Home Mathematics Application of fractional quantum calculus on coupled hybrid differential systems within the sequential Caputo fractional q-derivatives
Article Open Access

Application of fractional quantum calculus on coupled hybrid differential systems within the sequential Caputo fractional q-derivatives

  • Jehad Alzabut EMAIL logo , Mohamed Houas and Mohamed I. Abbas
Published/Copyright: March 21, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In the current manuscript, we combine the q-fractional integral operator and q-fractional derivative to investigate a coupled hybrid fractional q-differential systems with sequential fractional q-derivatives. The existence and uniqueness of solutions for the proposed system are established by means of Leray-Schauder’s alternative and the Banach contraction principle. Furthermore, the Ulam-Hyers and Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stability results are discussed. Finally, two illustrative examples are given to highlight the theoretical findings.

MSC 2010: 26A33; 34A08; 34A12

1 Introduction and preliminaries

In recent years, the fractional differential equations have been applied in various areas of engineering, mathematics, physics, and other applied sciences because of their ability to describe memory effects (see, e.g., [13]).

The discrete versions of continuous-type problems in science can be made from the point of view of the so-called q -calculus. The Caputo q -fractional derivative has been introduced on the base of the fractional q -integral and fractional q -derivative, always with the lower limit of integration equal to 0. However, in some considerations, such as solving q -differential equation of fractional order with initial values at a nonzero point, it is of interest to allow that the lower limit of integration is variable. Recently, many researchers got much interested in looking at fractional q -differential equations as new model equations for many physical problems. For example, some researchers obtained q -analogue of the integral and differential fractional operators properties, such as the q -Laplace transform, q -Taylor’s formula, and q -Mittage-Leffler function. For some fundamental results in the theory of fractional calculus and fractional differential equations, see, e.g., [49]. In addition, many scholars have paid much attention to the fractional quantum calculus, which has lots of applications in different areas of mathematics, such as combinatorics, number theory, basic hypergeometric functions, and other sciences. Recently, considerable attention has been given to the existence and stability of solutions for differential equations and systems with fractional quantum calculus. For more details, we refer the reader to the monographs [1012] and the references cited therein. Hybrid differential equations have been the object of many researchers, see [1315]. The hybrid differential equation of first order

d d t ξ ( ς ) ϕ ( ς , ξ ( ς ) ) = ψ ( ς , ξ ( ς ) ) , ς [ 0 , T ] , ξ ( ς 0 ) = ξ 0 R ,

was studied in [16] under the hypotheses that the functions ϕ C ( [ 0 , T ] × R , R \ { 0 } ) and ψ C ( [ 0 , T ] × R , R ) . The hybrid differential equations with fractional derivative have been addressed extensively by several researchers, for which the reader can consult [1720] and the references cited therein. On the other hand, several papers including the hybrid differential equations with fractional q-derivative have been raised, for example [2123] and the references therein. In [21], Ahmad and Ntouyas studied the existence of solutions for the fractional hybrid q-differential equation as follows:

D q δ C ξ ( ς ) ϕ ( ς , ξ ( ς ) ) = ψ ( ς , ξ ( ς ) ) , ς [ 0 , 1 ] , 1 < δ 2 , 0 < q < 1 , ξ ( 0 ) = 0 , ξ ( 1 ) = 0 ,

where D q δ C is the Caputo fractional q-derivative of order δ and the functions ϕ C ( [ 0 , 1 ] × R , R \ { 0 } ) , and ψ C ( [ 0 , 1 ] × R , R ) . In [22], the author studied the existence, uniqueness, and Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stability for a class of hybrid Caputo fractional q-differential pantograph equations described as follows:

D q δ C ξ ( ς ) i = 1 k ϕ i ( ς , ξ ( ς ) , ξ ( λ ς ) ) = i = 1 k φ i ς , ξ ( ς ) , ξ ( η ς ) , D q δ C ξ ( ς ) i = 1 k ϕ i ( ς , ξ ( ς ) , ξ ( λ ς ) ) , ξ ( 0 ) + ψ ( ξ ) = ξ 0 , ξ 0 R ,

where 0 < q , δ < 1 , 0 < λ , μ < 1 , D q δ C is the Caputo fractional q-derivative, ς [ 0 , T ] , ϕ i C ( J × R 2 , R { 0 } ) , and φ i C ( J × R 3 , R ) , i = 1 , , k , k N . Samei and Ranjbar [23] discussed the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the fractional hybrid q-differential inclusions with the boundary conditions of the form

D q δ C ξ ϕ ( ς , ξ ( ς ) , I q α 1 ξ ( ς ) , I q α 2 ξ ( ς ) , , I q α n ξ ( ς ) ) φ ( ς , ξ ( ς ) , I q γ 1 ξ ( ς ) , I q γ 2 ξ ( ς ) , , I q γ m ξ ( ς ) ) , ς [ 0 , 1 ] , ξ ( 0 ) = ξ 0 , ξ ( 1 ) = ξ 1 , ξ 0 , ξ 1 R ,

where 1 < δ 2 , q ( 0 , 1 ) , I q β denotes the Riemann-Liouville-type q-integral of order β > 0 , β { α i , γ j } , i = 1 , , n , j = 1 , , m , n , m N , D q δ C denotes Caputo-type q-derivative of order δ , ϕ : [ 0 , 1 ] × R n ( 0 , ) is continuous, and φ : [ 0 , 1 ] × R m P ( R ) is a multifunction. Recently, sequential hybrid fractional differential equations have also been studied by several scholars, see, e.g., [2427] and the references cited therein. In [24], the authors considered the fractional sequential type of the hybrid differential equation

D δ C D γ C ξ ( ς ) i = 1 k I γ i ϕ i ( ς , ξ ( ς ) ) ψ ( ς , ξ ( ς ) ) = φ ( ς , ξ ( ς ) , I α ξ ( ς ) ) , ς [ 0 , T ] , a ξ ( 0 ) ψ ( ς , ξ ( ς ) ) + b ξ ( ξ ) ψ ( ς , ξ ( ς ) ) = c , D γ C ξ ( 0 ) = 0 ,

where 0 < δ , γ 1 , 1 < δ + γ 2 , I β is the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order β > 0 , β { α , γ i } , ϕ i C ( [ 0 , T ] × R , R ) , i = 1 , 2 , , k , ψ C ( [ 0 , T ] × R , R \ { 0 } ) , and φ C ( [ 0 , T ] × R 2 , R ) and a , b , c are real constants with a + b 0 . The existence and uniqueness results were obtained by applying a generalization of Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem. In [25], the authors studied the existence, uniqueness, and stability analysis for a class of sequential hybrid fractional differential equations described as follows:

D δ C D γ C ξ ( ς ) i = 1 k I λ i ϕ i ( ς , ξ ( ς ) , D γ 1 C ξ ( ς ) ) ψ ( ς , ξ ( ς ) , D γ 1 C ξ ( ς ) ) = φ ( ς , ξ ( ς ) , I α ξ ( ς ) ) , ς [ 0 , 1 ] , D γ C ξ ( 0 ) = 0 , ξ ( 0 ) = g 1 ( ξ ( ε ) ) , ξ ( 1 ) = g 2 ( ξ ( ε ) ) ,

where 0 < δ 1 , 1 < γ 2 , 0 < ε < 1 , I β is the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order β > 0 , β { α , λ i } , the functions ψ : [ 0 , 1 ] × R 2 R \ { 0 } , ϕ i : [ 0 , 1 ] × R R , i = 1 , 2 , , k , and φ C ( [ 0 , 1 ] × R 2 , R ) satisfy the Carathéodory conditions, the boundary functions g 1 , g 2 : R R are non linear, and R represents the set of real numbers. To the best of our knowledge, there is no article discussing the coupled system of fractional hybrid q-differential equations in the literature. The objective of this article is to study the sequential coupled system of fractional hybrid q-differential equations of the following form:

(1) D q δ 1 C D q θ 1 C κ ( ς ) ϕ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) = ψ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) , ς [ 0 , 1 ] , D q δ 2 C D q θ 2 C ν ( ς ) ϕ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) = ψ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) , ς [ 0 , 1 ] , κ ( 0 ) = κ ( 1 ) = 0 , ν ( 0 ) = ν ( 1 ) = 0 , 0 < q < 1 , 0 < δ i , θ i 1 , i = 1 , 2 ,

where D q α C is the Caputo fractional q-derivative of order α , where α { δ i , θ i } , ϕ i : [ 0 , 1 ] × R 2 R { 0 } and ψ i : [ 0 , 1 ] × R 2 R , i = 1 , 2 are continuous functions. The operator D q α C is the fractional q-derivative in the sense of the Caputo, which is define as follows:

D q α C ν ( ς ) = I q n α D q n ν ( ς ) , α > 0 , D q 0 ν ( ς ) = ν ( ς ) ,

where n is the smallest integer greater than or equal to α . The fractional q-integral of the Riemann-Liouville-type [2830] is given as follows:

I q α ν ( ς ) = 1 Γ q ( α ) 0 ς ( ς q s ) ( α 1 ) ν ( s ) d q s , α > 0 , I q 0 ν ( ς ) = ν ( ς ) ,

where the q-gamma function is defined by Γ q ( α ) = ( 1 q ) ( α 1 ) ( 1 q ) α 1 , α R \ { 0 , 1 , 2 , } and satisfies

Γ q ( α + 1 ) = [ α ] q Γ q ( α ) , [ a ] q = 1 q a 1 q , a R .

We need the following essential lemmas.

Lemma 1

[31] For α , β 0 and the function ν defined in [ 0 , 1 ] , the following formulas hold:

I q α I q β ν ( ς ) = I q α + β ν ( ς ) and D q α I q α ν ( ς ) = ν ( ς ) .

Lemma 2

[31] Let α R + . Then, the following equality holds:

I q α D q α ν ( ς ) = ν ( ς ) j = 0 σ 1 ς j Γ q ( j + 1 ) D q j ν ( 0 ) .

Lemma 3

[31] For α R + and β > 1 , we have

I q α [ ( ς x ) ( β ) ] = Γ q ( β + 1 ) Γ q ( α + β + 1 ) ( ς x ) ( α + β ) .

Furthermore, the following auxiliary result is crucial.

Lemma 4

For i = 1 , 2 , let ϕ i C ( [ 0 , 1 ] × R 2 , R { 0 } ) and φ i C ( [ 0 , 1 ] , R ) . Then, the solution of the problem

(2) D q δ 1 C D q θ 1 C κ ( ς ) ϕ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) = φ 1 ( ς ) , ς [ 0 , 1 ] D q δ 2 C D q θ 2 C κ ( ς ) ϕ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) = φ 2 ( ς ) , ς [ 0 , 1 ] , κ ( 0 ) = κ ( 1 ) = 0 , ν ( 0 ) = ν ( 1 ) = 0 , 0 < q < 1 , 0 < δ i , θ i < 1 , i = 1 , 2 ,

is given as follows:

(3) κ ( ς ) = ϕ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 ) 0 ς ( ς q s ) ( δ 1 + θ 1 1 ) φ 1 ( s ) d q s ϕ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) ς θ 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 q s ) ( δ 1 + θ 1 1 ) φ 1 ( s ) d q s

and

(4) ν ( ς ) = ϕ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 ) 0 ς ( ς q s ) ( δ 2 + θ 2 1 ) φ 2 ( s ) d q s ϕ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) ς θ 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 ) 0 1 ( 1 q s ) ( δ 2 + θ 2 1 ) φ 2 ( s ) d q s .

Proof

Applying the Riemann-Liouville fractional q-integral operators I q δ 1 and I q δ 2 on both sides of equations in (2) and using Lemma 2, we obtain

(5) D q θ 1 C κ ( ς ) ϕ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) = I q δ 1 φ 1 ( ς ) + c 1 , D q θ 2 C κ ( ς ) ϕ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) = I q δ 2 φ 2 ( t ) + d 1 ,

where c 1 , d 1 R . Next, applying the Riemann-Liouville fractional q-integral operator I q θ 1 and I q θ 2 on both sides and using Lemma 2, we obtain

(6) κ ( ς ) = ϕ 1 ( ς , κ ( τ ) , ν ( ς ) ) I q δ 1 + θ 1 φ 1 ( ς ) + c 1 Γ q ( θ 1 + 1 ) ς θ 1 + c 2 ,

(7) ν ( ς ) = ϕ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) I q δ 2 + θ 2 φ 2 ( ς ) + d 1 Γ q ( θ 2 + 1 ) ς θ 2 + d 2 ,

where c 2 , d 2 R . Now, using the conditions κ ( 0 ) = κ ( 1 ) = 0 and ν ( 0 ) = ν ( 1 ) = 0 , we can obtain

(8) c 1 = Γ q ( θ 1 + 1 ) I q δ 1 + θ 1 φ 1 ( 1 ) , c 2 = 0 , d 1 = Γ q ( θ 2 + 1 ) I q δ 2 + θ 2 φ 2 ( 1 ) , d 2 = 0 .

Substituting the values of c i , d i , i = 1 , 2 in (6) and (7), we obtain (3) and (4).

Conversely, applying the operators D q θ 1 C and D q θ 2 C on (3) and (4), respectively, it follows that

(9) D q θ 1 C κ ( ς ) ϕ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) = I q δ 1 φ 1 ( ς ) Γ q ( θ 1 + 1 ) Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 1 ) I q δ 1 + θ 1 φ 1 ( 1 ) , D q θ 2 C ν ( ς ) ϕ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) = I q δ 2 φ 2 ( ς ) Γ q ( θ 2 + 1 ) Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 ) I q δ 2 + θ 2 φ 2 ( 1 ) .

Next, applying the operators D q δ 1 C and D q δ 2 C , we obtain

(10) D q δ 1 C D q θ 1 C κ ( ς ) ϕ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) = φ 1 ( ς ) , D q δ 2 C D q θ 2 C ν ( ς ) ϕ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) = φ 2 ( ς ) .

From (3) and (4), it is easy to verify that the boundary conditions κ ( 0 ) = κ ( 1 ) = 0 and ν ( 0 ) = ν ( 1 ) = 0 are satisfied. This establishes the equivalence between (2) and (3)–(4). This completes the proof.□

The rest of the article is organized as follows. In Section 2, we establish sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the main system. The stability of solutions is discussed in Section 4. We present numerical examples to illustrate and validate the effectiveness of the main results in Section 5.

2 Existence and uniqueness results

Theorem 5

Let us now define the space

W × Z = { ( κ , ν ) : κ , ν C ( [ 0 , 1 ] , R ) } ,

endowed with the norm ( κ , ν ) W × Z = κ + ν , where

κ = sup { κ ( ς ) : ς [ 0 , 1 ] } and ν = sup { ν ( ς ) : ς [ 0 , 1 ] } .

It is clear that ( W × Z , . W × Z ) is a Banach space.

In view of Lemma 4, we can define operator T : W × Z W × Z as follows:

(11) T ( κ , ν ) ( ς ) = ( T 1 ( κ , ν ) ( ς ) , T 2 ( κ , ν ) ( ς ) ) ,

where

(12) T 1 ( κ , ν ) ( ς ) = ϕ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 ) 0 ς ( ς q s ) ( δ 1 + θ 1 1 ) ψ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) d q s ϕ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) ς θ 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 q s ) ( δ 1 + θ 1 1 ) ψ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) d q s

and

(13) T 2 ( κ , ν ) ( ς ) = ϕ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 ) 0 ς ( ς q s ) ( δ 2 + θ 2 1 ) ψ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) d q s ϕ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) ς θ 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 ) 0 1 ( 1 q s ) ( δ 2 + θ 2 1 ) ψ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) d q s .

We impose the following hypotheses:

  1. ψ i : [ 0 , 1 ] × R 2 R are continuous functions and there exist constants η i > 0 such that for all ς J and κ i , ν i R , i = 1 , 2 ,

    ψ 1 ( ς , κ 1 , ν 1 ) ψ 1 ( ς , κ 2 , ν 2 ) η 1 ( κ 1 κ 2 + ν 1 ν 2 ) , ψ 2 ( ς , κ 1 , ν 1 ) ψ 2 ( ς , κ 2 , ν 2 ) η 2 ( κ 1 κ 2 + ν 1 ν 2 ) .

  2. ϕ i : [ 0 , 1 ] × R 2 R { 0 } are continuous functions and there exist positive constants Λ i , i = 1 , 2 , such that for all ς J and κ , ν R ,

    ϕ 1 ( ς , κ , ν ) Λ 1 , ϕ 2 ( ς , κ , ν ) Λ 2 .

In the following, we present the existence and uniqueness of solutions of problem (1) using Banach’s fixed point theorem.

Theorem 6

Assume that ( H 1 ) and ( H 2 ) hold and that

(14) Λ 1 η 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) < 1 4 , Λ 2 η 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) < 1 4 ,

where M i sup ς [ 0 , 1 ] ψ i ( ς , 0 , 0 ) < , i = 1 , 2 . Then, the problem (1) has a unique solution on [ 0 , 1 ] .

Proof

Define the set B σ = { ( κ , ν ) W × Z : ( κ , ν ) W × Z < σ } , where σ R satisfies the following inequality:

max 2 Λ 1 M 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) 1 4 Λ 1 η 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) , 2 Λ 2 M 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) 1 4 Λ 2 η 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) σ .

We first show that T B σ B σ . For all ς J and ( κ , ν ) B σ , we have

(15) ψ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) ψ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) ψ 1 ( ς , 0 , 0 ) + ψ 1 ( ς , 0 , 0 ) η 1 ( κ ( ς ) + ν ( ς ) ) + M 1 η 1 ( κ + ν ) + M 1 η 1 σ + M 1

and

(16) ψ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) ψ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) ψ 2 ( ς , 0 , 0 ) + ψ 2 ( ς , 0 , 0 ) η 2 ( κ ( ς ) + ν ( ς ) ) + M 2 η 2 ( κ + ν ) + M 2 η 2 σ + M 2 .

By (15), we obtain

(17) T 1 ( κ , ν ) ( ς ) Λ 1 sup ς [ 0 , 1 ] 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 ) 0 ς ( ς q s ) ( δ 1 + θ 1 1 ) ψ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) d q s + ς θ 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 q s ) ( δ 1 + θ 1 1 ) ψ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) d q s 2 Λ 1 η 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) σ + 2 Λ 1 M 1 Γ q ( α + β + 1 ) ,

which implies that

(18) T 1 ( κ , ν ) 2 Λ 1 η 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) σ + 2 Λ 1 M 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) σ 2 .

Now, using (16), we obtain

(19) T 2 ( κ , ν ) 2 Λ 2 η 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) σ + 2 Λ 2 M 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) σ 2 .

Consequently, we obtain

(20) T ( κ , ν ) W × Z = T 1 ( κ , ν ) + T 2 ( κ , ν ) 2 Λ 1 η 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) + Λ 2 η 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) σ + 2 Λ 1 M 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) + 2 Λ 2 M 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) σ ,

which implies that T B σ B σ .

For ( κ i , ν i ) W × Z , i = 1 , 2 , and for each ς [ 0 , 1 ] , we have

(21) T 1 ( κ 1 , ν 1 ) ( ς ) T 1 ( κ 2 , ν 2 ) ( ς ) M 1 sup ς [ 0 , 1 ] 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 ) 0 ς ( ς q s ) ( δ 1 + θ 1 1 ) ψ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) ψ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) d q s + ς θ 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 q s ) ( δ 1 + θ 1 1 ) 0 1 ( 1 s ) α + β 1 ψ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) ψ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) d q s .

Thanks to ( H 1 ) , we can write

(22) T 1 ( κ 1 , ν 1 ) T 1 ( κ 2 , ν 2 ) 2 Λ 1 η 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) κ 1 ν 2 , ν 1 ν 2 W × Z .

Analogously, we can obtain

(23) T 2 ( κ 1 , ν 1 ) T 2 ( κ 2 , ν 2 ) 2 Λ 2 η 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) κ 1 κ 2 , ν 1 ν 2 W × Z .

From the definition of ( . ) W × Z , we have

(24) T 1 ( κ 1 , ν 1 ) T 1 ( κ 2 , ν 2 ) W × Z = T 1 ( κ 1 , ν 1 ) T 1 ( κ 2 , ν 2 ) + T 2 ( κ 1 , ν 1 ) T 2 ( κ 2 , ν 2 ) 2 Λ 1 η 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) + 2 Λ 2 η 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) κ 1 κ 2 , ν 1 ν 2 W × Z .

Thanks to (14), we conclude that T is a contraction mapping. Hence, by Banach fixed point theorem, there exists a unique fixed point, which is a solution of system (1). This completes the proof.□

Now, we prove the existence of solutions of problem (1) by applying the Leray-Schauder nonlinear alternative.

Lemma 7

[33] (Leray-Schauder alternative). Let F : E E be a completely continuous operator (i.e., a map that is restricted to any bounded set in E is compact). Let

Θ ( F ) = { u E : u = λ F ( u ) for s o m e 0 < λ < 1 } .

Then, either the set Θ ( F ) is unbounded or F has at least one fixed point.

For the forthcoming result, we suppose that

  1. ψ i : [ 0 , 1 ] × R 2 R are continuous functions and there exist constants ϑ i , μ i 0 , i = 1 , 2 , and ϑ 0 > 0 , μ 0 > 0 such that for all ς J and κ , ν R , we have:

    ψ 1 ( ς , κ , ν ) ϑ 0 + ϑ 1 κ + ϑ 2 ν

    and

    ψ 2 ( ς , κ , ν ) μ 0 + μ 1 κ + μ 2 ν .

Theorem 8

Assume that hypotheses ( H 2 ) and ( H 3 ) are satisfied. Furthermore, assume that

(25) Λ 1 ϑ 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) + Λ 2 μ 1 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) < 1 2 , Λ 1 ϑ 2 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) + Λ 2 μ 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) < 1 2 .

Then, system (1) has at least one solution on [ 0 , 1 ] .

Proof

In the first step, we show that the operator T : W × Z W × Z is completely continuous. By continuity of the functions ϕ i , ψ i , i = 1 , 2 , it follows that the operator T is continuous.

Let Ω W × Z be bounded. Then, we can find positive constants A and B such that

ψ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) A , ψ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) B , for all ( κ , ν ) Ω .

Then, for any ( κ , ν ) Ω , we have

(26) T 1 ( κ , ν ) Λ 1 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 ) 0 ς ( ς q s ) ( δ 1 + θ 1 1 ) ψ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) d q s + ς θ 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 ) 0 ς ( ς q s ) ( δ 1 + θ 1 1 ) ψ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) d q s 2 Λ 1 A Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) ,

which yields

(27) T 1 ( κ , ν ) 2 Λ 1 A Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) < + .

We also have

(28) T 2 ( κ , ν ) 2 Λ 2 B Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) < + .

It follows from (27) and (28) that

(29) T ( κ , ν ) W × Z 2 Λ 1 A Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) + 2 Λ 2 B Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) .

Thus,

T ( w , z ) W × Z < + .

Next, we show that T is equicontinuous. For all 0 ς 2 < ς 1 1 , we have

(30) T 1 ( κ , ν ) ( ς 1 ) T 1 ( κ , ν ) ( ς 2 ) Λ 1 A [ ( ς 1 ς 2 ) ( δ 1 + θ 1 ) + ς 1 ( δ 1 + θ 1 ) ς 2 ( δ 1 + θ 1 ) ] Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) + ς 1 θ 1 ς 2 θ 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 )

and

(31) T 2 ( κ , ν ) ( ς 1 ) T 2 ( κ , ν ) ( ς 2 ) Λ 2 B [ ( ς 1 ς 2 ) ( δ 2 + θ 2 ) + ς 1 ( δ 2 + θ 2 ) ς 2 ( δ 2 + θ 2 ) ] Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) + ς 1 θ 2 ς 2 θ 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) .

Thanks to (30) and (31), we can state that T ( κ , ν ) ( ς 1 ) T ( κ , ν ) ( ς 2 ) W × Z 0 as ς 2 ς 1 . Thus, by using the Arzela-Ascoli theorem, one can conclude that the operator T : W × Z W × Z is completely continuous.

Finally, it will be verified that the set Σ = { ( κ , ν ) W × Z , ( κ , ν ) = ε T ( κ , ν ) , 0 < ε < 1 } is bounded. Let ( κ , ν ) Σ . Then, for each ς [ 0 , 1 ] , we can write

κ ( ς ) = ε T 1 ( κ , ν ) ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) = ε T 2 ( κ , ν ) ( ς ) .

Then,

(32) κ ( ς ) 2 Λ 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) ( ϑ 0 + ϑ 1 κ ( ς ) + ϑ 2 ν ( ς ) )

and

(33) ν ( ς ) 2 Λ 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) ( μ 0 + μ 1 κ ( ς ) + μ 2 ν ( ς ) ) .

Hence, we have

(34) κ 2 Λ 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) ( ϑ 0 + ϑ 1 κ + ϑ 2 ν )

and

(35) ν 2 Λ 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) ( μ 0 + μ 1 κ + μ 2 ν ) ,

which imply that

(36) κ + ν 2 Λ 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) ϑ 0 + 2 Λ 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) μ 0 + 2 Λ 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) ϑ 1 + 2 Λ 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) μ 1 κ + 2 Λ 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) ϑ 2 + 2 Λ 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) μ 2 ν .

Consequently,

(37) ( κ , ν ) W × Z 2 Λ 1 ϑ 0 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) + 2 Λ 2 μ 0 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) Π

for all ς [ 0 , 1 ] , where

Π min 1 2 Λ 1 ϑ 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) + 2 Λ 2 μ 1 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) , 1 2 Λ 1 ϑ 2 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) + 2 Λ 2 μ 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) .

This shows that the set Σ is bounded. Hence, all the conditions of Lemma 6 are satisfied, and consequently, the operator has at least one fixed point, which corresponds to a solution of the system (1). This completes the proof.□

3 Ulam-Hyers-Rassias-stability results

In the following section, we consider Ulam’s-type stability of the q-fractional problem (1). For ς [ 0 , 1 ] , we provide the following inequalities:

(38) D q δ 1 C D q θ 1 C κ 1 ( ς ) ϕ 1 ( ς , κ 1 ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ) ψ 1 ( ς , κ 1 ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ) λ 1 , D q δ 2 C D q θ 2 C ν 1 ( ς ) ϕ 2 ( ς , κ 1 ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ) ψ 2 ( ς , κ 1 ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ) λ 2 ,

and

(39) D q δ 1 C D q θ 1 C κ 1 ( ς ) ϕ 1 ( ς , κ 1 ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ) ψ 1 ( ς , κ 1 ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ) λ 1 h 1 ( ς ) , D q δ 2 C D q θ 2 C ν 1 ( ς ) ϕ 2 ( ς , κ 1 ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ) ψ 2 ( ς , κ 1 ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ) λ 2 h 2 ( ς ) ,

where λ i are positive real numbers and h i : [ 0 , 1 ] R + , i = 1 , 2 are continuous functions.

Definition 9

System (1) is Ulam-Hyers stable if there exists a real number ϖ ψ 1 , ψ 2 = ( ϖ ψ 1 , ϖ ψ 2 ) > 0 such that for each λ = ( λ 1 , λ 2 ) > 0 and for each solution ( κ 1 , ν 1 ) W × Z of the inequality (38), there exists a solution ( κ , ν ) W × Z of the problem (1) with

κ 1 ( ς ) κ ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ν ( ς ) ϖ ψ 1 ψ 2 λ , ς [ 0 , 1 ] .

Definition 10

System (1) is Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stable with respect to h = ( h 2 , h 2 ) C ( [ 0 , 1 ] , R ) if there exists a real number ϖ ψ 1 , ψ 2 , h = ( ϖ ψ 1 , h , ϖ ψ 2 , h ) > 0 such that for each λ = ( λ 1 , λ 2 ) > 0 and for each solution ( κ 1 , ν 1 ) W × Z of the inequality (39), there exists a solution ( κ , ν ) W × Z of the problem (1) with

κ 1 ( ς ) κ ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ν ( ς ) ϖ ψ 1 ψ 2 , h λ h ( ς ) , ς [ 0 , 1 ] .

Theorem 11

Assume that ( H 1 ) and ( H 2 ) hold. If

(40) Λ 1 η 1 < Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) and Λ 2 η 2 < Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) ,

then the problem (1) is Ulam-Hyers stable.

Proof

Let ( κ 1 , ν 1 ) W × Z is a solution of the inequality (38) and let ( κ , ν ) W × Z be the unique solution of the problem

D q δ 1 C D q θ 1 C κ ( ς ) ϕ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) = ψ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) , ς [ 0 , 1 ] , κ 1 ( 0 ) = κ 2 ( 0 ) , κ 1 ( 1 ) = κ 2 ( 1 ) , D q δ 2 C D q θ 2 C ν ( ς ) ϕ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) = ψ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) , ς [ 0 , 1 ] , ν 1 ( 0 ) = ν 2 ( 0 ) , ν 1 ( 1 ) = ν 2 ( 1 ) .

By Lemma 7, we have

κ ( ς ) = ϕ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) I q δ 1 + θ 1 φ 1 κ ( ς ) + c 1 Γ q ( θ 1 + 1 ) ς θ 1 + c 2 , ν ( ς ) = ϕ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) I q δ 2 + θ 2 φ 2 ν ( ς ) + d 1 Γ q ( θ 2 + 1 ) ς θ 2 + d 2 ,

where

φ 1 κ ( ς ) = ψ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) , φ 2 ν ( ς ) = ψ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) , ς [ 0 , 1 ] .

By integration of the (40), we obtain

(41) κ 1 ( ς ) ϕ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) I q δ 1 + θ 1 φ 1 κ ( ς ) + c 3 Γ q ( θ 1 + 1 ) ς θ 1 + c 4 λ ς δ 1 + θ 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) λ Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) ,

and

(42) ν 1 ( ς ) ϕ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) I q δ 2 + θ 2 φ 2 ν ( ς ) + d 3 Γ q ( θ 2 + 1 ) ς θ 2 + d 4 λ ς δ 2 + θ 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) λ Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) .

From hypotheses ( H 1 ) and ( H 2 ) , we have

(43) κ 1 ( ς ) κ ( ς ) κ 1 ( ς ) ϕ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) I q δ 1 + θ 1 φ 1 κ ( ς ) + c 3 Γ q ( θ 1 + 1 ) ς θ 1 + c 4 + ϕ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) I q δ 1 + θ 1 φ 1 κ 1 ( ς ) φ 1 κ ( ς ) λ Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) + Λ 1 η 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) ( κ 1 ( ς ) κ ( ς ) + ν 1 ( ς ) ν ( ς ) ) ,

which implies that

(44) κ 1 ( ς ) κ ( ς ) λ 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) + Λ 1 η 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) ( κ 1 ( ς ) κ ( ς ) + ν 1 ( ς ) ν ( ς ) ) .

In addition, we have

(45) ν 1 ( ς ) ν ( ς ) λ 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) + Λ 2 η 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) ( κ 1 ( ς ) κ ( ς ) + ν 1 ( ς ) ν ( ς ) ) .

Thus,

(46) ( κ 1 ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ) ( κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) = κ 1 ( ς ) κ ( ς ) + ν 1 ( ς ) ν ( ς ) 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) + 1 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) min 1 Λ 1 η 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) , 1 Λ 2 η 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) λ ϖ ψ 1 ψ 2 λ ,

where λ = max { λ 1 , λ 2 } . Hence, problem (1) is Ulam-Hyers stable.□

Theorem 12

Assume that ( H 1 ) , ( H 2 ) , and (39) hold. Suppose there exist γ h i > 0 , i = 1 , 2 , such that

(47) I q δ i + θ i h i ( t ) γ h i h i ( t ) , t [ 0 , 1 ] , i = 1 , 2 ,

where h C ( [ 0 , 1 ] , R + ) , i = 1 , 2 , are nondecreasing. Then, system (1) is Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stable.

Proof

Let ( κ 1 , ν 1 ) W × Z is a solution of the inequality (39) and let us assume that ( κ , ν ) W × Z is a solution of system (1). Thus, we have

κ ( ς ) = ϕ 1 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) I q δ 1 + θ 1 φ 1 κ ( ς ) + c 1 Γ q ( θ 1 + 1 ) ς θ 1 + c 2 , ν ( ς ) = ϕ 2 ( ς , κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) I q δ 2 + θ 2 φ 2 ν ( ς ) + d 1 Γ q ( θ 2 + 1 ) ς θ 2 + d 2 .

From inequality (41), we have

(48) κ 1 ( ς ) ϕ 1 ( ς , κ 1 ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ) I q δ 1 + θ 1 φ 1 κ 1 ( ς ) + c 3 Γ q ( θ 1 + 1 ) ς θ 1 + c 4 λ I q δ 1 + θ 1 h ( ς ) λ γ h 1 h ( ς ) , ς [ 0 , 1 ]

and

(49) ν 1 ( ς ) ϕ 2 ( ς , κ 1 ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ) I q δ 2 + θ 2 φ 2 ν 1 ( ς ) + d 3 Γ q ( θ 2 + 1 ) ς θ 2 + d 4 λ 1 I q δ 2 + θ 2 h 1 ( ς ) λ 1 γ h 1 h 1 ( ς ) , ς [ 0 , 1 ] .

Now, using ( H 1 ) and ( H 2 ) , we can write

(50) κ 1 ( ς ) κ ( ς ) κ 1 ( ς ) ϕ 1 ( ς , κ 1 ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ) I q δ 1 + θ 1 φ 1 κ 1 ( ς ) + c 3 Γ q ( θ 1 + 1 ) ς θ 1 + c 4 + ϕ 1 ( ς , κ 1 ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ) I q δ 1 + θ 1 φ 1 κ 1 ( ς ) φ 1 κ ( ς ) λ 1 ϑ γ 1 h 1 ( t ) + Λ 1 η 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) ( κ 1 ( ς ) κ ( ς ) + ν 1 ( ς ) ν ( ς ) ) ,

which implies that

(51) κ 1 ( t ) κ ( t ) λ 1 ϑ γ 1 h 1 ( t ) + Λ 1 η 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) ( κ 1 ( ς ) κ ( ς ) + ν 1 ( ς ) ν ( ς ) ) .

On the other hand,

(52) ν 1 ( ς ) ν ( ς ) λ 2 ϑ γ 2 h 2 ( t ) + Λ 2 η 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) ( κ 1 ( ς ) κ ( ς ) + ν 1 ( ς ) ν ( ς ) ) .

Thanks to (51) and (52), we obtain

(53) ( κ 1 ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ) ( κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) = κ 1 ( ς ) κ ( ς ) + ν 1 ( ς ) ν ( ς ) , γ h 1 + γ h 2 min 1 Λ 1 η 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) , 1 Λ 2 η 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) λ h ( ς ) ϖ ψ 1 ψ 2 , h λ h ( ς ) .

Thus, system (1) is Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stable.□

4 Examples

Example 13

Consider the following system of hybrid q-fractional differential equations:

(54) D 1 4 3 4 C D 1 4 1 2 C κ ( ς ) cos ( κ ( ς ) + ν ( ς ) ) + 1 31 = 1 60 sin 2 κ ( ς ) ν ( ς ) 15 ( t + 2 ) ( ν ( ς ) + 1 ) + 2 ς + 1 3 , ς [ 0 , 1 ] , D 1 4 2 3 C D 1 4 5 6 C ν ( ς ) sin κ ( ς ) + cos ν ( ς ) + 1 37 = 1 2 ( ς + 4 ) 2 κ ( ς ) ( κ ( ς ) + 1 ) + cos ν ( ς ) 32 e ς + 1 + ς + 1 2 , ς [ 0 , 1 ] , κ ( 0 ) = κ ( 1 ) = 0 , ν ( 0 ) = ν ( 1 ) = 0 .

and the following 1 4 -fractional inequalities:

D 1 4 3 4 C D 1 4 1 2 C κ ( ς ) cos ( κ ( ς ) + ν ( ς ) ) + 1 31 1 60 sin 2 κ ( ς ) ν ( ς ) 15 ( ς + 2 ) ( ν ( ς ) + 1 ) 2 ς + 1 3 λ , D 1 4 2 3 C D 1 4 5 6 C ν ( ς ) sin κ ( ς ) + cos ν ( ς ) + 1 37 = 1 2 ( ς + 4 ) 2 κ ( ς ) ( κ ( ς ) + 1 ) cos ν ( ς ) 32 e ς + 1 ς + 1 2 λ ,

and

D 1 4 3 4 C D 1 4 1 2 C κ ( ς ) cos ( κ ( ς ) + ν ( ς ) ) + 1 31 1 60 sin 2 κ ( ς ) ν ( ς ) 15 ( ς + 2 ) ( ν ( ς ) + 1 ) 2 ς + 1 3 λ h ( ς ) , D 1 4 2 3 C D 1 4 5 6 C ν ( ς ) sin κ ( ς ) + cos ν ( ς ) + 1 37 = 1 2 ( ς + 4 ) 2 κ ( ς ) ( κ ( ς ) + 1 ) cos ν ( ς ) 32 e ς + 1 ς + 1 2 λ h ( ς ) .

Here, δ 1 = 3 4 , θ 1 = 1 2 , δ 2 = 2 3 , θ 2 = 5 6 , q = 1 4 , and

ψ 1 ( ς , κ , ν ) = 1 60 sin 2 κ ( ς ) + ν ( ς ) 15 ( ς + 2 ) ( ν ( ς ) + 1 ) + 2 ς + 1 3 , ψ 2 ( ς , κ , ν ) = 1 2 ( ς + 4 ) 2 κ ( ς ) ( κ ( ς ) + 1 ) + cos ν ( ς ) 32 e ς + 1 + ς + 1 2 , ϕ 1 ( ς , κ , ν ) = cos ( κ ( ς ) + ν ( ς ) ) + 1 31 , ϕ 2 ( ς , κ , ν ) = sin κ ( ς ) + cos ν ( ς ) + 1 37 .

For ( w i , z i ) R 2 , i = 1 , 2 , and t [ 0 , 1 ] , we have

ψ 1 ( ς , κ 1 , ν 1 ) ψ 1 ( ς , κ 2 , ν 2 ) 1 30 ( κ 1 κ 2 + ν 1 ν 2 ) , ψ 2 ( ς , κ 1 , ν 1 ) ψ 2 ( ς , κ 2 , ν 2 ) 1 32 ( κ 1 κ 2 + ν 1 v 2 ) ,

and

φ 1 ( ς , κ , ν ) 2 31 , φ 2 ( ς , κ , ν ) 3 37 .

Hence, condition ( H 1 ) is satisfied with η 1 = 1 30 and η 2 = 1 32 , respectively, and condition ( H 2 ) is satisfied with Λ 1 = 2 31 and Λ 2 = 3 37 , respectively.

Thus, conditions

Λ 1 η 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) = 4.8957 × 1 0 3 < 1 4 , Λ 2 η 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) = 4.9873 × 1 0 3 < 1 4

are satisfied. It follows from Theorem 5 that system (54) has a unique solution and is Ulam-Hyers stable with

( κ 1 ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ) ( κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) 9.9378 × 1 0 3 λ .

Let h 1 ( ς ) = h 2 ( ς ) = ς 2 , then

I 1 4 3 4 + 1 2 h 1 ( ς ) = I 1 4 3 4 + 1 2 ( ς 2 ) 2 Γ 1 4 17 4 ς 2 = υ h 1 h 1 ( ς )

and

I 1 4 2 3 + 5 6 h 2 ( ς ) = I 1 4 2 3 + 5 6 ( ς 2 ) 2 Γ 1 4 9 2 ς 2 = υ h 2 h 2 ( ς ) .

Thus, condition (47) is satisfied with h ( ς ) = ς 2 and γ h 1 = 2 Γ 0.25 17 4 , γ h 2 = 2 Γ 0.25 9 2 . It follows from Theorem 12 that problem (54) is Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stable with

( κ 1 ( ς ) , ν 1 ( ς ) ) ( κ ( ς ) , ν ( ς ) ) 7.34 λ h ( ς ) , ς [ 0 , 1 ] .

Example 14

Consider the following hybrid fractional e 5 -differential system:

(55) D e 5 ln 3 3 C D e 5 5 4 C κ ( ς ) cos ( κ ( ς ) + ν ( ς ) ) + 1 31 = 1 + e ς 16 ln 2 + ς 2 × e 2 ς cos κ ( ς ) 15 ( ς + 4 ) + e ς ν ( ς ) 25 80 + ς 2 , ς [ 0 , 1 ] , D e 5 1 3 C D e 5 e 5 C ν ( ς ) sin κ ( ς ) + cos ν ( ς ) + 1 37 = sin ς 32 + ς 2 × κ ( ς ) 5 e ( ς + 4 ) 2 + sin ν ( ς ) 35 e 2 1 + ς , ς [ 0 , 1 ] , κ ( 0 ) = κ ( 1 ) = 0 , ν ( 0 ) = ν ( 1 ) = 0 .

For this example, we have δ 1 = ln 3 3 , θ 1 = 5 4 , δ 2 = 1 2 , θ 2 = e 5 , q = e 5 , and

ψ 1 ( ς , κ , ν ) = 1 + e ς 16 ln 2 + ς 2 + e 2 ς cos κ 15 ( ς + 4 ) + e ς ν 3 80 + ς 2 , ψ 2 ( ς , κ , ν ) = sin ς 32 + ς 2 + κ 5 e ( ς + 4 ) 2 + sin ν 35 e 2 1 + ς

It is easy to find that

ψ 1 ( ς , κ , ν ) 1 8 ln 2 + 1 60 κ + 1 120 ν , ψ 2 ( ς , κ , ν ) 1 16 + 1 80 e κ + 1 35 e 2 ν , φ 1 ( ς , κ , ν ) 2 31 , φ 2 ( ς , κ , ν ) 3 37 ,

which implies ϑ 0 = 1 8 ln 2 , ϑ 1 = 1 60 , ϑ 2 = 1 120 , μ 0 = 1 16 , μ 1 = 1 80 e , μ 2 = 1 35 e 2 , Λ 1 = 2 31 , and Λ 2 = 3 37 . Therefore, we obtain

Λ 1 ϑ 1 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) + Λ 2 μ 1 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) = 1.4605 × 1 0 3 < 1 2

and

Λ 1 ϑ 2 Γ q ( δ 1 + θ 1 + 1 ) + Λ 2 μ 2 Γ q ( δ 2 + θ 2 + 1 ) = 8.5619 × 1 0 4 < 1 2 .

Thus, all the conditions of Theorem 8 are satisfied, and problem (55) has at least one solution on [ 0 , 1 ] .

5 Conclusion

In this study, we considered acoupled hybrid fractional q-differential systems involving two sequential Caputo fractional q-derivatives. The uniqueness, existence, and Ulam stability of the solutions have been discussed. The existence and uniqueness of solutions for the mentioned problem is established by applying contraction mapping principles. By the aid of the Leray-Schauder alternative the existence of at least one solution is established. Furthermore, the Ulam-Hyers stability and Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stability results are obtained. Finally, a simulative examples are proposed in order to enlighten the theoretical results. Since, in this field of interest, it is important to increase ability of scholars for investigating differential equations with fractional quantum calculus and trying to find applicability of the studied problems in real word phenomena, in this work we have discussed a coupled hybrid fractional q -differential systems with two sequential Caputo fractional q-derivatives. However, for future developments, we think that it will be more suitable to discuss the above q-fractional problem by considering n -sequential Caputo q-derivatives. For further consideration in the future, we will continue to study the Ulam-Hyers-Mittag-Leffler stability for the above proposed system by using Henry-Gronwall inequality.



Acknowledgement

Alzabut expresses his sincere thanks to the Prince Sultan University and the OSTİM Technical University for supporting this research.

  1. Author contributions: All authors contributed equally and significantly to this article. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  2. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

[1] K. Shah, M. Arfan, A. Ullah, Q. Al-Mdallal, K. J. Ansari, and T. Abdeljawad, Computational study on the dynamics of fractional order differential equations with applications, Chaos Solitons Fractals 157 (2022), 111955. 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111955Search in Google Scholar

[2] K. Shah, T. Abdeljawad, B. Abdalla, and M. S. Abualrub, Utilizing fixed point approach to investigate piecewise equations with non-singular type derivative, Aims Math. 7 (2022), no. 8, 14595–14613. 10.3934/math.2022804Search in Google Scholar

[3] V. E. Tarasov, Fractional Dynamics: Application of Fractional Calculus to Dynamics of Particles, Fields and Media, Springer, Heidelberg; Higher Education Press, Beijing, 2010. 10.1007/978-3-642-14003-7Search in Google Scholar

[4] P. Agarwal and J. Choi, Fractional calculus operators and their image formulas, J. Korean Math. Soc. 53 (2016), no. 5, 1183–1210. 10.4134/JKMS.j150458Search in Google Scholar

[5] P. Agarwal, M. Jleli, and M. Tomar, Certain Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities via generalized k-fractional integrals, J. Inequal. Appl. 55 (2017), 1–10. 10.1186/s13660-017-1318-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] P. Agarwal, Some inequalities involving Hadamard-type k-fractional integral operators, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 40 (2017), no. 11, 3882–3891. 10.1002/mma.4270Search in Google Scholar

[7] Y. M. Chu, N. A. Shah, P. Agarwal, and J. D. Chung, Analysis of fractional multi-dimensional Navier-Stokes equation, Adv. Difference Equ. 91 (2021), 1–18. 10.1186/s13662-021-03250-xSearch in Google Scholar

[8] V. F. Morales-Delgado, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, K. M. Saad, M. AltafKhan, and P. Agarwal, Analytic solution for oxygen diffusion from capillary to tissues involving external force effects: A fractional calculus approach, Phys. A Statist. Mech. Appl. 523, (2019), 48–65. 10.1016/j.physa.2019.02.018Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. Sinan, K. Shah, P. Kumam, I. Mahariq, K. J. Ansari, Z. Ahmad, et al., Fractional order mathematical modeling of typhoid fever disease, Results Phys. 32 (2022), no. 105044, 1–13. 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.105044Search in Google Scholar

[10] F. Jarad, T. Abdeljawad, and D. Baleanu, Stability of q-fractional non-autonomous systems, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 14 (2013), no. 1, 780–784. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2012.08.001Search in Google Scholar

[11] S. Liang and M. E. Samei, New approach to solutions of a class of singular fractional q-differential problem via quantum calculus, Adv. Difference Equ. 14 (2020), 1–22. 10.1186/s13662-019-2489-2Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Tariboon, S. K. Ntouyas, and P. Agarwa, New concepts of fractional quantum calculus and applications to impulsive fractional q-difference equations, Adv. Difference Equ. 18 (2015), 1–19. 10.1186/s13662-014-0348-8Search in Google Scholar

[13] B. C. Dhage and V. Lakshmikantham, Basic results on hybrid differential equations, Nonlinear Anal Hybrid Sys. 4, (2010), no. 3, 414–424. 10.1016/j.nahs.2009.10.005Search in Google Scholar

[14] B. Dhage and N. Jadhav, Basic results in the theory of hybrid differential equations with linear perturbations of second type, Tamkang J. Math. 44 (2013), no. 2, 171–186. 10.5556/j.tkjm.44.2013.1086Search in Google Scholar

[15] B. C. Dhage, On a fixed point theorem in Banach algebras with applications, Appl. Math. Lett. 18 (2005), no. 3, 273–280. 10.1016/j.aml.2003.10.014Search in Google Scholar

[16] A. Boutiara, S. Etemad, J. Alzabut, A. Hussain, M. Subramanian, and S. Rezapour, On a nonlinear sequential four-point fractional q-difference equation involving q-integral operators in boundary conditions along with stability criteria, Adv. Difference Equ. 367 (2021), 1–23. 10.1186/s13662-021-03525-3Search in Google Scholar

[17] M. I. Abbas and M. A. Ragusa, On the hybrid fractional differential equations with fractional proportional derivatives of a function with respect to a certain function, Symmetry 13 (2021), no. 2, 264. 10.3390/sym13020264Search in Google Scholar

[18] A. Ali, K. Shah, and R. A. Khan, Existence of solution to a coupled system of hybrid fractional differential equations, Bull. Math. Anal. Appl. 9 (2017), no. 1, 9–18. Search in Google Scholar

[19] K. Buvaneswari, P. Karthikeyan, and D. Baleanu, On a system of fractional coupled hybrid Hadamard differential equations with terminal conditions, Adv. Difference Equ. 419 (2020), 1–12. 10.1186/s13662-020-02790-ySearch in Google Scholar

[20] A. Samadi, S. K. Ntouyas, and J. Tariboon, Nonlocal coupled hybrid fractional system of mixed fractional derivatives via an extension of Darboas theorem, Aims Math. 6 (2021), no. 4, 3915–3926. 10.3934/math.2021232Search in Google Scholar

[21] B. Ahmad and S. K. Ntouyas, Fractional q-difference hybrid equations and inclusions with Dirichlet boundary conditions, Adv. Difference Equ. 199 (2014), 1–14. 10.1186/1687-1847-2014-199Search in Google Scholar

[22] M. Houas, Existence and stability results for hybrid fractional q-differential pantograph equations, Asia Mathematika 5 (2021), no. 2, 20–35. Search in Google Scholar

[23] M. E. Samei and G. K. Ranjbar, Some theorems of existence of solutions for fractional hybrid q-difference inclusions, J. Adv. Math. Stud. 12 (2019), no. 1, 63–76. 10.1186/s13660-019-2224-2Search in Google Scholar

[24] M. Hannabou, K. Hilal, and A. Kajouni, Existence results of hybrid fractional sequential integro-differential equations, Eng. Math. Lett. 2 (2020), 1–19. 10.1155/2020/3038427Search in Google Scholar

[25] R. A. Khan, S. Gul, F. Jarad, and H. Khan, Existence results for a general class of sequential hybrid fractional differential equations Adv. Difference Equ. 284 (2021), 1–14. 10.1186/s13662-021-03444-3Search in Google Scholar

[26] M. Klimek, Sequential fractional differential equations with Hadamard derivative, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 16 (2011), 4689–4697. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.01.018Search in Google Scholar

[27] H. Mohammadi, S. Rezapour, S. Etemad, and D. Baleanu, Two sequential fractional hybrid differential inclusions, Adv. Difference Equ. 385 (2020), 1–24. 10.1186/s13662-020-02850-3Search in Google Scholar

[28] M. H. Annaby and Z. S. Mansour, q-fractional calculus and equations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics. vol. 2056, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2012. 10.1007/978-3-642-30898-7Search in Google Scholar

[29] R. Floreanini and L. Vinet. Quantum symmetries of q-difference equations, J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995), no. 6, 3134–3156. 10.1063/1.531017Search in Google Scholar

[30] R. P. Agarwal, Certain fractional q-integrals and q-derivatives, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 66 (1969), 365–370. 10.1017/S0305004100045060Search in Google Scholar

[31] P. M. Rajkovic, S. D. Marinkovic, and M. S. Stankovic, On q-analogues of Caputo derivative and Mittag-Leffer function, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 10 (2007), no. 4, 359–373. Search in Google Scholar

[32] J. Choi and P Agarwal, Some new Saigo type fractional integral inequalities and their q-analogues, Abstract Appl. Anal. 2014 (2014), 579260, 1–12. 10.1155/2014/579260Search in Google Scholar

[33] A. Granas and J. Dugundji, Fixed Point Theory, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2003. 10.1007/978-0-387-21593-8Search in Google Scholar

[34] M. Jamil, R. A. Khan, and K. Shah, Existence theory to a class of boundary value problems of hybrid fractional sequential integro-differential equations, Adv. Difference Equ. 77 (2019), 1–12. 10.1186/s13661-019-1190-4Search in Google Scholar

[35] V. Kalvandi, M. E. Samei, New stability results for a sum-type fractional q-integro-differential equation, J. Adv. Math. Stud. 12 (2019), no. 2, 201–209. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-11-10
Revised: 2022-12-06
Accepted: 2023-01-20
Published Online: 2023-03-21

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. A novel class of bipolar soft separation axioms concerning crisp points
  3. Duality for convolution on subclasses of analytic functions and weighted integral operators
  4. Existence of a solution to an infinite system of weighted fractional integral equations of a function with respect to another function via a measure of noncompactness
  5. On the existence of nonnegative radial solutions for Dirichlet exterior problems on the Heisenberg group
  6. Hyers-Ulam stability of isometries on bounded domains-II
  7. Asymptotic study of Leray solution of 3D-Navier-Stokes equations with exponential damping
  8. Semi-Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability for an integro-differential equation of order 𝓃
  9. Jordan triple (α,β)-higher ∗-derivations on semiprime rings
  10. The asymptotic behaviors of solutions for higher-order (m1, m2)-coupled Kirchhoff models with nonlinear strong damping
  11. Approximation of the image of the Lp ball under Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator
  12. Best proximity points in -metric spaces with applications
  13. Approximation spaces inspired by subset rough neighborhoods with applications
  14. A numerical Haar wavelet-finite difference hybrid method and its convergence for nonlinear hyperbolic partial differential equation
  15. A novel conservative numerical approximation scheme for the Rosenau-Kawahara equation
  16. Fekete-Szegö functional for a class of non-Bazilevic functions related to quasi-subordination
  17. On local fractional integral inequalities via generalized ( h ˜ 1 , h ˜ 2 ) -preinvexity involving local fractional integral operators with Mittag-Leffler kernel
  18. On some geometric results for generalized k-Bessel functions
  19. Convergence analysis of M-iteration for 𝒢-nonexpansive mappings with directed graphs applicable in image deblurring and signal recovering problems
  20. Some results of homogeneous expansions for a class of biholomorphic mappings defined on a Reinhardt domain in ℂn
  21. Graded weakly 1-absorbing primary ideals
  22. The existence and uniqueness of solutions to a functional equation arising in psychological learning theory
  23. Some aspects of the n-ary orthogonal and b(αn,βn)-best approximations of b(αn,βn)-hypermetric spaces over Banach algebras
  24. Numerical solution of a malignant invasion model using some finite difference methods
  25. Increasing property and logarithmic convexity of functions involving Dirichlet lambda function
  26. Feature fusion-based text information mining method for natural scenes
  27. Global optimum solutions for a system of (k, ψ)-Hilfer fractional differential equations: Best proximity point approach
  28. The study of solutions for several systems of PDDEs with two complex variables
  29. Regularity criteria via horizontal component of velocity for the Boussinesq equations in anisotropic Lorentz spaces
  30. Generalized Stević-Sharma operators from the minimal Möbius invariant space into Bloch-type spaces
  31. On initial value problem for elliptic equation on the plane under Caputo derivative
  32. A dimension expanded preconditioning technique for block two-by-two linear equations
  33. Asymptotic behavior of Fréchet functional equation and some characterizations of inner product spaces
  34. Small perturbations of critical nonlocal equations with variable exponents
  35. Dynamical property of hyperspace on uniform space
  36. Some notes on graded weakly 1-absorbing primary ideals
  37. On the problem of detecting source points acting on a fluid
  38. Integral transforms involving a generalized k-Bessel function
  39. Ruled real hypersurfaces in the complex hyperbolic quadric
  40. On the monotonic properties and oscillatory behavior of solutions of neutral differential equations
  41. Approximate multi-variable bi-Jensen-type mappings
  42. Mixed-type SP-iteration for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in hyperbolic spaces
  43. On the equation fn + (f″)m ≡ 1
  44. Results on the modified degenerate Laplace-type integral associated with applications involving fractional kinetic equations
  45. Characterizations of entire solutions for the system of Fermat-type binomial and trinomial shift equations in ℂn#
  46. Commentary
  47. On I. Meghea and C. S. Stamin review article “Remarks on some variants of minimal point theorem and Ekeland variational principle with applications,” Demonstratio Mathematica 2022; 55: 354–379
  48. Special Issue on Fixed Point Theory and Applications to Various Differential/Integral Equations - Part II
  49. On Cauchy problem for pseudo-parabolic equation with Caputo-Fabrizio operator
  50. Fixed-point results for convex orbital operators
  51. Asymptotic stability of equilibria for difference equations via fixed points of enriched Prešić operators
  52. Asymptotic behavior of resolvents of equilibrium problems on complete geodesic spaces
  53. A system of additive functional equations in complex Banach algebras
  54. New inertial forward–backward algorithm for convex minimization with applications
  55. Uniqueness of solutions for a ψ-Hilfer fractional integral boundary value problem with the p-Laplacian operator
  56. Analysis of Cauchy problem with fractal-fractional differential operators
  57. Common best proximity points for a pair of mappings with certain dominating property
  58. Investigation of hybrid fractional q-integro-difference equations supplemented with nonlocal q-integral boundary conditions
  59. The structure of fuzzy fractals generated by an orbital fuzzy iterated function system
  60. On the structure of self-affine Jordan arcs in ℝ2
  61. Solvability for a system of Hadamard-type hybrid fractional differential inclusions
  62. Three solutions for discrete anisotropic Kirchhoff-type problems
  63. On split generalized equilibrium problem with multiple output sets and common fixed points problem
  64. Special Issue on Computational and Numerical Methods for Special Functions - Part II
  65. Sandwich-type results regarding Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of q-hypergeometric function
  66. Certain aspects of Nörlund -statistical convergence of sequences in neutrosophic normed spaces
  67. On completeness of weak eigenfunctions for multi-interval Sturm-Liouville equations with boundary-interface conditions
  68. Some identities on generalized harmonic numbers and generalized harmonic functions
  69. Study of degenerate derangement polynomials by λ-umbral calculus
  70. Normal ordering associated with λ-Stirling numbers in λ-shift algebra
  71. Analytical and numerical analysis of damped harmonic oscillator model with nonlocal operators
  72. Compositions of positive integers with 2s and 3s
  73. Kinematic-geometry of a line trajectory and the invariants of the axodes
  74. Hahn Laplace transform and its applications
  75. Discrete complementary exponential and sine integral functions
  76. Special Issue on Recent Methods in Approximation Theory - Part II
  77. On the order of approximation by modified summation-integral-type operators based on two parameters
  78. Bernstein-type operators on elliptic domain and their interpolation properties
  79. A class of strongly convergent subgradient extragradient methods for solving quasimonotone variational inequalities
  80. Special Issue on Recent Advances in Fractional Calculus and Nonlinear Fractional Evaluation Equations - Part II
  81. Application of fractional quantum calculus on coupled hybrid differential systems within the sequential Caputo fractional q-derivatives
  82. On some conformable boundary value problems in the setting of a new generalized conformable fractional derivative
  83. A certain class of fractional difference equations with damping: Oscillatory properties
  84. Weighted Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for r-times differentiable preinvex functions for k-fractional integrals
  85. Special Issue on Recent Advances for Computational and Mathematical Methods in Scientific Problems - Part II
  86. The behavior of hidden bifurcation in 2D scroll via saturated function series controlled by a coefficient harmonic linearization method
  87. Phase portraits of two classes of quadratic differential systems exhibiting as solutions two cubic algebraic curves
  88. Petri net analysis of a queueing inventory system with orbital search by the server
  89. Asymptotic stability of an epidemiological fractional reaction-diffusion model
  90. On the stability of a strongly stabilizing control for degenerate systems in Hilbert spaces
  91. Special Issue on Application of Fractional Calculus: Mathematical Modeling and Control - Part I
  92. New conticrete inequalities of the Hermite-Hadamard-Jensen-Mercer type in terms of generalized conformable fractional operators via majorization
  93. Pell-Lucas polynomials for numerical treatment of the nonlinear fractional-order Duffing equation
  94. Impacts of Brownian motion and fractional derivative on the solutions of the stochastic fractional Davey-Stewartson equations
  95. Some results on fractional Hahn difference boundary value problems
  96. Properties of a subclass of analytic functions defined by Riemann-Liouville fractional integral applied to convolution product of multiplier transformation and Ruscheweyh derivative
  97. Special Issue on Development of Fuzzy Sets and Their Extensions - Part I
  98. The cross-border e-commerce platform selection based on the probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy generalized dice similarity measures
  99. Comparison of fuzzy and crisp decision matrices: An evaluation on PROBID and sPROBID multi-criteria decision-making methods
  100. Rejection and symmetric difference of bipolar picture fuzzy graph
Downloaded on 25.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dema-2022-0205/html
Scroll to top button