Startseite Philosophie Frame-theoretische Modellierung von transkulturellen Begriffen am Beispiel von ‚Sprachpurismus‘
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Frame-theoretische Modellierung von transkulturellen Begriffen am Beispiel von ‚Sprachpurismus‘

Eine erste Skizze
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
„singen unde sagen“
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch „singen unde sagen“

Abstract

‘(Linguistic) purism’ - similar to ‘classicism’ or ‘mannerism’ - represents a cultural-historical conceptualisation that is configured as a complex transcultural discourse and takes on different, albeit related, cultural-historical shapes in the various spheres of life - language, art, moral, etc. - throughout linguistic and cultural history. Such complex, classical conceptualisations require a comprehensive, homogeneous and at the same time flexible theoretical modelling.

Frame-semantical approaches have enjoyed great success in recent decades. However, discourses that transcend linguistic, disciplinary, geographical and temporal boundaries have not yet been analysed from such a perspective. These discourses represent a special type of frame, because they are both of a general conceptual nature (i. e. at their core they apply cross-linguistically or stand for classes of frames, such as movement) and of a culture- or epoch-specific nature (i. e. they generally apply to individual languages, such as süeze), in that they take on particular features in their respective specific temporal-spatial constellations.

This article aims to outline how a classical cultural-historical conceptualisation such as ‘linguistic purism’ can be modelled within the framework of historical cognitive frame semantics and which theoretical and practical advantages this approach holds.

Abstract

‘(Linguistic) purism’ - similar to ‘classicism’ or ‘mannerism’ - represents a cultural-historical conceptualisation that is configured as a complex transcultural discourse and takes on different, albeit related, cultural-historical shapes in the various spheres of life - language, art, moral, etc. - throughout linguistic and cultural history. Such complex, classical conceptualisations require a comprehensive, homogeneous and at the same time flexible theoretical modelling.

Frame-semantical approaches have enjoyed great success in recent decades. However, discourses that transcend linguistic, disciplinary, geographical and temporal boundaries have not yet been analysed from such a perspective. These discourses represent a special type of frame, because they are both of a general conceptual nature (i. e. at their core they apply cross-linguistically or stand for classes of frames, such as movement) and of a culture- or epoch-specific nature (i. e. they generally apply to individual languages, such as süeze), in that they take on particular features in their respective specific temporal-spatial constellations.

This article aims to outline how a classical cultural-historical conceptualisation such as ‘linguistic purism’ can be modelled within the framework of historical cognitive frame semantics and which theoretical and practical advantages this approach holds.

Heruntergeladen am 5.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111406251-009/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen