Startseite Medizin Letter to the Editor regarding “CT guided neurolytic blockade of the coeliac plexus in patients with advanced and intractably painful pancreatic cancer”
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Letter to the Editor regarding “CT guided neurolytic blockade of the coeliac plexus in patients with advanced and intractably painful pancreatic cancer”

  • Ulf E. Kongsgaard EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 26. Juli 2018
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Dear Editor

I read with interest the article by Jan Henrik Rosland and John Terje Geitung addressing the important topic of neurolytic blockade of the coeliac plexus in unresectable pancreatic cancer [1]. I pointed out many years ago that this is still a very useful therapeutic strategy and should be a therapeutic alternative for patients with intractable cancer pain [2]. What is important, however, is that these patients must be treated in a multidisciplinary setting, offering surgical, endoscopic, oncologic and palliative treatment, as soon as pancreatic pain is diagnosed. We must remember that although pain is a challenge in many patients, icterus, nausea, weight loss, fatigue, mood changes, diabetes, pancreatitis, hormonal disturbances, gastric retention and ascites are symptoms that also need to be addressed. What is interesting is that in some cases, a successful neurolytic blockade will not only ease pain, but can also have effect on other symptoms [3].

It is important to select the most suitable treatment depending on patients’ actual medical state and the predicted outcome [4]. However, pain intensity will differ between patients, and it is difficult to identify the patients who will benefit from a blockade compared to conventional pain therapy.

There are arguments for early us of neurolytic blockades [5, 6], but although there are practice guidelines published [7], there is still a debate when to do a block, insert a neuraxial catheter, or try conventional pharmacotherapy.

There are different methods for performing the block. CT-guided neurolytic blockade is well established. As mentioned by Roseland, endoscopic ultrasound guided blockade is used in many centers. Also, it should be pointed out that this blockade is also feasible through thoracoscopy [8].

Roseland is probably right in claiming that conventional, high-quality, controlled studies are difficult in this patient population. However, larger observational, registry studies, if performed through international collaboration, should add sound knowledge. Although interesting and well written, I am not so sure that yet another small observational study including 11 patients, and with vague conclusions, will guide us in the future.

  1. Conflict of interest: None declared.

References

[1] Rosland JH, Geitung JT. CT guided neurolytic blockade of the coeliac plexus in patients with advanced and intractable painful pancreatic cancer. Scand J Pain 2018;18:247–51.10.1515/sjpain-2017-0185Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Kongsgaard UE, Bjorgo S, Hauser M. Neurolytic blocks for cancer pain – still a useful therapeutica strategy. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2004;124:481–3.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Brian MY, Myers RP. Neurolytic Celiac plexus block for pain control in unresectable pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:430–8.10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00967.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Masuda T, Kuramoto M, Shimada S, Ikeshima S, Yamamoto K, Nakamura K, Baba H. Splanchnectomy for pancreatic cancer pain. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:941726.10.1155/2014/941726Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] Wyse JM, Chen YI, Sahai AV. Celiac plexus neurolysis in the management of unresectable pancreatic cancer: when and how. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:2186–92.10.3748/wjg.v20.i9.2186Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] Yoon DM, Yoon KB, Baek IC, Ko SH, Kim SH. Predictors of analgesic efficacy of neurolytic celiac plexus block in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Support Care Cancer 2018;26:2023–30.10.1007/s00520-018-4043-2Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Wyse JM, Battat R, Sun S, Saftoiu A, Siddiqui AA, Leong AT, Arturo Arias BL, Fabbri C, Adler DG, Santo E, Kalaitzakis E, Artifon E, Mishra G, Okasha HH, Poley JW, Guo J, Vila JJ, Lee LS, Sharma M, Bhutani MS, et al. Practice guidelines for endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis. Endosc Ultrasound 2017;6:369–75.10.4103/eus.eus_97_17Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] Bhutiani N, Cheadle GA, Bahr MH, Vitale GC. Comparative efficacy of bilateral thoracoscopy splanchnicectomy for intractable pain secondary to pancreatic cancer vs chronic pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg 2017;224:566–71.10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.048Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2018-07-09
Accepted: 2018-07-09
Published Online: 2018-07-26
Published in Print: 2018-10-25

©2018 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. All rights reserved.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial comment
  3. Support for mirror therapy for phantom and stump pain in landmine-injured patients
  4. Lifting with straight legs and bent spine is not bad for your back
  5. Bipolar radiofrequency neurotomy for spinal pain – a promising technique but still some steps to go
  6. Topical review
  7. Prevalence, localization, perception and management of pain in dance: an overview
  8. Clinical pain research
  9. Pain assessment in native and non-native language: difficulties in reporting the affective dimensions of pain
  10. Colored body images reveal the perceived intensity and distribution of pain in women with breast cancer treated with adjuvant taxanes: a prospective multi-method study of pain experiences
  11. Physiotherapy pain curricula in Finland: a faculty survey
  12. Mirror therapy for phantom limb and stump pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial in landmine amputees in Cambodia
  13. Pain and alcohol: a comparison of two cohorts of 60 year old women and men: findings from the Good Aging in Skåne study
  14. Prolonged, widespread, disabling musculoskeletal pain of adolescents among referrals to the Pediatric Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic from the Päijät-Häme Hospital District in southern Finland
  15. Impact of the economic crisis on pain research: a bibliometric analysis of pain research publications from Ireland, Greece, and Portugal between 1997 and 2017
  16. Measurement of skin conductance responses to evaluate procedural pain in the perioperative setting
  17. Original experimental
  18. An observational study of pain self-management strategies and outcomes: does type of pain, age, or gender, matter?
  19. Fibromyalgia patients and healthy volunteers express difficulties and variability in rating experimental pain: a qualitative study
  20. Effect of the market withdrawal of dextropropoxyphene on use of other prescribed analgesics
  21. Observational study
  22. Winning or not losing? The impact of non-pain goal focus on attentional bias to learned pain signals
  23. Gabapentin and NMDA receptor antagonists interacts synergistically to alleviate allodynia in two rat models of neuropathic pain
  24. Offset analgesia is not affected by cold pressor induced analgesia
  25. Central and peripheral pain sensitization during an ultra-marathon competition
  26. Reduced endogenous pain inhibition in adolescent girls with chronic pain
  27. Evaluation of implicit associations between back posture and safety of bending and lifting in people without pain
  28. Assessment of CPM reliability: quantification of the within-subject reliability of 10 different protocols
  29. Cerebrospinal fluid cutaneous fistula after neuraxial anesthesia: an effective treatment approach
  30. Pain in the hand caused by a previously undescribed mechanism with possible relevance for understanding regional pain
  31. The response to radiofrequency neurotomy of medial branches including a bipolar system for thoracic facet joints
  32. Letter to the Editor
  33. Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome – implications for therapy
  34. Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Ly-Pen and Andréu
  35. Letter to the Editor regarding “CT guided neurolytic blockade of the coeliac plexus in patients with advanced and intractably painful pancreatic cancer”
  36. Reply to comments from Ulf Kongsgaard to our study
Heruntergeladen am 29.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sjpain-2018-0110/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen