Home Reply to comments from Ulf Kongsgaard to our study
Article Publicly Available

Reply to comments from Ulf Kongsgaard to our study

  • Jan Henrik Rosland EMAIL logo and Jonn Terje Geitung
Published/Copyright: September 7, 2018
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

To the editor,

We are grateful for Professor Ulf Kongsgaard’s interest in our article and his important comments to our experience with neurolytic block of the coeliac plexus for otherwise intractable pain from upper abdominal malignancies [1]. We appreciate that he emphasizes the discussion of when to use such an invasive treatment and how to choose patients who will most likely benefit.

Professor Kongsgaard proposes a large international registry study. This could be of great value, and we hope readers among the leadership of palliative care societies will take on such an important challenge. A comprehensive review, perhaps with a meta-analysis, of published data could be repeated [2]. We would surely applaud such studies, but as Ulf Kongsgaard also emphasizes, our study is a small study, similar to most other published studies on this subject, making meta-analyses of less scientific value [3].

We performed our study within a setting where we have close control of the patients’ symptoms, the performance of the procedure, and the follow-up of the patients. Our observations should therefore be a valuable contribution to this significant clinical pain problem that still is without large scientific evidence.

References

[1] Rosland JH, Geitung JT. CT guided neurolytic blockade of the coeliac plexus in patients with advanced and intractable painful pancreatic cancer. Scand J Pain 2018;18:247–51.10.1515/sjpain-2017-0185Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Mercadante S, Klepstad P, Kurita GP, Sjøgren P, Giarratano A; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Sympathetic blocks for visceral cancer pain management: a systematic review and EAPC recommendations. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2015;96:577–83.10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.07.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Zhong W, Yu Z, Zeng JX, Lin Y, Yu T, Min XH, Yuan YH, Chen QK. Celiac plexus block for treatment of pain associated with pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Pain Pract 2014;14:43–51.10.1111/papr.12083Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2018-09-07
Published in Print: 2018-10-25

©2018 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. All rights reserved.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial comment
  3. Support for mirror therapy for phantom and stump pain in landmine-injured patients
  4. Lifting with straight legs and bent spine is not bad for your back
  5. Bipolar radiofrequency neurotomy for spinal pain – a promising technique but still some steps to go
  6. Topical review
  7. Prevalence, localization, perception and management of pain in dance: an overview
  8. Clinical pain research
  9. Pain assessment in native and non-native language: difficulties in reporting the affective dimensions of pain
  10. Colored body images reveal the perceived intensity and distribution of pain in women with breast cancer treated with adjuvant taxanes: a prospective multi-method study of pain experiences
  11. Physiotherapy pain curricula in Finland: a faculty survey
  12. Mirror therapy for phantom limb and stump pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial in landmine amputees in Cambodia
  13. Pain and alcohol: a comparison of two cohorts of 60 year old women and men: findings from the Good Aging in Skåne study
  14. Prolonged, widespread, disabling musculoskeletal pain of adolescents among referrals to the Pediatric Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic from the Päijät-Häme Hospital District in southern Finland
  15. Impact of the economic crisis on pain research: a bibliometric analysis of pain research publications from Ireland, Greece, and Portugal between 1997 and 2017
  16. Measurement of skin conductance responses to evaluate procedural pain in the perioperative setting
  17. Original experimental
  18. An observational study of pain self-management strategies and outcomes: does type of pain, age, or gender, matter?
  19. Fibromyalgia patients and healthy volunteers express difficulties and variability in rating experimental pain: a qualitative study
  20. Effect of the market withdrawal of dextropropoxyphene on use of other prescribed analgesics
  21. Observational study
  22. Winning or not losing? The impact of non-pain goal focus on attentional bias to learned pain signals
  23. Gabapentin and NMDA receptor antagonists interacts synergistically to alleviate allodynia in two rat models of neuropathic pain
  24. Offset analgesia is not affected by cold pressor induced analgesia
  25. Central and peripheral pain sensitization during an ultra-marathon competition
  26. Reduced endogenous pain inhibition in adolescent girls with chronic pain
  27. Evaluation of implicit associations between back posture and safety of bending and lifting in people without pain
  28. Assessment of CPM reliability: quantification of the within-subject reliability of 10 different protocols
  29. Cerebrospinal fluid cutaneous fistula after neuraxial anesthesia: an effective treatment approach
  30. Pain in the hand caused by a previously undescribed mechanism with possible relevance for understanding regional pain
  31. The response to radiofrequency neurotomy of medial branches including a bipolar system for thoracic facet joints
  32. Letter to the Editor
  33. Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome – implications for therapy
  34. Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Ly-Pen and Andréu
  35. Letter to the Editor regarding “CT guided neurolytic blockade of the coeliac plexus in patients with advanced and intractably painful pancreatic cancer”
  36. Reply to comments from Ulf Kongsgaard to our study
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sjpain-2018-0119/html
Scroll to top button