Home Comparing the thermodynamic behaviour of Al(l) + ZrO2(4% Y2O3) and Al(l) + Al2O3
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Comparing the thermodynamic behaviour of Al(l) + ZrO2(4% Y2O3) and Al(l) + Al2O3

  • Evan Copland EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 12, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Author Information
International Journal of Materials Research
From the journal International Journal of Materials Research Volume 97 Issue 8

Abstract

In an effort to better determine the thermodynamic properties of Al(g) and Al2O(g) the vapour in equilibrium with Al(l) + 4 at.% yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) was compared to the vapour in equilibrium with Al(l) + Al2O3(s) over the temperature range 1197 – 1509 K. This comparison was made directly by Knudsen effusion-cell mass spectrometry with an instrument configured for a multiple effusion-cell vapour source (multi-cell KEMS). Second-law enthalpies of vaporization of Al(g) and Al2O(g) together with activity measurements show that Al(l) + YSZ is thermodynamically equivalent to Al(l) + Al2O3(s), indicating that Al(l) remained pure and Al2O3(s) was present in the YSZ-cell. Subsequent observation of the Al(l)/YSZ and vapour/YSZ interfaces revealed a thin Al2O3-layer had formed, separating the YSZ-cell from Al(l) and Al(g) + Al2O(g), effectively transforming it into an Al2O3 effusion-cell. This behaviour agreed with observations made for β-NiAl(Pt) alloys measured in YSZ effusion-cell.

Keywords: KEMS; Thermodynamic; property measurements; Al(g); Al2O(g); Al– Zr –O system
Dr. Evan Copland NASA-Glenn Research Center 21000 Brookpark Rd. Mail Stop 106-1, Cleveland, Ohio 44135, USA Tel.: +1 216 433 3738 Fax: +1 216 433 5544

  1. The help of Brian Gleeson, David Young and Christian Chatillon is gratefully acknowledged. The funding for this work came from NASA Glenn Research Center's Low Emission Alternative Power Project. Analysis of the reaction products at the Al(l)/YSZ interfaces was performed by James Smith, at NASA Glenn Research Center.

References

[1] E. Copland, in: E. Opila, J. Fergus, T. Maruyama, J. Mizusaki, T. Narita, D. Shifler, E.Wuchina (Eds.), High Temperature Corrosion and Materials Chemistry, V, The Electrochemical Society, Pennington, NJ (2005).Search in Google Scholar

[2] E. Copland: NASA Report, NASA/CR-2005-211330 (2005).Search in Google Scholar

[3] M. Inghram, J. Drowart, in: High Temperature Technology, Oct 6–9 (1959) 338.Search in Google Scholar

[4] A. Büchler, J. Stauffer, in: Thermodynamics (IAEAVienna, 1966) 1, 271.Search in Google Scholar

[5] C. Chatillon, C. Senillou, M. Allibert, A. Pattoret: Rev. Sci. Instrum. 47 (1976) 334.10.1063/1.1134618Search in Google Scholar

[6] P. Morland, C. Chatillon, P. Rocabois: High Temp. Mat. Sci. 37 (1997) 167.Search in Google Scholar

[7] C. Chatillion, L. Malheiros, P. Rocabois, M. Jeymond: High Temp. High Pressures (2002) 213.10.1068/htjr021Search in Google Scholar

[8] H. Wriedt: Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams 6 (1985).10.1007/BF02887159Search in Google Scholar

[9] L.V. Gurvich, I.V. Veyts, C.B. Alcock, in: Thermodynamic Properties of Individual Substances, English Version, Begell House (1996).Search in Google Scholar

[10] J. Cox, D. Wagman, V. Medvedev: CODATA Key Values for Thermodynamics, Hemisphere Publishing Corp. Washington (1988).Search in Google Scholar

[11] M.W. Chase: NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables, 4th Ed., American Chemical Society (1998).Search in Google Scholar

[12] L. Brewer, A. Searcy: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 73 (1951) 5308.10.1021/ja01155a090Search in Google Scholar

[13] R. Porter, P. Schissel, M. Inghram: J. Chem. Phys. 23 (1955) 339.10.1063/1.1741963Search in Google Scholar

[14] J. Drowart, G. DeMaria, R. Burns, M. Inghram: J. Chem. Phys. 32 (1960) 1366.10.1063/1.1730923Search in Google Scholar

[15] O. Fabrichnaya, F. Aldinger: Z. Metallkd. 95 (2004) 27.10.3139/146.017909Search in Google Scholar

[16] S. Lakiza, L. Lopato: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80 (1997) 893.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02919.xSearch in Google Scholar

[17] R.C. Paule, J. Mandel: Analysis of Interlaboratory Measurements on the Vapor Pressure of Gold, SRM 745, National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 260-19 (1970); Pure and Applied Chem. 31 (1972) 371.10.1351/pac197231030371Search in Google Scholar

[18] E. Copland: J. Chem. Thermodynamics. 38 (2006) 443.10.1016/j.jct.2005.06.014Search in Google Scholar

[19] M. Rother, H. Holleck: J. Chim. Phys.-Chim. Biol. 90 (1993) 333.10.1051/jcp/1993900333Search in Google Scholar

[20] C.H.P. Lupis, Chemical Thermodynamics of Materials, North-Holland, New-York (1983).Search in Google Scholar

[21] O. Herstad, K. Motzfeldt: Rev. Hautes Tempér. et Réfract. 3 (1966) 291.Search in Google Scholar

[22] D. Bhogeswara, K. Motzfeldt: Acta Chem. Scand. 24 (1970) 2796.10.3891/acta.chem.scand.24-2796Search in Google Scholar
Received: 2005-01-31
Accepted: 2006-05-22
Published Online: 2022-01-12

© 2006 Carl Hanser Verlag, München

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Contents
  2. Extended editorial with anecdotes
  3. Anelastic relaxation and structure of ternary Fe–Al–Me alloys with Me = Co, Cr, Ge, Mn, Nb, Si, Ta, Ti, Zr
  4. Kinetic study of the β → α + γ transformation reaction in a CuZnAl alloy
  5. Calorimetric investigation of the binary Cu–In system
  6. Thermodynamic properties of liquid Cu–In–Zn alloys
  7. Comparing the thermodynamic behaviour of Al(l) + ZrO2(4% Y2O3) and Al(l) + Al2O3
  8. Failure-mode dependence of the strengthening effect in Ti3AlC2/10 vol.% Al2O3 composite
  9. Investigation of Cu-graphite composites prepared by electroforming
  10. Neutron diffraction analysis of martensite ageing in high-carbon FeCMnSi steel
  11. Effect of reinforcement size hybridization on the wear properties of SiCp/Cu Composites
  12. Temperature dependence of lattice mismatch and γ′ volume fraction of a fourth-generation monocrystalline nickel-based superalloy
  13. Novel combinatorial microstructures in Ti-6Al-4V alloy achieved by an electric-current-pulse treatment
  14. The Effect of Ti–B and Sr on the mechanical behaviour of the Zinc–Aluminum-based ZA-12 alloy produced by gravity casting
  15. Determination of retained austenite in multiphase steels by magnetic force microscopy
  16. Filtration resistance during pressure filtration tests of liquid aluminium alloys
  17. Microstructure of a Damascene sabre after annealing
  18. Effect of tin added to the zinc bath on the formation and the microstructure of hot-dip galvanized coatings
  19. Personal
  20. Conferences
  21. Contents
  22. Editorial
  23. Extended editorial with anecdotes
  24. Basic
  25. Anelastic relaxation and structure of ternary Fe–Al–Me alloys with Me = Co, Cr, Ge, Mn, Nb, Si, Ta, Ti, Zr
  26. Kinetic study of the β → α + γ transformation reaction in a CuZnAl alloy
  27. Calorimetric investigation of the binary Cu–In system
  28. Thermodynamic properties of liquid Cu–In–Zn alloys
  29. Comparing the thermodynamic behaviour of Al(l) + ZrO2(4% Y2O3) and Al(l) + Al2O3
  30. Failure-mode dependence of the strengthening effect in Ti3AlC2/10 vol.% Al2O3 composite
  31. Investigation of Cu-graphite composites prepared by electroforming
  32. Neutron diffraction analysis of martensite ageing in high-carbon FeCMnSi steel
  33. Applied
  34. Effect of reinforcement size hybridization on the wear properties of SiCp/Cu Composites
  35. Temperature dependence of lattice mismatch and γ′ volume fraction of a fourth-generation monocrystalline nickel-based superalloy
  36. Novel combinatorial microstructures in Ti-6Al-4V alloy achieved by an electric-current-pulse treatment
  37. The Effect of Ti–B and Sr on the mechanical behaviour of the Zinc–Aluminum-based ZA-12 alloy produced by gravity casting
  38. Determination of retained austenite in multiphase steels by magnetic force microscopy
  39. Filtration resistance during pressure filtration tests of liquid aluminium alloys
  40. Microstructure of a Damascene sabre after annealing
  41. Effect of tin added to the zinc bath on the formation and the microstructure of hot-dip galvanized coatings
  42. Notifications
  43. Personal
  44. Conferences
https://doi.org/10.3139/ijmr-2006-0174
Keywords for this article
KEMS; Thermodynamic; property measurements; Al(g); Al2O(g); Al– Zr –O system

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Contents
  2. Extended editorial with anecdotes
  3. Anelastic relaxation and structure of ternary Fe–Al–Me alloys with Me = Co, Cr, Ge, Mn, Nb, Si, Ta, Ti, Zr
  4. Kinetic study of the β → α + γ transformation reaction in a CuZnAl alloy
  5. Calorimetric investigation of the binary Cu–In system
  6. Thermodynamic properties of liquid Cu–In–Zn alloys
  7. Comparing the thermodynamic behaviour of Al(l) + ZrO2(4% Y2O3) and Al(l) + Al2O3
  8. Failure-mode dependence of the strengthening effect in Ti3AlC2/10 vol.% Al2O3 composite
  9. Investigation of Cu-graphite composites prepared by electroforming
  10. Neutron diffraction analysis of martensite ageing in high-carbon FeCMnSi steel
  11. Effect of reinforcement size hybridization on the wear properties of SiCp/Cu Composites
  12. Temperature dependence of lattice mismatch and γ′ volume fraction of a fourth-generation monocrystalline nickel-based superalloy
  13. Novel combinatorial microstructures in Ti-6Al-4V alloy achieved by an electric-current-pulse treatment
  14. The Effect of Ti–B and Sr on the mechanical behaviour of the Zinc–Aluminum-based ZA-12 alloy produced by gravity casting
  15. Determination of retained austenite in multiphase steels by magnetic force microscopy
  16. Filtration resistance during pressure filtration tests of liquid aluminium alloys
  17. Microstructure of a Damascene sabre after annealing
  18. Effect of tin added to the zinc bath on the formation and the microstructure of hot-dip galvanized coatings
  19. Personal
  20. Conferences
  21. Contents
  22. Editorial
  23. Extended editorial with anecdotes
  24. Basic
  25. Anelastic relaxation and structure of ternary Fe–Al–Me alloys with Me = Co, Cr, Ge, Mn, Nb, Si, Ta, Ti, Zr
  26. Kinetic study of the β → α + γ transformation reaction in a CuZnAl alloy
  27. Calorimetric investigation of the binary Cu–In system
  28. Thermodynamic properties of liquid Cu–In–Zn alloys
  29. Comparing the thermodynamic behaviour of Al(l) + ZrO2(4% Y2O3) and Al(l) + Al2O3
  30. Failure-mode dependence of the strengthening effect in Ti3AlC2/10 vol.% Al2O3 composite
  31. Investigation of Cu-graphite composites prepared by electroforming
  32. Neutron diffraction analysis of martensite ageing in high-carbon FeCMnSi steel
  33. Applied
  34. Effect of reinforcement size hybridization on the wear properties of SiCp/Cu Composites
  35. Temperature dependence of lattice mismatch and γ′ volume fraction of a fourth-generation monocrystalline nickel-based superalloy
  36. Novel combinatorial microstructures in Ti-6Al-4V alloy achieved by an electric-current-pulse treatment
  37. The Effect of Ti–B and Sr on the mechanical behaviour of the Zinc–Aluminum-based ZA-12 alloy produced by gravity casting
  38. Determination of retained austenite in multiphase steels by magnetic force microscopy
  39. Filtration resistance during pressure filtration tests of liquid aluminium alloys
  40. Microstructure of a Damascene sabre after annealing
  41. Effect of tin added to the zinc bath on the formation and the microstructure of hot-dip galvanized coatings
  42. Notifications
  43. Personal
  44. Conferences
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 25.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/ijmr-2006-0174/html
Scroll to top button