. The surrounding elastic medium is modeled as the Winkler elastic foundation for micro-plate with four edges simply supported. Natural frequencies of FG nano-plates were analyzed for different combinations of boundary conditions by Zare et al. [33]. They presented an analytical solution for solving the governing equations of motion. Zhang et al. [34] develop a novel size-dependent plate model for the axisymmetric bending, buckling and free vibration analysis of FG circular/annular micro-plates based on the strain gradient elasticity theory. Refined third-order shear deformation theory which assumes that the in-plane and transverse displacements are partitioned into bending and shear components and satisfies the zero traction boundary conditions on the top and bottom surfaces of micro-plate is utilized for analysis.

As it was reviewed briefly, most of the studies on the FG micro-structures have been limited to beams and not plates. Hence, the present study is emphasised on bending analysis of thin FG rectangular micro-plates. In accordace to the strain gradient theory along with inclusion of one length scale parameter, governing equations are obtained for flextural rectangular micro-plate. Since micro-plate is made out of FGMs, there is a coupling in the governing equations which is removed by introducing a new method. Decoupled equations are solved analyticaly for a micro-plate with Levy boundary conditions. Finally, the effect of length scale parameter, material properties and boundary conditions on the micro-plate deflection are investigated in detail.

2 Strain gradient elasticity theory

In small-scale structures such as micro-structures, the size and micro-structural effects are important and affect mechanical behaviors. In strain gradient theory, the size effects are involved in the stress-strain relations by implementing gradient of strains, which in general form is written as

(1)σ=f(σ0,ε,gn,η)

where σ0 is initial stress, ε is strain, g is length scale parameter and η is strain gradient. The simplest possible version of strain gradient elasticity theory based on the Mindlin studies [7], [8] (which contains five length scale constants in addition to the two Lamé constants) is a model with just one length scale constant in addition to the Lamé constants. The constitutive equations for this model are given as [35]

(2)σ¯=τ¯.μ¯τ¯=2με¯+λtr(ε¯)Iμ¯=g2τ¯=g2λ(trε¯)I+2g2με¯

In the above equations, σ¯ and τ¯ are the total and the classical Cauchy stress tensors, respectively. Also, parameter I is the unit tensor, ε¯ and tr(ε¯) are the strain tensor and its trace which are expressed in terms of the displacement vector u as:

(3)ε¯=12(u+uT)tr(ε¯)=u

In Equation (2), g2 is the volumetric strain energy gradient coefficient or simply gradient coefficient where g (length scale parameter) is defined as the internal or characteristic length of a micro-structure. Also, λ and μ are the two classical Lamé constants.

Imposing the strain gradient term with length scale parameter in conventional elasticity as a constraint was first discussed by Farahmand and Arabnejad [36]. Comparison of experimental results from torsion and bending tests of beams with the theoretical ones obtained from the study and other higher-order elasticity models reveal that the magnitude of the gradient coefficient g (length scale parameter) is of the same order as the diameter of the basic building block in a micro-structure, e.g. the grain in metals or ceramics, the osteon in bones or the cell in foams [16].

3 Governing equations of functionally graded micro-plate

3.1 Fundamental equations

Consider a thin flat rectangular micro-plate subjected to arbitrary transverse distributed load q(x, y) as shown in Figure 1, where z coordinate is measured through the thickness direction and x and y are in-plane coordinates. Based on the classical (Kirchhoff) plate theory, the following displacement field is expressed as

Figure 1: Rectangular micro-plate subjected to distributed load.
Figure 1:

Rectangular micro-plate subjected to distributed load.

(4)ux(x,y,z)=uzw,x   uy(x,y,z)=vzw,y   uz(x,y,z)=w(x,y)

where ux and uy are in-plane displacement in x and y directions, respectively and uz is the transverse displacement. Also, u and v are midplane displacements and (,) indicates differentiation with respect to the variables. Therefore, the strain-displacement relations of micro-plate (considering Von-Kármán hypothesis for linear terms) are shown in Equation (5a) where strain and curvature components are defined in Equation (5b).

(5a)εx=ε¯x+zkx   εy=ε¯y+zky   2εxy=ε¯xy+zkxy
(5b)ε¯x=u,xε¯y=v,yε¯xy=u,y+v,xkx=w,xxky=w,yykxy=2w,xy

Also, the strain energy for a continuum medium is defined as

(6)U=12VσijεijdV   (ij=x,y,xy)

where V is the volume of media. In order to obtain the equilibrium equations, principle of minimum total potential energy is used. Thus, variation of strain energy is simplified as

(7)δU=12A(σxxδεxx+σyyδεyy+2σxyδεxy)dAdz=12A(σxxδε¯x+zσxxδkx+σyδε¯y+zσyδky+2σxyδε¯xy+2σxyδkxy)dAdz

In addition, the work done by the transverse distributed load per unit area q(x, y) is

(8)δW=A(q(x,y)δw)dA

Upon substituting the relations (5b) into the Equation (7) and also using Equation (8), the principle of minimum total potential energy is simplified as

(9)δΠ=δW+δU=A(q(x,y)δw)dA+12A(σxxδu,xzσxxδw,xx+σyδv,yzσyδw,yy+2σxyδ(u,y+v,x)4σxyδw,xy)dAdz

Consider the force and moment resultants as

(10)(Nx,Ny,Nxy)=h/2h/2(σx,σy,σxy)dz(Mx,My,Mxy)=h/2h/2z(σx,σy,σxy)dz

Therefore, using the divergence theorem and simplifying Equation (9) leads to

(11)δΠ=A((Nx,x+Nxy,x)δu+(Ny,y+Nxy,x)δv+(Mx,xx+My,yy+2Mxy,xy)δw)dA+B.C.'s=0

Consequently, equilibrium equations in terms of force and moment resultants are

(12)δu:Nx,x+Nxy,y=0δv:Nxy,x+Ny,y=0δw:Mx,xx+My,yy+2Mxy,xy+q(x,y)=0

In the following, the constitutive relations for FG micro-plates are determined. In order to investigate the micro-structures effects, strain gradient theory with one length scale parameter is used for capturing the size effects. Hence, it is assumed that stresses are related to strains and also gradient of strains as

(13)σx=E(z)1ν2(z)(εx+νεy)g2E(z)1ν2(z)2(εx+νεy)σy=E(z)1ν2(z)(εy+νεx)g2E(z)1ν2(z)2(εy+νεx)σxy=E(z)1+ν(z)(εxy)g2E(z)1+ν(z)2(εxy)

where ∇2 is the two-dimensional Laplacian operator in Cartesian coordinate (2=2x2+2y2). Furthermore, in Equation (13), the parameter E(z) represents the elastic modulus and ν(z) is the Poisson’s ratio. Since it is supposed that the micro-plate is made out of FGMs, the material properties vary as functions of coordinates, especially thickness variable. Hence, the elasticity modulus is defined according to the power law function as

(14)E(z)=Em+Ecm(1/2z/h)n   Ecm=EcEm

where subscripts c and m refer to the ceramic and metal components, respectively. Moreover, h is the plate’s thickness and n is known as the FGM index. In addition, it was shown that variation of Poisson’s ratio with respect to the coordinates is not significant in FGMs, so ν(z)=ν is supposed to be constant through the thickness [24].

Substituting Equations (13) and (14) into equilibrium Equations (12) and simplifying the results yields the following relations for force and moment resultants

(15)[NxNyNxyMxMyMxy]=[A11A120B11B120A12A220B12B22000A3300B33C11C120D11D120C12C220D12D22000C3300D33]([u,xv,yu,y+v,xw,xxw,yyw,xy]g22[u,xv,yu,y+v,xw,xxw,yyw,xy])

where the components of the matrix, shown in Equation (15), are

(16)(A11=A22,A12,A33)=h/2h/2(1,ν,1ν2)E(z)1ν2dz(B11=B22,B12,B33)=h/2h/2(1,ν,(1ν))zE(z)1ν2dz(C11=C22,C12,C33)=(B11,B12,B332)(D11=D22,D12,D33)=h/2h/2(1,ν,(1ν))z2E(z)1ν2dz

Hence, substituting the relations (15) into equilibrium Equations (12) leads to the governing equilibrium equations as

(17a)A11{u,xx+v,xyg2(u,xxxx+v,xxxy+u,xxyy+v,xyyy)}+B11{w,xxx+w,xyyg2(w,xxxxx+2w,xxxyy+w,xyyyy)}+A33{u,yyv,xyg2(u,xxyyv,xyyy+u,yyyyv,xxxy)}=0
(17b)A11{u,xy+v,yyg2(u,xxxy+v,xxyy+u,xyyy+v,yyyy)}+B11{w,xxy+w,yyyg2(w,xxxxy+2w,xxyyy+w,yyyyy)}+A33{u,xy+v,xxg2(u,xxxy+v,xxyyu,xyyy+v,xxxx)}=0
(17c)B11{u,xxx+v,xxy+u,xyy+v,yyyg2(u,xxxxx+v,xxxxy+2u,xxxyy+2v,xxyyy+u,xyyyy+v,yyyyy)}D11{4w+g26w}+q(x,y)=0

It should be noted that governing Equations (17) are simplified, using relation between constants (A12=A11−2A33, B12=B11−2B33, D12=D11−2D33). Equations (17) show three governing equations for bending analysis of FG rectangular micro-plates, which are coupled in terms of displacement field. As it was explained before, since the micro-plate is made out of FGMs and in definition of FGMs, material properties are functions of coordinates, thereby a coupling exists in the equations. In order to solve the governing equations analytically, it is necessary to simplify and decouple them.

3.2 Decoupling the governing equations

Here a new methodology is proposed to simplify and decouple the governing equilibrium equations. Based on Equations (17), two new functions are introduced as

(18a)φ1=(u,x+v,y)g22(u,x+v,y)
(18b)φ2=(u,yv,x)g22(u,yv,x)

Equations (18) are called boundary layer functions for FG rectangular micro-plates. Substituting Equations (18) into governing equilibrium Equations (17) results in

(19a)A11φ1,x+B11{w,xxx+w,xyyg2(w,xxxxx+2w,xxxyy+w,xyyyy)}+A33φ2,y=0
(19b)A11φ1,y+B11{w,xxy+w,yyyg2(w,xxxxy+2w,xxyyy+w,yyyyy)}A33φ2,x=0
(19c)B112φ1D11{4w+g26w}+q(x,y)=0

Doing some algebraic manipulations, Equations (19) are converted to the following relations as

(20a)2φ2=0
(20b)2φ1=B11A11{4wg26w}
(20c)(B211A11D11)(4wg26w)+q(x,y)=0

It is clear that Equations (20) are decoupled forms of governing equilibrium Equations (20), which can be solved separately. Solving the first two Equations (20) leads to the following functions for the midplane displacement components as

(21)u=B11A11w,x and v=B11A11w,y

It is easy to show that Equation (21) satisfies Equations (20a) and (20b). Therefore, boundary layer functions φ1 and φ2 are obtained as functions of the transverse displacement. Also, the in-plane components of displacement field are obtained as

(22)ux=uzw,x=(B11A11z)w,xand uy=vzw,y=(B11A11z)w,y

which indicates that in FG micro-plates, neutral plane does not coincide with the midplane. So, Equations (20a) and (20b) can be solved separately and the remaining Equation (20c) is the governing equation of FG micro-plate. This equation is simplified in general form as

(23)D(4wg26w)+q(x,y)=0

where D=(B211A11D11) is defined as the equivalent flexural rigidity of FG micro-plate. Solution of Equation (23) contains six constants which are determined by imposing boundary conditions on the solution.

It is worth to mention that governing Equation (23) is validated by the presented equation in Ref. [16] for the case of isotropic micro-plate.

3.3 Boundary conditions

As it was shown in Equation (11), by applying the variational approach, besides the equilibrium equations, boundary conditions (B.C.’s) are also determined. Along with the aforementioned description of decoupling, the energy terms containing transverse deflection are determined as

(24)A(12D((w,xx)2+2(w,xy)2+(w,yy)2+2ν((w,xx)(w,yy)(w,xy)2))12Dg2((w,xxx)2+3((w,xyy)2+(w,xxy)2)+(w,yyy)2+2ν((w,xxx)(w,xyy)+(w,yyy)(w,xxy)(w,xyy)2(w,xxy)2))dA=0

Applying the variational approach and divergence theorem, all possible boundary conditions for two edges parallel to the y axis are obtained as

(25)B.C.1:Γg2D(w,xxx+νwxyy)δwdΓy=0B.C.2:Γ(D(w,xx+νwyy)g2D(w,xxxx+υw,yyyy+(1+ν)w,xxyy))δw,xdΓy=0B.C.3:Γ(D((w,xxx+(2ν)w,xyy))g2D((w,xxxxx+(3ν)w,xxxyy+(2ν)w,xyyyyy)δw,xxdΓy=0

where Γ indicates boundaries of the micro-plate. Following the same procedure, boundary conditions for two edges parallel to the x axis can be obtained. To keep the generality and simplicity, let us introduce the parameters as

(26)Vx=D*((w,xxx+(2ν)w,xyy)g2(w,xxxxx+(3ν)w,xxxyy+(2ν)w,xyyyyy))Mx=D*((w,xx+νw,yy)g2(w,xxxx+νw,yyyy+(1+ν)w,xxyy))Mxx=g2D*(w,xxx+νw,xyy)

where Vx, Mx and Mxx indicate effective shear force, bending moment and higher-order bending moment, respectively. Higher-order moment is a non-classical boundary condition corresponding to the strain gradient theory.

It is easy to show that these boundary conditions in the case of isotropic material (n=0) are in agreement with the presented boundary conditions in Ref. [33] (see Equation (47) in Ref. [37]). Also, it is inferred that micro-structures affect the boundary conditions as well as governing equations.

In order to study the behavior of FG micro-plate analytically, Levy type boundary condition is considered. Hence, in the present study it is assumed that micro-plate is simply supported along two opposite edges in y direction and has arbitrary boundary conditions along the other edges in x direction. Therefore, boundary conditions along edges parallel to the y axis are expressed as

(27a)Simply supported edge:w=Mx=Mxx=0
(27b)Free edge: Mx=Mxx=Vx=0
(27c)Clamped edge: w=w,x=w,xx

where w represents transverse deflection. In the following, letters S, C and F denote the Simply Supported, Clamped and Free boundaries, respectively.

4 Bending analysis

Consider a micro-plate as shown in Figure 1 which is subjected to arbitrary distributed load. As it was explained, Levy boundary conditions are supposed for this micro-plate. In order to satisfy the simply supported boundary conditions, the transverse components of displacement field is written as

(28)w=m=1f(x)sin(mπy/b)

It is obvious that Equation (28) satisfies simply supported conditions of Equation (27a). Also, it is necessary to write Fourier series of arbitrary distributed load as

(29)q(x,y)=m=1qm(x)sin(mπy/b)

where

(30)qm(x)=2b0bq(x,y)sin(mπy/b)dy

Substituting Equations (28) and (29) in Equation (23) leads to

(31)D(g2f(6)(x)+(1+3g2)f(4)(x)(2(mπb)2+3g2(mπb)4)f(x)+((mπb)4+g2(mπb)6)f(x))qm(x)=0

Therefore, the analytical solution of ordinary differential Equation (31) is obtained as

(32)f(x)=C1cosh(mπbx)+C2sinh(mπbx)+C3xcosh(mπbx)+C4xsinh(mπbx)+C5cos((1g2(mπb)2)gx)+C6sin((1g2(mπb)2)gx)+(qD(mπb)4(1+g2(mπb)2)x)

where the constants (Ci, i=1, 2, …, 6) are determined by imposing boundary conditions (27) on the solution at x=0 and x=a, separately. It should be noted that in the above relation it is assumed that micro-plate is subjected to uniform distributed load q (x, y)=q.

5 Results and discussion

In order to investigate the numerical results, it is assumed that FG micro-plate is made out of silicon carbide as the ceramic part (Ec=420 GPa) and aluminum as metal part (Em=70 GPa). In addition, the Poisson’s ratio is constant and equal to ν=0.3.

To keep the generality of study, results are presented in non-dimensional form. In the following, classical results with overhead bar (such as W̅) refer to the isotropic plate with fully ceramic material (n=0) and also zero length scale parameter ((g/b)=0).

In Figures 2 and 3, maximum deflection of micro-plate is plotted. The corresponding coordinate for maximum deflection is obtained by maximizing the deflection function in each case.

Figure 2: Non-dimensional deflection vs. variation of aspect ratio.(A) SCSC micro-plate, (B) SSSS micro-plate, (C) SFSF micro-plate, (D) SSSC micro-plate, (E) SSSF micro-plate, and (F) SFSC micro-plate.
Figure 2:

Non-dimensional deflection vs. variation of aspect ratio.

(A) SCSC micro-plate, (B) SSSS micro-plate, (C) SFSF micro-plate, (D) SSSC micro-plate, (E) SSSF micro-plate, and (F) SFSC micro-plate.

Figure 3: Non-dimensional deflection vs. variation of non-dimensional length scale parameter.(A) SCSC micro-plate, (B) SSSS micro-plate, (C) SFSF micro-plate, (D) SSSC micro-plate, (E) SSSF micro-plate, and (F) SFSC micro-plate.
Figure 3:

Non-dimensional deflection vs. variation of non-dimensional length scale parameter.

(A) SCSC micro-plate, (B) SSSS micro-plate, (C) SFSF micro-plate, (D) SSSC micro-plate, (E) SSSF micro-plate, and (F) SFSC micro-plate.

In Figure 2, non-dimensional maximum deflection is depicted vs. variation of aspect ratio (a/b), different boundary conditions and several FGM indices. Non-dimensional length scale parameter is assumed to be (g/b)=0.33. According to the figures, it is clear that increasing the aspect ratio increases the non-dimensional deflection. Obviously, depending on the boundary conditions, the rate of increasing is more apparent for aspect ratios <3. This variation is not so sharp for SSSF and SFSF, but it is so steep for SCSC. Also, in this figure, the effect of material properties is shown. It is clear that increasing the index of FGM drops the load carrying capacity.

In Figure 3, effect of micro-structures on the non-dimensional deflection is presented for different material properties and boundary conditions. As seen, increasing the length scale parameters decreases the non-dimensional stress of micro-plate that shows the rising rigidity of the micro-plate, regardless of boundary conditions. Also, it is inferred that larger values of FGM index leads to more range of variations in the deflections, while the micro-structure parameter increased.

In Figures 4 and 5, non-dimensional stresses are depicted in the thickness direction for some typical micro-plates. As it was explained before, in FG micro-plate a new neutral plane was introduced where stresses on this plane are singular. Therefore, stresses are calculated for one edge to the new neutral plane. According to Figure 4, it is obvious that increasing the index of FGM increases the value of non-dimensional stresses (or higher bending rigidity).

Figure 4: Variation of non-dimensional stress through the thickness for SCSC and SFSC micro-plate.(A) SCSC micro-plate (n=1), (B) SFSC micro-plate (n=1), (C) SCSC micro-plate (n=2), and (D) SFSC micro-plate (n=2).
Figure 4:

Variation of non-dimensional stress through the thickness for SCSC and SFSC micro-plate.

(A) SCSC micro-plate (n=1), (B) SFSC micro-plate (n=1), (C) SCSC micro-plate (n=2), and (D) SFSC micro-plate (n=2).

Figure 5: Comparison of non-dimensional stress through the thickness for different boundary conditions.(A) Symmetric boundary conditions. (B) Asymmetric boundary conditions.
Figure 5:

Comparison of non-dimensional stress through the thickness for different boundary conditions.

(A) Symmetric boundary conditions. (B) Asymmetric boundary conditions.

Figure 5 presents non-dimensional stresses for a square micro-plate with linear variation of change in material properties through the thickness for different boundary conditions. According to this figure, it is inferred that SCSC micro-plate indicates the highest stiffness in comparison with the other cases. In Figure 6 different mode shapes for all Levy boundary conditions are illustrated.

Figure 6: Typical deflected micro-plate.(A) SCSC micro-plate, (B) SSSS micro-plate, (C) SFSF micro-plate, (D) SSSC micro-plate, (E) SSSF micro-plate, and (F) SFSC micro-plate.
Figure 6:

Typical deflected micro-plate.

(A) SCSC micro-plate, (B) SSSS micro-plate, (C) SFSF micro-plate, (D) SSSC micro-plate, (E) SSSF micro-plate, and (F) SFSC micro-plate.

In Tables 1 and 2, the non-dimensional deflections for FG micro-plate with different material properties, different boundary conditions and various (g/b) and aspect ratio are presented. As it is tabulated, relatively higher rigidity is obtained for maximum values of length scale parameter and increasing aspect ratio causes rapid growing rate of non-dimensional deflections.

Table 1:

Non-dimensional deflection for an isotropic micro-plate (n=0).

B.C.’sSSFFCC
a/b0.510.510.51
g/b0.10.330.10.330.10.330.10.330.10.330.10.33
w/wmax0.75780.26820.84690.34740.89990.46040.90060.46050.16790.01940.44480.0812
B.C.’sSFFCSC
a/b0.510.510.51
g/b0.10.330.10.330.10.330.10.330.10.330.10.33
w/wmax0.87790.36690.89380.43700.55860.14890.81630.33960.35910.06280.64440.1799
Table 2:

Non-dimensional deflection for a functionally graded micro-plate (n=1).

B.C.’sSSFFCC
a/b0.510.510.51
g/b0.10.330.10.330.10.330.10.330.10.330.10.33
w/wmax1.56540.5541.74940.71751.85880.95101.86030.95110.34680.04000.91870.1677
B.C.’sSFFCSC
a/b0.510.510.51
g/b0.10.330.10.330.10.330.10.330.10.330.10.33
w/wmax1.81340.81991.84620.90261.15390.30761.68610.70150.74170.12961.33110.3717

6 Conclusion

In the present study, by considering strain gradient theory, bending analysis of thin rectangular FG micro-plates is surveyed. Using the variational approach, governing equations containing higher-order terms are obtained for rectangular micro-plates. Since micro-plate is made out of FGM, there was a coupling in the governing equations which has been removed by introducing a new method. Finally, simplified equations were solved analytically for micro-plates with two opposite edges simply supported.

Consequently, deflections and stresses of the micro-plate were obtained and the effects of boundary condition, material properties, aspect ratio and micro-structures on the solution were investigated.

Comparison of non-dimensional micro-plates’ results with macro ones reveals gross differences between classical theory predictions and strain gradient results. Therefore, applying classical plate theory for micro-plates leads to overestimated results, especially for large values of FGM index (n) and length scale parameter (g).

Additionally, it was concluded that increasing the index of FGM increases the non-dimensional deflections. So the bending rigidity of micro-plate diminishes as a result of increasing the index of FGM, which corresponds to bigger portion of the metal part in comparison with the ceramic part.

References

[1] Chong ACM, Lam DCC. J. Mater. Res. 1999, 14, 4103–4110.10.1557/JMR.1999.0554Search in Google Scholar

[2] Lakes RS. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1980, 27, 282–283.10.1109/TBME.1980.326637Search in Google Scholar

[3] Lakes RS. Int. J. Solids Struct. 1986, 22, 55–63.10.1016/0020-7683(86)90103-4Search in Google Scholar

[4] Yang JFC, Lakes RS. J. Biomech. 1982, 15, 91–98.10.1016/0021-9290(82)90040-9Search in Google Scholar

[5] Hofstetter K, Hellmich C, Eberhardsteiner J. Eur. J. Mech. A-Solid. 2005, 24, 1030–1053.10.1016/j.euromechsol.2005.05.006Search in Google Scholar

[6] Wang CM, Reddy JN, Lee KH. Shear Deformable Beams and Plates, Relationship with the Classical Theory, Elsevier: Oxford, England, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Mindlin RD. Arch. Ration. Mech. An. 1964, 16, 51–78.10.1007/BF00248490Search in Google Scholar

[8] Mindlin RD, Eshel NN. Int. J. Solids Struct. 1968, 4, 109–124.10.1016/0020-7683(68)90036-XSearch in Google Scholar

[9] Toupin RA. Arch. Ration. Mech. An. 1962, 11, 385–414.10.1007/BF00253945Search in Google Scholar

[10] Eringen AC. J. Math. Mech. 1966, 15, 909–923.10.1512/iumj.1966.15.15060Search in Google Scholar

[11] Eringen AC. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 1967, 18, 12–30.10.1007/BF01593891Search in Google Scholar

[12] Lam DCC, Yang F, Chong ACM, Wang J, Tong P. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2003, 51, 1477–1508.10.1016/S0022-5096(03)00053-XSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Tiersten HF, Bleustein JL. In R.D. Mindlin and Applied Mechanics, Herrmann G, Ed., Pergamon Press: New York, 1974.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Vardoulakis I, Sulem J. Bifurcation Analysis in Geomechanis, Chapman and Hall: London, 1995.10.1201/9781482269383Search in Google Scholar

[15] Lakes RS. Experimental Methods for Study of Cosserat Elastic Solids and Other Generalized Elastic Continua, Continuum Models for Materials with Microstructure, Mühlhaus, H.B., Ed., Wiley: Chichester, 1995, p. 1–25.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Papargyri-Beskou S, Beskos DE. Arch. Appl. Mech. 2008, 78, 625–635.10.1007/s00419-007-0166-5Search in Google Scholar

[17] Farahmand H, Ahmadi AR, Arabnejad S. Thin Wall. Struct. 2011, 49, 1584–1591.10.1016/j.tws.2011.08.006Search in Google Scholar

[18] Ahmadi AR, Farahmand H. Mec. Ind. 2012, 13, 261–269.10.1051/meca/2012019Search in Google Scholar

[19] Farahmand H, Ahmadi AR, Arabnejad S. Int. J. Struct. Stabil. Dyn. 2013, 13, 1250080–1250094.10.1142/S0219455412500800Search in Google Scholar

[20] Wang B, Zhou S, Zhao J, Chen X. Eur. J. Mech. A-Solid. 2011, 30, 517–524.10.1016/j.euromechsol.2011.04.001Search in Google Scholar

[21] Lazopoulos KA. Mech. Res. Commun. 2009, 39, 777–783.10.1016/j.mechrescom.2009.05.005Search in Google Scholar

[22] Lazopoulos KA. Eur. J. Mech. A-Solid. 2004, 23, 843–852.10.1016/j.euromechsol.2004.04.005Search in Google Scholar

[23] Koizumi M. Composites 1997, 28, 1–4.10.1016/S1359-8368(96)00016-9Search in Google Scholar

[24] Mohammadi M, Saidi AR, Jomehzadeh E. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2010, 17, 81–93.10.1007/s10443-009-9100-zSearch in Google Scholar

[25] Mohammadi M, Saidi AR, Jomehzadeh E. P. I. Mech. Eng. C-J. Mec. 2009, 224, 18381–1841.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Ke LL, Wang YS. Compos. Struct. 2011, 93, 342–350.10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.09.008Search in Google Scholar

[27] Asghari M, Rahaeifard M, Kahrobaiyan MH, Ahmadian MT. Mater. Design 2011, 32, 1435–1443.10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.046Search in Google Scholar

[28] Ke LL, Wang YS, Yang J, Kitipornchai S. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2012, 50, 256–267.10.1016/j.ijengsci.2010.12.008Search in Google Scholar

[29] Pradhan KK, Chakraverty S. Arch. Civil Mech. Eng. 2015, 15, 721–734.10.1016/j.acme.2014.09.008Search in Google Scholar

[30] Sitar M, Kosel F, Borjan M. Arch. Civil Mech. Eng. 2014, 14, 700–709.10.1016/j.acme.2013.11.007Search in Google Scholar

[31] Civalek O, Akgoz B. Comp.utational Mater. Sci. 2013, 77, 295–303.10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.04.055Search in Google Scholar

[32] Akgoz B, Civalek O. Meccanica 2013, 48, 863–873.10.1007/s11012-012-9639-xSearch in Google Scholar

[33] Zare M, Nazemnezhad R, Hosseini-Hashemi S. Meccanica 2015, 50, 2391–2408.10.1007/s11012-015-0161-9Search in Google Scholar

[34] Zhang B, He Y, Liu D, Lei J, Shen L, Wang L. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2015, 79, 553–580.10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.05.017Search in Google Scholar

[35] Yang F, Chong ACM, Lam DCC, Tong P. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2002, 39, 2731–2743.10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00152-XSearch in Google Scholar

[36] Farahmand H, Arabnejad S. Int. J. Multiscale Com. Eng. 2010, 8, 441–446.10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.v8.i4.70Search in Google Scholar

[37] Papargyri-Beskou S, Giannakopoulos AE, Beskos DE. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2010, 42, 2755–2766.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-10-14
Accepted: 2016-8-27
Published Online: 2016-10-25
Published in Print: 2018-4-25

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Original articles
  3. Review of the mechanical performance of variable stiffness design fiber-reinforced composites
  4. Exact solution for bending analysis of functionally graded micro-plates based on strain gradient theory
  5. Synthesis, microstructure, and mechanical properties of in situ TiB2/Al-4.5Cu composites
  6. Microstructure and properties of W-Cu/1Cr18Ni9 steel brazed joint with different Ni-based filler metals
  7. Drilling studies on the prepared aluminum metal matrix composite from wet grinder stone dust particles
  8. Studies on mechanical properties of thermoplastic composites prepared from flax-polypropylene needle punched nonwovens
  9. Design of and with thin-ply non-crimp fabric as building blocks for composites
  10. Effect of coir fiber reinforcement on mechanical properties of vulcanized natural rubber composites
  11. Investigation and analysis of glass fabric/PVC composite laminates processing parameters
  12. Abrasive wear behavior of silane treated nanoalumina filled dental composite under food slurry and distilled water condition
  13. Finite element study into the effects of fiber orientations and stacking sequence on drilling induced delamination in CFRP/Al stack
  14. Preparation of PAA/WO3 composite films with enhanced electrochromism via layer-by-layer method
  15. Effect of alkali treatment on hair fiber as reinforcement of HDPE composites: mechanical properties and water absorption behavior
  16. Integration of nano-Al with one-step synthesis of MoO3 nanobelts to realize high exothermic nanothermite
  17. A time-of-flight revising approach to improve the image quality of Lamb wave tomography for the detection of defects in composite panels
  18. The simulation of the warpage rule of the thin-walled part of polypropylene composite based on the coupling effect of mold deformation and injection molding process
  19. Novel preparation method and the characterization of polyurethane-acrylate/ nano-SiO2 emulsions
  20. Microwave properties of natural rubber based composites containing carbon black-magnetite hybrid fillers
  21. Simulation on impact response of FMLs: effect of fiber stacking sequence, thickness, and incident angle
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/secm-2015-0415/html
Scroll to top button