Mechanical properties of laminated bamboo composite as a sustainable green material for fishing vessel: Correlation of layer configuration in various mechanical tests

3.1 Material selections and characteristics

3.1.1 Apus bamboo (Gigantochloa apus)

Bamboo is a grass-root plant that grows significantly in Indonesia. Most of the bamboo plants are in rural areas. As a tropical natural resource, there are many variations in bamboo, easy to obtain, fast-growing, and used in people’s daily lives as a sustainable source [20,21]. In Southeast Asia, bamboo is used as a building material and for making various vegetable baskets. Other usages include papermaking, musical instruments, handicrafts, and boat/shipbuilding. [20]. Apus bamboo is used as a structural material to replace wood on the fishing vessel in this case. This type of bamboo is very abundant in terms of availability [22]. Apus bamboo has a sympodial clump, tight and upright, and has a diameter of 4–15 cm according to soil fertility, and can grow up to 22 m. It usually thrives on river banks and hilly slopes from lowlands to highlands (±1,300 m asl).

Bamboo lamina of Gigantochloa apus was used as the primary reinforcement material. Bamboo was collected and harvested from natural forests in the Getasan area, Salatiga Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. The bamboo used was 3 years old with an average diameter of 150 mm. The selected part of the bamboo stem, 1 m from the base to 4 m, was used to make the lamina. Previous research stated the mechanical properties of Apus bamboo: air content 12–15%, a specific gravity value of 0.59 g/cm³, a bending strength of 502.3–1240.3 kgf/cm², a modulus of elasticity (MOE) of 57.515–121.334 kgf/cm², and a tensile strength of 1,231–2,859 kgf/cm² [18]. Apus bamboo lamina-making process is illustrated in detail in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Bamboo lamina-making process.

3.2 Material manufacture and testing

3.2.1 Steps of manufacturing laminated bamboo boards

The initial step in manufacturing laminated boards was to make bamboo strips of Apus bamboo, with various blade widths and thicknesses, namely, 1, 1.5, and 2 mm. Bamboo stalks were chopped at the height of 1 m above the ground. The portion of the stem used for the study was located 1–4.5 m above the ground. The bamboo was cut crosswise (cross-cutting) according to the length of the section (40 cm). After splitting the bamboo stalks into blades, the outer shell was removed to create bamboo slats. The splitting method was then carried out to generate a 40 cm × 20 mm bamboo blade. The 4-sided planning tool was used to produce the bamboo lamina blades to achieve thicknesses of 1, 1.5, and 2 mm. The bamboo laminas were then maintained by soaking them with a preservative solution containing 2.5% sodium tetraborate. The bamboo laminas were dried after preservation in an oven until the water content reached 10%. The percentage of water content in the bamboo laminas was determined using a moisture meter. Depending on the weather, drying in an oven takes 4–6 h until the moisture content of the material becomes less than 13%. Dry bamboo slats were grouped by thickness and sanded to smooth the surface with a sandpaper machine. The dried bamboo laminas were then utilised to manufacture LBCs as reinforcing composites.

As a matrix/adhesive substance, an epoxy resin polymer was employed. Hand lay-up techniques were made with 3 different numbers of bamboo laminas: 3, 5, and 7, with the fibres running parallel to each other (45°/−45°). For the initial layer, epoxy glue was used to smooth the whole surface of the bamboo uniformly. For the second layer, the entire fibreglass mat was covered with epoxy resin. The bamboo slats and fibreglass mats that have been cut and formed into boards were aligned based on the size and arrangement of the laminated bamboo slats’ fibres. A cold press machine was used for pressing at a pressure of 2 MPa, or the equivalent of 30 bar. When the press pressure had reached the desired level, the bolts on the mould’s iron clamp were tightened. Laminated bamboo planks that had been crushed were placed in the clamp for 24 h before being removed to enhance the adhesion between the layers. Figure 2 shows the comparison of 40 cm × 20 cm sized LBC for different numbers of layers, and the formation of the bamboo lamina is presented in Figure 3.

Figure 2

Laminated bamboo – fibreglass boards: (a) 3 layers, (b) 5 layers, and (c) 7 layers.

Figure 3

(a) Laminae shape of the Apus bamboo and (b) LBC making process [1].

The layer configuration and mass fraction of LBCs are presented in Table 5. The composites had the same thickness with different numbers of bamboo and fibreglass layers. LBCs with 7 layers had a larger mass fraction of epoxy resin matrix than 5 layers and 3 layers bamboo composites. Mass fraction of specimen with 3 layers comprised of 25 wt% epoxy resin and 75% bamboo lamina. Specimen with 5 layers had 30 wt% epoxy resin and 70 wt% bamboo lamina, and specimens with 7 layers had 35 wt% epoxy resin and 65 wt% bamboo lamina. The mass fraction of a substance (percentage by weight/wt%) within a mixture is the ratio of the mass of that substance (m _i ) to the total mass of the mixture (m _tot). It was found that the number of layers will increase the mass fraction of the epoxy resin matrix. Apus bamboo fibre had a density of 0.60 g/cm³ in dry conditions, while the epoxy resin had a density of 1.27 g/cm³. LBCs with the highest layers were formed from bamboo fibres with a thinner thickness (1 mm).

Table 5

Layer configuration of LBC

Layer configurations	Composite lamina thickness (mm)	Bamboo layer and orientation	CSM layer and orientation	Mass fraction (wt%)
	10	3 layers (45°/−45°/45°) orientation	2 (random)	25% epoxy resin
		2 mm thickness		75% bamboo lamina
	10	5 layers (45°/−45°/45°/−45°/45°) orientation	4 (random)	30% epoxy resin
		1.5 mm thickness		70% bamboo lamina
	10	7 layers 45°/−45°/45°/−45°/45°/−45°/45° orientation	6 (random)	35% epoxy resin
		1 mm thickness		65% bamboo lamina

3.2.2 The testing procedure of LBC

Several mechanical tests, including tensile, bending, impact, V-notched beam, and lap shear tests, were conducted to investigate the mechanical behaviour of LBCs under different layers, as seen in Figure 4. The Charpy impact test aimed to assess the brittle performances of the laminated bamboo material when subjected to an impact load. The Charpy impact machine model DB-300A, DongGuan HongTuo Instrument Co., Ltd, Dongguan, China, determined the amount of energy absorbed by a standard notched specimen when it breaks under an impact load. In the impact test, the dimension size of the rectangular test specimen was 63 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm rectangular test object with a notch angle of 45°/−45°, as presented in Figure 5a. The impact test based on ASTM D256 [25] was conducted at the Materials and Construction Laboratory, Department of Naval Architecture, Diponegoro University, Indonesia. The impact energy of 150 J (little hammer), the impact speed of 5.2 m/s, and the pendulum angle of 150° were used. The impact strength for each variation was an average of five test specimens.

Figure 4

The different testing schemes of LBCs: (a) impact test, (b) flexural test, (c) tensile test, (d) V-notched beam test, and (e) shear test.

Figure 5

Specimen dimensions: (a) impact test, (b) tensile test, (c) bending test, (d) V-notched beam test, and (e) lap shear test.

Besides the impact test, bending test was carried out to obtain information on the strength of the material using the three-point bending method. Tests were carried out with universal testing machine (UTM) type WE-1000B, Yufeng, Zhejiang, China, with a maximum capacity of 1,000 kN. The specimen size was 130 mm × 13 mm × 10 mm, as seen in Figure 5b. The specimen dimensions and testing procedure used ASTM D7264 [26]. Bending strength on each specimen was the average of five samples tested.

A tensile test was carried out to determine the tensile strength of LBC with a testing procedure using ASTM standard D3039 [27]. The specimen size of 150 mm × 50 mm × 10 mm was prepared using water jet cutting, as seen in Figure 5c. UTM type WE-1000B, Zhejiang, China, with a maximum capacity of 1,000 kN, is used. The bottom side of the test specimen was clamped on a testing machine, with the loading slowly increasing to a particular load until the test object broke. The tensile test results provided tensile strength and modulus elasticity of specimens with different layers.

Moreover, the V-notched beam test was conducted to obtain shear strength that causes the component to be damaged/fractured due to shear loads. The test was utilised to ascertain the composite materials’ in-plane shear properties. In this test method, a sample with V notches was subjected to an asymmetrical four-point compression load, allowing for the delivery of just shear stress to the evaluation area. The specimen dimensions were 76 mm × 10 mm × 20 mm, as presented in Figure 5d. The tests were carried out on tensile testing machines using special auxiliary equipment. The V-notched shear apparatus, which included a test machine adaptor, fixture halves, and grasping blots, was developed to carry out the shear tests. The V-notched shear specimen was positioned by the gripping bolts after being inserted into the two fixture sections. Each half of the constructed fixture was connected to the testing machine heads using the test machine adaptor. The relative displacement between the two fixture parts causes shear stresses to develop in the notched specimen when the testing apparatus extends the two halves of the constructed fixture. Displacement control was applied at a 2 mm/min speed during the shear tests. The specimen dimension and testing procedure used ASTM D7078 [28].

At last, a lap shear test was conducted to determine the shear strength of adhesives for bonding materials on a single-lap-joint specimen. It is typically used to measure the strength of epoxy resin glues and measures their strength when a load is applied. The lap shear test is one of the approaches for simulating real-world loading situations. Two samples, or specimens, are bonded together before tensile force is applied to pull until shear occurs. In this case, the specimen dimensions were 100 mm × 25 mm × 10 mm, as presented in Figure 5e. Lap shear tests were performed on tensile testing machines using special auxiliary equipment. The specimen dimension and testing procedure used ASTM D5868 [29].

4.1 Flexural test result under different numbers of bamboo layers

Flexural testing was carried out to determine the ability of the test sample to withstand the maximum bending load until the test specimen fractures. Figure 6 shows the comparative result of the three-point flexural test between the present study and previous investigation by Manik et al. [1] under different configurations of laminated bamboo layers. The material selections, the manufacturing process of LBCs, and testing specimens and procedures were similar to the previous study. The present result will be compared with the previous study under the same compaction pressure of 2 MPa. From a previous study [1], based on the previous result, LBCs with a pressure of 2 MPa produce the highest mechanical properties compared to LBCs with a pressure of 1.5 and 2.5 MPa. Figures 6 and 7 show a similar result: increasing the number of laminas increases the bending strength and modulus of LBCs. LBCs with a thinner and higher number of laminas provide a higher adhesive contact surface area than the thicker lamina. The highest tensile strength is achieved by LBCs with the laminates’ direction 0° (on-axis laminates), 7 lamina layers with 1 mm lamina thickness.

Figure 6

Comparison of bending strength under different numbers of layers.

Figure 7

Comparison of bending modulus under different numbers of layers.

The result of the present study using 45°/−45° layer orientation shows similar characteristics to the previous tensile test result with 3 different layer orientations. The specimen with 7 layers had the highest bending strength with a value of 282 MPa compared with other specimens. The specimen with 5 layers and 3 layers experienced a decreased trend, about 1.26 and 6.25%, respectively. The increase in tensile strength value with the number of layers was due to the differences in the mass fraction of the epoxy resin matrix. The higher the number of layers, the more the mass fraction/volume fraction of epoxy resin. LBCs with 7 layers had higher composition of epoxy resin than 5 layers and 3 layers of composite bamboo composites.

Compared to the previous bending strength result by Manik et al. [1], adding a fibreglass mat layer into the LBCs with 45°/−45° layer orientation caused an increasing trend in bending strength in all bamboo laminated layer variations. The result showed that the addition of fibreglass mat in 3 layers caused an increase of about 7.56%. A similar trend was also found in adding fibreglass mat in 5 layers and 7 layers. It was analysed that both materials experienced an increase of about 4.64 and 4.02%, respectively. It had been discovered that adding a fibreglass mat significantly impacted the LBC with thinner and thicker bamboo lamina. As the number of laminated bamboo layers increased, the effect of fibreglass addition gradually decreased. Further, the addition of CSM fibres into laminated bamboo at 45°/−45° direction still had lower bending strength than 0 and 0°/90°. In addition, the comparison of bending strength and acceptance strength criterion based on the BKI showed that all LBC configurations fulfilled the minimum bending strength of 150 MPa.

Figure 7 compares the bending MOE between the present study and previous study results [1] under different numbers of laminated bamboo layers. The current bending modulus results showed that adding a fibreglass mat layer into a bamboo composite specimen with 45°/−45° layer orientation could increase the bending MOE. A similar result was also found that bamboo composite with 7 layers had the highest bending modulus compared to 3- and 5-layer configurations. The bending modulus of bamboo composite with 3- and 5-layer configurations decreased by about 7.09 and 1.29%, respectively, compared with 7-layer configurations. Moreover, compared with the previous result [1], adding a fibreglass mat layer to the composite specimen caused an increase of about 7.46% in 3 layers, 5.52% in 5 layers, and 4.73% in 7 layers. However, the addition of CSM fibres to laminated bamboo in the 45°/−45° direction still had a lower bending modulus than 0 and 0°/90° directions. Compared to the acceptance criterion by the BKI standard [30], the bending modulus value of all LBCs was above the minimum bending modulus of 6.86 GPa, as seen in Figure 7.

4.2 Tensile test result under different numbers of bamboo layers

Tensile strength/ultimate tensile strength is the maximum stress a composite can withstand when stretched before the material fractures. The tensile strength could generally be found by performing a tensile test and the measured strain and stress value changes. The highest point of the stress–strain curve is called the ultimate tensile strength. The strength value does not depend on the size of the material but on the type of the material. Figure 8 shows the comparative tensile strength result under different layers. In the present result, at 45°/−45° layer orientation, it was analysed that the highest tensile strength was found in the laminated bamboo specimen with 7 layers at a value of 98.1 MPa. Moreover, specimens with 3 and 5 layers had a tensile strength of about 84.92 and 91.08 MPa, respectively. Those values decreased approximately by 13.20% for 3 layers and 6.92% for 5 layers compared with specimens with 7 layers. This result has the same phenomenon as mechanical testing conducted by Manik et al. [1] at the same compaction pressure of 2 MPa. The previous study showed that the LBCs with thinner bamboo lamina reinforcement and more layers had the maximum tensile strength, even though it had a lower mass fraction than bamboo. A previous study [1] also noted that the tensile strength of the LBCs did not considerably increase when the compaction pressure was increased from 2 to 2.5 MPa. Tensile strength variations are less than the test’s standard deviation. Therefore, it can be said that the tensile properties of LBCs are not significantly affected by the pressure increase from 2 to 2.5 MPa.

Figure 8

Comparison of tensile strength results under different numbers of layers.

In further investigation, Figure 8 shows that adding a fibreglass mat to an LBC improved the tensile strength. Compared to the earlier discovery of the formation of LBCs with a comparable number of layers without employing fibreglass mat [1], the tensile strength of 3-layer, 5-layer, and 7-layer specimens increased by about 17.73, 12.44, and 11.19%, respectively. It was found that the addition of fibreglass mat significantly influenced the LBC with lower and thicker bamboo lamina. The influence of fibreglass addition gradually decreased as the number of bamboo laminated layers increased. However, adding fibreglass mat into specimen with 45°/−45° layer orientation still had lower tensile strength compared to specimens with 0 and 0°/90°.

The relationship between the tensile strength of LBCs and the mass fraction of LBCs shows that the highest tensile strength was found in composites with thinner bamboo reinforcement and a higher number of layers even with a lower bamboo fibre mass fraction. Previous research [31] reported using the red semantan (Gigantochloa scortechinii) bamboo species, woven bamboo fibre (woven bamboo) with a mass fraction (wt%) of bamboo lamina of 33% and a mass fraction (wt%) of epoxy matrix of 67%, was able to produce a maximum tensile strength of 89 MPa. Rassiah et al. [17] used LBCs with different types of bamboo and matrices (Gigantochloa scortechinii and UP). They reported that the thicker the bamboo slats, the lower the tensile strength and bending strength.

In addition, tensile strength of all specimens in the previous study [1] had a lower value than the tensile strength threshold given by BKI. Figure 8 shows that with the addition of a fibreglass mat layer to LBCs in the present study, only a sample with 7 layers fulfilled the BKI tensile strength standard (98 MPa). It can be inferred that adding fibreglass mat layers into a bamboo composite with 7 layers successfully improves tensile strength and achieves the tensile strength threshold.

The tensile MOE is a number used to measure a material’s resistance to elastic deformation when a force is applied to the specimen. The elastic modulus of a specimen is defined as the slope of the stress–strain curve in the elastic deformation region. It is shown in Figure 9 that increasing the number of layers caused an increase in the modulus elasticity. Being analysed at 45°/−45° layer orientation, the highest modulus elasticity was found in a specimen with 7 layers with 940.83 MPa. The modulus elasticity of a specimen with 3 layers was 26.47% lower than that of a specimen with 7 layers. Moreover, the samples with 5 layers experienced a lower trend nearly 14.19% lesser than those with 7 layers. Furthermore, a comparison of modulus of elasticity between the current result and the previous study [1] at the same compaction pressure of 2 MPa revealed that adding a fibreglass mat increased the modulus elasticity value. The increased percentages on 3 layers, 5 layers, and 7 layers were 11.95, 4.65, and 4.77%, respectively. Moreover, compared to the BKI standard for tensile MOE, the only specimen with 5 and 7 layers at layer orientation of 45°/−45° had a tensile modulus above the given threshold. The addition of a fibreglass mat layer caused improvement in tensile modulus in specimens with 5 layers. In contrast, in the previous study, the tensile modulus had a lower value than the given BKI threshold (6.86 GPa). In general recommendation, the LBC using other layer orientations (0° and 0°/90°) with superior tensile properties is recommended to be applied as a ship structure.

Figure 9

Comparison of MOE results under different numbers of layers.

4.3 Result of impact test under different numbers of bamboo layers

In this case, the impact strength was used to measure the material’s capability to withstand a suddenly applied load and was expressed in terms of energy. Impact test is used when ship structure experiences impact load due to ship collision, ship-jetty collision, ship-bridge collision, slamming phenomenon, etc. Impact testing aimed to determine the brittle nature of the test specimen against impact load. Impact testing required energy to break the specimen with one hit using a hammer with a specific weight that is dropped by releasing it from a certain angle. The number of layers strongly influenced the impact strength value in the LBC. Figure 10 compares the impact strength of the bamboo laminate composite to the variation in the number of layers. The impact strength increased as the number of layers increased. LBCs with the highest number of layers (7 layers) were formed from bamboo fibres with a thinner thickness (1 mm). Similar findings can be found compared with previous mechanical testing (bending and tensile tests). The optimum mass fraction can be achieved by a composition of 35% epoxy resin and 65% bamboo lamina.

Figure 10

Comparison of impact test results under different numbers laminated layers.

The impact strength of the specimen with 7 layers was higher than the specimen with 3 and 5 layers, where the highest impact strength can be found in a sample with 7 layers with 0° layer orientation. Adding fibreglass mat on 45°/−45° specimen increased the impact strength value from 3 layers to 5 layers by 5.68%. Then, there was an increase in the impact strength value from 3 layers to 7 layers by 15.27%. Compared to the specimen without a fibreglass mat layer, the addition of fibreglass mat causes an increase of about 18.1% in 3 layers, 22.3% in 5 layers, and 22.8% in 7 layers, respectively. However, even after adding fibreglass layer, the impact strength was still below the impact threshold given by BKI acceptance criteria. It can be found that only specimens with 0° layer orientation could fulfil the BKI standard at 150 MPa.

An important recommendation in this study is to improve the strength properties of LBCs by using a thinner bamboo lamina with a higher number of bamboo layers. It is assumed that the ability of the epoxy resin to penetrate the thinner pores of the Apus bamboo fibre increases, thereby increasing the interfacial strength of the bamboo layer. In general, the impact strength of composite materials increased with increase in in the fibre content, but the lower impact strength values at higher fibre compositions may be due to improper adhesion between matrix and fibre [32].

4.4 Result of V-notched beam test under different numbers of bamboo layers

The V-notched beam testing method was used to determine the in-plane shear properties of the LBC under different numbers of layers. This test method applied an asymmetrical four-point compression load to a sample with V notches, which enabled the application of only shear stress on the evaluation area. This method is ideal for testing various CFRP laminate materials, including unidirectional, orthogonally laminated, and discontinuous fibre materials. Figure 11 compares the shear strength between the present study (45°/45° bamboo + CSM) under different layers and previous results reported by Yang et al. [33] with a similar method using ASTM D7078. It can be observed from the present result that the highest shear strength was found in the specimen with 7 layers at 98.91 MPa. Specimen with 3 and 5 layers showed lower shear strength, about 22.75, and a 9.48% decrease compared to 7-layer specimens. Similar to the previous explanation, the recommendation for improving the strength properties of LBCs can be achieved by using thinner bamboo laminated with a higher number of bamboo layers, as recommended by other mechanical testings.

Figure 11

V-notched beam test results under different numbers of layers.

Compared to the shear strength result reported by Yang et al. [33], the present material combination of laminated bamboo – CSM – epoxy adhesive achieved higher shear strength. Yang et al. [33] investigated a comparison of shear strength under four different bamboo material combinations. They created a basalt fibre reinforced polymer (BFRP) bamboo sandwich structure using two methods: laminated bamboo lumber (LBL) and parallel bamboo strand lumber (PBSL) [34]. Bamboo tubes were disassembled into thin flat laminae for LBL, then laminated with an adhesive to form various structural members [35]. The PBSL, on the other hand, was constructed by disassembling bamboo tubes into filament bundles and then gluing them together with an adhesive to form certifiable structural members [36]. The raw bamboo material of PBSL and LBL was the Moso bamboo from Jiangxi Province, China. Based on data in Figure 11, the BFRP-bamboo sandwich structure using PBSL had superior shear properties to BFRP-LBL. Moreover, the shear strength of the BFRP-LBL and BFRP-PBSL increased by 44 and 22% compared to LBL and PBSL specimens. Therefore, the novel BFRP-bamboo sandwich structure can effectively improve the shear capacity of bamboo lumber. The findings are similar to the present study: adding a fibreglass mat layer to laminated bamboo increased the mechanical properties.

4.5 Result of a lap shear test under different numbers of bamboo layers

Adhesive bond strength is one of the most critical measures when comparing different formulations of LBCs. In this case, a lap shear test was conducted to measure the bonding strength of the epoxy adhesive layer. Based on data in Figure 12, the bonding strength of the epoxy adhesive joint between two engineered bamboo was 18.96 MPa. In the previous investigation by Liu et al. [37], the bonding properties between engineered bamboo and steel substrates had a lower value of about 13.51 MPa. They used Commercial Selleys Araldite Super Strength bicomponent epoxy (New South Wales, Australia) as adhesive material. Shah et al. [38] compared five commercial adhesive materials for adhesion testing of laminated bamboos, such as polyurethane (Purbond, Henkel, Switzerland), polyvinyl acetate (Lumberjack wood adhesive, Everbuild, UK), soy-flour based adhesive (Soyad, Solenis, USA), resorcinol phenol formaldehyde (Polyproof, Polyvine, UK), and urea phenol formaldehyde (Cascamite, Polyvine, UK). The investigation showed that the resorcinol phenol formaldehyde adhesive type had the highest bonding strength compared to other adhesive types. Moreover, Guan et al. [39] explored another type of resin and analysed the bonding strength of laminated bamboo using phenol formaldehyde resin with a maximum bonding strength of about 14.08 MPa. Based on this investigation, it can be summarised that each adhesive/glue type for bamboo joint has different bonding strengths.

Figure 12

Lap shear test results under different types of adhesive material.

4.6 Future studies suggestion on the manufacturing strategy for fishing vessel structure

Following a series of mechanical tests to develop the basic mechanical properties of the LBC, the implementation for manufacturing a ship structure must be investigated. The compaction pressure method is used to manufacture the laminated bamboo. This method employs thin laminated bamboo that is arranged and glued together to create a bamboo board of a specific dimension and thickness. To improve the adhesive strength between the layers, a cold press machine was used to press the bamboo board. Based on the findings of this study, it is possible to conclude that laminated bamboo has greater strength.

Several bamboo boards can be combined using mechanical joints to produce a large panel in the ship structure manufacturing technique. Laminate joints are divided into solid jointed boards and connecting boards made of intact sawn wood. A non-solid jointed board is a connecting board made up of joined connecting slats or short sawn wood. There are five types of connecting blades and boards: butt joints, finger joints, scarf joints, tongue and groove joints, and desk joints. Figure 13 depicts five different types of joints. Future investigation on the joint strength of the LBC is crucial.

Figure 13

Joint types of laminated composite: (a) butt joint, (b) scarf joint, (c) finger joint, (d) tongue and groove joint, and (e) desk joint.

In the early stages of development, flat-based typical structures such as decks, walls, and superstructure members, among others are better suited for this manufacturing technique. Further, developing curved-based bamboo boards can be a more complicated process with complex manufacturing techniques. For example, flat bamboo boards can be arranged and then joined together to create a deck with specific scantling calculations. The values of tensile strength, flexure, and MOE collected from mechanical testing determine the size of the fishing vessel construction components in the scantling calculation. The size of the ship construction components such as the shell, deck, wall, stiffener, etc. is determined using the BKI standard small vessel up to 24 m [40].