Home Mathematics Asymptotic study of Leray solution of 3D-Navier-Stokes equations with exponential damping
Article Open Access

Asymptotic study of Leray solution of 3D-Navier-Stokes equations with exponential damping

  • Mongi Blel EMAIL logo and Jamel Benameur
Published/Copyright: March 13, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

We study the uniqueness, the continuity in L 2 , and the large time decay for the Leray solutions of the 3D incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with the nonlinear exponential damping term a ( e b u 2 1 ) u , ( a , b > 0 ).

1 Introduction

In this article, we investigate the questions of the existence, uniqueness, and asymptotic study of global weak solution to the following modified incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in R 3 :

t u ν Δ u + u u + a ( e b u 2 1 ) u = p in R + × R 3 div u = 0 in R + × R 3 u ( 0 , x ) = u 0 ( x ) in R 3 , a , b > 0 , ( S )

where u = u ( t , x ) = ( u 1 , u 2 , u 3 ) and p = p ( t , x ) denote, respectively, the unknown velocity and the unknown pressure of the fluid at the point ( t , x ) R + × R 3 . The function ν denotes the viscosity of the fluid and u 0 = ( u 1 0 ( x ) , u 2 0 ( x ) , u 3 0 ( x ) ) is the initial given velocity. The damping of the system comes from the resistance to the motion of the flow. It describes various physical situations, such as porous media flow, drag or friction effects, and some dissipative mechanisms (see [14] and references therein). The fact that div u = 0 allows us to write the term ( u u ) u 1 1 u + u 2 2 u + u 3 3 u in the following form: div ( u u ) ( div ( u 1 u ) , div ( u 2 u ) , div ( u 3 u ) ) . If the initial velocity u 0 is quite regular, the divergence-free condition determines uniquely the pressure p .

Without the loss of generality and in order to simplify the proofs of our results, we consider the viscosity unitary ( ν = 1 ).

The global existence of weak solution to the initial value problem of classical incompressible Navier-Stokes was proved by Leray and Hopf (see [5,6]) long before. Uniqueness remains an open problem if the dimension d 3 .

Polynomial damping α u β 1 u is studied in [7] by Cai and Jiu. They proved the global existence of weak solution in

L ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) L 2 ( R + , H ˙ 1 ( R 3 ) ) L β + 1 ( R + , L β + 1 ( R 3 ) ) .

The exponential damping a ( e b u 2 1 ) u is studied in [8] by Benameur. He proved the existence of a global weak solution in

L ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) L 2 ( R + , H ˙ 1 ( R 3 ) ) b ,

where b = { f : R + × R 3 R : measurable , ( e b f 2 1 ) f 2 L 1 ( R + × R 3 ) } .

The purpose of this article is to prove the uniqueness and the continuity of the global solution given in [8]. Using the Friedrich method, we construct approximate solutions and make more delicate estimates to proceed with the compactness arguments. In particular, we obtain some new a priori estimates as follows:

u ( t ) L 2 2 + 2 0 t u ( s ) L 2 2 d s + 2 a 0 t ( e b u ( s ) 2 1 ) u ( s ) 2 L 1 d s u 0 L 2 2 .

To prove its uniqueness, we use the energy method and approximate systems. The proof of the asymptotic study is based on a decomposition of the solution in high and low frequencies and the uniqueness of such solution in a well-chosen time t 0 .

In our case of exponential damping, we find more regularity of Leray solution in p L p ( R + , L p ( R 3 ) ) . In particular, we give a new energy estimate. Our main result is the following:

Theorem 1.1

Let u 0 L 2 ( R 3 ) be a divergence-free vector fields, then there is a unique global solution of the system ( S ) : u C b ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) L 2 ( R + , H ˙ 1 ( R 3 ) ) b . Moreover, for all t 0 ,

(1.1) u ( t ) L 2 2 + 2 0 t u ( s ) L 2 2 d s + 2 a 0 t ( e b u ( s ) 2 1 ) u ( s ) 2 L 1 d s u 0 L 2 2 .

Moreover, we have

(1.2) limsup t u ( t ) L 2 = 0 .

Remark 1.2

  1. The new results in this theorem are the uniqueness, the continuity of the global weak solution in L 2 ( R 3 ) , and its asymptotic behavior at infinity.

  2. The uniqueness of weak solution implies that

    (1.3) u ( t 2 ) L 2 2 + 2 t 1 t 2 u ( s ) L 2 2 d s + 2 a t 1 t 2 ( e b u ( s ) 2 1 ) u ( s ) 2 L 1 d s u ( t 1 ) L 2 2 ,

    which implies that ( t u ( t ) L 2 ) is decreasing.

2 Notations and preliminary results

The Friedrich operator J R is defined for R > 0 by: J R ( D ) f = 1 ( χ B R f ^ ) , where B R is the ball of center 0 and radius R and f L 2 ( R 3 ) . The Leray operator P is the projector operator of ( L 2 ( R 3 ) ) 3 on the space of divergence-free vector fields L σ 2 ( R 3 ) .

If f is in the Schwartz space ( S ( R n ) ) 3 ,

( P f ) = f ^ ( ξ ) f ^ ( ξ ) . ξ ξ ξ ξ = M ( ξ ) f ^ ( ξ )

and ( P f ) k ( x ) = 1 ( 2 π ) 3 2 R 3 δ k j ξ k ξ j ξ 2 f ^ j ( ξ ) e i ξ x d ξ , where M ( ξ ) is the matrix ( δ k , ξ k ξ ξ 2 ) 1 k , 3 .

Define also the operator A R ( D ) on L 2 ( R 3 ) by:

A R ( D ) u = P J R ( D ) u = 1 ( M ( ξ ) χ B R ( ξ ) u ^ ) .

To simplify the exposition of the main result, we first collect some preliminary results and give some new technical lemmas.

Proposition 2.1

[9] Let H be a Hilbert space.

  1. The unit ball is weakly compact, i.e., if ( x n ) is a bounded sequence in H, then there is a subsequence ( x φ ( n ) ) such that

    ( x φ ( n ) y ) ( x y ) , y H .

  2. If x H and ( x n ) is a bounded sequence in H such that lim n + ( x n y ) = ( x y ) , for all y H , then x liminf n x n .

  3. If x H and ( x n ) is a bounded sequence in H such that lim n + ( x n y ) = ( x y ) , for all y H and limsup n x n x , then lim n x n x = 0 .

We recall the following product law in the homogeneous Sobolev spaces:

Lemma 2.2

[10] Let s 1 and s 2 be two real numbers and d N .

  1. If s 1 < d 2 and s 1 + s 2 > 0 , there exists a constant C 1 = C 1 ( d , s 1 , s 2 ) such that: if f , g H ˙ s 1 ( R d ) H ˙ s 2 ( R d ) , then f . g H ˙ s 1 + s 2 d 2 ( R d ) and

    f g H ˙ s 1 + s 2 d 2 C 1 ( f H ˙ s 1 g H ˙ s 2 + f H ˙ s 2 g H ˙ s 1 ) .

  2. If s 1 , s 2 < d 2 and s 1 + s 2 > 0 , there exists a constant C 2 = C 2 ( d , s 1 , s 2 ) such that: if f H ˙ s 1 ( R d ) and g H ˙ s 2 ( R d ) , then f . g H ˙ s 1 + s 2 d 2 ( R d ) and

    f g H ˙ s 1 + s 2 d 2 C 2 f H ˙ s 1 g H ˙ s 2 .

Lemma 2.3

[11] Let β > 0 and d N . Then, for all x , y R d , we have

(2.1) x β x y β y , x y 1 2 ( x β + y β ) x y 2 ,

and

(2.2) ( e b x 2 1 ) x ( e b y 2 1 ) y , x y 1 2 ( ( e b x 2 1 ) + ( e b y 2 1 ) ) x y 2 .

Proposition 2.4

[8] Let ν 1 , ν 2 , ν 3 [ 0 , ) , r 1 , r 2 , r 3 ( 0 , ) , and f 0 L σ 2 ( R 3 ) .

For n N , let F n : R + × R 3 R 3 be a measurable function in C 1 ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) such that

A n ( D ) F n = F n , F n ( 0 , x ) = A n ( D ) f 0 ( x )

and

  1. t F n + k = 1 3 ν k D k 2 r k F n + A n ( D ) div ( F n F n ) + A n ( D ) h ( F n ) F n = 0 .

  2. F n ( t , ) L 2 2 + 2 k = 1 3 ν k 0 t D k r k F n ( s , ) L 2 2 d s + 2 a 0 t h ( F n ( s , ) ) F n ( s , ) 2 L 1 d s f 0 L 2 2 ,

where h ( λ ) = a ( e b λ 2 1 ) , with a , b > 0 . Then, for every ε > 0 , there is δ = δ ( ε , a , b , ν 1 , ν 2 , ν 3 , r 1 , r 2 , r 3 , f 0 L 2 ) > 0 such that for all t 1 , t 2 R + , we have

(2.3) ( t 2 t 1 < δ F n ( t 2 ) F n ( t 1 ) H s 0 < ε ) , n N ,

with s 0 max ( 3 , 2 r 1 , 2 r 2 , 2 r 3 ) .

Lemma 2.5

Let a , b > 0 , then there is a unique real λ 0 = λ 0 ( a , b ) 0 such that for all λ 0 ,

a ( e b λ 1 ) λ λ [ 0 , λ 0 ] .

Precisely,

  • if a b 1 , we have λ 0 = 0 ,

  • if a b < 1 , we have λ 0 > 1 b log ( 1 / a b ) .

3 Proof of the main Theorem 1.1

The proof of the theorem is given in four steps:

3.1 Existence of weak solution

In this step, we build approximate solutions of the system ( S ) inspired by the method used in [8,10], hence we construct a global solution. For this, consider the approximate system with parameter n N as follows:

( S n ) t u Δ J n u + J n ( J n u J n u ) + a J n [ ( e b J n u 2 1 ) J n u ] = p n in R + × R 3 p n = ( Δ ) 1 ( div J n ( J n u J n u ) + a div J n [ ( e b J n u 2 1 ) J n u ] ) div u = 0 in R + × R 3 u ( 0 , x ) = J n u 0 ( x ) in R 3 .

J n is the Friedrich operator defined in the section 2.

  • By Cauchy-Lipschitz theorem, we obtain a unique solution u n C 1 ( R + , L σ 2 ( R 3 ) ) of ( S 2 , n ) . Moreover, J n u n = u n such that

    (3.1) u n ( t ) L 2 2 + 2 0 t u n L 2 2 + 2 a 0 t ( e b u n 2 1 ) u n 2 L 1 u 0 L 2 2 .

  • The sequence ( u n ) n is bounded on L ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) and L 2 ( R + , H ˙ 1 ( R 3 ) ) . Using Proposition 2.4 and the interpolation method, we deduce that the sequence ( u n ) n is equicontinuous on H 1 ( R 3 ) .

  • Let ( T q ) q be a strictly increasing sequence such that lim q + T q = . Consider a sequence of functions ( θ q ) q in C 0 ( R 3 ) such that

    θ q ( x ) = 1 , for x q + 5 4 θ q ( x ) = 0 , for x q + 2 0 θ q 1 .

    Using (3.1), the equicontinuity of the sequence ( u n ) n on H 1 ( R 3 ) , and the classical argument by combining Ascoli’s theorem and the Cantor diagonal process, there exists a subsequence ( u φ ( n ) ) n and u L ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) C ( R + , H 3 ( R 3 ) ) such that for all q N ,

    (3.2) lim n θ q ( u φ ( n ) u ) L ( [ 0 , T q ] , H 4 ) = 0 .

    In particular, the sequence ( u φ ( n ) ( t ) ) n converges weakly in L 2 ( R 3 ) to u ( t ) for all t 0 .

  • Combining the above inequalities, we obtain

    (3.3) u ( t ) L 2 2 + 2 0 t u ( s ) L 2 2 d s + 2 a 0 t ( e b u ( s ) 2 1 ) u ( s ) 2 L 1 d s u 0 L 2 2 ,

    for all t 0 .

  • u is a solution to the system ( S ) .

3.2 Continuity of the solution in L 2

In this section, we give a simple proof of continuity of the solution u of the system ( S ) , and we prove also that u C ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) . The construction of the solution is based on the Friedrich approximation method. We point out that we can use this method to show the same results as in [4].

  • By inequality (3.3), we obtain

    limsup t 0 u ( t ) L 2 u 0 L 2 .

    Then, proposition 2.1-(3) implies that

    limsup t 0 u ( t ) u 0 L 2 = 0 ,

    which ensures the continuity of u at 0.

  • Consider the functions

    v n , ε ( t , ) = u φ ( n ) ( t + ε , ) , p n , ε ( t , ) = p φ ( n ) ( t + ε , ) ,

    for n N and ε > 0 . We have

t u φ ( n ) Δ u φ ( n ) + J φ ( n ) ( u φ ( n ) u φ ( n ) ) + a J φ ( n ) ( e b u φ ( n ) 2 1 ) u φ ( n ) = p φ ( n ) t v n , ε Δ v n , ε + J φ ( n ) ( v n , ε v n , ε ) + a J φ ( n ) ( e b v n , ε 4 1 ) v n , ε = p n , ε .

The function w n , ε = u φ ( n ) v n , ε fulfills the following:

t w n , ε Δ w n , ε + a J φ ( n ) ( ( e b u φ ( n ) 2 1 ) u φ ( n ) ( e b v n , ε 2 1 ) v n , ε ) = ( p φ ( n ) p n , ε ) + J φ ( n ) ( w n , ε w n , ε ) J φ ( n ) ( w n , ε u φ ( n ) ) J φ ( n ) ( u φ ( n ) w n , ε ) .

Taking the scalar product in L 2 ( R 3 ) with w n , ε and using the properties div w n , ε = 0 and w n , ε w n , ε , w n , ε = 0 , we obtain

(3.4) 1 2 d d t w n , ε L 2 2 + w n , ε L 2 2 + a J φ ( n ) ( ( e b u φ ( n ) 2 1 ) u φ ( n ) ( e b v n , ε 4 1 ) v n , ε ) ; w n , ε L 2 = J φ ( n ) ( w n , ε u φ ( n ) ) ; w n , ε L 2 .

Using inequality (2.2), we obtain

J φ ( n ) ( ( e b u φ ( n ) 2 1 ) u φ ( n ) ( e b v n , ε 2 1 ) v n , ε ) ; w n , ε L 2 = ( e b u φ ( n ) 2 1 ) u φ ( n ) ( e b v n , ε 2 1 ) v n , ε ; J φ ( n ) w n , ε L 2 = ( e b u φ ( n ) 2 1 ) u φ ( n ) ( e b v n , ε 2 1 ) v n , ε ; w n , ε L 2 1 2 R 3 ( ( e b u φ ( n ) 2 1 ) + ( e b v n , ε 2 1 ) ) w n , ε 2 1 2 R 3 ( e b u φ ( n ) 2 1 ) w n , ε 2 ,

J φ ( n ) ( w n , ε u φ ( n ) ) ; w n , ε L 2 R 3 w n , ε . u φ ( n ) . w n , ε 1 2 R 3 w n , ε 2 u φ ( n ) 2 + 1 2 w n , ε L 2 2 .

Combining the identity (2.2) and the inequality (3.4), we obtain

d d t w n , ε L 2 2 + w n , ε L 2 2 + a R 3 ( e b u φ ( n ) 2 1 ) w n , ε 2 R 3 w n , ε 2 u φ ( n ) 2 .

Using Lemma 2.5, we obtain the following:

If a b 1

d d t w n , ε L 2 2 + w n , ε L 2 2 0 .

If a b < 1 , we have

d d t w n , ε L 2 2 + w n , ε L 2 2 + a R 3 ( e b u φ ( n ) 2 1 ) w n , ε 2 + A t w n , ε 2 u φ ( n ) 2 ,

where A n , t = { x R 3 / a ( e b u φ ( n ) ( t , x ) 2 1 ) < u φ ( n ) ( t , x ) 2 } . Then, also by Lemma 2.5, we obtain

x A n , t u φ ( n ) ( t , x ) 2 λ 0 ,

which implies that

d d t w n , ε L 2 2 + w n , ε L 2 2 λ 0 A t w n , ε 2 λ 0 w n , ε L 2 2 .

In all cases, we obtain

d d t w n , ε L 2 2 λ 0 w n , ε L 2 2 .

By Gronwall lemma, we obtain

w n , ε ( t ) L 2 2 w n , ε ( 0 ) L 2 2 e λ 0 t .

Then,

u φ ( n ) ( t + ε ) u φ ( n ) ( t ) L 2 2 u φ ( n ) ( ε ) u φ ( n ) ( 0 ) L 2 2 e λ 0 t .

For t 0 > 0 and ε ( 0 , t 0 ) , we have

u φ ( n ) ( t 0 + ε ) u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ) L 2 2 u φ ( n ) ( ε ) u φ ( n ) ( 0 ) L 2 2 exp ( 2 λ 0 t 0 ) , u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ε ) u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ) L 2 2 u φ ( n ) ( ε ) u φ ( n ) ( 0 ) L 2 2 exp ( 2 λ 0 t 0 ) .

So

u φ ( n ) ( ε ) u φ ( n ) ( 0 ) L 2 2 = J φ ( n ) u φ ( n ) ( ε ) J φ ( n ) u φ ( n ) ( 0 ) L 2 2 = χ φ ( n ) ( u φ ( n ) ^ u 0 ^ ) φ ( n ) 2 u φ ( n ) ( ε ) u 0 L 2 2 2 u 0 L 2 2 2 Re u φ ( n ) ( ε ) , u 0 .

But lim n + u φ ( n ) ( ε ) , u 0 = u ( ε ) , u 0 . Hence,

liminf n u φ ( n ) ( ε ) u φ ( n ) ( 0 ) L 2 2 2 u 0 L 2 2 2 Re u ( ε ) ; u 0 L 2 .

Moreover, for all q , N N ,

J N ( θ q . ( u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ± ε ) u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ) ) ) L 2 2 θ q . ( u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ± ε ) u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ) ) L 2 2 u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ± ε ) u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ) L 2 2 .

Using (3.2), we obtain, for q big enough,

J N ( θ q . ( u ( t 0 ± ε ) u ( t 0 ) ) ) L 2 2 liminf n u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ± ε ) u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ) L 2 2 .

Then,

J N ( θ q . ( u ( t 0 ± ε ) u ( t 0 ) ) ) L 2 2 2 ( u 0 L 2 2 Re u ( ε ) ; u 0 L 2 ) exp ( 2 λ 0 t 0 ) .

By applying the monotone convergence theorem in the order N and q , we obtain

u ( t 0 ± ε , ) u ( t 0 , ) L 2 2 2 ( u 0 L 2 2 Re u ( ε ) ; u 0 L 2 ) exp ( 2 λ 0 t 0 ) .

Using the continuity at 0 and make ε 0 , we obtain the continuity at t 0 .

3.3 Uniqueness of the solution

Let u and v be two solutions of ( S ) in the space

C b ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) L 2 ( R + , H ˙ 1 ( R 3 ) ) b .

The function w = u v satisfies the following:

t w Δ w + a ( ( e b u 2 1 ) u ( e b v 2 1 ) v ) = ( p p ˜ ) + w w w u u w .

Taking the scalar product in L 2 with w , we obtain

1 2 d d t w L 2 2 + w L 2 2 + a ( ( e b u 2 1 ) u ( e b v 2 1 ) v ) ; w L 2 = w u ; w L 2 .

The idea is to lower the term ( ( e b u 2 1 ) u ( e b v 2 1 ) v ) ; w L 2 with the help of Lemma 2.3, and then divide the term find into two equal pieces, one to absorb the nonlinear term and the other is used in the last inequality.

By using inequality (2.2), we obtain

( ( e b u 2 1 ) u ( e b v 2 1 ) v ) ; w L 2 1 2 R 3 ( ( e b u 4 1 ) + ( e b v 4 1 ) ) w 2 1 2 R 3 ( e b u 4 1 ) w 2 .

Moreover, we have

w u ; w L 2 = div ( w u ) ; w L 2 = w u ; w L 2 R 3 w u w 1 2 R 3 w 2 u 2 + 1 2 w L 2 2

Combining the above inequalities, we obtain

d d t w L 2 2 + w L 2 2 + a R 3 ( e b u 2 1 ) w 2 R 3 w 2 u 2 .

By using Lemma 2.5 and the set

A t = { x R 3 / a ( e b u 2 1 ) < u ( t , x ) 2 } ,

we obtain

d d t w L 2 2 λ 0 w L 2 2 .

and Gronwall lemma provides

w L 2 2 w 0 L 2 2 e λ 0 t .

As w 0 = 0 , then w = 0 and u = v , which implies uniqueness.

3.4 Asymptotic study of the global solution

In this subsection, we prove the asymptotic behavior (1.2). Here, we use a modified version of the Benameur-Selmi method [12]. The idea is to write the nonlinear term of exponential type as follows:

a ( e b u 2 1 ) u = a ( e b u 2 1 b u 2 ) u + a u 2 u .

The first term can be treated by the same method as in [13]. So it remains to deal with the second term.

For this, let ε > 0 be positive real number. For δ > 0 , put the following functions:

v δ = 1 ( 1 B ( 0 , δ ) ( ξ ) u ^ ( ξ ) ) , w δ = u v δ .

We have

v δ = k = 1 4 f δ , k ( t ) ,

where

f δ , 1 = e t Δ v δ 0 , v δ 0 = 1 ( 1 B ( 0 , δ ) ( ξ ) u 0 ^ ( ξ ) ) , f δ , 2 = 0 t e ( t z ) Δ 1 B ( 0 , δ ) ( D ) P div ( u u ) , f δ , 3 = a 0 t e ( t z ) Δ 1 B ( 0 , δ ) ( D ) P ( e b u 2 1 b u 2 ) u , f δ , 4 = 0 t e ( t z ) Δ 1 B ( 0 , δ ) ( D ) P ( u 2 u ) .

  • We have

    f δ , 1 ( t ) L 2 v δ 0 L 2 .

    As lim δ 0 v δ 0 L 2 = 0 , then there is δ 1 > 0 such that

    (3.5) sup t 0 f δ , 1 ( t ) L 2 < ε / 8 , 0 < δ < δ 1 .

  • We have

    f δ , 2 ( t ) H 1 / 4 0 t e ( t z ) Δ 1 B ( 0 , δ ) ( D ) P div ( u u ) H 1 / 4 0 t 1 B ( 0 , δ ) div ( u u ) H 1 / 4 0 t 1 B ( 0 , δ ) D ( u u ) H 1 / 4 0 t 1 B ( 0 , δ ) D ( u u ) H 1 / 4 δ 1 / 4 0 t 1 B ( 0 , δ ) D 3 / 4 ( u u ) H ˙ 1 / 4 δ 1 / 4 0 t D 3 / 4 ( u u ) H ˙ 1 / 4

    δ 1 / 4 0 t ( u u ) H ˙ 1 / 2 C δ 1 / 4 0 t u H ˙ 1 2 , ( s 1 + s 2 = 2 , s 1 = s 2 = 1 ) C u 0 L 2 2 δ 1 / 4 .

    However, if

    f δ , 2 ( t ) L 2 c 0 ( 1 + δ 2 ) 1 / 4 f δ , 2 ( t ) H 1 / 4 ,

    then

    f δ , 2 ( t ) L 2 c 0 C u 0 L 2 2 ( 1 + δ 2 ) 1 / 4 δ 1 / 4 .

    Then there is δ 2 > 0 such that

    (3.6) sup t 0 f δ , 2 ( t ) L 2 < ε / 8 , 0 < δ < δ 2 .

  • We have

    f δ , 3 ( t ) H 2 0 t e ( t z ) Δ 1 B ( 0 , δ ) ( D ) P ( e b u 2 1 b u 2 ) u H 2 0 t 1 B ( 0 , δ ) ( D ) ( e b u 2 1 b u 2 ) u H 2 R δ 0 t ( e b u 2 1 b u 2 ) u L 1 ,

    where

    R δ = 1 B ( 0 , δ ) ( D ) H 2 = B ( 0 , δ ) 1 ( 1 + ξ 2 ) 2 d ξ 1 / 2 B ( 0 , δ ) d ξ 1 / 2 = c 0 δ 3 / 2 .

    By using the elementary inequality with M b > 0

    ( e b z 2 1 b z 2 ) z M b ( e b z 2 1 ) z 2 , z 0 ,

    we obtain

    0 t ( e b u 2 1 b u 2 ) u L 1 M b 0 t ( e b u 2 1 ) u 2 L 1 ( 2 a ) 1 M b u 0 L 2 2 .

    Combining the above inequalities, we obtain

    f δ , 3 ( t ) H 2 c 0 ( 2 a ) 1 M b u 0 L 2 2 δ 3 / 2 .

    However, if

    f δ , 3 ( t ) L 2 c 0 ( 1 + δ 2 ) 2 f δ , 2 ( t ) H 2 ,

    then

    f δ , 3 ( t ) L 2 c 0 ( 2 a ) 1 M b u 0 L 2 2 ( 1 + δ 2 ) 2 δ 3 / 2 .

    Then there is δ 3 > 0 such that

    (3.7) a sup t 0 f δ , 3 ( t ) L 2 < ε / 8 , 0 < δ < δ 3 .

  • By using Lemma 2.2 with the well choice of s 1 and s 2 , we obtain

    f δ , 4 ( t ) H 1 / 2 0 t e ( t z ) Δ 1 B ( 0 , δ ) ( D ) P u 2 u H 1 / 2 0 t 1 B ( 0 , δ ) ( D ) u 2 u H 1 / 2 0 t 1 B ( 0 , δ ) ( D ) u 2 u H ˙ 1 / 2 0 t 1 B ( 0 , δ ) ( D ) D 1 / 2 D 1 / 2 u 2 u H ˙ 1 / 2 δ 1 / 2 0 t 1 B ( 0 , δ ) ( D ) D 1 / 2 u 2 u H ˙ 1 / 2 δ 1 / 2 0 t D 1 / 2 u 2 u H ˙ 1 / 2 δ 1 / 2 0 t u 2 u H ˙ 1 δ 1 / 2 C 0 t u H ˙ 1 / 2 u 2 L 2 , ( s 1 + s 2 = 1 / 2 , s 1 = 0 , s 2 = 1 / 2 ) δ 1 / 2 C 0 t u H ˙ 1 / 2 2 u H ˙ 1 , ( s 1 + s 2 = 3 / 2 , s 1 = 1 / 2 , s 2 = 1 ) , δ 1 / 2 C 0 t u L 2 u H ˙ 1 2 , ( by interpolation ) , δ 1 / 2 C u 0 L 2 0 t u L 2 2 δ 1 / 2 C u 0 L 2 3 .

    However, if

    f δ , 4 ( t ) L 2 c 0 ( 1 + δ 2 ) 1 / 2 f δ , 2 ( t ) H 1 / 2 ,

    then

    f δ , 4 ( t ) L 2 c 0 C u 0 L 2 3 ( 1 + δ 2 ) 1 / 2 δ 1 / 2 .

    Then there is δ 4 > 0 such that

    (3.8) sup t 0 f δ , 4 ( t ) L 2 < ε / 8 , 0 < δ < δ 4 .

    Combining the equations (3.5)–(3.8), we obtain

    (3.9) sup t 0 v δ 0 ( t ) L 2 < ε / 2 , δ 0 = 1 2 min 1 i 4 δ i .

On the other hand, we have

0 w δ 0 ( t ) L 2 2 d t δ 0 2 0 w δ 0 ( t ) L 2 2 d t δ 0 2 0 w δ 0 ( t ) L 2 2 d t δ 0 2 u 0 L 2 2 .

As ( t w δ 0 ( t ) L 2 2 ) is continuous, then there is a time t 0 0 such that

(3.10) w δ 0 ( t 0 ) L 2 2 < ε / 2 .

Combining inequalities (3.9) and (3.10), we obtain

u ( t 0 ) L 2 v δ 0 ( t 0 ) L 2 + w δ 0 ( t 0 ) L 2 < ε .

As ( t w δ 0 ( t ) L 2 2 ) is decreasing, then

u ( t ) L 2 < ε , t t 0 .

which completes the proof.

Acknowledgment

This project is supported by Researchers Supporting Project RSPD2023R753, the King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

  1. Funding information: This research has received funding support from the King Saud University, Project RSPD2023R753.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state that there is no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during this study.

References

[1] D. Bresch and B. Desjardins, Existence of global weak solutions for a 2D viscous shallow water equations and convergence to the quasi-geostrophic model, Comm. Math. Phys. 238 (2003), 211–223. 10.1007/s00220-003-0859-8Search in Google Scholar

[2] D. Bresch, B. Desjardins, and C.-K. Lin, On some compressible fluid models: Korteweg, lubrication, and shallow water systems, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 28 (2003), no. 3–4, 843–868. 10.1081/PDE-120020499Search in Google Scholar

[3] L. Hsiao, Quasilinear Hyperbolic Systems and Dissipative Mechanisms, World Scientific, Singapore, 1997. 10.1142/3538Search in Google Scholar

[4] F. M. Huang and R. H. Pan, Convergence rate for compressible Euler equations with damping and vacuum, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 166 (2003), 359–76. 10.1007/s00205-002-0234-5Search in Google Scholar

[5] E. Hopf, On the initial value problem for the basic equations of hydrodynamics, Math. Nachr. 4 (1951), 213. 10.1002/mana.3210040121Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. Leray, Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace, Acta Math. 63 (1934), 193–248. 10.1007/BF02547354Search in Google Scholar

[7] X. Cai and Q. Jiu, Weak and strong solutions for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with damping, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 343 (2008), 799–809. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.01.041Search in Google Scholar

[8] J. Benameur, Global weak solution of 3D Navier-Stokes equations with exponential damping, Open Math. 20 (2022), 590–607.10.1515/math-2022-0050Search in Google Scholar

[9] H. Brezis, Analyse Fonctionnelle: Théorie et applications, Masson, 1996. Search in Google Scholar

[10] J.-Y. Chemin, About Navier-Stokes equations, Publications of Jacques-Louis Lions Laboratory, Paris VI University, 1996, p. R96023. Search in Google Scholar

[11] J. Benameur and M. Ltifi, Strong solution of 3D-NSE with exponential damping, 2021, arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.16707. 10.1515/math-2022-0050Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Benameur and R. Selmi, Long time decay to the Leray solution of the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations, Bull. London Math. Soc. 44 (2012), 1001–1019. 10.1112/blms/bds033Search in Google Scholar

[13] M. Blel and J. Benameur, Long time decay of leray solution of 3D-NSE with exponential damping. Fractals. 30 (2022), no. 10, 2240236.10.1142/S0218348X22402368Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-09-20
Revised: 2023-01-12
Accepted: 2023-01-30
Published Online: 2023-03-13

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. A novel class of bipolar soft separation axioms concerning crisp points
  3. Duality for convolution on subclasses of analytic functions and weighted integral operators
  4. Existence of a solution to an infinite system of weighted fractional integral equations of a function with respect to another function via a measure of noncompactness
  5. On the existence of nonnegative radial solutions for Dirichlet exterior problems on the Heisenberg group
  6. Hyers-Ulam stability of isometries on bounded domains-II
  7. Asymptotic study of Leray solution of 3D-Navier-Stokes equations with exponential damping
  8. Semi-Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability for an integro-differential equation of order 𝓃
  9. Jordan triple (α,β)-higher ∗-derivations on semiprime rings
  10. The asymptotic behaviors of solutions for higher-order (m1, m2)-coupled Kirchhoff models with nonlinear strong damping
  11. Approximation of the image of the Lp ball under Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator
  12. Best proximity points in -metric spaces with applications
  13. Approximation spaces inspired by subset rough neighborhoods with applications
  14. A numerical Haar wavelet-finite difference hybrid method and its convergence for nonlinear hyperbolic partial differential equation
  15. A novel conservative numerical approximation scheme for the Rosenau-Kawahara equation
  16. Fekete-Szegö functional for a class of non-Bazilevic functions related to quasi-subordination
  17. On local fractional integral inequalities via generalized ( h ˜ 1 , h ˜ 2 ) -preinvexity involving local fractional integral operators with Mittag-Leffler kernel
  18. On some geometric results for generalized k-Bessel functions
  19. Convergence analysis of M-iteration for 𝒢-nonexpansive mappings with directed graphs applicable in image deblurring and signal recovering problems
  20. Some results of homogeneous expansions for a class of biholomorphic mappings defined on a Reinhardt domain in ℂn
  21. Graded weakly 1-absorbing primary ideals
  22. The existence and uniqueness of solutions to a functional equation arising in psychological learning theory
  23. Some aspects of the n-ary orthogonal and b(αn,βn)-best approximations of b(αn,βn)-hypermetric spaces over Banach algebras
  24. Numerical solution of a malignant invasion model using some finite difference methods
  25. Increasing property and logarithmic convexity of functions involving Dirichlet lambda function
  26. Feature fusion-based text information mining method for natural scenes
  27. Global optimum solutions for a system of (k, ψ)-Hilfer fractional differential equations: Best proximity point approach
  28. The study of solutions for several systems of PDDEs with two complex variables
  29. Regularity criteria via horizontal component of velocity for the Boussinesq equations in anisotropic Lorentz spaces
  30. Generalized Stević-Sharma operators from the minimal Möbius invariant space into Bloch-type spaces
  31. On initial value problem for elliptic equation on the plane under Caputo derivative
  32. A dimension expanded preconditioning technique for block two-by-two linear equations
  33. Asymptotic behavior of Fréchet functional equation and some characterizations of inner product spaces
  34. Small perturbations of critical nonlocal equations with variable exponents
  35. Dynamical property of hyperspace on uniform space
  36. Some notes on graded weakly 1-absorbing primary ideals
  37. On the problem of detecting source points acting on a fluid
  38. Integral transforms involving a generalized k-Bessel function
  39. Ruled real hypersurfaces in the complex hyperbolic quadric
  40. On the monotonic properties and oscillatory behavior of solutions of neutral differential equations
  41. Approximate multi-variable bi-Jensen-type mappings
  42. Mixed-type SP-iteration for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in hyperbolic spaces
  43. On the equation fn + (f″)m ≡ 1
  44. Results on the modified degenerate Laplace-type integral associated with applications involving fractional kinetic equations
  45. Characterizations of entire solutions for the system of Fermat-type binomial and trinomial shift equations in ℂn#
  46. Commentary
  47. On I. Meghea and C. S. Stamin review article “Remarks on some variants of minimal point theorem and Ekeland variational principle with applications,” Demonstratio Mathematica 2022; 55: 354–379
  48. Special Issue on Fixed Point Theory and Applications to Various Differential/Integral Equations - Part II
  49. On Cauchy problem for pseudo-parabolic equation with Caputo-Fabrizio operator
  50. Fixed-point results for convex orbital operators
  51. Asymptotic stability of equilibria for difference equations via fixed points of enriched Prešić operators
  52. Asymptotic behavior of resolvents of equilibrium problems on complete geodesic spaces
  53. A system of additive functional equations in complex Banach algebras
  54. New inertial forward–backward algorithm for convex minimization with applications
  55. Uniqueness of solutions for a ψ-Hilfer fractional integral boundary value problem with the p-Laplacian operator
  56. Analysis of Cauchy problem with fractal-fractional differential operators
  57. Common best proximity points for a pair of mappings with certain dominating property
  58. Investigation of hybrid fractional q-integro-difference equations supplemented with nonlocal q-integral boundary conditions
  59. The structure of fuzzy fractals generated by an orbital fuzzy iterated function system
  60. On the structure of self-affine Jordan arcs in ℝ2
  61. Solvability for a system of Hadamard-type hybrid fractional differential inclusions
  62. Three solutions for discrete anisotropic Kirchhoff-type problems
  63. On split generalized equilibrium problem with multiple output sets and common fixed points problem
  64. Special Issue on Computational and Numerical Methods for Special Functions - Part II
  65. Sandwich-type results regarding Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of q-hypergeometric function
  66. Certain aspects of Nörlund -statistical convergence of sequences in neutrosophic normed spaces
  67. On completeness of weak eigenfunctions for multi-interval Sturm-Liouville equations with boundary-interface conditions
  68. Some identities on generalized harmonic numbers and generalized harmonic functions
  69. Study of degenerate derangement polynomials by λ-umbral calculus
  70. Normal ordering associated with λ-Stirling numbers in λ-shift algebra
  71. Analytical and numerical analysis of damped harmonic oscillator model with nonlocal operators
  72. Compositions of positive integers with 2s and 3s
  73. Kinematic-geometry of a line trajectory and the invariants of the axodes
  74. Hahn Laplace transform and its applications
  75. Discrete complementary exponential and sine integral functions
  76. Special Issue on Recent Methods in Approximation Theory - Part II
  77. On the order of approximation by modified summation-integral-type operators based on two parameters
  78. Bernstein-type operators on elliptic domain and their interpolation properties
  79. A class of strongly convergent subgradient extragradient methods for solving quasimonotone variational inequalities
  80. Special Issue on Recent Advances in Fractional Calculus and Nonlinear Fractional Evaluation Equations - Part II
  81. Application of fractional quantum calculus on coupled hybrid differential systems within the sequential Caputo fractional q-derivatives
  82. On some conformable boundary value problems in the setting of a new generalized conformable fractional derivative
  83. A certain class of fractional difference equations with damping: Oscillatory properties
  84. Weighted Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for r-times differentiable preinvex functions for k-fractional integrals
  85. Special Issue on Recent Advances for Computational and Mathematical Methods in Scientific Problems - Part II
  86. The behavior of hidden bifurcation in 2D scroll via saturated function series controlled by a coefficient harmonic linearization method
  87. Phase portraits of two classes of quadratic differential systems exhibiting as solutions two cubic algebraic curves
  88. Petri net analysis of a queueing inventory system with orbital search by the server
  89. Asymptotic stability of an epidemiological fractional reaction-diffusion model
  90. On the stability of a strongly stabilizing control for degenerate systems in Hilbert spaces
  91. Special Issue on Application of Fractional Calculus: Mathematical Modeling and Control - Part I
  92. New conticrete inequalities of the Hermite-Hadamard-Jensen-Mercer type in terms of generalized conformable fractional operators via majorization
  93. Pell-Lucas polynomials for numerical treatment of the nonlinear fractional-order Duffing equation
  94. Impacts of Brownian motion and fractional derivative on the solutions of the stochastic fractional Davey-Stewartson equations
  95. Some results on fractional Hahn difference boundary value problems
  96. Properties of a subclass of analytic functions defined by Riemann-Liouville fractional integral applied to convolution product of multiplier transformation and Ruscheweyh derivative
  97. Special Issue on Development of Fuzzy Sets and Their Extensions - Part I
  98. The cross-border e-commerce platform selection based on the probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy generalized dice similarity measures
  99. Comparison of fuzzy and crisp decision matrices: An evaluation on PROBID and sPROBID multi-criteria decision-making methods
  100. Rejection and symmetric difference of bipolar picture fuzzy graph
Downloaded on 25.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dema-2022-0208/html
Scroll to top button