Home Swirling flow of couple stress fluid due to a rotating disk
Article Open Access

Swirling flow of couple stress fluid due to a rotating disk

  • Najeeb Alam Khan , Nadeem Alam Khan , Saif Ullah and Farah Naz
Published/Copyright: July 12, 2018
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The main objective of the present investigation is to examine the couple stress fluid flow occurring as a result of rotation of a disk. On implementing a suitable transformation, the governing system of partial differential equations (PDEs) is converted into nonlinear differential equations of a single independent variable. These equations are solved analytically by virtue of the Homotopy Analysis Method (HAM) which gives solutions in the form of a series. The solution of most of the governing problems is determined in terms of the absolute exponential and decaying functions by means of this powerful technique. To support analytic results, some graphs are plotted for determining the convergence of the solution. Also the graphical interpretation of velocity profiles corresponding to the effects of pertinent parameters are shown and discussed in detail. The numerical results are calculated for evaluation of the influence of fluid parameter. It can also be anticipated that the radial and axial velocity components show decreasing behavior due to rise in the values of couple stress parameter which conflict the behavior of the tangential component of velocity.

1 Introduction

The flow which appears due to a rotating disk has gained a significant amount of attention in many mathematical models and has become an intriguing topic in recent investigations. These types of flows have received practical importance in many engineering processes, such as spin-coating, revolving appliances, medical apparatus, computer storage instruments, turning viscometer, machinery radiating from a central point, draining of liquid metals, growth processes of a crystal, turbo devices and in many essentially aerodynamic operations.

The pioneering work related to the Newtonian fluid flow as a result of an infinite rotating disk was examined by Karman [1] in latent ambient. The Navier-Stokes equations which govern the flow diminished to a self-similar form by utilizing Karman’s transformation. Joshi et al. [2] considered the influences of porous medium on the Bodewadt flow of a magnetic nanofluid past through a uniformly heated stationary disk in the occurrence of geothermal viscosity. To analyze the important features for the unsteady convective flow, Ram et al. [3] presented the time-dependent three-dimensional boundary layer flow of nano-suspension by considering the effects of heat transfer. A comprehensive study related to the time-dependent boundary layer flow of a magnetic nanofluid over a rotating disk with the combined effects of thermal radiation and variable viscosity has been encountered by Joshi et al. [4]. An inclusive effort to examine the solution of the problem governing the time dependent boundary layer flow of magnetic nanofluids due to rotation of stretchable plate has been conferred by Ram et al. [5]. This flow has been discussed in the presence of a porous medium and inspected the effects of geothermal viscosity with viscous dissipation.Further, for inspecting the influence of porosity of the medium, the viscous incompressible fluid flow in the presence of temperature-dependent viscosity has been presented by Attia [6]. Ram and Kumar [7] has analyzed the ferrohydrodynamic laminar boundary flow of electrically non-conducting magnetic fluid over a disk surface which is radially stretchable. To examine the behavior of Bingham plastic fluid flow, Rashaida [8] has considered the problem which deals with the flow of a non-Newtonian Bingham plastic fluid due to the rotation of a disk. Andersson et al. [9] have investigated the axi-symmetric power-law fluid flow in the boundary layer consistently. The solution of the steady laminar flow of an incompressible viscous electrically conducting fluid on account of the rotation of a disk in the presence of a magnetic field has been accomplished by Turkyilmazoglu [10]. Sibanda and Makinde [11] have investigated the influences of magnetic field, electrical heating, viscous dissipation effect, Hall effect generated by the electric potential, and current due to ion slip in the steady flow occurring due to a rotating disk. The solution of the steady flow of an incompressible fluid past through a rotating disk with the influence of an external uniform magnetic field has been provided by Ariel [12]. Attia [13] has focused on the unsteady flow of a viscous fluid in the presence of a magnetic field. Moreover, the influences of suction or injection on the flow have also been explored. Khan and Riaz [14] have established an interesting analysis for the couple stress fluid flow near a stagnation point due to the rotation of a disk which is non-aligned. A study concerning the boundary layer flow of a couple stress fluid past through a continuous moving surface with the effect of heat transfer in the fluid flow has been attempted by Hayat et al. [15]. Furthermore, to find the exact solutions of different types of flows such as Couette, Poiseuille and generalized Couette flows for the couple stress fluid model, Devakar et al. [16] presented the analytical solutions for determining the flow behavior of the fluid along with slip boundary conditions. In general, less academic attention has been paid to observe the influence of couple stress fluid flow.

In recent years, many nonlinear problems have been extensively solved by utilizing the Homotopy Analysis Method (HAM) developed and refined by Liao [17]. This method has drawn the exclusive attention of many researchers, therefore, to analyze the convergence of the solution obtained by HAM, Hussain et al. [18] considered the impact of linear operator on the fluid flow problem by adopting a modified operator approach. The flow through stretching surface is of great significance due to its various utilizations in different fields. As a result, the unsteady flow induced due to a stretching surface with the effect of magnetic field has been inspected by Hayat et al. [19]. In addition, many analysts have served a comprehensive effort to acquire the solutions of equations as mentioned in [20] via Homotopy Analysis Method, implementation of HAM for solving the nonlinear problem [21] and analysis of the flow and heat transfer in the direction of a stretching sheet [22]. These studies enhance the efficiency and adaptability of HAM. In literature, many other new techniques can be found for solving ODEs and PDEs. Recently, a new integral transform method has been proposed and successfully applied on many physical problems [23, 24, 25].

Stokes has originated the couple stress fluid theory [26], which demonstrates the classical viscous fluid theory in generalized form that maintains couple stresses and the body couples. The present work focuses on the flow of couple stress fluid occurring due to the rotation of a disk and obtains the analytical solution of the problem under consideration. Our concern in the present paper is to find a highly accurate analytic solution of the considered problem followed by the implementation of HAM. Here, by utilizing HAM, the solution in the form of a series is first calculated and then the convergence region of the solution is observed. The graphical and tabular forms for the numerical results have been presented and discussed.

2 Mathematical formulation of the problem

Our interest here is to explore the axi-symmetric steady couple stress fluid flow as a result of the rotation of an infinite disk about its z axis as associated with the coordinates (r,ψ, z) in the cylindrical system along ω as an angular velocity. The r-axis is assumed to be parallel to the disk surface and the z-axis is taken perpendicularly to the direction of disk surface. Figure 1 shows the physical model of the considered problem, where νr, νψ and νz denote the velocity components in the radial (r), tangential (ψ) and axial (z) directions, respectively. Also ρ, v, p, and λ are the fluid density, kinematic viscosity coefficient, pressure, and couple stress parameter, respectively.

Fig. 1 Physical model and coordinate system
Fig. 1

Physical model and coordinate system

The constitutive partial differential equations can be given as:

.(νr,νψ,νz)=0.(1)
νrνrr+νzνrzνψ2r=1ρpr+v2νrr2+1rνrr+2νrz2νrr2+λρ2Lr2+2Lz2+1rLrLr2(2)
νrνψr+νzνψz+1rνrνψ=v2νψr2+1rνψr+2νψz2νψr2+λρ2Mr2+2Mz2+1rMrMr(3)
νrνrr+νzνzz=1ρpz+v2νzr2+1rνzr+2νzz2+λρ2Nr2+2Nz2+1rNr(4)

Subject to the boundary conditions [27] on the disk surface and the boundary conditions at infinity

νψ=rω,νr=νz=0,p=const=0,z=0(5)
νr=νψ=νzz=0,z=,(6)

where

L=2νr+2r2νψψ+νrr2,M=2νψ2r2νrψ+νψr2,N=2νz.

Using similarity transformation formulated by Karman [1], we have

νr=rωF(Λ),νψ=rωG(Λ),νz=vωH(Λ),p=ρvωP(Λ),Λ=zωv(7)

By the above transformation, Eqs. (1)-(4) reduces to:

FF2+G2HFβF(4)=0,(8)
GHG2FGβG(4)=0,(9)
HH+PH+βH(4)=0,(10)
H+2F=0,(11)

where β=λωv2ρ.

Here, prime of the functions gives differentiation with respect to Λ, subjected to the boundary conditions [27]:

F(0)=F()=0,G(0)=1,G()=0,H(0)=0,p(0)=0.(12)

According to Eq. (11), we have

F=H2.(13)

Substituting Eq. (13) into Eqs. (8) and (9), we have

βH(5)(Λ)(H(Λ)H(Λ)H(Λ)+12(H(Λ))22G2(Λ))=0,(14)
βG(4)(Λ)(G(Λ)H(Λ)G(Λ)+G(Λ)H(Λ))=0,(15)

with boundary conditions:

H(0)=H()=H()=H(0),G(0)=1,G()=0.(16)

3 Solution of the problem

To examine the precise and entirely analytic solutions of Eqs. (14)-(15) with the boundary conditions (16), using HAM, we have selected the following initial approximation ℋ0(Λ), 𝒢0 (Λ),

H0=1+eΛ(1+Λ),G0=eΛ(17)

and the auxiliary linear operators 1 and 2 as:

L1(H)=HH(18)
L2(G)=GG(19)

which fulfill the following characteristics:

L1[c1+c2eΛ+c3eΛ]=0(20)
L2[c4eΛ+c5eΛ]=0(21)

Here, c1, c2, c3, c4 and c5 are known as the arbitrary constants, p ∈ [0, 1] yields an embedding parameter, and ħ is the convergence control parameter. The zeroth–order deformation equations can be given as:

(1p)L1[H~(Λ,p)H~0(Λ)]=pN1[H~(Λ,p),G~(Λ,p)],(22)
(1p)L2[G~(Λ,p)H~0(Λ)]=pN2[H~(Λ,p),G~(Λ,p)].(23)

The boundary conditions for this deformation are:

H(Λ,0)=H0(Λ),H(Λ,1)=H(Λ)(24)
G(Λ,0)=G0(Λ),G(Λ,1)=G(Λ).(25)

On the basis of Eqs. (14)-(15), the leading operators 𝒩1 and 𝒩2 can be signified as:

N1=3H~(Λ,p)Λ3H~(Λ,p)2H~(Λ,p)Λ2+12H~(Λ,p)Λ22G~(Λ,p)2+β5H~(Λ,p)Λ5,(26)
N2=2G~(Λ,p)Λ2H~(Λ,p)G~(Λ,p)Λ+G~(Λ,p)H~(Λ,p)Λ+β4G~(Λ,p)Λ4(27)

By utilizing the Taylor’s series whenchangesthe values from 0 to 1, it can be shown that

H(Λ,p)=H0(Λ)+m=1Hm(Λ)pm,Hm(Λ)=1m!mH(Λ,p)pm|p=0,(28)
G(Λ,p)=G0(Λ)+m=1Gm(Λ)pm,Gm(Λ)=1m!mG(Λ,p)pm|p=0.(29)

The convergence of the aforementioned series given in Eqs. (28) and (29) is strictly based on ħ. The ħ values are to be chosen so that the series in Eqs. (28) and (29) have convergent behavior at p = 1 and hence Eqs. (24) and (25) yield

H(Λ)=H0(Λ)+m=1Hm(Λ),(30)
G(Λ)=G0(Λ)+m=1Gm(Λ).(31)

For the mth order deformation, differentiating Eqs. (26) and (27) m times with respect to the embedding parameter p and dividing them by m!, then set p = 0. The resulting deformation problems at the mth order are:

L1[Hm(Λ,p)ξmHm1(Λ)]=Rm(Λ)(32)
L2[Gm(Λ,p)ξmGm1(Λ)]=Qm(Λ)(33)
Hm(0)=Hm()=Hm(0)=0,Gm(0)=Gm()=0,(34)

where

Rm=βHm1′′′′′+Hm1i=0m1HiHm1i2i=0m1GiGm1i+12i=0m1HiHm1i
Qm=βGm1+Gm1i=0m1HiGm1i+i=0m1HiGm1iξm=0,m11,m>1

We have used the symbolic computation software MATHEMATICA 10 for the solutions of Eqs. (32) and (33) with boundary conditions (34).

4 Graphical and numerical results and discussion

The present work is concerned with the study of an incompressible steady flow of couple stress fluid due to the rotation of a disk. The main interest is to examine the analytical solution of the considered problem and analyze the flow behavior of the fluid. For the sake of clarity and precision, in this section, the comparability and the graphs of velocity profiles obtained via HAM have been conferred. A family of explicit analytic expressions involving auxiliary parameter has been presented by the infinite solution series as mentioned in Eqs. (32) and (33).The convergence area of the solutions and the rate of approximation for HAM depend on the values of parameter ħ. By selecting the appropriate value of ħ, which increases the credibility that the series solution approaches to its unique solution. The graphs of the curves related to the flow field parameters ″(0), 𝒢″(0), and ℋ″(0) are illustrated by taking the sufficient and convenient region of ħ for various values of couple stress parameter. By utilizing the converged conditions, the sufficient region for convergence of ħ relating to the line segments is nearly along the horizontal axis. Figures 2-4 show the ħ-curves obtained at the 15th order of HAM approximation and clearly expound that the range for the admissible values.

Fig. 2 The graph of ℱ″(0) against ħ for (a) β = 0.0 (Newtonian fluid) (b) β = 0.1 (c) β = 0.2
Fig. 2

The graph of ″(0) against ħ for (a) β = 0.0 (Newtonian fluid) (b) β = 0.1 (c) β = 0.2

Fig. 3 The ħ-curve of 𝒢″(0) for (a) β = 0 (Newtonian fluid) (b) β = 0.1 (c) β = 0.2
Fig. 3

The ħ-curve of 𝒢″(0) for (a) β = 0 (Newtonian fluid) (b) β = 0.1 (c) β = 0.2

Fig. 4 The graph of ℋ″(0) against ħ for (a) β = 0 (Newtonian fluid) (b) β = 0.1 (c) β = 0.2
Fig. 4

The graph of ℋ″(0) against ħ for (a) β = 0 (Newtonian fluid) (b) β = 0.1 (c) β = 0.2

In order to demonstrate our analytical solutions of couple stress fluid flow, it is worth mentioning to verify the numerical method. The extensive part of attention has purposely given to viscous fluid [27] which not only gives the reliability but also provide the way to go forward. Figure 5 depicts the dimensionless velocity profiles for Karman flow of viscous fluid. The main result here is to note the influence of couple stress parameter β on the radial, tangential, axial velocity profiles, and pressure distribution, and hence we analyze these important characteristics of the problem. For this purpose, the following graphs have been sketched.

Fig. 5 Dimensionless velocity and pressure profile for Karman viscous fluid (data taken from [27])
Fig. 5

Dimensionless velocity and pressure profile for Karman viscous fluid (data taken from [27])

It can be observed from Figure 6 that the dimensionless velocity component exhibits decreasing behavior by rising in the values of couple stress parameter β nearly to the surface of the disk. The tangential component of velocity 𝒢 is noticed to increase with increase in couple stress parameter at any given tangential point over the disk surface as illustrated in Figure 7. As we maximize the values of couple stress parameter, it becomes the cause of decreasing the axial velocity component ℋ at all the points located above the disk surface as depicted in Figure 8. It can be deduced from Figure 9 that the pressure exceeds as the couple stress parameter β increases.

Fig. 6 Influence of couple stress parameter on ℱ
Fig. 6

Influence of couple stress parameter on

Fig. 7 Influence of couple stress parameter on 𝒢
Fig. 7

Influence of couple stress parameter on 𝒢

Fig. 8 Influence of couple stress parameter on ℋ
Fig. 8

Influence of couple stress parameter on ℋ

Fig. 9 Influence of couple stress parameter on 𝒫
Fig. 9

Influence of couple stress parameter on 𝒫

Figure 10 gives the comparison of velocity, temperature, and pressure profiles for ħ = –1 in HAM, which is the traditional homotopy perturbation method, with NDSolve values for viscous fluid. It is clearly observed that this choice of ħ value is not accurate and some other value must be selected from the range discussed in Figures 2-4.

Fig. 10 Graphical comparison for ħ = –1 in HAM with NDSolve results
Fig. 10

Graphical comparison for ħ = –1 in HAM with NDSolve results

As mentioned afore, the thickness δ can be regarded as the point where the circumferential velocity vψ drops to 1 percent of its wall value or 𝒢 ≈ 0.01, which appears at around the value of Λ ≈ 5.4 then the layer thickness for viscous flow is δ ≈ 5.4 vω. The thickness δ for couple stress fluid occurs at Λ ≈ 5.9 and its layer thickness is δ ≈ 5.9 vω..

The asymptotic value for viscous flow is ℋ(∈) = –0.8838 and it is clear that the fluid is drawn from the disk surface at the rate vr (∞) = –0.8838 vω and for the couple stress fluid asymptotic value is ℋ(∈) = –0.836136, therefore the fluid is drawn from disk towards it at the rate vz (∞) = –0.836136 vω. Hence, both the viscosity and angular velocity increases the disk’s pumping action. The disk surface has the circumferential wall shear stress as follows:

τzψ=μvψz|z=0=ρrG0vω3,(35)

where G0 = –0.6159 for viscous flow and G0 = –0.623153 for couple stress fluid from the table.

5 Conclusion

In this paper, we have presented the swirling flow of couple stress fluid occurring due to the rotation of a disk. The Karman’s similarity transformation has been implemented for converting the partial differential equations into the ordinary differential equations which are further solved by the analytical technique HAM. Moreover, it is also of significance to present the results for the illustration of the flow characteristics associated with the velocity and pressure profiles. The variations on velocity profiles have also been observed by taking various values of the couple stress parameter. Numerical values on which the results have been evaluated are given in the form of Table 1. The following outcomes have been extracted from the above mentioned work:

Table 1

The numerical result at β = 0.1 and for viscous flow i.e., at β = 0. (Values inside the bracket evaluating at β = 0)

Λ𝒢𝒢′P
0.000.000.43804201.0000000–0.62315300.000.00127331
(0.00)(0.5102300)(1.0000000)(–0.6159200)(–0.00)(0.00)
0.100.039646500.35678600.93857100.6046910–0.0041000400.0955010
(0.0462000)(0.4163000)(0.9386000)(–0.6112000)(–0.0048000)(0.0924000s)
0.200.07171760.28634500.8791860–0.5825080–0.015353800.1714510
(0.0836000)(0.3380000)(0.8780000)(–0.5987000)(–0.0179000)(0.1674000)
0.300.09723870.22560400.8221540–0.5577800–0.032350700.2314990
(0.1133000)(0.2620000)(0.1890000)(–0.5803000)(–0.0377000)(0.2274000)
0.400.11712700.17352000.7676830–0.5314400–0.05387400.2780240
(0.1364000)(0.1999000)(0.7621000)(–0.5577000)(–0.0628000)(0.2747000)
0.500.13219900.12912600.7158950–0.5042280–0.078880600.3132820
(0.1536000)(0.1467000)(0.7075000)(–0.5321000)(–0.0919000)(0.3115000)
0.600.14317900.091529700.6668470–0.4767190–0.10648100.3393430
(0.1660000)(0.1015000)(0.6557000)(–0.5047000)(–0.1239000)(0.3396000)
0.700.15070400.059914400.6205460–0.4493580–0.13592200.3580410
(0.1742000)(0.0635000)(0.6067000)(–0.4763000)(–0.1580000)(0.3608000)
0.800.155533600.03353700.5769590–0.4224820–0.16657000.3709580
(0.1789000)(0.0317000)(0.5605000)(–0.4476000)(–0.1933000)(0.3764000)
0.900.15756400.0111725200.5360250–0.3963400–0.19789600.3794320
(0.1807000)(0.0056000)(0.5171000)(–0.4191000)(–0.2293000)(0.3877000)
1.000.1578130–0.006126150.4976610–0.3711120–0.22946400.3845620
(0.1801000)(–0.0157000)(0.4766000)(–0.3911000)(–0.2655000)(0.3955000)
1.200.1537990–0.03205360.4282390–0.3238520–0.29195800.3881650
(0.1737000)(–0.0461000)(0.4037000)(–0.3381000)(–0.3364000)(0.4040000)
1.400.1456620–0.04789200.3678110–0.2812170–0.35195600.3868250
(0.1625000)(–0.0640000)(0.3411000)(–0.2898000)(–0.4038000)(0.4066000)
1.600.1351240–0.05648120.3154390–0.2432790–0.40817000.3348600
(0.1487000)(–0.0728000)(0.2875000)(–0.2470000)(–0.4661000)(0.4061000)
1.800.1234070–0.05999340.2701980–0.2098530–0.45990000.3797150
(0.1338000)(–0.0754000)(0.2419000)(–0.2095000)(–0.5226000)(0.4042000)
2.000.1135600–0.06006060.2312180–0.1806150–0.50685300.3762490
(0.1188000)(–0.0739000)(0.2034000)(–0.1771000)(–0.5732000)(0.4019000)
2.200.0995315–0.05788750.1976990–0.1555760–0.54901600.3733580
(0.1044000)(–0.0698000)(0.1708000)(–0.1494000)(–0.6178000)(0.3997000)
2.400.0882911–0.05434700.1689210–0.1331330–0.58655600.3710810
(0.0910000)(–0.0643000)(0.1433000)(–0.1258000)(–0.6568000)(0.3977000)
2.600.0778422–0.05005860.1442460–0.1140900–0.61975400.3693520
(0.0788000)(–0.0580000)(0.1202000)(–0.1057000)(–0.6907000)(0.3961000)
2.800.0682887–0.04545140.1231100–0.0976795–0.64895000.3680710
(0.0678000)(–0.0517000)(0.1008000)(–0.0888000)(–0.7200000)(0.3948000)
3.000.0596634–0.04081410.1050210–0.0835632–0.67450900.3671390
(0.0581000)(–0.0455000)(0.0845000)(–0.0746000)(–0.7452000)(0.3938000)
3.200.0519524–0.03633280.0895518–0.0714386–0.69680300.3664680
(0.0496000)(–0.0397000)(0.0709000)(–0.0625000)(–0.7666000)(0.3930000)
3.400.0451123–0.03212040.0763309–0.0610373–0.71618700.3659900
(0.0422000)(–0.0344000)(0.0594000)(–0.0525000)(–0.7850000)(0.3924000)
3.600.0390822–0.02823870.0650378–0.0521232–0.73300000.3656510
(0.0358000)(–0.0296000)(0.0498000)(–0.0440000)(–0.8005000)(0.3920000)
3.800.0337929–0.02471420.0553963–0.0444901–0.74752200.3654120
(0.0303000)(–0.0254000)(0.0417000)(–0.0369000)(–0.8137000)(0.3917000)
4.000.0291724–0.02154990.0471684–0.0379585–0.76012400.3652440
(0.0256000)(–0.0217000)(0.0349000)(–0.0309000)(–0.8249000)(0.3914000)
4.500.0200897–0.01511550.0315126–0.0254795–0.78448700.3650120
(0.0167000)(–0.0144000)(0.0225000)(–0.0199000)(–0.8457000)(0.3911000)
5.000.0137576–0.0104760.0210146–0.0170660–0.812180000.3649170
(0.0108000)(–0.009500)(0.0144000)(–0.0128000)(–0.8594000)(0.3910000)
5.500.00938588–0.007205430.0139896–0.0114084–0.81265400.3648780
(0.0070000)(–0.0062000)(0.0093000)(–0.0082000)(–0.8682000)(0.3910000)
6.000.00638651–0.004931420.00929752–0.00761233–0.82044500.3648620
(0.0045000)(–0.0040000)(0.0059000)(–0.0053000)(–0.8739000)(0.3909000)
7.000.00294084–0.002289210.00408721–0.00337178–0.82933600.3648530
(0.0018000)(–0.0017000)(0.0024000)(–0.0022000)(–0.8799000)(0.3909000)
8.000.0013469–0.001054960.00178594–0.0014838–0.83342000.3648510
(0.0007000)(–0.0007000)(0.0010000)(–0.0009000)(–0.8824000)(0.3908000)
0.000614031–0.0004837210.000775944–0.000648973–0.83528700.3648510
(0.0002000)(–0.0003000)(0.0004000)(–0.0004000)(–0.8834000)(0.3908000)
10.000.000278655–0.0002208020.000335316–0.000282202–0.83613600.3648510
(0.0001000)(–0.0001000)(0.0001000)(–0.0001000)(–0.8838000)(0.3907000)
0.0000000–0.00000000.0000000–0.0000000–0.83613600.3648500
(0.0000000)(–0.0000000)(0.0000000)(–0.0000000)(–0.8838000)(0.3906000)

  1. The 15th order approximation for a series solution is obtained in Table 1.

  2. The inverse relation has been observed on radial and axial components of velocity, because the rising values of couple stress parameter produce the decreasing effects on the radial and axial velocity components. But in contrast, it causes to increase the pressure.

  3. The couple stress parameter increases the values of the tangential component of velocity.

References

[1] T. Von Karman, Uber laminare und turbulence reibung, Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 1(1921) 233–252.10.1002/zamm.19210010401Search in Google Scholar

[2] V.K. Joshi, P. Ram, R.K. Sharma, D. Tripathi, Porosity effect on the boundary layer Bodewadt flow of a magnetic nanofluid in the presence of geothermal viscosity, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 132: 254 (2017).10.1140/epjp/i2017-11511-0Search in Google Scholar

[3] P. Ram, V.K. Joshi, O.D. Makinde, Unsteady convective flow of hydrocarbon magnetite nano-suspension in the presence of stretching effects, Defect and Diffusion Forum, 377 (2017) 155-165.10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.377.155Search in Google Scholar

[4] V.K. Joshi, P. Ram, D. Tripathi, K. Sharma, Numerical investigation of magnetic nanofluids flow over rotating disk embedded in a porous medium, Therm. Sci., (2017), org/10.2298/TSCI170323139J.Search in Google Scholar

[5] P. Ram, V.K. Joshi, K. Sharma, M. Walia, N. Yadav, Variable viscosity effects on time dependent magnetic nanofluid flow past a stretchable rotating plate, Open Phys., 14 (1) (2016) 651-658.10.1515/phys-2016-0072Search in Google Scholar

[6] H.A. Attia, Unsteady flow and heat transfer of viscous incompressible fluid with temperature-dependent viscosity due to a rotating disk in a porous medium. J. Phys. A: Math Gen., 39 (2006) 979-991.10.1088/0305-4470/39/4/017Search in Google Scholar

[7] P. Ram, V. Kumar, FHD flow with heat transfer over a stretchable rotating disk, Multidscip. Model. Mater. Struct., 9(4) (2013) 524-537.10.1108/MMMS-03-2013-0013Search in Google Scholar

[8] A.A. Rashaida, Flow of a non-Newtonian Bingham plastic fluid over a rotating disk, Ph.D. thesis, University of Saskatchewan (2005).Search in Google Scholar

[9] H.I. Andersson, E. de Korte, R. Meland, Flow of a power-law fluid over a rotating disk revisited, Fluid Dyn. Res., 28 (2001) 75–88.10.1016/S0169-5983(00)00018-6Search in Google Scholar

[10] M. Turkyilmazoglu, The MHD boundary layer flow due to a rough rotating disk, Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 90 (2010) 72–82.10.1002/zamm.200900259Search in Google Scholar

[11] P. Sibanda, OD. Makinde, On steady MHD flow and heat transfer past a rotating disk in aporous medium with Ohmic heating and viscous dissipation, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow, 20 (2010) 269-285.10.1108/09615531011024039Search in Google Scholar

[12] P.D. Ariel, On computation of MHD flow near a rotating-disk, Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 82 (2001) 235-246.10.1002/1521-4001(200204)82:4<235::AID-ZAMM235>3.0.CO;2-LSearch in Google Scholar

[13] H.A. Attia, Unsteady MHD flow near a rotating porous disk with uniform suction or injection, Fluid Dyn. Res., 23 (1998) 283–90.10.1016/S0169-5983(98)80011-7Search in Google Scholar

[14] N.A. Khan, F. Riaz, Off-centered stagnation point flow of a couple stress fluid towards a rotating disk, The Sci. World J., 2014 (2014)163586.10.1155/2014/163586Search in Google Scholar

[15] T. Hayat, Z. Iqbal, M. Qasim, O.M. Aldossary, Heat transfer in a couple stress fluid over a continuous moving surface with internal heat generation and convective boundary conditions, 67a (2012) 217-224.10.5560/zna.2012-0021Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. Devakar, D. Sreenivasu, B. Shankar, Analytical solutions of couple stress fluid flows with slip boundary conditions, Alexandria Eng. J., 53 (2014) 723-730.10.1016/j.aej.2014.06.005Search in Google Scholar

[17] S.J. Liao, The proposed homotopy analysis technique for the solution of nonlinear problems, Ph.D. thesis, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, (1992).Search in Google Scholar

[18] S.T. Hussain, S. Nadeem, M. Qasim, Impact of linear operator on the convergence of HAM solution: a modified operator approach, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 8 (3) (2016) 499-516.10.4208/aamm.2014.m809Search in Google Scholar

[19] T. Hayat, M. Qasim, Z. Abbas, Homotopy solution for the unsteady three-dimensional MHD flow and mass transfer in a porous space, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 15 (9) (2010) 2375-2387.10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.09.013Search in Google Scholar

[20] M.M. Rashidi, G. Domairry, S Dinarvand, Approximate solutions for the Burger and regularized long wave equations by means of the homotopy analysis method, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 14 (2009) 708-717.10.1016/j.cnsns.2007.09.015Search in Google Scholar

[21] S. Abbasbandy, Approximate solution of the nonlinear model of diffusion and reaction catalysts by means of the homotopy analysis method, Chem. Eng. J., 136 (2008) 144–150.10.1016/j.cej.2007.03.022Search in Google Scholar

[22] N.A. Khan, M. Jamil, Nadeem A. Khan, Effect of slip factor on unsteady stagnation-point flow and heat transfer towards a stretching sheet: an analytical study, Heat Transfer Res., 43 (2012) 779-794.10.1615/HeatTransRes.2012004962Search in Google Scholar

[23] X.J. Yang, A new integral transform method for solving steady heat-transfer problem, Thermal Sci., 20 (2016) S639-S642.10.2298/TSCI16S3639YSearch in Google Scholar

[24] X.J. Yang, A new integral transform operator for solving the heat-diffusion problem, Appl. Math Letters, 64 (2017) 193-197.10.1016/j.aml.2016.09.011Search in Google Scholar

[25] X. Liang, F. Gao, Y.N. Gao, X.J. Yang, Applications of a novel integral transform to partial differential equations, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 10 (2017) 528-534.10.22436/jnsa.010.02.18Search in Google Scholar

[26] V.K. Stokes, Couple Stresses in fluid, The Phy of fluids, 9 (1966) 1709-1715.10.1007/978-3-642-82351-0_4Search in Google Scholar

[27] F.M. White, Viscous fluid flow, 2nd edition McGraw-Hill New York.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-05-22
Revised: 2017-12-06
Accepted: 2018-04-19
Published Online: 2018-07-12
Published in Print: 2019-01-28

© 2019 N.A. Khan et al., published by De Gruyter.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Chebyshev Operational Matrix Method for Lane-Emden Problem
  2. Concentrating solar power tower technology: present status and outlook
  3. Control of separately excited DC motor with series multi-cells chopper using PI - Petri nets controller
  4. Effect of boundary roughness on nonlinear saturation of Rayleigh-Taylor instability in couple-stress fluid
  5. Effect of Heterogeneity on Imbibition Phenomena in Fluid Flow through Porous Media with Different Porous Materials
  6. Electro-osmotic flow of a third-grade fluid past a channel having stretching walls
  7. Heat transfer effect on MHD flow of a micropolar fluid through porous medium with uniform heat source and radiation
  8. Local convergence for an eighth order method for solving equations and systems of equations
  9. Numerical techniques for behavior of incompressible flow in steady two-dimensional motion due to a linearly stretching of porous sheet based on radial basis functions
  10. Influence of Non-linear Boussinesq Approximation on Natural Convective Flow of a Power-Law Fluid along an Inclined Plate under Convective Thermal Boundary Condition
  11. A reliable analytical approach for a fractional model of advection-dispersion equation
  12. Mass transfer around a slender drop in a nonlinear extensional flow
  13. Hydromagnetic Flow of Heat and Mass Transfer in a Nano Williamson Fluid Past a Vertical Plate With Thermal and Momentum Slip Effects: Numerical Study
  14. A Study on Convective-Radial Fins with Temperature-dependent Thermal Conductivity and Internal Heat Generation
  15. An effective technique for the conformable space-time fractional EW and modified EW equations
  16. Fractional variational iteration method for solving time-fractional Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation
  17. New exact and numerical solutions for the effect of suction or injection on flow of nanofluids past a stretching sheet
  18. Numerical investigation of MHD stagnation-point flow and heat transfer of sodium alginate non-Newtonian nanofluid
  19. A New Finance Chaotic System, its Electronic Circuit Realization, Passivity based Synchronization and an Application to Voice Encryption
  20. Analysis of Heat Transfer and Lifting Force in a Ferro-Nanofluid Based Porous Inclined Slider Bearing with Slip Conditions
  21. Application of QLM-Rational Legendre collocation method towards Eyring-Powell fluid model
  22. Hyperbolic rational solutions to a variety of conformable fractional Boussinesq-Like equations
  23. MHD nonaligned stagnation point flow of second grade fluid towards a porous rotating disk
  24. Nonlinear Dynamic Response of an Axially Functionally Graded (AFG) Beam Resting on Nonlinear Elastic Foundation Subjected to Moving Load
  25. Swirling flow of couple stress fluid due to a rotating disk
  26. MHD stagnation point slip flow due to a non-linearly moving surface with effect of non-uniform heat source
  27. Effect of aligned magnetic field on Casson fluid flow over a stretched surface of non-uniform thickness
  28. Nonhomogeneous porosity and thermal diffusivity effects on stability and instability of double-diffusive convection in a porous medium layer: Brinkman Model
  29. Magnetohydrodynamic(MHD) Boundary Layer Flow of Eyring-Powell Nanofluid Past Stretching Cylinder With Cattaneo-Christov Heat Flux Model
  30. On the connection coefficients and recurrence relations arising from expansions in series of modified generalized Laguerre polynomials: Applications on a semi-infinite domain
  31. An adaptive mesh method for time dependent singularly perturbed differential-difference equations
  32. On stretched magnetic flow of Carreau nanofluid with slip effects and nonlinear thermal radiation
  33. Rational exponential solutions of conformable space-time fractional equal-width equations
  34. Simultaneous impacts of Joule heating and variable heat source/sink on MHD 3D flow of Carreau-nanoliquids with temperature dependent viscosity
  35. Effect of magnetic field on imbibition phenomenon in fluid flow through fractured porous media with different porous material
  36. Impact of ohmic heating on MHD mixed convection flow of Casson fluid by considering Cross diffusion effect
  37. Mathematical Modelling Comparison of a Reciprocating, a Szorenyi Rotary, and a Wankel Rotary Engine
  38. Surface roughness effect on thermohydrodynamic analysis of journal bearings lubricated with couple stress fluids
  39. Convective conditions and dissipation on Tangent Hyperbolic fluid over a chemically heating exponentially porous sheet
  40. Unsteady Carreau-Casson fluids over a radiated shrinking sheet in a suspension of dust and graphene nanoparticles with non-Fourier heat flux
  41. An efficient numerical algorithm for solving system of Lane–Emden type equations arising in engineering
  42. New numerical method based on Generalized Bessel function to solve nonlinear Abel fractional differential equation of the first kind
  43. Numerical Study of Viscoelastic Micropolar Heat Transfer from a Vertical Cone for Thermal Polymer Coating
  44. Analysis of Bifurcation and Chaos of the Size-dependent Micro–plate Considering Damage
  45. Non-Similar Comutational Solutions for Double-Diffusive MHD Transport Phenomena for Non-Newtnian Nanofluid From a Horizontal Circular Cylinder
  46. Mathematical model on distributed denial of service attack through Internet of things in a network
  47. Postbuckling behavior of functionally graded CNT-reinforced nanocomposite plate with interphase effect
  48. Study of Weakly nonlinear Mass transport in Newtonian Fluid with Applied Magnetic Field under Concentration/Gravity modulation
  49. MHD slip flow of chemically reacting UCM fluid through a dilating channel with heat source/sink
  50. A Study on Non-Newtonian Transport Phenomena in Mhd Fluid Flow From a Vertical Cone With Navier Slip and Convective Heating
  51. Penetrative convection in a fluid saturated Darcy-Brinkman porous media with LTNE via internal heat source
  52. Traveling wave solutions for (3+1) dimensional conformable fractional Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation with power law nonlinearity
  53. Semitrailer Steering Control for Improved Articulated Vehicle Manoeuvrability and Stability
  54. Thermomechanical nonlinear stability of pressure-loaded CNT-reinforced composite doubly curved panels resting on elastic foundations
  55. Combination synchronization of fractional order n-chaotic systems using active backstepping design
  56. Vision-Based CubeSat Closed-Loop Formation Control in Close Proximities
  57. Effect of endoscope on the peristaltic transport of a couple stress fluid with heat transfer: Application to biomedicine
  58. Unsteady MHD Non-Newtonian Heat Transfer Nanofluids with Entropy Generation Analysis
  59. Mathematical Modelling of Hydromagnetic Casson non-Newtonian Nanofluid Convection Slip Flow from an Isothermal Sphere
  60. Influence of Joule Heating and Non-Linear Radiation on MHD 3D Dissipating Flow of Casson Nanofluid past a Non-Linear Stretching Sheet
  61. Radiative Flow of Third Grade Non-Newtonian Fluid From A Horizontal Circular Cylinder
  62. Application of Bessel functions and Jacobian free Newton method to solve time-fractional Burger equation
  63. A reliable algorithm for time-fractional Navier-Stokes equations via Laplace transform
  64. A multiple-step adaptive pseudospectral method for solving multi-order fractional differential equations
  65. A reliable numerical algorithm for a fractional model of Fitzhugh-Nagumo equation arising in the transmission of nerve impulses
  66. The expa function method and the conformable time-fractional KdV equations
  67. Comment on the paper: “Thermal radiation and chemical reaction effects on boundary layer slip flow and melting heat transfer of nanofluid induced by a nonlinear stretching sheet, M.R. Krishnamurthy, B.J. Gireesha, B.C. Prasannakumara, and Rama Subba Reddy Gorla, Nonlinear Engineering 2016, 5(3), 147-159”
  68. Three-Dimensional Boundary layer Flow and Heat Transfer of a Fluid Particle Suspension over a Stretching Sheet Embedded in a Porous Medium
  69. MHD three dimensional flow of Oldroyd-B nanofluid over a bidirectional stretching sheet: DTM-Padé Solution
  70. MHD Convection Fluid and Heat Transfer in an Inclined Micro-Porous-Channel
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/nleng-2017-0062/html
Scroll to top button