Startseite A reliable algorithm for time-fractional Navier-Stokes equations via Laplace transform
Artikel Open Access

A reliable algorithm for time-fractional Navier-Stokes equations via Laplace transform

  • Amit Prakash EMAIL logo , Doddabhadrappla Gowda Prakasha und Pundikala Veeresha
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 12. Juli 2019
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this paper, numerical solution of fractional order Navier-Stokes equations in unsteady viscous fluid flow is found using q-homotopy analysis transform scheme. Fractional derivative is considered in Caputo sense. The proposed technique is a blend of q-homotopy analysis scheme and transform of Laplace. It executes well in efficiency and provides h-curves that show convergence range of series solution.

1 Introduction

Every phenomenon in fields of Science and Engineering may be alternately modelled using fractional order derivatives. It is due to their non-local property, intrinsic to several complex systems. They are used as modelling tools in nanotechnology, viscoelasticity, anomalous transport, control theory, financial & biological modelling etc. The most important among such models are those described by arbitrary order PDEs. Adomian decomposition [1], homotopy analysis, residual power series, fractional reduced differential transform, fractional variational iteration method [2, 3, 4], Laplace homotopy technique [5], Laplace variational iteration method [6], homotopy perturbation transform method [7], q-homotopy analysis transform method [8, 9, 10], modified trial equation method [11], new iterative Sumudu transform method [12] and Laplace perturbation method [13] etc. are some important methods which are applied to find numerical solution of these problems.

N-S equation define motion [14] of incompressible Newtonian fluid flow extending from enormous scale atmospheric motions to lubrication of bearings and express conservation of mass and momentum. Consider an unsteady, unidimensional viscous fluid motion in a long circular pipe. Fluid is initially at rest. Constant pressure gradient along pipe axis is abruptly imposed to set fluid in motion. Flow is taken as axially symmetric. It is given in [15] as,

ρut=pz+μDr2u+1rDru,(1)

axis of pipe is z-axis and r is radial direction.

El-Shashed and Salem [16] generalized N-S Eq. by fractional N-S Eq. of order α, as

Dtαu=P+μDr2u+1rDru,0<α1,(2)

where P=pρz, α is order of fractional derivative. If α = 1, fractional N-S Eq. reduces to classical N-S equation. Here, efficiency of q-HATM is considered to numerically solve time-fractional N-S Eq. (2). It is an elegant union of q-HAM [17, 18] & transform of Laplace. The q-HAM is actually improvement of parameter q ∈ [0, 1] in HAM to q ∈ [0, 1n], n ≥ 1. Its authority is its potential of adjusting two strong computational methodologies for probing FDEs. Eq. (2) has been handled by Momani and Odibat by ADM [19], Khan et al. by HPM and variation iteration method [20], Ragab et al. by HAM [21], Kumar et al. by fractional modified Laplace decomposition method [22] and HPTM [23], Wang and Liu by modified reduced differential transform method [24] etc. But it has not been solved by q-HATM.

2 Preliminaries

Definition 2.1

A real valued function f(t), t > 0 is in space Cμ, μR if ∃ a real number p(> μ) s.t. f(t) = tp f1(t);f1C[0, ∞), and is in space Cμm if fmCμ, MN ⋃ {0} [25, 26].

Definition 2.2

Caputo fractional derivative [9] of f, fC1m, mN ⋃ {0} is

Dtαft=dnftdtn,α=nN,1Γ(nα)0ttτnα1fnτdτ,n1<α<n,nN.

Definition 2.3

Laplace transform (LT) of Caputo fractional derivative is

LDtnαur,t=snαLur,tk=0n1snαk1ukr,0,n1<nαn.

3 Implementation of q-HATM on Navier-Stokes equation

To illustrate its efficiency, we take a fractional nonlinear nonhomogeneous PDE,

Dtαur,t+Rur,t+Nur,t=fr,t,n1<αn,(3)

where Dtαu is Caputo fractional derivative, R, N are linear, nonlinear differential operators, f(r, t) is source term.

Taking LT on Eq. (3) and applying its differentiation property, we get

Lur,t1sαk=0n1sαk1ukr,0+1sαLRur,t+LNur,tLfr,t=0.(4)

Nonlinear operator N is

Nφr,t;q=Lφr,t;q1sαk=0n1sαk1φkr,t;q0++1sαLRφr,t;q+LNφr,t;qLfr,t,(5)

here q ∈ [0, 1n] and ϕ is real function.

Build homotopy as

1nqLφr,t;qu0r,t=hqHr,tNφr,t;q,n1(6)

q is embedding parameter, H ≠ 0 is auxiliary function, h ≠0 is auxiliary parameter, u0 is initial guess.

For = 0, 1n; following results holds:

φr,t;0=u0r,t,φr,t;1n=ur,t.(7)

As q increases, φ varies from u0 to solution u(r, t).

Expanding φ about q by Taylor’s theorem, we get

φr,t;q=u0+m=1um(r,t)qm,(8)

where

ukr,t=1k!kφ(r,t;q)qk|q=0.(9)

With suitable choice of u0, n, , H, series (8) converges at q = 1n, we get

ur,t=u0+m=1um(r,t)1nm(10)

Define vectors as

um=u0r,t,u1r,t,,um(r,t).(11)

Differentiating deformation Eq. (6)m-times w. r. tq, dividing by m! & taking q = 0, we get

L[umr,tkmum1r,t]=H(r,t)Rmum1.(12)

Using inverse transform, we get

umr,t=kmum1r,t+L1H(r,t)Rmum1,(13)

where

Rmum1=1m1!m1N[φr,t;q]qm1|q=0,(14)

and

ks=0,s1,n,s>1.(15)

4 Numerical Experiments

Now we implement this method on few test problems.

Example 4.1

Consider a time-fractional N-S equation

Dtαu=Dr2u+1rDru,0<α1,(16)

with initial condition

ur,0=r.(17)

Taking transform of Laplace on each side of Eq. (16) and simplifying, we get

Lurs1sαLDr2u+1rDru=0.(18)

N is defined as,

Nφr,t;q=Lφr,t;q1kmnrs1sαL2φ(r,t;q)r2+1rφ(r,t;q)r.(19)

The mth-order deformation eqn. for H = 1 is

Lumr,tkmum1r,t=Rmum1,(20)

where

Rmum1=Lum11kmnrs1sαL2um1r2+1rum1r.(21)

Taking inverse transform on Eq. (20), we find

um=kmum1+L1Rmum1.(22)

Taking u0 and solving, we get

u1=tαrΓ(α+1),u2=n+tαrΓα+1+2t2αr3Γ(α+1),u3=n+2tαrΓα+1+2n+2t2αr3Γ2n+193t3αr5Γ3α+1,

Hence, next values may be got. The series solution of Eq. (16) is

ur,t=u0+m=1um(r,t)1nm.(23)

If n = 1, = −1 in Eq. (23), we arrive at

ur,t=r+n=112.32.2n32r2n1tnαn!.(24)

For α = 1 in Eq. (24), we gain solution of standard N-S equation as

ur,t=r+n=112.32.2n32r2n1tnn!,

Example 4.2

Now, consider time-fractional N-S equation

Dtαu=P+Dr2u+1rDru,0<α1,(25)

with initial condition

ur,0=1r2.(26)

Taking LT on Eq. (25) and simplifying, we get

Lu1r2sPsα+11sαLDr2u+1rDru=0.(27)

Also,

Nφr,t;q=Lφr,t;q1kmn1r2sPsα+11sαL2φ(r,t;q)r2+1rφ(r,t;q)r.(28)

For H = 1, deformation equation is

Lumr,tkmum1r,t=Rmum1,(29)

Here

Rmum1=Lum11kmn1r2sPsα+11sαL2um1r2+1rum1r.(30)

By inverse transform,

um=kmum1+L1Rmum1.(31)

Taking u0 and solving, we get

u1=(4P)tαΓ(α+1),u2=n+4PPtαΓ(α+1),u3=n+24Pn+PPtαΓ(α+1),

and so on ….

Series solution of Eq. (25) is

ur,t=u0+m=1um(r,t)1nm.

5 Numerical simulations and discussion

Figs. 1 and 7 show plots of numerical results of Eqs. (16) and (25) respectively when α = 0.5 and 1 for Ex. 4.1 and 4.2. Fig. 2 displays behaviour of solution for arbitrary order α and standard case α = 1 at r = 0.5, = −1, n = 1 for Ex. 4.1. Fig. 8 shows behaviour of solution for arbitrary order α and standard case α = 1 at r = 1.5, = −1, n = 1 = P for Ex. 4.2. It is clear from Fig. 2 and 8 that as α tends to 1, the q-HATM solution converges. Fig. 3 and 9 represent convergence control parameter curves for Ex. 4.1 and 4.2. The value of should be negative. From Fig. 3 and 9, it is clear that, as decreases, rate of covergence increases. Figs. 46 and 1012, show -curves at distinct order of fractional derivative at n = 1, 2, 3 for Ex. 4.1 and 4.2. In h-curves, horizontal line exhibits convergence range of solution. We observe that as arbitrary order of derivative increases, range of convergence increases. Also, from Figs. 46, 1012, it is clear that range of convergence depends positively on n. Table 1 shows comparison of results by HAM, FMLDM, HPTM, q-HATM at different values of rand twhen α = 1 = n, = −1 for Ex. 4.1. It can be observed from Table 1 that our results are accurate and agree with existing methods.

Fig. 1 Plots of q-HATM solution u(r, t) Vs. r, t when ℏ = −1, n = 1, for (a) α = 0.5 (b) α = 1, for Ex. 4.1
Fig. 1

Plots of q-HATM solution u(r, t) Vs. r, t when = −1, n = 1, for (a) α = 0.5 (b) α = 1, for Ex. 4.1

Fig. 2 α-curve of solution u(r, t) Vs. t when ℏ = −1, n = 1, r = 1.5 for Ex. 4.1
Fig. 2

α-curve of solution u(r, t) Vs. t when = −1, n = 1, r = 1.5 for Ex. 4.1

Fig. 3 Plot of solution u(r, t) Vs. t when n = 1 = α = r for Ex. 4.1
Fig. 3

Plot of solution u(r, t) Vs. t when n = 1 = α = r for Ex. 4.1

Fig. 4 ℏ-curve of q-HATM solution u(r, t) Vs. h when t = 0.01, r = 1, n = 1 for Ex. 4.1
Fig. 4

-curve of q-HATM solution u(r, t) Vs. h when t = 0.01, r = 1, n = 1 for Ex. 4.1

Fig. 5 ℏ-curve of q-HATM solution u(r, t) Vs. h when t = 0.01, r = 1, n = 2 for Ex. 4.1
Fig. 5

-curve of q-HATM solution u(r, t) Vs. h when t = 0.01, r = 1, n = 2 for Ex. 4.1

Fig. 6 ℏ-curve of q-HATM solution u(r, t) Vs. h when t = 0.01, r = 1, n = 3 for Ex. 4.1
Fig. 6

-curve of q-HATM solution u(r, t) Vs. h when t = 0.01, r = 1, n = 3 for Ex. 4.1

Fig. 7 Plots of q-HATM solution u(r, t) Vs. r, t when P = 1, ℏ = −1, n = 1, (a) α = 0.5, (b) α = 1, for Ex. 4.2.
Fig. 7

Plots of q-HATM solution u(r, t) Vs. r, t when P = 1, = −1, n = 1, (a) α = 0.5, (b) α = 1, for Ex. 4.2.

Fig. 8 α-curve of solution u(r, t) Vs. t when P = 1, ℏ = −1, n = 1, r = 1.5 for Ex. 4.2.
Fig. 8

α-curve of solution u(r, t) Vs. t when P = 1, = −1, n = 1, r = 1.5 for Ex. 4.2.

Fig. 9 Plot of solution u(r, t) Vs. t when P = 1, n = 1, α = 1, r = 1, for Ex. 4.2.
Fig. 9

Plot of solution u(r, t) Vs. t when P = 1, n = 1, α = 1, r = 1, for Ex. 4.2.

Fig. 10 h-curve of solution u(r, t) Vs. ℏ obtained when t = 0.01, r = 1, n = 1, for Ex. 4.2
Fig. 10

h-curve of solution u(r, t) Vs. obtained when t = 0.01, r = 1, n = 1, for Ex. 4.2

Fig. 11 h-curve of solution u(r, t) Vs. ℏ obtained when t = 0.01, r = 1, n = 2 for Ex. 4.2
Fig. 11

h-curve of solution u(r, t) Vs. obtained when t = 0.01, r = 1, n = 2 for Ex. 4.2

Fig. 12 h-curve of solution u(r, t) Vs. ℏ when t = 0.01, r = 1, n = 3 for Ex. 4.2
Fig. 12

h-curve of solution u(r, t) Vs. when t = 0.01, r = 1, n = 3 for Ex. 4.2

Table 1

Comparison of results by HAM, FMLDM, HPTM, q-HATM at different values of r and t when α = 1, = −1, n = 1 for Ex. 4.1.

rtHAM[21]FMLDM [22]HPTM [23]q-HATM
1.250.251.47368000001.47368000001.47368000001.4736800000
1.501.67901234571.67901234571.67901234571.6790123457
1.751.90011602311.90011602311.90011602311.9001160231
2.002.12963867192.12963867192.12963867192.1296386719
1.250.501.77544000001.77544000001.77544000001.7754400000
1.501.89506172841.89506172841.89506172841.8950617284
1.752.07046171242.07046171242.07046171242.0704617124
2.002.27148437502.27148437502.27148437502.2714843750
1.250.752.20136000002.20136000002.20136000002.2013600000
1.502.16666666672.16666666672.16666666672.1666666667
1.752.26960492652.26960492652.26960492652.2696049265
2.002.42993164062.42993164062.42993164062.4299316406
1.2512.79752000002.79752000002.79752000002.7975200000
1.502.51234567902.51234567902.51234567902.5123456790
1.752.50611352412.50611352412.50611352412.5061135241
2.002.60937500002.60937500002.60937500002.6093750000

6 Conclusion

In this paper, approximate analytic solution of time-fractional N-S equation is gained by the q-HATM. It is worth mentioning that q-HATM is capable of reducing time and work of computation in comparison to existing numerical methods keeping higher accuracy of results intact. The q-HATM contains parameters and n, that can be adopted to manage convergence of solution. It makes this scheme more powerful and exciting.



Acknowledgement

The authors are extremely thankful to the reviewer’s for carefully reading the paper and useful comments and suggestions which have helped to improve the paper.

References

[1] S. Momani and R. Qaralleh, Numerical approximations and Pade approximants for a fractional population growth model, Appl. Math. Model., 31 (2007) 1907–1914.10.1016/j.apm.2006.06.015Suche in Google Scholar

[2] A. Prakash and M. Kumar, Numerical solution of two dimensional time-fractional order biological population model, Open Physics, 14 (2016) 177-186.10.1515/phys-2016-0021Suche in Google Scholar

[3] A. Prakash, M. Goyal and S. Gupta, Fractional variation iteration method for solving time - fractional Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation, Nonlinear Engineering, (2018) 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1515/nleng-2018-0001.10.1515/nleng-2018-0001Suche in Google Scholar

[4] A. Prakash, M. Kumar and K. K. Sharma, Numerical method for solving coupled Burgers equation, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 260 (2015) 314-320.10.1016/j.amc.2015.03.037Suche in Google Scholar

[5] M. Yavuz and N. Ozdemir, Numerical inverse Laplace homotopy technique for fractional heat equations, Therm. Sci., 22(1) (2018) 185-194.10.2298/TSCI170804285YSuche in Google Scholar

[6] Z. Hammouch and T. Mekkaoui, A Laplace-variational iteration method for solving the homogeneous Smoluchowski coagulation equation, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 6 (18) (2012) 879 - 886.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] A. Prakash, Analytical method for space-fractional telegraph equation by Homotopy perturbation transform method, Nonlinear Engineering, 5(2) 2016 123-128.10.1515/nleng-2016-0008Suche in Google Scholar

[8] D. Kumar, J. Singh, D. Baleanu, A new analysis for fractional model of regularized long-wave equation arising in ion acoustic plasma waves, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 40 (2017) 5642-5653.10.1002/mma.4414Suche in Google Scholar

[9] A. Prakash and H. Kaur, Numerical solution for fractional model of Fokker-Plank equation by using q-HATM, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 105 (2017) 99-110.10.1016/j.chaos.2017.10.003Suche in Google Scholar

[10] A. Prakash and H. Kaur, q-Homotopy analysis transform method for space- and time-fractional nonlinear KdV-Burgers equations, Nonlinear Sci. Lett. A, 9(1) (2018) 44-61.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] H. Bulut, H. M. Baskonus and Y. Pandir, The modified trial equation method for fractional wave equation and time fractional generalized Burgers equation, Abstract and Applied Analysis, Vol. 2013 (2013) 1-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/636802.10.1155/2013/636802Suche in Google Scholar

[12] A. Prakash, M. Kumar and D. Baleanu, A new iterative technique for a fractional model of nonlinear Zakharov-Kuznetsov equations via Sumudu transform, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 334 (2018) 30-40.10.1016/j.amc.2018.03.097Suche in Google Scholar

[13] M. Yavuz, N. Ozdemir and H. M. Baskonus, Solutions of partial differential equations using the fractional operator involving Mittag-Leffler kernel, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 133(6) (2018) 215.10.1140/epjp/i2018-12051-9Suche in Google Scholar

[14] P. G. Lemarie Rieusset, Recent developments in the Navier-Stokes problem, CRC Press, USA, 2002.10.1201/9780367801656Suche in Google Scholar

[15] J. L.Bansal, Viscous Fluid Dynamics, Oxford, 1997.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] M. El-Shahed and A. Salem, On the generalized Navier-Stokes equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 156(1) (2004) 287-293.10.1115/DETC2003/VIB-48399Suche in Google Scholar

[17] M. A. El-Tawil and S. N. Huseen, The q-Homotopy analysis method, Int. J. Appl. Math. Mech., 8 (2012) 51-75.10.12988/ijcms.2013.13048Suche in Google Scholar

[18] M. A. El-Tawil and S. N. Huseen, On the convergence of the q-homotopy analysis method, Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci., 8 (2013) 481-497.10.12988/ijcms.2013.13048Suche in Google Scholar

[19] S. Momani and Z. M. Odibat, Analytical solution of a time-fractional Navier-Stokes equation by Adomain decomposition method, Appl. Math. Comp., 177 (2006) 488-494.10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.025Suche in Google Scholar

[20] N. A. Khan, A. Ara, S. A. Ali and A. Mahmood, Analytic study of Navier-Stokes equation with fractional order using He's homotopy perturbation and variational iteration method, International Journal of Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 10(9) (2009) 1127-1134.10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.9.1127Suche in Google Scholar

[21] A. A. Ragab, K. M. Hemida, M. S. Mohamed and M. A. Abd El Salam, Solution of time- fractional Navier-Stokes Equation by using Homotopy Analysis method, Gen. Math. Notes, 13(2) (2012) 13-21.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] S. Kumar, D. Kumar, S. Abbasbandy and M. M. Rashidi, Analytical solution of fractional Navier-Stokes equation by using modified Laplace decomposition method, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 5 (2014) 569-574.10.1016/j.asej.2013.11.004Suche in Google Scholar

[23] D. Kumar, J. Singh and S. Kumar, A fractional model of Navier-Stokes equation arising in unsteady flow of a viscous fluid, Journal of the Association of Arab Universities for Basic and Applied Science, 17 (2015) 14-19.10.1016/j.jaubas.2014.01.001Suche in Google Scholar

[24] K. Wang and S. Liu, Analytical study of time-fractional Navier-Stokes equation by using transform methods, Advances in Difference Equations, 61 (2016) 1-12, DOI 10.1186/s13662-016-0783-9.10.1186/s13662-016-0783-9Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Y. Zhoua and Li Peng, On the time-fractional Navier–Stokes equations, Comp. Math. Appl., 73 (2017) 874-891.10.1016/j.camwa.2016.03.026Suche in Google Scholar

[26] I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, Academic Press, San Diego, 1999.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-05-23
Revised: 2018-08-20
Accepted: 2018-11-06
Published Online: 2019-07-12
Published in Print: 2019-01-28

© 2019 Amit Prakash et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Chebyshev Operational Matrix Method for Lane-Emden Problem
  2. Concentrating solar power tower technology: present status and outlook
  3. Control of separately excited DC motor with series multi-cells chopper using PI - Petri nets controller
  4. Effect of boundary roughness on nonlinear saturation of Rayleigh-Taylor instability in couple-stress fluid
  5. Effect of Heterogeneity on Imbibition Phenomena in Fluid Flow through Porous Media with Different Porous Materials
  6. Electro-osmotic flow of a third-grade fluid past a channel having stretching walls
  7. Heat transfer effect on MHD flow of a micropolar fluid through porous medium with uniform heat source and radiation
  8. Local convergence for an eighth order method for solving equations and systems of equations
  9. Numerical techniques for behavior of incompressible flow in steady two-dimensional motion due to a linearly stretching of porous sheet based on radial basis functions
  10. Influence of Non-linear Boussinesq Approximation on Natural Convective Flow of a Power-Law Fluid along an Inclined Plate under Convective Thermal Boundary Condition
  11. A reliable analytical approach for a fractional model of advection-dispersion equation
  12. Mass transfer around a slender drop in a nonlinear extensional flow
  13. Hydromagnetic Flow of Heat and Mass Transfer in a Nano Williamson Fluid Past a Vertical Plate With Thermal and Momentum Slip Effects: Numerical Study
  14. A Study on Convective-Radial Fins with Temperature-dependent Thermal Conductivity and Internal Heat Generation
  15. An effective technique for the conformable space-time fractional EW and modified EW equations
  16. Fractional variational iteration method for solving time-fractional Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation
  17. New exact and numerical solutions for the effect of suction or injection on flow of nanofluids past a stretching sheet
  18. Numerical investigation of MHD stagnation-point flow and heat transfer of sodium alginate non-Newtonian nanofluid
  19. A New Finance Chaotic System, its Electronic Circuit Realization, Passivity based Synchronization and an Application to Voice Encryption
  20. Analysis of Heat Transfer and Lifting Force in a Ferro-Nanofluid Based Porous Inclined Slider Bearing with Slip Conditions
  21. Application of QLM-Rational Legendre collocation method towards Eyring-Powell fluid model
  22. Hyperbolic rational solutions to a variety of conformable fractional Boussinesq-Like equations
  23. MHD nonaligned stagnation point flow of second grade fluid towards a porous rotating disk
  24. Nonlinear Dynamic Response of an Axially Functionally Graded (AFG) Beam Resting on Nonlinear Elastic Foundation Subjected to Moving Load
  25. Swirling flow of couple stress fluid due to a rotating disk
  26. MHD stagnation point slip flow due to a non-linearly moving surface with effect of non-uniform heat source
  27. Effect of aligned magnetic field on Casson fluid flow over a stretched surface of non-uniform thickness
  28. Nonhomogeneous porosity and thermal diffusivity effects on stability and instability of double-diffusive convection in a porous medium layer: Brinkman Model
  29. Magnetohydrodynamic(MHD) Boundary Layer Flow of Eyring-Powell Nanofluid Past Stretching Cylinder With Cattaneo-Christov Heat Flux Model
  30. On the connection coefficients and recurrence relations arising from expansions in series of modified generalized Laguerre polynomials: Applications on a semi-infinite domain
  31. An adaptive mesh method for time dependent singularly perturbed differential-difference equations
  32. On stretched magnetic flow of Carreau nanofluid with slip effects and nonlinear thermal radiation
  33. Rational exponential solutions of conformable space-time fractional equal-width equations
  34. Simultaneous impacts of Joule heating and variable heat source/sink on MHD 3D flow of Carreau-nanoliquids with temperature dependent viscosity
  35. Effect of magnetic field on imbibition phenomenon in fluid flow through fractured porous media with different porous material
  36. Impact of ohmic heating on MHD mixed convection flow of Casson fluid by considering Cross diffusion effect
  37. Mathematical Modelling Comparison of a Reciprocating, a Szorenyi Rotary, and a Wankel Rotary Engine
  38. Surface roughness effect on thermohydrodynamic analysis of journal bearings lubricated with couple stress fluids
  39. Convective conditions and dissipation on Tangent Hyperbolic fluid over a chemically heating exponentially porous sheet
  40. Unsteady Carreau-Casson fluids over a radiated shrinking sheet in a suspension of dust and graphene nanoparticles with non-Fourier heat flux
  41. An efficient numerical algorithm for solving system of Lane–Emden type equations arising in engineering
  42. New numerical method based on Generalized Bessel function to solve nonlinear Abel fractional differential equation of the first kind
  43. Numerical Study of Viscoelastic Micropolar Heat Transfer from a Vertical Cone for Thermal Polymer Coating
  44. Analysis of Bifurcation and Chaos of the Size-dependent Micro–plate Considering Damage
  45. Non-Similar Comutational Solutions for Double-Diffusive MHD Transport Phenomena for Non-Newtnian Nanofluid From a Horizontal Circular Cylinder
  46. Mathematical model on distributed denial of service attack through Internet of things in a network
  47. Postbuckling behavior of functionally graded CNT-reinforced nanocomposite plate with interphase effect
  48. Study of Weakly nonlinear Mass transport in Newtonian Fluid with Applied Magnetic Field under Concentration/Gravity modulation
  49. MHD slip flow of chemically reacting UCM fluid through a dilating channel with heat source/sink
  50. A Study on Non-Newtonian Transport Phenomena in Mhd Fluid Flow From a Vertical Cone With Navier Slip and Convective Heating
  51. Penetrative convection in a fluid saturated Darcy-Brinkman porous media with LTNE via internal heat source
  52. Traveling wave solutions for (3+1) dimensional conformable fractional Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation with power law nonlinearity
  53. Semitrailer Steering Control for Improved Articulated Vehicle Manoeuvrability and Stability
  54. Thermomechanical nonlinear stability of pressure-loaded CNT-reinforced composite doubly curved panels resting on elastic foundations
  55. Combination synchronization of fractional order n-chaotic systems using active backstepping design
  56. Vision-Based CubeSat Closed-Loop Formation Control in Close Proximities
  57. Effect of endoscope on the peristaltic transport of a couple stress fluid with heat transfer: Application to biomedicine
  58. Unsteady MHD Non-Newtonian Heat Transfer Nanofluids with Entropy Generation Analysis
  59. Mathematical Modelling of Hydromagnetic Casson non-Newtonian Nanofluid Convection Slip Flow from an Isothermal Sphere
  60. Influence of Joule Heating and Non-Linear Radiation on MHD 3D Dissipating Flow of Casson Nanofluid past a Non-Linear Stretching Sheet
  61. Radiative Flow of Third Grade Non-Newtonian Fluid From A Horizontal Circular Cylinder
  62. Application of Bessel functions and Jacobian free Newton method to solve time-fractional Burger equation
  63. A reliable algorithm for time-fractional Navier-Stokes equations via Laplace transform
  64. A multiple-step adaptive pseudospectral method for solving multi-order fractional differential equations
  65. A reliable numerical algorithm for a fractional model of Fitzhugh-Nagumo equation arising in the transmission of nerve impulses
  66. The expa function method and the conformable time-fractional KdV equations
  67. Comment on the paper: “Thermal radiation and chemical reaction effects on boundary layer slip flow and melting heat transfer of nanofluid induced by a nonlinear stretching sheet, M.R. Krishnamurthy, B.J. Gireesha, B.C. Prasannakumara, and Rama Subba Reddy Gorla, Nonlinear Engineering 2016, 5(3), 147-159”
  68. Three-Dimensional Boundary layer Flow and Heat Transfer of a Fluid Particle Suspension over a Stretching Sheet Embedded in a Porous Medium
  69. MHD three dimensional flow of Oldroyd-B nanofluid over a bidirectional stretching sheet: DTM-Padé Solution
  70. MHD Convection Fluid and Heat Transfer in an Inclined Micro-Porous-Channel
Heruntergeladen am 8.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/nleng-2018-0080/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen