Home Mathematics Small perturbations of critical nonlocal equations with variable exponents
Article Open Access

Small perturbations of critical nonlocal equations with variable exponents

  • Lulu Tao , Rui He and Sihua Liang EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 31, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this article, we are concerned with the following critical nonlocal equation with variable exponents:

( Δ ) p ( x , y ) s u = λ f ( x , u ) + u q ( x ) 2 u in Ω , u = 0 in R N \ Ω ,

where Ω R N is a bounded domain with Lipschitz boundary, N 2 , p C ( Ω × Ω ) is symmetric, f : C ( Ω × R ) R is a continuous function, and λ is a real positive parameter. We also assume that { x R N : q ( x ) = p s ( x ) } , and p s ( x ) = N p ˜ ( x ) ( N s p ˜ ( x ) ) is the critical Sobolev exponent for variable exponents. We prove the existence of non-trivial solutions in the case of low perturbations ( λ small enough) by using the mountain pass theorem, the concentration-compactness principles for fractional Sobolev spaces with variable exponents, and the Moser iteration method. The features of this article are the following: (1) the function f does not satisfy the usual Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition and (2) this article contains the presence of critical terms, which can be viewed as a partial extension of the previous results concerning the the existence of solutions to this problem in the case of s = 1 and subcritical case.

MSC 2010: 35B33; 35D30; 35J20; 46E35; 49J35

1 Introduction

In this article, we deal with the existence of solution to the following critical nonlocal equations with variable exponents:

(1.1) ( Δ ) p ( x , y ) s u = λ f ( x , u ) + u q ( x ) 2 u in Ω , u = 0 in R N \ Ω ,

where Ω R N is a bounded domain with Lipschitz boundary, N 2 , p C ( Ω × Ω ) is symmetric, almost everywhere, p ( x , y ) = p ( y , x ) for all ( x , y ) R N × R N , q C ( Ω ) satisfies

p ˜ ( x ) p ( x , x ) < q ( x ) p s ( x ) N p ˜ ( x ) N s p ˜ ( x )

for all x R N and λ is a real parameter. The functional f ( x , t ) C ( Ω × R ) satisfies the following growth assumptions:

  1. lim t 0 f ( x , t ) t p ( x ) 2 t = 0 uniformly in x ;

  2. lim t f ( x , t ) t p 2 t = + uniformly in x .

Our interest in Problem (1.1) is mainly based on theoretical and practical reasons. On the one hand, many scholars pay attention to the study of differential equations and variational issues involving p ( x ) -growth conditions in recent years. The development of numerous significant models in electrorheological and thermorheological fluids, image processing, and other fields inspired a systematic study of partial differential equations with variable exponents (see [14]). As we all know, Lebesgue spaces with variable exponents were initially studied in this article [5] by Orlicz. Then, we can obtain more details on Lebesgue Sobolev spaces related to the p ( ) -Laplacian with variable exponents in [6,7]. The Lebesgue-Sobolev spaces related to the p ( ) -Laplacian are called variable-exponent Lebesgue-Sobolev spaces and were studied in [8,9]. We also refer the reader to the book [10] for basic knowledge in this area. The literature on the study of such operators is large but we only list a few of them and the recently published articles for interested readers (see e.g., [1118]). In these articles, the authors used different methods to establish the existence of solutions and some other properties under the subcritical growth condition. Very recently, Cao et al. in [19] established the existence of nontrivial solutions for p ( x ) -Laplacian equations

(1.2) div ( u p ( x ) 2 u ) = u q ( x ) 2 u + λ f ( x , u ) in Ω , u = 0 on Ω ,

where Ω R N is a bounded domain with Lipschitz boundary, p C ( Ω ¯ ) with 1 < p ( x ) < N , q C ( Ω ¯ ) with p + max x Ω ¯ p ( x ) < q = min x Ω ¯ q ( x ) q + max x Ω ¯ q ( x ) < p ( x ) , p ( x ) = N p ( x ) N p ( x ) is the critical exponent and f : Ω × R R is a continuous function without any growth and Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz conditions. However, the study of critical problem is a very meaningful subject, and the critical problem was initially studied in the seminal paper of Brézis and Nirenberg in [20], which treated for Laplace equations. Since then, there have been extensions of [20] in many directions. Elliptic equations involving critical growth are delicate due to the lack of compactness arising in connection with the variational approach. For such problems, the concentration-compactness principles introduced by Lions in [21,22] and its variants at infinity in [23,24] have played a decisive role in showing that a minimizing sequence or a Palais-Smale sequence is precompact. By using these concentration-compactness principles or extending them to the Sobolev spaces with variable exponents, many authors have been successful to deal with critical problems involving p ( ) -Laplacian (see e.g., [2429] and references therein).

On the other hand, nonlocal operators can be seen as the infinitesimal generators of Lévy stable diffusion processes in [30]. Moreover, they allow us to develop a generalization of quantum mechanics and also to describe the motion of a chain or an array of particles that are connected by elastic springs as well as unusual diffusion processes in turbulent fluid motions and material transports in fractured media (for more details, see, for example, [31,32] and references therein). The study of elliptic equations with nonlocal operators is one of the most fascinating areas of nonlinear analysis. These issues have received a lot of attention in both pure mathematics study and practical applications (see, for example, the recent monograph [33]). The study of fractional Sobolev space with variable exponents is natural extension of variable-exponent Lebesgue Sobolev spaces. As far as we know, the fractional Sobolev spaces with variable exponent and the fractional p ( x ) -Laplacian were introduced first by Kaufmann et al. in [34]. Here, the authors obtained the embedding result of these spaces to variable-exponent Lebesgue spaces. In addition, they also discussed the existence result of a fractional p ( x ) -Laplacian problem. Very recently, Ho and Kim obtained fundamental embedding results for the new fractional Sobolev spaces with variable exponents that are a generalization of the well-known fractional Sobolev spaces in [35]. Using this, they demonstrated a priori bounds and multiplicity of solutions of some nonlinear elliptic problems involving the fractional p ( ) -Laplacian. We refer to [3638] for fractional Sobolev spaces with variable exponents and the corresponding nonlocal equations with variable exponents.

Inspired by the works in the aforementioned references, our main purpose in this article is to study the existence of solution for Problem (1.1). Moreover, we do not assume that f satisfy the well-known Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz-type condition, and q ( x ) can reach the critical exponent p s ( x ) . Therefore, it can be viewed as a partial extension of the results of Cao et al. in [19] concerning the existence of solutions to equation (1.2) in the case of s = 1 and subcritical case.

We are ready to state the main result of this article.

Theorem 1.1

Assume that the assumptions ( f 1 ) and ( f 2 ) hold. Then, there exists λ 1 > 0 such that Problem (1.1) admits at least one nontrivial solution for λ ( 0 , λ 1 ) .

The main difficulty in treating Problem (1.1) is the possible lack of compactness due to the presence of critical term and the growth condition of function f . To overcome the difficulties that arise from these features, we use the cutoff function approach and the concentration-compactness principles for fractional Sobolev spaces with variable exponents to prove that auxiliary problem has at least one nontrivial solution. Finally, we obtain nontrivial solutions for original problems with the aid of the Moser iteration method.

The rest of this article is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present some necessary preliminary knowledge on variable-exponent Lebesgue space and fractional Sobolev space with variable-exponent space. In Section 3, we prove the Palais-Smale condition at some special energy levels by using the concentration-compactness principles for fractional Sobolev spaces with variable exponents. In Section 4, we prove the uniform bound of weak solution to auxiliary problem. Section 5 is devoted to proving the existence of nontrivial solutions of Problem (1.1) by the Moser iteration method.

2 Preliminaries

In this section, we briefly review the definitions and list some basic properties of the Lebesgue spaces. Furthermore, we recall and establish some qualitative properties of the new fractional Sobolev spaces with variable exponents.

2.1 Some basic function spaces

We first recall some properties involving Lebesgue-Sobolev spaces with variable exponents in [10,39]. Set Ω be a bounded domain of R N , and

C + ( Ω ¯ ) = { h C ( Ω ¯ ) : h ( x ) > 1 for all x Ω ¯ } .

For any h C + ( Ω ¯ ) , we define

h = min x Ω ¯ h ( x ) , h + = max x Ω ¯ h ( x ) .

For any p C + ( Ω ¯ ) , we define the variable-exponent Lebesgue space as follows:

L p ( x ) ( Ω ) = u : Ω R u is measurable and Ω u ( x ) p ( x ) d x < + ,

which endowed with the norm:

u L p ( x ) ( Ω ) = u p ( x ) = inf λ > 0 : Ω u ( x ) λ p ( x ) d x 1 .

Proposition 2.1

[40]

  1. Denote by L p ( x ) ( Ω ) the conjugate space of L p ( x ) ( Ω ) with 1 p ( x ) + 1 p ( x ) = 1 ,

    Ω u v d x 1 p + 1 ( p ) u p ( x ) v p ( x ) , u L p ( x ) ( Ω ) , v L p ( x ) ( Ω )

    holds.

  2. Define mapping ρ : L p ( x ) ( Ω ) R by ρ ( u ) = Ω u p ( x ) d x , then the following relations hold:

    u p ( x ) < 1 ( = 1 , > 1 ) ρ ( u ) < 1 ( = 1 , > 1 ) , u p ( x ) > 1 u p ( x ) p ρ ( u ) u p ( x ) p + , u p ( x ) < 1 u p ( x ) p + ρ ( u ) u p ( x ) p .

Proposition 2.2

[41] Assume that h L + ( Ω ) , p C + ( Ω ¯ ) . If u h ( x ) L p ( x ) ( Ω ) , then we have

min { u h ( x ) p ( x ) h , u h ( x ) p ( x ) h + } u h ( x ) p ( x ) max { u h ( x ) p ( x ) h , u h ( x ) p ( x ) h + } .

Let s ( 0 , 1 ) and p ( 1 , ) be constants. Define the fractional Sobolev space W s , p ( Ω ) as follows:

W s , p ( Ω ) u L p ( Ω ) : Ω Ω u ( x ) u ( y ) p x y N + s p d x d y < ,

which endowed with norm:

u s , p , Ω Ω u ( x ) p d x + Ω Ω u ( x ) u ( y ) p x y N + s p d x d y 1 p .

2.2 Fractional Sobolev space with variable exponent

Meanwhile, we recall and find some qualitative properties of the new fractional Sobolev spaces with variable exponents in [34,35]. Let Ω be a bounded Lipschitz domain in R N . In the following, for brevity, we use p ( x ) instead of p ( x , x ) . With this notation, p C + ( Ω ¯ ) . Define

W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) u L p ( ) ( Ω ) : Ω × Ω u ( x ) u ( y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y < + ,

which endowed with the norm:

u s , p , Ω inf λ > 0 : M Ω u λ < 1 ,

where

M Ω ( u ) = Ω × Ω u ( x ) u ( y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + sp ( x , y ) d x d y .

Then, W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) is a separable reflexive Banach space.

On W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) , we also make use of the following norm:

u s , p , Ω u L p ( ) ( Ω ) + [ u ] s , p , Ω ,

where

[ u ] s , p , Ω inf λ > 0 : Ω × Ω u ( x ) u ( y ) p ( x , y ) λ p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y < 1 .

Note that s , p 1 Ω and s , p , Ω are equivalent norms on W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) with the relation

1 2 u s , p , Ω u s , p , Ω 2 u s , p , Ω , u W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) .

In the follows, when Ω is understood, we use s , p , s , p , and [ ] s , p instead of s , p , Ω , s , p , Ω , and [ ] s , p , Ω , respectively.

Proposition 2.3

[42] On W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) , it holds that

  1. for u W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) \ { 0 } , λ = u s , p if and only if M Ω u λ = 1 ;

  2. M Ω ( u ) > 1 ( = 1 ; < 1 ) if and only if u s , p > 1 ( = 1 ; < 1 ) , respectively;

  3. if u s , p 1 , then u s , p p M Ω ( u ) u s , p p + ;

  4. if u s , p < 1 , then u s , p p + M Ω ( u ) u s , p p .

Proposition 2.4

For any uniformly continuous function r C + ( Ω ¯ ) satisfying p ( x ) r ( x ) p s ( x ) and the embedding

W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) L r ( x ) ( Ω )

holds. In particular,

(2.1) S q inf u W s , p ( ) ( Ω ) \ { 0 } u u L q ( ) ( Ω ) .

3 An auxiliary problem

In this section, we mainly prove that the energy functional associated with Problem (1.1) satisfies the ( P S ) c at some special energy levels. Due to assumption ( f 2 ) , we need to truncate the function f ; thus, there is a constant Q > 0 that is large sufficiently so that f ( x , Q ) > 0 . For all x Ω , let

(3.1) f Q ( x , t ) = f ( x , t ) if 0 < t Q , f ( x , Q ) Q q ( x ) 1 t q ( x ) 1 if t > Q , 0 if t 0 ,

where p + < q q ( x ) q + . Then, because of the continuity of f , we claim that the cutoff function f Q : Ω × R R is continuous. Moreover, by assumption ( f 1 ) and (3.1), we know that

  1. lim t 0 f Q ( x , t ) t p ( x ) 1 = 0 uniformly in x ;

  2. lim t F Q ( x , t ) t p + = + uniformly in x , where F Q ( x , t ) = 0 t f Q ( x , s ) d s ;

  3. f Q ( x , t ) C Q 1 t p ( x ) 1 + C Q 2 t q ( x ) 1 for all ( x , t ) Ω × R , where

    C Q 1 = max x Ω ¯ , t [ 0 , Q ] f ( x , t ) t p ( x ) 1 and C Q 2 = 1 Q q 1 max x Ω ¯ f ( x , Q ) ;

  4. for any θ ( p + , q ) , there exists τ = τ ( Q ) > 0 such that

    1 θ t f Q ( x , t ) F Q ( x , t ) τ t p ( x ) for all ( x , t ) Ω × [ 0 , + ) .

Thus, we consider the following revised version of Problem (1.1):

(3.2) ( Δ ) p ( x , y ) s u = λ f Q ( x , u ) + u q ( x ) 2 u in Ω , u = 0 in R N \ Ω .

The aim of this section is to prove the existence of nontrivial weak solution for Problem (3.2), that is, u W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) is a solution of Problem (3.2) if

(3.3) ( u ) , v = λ Ω f Q ( x , u ) v d x + Ω u q ( x ) 2 u v d x ,

where

(3.4) ( u ) , v R 2 N u ( x ) u ( y ) p ( x , y ) 2 ( u ( x ) u ( y ) ) ( v ( x ) v ( y ) ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y

for all v W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) . Problem (3.2) has a variational nature, and the energy functional J λ Q : W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) R associated with it is defined as follows:

(3.5) J λ Q ( u ) = T p ( , ) ( u ) λ Ω F Q ( x , u ) d x Ω 1 q ( x ) u q ( x ) d x ,

where

T p ( , ) ( u ) R 2 N u ( x ) u ( y ) p ( x , y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y

and F Q ( x , t ) = 0 t f Q ( x , s ) d s . It is easy to check that J λ Q C 1 ( W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) , R ) . Therefore, all solutions of Problem (3.2) correspond to critical points of the functional J λ Q in the weak sense.

Now, we prove that functional J λ Q has the mountain pass geometry.

Lemma 3.1

Let λ > 0 and Q > 0 . Then, the energy functional J λ Q satisfies

  1. there exist ρ 0 > 0 and σ 0 > 0 such that J λ Q ( u ) σ 0 for any u W s , p ( , ) with u = ρ 0 ;

  2. there exists φ 0 W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) , φ 0 > 0 such that J λ Q ( t φ 0 ) as t + .

Proof

First, from ( e 1 ) and ( e 3 ) , we know that for any ε > 0 , there is a C ε > 0 such that

(3.6) f Q ( x , t ) ε t p ( x ) 1 + C ε t q ( x ) 1

and

(3.7) F Q ( x , t ) ε t p ( x ) + C ε t q ( x ) .

Hence, for u W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) with u < 1 , by Propositions 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3, we have

(3.8) J λ Q ( u ) = T p ( , ) ( u ) Ω 1 q ( x ) u q ( x ) d x λ Ω F Q ( x , u ) d x 1 p + R 2 N u ( x ) u ( y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y Ω 1 q ( x ) u q ( x ) d x λ ε Ω u p ( x ) d x λ C ε Ω u q ( x ) d x 1 p + λ S q ε R 2 N u ( x ) u ( y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y 1 q + λ C ε u q 1 p + λ S q ε u p 1 q + λ C ε S q u q .

Let ε = 1 2 λ S q p + , from (3.8), one has

(3.9) J λ Q ( u ) 1 2 p + u p + 1 q + λ C ε S q u q ,

when u < 1 . Then, we can find ρ 0 > 0 and σ 0 > 0 such that J λ Q ( u ) σ 0 for u = ρ 0 since q > p + . Hence, ( D 1 ) in Lemma 3.1 holds true.

Now, we verify condition ( D 2 ) of Lemma 3.1. From condition ( e 2 ) , we know that for any k > 0 , there exists a constant δ k > 1 large enough such that

F Q ( x , t ) k t p + for all t > δ k and x Ω .

It follows from ( e 3 ) that

F Q ( x , t ) C Q 1 p + δ k p + + C Q 2 q δ k q + for all 0 t δ k and x Ω .

So, we obtain that there exists a constant C k > 0 such that

(3.10) F Q ( x , t ) k t p + C k for all t > 0 and x Ω .

Fix φ 0 W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) with φ 0 > 0 on Ω and t > 1 . From (3.10), we have

(3.11) J λ Q ( t φ 0 ) = T p ( , ) ( t φ 0 ) Ω 1 q ( x ) t φ 0 q ( x ) d x λ Ω F Q ( x , t φ 0 ) d x T p ( , ) ( t φ 0 ) λ t p + k Ω φ 0 p + d x + λ C k Ω t p + T p ( , ) ( φ 0 ) λ k Ω φ 0 p + d x + λ C k Ω .

Let k large enough such that

T p ( , ) ( φ 0 ) λ k Ω φ 0 p + d x + λ C k Ω < 0 ,

then

lim t + J λ Q ( t φ 0 ) = .

we can also obtain the conclusion ( D 2 ) in Lemma 3.1. This completes the proof of Lemma 3.1.□

It follows from Lemma 3.1 that there exists a ( P S ) c λ Q sequence { u n } W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) such that

(3.12) J λ Q ( u n ) c λ Q and J λ Q ( u n ) 0

at the minimax level

c λ Q = inf γ Γ sup t [ 0 , 1 ] J λ Q ( γ ( t ) ) > 0 ,

where Γ = { γ C 1 ( [ 0 , 1 ] , W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) ) : γ ( 0 ) = 0 , J λ Q ( γ ( 1 ) ) < 0 } .

Furthermore, we can obtain the following compactness result.

Lemma 3.2

Assume that the assumptions ( f 1 ) and ( f 2 ) hold. Then, there exists λ 0 > 0 such that J λ Q satisfies ( P S ) c λ Q -condition for any λ λ 0 , where

(3.13) c λ Q < 1 θ 1 q min { ( S q p ¯ ) ξ + , ( S q p ¯ ) ξ }

and ξ ( x ) = q ( x ) q ( x ) p ¯ and S q is defined as in (2.1).

Proof

Let { u n } W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) be a Palais-Smale sequence and J λ Q ( u n ) c λ Q for some c λ Q > 0 and all n 1 and ( J λ Q ) ( u n ) 0 .

First, we claim that { u n } is bounded in W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) .

In fact, it is easy to obtain that we have done if u n 1 . If u n 1 , then from ( e 4 ) , Propositions 2.2 and 2.3, we have

(3.14) c λ Q + o n ( 1 ) u n J λ Q ( u n ) 1 θ ( J λ Q ) ( u n ) , u n 1 p + 1 θ R 2 N u n ( x ) u n ( y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y + λ Ω 1 θ f Q ( x , u n ) u n F Q ( x , u n ) d x + 1 θ 1 q Ω u n q ( x ) d x 1 p + 1 θ u n p λ τ Ω u n p ( x ) d x 1 p + 1 θ λ τ S q u n p ,

where o n ( 1 ) denotes a quantity that goes to zero as n + . Now, choose λ 0 > 0 so that

1 p + 1 θ λ 0 τ S > 0 .

According to (3.14), we obtain

(3.15) c λ Q + o n ( 1 ) u n J λ Q ( u n ) 1 θ ( J λ Q ) ( u n ) , u n 1 p + 1 θ λ 0 τ S q u n p , λ λ 0 .

This fact implies that { u n } n is bounded in W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) .

Next, it follows from the boundedness of sequences { u n } that u n u a.e. in R 3 and

u n u in W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) ,

R N u n ( x ) u n ( y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( s , y ) d y μ in ( Ω ) ,

u n q ( x ) ν in ( Ω ) ,

where μ and ν are the bounded nonnegative measures on Ω . Then, as proof in Ho and Kim [35], up to a subsequence, there exists a (at most countable) set of distinct points { x i } i I Ω and a family of positive numbers { ν i } i I such that

U n ( x ) μ U ( x ) + i I δ x i μ i in the sense of measures in ( Ω ) , u n q ( x ) ν = u q ( x ) + i I δ x i ν i in the sense of measures in ( Ω )

and

(3.16) S q ν i 1 p ¯ s μ i 1 p ¯ for all i I ,

where

U n ( x ) Ω u n ( x ) u n ( y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d y and U ( x ) Ω u ( x ) u ( y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d y for x Ω .

In the following, we shall prove that I = .

On the contrary, we suppose that I . Let i I and we can use a smooth cut-off function ψ ε , i centered at z i such that

0 ψ ε , i ( x ) 1 , ψ ε , i ( x ) = 1 in B ε 2 ( z i ) , ψ ε , i ( x ) = 0 in B ε ( z i ) c , ψ ε , i ( x ) 4 ε ,

for any ε > 0 small. It is easy to see that { u n ψ ε , i } is a bounded sequence in W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) . Obviously, ( J λ Q ) ( u n ) , u n ψ ε , i 0 , i.e.,

( u n ) , u n ψ ε , i = λ Ω f Q ( x , u n ) u n ψ ε , i d x + Ω u n q ( x ) u n ψ ε , i d x + o n ( 1 ) ,

where

( u n ) , u n ψ ε , i R 2 N u n ( x ) u n ( y ) p ( x , y ) 2 ( u n ( x ) u n ( y ) ) ( u n ( x ) ψ ε , i ( x ) u n ( y ) ψ ε , i ( y ) ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y .

Note that

( u n ) , u n ψ ε , i = R N U n ( x ) ψ ε , i d x R 2 N u n ( x ) u n ( y ) p ( x , y ) 2 ( u n ( x ) u n ( y ) ) u n ( y ) ( ψ ε , i ( y ) ψ ε , i ( x ) ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y .

Hence,

(3.17) R N U n ( x ) ψ ε , i d x R 2 N u n ( x ) u n ( y ) p ( x , y ) 2 ( u n ( x ) u n ( y ) ) u n ( y ) ( ψ ε , i ( y ) ψ ε , i ( x ) ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y = λ Ω f Q ( x , u n ) u n ψ ε , i d x + Ω u n q ( x ) u n ψ ε , i d x + o n ( 1 ) .

Since { u n } is bounded in W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) . By the Hölider inequality and the Lebesgue dominant convergence, we have

(3.18) limsup ε 0 limsup n Ω f Q ( x , u n ) u n ψ ε , i d x = 0 .

Moreover, let δ > 0 be arbitrary and fixed. And { u n } is bounded in L q ( ) ( Ω ) . According to the Young inequality, we yield

(3.19) R 2 N u n ( x ) u n ( y ) p ( x , y ) 2 ( u n ( x ) u n ( y ) ) u n ( y ) ( ψ ε , i ( y ) ψ ε , i ( x ) ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y δ R 2 N u n ( x ) u n ( y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y C R 2 N u n ( y ) p ( x , y ) ψ ε , i ( x ) ψ ε , i ( y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y C δ C R 2 N u n ( y ) p ( x , y ) ψ ε , i ( x ) ψ ε , i ( y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x .

In view of Lemma 4.4 in [6], we obtain

lim ε 0 lim n R 2 N u n ( y ) p ( x , y ) ψ ε , i ( x ) ψ ε , i ( y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y = 0 .

Consequently, taking the limit superior in (3.17) as n and then the limit superior as ε 0 ,

(3.20) limsup ε 0 limsup n R 2 N u n ( x ) u n ( y ) p ( x , y ) 2 ( u n ( x ) u n ( y ) ) u n ( y ) ( ψ ε , i ( y ) ψ ε , i ( x ) ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y = 0 ,

since δ > 0 is arbitrary. So, ψ ε , i has compact support. Then, letting n and ε 0 in (3.20), we imply from (3.18) and (3.20) that

μ i ν i .

Inserting this into (3.16), we yield

(3.21) ν i ( S q p ¯ ) q ( z i ) q ( z i ) p ¯ min { ( S q p ¯ ) ξ + , ( S q p ¯ ) ξ } ,

where ξ = q ( z i ) q ( z i ) p ¯ . By (3.14) and (3.21), we have

c λ Q = lim n J λ Q ( u n ) = lim n J λ Q ( u n ) 1 θ ( J λ Q ) ( u n ) , u n 1 θ 1 q Ω u n q ( x ) d x 1 θ 1 q Ω u n q ( x ) ψ ε , i d x 1 θ 1 q ν i 1 θ 1 q min { ( S q p ¯ ) ξ + , ( S q p ¯ ) ξ }

for all λ ( 0 , λ 0 ) . In view of (3.13), it is a contradiction. Hence, I = . Moreover,

limsup n Ω u n q ( x ) d x = Ω u q ( x ) d x .

The Brézis-Lieb Lemma 3.9 of [43] for the variable-exponent Lebesgue spaces yields that

Ω u n u q ( x ) d x 0 .

Consequently, we have

(3.22) Ω u n q ( x ) 2 u n ( u n u ) d x 0 .

By ( e 3 ) , we have

(3.23) Ω f Q ( x , u n ) ( u n u ) d x Ω f Q ( x , u n ) ( u n u ) d x C Q 1 u n p ( x ) 1 p ( x ) p ( x ) 1 u n u p ( x ) + C Q 2 u n q ( x ) 1 q ( x ) q ( x ) 1 u n u q ( x ) C Q 1 max { u n p ( x ) p 1 , u n p ( x ) p + 1 } u n u p ( x ) + C Q 2 max { u n q ( x ) q 1 , u n q ( x ) q + 1 } u n u q ( x ) 0 as n + .

From (3.22) and (3.23), we know that lim n ( u ) , u n u = 0 . Clearly, ( J λ Q ) ( u n ) , u n u 0 as n . Hence,

o ( 1 ) = ( J λ Q ) ( u n ) ( J λ Q ) ( u ) , u n u = ( u n ) , u n u ( u ) , u n u + ( u ) , u n u λ R N ( f ( x , u n ) u n f ( x , u ) u ) ( u n u ) d x R N ( u n q ( x ) 2 u n u q ( x ) 2 u ) ( u n u ) d x = [ ( u n ) , u n u ( u ) , u n u ] + o ( 1 ) .

This implies that

lim n [ ( u n ) , u n u ( u ) , u n u ] = 0 .

Consequently, we obtain

lim n R 2 N u n ( x ) u ( y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y = lim n ( L ( u n ) , u n u L ( u ) , u n u ) = 0 .

This fact implies that { u n } strongly converges to u in W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) . Hence, the proof is complete.□

4 L estimate

In this section, we will prove the uniform bound of weak solution to Problem (1.1) by using the Moser iteration method. To this end, we need some auxiliary lemmas.

Lemma 4.1

Let β ( x ) > 0 and p ( x ) 1 . Then, we obtain

(4.1) 1 β ( x ) 1 p ( x ) p ( x ) + β ( x ) 1 p ( x ) 1 .

Proof

If p ( x ) = 1 , we can obtain the result easily. Hence, we can assume p ( x ) > 1 . So, it is obvious that the function t t p ( x ) is convex. Therefore,

β ( x ) 1 p ( x ) ( β ( x ) 1 p ( x ) 1 ) .

Moreover,

p ( x ) + β ( x ) 1 p ( x ) β ( x ) 1 p ( x ) .

So we can deduce

1 β ( x ) 1 p ( x ) p ( x ) + β ( x ) 1 p ( x ) 1 .

Hence, the proof is complete.□

Next, we define the monotone increasing function J p ( x ) ( t ) = t p ( x ) 2 t for every 1 < p ( x ) < to obtain some important conclusions.

Lemma 4.2

Let the function f : R R is C 1 and convex. Then, we obtain

(4.2) J p ( x ) ( a b ) [ A J p ( x ) , τ ( f ( a ) ) B J p ( x ) , τ ( f ( b ) ) ] ( τ ( a b ) 2 + ( f ( a ) f ( b ) ) 2 ) ( p ( x ) 2 ) 2 × ( f ( a ) f ( b ) ) ( A B )

for all τ 0 , a , b R and for any A , B 0 , where J p ( x ) , τ ( t ) = ( τ + t 2 ) ( p 2 ) 2 t , t R .

Proof

If a = b , we obtain the inequality. Then, we assume a b . And we can deduce that f is a C 1 convex function. Then, one can obtain

f ( a ) f ( b ) f ( a ) ( a b ) and f ( a ) f ( b ) f ( b ) ( a b ) .

According to (4.2), we can deduce that

(4.3) J p ( x ) ( a b ) [ A J p ( x ) , τ ( f ( a ) ) B J p ( x ) , τ ( f ( b ) ) ] = ( τ ( a b ) 2 + ( f ( a ) ( a b ) ) 2 ) ( p ( x ) 2 ) 2 f ( a ) ( a b ) A ( τ ( a b ) 2 + ( f ( b ) ( a b ) ) 2 ) ( p ( x ) 2 ) 2 f ( b ) ( a b ) B .

Therefore, we deduce inequality (4.2).□

Remark 4.1

When τ = 0 , for all a , b R and A , B 0 , we can rewrite (4.2) as the following expression:

(4.4) J p ( x ) ( a b ) [ A J p ( x ) ( f ( a ) ) B J p ( x ) ( f ( b ) ) ] ( f ( a ) f ( b ) ) p ( x ) 2 ( f ( a ) f ( b ) ) ( A B ) .

Lemma 4.3

Suppose 1 < p ( x ) < . Define

G ( t ) = 0 t g ( τ ) 1 p ( x ) d τ , t R ,

where g : R R to be an increasing function. Then, one can deduce that

J p ( x ) ( a b ) ( g ( a ) g ( b ) ) G ( a ) G ( b ) p ( x ) .

Proof

Suppose a > b (the result is the same as a < b ). In view of the Jensen inequality, we obtain

(4.5) J p ( x ) ( a b ) ( g ( a ) g ( b ) ) = ( a b ) p ( x ) 1 b a g ( τ ) d τ = ( a b ) p ( x ) 1 b a G ( τ ) p ( x ) d τ b a G ( τ ) d τ p ( x ) = G ( a ) G ( b ) p ( x ) .

Thus, the proof is completed.□

Lemma 4.4

Suppose that ( f 1 ) and ( f 2 ) are fulfilled. Let u be a solution to Problem (3.2), then u L ( Ω ) . Moreover, there exists T > 0 such that u L T .

Proof

First, for all ε > 0 , we define the function g ε ( t ) = ( ε 2 + t 2 ) 1 2 . And it is easy to prove that the function g ε is convex and Lipschitz. Then, we set v = ϕ g ε ( u ) p ( x , y ) 2 g ε ( u ) as the test function in (3.3) for all 0 < ϕ C c ( Ω ) . Moreover, let us set a = u ( x ) , b = u ( y ) , A = ϕ ( x ) , and B = ϕ ( y ) in (4.4). Thus, for all 0 < ϕ C c ( Ω ) , we obtain

(4.6) Ω × Ω g ε ( u ( x ) ) g ε ( u ( y ) ) p ( x , y ) 2 ( g ε ( u ( x ) ) g ε ( u ( y ) ) ) ( ϕ ( x ) ϕ ( y ) ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y Ω ( λ f Q ( x , u ) + u q ( x ) 1 ) g ε ( u ) p ( x ) 1 ϕ d x .

In view of g ε ( t ) t as t 0 and g ε ( t ) 1 , combining with Fatou’s lemma, and according to the limit ε 0 in (4.6), we deduce that

(4.7) Ω × Ω u ( x ) u ( y ) p ( x , y ) 2 ( u ( x ) u ( y ) ) ( ϕ ( x ) ψ ( y ) ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y Ω ( λ f Q ( x , u ) + u q ( x ) 1 ) ϕ d x

for all ϕ C c ( Ω ) .

Next, for all k > 0 , let us define that u k = min { ( u 1 ) + , k } W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) . Therefore, for all β > 0 and δ > 0 , we make ϕ = ( u k + δ ) β δ β to be the test function in (4.7). Then, we obtain

(4.8) Ω × Ω u ( x ) u ( y ) p ( x , y ) 2 ( u ( x ) u ( y ) ) ( ( u k ( x ) + δ ) β ( u k ( y ) + δ ) β ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y Ω λ f Q ( x , u ) + u q ( x ) 1 ( ( u k + δ ) β δ β ) d x .

According to Lemma 4.3 and choosing h ( u ) = ( u k + δ ) β , we can deduce

(4.9) Ω × Ω ( ( u k ( x ) + δ ) ( β + p ( x , y ) 1 ) p ( x , y ) ( u k ( y ) + δ ) ( β + p ( x , y ) 1 ) p ( x , y ) ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y Q ( β + p ( x , y ) 1 ) p ( x , y ) β p ( x , y ) p ( x , y ) u ( x ) u ( y ) p ( x , y ) 2 ( u ( x ) u ( y ) ) ( u k ( x ) + δ ) β ( u k ( y ) + δ ) β x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y ( β + p + 1 ) p + β ( p + ) + Ω × Ω u ( x ) u ( y ) p ( x , y ) 2 ( u ( x ) u ( y ) ) ( u k ( x ) + δ ) β ( u k ( y ) + δ ) β x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y ( β + p + 1 ) p + β ( p + ) p + Ω ( λ f Q ( x , u ) + u q ( x ) 1 ) ( ( u k + δ ) β δ β ) d x C 1 ( β + p + 1 ) p + β ( p + ) p + { u 1 } u q ( x ) 1 ( ( u k + δ ) β δ β ) d x C 2 ( β + p + 1 ) p + β ( p + ) p + Ω u q ( x ) 1 ( ( u k + δ ) β δ β ) d x C 3 ( β + p + 1 ) p + β ( p + ) p + u r q ( x ) 1 ( u k + δ ) β t ,

where t = r ( r q ( x ) + 1 ) , ( r ) < ( p s ) . According to the Sobolev embedding theorem from Proposition 2.4, we can obtain

(4.10) Ω × Ω ( ( u k ( x ) + δ ) ( β + p ( x , y ) 1 ) p ( x , y ) ( u k ( y ) + δ ) ( β + p ( x , y ) 1 ) p ( x , y ) ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y C ( u k + δ ) ( β + p ( x , y ) 1 ) p ( x , y ) δ ( β + p ( x , y ) 1 ) p ( x , y ) r p ( x , y ) .

In view of triangle inequality and ( u k + δ ) β + p ( x , y ) 1 δ p ( x , y ) 1 ( u k + δ ) β , we obtain

(4.11) Ω ( ( u k + δ ) ( β + p ( x , y ) 1 ) p ( x , y ) δ ( β + p ( x , y ) 1 ) p ( x , y ) ) r d x p ( x , y ) r δ 2 p ( x , y ) 1 Ω ( u k + δ ) r β p ( x , y ) p ( x , y ) r δ β + p ( x , y ) 1 Ω p ( x , y ) r .

Hence, combining (4.9) and (4.10) with (4.11), we deduce

(4.12) ( u k + δ ) β p ( x , y ) r p ( x , y ) C 1 C 2 δ p ( x , y ) 1 ( β + p + 1 ) p + β ( p + ) + u r q ( x ) 1 ( u k + δ ) β t + δ β Ω p ( x , y ) r .

Therefore, according to Lemma 4.1, we can obtain

(4.13) δ β Ω p ( x , y ) r ( β + p + 1 ) p + β ( p + ) p + Ω p ( x , y ) r 1 t ( u k + δ ) β t ( β + p + 1 ) p + β ( p + ) + Ω p + r 1 t ( u k + δ ) β t .

In view of (4.13) and (4.12), we obtain

(4.14) ( u k + δ ) β p + r p + C 1 1 β β + p + 1 p + p + ( u k + δ ) β t C u r q ( x ) 1 δ p 1 + Ω p + r 1 t .

There exist δ > 0 such that δ p 1 = C u r q ( x ) 1 ( Ω p + r 1 t ) 1 . Moreover, when β 1 , we find that ( ( β + p + 1 ) p + ) p + β p + . And choosing suitable t and r such that η = r t p + > 1 and τ = t β , we can change inequality (4.14) into

(4.15) ( u k + δ ) η τ ( C Ω p + r 1 t ) t τ τ t t τ ( u k + δ ) τ .

Choose τ 0 = t and τ m + 1 = η τ m = η m + 1 t . After using m iterations, one can obtain

(4.16) ( u k + δ ) τ m + 1 ( C Ω p + r 1 t ) i = 0 m t τ i i = 0 m τ i t t τ i p + 1 ( u k + δ ) t .

According to η > 1 , it is obvious that

i = 0 t τ i = i = 0 1 η i = η η 1

and

i = 0 τ i t t τ i p + 1 = η η ( η 1 ) 2 .

Hence, in view of (4.16), we can obtain

(4.17) u k ( C Ω p + r 1 t ) η ( η 1 ) ( C η η ( η 1 ) 2 ) p + 1 ( u k + δ ) t

as k . Moreover, by using the triangle inequality with u k ( u 1 ) + in (4.17), we can deduce that

(4.18) u k C ( η η ( η 1 ) 2 ) p + 1 ( Ω p + r 1 t ) η ( η 1 ) ( ( u 1 ) + t + δ Ω 1 t ) .

Then, letting k in (4.18), we obtain

(4.19) ( u 1 ) + C ( η η ( η 1 ) 2 ) p + 1 ( Ω p + r 1 t ) η ( η 1 ) ( ( u 1 ) + t + δ Ω 1 t ) .

This means that u L ( Ω ) . Therefore, there is T > 0 such that u L T .□

5 Proof of Theorem 1.1

Now, we are ready to prove Theorem 1.1.

Proof

According to Lemma 3.2, for all λ > 0 and Q > 0 , there exists a u λ W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) such that

(5.1) J λ Q ( u λ ) = C λ Q and ( J λ Q ) ( u λ ) = 0 .

Then, we can choose φ 1 W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) , φ 1 > 0 and t 1 > 0 large enough such that J λ Q ( t 1 φ 1 ) < 0 . Furthermore, choosing ψ 1 = t 1 φ 1 , we define the function γ : [ 0 , 1 ] W s , p ( , ) ( Ω ) as γ ( t ) t ψ 1 . According to γ Γ and f Q ( x , γ ( t ) ) = 0 for every x Ω and t [ 0 , 1 ] , we deduce

(5.2) C λ Q max t [ 0 , 1 ] J λ Q ( γ ( t ) ) = max t [ 0 , 1 ] T p ( , ) ( t ψ 1 ) Ω 1 q ( x ) t ψ 1 q ( x ) d x max t [ 0 , 1 ] t p + T p ( , ) ( ψ 1 ) t q + q + Ω ψ 1 q ( x ) d x Λ p , q ,

where Λ p , q is a positive constant, and it is independent of λ and Q , and

Λ p , q = max t [ 0 , + ) t p + T p ( , ) ( ψ 1 ) t q + q + Ω ψ 1 q ( x ) d x .

Furthermore, in view of (5.1), Propositions 2.1 and 2.2, we can obtain that

(5.3) C λ Q = J λ Q ( u λ ) 1 θ ( J λ Q ) ( u λ ) , u λ 1 p + 1 θ Ω Ω u λ ( x ) u λ ( y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y λ τ Ω u n p ( x ) d x 1 p + 1 θ λ τ S q Ω Ω u λ ( x ) u λ ( y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y .

If we set λ 1 0 , θ p + p + θ τ S q , then 1 p + 1 θ λ τ S q 1 Λ 1 > 0 . Hence, in view of (5.2) and (5.3), we can deduce that

(5.4) Λ 1 Λ p , q Ω Ω u λ ( x ) u λ ( y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s p ( x , y ) d x d y u λ p , if u λ > 1 u λ p + , if u λ 1 for all λ ( 0 , λ 1 ) .

So, we obtain

u λ ( Λ 1 Λ p , q ) 1 p + ( Λ 1 Λ p , q ) 1 p + .

According to Lemma 4.4, we can yield that

u λ < T .

Let λ { λ 0 , λ 1 } . Then, for any λ ( 0 , λ 1 ) , u λ is also a solution to Problem (1.1).□

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the reviewers for their constructive remarks on their work.

  1. Funding information: The authors were supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12371455), the Research Foundation of Department of Education of Jilin Province (Grant No. JJKH20230902KJ), the Science and Technology Development Plan Project of Jilin Province, China (Grant No. YDZJ202201ZYTS582), and Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talent Funding Project of Jilin Province (No. 2023QN21).

  2. Author contributions: All authors contributed to the study conception and design. All authors performed material preparation, data collection, and analysis. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state that there is no conflict of interest.

  4. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.

  5. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during this study.

References

[1] E. Acerbi and G. Mingione, Regularity results for stationary electro-rheological fluids, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 164 (2002), 213–259, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-002-0208-7. 10.1007/s00205-002-0208-7Search in Google Scholar

[2] Y. Chen, S. Levine, and M. Rao, Variable exponent linear growth functionals in image restoration, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 66 (2006), 1383–1406, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/050624522. 10.1137/050624522Search in Google Scholar

[3] Z. Guo, J. Sun, D. Zhang, and B. Wu, Adaptive Perona-Malik model based on the variable exponent for image denoising, IEEE Trans. Image Process 21 (2012), 958–967, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2011.2169272. 10.1109/TIP.2011.2169272Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] F. Karami, K. Sadik, and L. Ziad, A variable exponent nonlocal p(x)-Laplacian equation for image restoration, Comput. Math. Appl. 75 (2018), 534–546, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2017.09.034. 10.1016/j.camwa.2017.09.034Search in Google Scholar

[5] W. Orlicz, Über konjugierte exponentenfolgen, Studia Math. 3 (1931), 200–212, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4064/sm-3-1-200-211. 10.4064/sm-3-1-200-211Search in Google Scholar

[6] O. Kovácik and J. Rákosnik, On spaces Lp(x) and W1,p(x), Czechoslovak Math. J. 41 (1991), 592–618. 10.21136/CMJ.1991.102493Search in Google Scholar

[7] J. Yao and X. Wang, Compact imbeddings between variable exponent spaces with unbounded underlying domain, Nonlinear Anal. 70 (2009), 3472–3482, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2008.07.005. 10.1016/j.na.2008.07.005Search in Google Scholar

[8] X. Fan, Sobolev embeddings for unbounded domain with variable exponent having values across N, Math. Inequal. Appl. 13 (2010), 123–134, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7153/mia-13-0910.7153/mia-13-09Search in Google Scholar

[9] V. V. Zhikov, On some variational problems, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 5 (1997), 105–116, https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1486765. Search in Google Scholar

[10] V. D. Rădulescu and D. D. Repovš, Partial Differential Equations with Variable Exponents. Variational Methods and Qualitative Analysis, Monogr. Res. Notes Math. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2015, xxi+301 pp, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b18601.10.1201/b18601Search in Google Scholar

[11] E. J. Hurtado, O. H. Miyagaki, and R. S. Rodrigues, Existence and multiplicity of solutions for a class of elliptic equations without Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz type conditions, J. Dynam. Differential Equations 30 (2018), 405–432, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-016-9542-6. 10.1007/s10884-016-9542-6Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Liu, P. Pucci, H. Wu, and Q. Zhang, Existence and blow-up rate of large solutions of p(x)-Laplacian equations with gradient terms, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 457 (2018), 944–977, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.08.038. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.08.038Search in Google Scholar

[13] P. Pucci and Q. Zhang, Existence of entire solutions for a class of variable exponent elliptic equations, J. Differential Equations 257 (2014), 1529–1566, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2014.05.023. 10.1016/j.jde.2014.05.023Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. A. Ragusa and A. Tachikawa, Regularity for minimizers for functionals of double phase with variable exponents, Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 9 (2020), 710–728, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2020-0022. 10.1515/anona-2020-0022Search in Google Scholar

[15] C. Alves, A. Moussaoui, and L. Tavares, An elliptic system with logarithmic nonlinearity, Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 8 (2017), 928–945, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2017-0200. 10.1515/anona-2017-0200Search in Google Scholar

[16] A. Soni and D. Choudhuri, Existence of multiple solutions to an elliptic problem with measure data, J. Elliptic Parabol. Equ. 4 (2018), 369–388, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41808-018-0024-3. 10.1007/s41808-018-0024-3Search in Google Scholar

[17] S. Ghosh, K. Saoudi, and K. Kratou, Least energy sign-changing solution of fractional p-Laplacian problems involving singularities, Dynam. Partial Differential Equations 17 (2020), 97–155, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4310/DPDE.2020.v17.n2.a1. 10.4310/DPDE.2020.v17.n2.a1Search in Google Scholar

[18] C. O. Alves and L. S. Tavares, A Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev-type inequality for variable exponents and applications to quasilinear Choquard equations involving variable exponent, Mediterr. J. Math. 16 (2019), 1–27, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-019-1316-z. 10.1007/s00009-019-1316-zSearch in Google Scholar

[19] X. Cao, Bin Ge, and Bei Zhang, On a class of p(x)-Lapacian equations without any growth and Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz conditions, J. Differential Equations 26 (2021), 259–280, DOI: https://doi.org/10.57262/ade026-0506-259. 10.57262/ade026-0506-259Search in Google Scholar

[20] H. Brézis and L. Nirenberg, Positive solutions of nonlinear elliptic equations involving critical Sobolev exponents, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 36 (1983), 437–477, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160360405. 10.1002/cpa.3160360405Search in Google Scholar

[21] P. L. Lions, The concentration compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case, Part I, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 1 (1984), 109–145, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0294-1449(16)30428-0. 10.1016/s0294-1449(16)30428-0Search in Google Scholar

[22] P. L. Lions, The concentration compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The limit case, Part II, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 1 (1984), 223–283, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0294-1449(16)30422-X. 10.1016/s0294-1449(16)30422-xSearch in Google Scholar

[23] A. K. Ben-Naouma, C. Troestler, and M. Willem, Extrema problems with critical Sobolev exponents on unbounded domains, Nonlinear Anal. 26 (1996), 823–833, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-546X(94)00324-B. 10.1016/0362-546X(94)00324-BSearch in Google Scholar

[24] J. Chabrowski, Concentration-compactness principle at infinity and semilinear elliptic equations involving critical and subcritical Sobolev exponents, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 3 (1995), 493–512, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01187898. 10.1007/BF01187898Search in Google Scholar

[25] Y. Q. Fu and X. Zhang, Multiple solutions for a class of p(x)-Laplacian equations in Rn involving the critical exponent, Proc. A. 466 (2010), 1667–1686, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2009.0463. 10.1098/rspa.2009.0463Search in Google Scholar

[26] Y. Q. Fu, Existence of solutions for p(x)-Laplacian problem on an unbounded domain, Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 30 (2007), 235–249, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/tmna.2007.028. Search in Google Scholar

[27] S. Liang and J. Zhang, Multiple solutions for a noncooperative p(x)-Laplacian equations in RN involving the critical exponent, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 403 (2013), 344–356, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.01.003. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.01.003Search in Google Scholar

[28] S. Liang and J. Zhang, Infinitely many small solutions for the p(x)-Laplacian operator with nonlinear boundary conditions, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 192 (2013), 1–16, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10231-011-0209-y. 10.1007/s10231-011-0209-ySearch in Google Scholar

[29] A. Sabri, A. Jamea, and H. Talibi Alaoui, Weak solution for fractional (p1,…,pm)-Laplacian system with Dirichlet-type boundary conditions, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 70 (2021), no.3, 1541–1560, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2020-0022. 10.1007/s12215-020-00573-8Search in Google Scholar

[30] D. Applebaum, Lévy processes-from probability to finance and quantum groups, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 51 (2004), 1336–1347. Search in Google Scholar

[31] L. Caffarelli, Nonlocal diffusions, drifts and games, Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations Abel Symp. 7 (2012), 37–52, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25361-4_3. 10.1007/978-3-642-25361-4_3Search in Google Scholar

[32] L. Caffarelli and L. Silvestre, An extension problem related to the fractional Laplacian, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 32 (2007), 1245–1260, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03605300600987306. 10.1080/03605300600987306Search in Google Scholar

[33] G. Molica Bisci, V. Rădulescu, and R. Servadei, Variational Methods for Nonlocal Fractional Equations, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016. 10.1017/CBO9781316282397Search in Google Scholar

[34] U. Kaufmann, J. D. Rossi, and R. Vidal, Fractional Sobolev spaces with variable exponents and fractional p(x)-Laplacians, Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 76 (2017), 1–10, DOI: https://doi.org/10.14232/ejqtde.2017.1.76. 10.14232/ejqtde.2017.1.76Search in Google Scholar

[35] K. Ho and Y. H. Kim, The concentration-compactness principles for Ws,p(⋅,⋅)(RN) and application, Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 10 (2021), 816–848, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2020-0160. 10.1515/anona-2020-0160Search in Google Scholar

[36] E. Azroul, A. Benkirane, and M. Shimi, Existence and multiplicity of solutions for fractional p(x,⋅)-Kirchhoff-type problems in RN, Appl. Anal. 100 (2021), 2029–2048, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2019.1673373. 10.1080/00036811.2019.1673373Search in Google Scholar

[37] M. Xiang, B. Zhang, and D. Yang, Multiplicity results for variable order frational Laplacian with variable growth, Nonlinear Anal. 178 (2019), 190–204, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2018.07.016. 10.1016/j.na.2018.07.016Search in Google Scholar

[38] M. Xiang, D. Yang, and B. Zhang, Homoclinic solutions for Hamiltonian systems with variable-order fractional derivatives, Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 65 (2020), 1412–1432, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17476933.2019.1652281. 10.1080/17476933.2019.1652281Search in Google Scholar

[39] D. E. Edmunds and J. Raskosnik, Sobolev embeddings with variable exponent, Studia Math. 143 (2000), 267–293, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4064/sm-143-3-267-293. 10.4064/sm-143-3-267-293Search in Google Scholar

[40] X. Fan and D. Zhao, On the spaces Lp(x)(Ω) and Wm,p(x)(Ω), J. Math. Anal. Appl. 263 (2001), 424–446. 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7617Search in Google Scholar

[41] B. Cekic and R. A. Mashiyev, Existence and localization results for p(x)-Laplacian via topological methods, Fixed Point Theory 1 (2010), 1–7, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/120646. 10.1155/2010/120646Search in Google Scholar

[42] K. Ho and Y. H. Kim, A-priori bounds and multiplicity of solutions for nonlinear elliptic problems involving the fractional p(⋅)-Laplacian, Nonlinear Anal. 188 (2019), 179–201, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2019.06.001. 10.1016/j.na.2019.06.001Search in Google Scholar

[43] K. Ho, Y. H. Kim, and I. Sim, Existence results for Schrödinger p(⋅)-Laplace equations involving critical growth in RN, Nonlinear Anal. 182 (2019), 20–44. 10.1016/j.na.2018.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-02-10
Revised: 2023-05-04
Accepted: 2023-07-05
Published Online: 2023-10-31

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. A novel class of bipolar soft separation axioms concerning crisp points
  3. Duality for convolution on subclasses of analytic functions and weighted integral operators
  4. Existence of a solution to an infinite system of weighted fractional integral equations of a function with respect to another function via a measure of noncompactness
  5. On the existence of nonnegative radial solutions for Dirichlet exterior problems on the Heisenberg group
  6. Hyers-Ulam stability of isometries on bounded domains-II
  7. Asymptotic study of Leray solution of 3D-Navier-Stokes equations with exponential damping
  8. Semi-Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability for an integro-differential equation of order 𝓃
  9. Jordan triple (α,β)-higher ∗-derivations on semiprime rings
  10. The asymptotic behaviors of solutions for higher-order (m1, m2)-coupled Kirchhoff models with nonlinear strong damping
  11. Approximation of the image of the Lp ball under Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator
  12. Best proximity points in -metric spaces with applications
  13. Approximation spaces inspired by subset rough neighborhoods with applications
  14. A numerical Haar wavelet-finite difference hybrid method and its convergence for nonlinear hyperbolic partial differential equation
  15. A novel conservative numerical approximation scheme for the Rosenau-Kawahara equation
  16. Fekete-Szegö functional for a class of non-Bazilevic functions related to quasi-subordination
  17. On local fractional integral inequalities via generalized ( h ˜ 1 , h ˜ 2 ) -preinvexity involving local fractional integral operators with Mittag-Leffler kernel
  18. On some geometric results for generalized k-Bessel functions
  19. Convergence analysis of M-iteration for 𝒢-nonexpansive mappings with directed graphs applicable in image deblurring and signal recovering problems
  20. Some results of homogeneous expansions for a class of biholomorphic mappings defined on a Reinhardt domain in ℂn
  21. Graded weakly 1-absorbing primary ideals
  22. The existence and uniqueness of solutions to a functional equation arising in psychological learning theory
  23. Some aspects of the n-ary orthogonal and b(αn,βn)-best approximations of b(αn,βn)-hypermetric spaces over Banach algebras
  24. Numerical solution of a malignant invasion model using some finite difference methods
  25. Increasing property and logarithmic convexity of functions involving Dirichlet lambda function
  26. Feature fusion-based text information mining method for natural scenes
  27. Global optimum solutions for a system of (k, ψ)-Hilfer fractional differential equations: Best proximity point approach
  28. The study of solutions for several systems of PDDEs with two complex variables
  29. Regularity criteria via horizontal component of velocity for the Boussinesq equations in anisotropic Lorentz spaces
  30. Generalized Stević-Sharma operators from the minimal Möbius invariant space into Bloch-type spaces
  31. On initial value problem for elliptic equation on the plane under Caputo derivative
  32. A dimension expanded preconditioning technique for block two-by-two linear equations
  33. Asymptotic behavior of Fréchet functional equation and some characterizations of inner product spaces
  34. Small perturbations of critical nonlocal equations with variable exponents
  35. Dynamical property of hyperspace on uniform space
  36. Some notes on graded weakly 1-absorbing primary ideals
  37. On the problem of detecting source points acting on a fluid
  38. Integral transforms involving a generalized k-Bessel function
  39. Ruled real hypersurfaces in the complex hyperbolic quadric
  40. On the monotonic properties and oscillatory behavior of solutions of neutral differential equations
  41. Approximate multi-variable bi-Jensen-type mappings
  42. Mixed-type SP-iteration for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in hyperbolic spaces
  43. On the equation fn + (f″)m ≡ 1
  44. Results on the modified degenerate Laplace-type integral associated with applications involving fractional kinetic equations
  45. Characterizations of entire solutions for the system of Fermat-type binomial and trinomial shift equations in ℂn#
  46. Commentary
  47. On I. Meghea and C. S. Stamin review article “Remarks on some variants of minimal point theorem and Ekeland variational principle with applications,” Demonstratio Mathematica 2022; 55: 354–379
  48. Special Issue on Fixed Point Theory and Applications to Various Differential/Integral Equations - Part II
  49. On Cauchy problem for pseudo-parabolic equation with Caputo-Fabrizio operator
  50. Fixed-point results for convex orbital operators
  51. Asymptotic stability of equilibria for difference equations via fixed points of enriched Prešić operators
  52. Asymptotic behavior of resolvents of equilibrium problems on complete geodesic spaces
  53. A system of additive functional equations in complex Banach algebras
  54. New inertial forward–backward algorithm for convex minimization with applications
  55. Uniqueness of solutions for a ψ-Hilfer fractional integral boundary value problem with the p-Laplacian operator
  56. Analysis of Cauchy problem with fractal-fractional differential operators
  57. Common best proximity points for a pair of mappings with certain dominating property
  58. Investigation of hybrid fractional q-integro-difference equations supplemented with nonlocal q-integral boundary conditions
  59. The structure of fuzzy fractals generated by an orbital fuzzy iterated function system
  60. On the structure of self-affine Jordan arcs in ℝ2
  61. Solvability for a system of Hadamard-type hybrid fractional differential inclusions
  62. Three solutions for discrete anisotropic Kirchhoff-type problems
  63. On split generalized equilibrium problem with multiple output sets and common fixed points problem
  64. Special Issue on Computational and Numerical Methods for Special Functions - Part II
  65. Sandwich-type results regarding Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of q-hypergeometric function
  66. Certain aspects of Nörlund -statistical convergence of sequences in neutrosophic normed spaces
  67. On completeness of weak eigenfunctions for multi-interval Sturm-Liouville equations with boundary-interface conditions
  68. Some identities on generalized harmonic numbers and generalized harmonic functions
  69. Study of degenerate derangement polynomials by λ-umbral calculus
  70. Normal ordering associated with λ-Stirling numbers in λ-shift algebra
  71. Analytical and numerical analysis of damped harmonic oscillator model with nonlocal operators
  72. Compositions of positive integers with 2s and 3s
  73. Kinematic-geometry of a line trajectory and the invariants of the axodes
  74. Hahn Laplace transform and its applications
  75. Discrete complementary exponential and sine integral functions
  76. Special Issue on Recent Methods in Approximation Theory - Part II
  77. On the order of approximation by modified summation-integral-type operators based on two parameters
  78. Bernstein-type operators on elliptic domain and their interpolation properties
  79. A class of strongly convergent subgradient extragradient methods for solving quasimonotone variational inequalities
  80. Special Issue on Recent Advances in Fractional Calculus and Nonlinear Fractional Evaluation Equations - Part II
  81. Application of fractional quantum calculus on coupled hybrid differential systems within the sequential Caputo fractional q-derivatives
  82. On some conformable boundary value problems in the setting of a new generalized conformable fractional derivative
  83. A certain class of fractional difference equations with damping: Oscillatory properties
  84. Weighted Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for r-times differentiable preinvex functions for k-fractional integrals
  85. Special Issue on Recent Advances for Computational and Mathematical Methods in Scientific Problems - Part II
  86. The behavior of hidden bifurcation in 2D scroll via saturated function series controlled by a coefficient harmonic linearization method
  87. Phase portraits of two classes of quadratic differential systems exhibiting as solutions two cubic algebraic curves
  88. Petri net analysis of a queueing inventory system with orbital search by the server
  89. Asymptotic stability of an epidemiological fractional reaction-diffusion model
  90. On the stability of a strongly stabilizing control for degenerate systems in Hilbert spaces
  91. Special Issue on Application of Fractional Calculus: Mathematical Modeling and Control - Part I
  92. New conticrete inequalities of the Hermite-Hadamard-Jensen-Mercer type in terms of generalized conformable fractional operators via majorization
  93. Pell-Lucas polynomials for numerical treatment of the nonlinear fractional-order Duffing equation
  94. Impacts of Brownian motion and fractional derivative on the solutions of the stochastic fractional Davey-Stewartson equations
  95. Some results on fractional Hahn difference boundary value problems
  96. Properties of a subclass of analytic functions defined by Riemann-Liouville fractional integral applied to convolution product of multiplier transformation and Ruscheweyh derivative
  97. Special Issue on Development of Fuzzy Sets and Their Extensions - Part I
  98. The cross-border e-commerce platform selection based on the probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy generalized dice similarity measures
  99. Comparison of fuzzy and crisp decision matrices: An evaluation on PROBID and sPROBID multi-criteria decision-making methods
  100. Rejection and symmetric difference of bipolar picture fuzzy graph
Downloaded on 25.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dema-2023-0266/html
Scroll to top button