Home Study of degenerate derangement polynomials by λ-umbral calculus
Article Open Access

Study of degenerate derangement polynomials by λ-umbral calculus

  • Sang Jo Yun and Jin-Woo Park EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 15, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In the 1970s, Rota began to build completely rigid foundations for the theory of umbral calculus based on relatively modern ideas of linear functions and linear operators. Since then, umbral calculus has been used in the study of special functions in various fields. In this article, we derive some new and interesting identities related to degenerate derangement polynomials and some special polynomials by using λ -Sheffer sequences and λ -umbral calculus, which are defined by Kim-Kim (Degenerate Sheffer sequences and λ -Sheffer sequences, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 493 (2021), 124521, 21pp).

MSC 2010: 33E20; 11B83; 05A40

1 Intorduction

For a given set A with n elements, a derangement is a permutation of the elements in A such that no element appears in its original position. The number of derangements of A is called the n th derangement number, denoted by d n . By the definition of the derangement, we see that

d n = n ! k = 0 n ( 1 ) k k ! .

Derangement numbers are computed recursively or by means of their exponential generating function in general, and one of the important and widely covered fields in various fields such as combinatorics, applied mathematics, and engineering (see [13]). In [4], the authors found closed forms for derangement numbers with Hessenberg determinants and derivatives of the exponential generating function of these numbers. In [5], the authors investigated several interesting combinatorial, analytic, and number theoretic properties of r -derangement numbers, which are a permutation on n + r elements, such that in its cycle decomposition, the first r elements appear in distinct cycles. Clarke and Sved found a relation between the derangement numbers and the Bell numbers by using the inclusion-exclusion principle in [6]. In [7], the authors defined p , q -analog of the derangement numbers, which is a generalization of derangement numbers, and derived a recurrence for them.

For a given λ R { 0 } , the degenerate exponential function is defined to be

(1) e λ x ( t ) = ( 1 + λ t ) x λ , e λ ( t ) = ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ , (see [8]) .

Note that lim λ 0 e λ x = e x t and lim λ 0 e λ ( t ) = e t .

The study of the degenerate version of functions was first initiated by Carlitz (see [8]), and since then, degenerations of various special functions have been defined and their properties have been actively studied by many researchers. In [9], the authors defined the partially degenerate Laguerre-Bernoulli polynomials of the first kind and derived some theorems on implicit summation formulae and symmetry identities for these polynomials. In [10], the authors derived some identities and properties on the degenerate Fubini polynomials and the higher-order degenerate Fubini polynomials by using generating functions and certain differential operators. Kwon et al. defined the modified type 2 degenerate poly-Bernoulli polynomials and derived some explicit expressions and their representations by using λ -umbral calculus (see [11]). In [12], the authors defined the degenerate poly-Genocchi polynomials and numbers by using the degenerate polylogarithm function and gave some identities of those polynomials and explicit expressions of degenerate unipoly polynomials related to special polynomials. Kim and Khan introduced a new type of degenerate poly-Frobenius-Euler polynomials and numbers, and derived some combinatorial identities related to these polynomials in [13]. Acikgoz and Duran introduced unified degenerate central Bell polynomials and studied many relations and formulae including the summation formula and derivative properties (see [14]).

For nonzero integers n and k , the Stirling numbers of the first kind S 1 ( n , k ) and the Stirling numbers of the second kind S 2 ( n , k ) , respectively, are given by

(2) ( x ) n = k = 0 n S 1 ( n , k ) x k and x n = k = 0 n S 2 ( n , k ) ( x ) k , (see [1,3,8,15,16]) ,

where ( x ) 0 = 1 , ( x ) n = x ( x 1 ) ( x n + 1 ) , ( n 1 ) are the falling factorial sequences.

By using the degenerate exponential function, the degenerate derangement polynomials are defined by the generating function to be

1 1 t e λ x 1 ( t ) = n = 0 d n , λ ( x ) t n n ! , (see [2]) .

When x = 0 , d n , λ ( 0 ) = d n , λ are called the degenerate derangement numbers.

By the definition of degenerate derangement polynomials,

n = 0 d n , λ ( x ) t n n ! = 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) e λ x ( t ) = n = 0 d n , λ t n n ! n = 0 ( x ) n , λ t n n ! = n = 0 r = 0 n n r d n r , λ ( x ) r , λ t n n ! ,

and thus, we see that

(3) d n , λ ( x ) = r = 0 n n r d n r , λ ( x ) r , λ .

As the degenerate version of the Stirling numbers of the first and the second kind, the degenerate Stirling numbers of the first kind S 1 , λ ( n , k ) and the degenerate Stirling numbers of the second kind S 2 , λ ( n , k ) are, respectively, introduced by Kim et al. (see [9,16]) as follows:

(4) 1 k ! ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) k = n = k S 1 , λ ( n , k ) t n n ! and 1 k ! ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) k = n = k S 2 , λ ( n , k ) t n n ! .

Let C be the field of complex numbers,

= f ( t ) = n = 0 a n t n n ! a k C ,

and let

P = C [ x ] = k = 0 a k x k a k C with a k = 0 for all but finite number of k .

Let P be the vector space of all linear functionals on P .

For given λ R { 0 } , the linear functional f ( t ) λ on P , called λ -linear functional given by f ( t ) , is defined by

(5) f ( t ) ( x ) n , λ λ = a n , ( n 0 ) , (see [17]) ,

where ( x ) 0 , λ = 1 , ( x ) n , λ = x ( x λ ) ( x ( n 1 ) λ ) , ( n 1 ) . From (5), we have

(6) t k ( x ) n , λ λ = n ! δ n , k , ( n , k 0 ) ,

where δ n , k is the Kronecker’s symbol (see [17]).

For each real number λ and each positive integer k , Kim and Kim defined the differential operator on P in [17] by

( t k ) λ ( x ) n , λ = ( n ) k ( x ) n k , λ , if k n , 0 , if k n ,

and for any f ( t ) = k = 0 a k t k k ! ,

(7) ( f ( t ) ) λ ( x ) n , λ = k = 0 n n k a k ( x ) n k , λ .

In addition, they showed that for f ( t ) , g ( t ) , and p ( x ) P ,

(8) f ( t ) g ( t ) p ( x ) λ = g ( t ) ( f ( t ) ) λ p ( x ) λ = f ( t ) ( g ( t ) ) λ p ( x ) λ .

The order o ( f ( t ) ) of f ( t ) { 0 } is the smallest integer k for which the coefficient of t k does not vanish. If o ( f ( t ) ) = 0 , then f ( t ) is said to be invertible, and such series has a multiplicative inverse 1 f ( t ) of f ( t ) . If o ( f ( t ) ) = 1 , then f ( t ) is called delta series, and it has a compositional inverse f ¯ ( t ) of f ( t ) with f ¯ ( f ( t ) ) = f ( f ¯ ( t ) ) = t (see [1719]).

Let f ( t ) be a delta series, and let g ( t ) be an invertible series. Then there exists a unique sequence S n , λ ( x ) ( deg S n , λ ( x ) = n ) of polynomials satisfying the orthogonality conditions:

(9) g ( t ) ( f ( t ) ) k S n , λ ( x ) λ = n ! δ n , k , ( n , k 0 ) .

(see [17]). Here S n , λ ( x ) is called the λ -Sheffer sequence for ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) , which is denoted by S n , λ ( x ) ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) λ . The sequence S n , λ ( x ) is the λ -Sheffer sequence for ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) if and only if

(10) 1 g ( f ¯ ( t ) ) e λ y ( f ¯ ( t ) ) = n = 0 S n , λ ( y ) t n n ! ,

for all y C , where f ¯ ( t ) is the compositional inverse of f ( t ) such that f ( f ¯ ( t ) ) = f ¯ ( f ( t ) ) = t (see [17]).

Let S n , λ ( x ) ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) λ and let h ( x ) = l = 0 n a l S l , λ ( x ) P . Then by (9), we have

g ( t ) ( f ( t ) ) k h ( x ) λ = l = 0 n a l g ( t ) ( f ( t ) ) k S l , λ ( x ) λ = k ! a k ,

and thus, we know that

(11) a k = 1 k ! g ( t ) ( f ( t ) ) k h ( x ) λ .

The following theorem is proved by Kim and Kim [17] and is very useful tools for researching degenerate versions of special polynomials and numbers.

Theorem 1.1

Let s n , λ ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) λ , r n , λ = ( h ( t ) , l ( t ) ) λ . Then we have

s n , λ = k = 0 n c n , k r k , λ ,

where

c n , k = 1 k ! h ( f ¯ ( t ) ) g ( f ¯ ( t ) ) ( l ( f ¯ ( t ) ) ) k ( x ) n , λ λ .

Let ( x ) n = k = 0 n c n , k ( x ) k , λ . Since

( x ) n ( 1 , e λ ( t ) 1 ) λ and ( x ) n , λ ( 1 , t ) λ ,

by Theorem 1.1, we obtain

c n , k = 1 k ! ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) k ( x ) n , λ λ = l = k S 1 , λ ( l , k ) 1 l ! t l ( x ) n , λ λ = S 1 , λ ( n , k ) ,

and thus, we know that

(12) ( x ) n = k = 0 n S 1 , λ ( n , k ) ( x ) k , λ .

In the similar way, we also know that

(13) ( x ) n , λ = k = 0 n S 2 , λ ( n , k ) ( x ) k .

Umbral calculus consisted of primarily symbolic techniques for sequence manipulation with little mathematical rigor. In the 1970s, Rota began to build a completely rigid foundation for theories based on relatively modern ideas of linear functions and linear operators (see [19]). Umbral calculus contributed to the generalization of Lagrange inversion formula and has been applied in many fields such as combinatorial counting with linear recurrences and lattice path counting, graph theory using chromatic polynomials, probability theory, link invariant theory, statistics, topology, physics, etc. (see [18,19]). In addition, it is being actively applied in various fields by researchers (see [1725]).

In the past few years, various different umbral calculus has been studied (see [1720]). In particular, Kim and Kim defined the degenerate Sheffer sequences, λ -Sheffer sequence, a family of λ -linear functionals, and λ -differential operators in [17].

In this article, we derive some interesting identities related to degenerate derangement polynomials, degenerate Bernoulli polynomials, degenerate Euler polynomials, degenerate Daehee polynomials, Changhee polynomials, degenerate Bell polynomials, degenerate Lah-Bell polynomials, Mittag-Leffer polynomials, and degenerate Frobenius-Euler polynomials by using λ -umbral calculus.

2 Main results

By the definition of degenerate derangement polynomials, we note that

(14) d n , λ ( x ) ( ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) , t ) λ .

In addition,

(15) 1 1 t e λ x 1 ( t ) = n = 0 t n n = 0 ( x 1 ) n , λ t n n ! = n = 0 l = 0 n n ! l ! ( x 1 ) l , λ t n n ! .

From (2) and (13), we obtain

(16) d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n n ! l ! ( x 1 ) l , λ = n ! l = 0 n k = 0 l m = 0 k S 2 , λ ( l , k ) S 1 ( k , m ) l ! ( x 1 ) m = n ! l = 0 n k = 0 l m = 0 k a = 0 m S 2 , λ ( l , k ) S 1 ( k , m ) l ! ( 1 ) m a x a .

Let d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n a n , l ( x ) l , λ . Since ( x ) n , λ ( 1 , t ) λ , by Theorem 1.1, we have

(17) a n , l = 1 l ! 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) t l ( x ) n , λ λ = n l m = 0 d m , λ t m m ! ( x ) n l , λ λ = n l d n l , λ ,

and by (15),

(18) 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) = n = 0 l = 0 n ( 1 ) l 1 l , λ l ! t n n ! .

By (17) and (18), we have

(19) d n , λ = n l m = 0 n l ( 1 ) m 1 m , λ m ! .

Conversely, we may assume that ( x ) n , λ = l = 0 n b n , l d l , λ ( x ) . Note that

(20) ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) = ( 1 t ) n = 0 ( 1 ) n , λ t n n ! = n = 0 ( 1 ) n , λ t n n ! n = 0 ( 1 ) n , λ t n + 1 n ! = 1 + n = 1 ( ( 1 ) n , λ n ( 1 ) n 1 , λ ) t n n ! .

By (19) and (20),

(21) b n , l = 1 l ! ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) t l ( x ) n , λ λ = n l ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( x ) n l , λ λ = n l 1 ( x ) n l , λ λ + n l m = 1 ( ( 1 ) m , λ m ( 1 ) m 1 , λ ) t m m ! ( x ) n l , λ λ = 1 + n l ( ( 1 ) n l , λ ( n l ) ( 1 ) n l 1 , λ ) ( 1 δ n , l ) .

By (17), (19), and (21), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.1

For each nonnegative integer n, we have

d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n n l d n l , λ ( x ) l , λ = l = 0 n m = 0 n l n l ( 1 ) m 1 m , λ m ! ( x ) l , λ ,

and

( x ) n , λ = l = 0 n 1 + n l ( ( 1 ) n l , λ ( n l ) ( 1 ) n l 1 , λ ) ( 1 δ n , l ) d l , λ ( x ) .

The degenerate Bernoulli polynomials are defined by the generating function to be

t e λ ( t ) 1 e λ x ( t ) = n = 0 β n , λ ( x ) t n n ! , (see [8,17,22]) .

In the special case x = 0 , β n , λ ( 0 ) = β n , λ are called the degenerate Bernoulli numbers. By the definition of degenerate Bernoulli polynomials, the λ -Sheffer sequences of these polynomials are as follows:

β n , λ ( x ) e λ ( t ) 1 t , t λ .

Note that

(22) e λ ( t ) 1 t = n = 0 ( 1 ) n + 1 , λ n + 1 t n n ! .

Let d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n a n , l β l , λ ( x ) . By Theorem 1.1 and (22), we have

(23) a n , l = 1 l ! e λ ( t ) 1 t ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) t l ( x ) n , λ λ = n l 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) e λ ( t ) 1 t λ ( x ) n l , λ λ = k = 0 n l n l n l k ( 1 ) k + 1 , λ k + 1 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( x ) n l k , λ λ = k = 0 n l r = 0 n l k n l n l k ( 1 ) k + 1 , λ ( 1 ) r 1 r , λ ( k + 1 ) r ! .

In addition, by (3), we obtain

(24) a n , l = 1 l ! e λ ( t ) 1 t ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) t l ( x ) n , λ λ = n l e λ ( t ) 1 t 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) λ ( x ) n l , λ λ = n l m = 0 n l n l m d m , λ e λ ( t ) 1 t ( x ) n l m , λ λ = m = 0 n l n l n l m ( 1 ) n l m + 1 , λ n l m + 1 d m , λ .

Conversely, we assume that β n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n b n , l d l , λ ( x ) . Then, by (20), we obtain

(25) b n , l = 1 l ! ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) e λ ( t ) 1 t t l ( x ) n , λ λ = n l t e λ ( t ) 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( x ) n l , λ λ = m = 0 n l n l m β m , λ ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( x ) n l m , λ λ = β n l , λ + m = 0 n l 1 n l m β m , λ ( ( 1 ) n l m , λ ( n l m ) ( 1 ) n l m 1 , λ ) .

By (23), (24), and (25), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.2

For each nonnegative integer n, we have

d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n k = 0 n l r = 0 n l k n l n l k ( 1 ) k + 1 , λ ( 1 ) r 1 r , λ ( k + 1 ) r ! β l , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n m = 0 n l n l n l m ( 1 ) n l m + 1 , λ n l m + 1 d m , λ β l , λ ( x )

β n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n β n l , λ + m = 0 n l 1 n l m β m , λ ( ( 1 ) n l m , λ ( n l m ) ( 1 ) n l m 1 , λ ) d l , λ ( x ) .

The degenerate Euler polynomials are defined by the generating function to be

(26) 2 e λ ( t ) + 1 e λ x ( t ) = n = 0 E n , λ ( x ) t n n ! , (see [8]) .

When x = 0 , E n , λ = E n , λ ( 0 ) are called the degenerate Euler numbers. By the definition of degenerate Euler polynomials, we see that

E n , λ ( x ) e λ ( t ) + 1 2 , t λ .

Let d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n a n , l E l , λ ( x ) . Since

(27) e λ ( t ) + 1 2 = 1 + 1 2 m = 1 ( 1 ) m , λ t m m ! ,

by Theorem 1.1, (22), and (27), we obtain

(28) a n , l = 1 l ! e λ ( t ) + 1 2 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) t l ( x ) n , λ λ = n l 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) e λ ( t ) + 1 2 ( x ) n l , λ λ = a = 0 n l n l n l a d a , λ e λ ( t ) + 1 2 ( x ) n l a , λ λ = n l d n l , λ + a = 0 n l 1 n l n l a ( 1 ) n l a , λ 2 d a , λ .

Conversely, assume that E n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n a n , l d l , λ ( x ) . Then, by (20), we obtain

(29) a n , l = 1 l ! ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) e λ ( t ) + 1 2 t l ( x ) n , λ λ = n l 2 e λ ( t ) + 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( x ) n l , λ λ = a = 0 n l n l n l a E a , λ ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( x ) n l a , λ λ = n l E n l , λ + a = 0 n l a n l n l a ( ( 1 ) n l a , λ ( n l a ) ( 1 ) n l a 1 , λ ) .

By (28) and (29), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.3

For each nonnegative integer n, we have

d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n n l d n l , λ + a = 0 n l 1 n l n l a ( 1 ) n l a , λ 2 d a , λ E l , λ ( x )

and

E n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n n l E n l , λ + a = 0 n l a n l n l a ( ( 1 ) n l a , λ ( n l a ) ( 1 ) n l a 1 , λ ) d l , λ ( x ) .

The degenerate Daehee polynomials are defined by the generating function to be

log λ ( 1 + t ) t e λ x ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) = n = 0 D n , λ ( x ) t n n ! , (see [26,27]) .

In the special case x = 0 , D n , λ = D n , λ ( 0 ) are called the degenerate Daehee numbers. Note that, by (4),

log λ ( 1 + t ) t e λ x ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) = n = 0 D n , λ t n n ! n = 0 ( x ) n , λ 1 n ! ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) n = n = 0 D n , λ t n n ! n = 0 ( x ) n , λ l = n S 1 , λ ( l , n ) t l l ! = n = 0 r = 0 n k = 0 r n r S 1 , λ ( r , k ) D n r , λ ( x ) k , λ t n n ! ,

and so we see that

(30) D n , λ ( x ) = r = 0 n k = 0 r n r S 1 , λ ( r , k ) D n r , λ ( x ) k , λ .

In addition,

D n , λ ( x ) e λ ( t ) 1 t , e λ ( t ) 1 λ .

Let d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n a n , l D l , λ ( x ) . By Theorem 1.1, (22), and (27), we obtain

(31) a n , l = 1 l ! e λ ( t ) 1 t ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) l ( x ) n , λ λ = m = l n S 2 , λ ( m , l ) n m 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) e λ ( t ) 1 t ( x ) n m , λ λ = m = 0 n a = 0 n m n m n m a S 2 , λ ( m , l ) d a , λ e λ ( t ) 1 t ( x ) n m a , λ λ = m = 0 n a = 0 n m n m n m a S 2 , λ ( m , l ) d a , λ ( 1 ) n m a + 1 , λ n m a + 1 .

Conversely, assume that D n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n b n , l d l , λ ( x ) . By (17), (20), and (30), we have

(32) b n , l = 1 l ! ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) t l D n , λ ( x ) λ = r = 0 n k = l r n r S 1 , λ ( r , k ) D n r , λ 1 l ! ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) t l ( x ) k , λ λ = r = 0 n k = l r n r S 1 , λ ( r , k ) D n r , λ k l ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( x ) k l , λ λ = r = 0 n n r S 1 , λ ( r , l ) D n r , λ + r = 0 n k = l + 1 r n r k l S 1 , λ ( r , k ) D n r , λ ( ( 1 ) k l , λ ( k l ) ( 1 ) k l 1 , λ ) .

By (31) and (32), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.4

For each nonnegative integer n, we have

d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n m = 0 n a = 0 n m n m n m a S 2 , λ ( m , l ) d a , λ ( 1 ) n m a + 1 , λ n m a + 1 D l , λ ( x )

and

D n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n r = 0 n n r S 1 , λ ( r , l ) D n r , λ + r = 0 n r = l + 1 r n r k l S 1 , λ ( r , k ) D n r , λ ( ( 1 ) k l , λ ( k l ) ( 1 ) k l 1 , λ ) d l , λ ( x ) .

The Changhee polynomials are defined by the generating function to be

2 2 + t e λ x ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) = n = 0 Ch n ( x ) t n n ! , (see [28,29]) .

When x = 0 , Ch n = Ch n ( 0 ) are called the Changhee numbers. Note that, by (4),

2 2 + t e λ x ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) = n = 0 Ch n t n n ! n = 0 ( x ) n , λ 1 n ! ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) n = n = 0 Ch n t n n ! n = 0 ( x ) n , λ l = n S 1 , λ ( l , n ) t l l ! = n = 0 r = 0 n k = 0 r n r S 1 , λ ( r , k ) Ch n r ( x ) k , λ t n n ! ,

and so we see that

(33) Ch n ( x ) = r = 0 n k = 0 r n r S 1 , λ ( r , k ) Ch n r ( x ) k , λ .

In addition, by the definition of Changhee polynomials, we see the λ -Sheffer sequences of the Changhee polynomials are as follows:

Ch n ( x ) 1 + e λ ( t ) 2 , e λ ( t ) 1 λ .

Let d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n a n , l Ch l ( x ) . By (4), Theorem 1.1, (22), and (27), we obtain

(34) a n , l = 1 l ! e λ ( t ) + 1 2 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) l ( x ) n , λ λ = m = l n n m S 2 , λ ( m , l ) e λ ( t ) + 1 2 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( x ) n m , λ λ = m = l n a = 0 n m n m n m a S 2 , λ ( m , l ) d a , λ e λ ( t ) + 1 2 ( x ) n m a , λ λ = m = l n a = 0 n m 1 n m n m a S 2 , λ ( m , l ) d a , λ ( 1 ) n m a , λ 2 + m = l n n m S 2 , λ ( m , l ) d n m , λ .

Conversely, assume that Ch n ( x ) = l = 0 n b n , l d l , λ ( x ) . Then, by (20) and (33), we obtain

(35) b n , l = 1 l ! ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) t l Ch n ( x ) λ = r = 0 n k = 0 r n r S 1 , λ ( r , k ) Ch n r 1 l ! ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) t l ( x ) k , λ λ = r = 0 n k = 0 r n r k l S 1 , λ ( r , k ) Ch n r ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( x ) k l , λ λ = r = 0 n n r S 1 , λ ( r , l ) Ch n r + r = 0 n k = l + 1 r n r k l S 1 , λ Ch n r ( ( 1 ) k l , λ ( k l ) ( 1 ) k l 1 , λ ) .

By (34) and (35), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.5

For each nonnegative integer n, we have

d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n m = l n a = 0 n m 1 n m n m a S 2 , λ ( m , l ) d a , λ ( 1 ) n m a , λ 2 + m = l n n m S 2 , λ ( m , l ) d n m , λ Ch l ( x ) ,

and

Ch n ( x ) = l = 0 n r = 0 n n r S 1 , λ ( r , l ) Ch n r + r = 0 n k = l + 1 r n r k l S 1 , λ Ch n r ( ( 1 ) k l , λ ( k l ) ( 1 ) k l 1 , λ ) d l , λ .

The degenerate Bell polynomials are defined by the generating function to be

e λ x ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) = n = 0 Bel n , λ ( x ) t n n ! , (see [17,30]) .

In the special case x = 1 , Bel n , λ = Bel n , λ ( 1 ) are called the degenerate Bell numbers. By the definition of the Bell polynomials, we see that

(36) Bel n , λ ( x ) ( 1 , log λ ( 1 + t ) ) λ .

Note that

e λ x ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) = n = 0 ( x ) n , λ 1 n ! ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) n = n = 0 ( x ) n , λ l = n S 2 , λ ( l , n ) t n n ! = n = 0 m = 0 n S 2 , λ ( n , m ) ( x ) m , λ t n n ! ,

and thus, see that

(37) Bel n , λ = m = 0 n S 2 , λ ( n , m ) ( x ) m , λ .

Let d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n a n , l Bel l , λ ( x ) . Then by Theorem 1.1, (2), and (36), we obtain

(38) a n , l = 1 l ! 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) l ( x ) n , λ λ = m = l n n m S 1 , λ ( m , l ) 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( x ) n m , λ λ = m = l n n m S 1 , λ ( m , l ) d n m , λ ,

and by (19) and (38), we have

(39) a n , l = m = l n r = 0 n m n m S 1 , λ ( m , l ) ( 1 ) r 1 r , λ r ! .

Conversely, assume that Bel n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n b n , l d l , λ ( x ) . Since

(40) e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) = n = 0 ( 1 ) n , λ 1 n ! ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) n = n = 0 ( 1 ) n , λ l = m S 2 , λ ( l , m ) t l l ! = m = 0 r = 0 m ( 1 ) r , λ S 2 , λ ( m , r ) t m m ! ,

by (37) and (40), we have

(41) b n , l = 1 l ! ( 1 ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) ) e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) l ( x ) n , λ λ = m = l n n m S 2 , λ ( m , l ) ( 1 ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) ) e λ ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) ( x ) n m , λ λ = m = l n a = 0 n m r = 0 a n m n m a S 2 , λ ( m , l ) S 2 , λ ( a , r ) ( 1 ) r , λ ( 1 ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) ) ( x ) n m a , λ λ = 2 m = l n r = 0 n m n m S 2 , λ ( m , l ) S 2 , λ ( n m , r ) ( 1 ) r , λ m = l n a = 0 n m r = 0 a n m n m a S 2 , λ ( m , l ) S 2 , λ ( a , r ) ( 1 ) r , λ ( 1 ) n m a , λ ,

and by (20) and (37), we obtain

(42) a n , l = 1 l ! ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) t l Bel n , λ ( x ) λ = m = 0 n m l S 2 , λ ( n , m ) ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( x ) m l , λ λ = S 2 , λ ( n , l ) + m = l + 1 n m l S 2 , λ ( n , m ) ( ( 1 ) m l , λ ( m l ) ( 1 ) m l 1 , λ ) .

By (38), (39), (41), and (42), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.6

For each nonnegative integer n, we have

d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n m = l n n m S 1 , λ ( m , l ) d n m , λ Bel l , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n m = l n r = 0 n m n m S 1 , λ ( m , l ) ( 1 ) r 1 r , λ r ! Bel l , λ ( x ) ,

and

Bel n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n 2 m = l n r = 0 n m n m S 2 , λ ( m , l ) S 2 , λ ( n m , r ) ( 1 ) r , λ m = l n a = 0 n m r = 0 a n m n m a S 2 , λ ( m , l ) S 2 , λ ( a , r ) ( 1 ) r , λ ( 1 ) n m a , λ d l , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n S 2 , λ ( n , l ) + m = l + 1 n m l S 2 , λ ( n , m ) ( ( 1 ) m l , λ ( m l ) ( 1 ) m l 1 , λ ) d l , λ ( x ) .

The explicit formula of the unsigned Lah number L ( n , k ) is

(43) L ( n , k ) = n 1 k 1 n ! k ! , (see [22,31]) .

By (43), we can derive the generating function of L ( n , k ) to be

(44) 1 k ! t 1 t k = n = k L ( n , k ) t n n ! , ( k 0 ) , (see [22,31]) .

Recently, Kim and Kim defined the degenerate Lah-Bell polynomials by the generating function to be

e λ x t 1 t = n = 0 B n , λ L ( x ) t n n ! , (see [32]) .

When x = 1 , B n , λ L = B n , λ L ( 1 ) are called the degenerate Lah-Bell numbers. By the definition of degenerate Lah-Bell polynomials, we see that

(45) B n , λ L ( x ) 1 , t 1 + t λ and B n , λ L ( x ) = m = 0 n L ( n , m ) ( x ) m , λ .

Let d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n a n , l B l , λ L ( x ) . Since

(46) t 1 + t l = r = l ( 1 ) r l l r l t r ( r l ) ! ,

where x 0 = 1 and x n = x ( x + 1 ) ( x + l 1 ) , n 1 . By (46), we obtain

(47) a n , l = 1 l ! 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) t 1 + t l ( x ) n , λ λ = r = l n ( 1 ) r l l r l r l n r 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( x ) n r , λ λ = r = l n ( 1 ) r l l r l n r r l d n r , λ ,

and by (19) and (47), we have

(48) a n , l = r = l n a = 0 n r n r r l ( 1 ) r l l r l ( 1 ) a 1 a , λ a ! .

Conversely, assume that B n , λ L ( x ) = l = 0 n b n , l d l , λ . Then

(49) b n , l = 1 l ! 1 t 1 t e λ t 1 t t 1 t l ( x ) n , λ λ = m = l n n m L ( m , l ) 1 2 t 1 t e λ t 1 t ( x ) n m , λ λ = m = l n r = 0 n m n m n m r L ( m , l ) B r , λ L 1 + 2 1 t ( x ) n m r , λ λ = m = l n n m L ( m , l ) B n m , λ L + 2 m = l n r = 0 n m n m n m r ( n m r ) ! L ( m , l ) B r , λ L .

In addition, by (45), we have

(50) a n , l = 1 l ! ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) t l B n , λ L ( x ) λ = m = 0 n L ( n , m ) 1 l ! ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) t l ( x ) m , λ λ = m = 0 n m l L ( n , m ) ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( x ) m l , λ λ = L ( n , l ) + m = l + 1 n m l L ( n , m ) ( ( 1 ) m l , λ ( m l ) ( 1 ) m l 1 , λ ) .

By (47), (48), (49), and (50), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.7

For each nonnegative integer n, we have

d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n r = l n ( 1 ) r l l r l n r r l d r l , λ B l , λ L ( x ) = l = 0 n r = l n a = 0 n r n r r l ( 1 ) r l l r l ( 1 ) a 1 a , λ a ! B l , λ L ( x ) .

and

B n , λ L ( x ) = l = 0 n m = l n n m L ( m , l ) B n m , λ L + 2 m = l n r = 0 n m n m n m r ( n m r ) ! L ( m , l ) B r , λ L d l , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n L ( n , l ) + m = l + 1 n m l L ( n , m ) ( ( 1 ) m l , λ ( m l ) ( 1 ) m l 1 , λ ) d l , λ ( x ) .

The Mittag-Leffer polynomials are defined by the generating function to be

1 + t 1 t x = n = 0 M n ( x ) t n n ! , (see [18,22]) .

In the special case x = 1 , M n = M n ( 1 ) are called the Mittag-Leffer numbers. Note that

(51) 1 + t 1 t x = n = 0 x n 2 t 1 t n = n = 0 m = 0 2 n ( x ) n ( n + m ) ! n ! m ! n m t n + m ( n + m ) ! = r = 0 n = 0 r r n 2 n ( x ) n n r n t r r ! ,

and so, by the definition of Mittag-Leffer polynomials and (20),

(52) M n ( x ) = m = 0 n k = 0 m n m 2 m m n m S 1 , λ ( m , k ) ( x ) k , λ

and

(53) ( e λ ( t ) + 1 ) l = 2 l 1 + e λ ( t ) 1 2 l = r = 0 2 r l ( 1 ) r l r 1 r ! ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) r = b = 0 r = 0 b 2 r l ( 1 ) r l r S 2 , λ ( b , r ) t b b ! .

Let d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n a n , l M l ( x ) . Since

M n ( x ) 1 , e λ ( t ) 1 e λ ( t ) + 1 ,

by (53), we obtain

(54) a n , l = 1 l ! 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) e λ ( t ) 1 e λ ( t ) + 1 l ( x ) n , λ λ = 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( e λ ( t ) + 1 ) l 1 l ! ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) l λ ( x ) n , λ λ = m = l n n m S 2 , λ ( m , l ) 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( e λ ( t ) + 1 ) l ( x ) n m , λ λ = m = l n b = 0 n m r = 0 b n m n m b 2 l r ( 1 ) r l r S 2 , λ ( m , l ) S 2 , λ ( b , r ) 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( x ) n m b , λ λ = m = l n b = 0 n m r = 0 b n m n m b ( 1 ) r l r 2 l + r S 2 , λ ( m , l ) S 2 , λ ( b , r ) d n m b , λ ,

and by (19) and (54), we have

(55) a n , l = m = l n b = 0 n m r = 0 b a = 0 n m b n m n m b ( 1 ) r l r 2 l + r S 2 , λ ( m , l ) S 2 , λ ( b , r ) ( 1 ) a 1 a , λ a ! .

Conversely, assume that M n ( x ) = l = 0 n a n , l d l , λ ( x ) . Then, by (17), we obtain

(56) a n , l = 1 l ! ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) t l M n ( x ) λ = m = 0 n k = 0 m n m 2 m m n m S 1 , λ ( m , k ) 1 l ! ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) t l ( x ) k , λ λ = m = 0 n k = 0 m n m k l 2 m m n m S 1 , λ ( m , k ) 1 l ! ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( x ) k l , λ λ = m = 0 n n m 2 m m n m S 1 , λ ( m , l ) + m = 0 n k = l + 1 m n m k l 2 m m n m S 1 , λ ( m , k ) ( ( 1 ) k l , λ ( k l ) ( 1 ) k l 1 , λ ) .

By (54) and (56), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.8

For each nonnegative integer n, we have

d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n m = l n b = 0 n m r = 0 b n m n m b ( 1 ) r l r 2 l + r S 2 , λ ( m , l ) S 2 , λ ( b , r ) d n m b , λ M l ( x ) = l = 0 n m = l n b = 0 n m r = 0 b a = 0 n m b n m n m b ( 1 ) r l r 2 l + r S 2 , λ ( m , l ) S 2 , λ ( b , r ) ( 1 ) a 1 a , λ a ! M l ( x ) .

M n ( x ) = l = 0 n m = 0 n n m 2 m m n m S 1 , λ ( m , l ) + m = 0 n k = l + 1 m n m k l 2 m m n m S 1 , λ ( m , k ) ( ( 1 ) k l , λ ( k l ) ( 1 ) k l 1 , λ ) d l , λ ( x ) .

The degenerate Frobenius-Euler polynomials of order α , α { 0 } N , are defined by the generating function to be

(57) 1 u e λ ( t ) u α e λ x ( t ) = n = 0 h n , λ ( α ) ( x u ) t n n ! (see [33,34]) .

When x = 0 , h n , λ ( α ) ( u ) = h n , λ ( α ) ( u 0 ) are called the degenerate Frobenius-Euler numbers. By (57), we see that

h n , λ ( α ) ( x u ) e λ ( t ) u 1 u α , t λ .

Note that

(58) e λ ( t ) u 1 u α = 1 ( 1 u ) α ( ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) + ( 1 u ) ) α = 1 ( 1 u ) α r = 0 α α r ( 1 u ) α r ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) r = r = 0 α ( α ) r ( 1 u ) r 1 r ! ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) r = r = 0 α a = r ( α ) r ( 1 u ) r S 2 , λ ( a , r ) t a a ! .

By (58), we obtain

(59) a n , l = 1 l ! e λ ( t ) u 1 u α ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) t l ( x ) n , λ λ = n l 1 ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) e λ ( t ) u 1 u α ( x ) n l , λ λ = m = 0 n l n l n l m d m , λ e λ ( t ) u 1 u α ( x ) n l m , λ λ = m = 0 n l r = 0 α n l n l m ( α ) r ( 1 u ) r S 2 , λ ( n l m , r ) d m , λ ,

and by (19) and (59), we have

(60) a n , l = m = 0 n l r = 0 α b = 0 m n l n l m S 2 , λ ( n l m , r ) ( α ) r ( 1 ) b 1 b , λ ( 1 u ) r b ! .

Conversely, assume that h n , λ ( α ) ( x u ) = l = 0 n a n , l d l , λ ( x ) . Then

(61) a n , l = 1 l ! ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) e λ ( t ) u 1 u α t l ( x ) n , λ λ = n l 1 u e λ ( t ) u α ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( x ) n l , λ λ = m = 0 n l n l n l m h m , λ ( α ) ( u ) ( 1 t ) e λ ( t ) ( x ) n l m , λ λ = n l h n l , λ ( α ) ( u ) + m = 0 n l 1 n l n l m h m , λ ( α ) ( u ) ( ( 1 ) n l m , λ ( n l m ) ( 1 ) n l m 1 , λ ) .

By (59) and (61), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 2.9

For each nonnegative integer n, we have

d n , λ ( x ) = l = 0 n m = 0 n l r = 0 α n l n l m ( α ) r ( 1 u ) r S 2 , λ ( n l m , r ) d m , λ h l , λ ( α ) ( x ) = l = 0 n m = 0 n l r = 0 α b = 0 m n l n l m S 2 , λ ( n l m , r ) ( α ) r ( 1 ) b 1 b , λ ( 1 u ) r b ! h l , λ ( α ) ( x ) .

h n , λ ( α ) ( x ) = l = 0 n n l h n l , λ ( α ) ( u ) + m = 0 n l 1 n l n l m h m , λ ( α ) ( u ) ( ( 1 ) n l m , λ ( n l m ) ( 1 ) n l m 1 , λ ) d l , λ ( x ) .

Remark 2.10

Since lim λ 0 e λ x ( t ) = e x t , lim λ 0 d n , λ ( x ) = d n ( x ) , lim λ 0 β n , λ ( x ) = B n ( x ) , lim λ 0 E n , λ = E n ( x ) , lim λ 0 D n , λ ( x ) = D n ( x ) , and lim λ 0 Bel n , λ ( x ) = Bel n ( x ) , where B n ( x ) , E n ( x ) , D n ( x ) , and Bel n ( x ) are the ordinary Bernoulli polynomials, Euler polynomials, Daehee polynomials, and Bell polynomials, respectively. If we take all the degenerate special functions in this article to λ 0 , then we obtain the interesting identities which are mentioned in [35,36].

In addition, Kim found relationships between degenerate Lah-Bell polynomials and another degenerate special functions. In this article, we found the relationships between degenerate derangement polynomials and degenerate Lah-Bell polynomials.

3 Conclusion

Derangement numbers are one of the important and widely covered fiel in various fields such as combinatorics, applied mathematics, and engineering.

One of the important tools to study the properties of special polynomials is the umbral calculus, which are built a completely rigid foundation for theories, based on relatively modern ideas of linear functions and linear operators by Gian-Carlo Rota in 1970s. In particular, Kim-Kim defined λ -umbral calculus with degenerate Sheffer sequences, λ -Sheffer sequence, a family of λ -linear functionals, and λ -differential operators in [17].

In this article, we investigated the relationships between degenerate derangement polynomials and some special polynomials, which are λ -falling polynomials, degenerate Bernoulli polynomials, degenerate Euler polynomials, degenerate Daehee polynomials, Changhee polynomials, degenerate Bell polynomials, degenerate Lah-Bell polynomials, Mittag-Leffer polynomials, and degenerate Frobenius-Euler polynomials of order α by using λ -umbral calculus, and derived some interesting identities of those polynomials.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the referees for their valuable and detailed comments, which have significantly improved the presentation of this article.

  1. Funding information: This research was supported by the Daegu University Research Grant, 2022.

  2. Author contributions: JWP conceived of the framework, and all authors wrote the manuscript; SJY checked the results of the papers. All authors read and approved the final paper.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.

  5. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during this study.

References

[1] L. Comtet, Advanced Combinatorics: The Aart of Finite and Infinite Expansions, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, 1974. Search in Google Scholar

[2] T. Kim, D. S. Kim, H. Lee, and L. C. Jang, A note on degenerate derangement polynomials and numbers, AIMS Math. 6 (2021), 6469–6481. 10.3934/math.2021380Search in Google Scholar

[3] J. Quaintance and H. W. Gould, Combinatorial Identities for Stirling Numbers, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, Singapore, 2016. 10.1142/9821Search in Google Scholar

[4] F. Qi, J. L. Zhao, and B. N. Guo, Closed forms for derangement numbers in terms of the Hessenberg determinants, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM. 112 (2018), no. 4, 933–944. 10.1007/s13398-017-0401-zSearch in Google Scholar

[5] C. Wang, P. Misaka, and I. Mezo, The r-derangement numbers, Discrete Math. 340 (2017), no. 7, 1681–1692. 10.1016/j.disc.2016.10.012Search in Google Scholar

[6] R. J. Clarke and M. Sved, The Derangements and Bell numbers, Math. Mag. 66 (1993), no. 5, 299–303. 10.1080/0025570X.1993.11996148Search in Google Scholar

[7] K. S. Briggs and J. B. Remmel, A p,q-analogue of the generalized derangement numbers, Ann. Comb. 13 (2009), no. 1, 1–25. 10.1007/s00026-009-0010-4Search in Google Scholar

[8] L. Carlitz, Degenerate Stirling, Bernoulli and Eulerian numbers, Util. Math. 15 (1979), 51–88. Search in Google Scholar

[9] W. A. Khan, J. Younis, and M. Nadeem, Construction of partially degenerate Laguerre-Bernoulli polynomials of the first kind, Appl. Math. Sci. Eng. 30 (2022), no. 1, 362–375. 10.1080/27690911.2022.2079641Search in Google Scholar

[10] T. Kim, D. S. Kim, H. K. Kim, and H. Lee, Some properties on degenerate Fubini polynomials, Appl. Math. Sci. Eng. 30 (2022), no. 1, 235–248. 10.1080/27690911.2022.2056169Search in Google Scholar

[11] J. Kwon, P. Wongsason, Y. Kim, and D. Kim, Representations of modified type 2 degenerate poly-Bernoulli polynomials, AIMS Math. 7 (2022), no. 6, 11443–11463. 10.3934/math.2022638Search in Google Scholar

[12] W. A. Khan, R. Ai, K. A. H. Alzobydi, and N. Ahmed, New family of degenerate poly-Genocchi polynomials with its certain properties, J. Funct. Spaces. 2021 (2021), Art. ID 6660517, 8 pp. 10.1155/2021/6660517Search in Google Scholar

[13] H. K. Kim and W. A. Khan, Some identities of a new type of degenerate poly-Frobenius-Euler polynomials and numbers, Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 24, (2021), no. 1, 33–45. Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. Acikgoz and U. Duran, Unified degenerate central Bell polynomials, J. Math. Anal. 11 (2020), no. 2, 18–33. 10.20944/preprints201908.0213.v1Search in Google Scholar

[15] T. Kim, A note on degenerate Stirling polynomials of the second kind, Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 20 (2017), no. 3, 319–331. Search in Google Scholar

[16] D. S. Kim, T. Kim, and G. W. Jang, A note on degenerate Stirling numbers of the first kind, Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 21 (2018), no. 3, 393–404. Search in Google Scholar

[17] D. S. Kim and T. Kim, Degenerate Sheffer sequences and λ -Sheffer sequences, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 493 (2021), 124521, 21 pp. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2020.124521Search in Google Scholar

[18] K. S. Nisar, Umbral Calculus, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH & Co. KG, Germany, 2012. Search in Google Scholar

[19] S. Roman, The Umbral Calculus, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 2005. Search in Google Scholar

[20] S. Araci, M. Acikgoz, T. Diagana, and H. M. Srivastavav, A novel approach for obtaining new identities for the λ extension of q-Euler polynomials arising from the q-umbral calculus, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 10 (2017), no. 4, 1316–1325. 10.22436/jnsa.010.04.03Search in Google Scholar

[21] R. Dere and Y. Simsek, Applications of umbral algebra to some special polynomials, Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 22 (2012), no. 3, 433–438. Search in Google Scholar

[22] H. Kim, Degenerate Lah-Bell polynomials arising from degenerate Sheffer sequences, Adv. Differential Equations. 2020 (2020), Paper no. 687, 16 pp. Search in Google Scholar

[23] T. Kim and D. S. Kim, Some identities of Catalan-Daehee polynomials arising from umbral calculus, Appl. Comput. Math. 16 (2017), no. 2, 177–189. Search in Google Scholar

[24] T. Kim, D. S. Kim, D. V. Dolgy, and J. W. Park, On the type 2 poly-Bernoulli polynomials associated with umbral calculus, Open Math. 19 (2021), no. 1, 878–887. 10.1515/math-2021-0086Search in Google Scholar

[25] Y. Simsek, Special numbers and polynomials including their generating functions in umbral analysis methods, Axioms 7 (2018), 22. 10.3390/axioms7020022Search in Google Scholar

[26] D. Lim, Degenerate, partially degenerate and totally degenerate Daehee numbers and polynomials, Adv. Difference Equ. 2015 (2015), 287, 9 pp. 10.1186/s13662-015-0624-2Search in Google Scholar

[27] S. J. Yun and J. W. Park, On fully degenerate Daehee numbers and polynomials of the second kind, J. Math. 2020 (2020), Art. ID 7893498, 9 pp. 10.1155/2020/7893498Search in Google Scholar

[28] H. I. Kwon, T. Kim, and J. J. Seo, A note on degenerate Changhee numbers and polynomials, Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 18 (2015), no. 3, 295–305. Search in Google Scholar

[29] S. H. Rim, J. W. Park, S. S. Pyo, and J. Kwon, The nth twisted Changhee polynomials and numbers, Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 18 (2015), no. 3, 295–305. 10.4134/BKMS.2015.52.3.741Search in Google Scholar

[30] T. Kim and D. S. Kim, Degenerate polyexponential functions and degenerate Bell polynomials, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 487 (2020), no. 2, 124017, 15 pp. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2020.124017Search in Google Scholar

[31] S. Tauber, Lah numbers for Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials, Fibonacci Quart. 6 (1968), no. 5, 93–99. Search in Google Scholar

[32] D. S. Kim and T. Kim, Lah-Bell numbers and polynomials, Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 23 (2020), no. 4, 577–586. 10.1186/s13662-020-03152-4Search in Google Scholar

[33] J. Choi, D. S. Kim, T. Kim, and Y. H. Kim, A note on some identities of Frobeniu-Euler numbers and polynomials, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2012 (2012), Art. ID 861797, 9 pp. 10.1155/2012/861797Search in Google Scholar

[34] T. Kim and T. Mansour, Umbral calculus associated with Frobenius-type Eulerian polynomials, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 21 (2014), no. 4, 484–493. 10.1134/S1061920814040062Search in Google Scholar

[35] T. Kim, D. S. Kim, G. W. Jang, and J. Kwon, A note on some identities of derangement polynomials, J. Inequal. Appl. 2018 (2018), Paper no. 40, 17 pp. 10.1186/s13660-018-1636-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[36] Y. Ma, D. S. Kim, T. Kim, H. Kim, and H. Lee, Someidentities of Lah-Bell polynomials, Adv. Difference Equ. 2020 (2020), Paper no. 510, 10 pp. 10.1186/s13662-020-02966-6Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-10-01
Revised: 2023-04-22
Accepted: 2023-05-02
Published Online: 2023-06-15

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. A novel class of bipolar soft separation axioms concerning crisp points
  3. Duality for convolution on subclasses of analytic functions and weighted integral operators
  4. Existence of a solution to an infinite system of weighted fractional integral equations of a function with respect to another function via a measure of noncompactness
  5. On the existence of nonnegative radial solutions for Dirichlet exterior problems on the Heisenberg group
  6. Hyers-Ulam stability of isometries on bounded domains-II
  7. Asymptotic study of Leray solution of 3D-Navier-Stokes equations with exponential damping
  8. Semi-Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability for an integro-differential equation of order 𝓃
  9. Jordan triple (α,β)-higher ∗-derivations on semiprime rings
  10. The asymptotic behaviors of solutions for higher-order (m1, m2)-coupled Kirchhoff models with nonlinear strong damping
  11. Approximation of the image of the Lp ball under Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator
  12. Best proximity points in -metric spaces with applications
  13. Approximation spaces inspired by subset rough neighborhoods with applications
  14. A numerical Haar wavelet-finite difference hybrid method and its convergence for nonlinear hyperbolic partial differential equation
  15. A novel conservative numerical approximation scheme for the Rosenau-Kawahara equation
  16. Fekete-Szegö functional for a class of non-Bazilevic functions related to quasi-subordination
  17. On local fractional integral inequalities via generalized ( h ˜ 1 , h ˜ 2 ) -preinvexity involving local fractional integral operators with Mittag-Leffler kernel
  18. On some geometric results for generalized k-Bessel functions
  19. Convergence analysis of M-iteration for 𝒢-nonexpansive mappings with directed graphs applicable in image deblurring and signal recovering problems
  20. Some results of homogeneous expansions for a class of biholomorphic mappings defined on a Reinhardt domain in ℂn
  21. Graded weakly 1-absorbing primary ideals
  22. The existence and uniqueness of solutions to a functional equation arising in psychological learning theory
  23. Some aspects of the n-ary orthogonal and b(αn,βn)-best approximations of b(αn,βn)-hypermetric spaces over Banach algebras
  24. Numerical solution of a malignant invasion model using some finite difference methods
  25. Increasing property and logarithmic convexity of functions involving Dirichlet lambda function
  26. Feature fusion-based text information mining method for natural scenes
  27. Global optimum solutions for a system of (k, ψ)-Hilfer fractional differential equations: Best proximity point approach
  28. The study of solutions for several systems of PDDEs with two complex variables
  29. Regularity criteria via horizontal component of velocity for the Boussinesq equations in anisotropic Lorentz spaces
  30. Generalized Stević-Sharma operators from the minimal Möbius invariant space into Bloch-type spaces
  31. On initial value problem for elliptic equation on the plane under Caputo derivative
  32. A dimension expanded preconditioning technique for block two-by-two linear equations
  33. Asymptotic behavior of Fréchet functional equation and some characterizations of inner product spaces
  34. Small perturbations of critical nonlocal equations with variable exponents
  35. Dynamical property of hyperspace on uniform space
  36. Some notes on graded weakly 1-absorbing primary ideals
  37. On the problem of detecting source points acting on a fluid
  38. Integral transforms involving a generalized k-Bessel function
  39. Ruled real hypersurfaces in the complex hyperbolic quadric
  40. On the monotonic properties and oscillatory behavior of solutions of neutral differential equations
  41. Approximate multi-variable bi-Jensen-type mappings
  42. Mixed-type SP-iteration for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in hyperbolic spaces
  43. On the equation fn + (f″)m ≡ 1
  44. Results on the modified degenerate Laplace-type integral associated with applications involving fractional kinetic equations
  45. Characterizations of entire solutions for the system of Fermat-type binomial and trinomial shift equations in ℂn#
  46. Commentary
  47. On I. Meghea and C. S. Stamin review article “Remarks on some variants of minimal point theorem and Ekeland variational principle with applications,” Demonstratio Mathematica 2022; 55: 354–379
  48. Special Issue on Fixed Point Theory and Applications to Various Differential/Integral Equations - Part II
  49. On Cauchy problem for pseudo-parabolic equation with Caputo-Fabrizio operator
  50. Fixed-point results for convex orbital operators
  51. Asymptotic stability of equilibria for difference equations via fixed points of enriched Prešić operators
  52. Asymptotic behavior of resolvents of equilibrium problems on complete geodesic spaces
  53. A system of additive functional equations in complex Banach algebras
  54. New inertial forward–backward algorithm for convex minimization with applications
  55. Uniqueness of solutions for a ψ-Hilfer fractional integral boundary value problem with the p-Laplacian operator
  56. Analysis of Cauchy problem with fractal-fractional differential operators
  57. Common best proximity points for a pair of mappings with certain dominating property
  58. Investigation of hybrid fractional q-integro-difference equations supplemented with nonlocal q-integral boundary conditions
  59. The structure of fuzzy fractals generated by an orbital fuzzy iterated function system
  60. On the structure of self-affine Jordan arcs in ℝ2
  61. Solvability for a system of Hadamard-type hybrid fractional differential inclusions
  62. Three solutions for discrete anisotropic Kirchhoff-type problems
  63. On split generalized equilibrium problem with multiple output sets and common fixed points problem
  64. Special Issue on Computational and Numerical Methods for Special Functions - Part II
  65. Sandwich-type results regarding Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of q-hypergeometric function
  66. Certain aspects of Nörlund -statistical convergence of sequences in neutrosophic normed spaces
  67. On completeness of weak eigenfunctions for multi-interval Sturm-Liouville equations with boundary-interface conditions
  68. Some identities on generalized harmonic numbers and generalized harmonic functions
  69. Study of degenerate derangement polynomials by λ-umbral calculus
  70. Normal ordering associated with λ-Stirling numbers in λ-shift algebra
  71. Analytical and numerical analysis of damped harmonic oscillator model with nonlocal operators
  72. Compositions of positive integers with 2s and 3s
  73. Kinematic-geometry of a line trajectory and the invariants of the axodes
  74. Hahn Laplace transform and its applications
  75. Discrete complementary exponential and sine integral functions
  76. Special Issue on Recent Methods in Approximation Theory - Part II
  77. On the order of approximation by modified summation-integral-type operators based on two parameters
  78. Bernstein-type operators on elliptic domain and their interpolation properties
  79. A class of strongly convergent subgradient extragradient methods for solving quasimonotone variational inequalities
  80. Special Issue on Recent Advances in Fractional Calculus and Nonlinear Fractional Evaluation Equations - Part II
  81. Application of fractional quantum calculus on coupled hybrid differential systems within the sequential Caputo fractional q-derivatives
  82. On some conformable boundary value problems in the setting of a new generalized conformable fractional derivative
  83. A certain class of fractional difference equations with damping: Oscillatory properties
  84. Weighted Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for r-times differentiable preinvex functions for k-fractional integrals
  85. Special Issue on Recent Advances for Computational and Mathematical Methods in Scientific Problems - Part II
  86. The behavior of hidden bifurcation in 2D scroll via saturated function series controlled by a coefficient harmonic linearization method
  87. Phase portraits of two classes of quadratic differential systems exhibiting as solutions two cubic algebraic curves
  88. Petri net analysis of a queueing inventory system with orbital search by the server
  89. Asymptotic stability of an epidemiological fractional reaction-diffusion model
  90. On the stability of a strongly stabilizing control for degenerate systems in Hilbert spaces
  91. Special Issue on Application of Fractional Calculus: Mathematical Modeling and Control - Part I
  92. New conticrete inequalities of the Hermite-Hadamard-Jensen-Mercer type in terms of generalized conformable fractional operators via majorization
  93. Pell-Lucas polynomials for numerical treatment of the nonlinear fractional-order Duffing equation
  94. Impacts of Brownian motion and fractional derivative on the solutions of the stochastic fractional Davey-Stewartson equations
  95. Some results on fractional Hahn difference boundary value problems
  96. Properties of a subclass of analytic functions defined by Riemann-Liouville fractional integral applied to convolution product of multiplier transformation and Ruscheweyh derivative
  97. Special Issue on Development of Fuzzy Sets and Their Extensions - Part I
  98. The cross-border e-commerce platform selection based on the probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy generalized dice similarity measures
  99. Comparison of fuzzy and crisp decision matrices: An evaluation on PROBID and sPROBID multi-criteria decision-making methods
  100. Rejection and symmetric difference of bipolar picture fuzzy graph
Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dema-2022-0240/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button