Abstract
Densely interconnected, nonlinear, and reconfigurable optical networks represent a route to high-performance optical computing, communications, and sensing technologies. Dielectric nanoantennas are promising building blocks for such architectures since they can precisely control optical diffraction. However, they are traditionally limited in their nonlinear and reconfigurable responses owing to their relatively low-quality factor (Q-factor). Here, we highlight new and emerging design strategies to increase the Q-factor while maintaining control of optical diffraction, enabling unprecedented spatial and temporal control of light. We describe how multipolar modes and bound states in the continuum increase Q and show how these high-Q nanoantennas can be cascaded to create almost limitless resonant optical transfer functions. With high-Q nanoantennas, new paradigms in reconfigurable wavefront-shaping, low-noise, multiplexed biosensors and quantum transduction are possible.
1 Introduction
Networks lie at the heart of both natural and engineered systems. The useful information density of a network scales with both the number of elements and, importantly, the number of connections. For optimal optical communications networks, considerable effort has been devoted to miniaturizing photonic components, in order to increase the number of elements in the network. Such progress is akin to the semiconductor industry’s strides in miniaturizing transistors to increase the power of digital computers. However, unlike electronic chip design, optical engineering is bound by the diffraction limit; plasmonic components have promised to overcome this limit [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] but generally suffer from strong absorption. Here, we describe an alternate strategy for scaling photonic networks: increasing the number of connections between wavelength-scale components (i.e., components at the diffraction limit), thereby performing highly sophisticated operations. Though the diffraction limit sets a bound on the number of optical elements that can be included in the network, there is no limit on the number of diffracted channels. With this in mind, can we construct highly efficient compound optical devices with nanoantennas? And more importantly, can we dynamically modify their operation in time with electro-optic or nonlinear effects? We believe such photonic networks are possible with high-quality-factor (high-Q) nanoantennas and metasurfaces.
Dielectric nanoantennas, or multipolar Mie resonators, represent ideal diffraction-limited optical elements for generating, manipulating, and modulating light waves (Figure 1i). These nanoantennas act as quasi-point sources whose scattering can be understood, much like atoms and molecules, as a superposition of electric and magnetic multipolar modes [10]. The electric and magnetic modes of nanoantennas present a library of available scattering or radiation patterns that can be combined spatially to perform nearly arbitrary transformations to the incident light [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. One drawback of Mie resonators is that light typically only interacts with them over a few hundred femtoseconds. Combined with the usually very weak light-matter coupling strengths at the material level, this fleeting interaction often limits such devices to passive applications; consequently, generating efficient and active nanoantennas is an active area of research [18], [19], [20].
![Figure 1: Landscape of dielectric nanophotonic structures for temporal and spatial control of light. From left to right: Conventional Mie resonator used for wavefront shaping in metasurfaces. Higher order multipoles increase the quality factor, at the expense of more complex radiation patterns. Interfering Mie-like and Fabry-Perot–like resonances increases the quality factor compared to dipole resonances, forming a quasi-bound state in the continuum (Q value from the study by Koshelev et al. [31]). Utilizing one translational degree of freedom, coupling to guided mode resonances within a nanoantenna can generate high-Q dipolar-like resonances for wavefront shaping, with a quality factor tuned independently of the metasurface transfer function (Q value taken from the study by Lawrence et al. [30]). Photonic crystal defect nanocavities increase the Q to 106 using photonic mirrors but lose the ability to controllably shape far-field radiation (Q from the study by Quan and Loncar [49]). Photonic crystals with two spatial degrees of freedom generate ultrahigh-quality factors whose resonant diffraction is geometrically set (Q from the study by Jin et al. [50]).](/document/doi/10.1515/nanoph-2020-0510/asset/graphic/j_nanoph-2020-0510_fig_001.jpg)
Landscape of dielectric nanophotonic structures for temporal and spatial control of light. From left to right: Conventional Mie resonator used for wavefront shaping in metasurfaces. Higher order multipoles increase the quality factor, at the expense of more complex radiation patterns. Interfering Mie-like and Fabry-Perot–like resonances increases the quality factor compared to dipole resonances, forming a quasi-bound state in the continuum (Q value from the study by Koshelev et al. [31]). Utilizing one translational degree of freedom, coupling to guided mode resonances within a nanoantenna can generate high-Q dipolar-like resonances for wavefront shaping, with a quality factor tuned independently of the metasurface transfer function (Q value taken from the study by Lawrence et al. [30]). Photonic crystal defect nanocavities increase the Q to 106 using photonic mirrors but lose the ability to controllably shape far-field radiation (Q from the study by Quan and Loncar [49]). Photonic crystals with two spatial degrees of freedom generate ultrahigh-quality factors whose resonant diffraction is geometrically set (Q from the study by Jin et al. [50]).
Optical modes appear spectrally as resonances, whose full width at half maximum is inversely proportional to the average lifetime of light within the antenna and local electric field enhancement, important attributes for sensing [21] and nonlinear optics [22], [23]. This lifetime is quantified by the quality factor Q and is composed of various limiting loss mechanisms like radiation loss, material absorption, and fabrication imperfections. The increased lifetime and reduced spectral bandwidth of high-Q resonances are critical to the operation of on-chip photonics. In ring resonators and photonic crystal defect cavities, for example, high-Q modes reduce the required optical or electrical budget for nonlinear optical transformations [24], [25] required for communications technologies. In many ways, these on-chip cavities are the antithesis of Mie scatterers, critically relying on input/output channels being confined to single- or few-mode coupling through a small number of waveguides. By limiting the configurations to 2 or 4 ports and evanescent weak coupling, generating high-quality factors is comparatively easier than in structures that communicate with the entire radiation continuum, such as optical nanoantennas. Therefore, the density of node connections in existing on-chip high-Q cavity designs is extremely limited.
Mie modes are designed with radiation in mind, so their interaction and coupling to free space can be tailored to increase the Q; in parallel, coupling to other antenna modes can be engineered to be as dense as desired. In simple nanophotonic systems, resonant lifetimes tend to increase with multipole order, consistent with a decrease in the angular density of radiation channels and an increased field contribution from large Fourier components (see Figure 1ii). Consequently, the lower order dipolar modes that are commonly used in diffractive metasurface designs necessarily have relatively low quality (Q) factors, of the order ∼10. However, there is no physical limitation preventing much higher quality factors. That is to say, highly resonant dipole-like emitters can exist with proper design. After all, nanoantenna modes consist of both radiative (low momentum) and nonradiative (high momentum) waves. Traditionally, these components are highly correlated, but by carefully addressing their relative contributions, the entire parameter space of optical state variables can potentially be manipulated in both space and time, independently. Previous work has already shown that the superposition of two or more multipoles within a subwavelength object can have profound effects on far-field scattering. For example, tailoring a nanoantenna so as to adjust the relative strength and spectral overlap of its electric and magnetic dipole modes produces highly directional scattering, including zero-backscattering and zero-forward scattering conditions [26], [27], [28]. Generalizing this notion to device designs composed of point-like sources that can controllably release a very small amount of leakage into interesting spatial distributions will allow for simultaneous control of far-field optics, required for high-density integration, and near-field light localization useful for reconfigurability and sensitive signal readouts. This opportunity requires sculpting the three-dimensional (3D) Fourier map of a nanoantenna in order to fully decouple the directionality and strength of radiation loss.
2 Design methodologies for sculpting free-space light with resonant nanoantennas
Achieving resonant, or high Q, scattering in multipolar nanoantennas is an active area of research [29], [30], [31]. Overlapping two or more multipoles (Figure 1iii) whose radiation patterns spatially overlap can lead to strong destructive interference that suppresses far-field scattering and increases the resonance quality factor [31], [32], [33]. The moderate enhancement in lifetime over subwavelength volumes may be useful in nonlinear integrated optics. However, current demonstrations of localized quasi-BICs have relied on the combination of distinct spatial modes. The incomplete cancelation of the multipoles not only places bounds on the achievable Q factor, tied to the intrinsic properties of the uncoupled modes, but it will also be very difficult to engineer the corresponding far-field pattern without affecting the Q factor. Additionally, constraining systems to single antennas may reduce the degrees of freedom available for far-field manipulation. The radiation profiles available to multipolar nanoantennas are intrinsically limited by the destructively interfering modes, requiring particular illumination strategies to couple into and out of the modes of interest. Future metasurface-based devices, for example, will rely on judicious design methodologies that allow spatially varying transfer functions composed of many nanoantennas that operate at the same frequency but with variable phase or amplitude.
Rather than relying on the overlap of multiple modes within a single nanoantenna, the resonant lifetime can be increased by capitalizing on the additional degrees of freedom afforded by periodic structures [34], [35]. Periodic systems composed of subwavelength objects provide opportunities for high-quality-factor transmission or diffraction. Two-dimensionally periodic nanostructures whose band structure contains a flat region can induce light localization [36], [37], [38], although their stability to structural perturbations is limited. Using degrees of freedom like mode polarization, mode type (electric vs. magnetic) [39], spatial symmetry [40], [41], and others, coupling to radiation can be significantly reduced [42]. Otherwise fully bound modes can leak out to their environment, forming a quasi-bound state. Perhaps the most robust method to date in reducing free-space radiation is in photonic crystal membranes (Figure 1vi), where bound states can be created and destroyed in a deterministic manner and ultrahigh-quality factors have been observed [43]. Here, the interplay between multiple spatial degrees of freedom is required to generate the modes of interest. Accordingly, bound modes such as these exist at particular points in k-space that are not easily moved; their utility in the far field is therefore limited. While these designs can generate ultrahigh-quality factors, they are at the expense of limited momentum-space tunability.
Recent results using bound modes with lower dimensionality or nonlocality have begun to combine resonant optical cavities with wavefront shaping [30], [44]. Here, light trapping can occur along one direction, while the scattering in an orthogonal plane can mimic a dipole requisite for phase-gradient metasurfaces (Figure 1iv). Resonant optical responses within the diffraction plane can be decoupled (that is, separately designed) from the light trapping in this configuration. Exciting avenues of exploration exist with this scheme, spanning tunable beam steering, lensing [45], and nonlinear nanophotonics [46]. However, to date, the design principles exploited require one semi-infinite (or at least multimicron) dimensions for resonant mode coupling [30], [47], [48]. This property intrinsically limits the optical transfer functions to also act one-dimensionally. An open challenge is achieving resonant scattering of point-like sources with complete control over existing wavefronts; quasi-bound or guided states with long lifetimes embedded within a structure capable of arbitrary wavefront shaping in two dimensions would be a transformative development amenable to efficient reconfigurable and tunable devices and will surely be a focus of future research.
Even with new design methodologies, achieving theoretically predicted quality factors can present challenges. Intrinsic material absorption and fabrication-induced scattering losses will naturally reduce the achievable Q. In periodic structures, long-range order, illumination coherence, and device size all contribute to the achievable Q factors. As these modes exist with particular radiation patterns and mode locations in k-space, the careful design of illumination and collection configurations is critical to observe these quasi-bound states. Furthermore, recently developed designs in infinitely two-dimensionally periodic structures such as biperiodic unit cells [51] or other perturbations that couple otherwise dark modes to the radiation continuum all depend on small, perturbative, differences between metasurface elements. The previously derived scaling relations, where the quality factor has an inverse square relationship with the perturbation size [52], require uniformity that is substantially smaller than the perturbation of interest. At optical frequencies, this presents some practical limitations on the devices that can be made. Notions of topologically robust high-Q modes investigated in photonic crystals have shown promise [50], but their translation to lower dimensionality remains an open question. Further developments in robust design strategies will be important for the implementation of these ultrahigh-Q designs in deployable devices.
3 Summary and outlook
The strong resonant interaction and low loss of high-Q nanoantennas make them particularly well suited for application in tunable and nonlinear photonic devices [53], [54]. Individual Mie-resonant structures, for example, can be employed as light sources in a footprint several times smaller than the wavelength of the light being emitted, making them attractive for integration in dense photonic networks and system-on-a-chip sensors [55]. When arranged the form of a metasurface, such resonators may also assist in structuring coherent light, forming “metasurface lasers” [56] that are capable of producing new forms of chiral laser light [57] and accessing subwavelength lasing modes at low pump powers [38], [58]. Access to optical nonlinearities has also been used to form optical switches [59], achieve asymmetric transmission [60], dynamic reciprocity [61], and break Lorentz reciprocity for application in optical isolators and circulators. These Mie-resonant structures can also enhance the nonlinear response of materials with which they are interfaced when the material of interest is placed sufficiently within the near field of the Mie resonance; this property has been especially useful in studying the nonlinear properties of novel two-dimensional materials [62]. It is also possible to interface these structures with a host of other media to lend a strong resonant interaction at any wavelength desirable, from the IR through the UV [63].
In addition to nonlinear wavefront shaping, these resonant antennas can also form the basis of active and reactive optical devices [45], [64], [65]. For example, resonant nanophotonic antennas have allowed for wavelength conversion and modulation [66], quantum state transduction [67], and myriad other technologies for on-chip optical communication and computation. These technologies rely on the additional light-matter interaction and the resonant linewidth to make practical devices. Embedding these antennas into phase-gradient metasurfaces could enable wholly new device designs with complete and tunable control over free-space optical wavefronts with an optical or electric field. Furthermore, access to diffraction in a resonant manner could allow for multiplexed sensing modalities, in which an external change in the refractive index or other parameter can impact the diffraction. Optical biosensors relying on high-quality factors have already been demonstrated in transmissive and reflective devices [68], so extending the radiation channels available for sensing promises to increase sensitivity and multiplexing abilities. The local electromagnetic field can also be designed to be sensitive to particular properties of liquid analytes. For example, chiral light-matter interactions can be engineered to have enhanced near-field interactions with observables in the far field [69]. In addition, enhanced sensitivity to vibrational modes of molecules can be used for molecular identification [70]. Resonant nanophotonics that can be arbitrarily multiplexed in energy and momentum will provide increased degrees of freedom for sensitive detection and sensing of materials both in the near field and far field.
Integrated photonics researchers are currently focused on scaling up planar, waveguide-based chips, striving to revolutionize applications spanning light speed matrix multiplication to point-of-care multipathogen medical tests. But, foreshadowed by emerging 3D electronic circuit designs and by progress in artificial neural networks, photonic systems could soon also benefit from less intuitive and highly interconnected network architectures. High-Q nanoscale wavefront shaping structures will undoubtedly play a cornerstone role in bringing this vision to fruition. Developments in device design, material synthesis, nanofabrication, and characterization will need to be combined if the energy scaling requirements for real-world applications are to be met. We envision the intersection of these efforts transforming applications from optical sensing to quantum and classical computing with free-space optical devices.
Funding source: Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Award Identifier / Grant number: FA9550-20-1-0120
Funding source: Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Funding source: Eastman Kodak
Funding source: Moore Foundation
Award Identifier / Grant number: 6881
Funding source: National Science Foundation
Funding source: U.S. Department of Defense
Award Identifier / Grant number: DGE-1656518
Funding source: National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate
Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: We gratefully acknowledge support from an AFOSR grant (grant no. FA9550-20-1-0120), which supported the work as well as the salaries of D.B, M.L, and J.A.D. We also acknowledge funding from the Moore Foundation, which supported J.H.’s salary through a Moore Inventors Fellowship under grant number 6881. J.D. is supported by a Kodak Stanford Graduate Fellowship. E.K. acknowledges support from a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under grant no. DGE-1656518. S.D. is supported by the Department of Defense (DOD) through the National Defense Science and Engineering (NDSEG) Fellowship Program.
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
[1] S. Maier and H. Atwater, “Plasmonics: localization and guiding of electromagnetic energy in metal/dielectric structures,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 98, no. 1, p. 011101, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1951057.Search in Google Scholar
[2] S. Maier, M. Brongersma, P. Kik, S. Meltzer, A. Requicha, and H. Atwater, “Plasmonics – a route to nanoscale optical devices,” Adv. Mater., vol. 13, no. 19, p. 1501–1505, 2001.10.1002/1521-4095(200110)13:19<1501::AID-ADMA1501>3.0.CO;2-ZSearch in Google Scholar
[3] J. Schuller, E. Barnard, W. Cai, Y. Jun, J. White, and M. Brongersma, “Plasmonic for extreme light concentration and manipulation,” Nat. Mater., vol. 9, p. 193–204, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2630.Search in Google Scholar
[4] N. Engheta, A. Salandrino, and A. Alu, “Circuit elements at optical frequencies: nanoinductors, nanocapacitors, and nanoresistors,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 95, no. 9, p. 095504, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.095504.Search in Google Scholar
[5] N. Engheta, “Circuits with light at nanoscales: optical nanocircuits inspired by metamaterials,” Science, vol. 317, no. 5845, pp. 1698–1702, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1364/meta.2007.tha1.Search in Google Scholar
[6] S. Bozhevolnyi, V. Volkov, E. Devaux, J. Laluet, and T. Ebbesen, “Channel plasmon subwavelength waveguide components including interferometers and ring resonators,” Nature, pp. 508–511, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04594.Search in Google Scholar
[7] A. Boltasseva, T. Nikolajsen, K. Leosson, K. Kjaer, M. Larsen, and S. Bozhevolnyi, “Integrated optical components utilizing long-range surface plasmon polaritons,” J. Light. Technol, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 413–422, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2004.835749.Search in Google Scholar
[8] J. Dionne, K. Diest, L. Sweatlock, and H. Atwater, “PlasMOStor: a metal− oxide− Si field effect plasmonic modulator,” Nano Lett., pp. 897–902, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1021/nl803868k.Search in Google Scholar
[9] M. Noginov, G. Zhu, A. Belgrave, et al., “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature, pp. 1110–1112, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08318.Search in Google Scholar
[10] A. Kuznetsov, A. Miroshnichenko, M. Brongersma, Y. Kivshar, and B. Luk’yanchuk, “Optically resonant dielectric nanostructures,” Science, vol. 354, no. 6314, p. 846, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2472.Search in Google Scholar
[11] A. C. Overvig, S. Shrestha, S. Malek, et al., “Dielectric metasurfaces for complete and independent control of the optical amplitude and phase,” Light Sci. Appl., pp. 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-019-0201-7.Search in Google Scholar
[12] N. Yu, P. Genevet, M. Kats, et al., “Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction,” Science, pp. 333–337, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210713.Search in Google Scholar
[13] D. Lin, Fan, P., Hasman, E., and Brongersma, M., “Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements,” Science, pp. 298–302, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1253213.Search in Google Scholar
[14] X. Yin, Ye, Z., Rho, J., Wang, Y., and Zhang, X., “Photonic spin Hall effect at metasurfaces,” Science, pp. 1405–1407, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231758.Search in Google Scholar
[15] G. Zheng, Muhlenbernd, H., Kenney, M., Li, G., T. Zentgraf, and S. Zhang, “Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency,” Nat. Nanotechnol., pp. 308–312, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.2.Search in Google Scholar
[16] J. Mueller, Rubin, N., Devlin, R., Groever, B., and F. Capasso, “Metasurface polarization optics: independent phase control of arbitrary orthogonal states of polarization,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 2017.Search in Google Scholar
[17] Y. Yu, Zhu, A., Paniagua-Dominguez, R., Luk’yanchuk, B., Kuznetsov, A., “High‐transmission dielectric metasurface with 2π phase control at visible wavelengths,” Laser Photon. Rev. pp. 412–418, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201500041.Search in Google Scholar
[18] Y. Yao, Shankar, R., Kats, M., et al., “Electrically tunable metasurface perfect absorbers for ultrathin mid-infrared optical modulators,” Nano Lett. pp. 6526–6532, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1021/nl503104n.Search in Google Scholar
[19] Y. Huang, Lee, H., Sokhoyan, R., et al., “Gate-tunable conducting oxide metasurfaces,” Nano Lett., pp. 5319–5325, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00555.Search in Google Scholar
[20] J. Zhang, Wei, X., Ruklenko, I., Chen, H., and Zhu, W., “Electrically tunable metasurface with independent frequency and amplitude modulations,” ACS Photonics, pp. 265–271, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.9b01532.Search in Google Scholar
[21] S. Law, Yu, L., Rosenberg, A., and Wasserman, D., “All-semiconductor plasmonic nanoantennas for infrared sensing,” Nano Lett., pp. 4569–4574, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1021/nl402766t.Search in Google Scholar
[22] W. Ye, Zeuner, F., Li, X., et al., “Spin and wavelength multiplexed nonlinear metasurface holography,” Nat. Commun., pp. 1–7, 2016.10.1038/ncomms11930Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[23] N. Nookala, Lee, J., Tymchenko, M., et al., “Ultrathin gradient nonlinear metasurface with a giant nonlinear response,” Optica, pp. 283–288, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.3.000283.Search in Google Scholar
[24] B. Peng, Ozdemir, S., Lei, F., et al., “Parity-time-symmetric whispering gallery microcavities,” Nat. Phys., pp. 394–398, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2927.Search in Google Scholar
[25] B. Stern, Ji, X., Okawachi, Y., Gaeta, A., and Lipson, M., “Battery-operated integrated frequency comb generator,” Nature, pp. 401–405, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0598-9.Search in Google Scholar
[26] S. Person, Jain, M., Lapin, Z., Saenz, J., Wicks, G., and Novotny, L., “Demonstration of zero optical backscattering from single nanoparticles,” Nano Lett., vol. 13, no. 4, 2013, 1806–1809 https://doi.org/10.1021/nl4005018.Search in Google Scholar
[27] K. Yao and Liu, Y., “Controlling electric and magnetic resonances for ultracompact nanoantennas with tunable directionality,” ACS Photonics, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 953–963, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00697.Search in Google Scholar
[28] T. Shibanuma, Albella, P., and Maier, S., “Unidirectional light scattering with high efficiency at optical frequencies based on low-loss dielectric nanoantennas,” Nanoscale, vol. 8, no. 29, pp. 14184–14192, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6nr04335f.Search in Google Scholar
[29] F. Monticone and Alu, A., “Embedded photonic eigenvalues in 3D nanostructures,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 112, no. 21, p. 213903, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/metamaterials.2014.6948652.Search in Google Scholar
[30] M. Lawrence, Barton, D.III, Dixon, J., et al., “High quality factor phase gradient metasurfaces,” Nat. Nanotechnol., 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-0754-x.Search in Google Scholar
[31] K. Koshelev, Kruk, S., Melik-Gaykazyan, E., et al., “Subwavelength dielectric resonators for nonlinear nanophotonics,” Science, pp. 288–292, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz3985.Search in Google Scholar
[32] T. Lepetit and Kante, B., “Controlling multipolar radiation with symmetries for electromagnetic bound states in the continuum,” Phys. Rev. B, 2014 90, no. 24, p. 241103 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.241103.Search in Google Scholar
[33] C. Wu, Arju, N., Kelp, G., et al., “Spectrally selective chiral silicon metasurfaces based on infrared Fano resonances,” Nat. Commun., pp. 1–9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4892.Search in Google Scholar
[34] V. Fedotov, Rose, M., Prosvirmin, S., Papasimakis, N., and Zheludev, N., “Sharp trapped-mode resonances in planar metamaterials with a broken structural symmetry,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 99, p. 147401, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1109/cleoe-iqec.2007.4387031.Search in Google Scholar
[35] V. Savinov and Zheludev, N., “High-quality metamaterial dispersive grating on the facet of an optical fiber,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 2017.10.1063/1.4990766Search in Google Scholar
[36] K. Koshelev, S. Lepeshov, M. Liu, A. Bogdanov, and Y. Kivshar, “Asymmetric metasurfaces with high-Q resonances governed by bound states in the continuum,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 121, no. 19, p. 193903, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.193903.Search in Google Scholar
[37] P. Jeong, M. Goldflam, S. Campione, et al., “High quality factor toroidal resonances in dielectric metasurfaces,” ACS Photonics, pp. 1699–1707, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.0c00179.Search in Google Scholar
[38] S. Ha, Y. Fu, N. Emani, et al., “Directional lasing in resonant semiconductor nanoantenna arrays,” Nat. Nanotechnol., pp. 1042–1047, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0245-5.Search in Google Scholar
[39] Y. Yang, I. Kravchenko, D. Briggs, and J. Valentine, “All-dielectric metasurface analogue of electromagnetically induced transparency,” Nat. Commun., pp. 1–7, 2014.10.1038/ncomms6753Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[40] A. Overvig, N. Yu, and A. Alu, “Chiral quasi-bound states in the continuum,” 2006, ArXiv:2006.05484: 035434.Search in Google Scholar
[41] A. Overvig, S. Malek, M. Carter, S. Shrestha, and N. Yu, “Selection rules for quasibound states in the continuum,” Phys. Rev. B, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1364/cleo_qels.2020.fm2b.5.Search in Google Scholar
[42] C. Hsu, B. Zhen, A. Stone, J. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljacic, “Bound states in the continuum,” Nat. Rev. Mater., pp. 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.48.Search in Google Scholar
[43] C. Hsu, B. Zhen, J. Lee, et al., “Observation of trapped light within the radiation continuum,” Nature, pp. 188–191, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12289.Search in Google Scholar
[44] A. Overvig, S. Malek, and N. Yu, “Multifunctional nonlocal metasurfaces,” 2020, ArXiv:2005.12332.10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.017402Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[45] E. Klopfer, M. Lawrence, D. Barton, J. Dixon, and J. Dionne, “Dynamic focusing with high quality-factor metalenses,” Nano Lett., vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 5127–5132, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01359.Search in Google Scholar
[46] M. Lawrence, D. Barton, and J. Dionne, “Nonreciprocal flat optics with silicon metasurfaces,” Nano Lett., vol. 18, pp. 1104–1109, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04646.Search in Google Scholar
[47] S. Kim, K. Kim, and J. Caoon, “Optical bound states in the continuum with nanowire geometric superlattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 122, no. 18, p. 187402, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.187402.Search in Google Scholar
[48] S. Kim and J. Cahoon, “Geometric nanophotonics: light management in single nanowires through morphology,” Acc. Chem. Res., pp. 3511–3520, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00515.Search in Google Scholar
[49] Q. Quan and M. Loncar, “Deterministic design of wavelength scale, ultra-high Q photonic crystal nanobeam cavities,” Opt. Express, pp. 18529–18542, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.19.018529.Search in Google Scholar
[50] J. Jin, X. Yin, L. Ni, M. Soljacic, B. Zhen, and C. Peng, “Topologically enabled ultrahigh-Q guided resonances robust to out-of-plane scattering,” Nature, pp. 501–504, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1664-7.Search in Google Scholar
[51] J. Hu, M. Lawrence, and J. Dionne, “High quality factor dielectric metasurfaces for ultraviolet circular dichroism spectroscopy,” ACS Photonics, pp. 36–42, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.9b01352.Search in Google Scholar
[52] S. Fan, W. Suh, and J. Joannopoulos, “Temporal coupled-mode theory for the Fano resonance in optical resonators,” JOSA A, pp. 569–572, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.20.000569.Search in Google Scholar
[53] Y. Yang, W. Wang, A. Boulesbaa, et al., “Nonlinear Fano-resonant dielectric metasurfaces,” Nano Lett., pp. 7388–7393, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02802.Search in Google Scholar
[54] H. Liu, C. Guo, G. Vampa, et al., “Enhanced high-harmonic generation from an all-dielectric metasurface,” Nat. Phys., vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1006–1010, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0233-6.Search in Google Scholar
[55] G. Zograf, D. Ryabov, V. Rutckaia, et al., “Stimulated Raman scattering from mie-resonant subwavelength nanoparticles,” Nano Lett., pp. 5578–5791, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01646.Search in Google Scholar
[56] M. Lawrence and J. Dionne, “Nanoscale nonreciprocity via photon-spin-polarized stimulated Raman scattering,” Nat. Commun., pp. 1–8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11175-z.Search in Google Scholar
[57] H. Sroor, Y. Huang, B. Sephton, et al., “High-purity orbital angular momentum states from a visible metasurface laser,” Nat. Photonics, pp. 1–6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-0623-z.Search in Google Scholar
[58] A. Kodigala, T. Lepetit, Q. Gu, B. Bahari, Y. Fainman, and B. Kante, “Lasing action from photonic bound states in continuum,” Nature, pp. 196–199, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20799.Search in Google Scholar
[59] M. Shcherbakov, P. Vabishchevich, A. Shorokhov, et al., “Ultrafast all-optical switching with magnetic resonances in nonlinear dielectric nanostructures,” Nano Lett., pp. 6985–6990, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02989.Search in Google Scholar
[60] B. Jin and C. Argyropoulos, “Self-induced passive nonreciprocal transmission by nonlinear bifacial dielectric metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. Appl., p. 13054056, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1364/cleo_at.2020.jw2d.18.Search in Google Scholar
[61] Y. Shi, Z. Yu, and S. Fan, “Limitations of nonlinear optical isolators due to dynamic reciprocity,” Nat. Photonics, pp. 388–392, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.79.Search in Google Scholar
[62] N. Bernhardt, K. Koshelev, S. White, et al., “Quasi-BIC resonant enhancement of second-harmonic generation in WS2 monolayers,” Nano Lett., pp. 5309–5314, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01603.Search in Google Scholar
[63] C. Zhang, S. Divitt, Q. Fan, et al., “Low-loss metasurface optics down to the deep ultraviolet region,” Light Sci. Appl., pp. 1–10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-020-0287-y.Search in Google Scholar
[64] S. Li, X. Xu, R. Veetil, V. Valuckas, R. Paniagua-Dominguez, and A. Kuznetsov, “Phase-only transmissive spatial light modulator based on tunable dielectric metasurface,” Science, pp. 1087–1090, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw6747.Search in Google Scholar
[65] P. Wu, R. Pala, G. Shirmanesh, et al., “Dynamic beam steering with all-dielectric electro-optic III-V multiple-quantum-well metasurfaces,” Nat. Commun., pp. 1–9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11598-8.Search in Google Scholar
[66] C. Wang, M. Zhang, M. Yu, R. Zhu, H. Hu, and M. Loncar, “Monolithic lithium niobate photonic circuits for Kerr frequency comb generation and modulation,” Nat. Commun., pp. 1–6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08969-6.Search in Google Scholar
[67] J. Bartholomew, J. Rochman, T. Xie, et al., “On-chip coherent microwave-to-optical transduction mediated by ytterbium in YVO4,” Nat. Commun., pp. 1–6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16996-x.Search in Google Scholar
[68] A. Tittl, A. Leitis, M. Liu, et al., “Imaging-based molecular barcoding with pixelated dielectric metasurfaces,” Science, pp. 1105–1109, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aas9768.Search in Google Scholar
[69] K. Yao and Y. Liu, “Enhancing circular dichroism by chiral hotspots in silicon nanocube dimers,” Nanoscale, vol. 10, no. 18, pp. 8779–8786, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nr00902c.Search in Google Scholar
[70] A. Leitis, Tittle, A., Liu, M., et al., “Angle-multiplexed all-dielectric metasurfaces for broadband molecular fingerprint retrieval,” Sci. Adv., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1–8, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw2871.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 David Barton et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Editorial
- Editorial
- Optoelectronics and Integrated Photonics
- Disorder effects in nitride semiconductors: impact on fundamental and device properties
- Ultralow threshold blue quantum dot lasers: what’s the true recipe for success?
- Waiting for Act 2: what lies beyond organic light-emitting diode (OLED) displays for organic electronics?
- Waveguide combiners for mixed reality headsets: a nanophotonics design perspective
- On-chip broadband nonreciprocal light storage
- High-Q nanophotonics: sculpting wavefronts with slow light
- Thermoelectric graphene photodetectors with sub-nanosecond response times at terahertz frequencies
- High-performance integrated graphene electro-optic modulator at cryogenic temperature
- Asymmetric photoelectric effect: Auger-assisted hot hole photocurrents in transition metal dichalcogenides
- Seeing the light in energy use
- Lasers, Active optical devices and Spectroscopy
- A high-repetition rate attosecond light source for time-resolved coincidence spectroscopy
- Fast laser speckle suppression with an intracavity diffuser
- Active optics with silk
- Nanolaser arrays: toward application-driven dense integration
- Two-dimensional spectroscopy on a THz quantum cascade structure
- Homogeneous quantum cascade lasers operating as terahertz frequency combs over their entire operational regime
- Toward new frontiers for terahertz quantum cascade laser frequency combs
- Soliton dynamics of ring quantum cascade lasers with injected signal
- Fiber Optics and Optical Communications
- Propagation stability in optical fibers: role of path memory and angular momentum
- Perspective on using multiple orbital-angular-momentum beams for enhanced capacity in free-space optical communication links
- Biomedical Photonics
- A fiber optic–nanophotonic approach to the detection of antibodies and viral particles of COVID-19
- Plasmonic control of drug release efficiency in agarose gel loaded with gold nanoparticle assemblies
- Metasurfaces for biomedical applications: imaging and sensing from a nanophotonics perspective
- Hyperbolic dispersion metasurfaces for molecular biosensing
- Fundamentals of Optics
- A Tutorial on the Classical Theories of Electromagnetic Scattering and Diffraction
- Reflectionless excitation of arbitrary photonic structures: a general theory
- Optimization Methods
- Multiobjective and categorical global optimization of photonic structures based on ResNet generative neural networks
- Machine learning–assisted global optimization of photonic devices
- Artificial neural networks for inverse design of resonant nanophotonic components with oscillatory loss landscapes
- Adjoint-optimized nanoscale light extractor for nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond
- Topological Photonics
- Non-Hermitian and topological photonics: optics at an exceptional point
- Topological photonics: Where do we go from here?
- Topological nanophotonics for photoluminescence control
- Anomalous Anderson localization behavior in gain-loss balanced non-Hermitian systems
- Quantum computing, Quantum Optics, and QED
- Quantum computing and simulation
- NIST-certified secure key generation via deep learning of physical unclonable functions in silica aerogels
- Thomas–Reiche–Kuhn (TRK) sum rule for interacting photons
- Macroscopic QED for quantum nanophotonics: emitter-centered modes as a minimal basis for multiemitter problems
- Generation and dynamics of entangled fermion–photon–phonon states in nanocavities
- Polaritonic Tamm states induced by cavity photons
- Recent progress in engineering the Casimir effect – applications to nanophotonics, nanomechanics, and chemistry
- Enhancement of rotational vacuum friction by surface photon tunneling
- Plasmonics and Polaritonics
- Shrinking the surface plasmon
- Polariton panorama
- Scattering of a single plasmon polariton by multiple atoms for in-plane control of light
- A metasurface-based diamond frequency converter using plasmonic nanogap resonators
- Selective excitation of individual nanoantennas by pure spectral phase control in the ultrafast coherent regime
- Semiconductor quantum plasmons for high frequency thermal emission
- Origin of dispersive line shapes in plasmon-enhanced stimulated Raman scattering microscopy
- Epitaxial aluminum plasmonics covering full visible spectrum
- Metaoptics
- Metamaterials with high degrees of freedom: space, time, and more
- The road to atomically thin metasurface optics
- Active nonlocal metasurfaces
- Giant midinfrared nonlinearity based on multiple quantum well polaritonic metasurfaces
- Near-field plates and the near zone of metasurfaces
- High-efficiency metadevices for bifunctional generations of vectorial optical fields
- Printing polarization and phase at the optical diffraction limit: near- and far-field optical encryption
- Optical response of jammed rectangular nanostructures
- Dynamic phase-change metafilm absorber for strong designer modulation of visible light
- Arbitrary polarization conversion for pure vortex generation with a single metasurface
- Enhanced harmonic generation in gases using an all-dielectric metasurface
- Monolithic metasurface spatial differentiator enabled by asymmetric photonic spin-orbit interactions
Articles in the same Issue
- Editorial
- Editorial
- Optoelectronics and Integrated Photonics
- Disorder effects in nitride semiconductors: impact on fundamental and device properties
- Ultralow threshold blue quantum dot lasers: what’s the true recipe for success?
- Waiting for Act 2: what lies beyond organic light-emitting diode (OLED) displays for organic electronics?
- Waveguide combiners for mixed reality headsets: a nanophotonics design perspective
- On-chip broadband nonreciprocal light storage
- High-Q nanophotonics: sculpting wavefronts with slow light
- Thermoelectric graphene photodetectors with sub-nanosecond response times at terahertz frequencies
- High-performance integrated graphene electro-optic modulator at cryogenic temperature
- Asymmetric photoelectric effect: Auger-assisted hot hole photocurrents in transition metal dichalcogenides
- Seeing the light in energy use
- Lasers, Active optical devices and Spectroscopy
- A high-repetition rate attosecond light source for time-resolved coincidence spectroscopy
- Fast laser speckle suppression with an intracavity diffuser
- Active optics with silk
- Nanolaser arrays: toward application-driven dense integration
- Two-dimensional spectroscopy on a THz quantum cascade structure
- Homogeneous quantum cascade lasers operating as terahertz frequency combs over their entire operational regime
- Toward new frontiers for terahertz quantum cascade laser frequency combs
- Soliton dynamics of ring quantum cascade lasers with injected signal
- Fiber Optics and Optical Communications
- Propagation stability in optical fibers: role of path memory and angular momentum
- Perspective on using multiple orbital-angular-momentum beams for enhanced capacity in free-space optical communication links
- Biomedical Photonics
- A fiber optic–nanophotonic approach to the detection of antibodies and viral particles of COVID-19
- Plasmonic control of drug release efficiency in agarose gel loaded with gold nanoparticle assemblies
- Metasurfaces for biomedical applications: imaging and sensing from a nanophotonics perspective
- Hyperbolic dispersion metasurfaces for molecular biosensing
- Fundamentals of Optics
- A Tutorial on the Classical Theories of Electromagnetic Scattering and Diffraction
- Reflectionless excitation of arbitrary photonic structures: a general theory
- Optimization Methods
- Multiobjective and categorical global optimization of photonic structures based on ResNet generative neural networks
- Machine learning–assisted global optimization of photonic devices
- Artificial neural networks for inverse design of resonant nanophotonic components with oscillatory loss landscapes
- Adjoint-optimized nanoscale light extractor for nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond
- Topological Photonics
- Non-Hermitian and topological photonics: optics at an exceptional point
- Topological photonics: Where do we go from here?
- Topological nanophotonics for photoluminescence control
- Anomalous Anderson localization behavior in gain-loss balanced non-Hermitian systems
- Quantum computing, Quantum Optics, and QED
- Quantum computing and simulation
- NIST-certified secure key generation via deep learning of physical unclonable functions in silica aerogels
- Thomas–Reiche–Kuhn (TRK) sum rule for interacting photons
- Macroscopic QED for quantum nanophotonics: emitter-centered modes as a minimal basis for multiemitter problems
- Generation and dynamics of entangled fermion–photon–phonon states in nanocavities
- Polaritonic Tamm states induced by cavity photons
- Recent progress in engineering the Casimir effect – applications to nanophotonics, nanomechanics, and chemistry
- Enhancement of rotational vacuum friction by surface photon tunneling
- Plasmonics and Polaritonics
- Shrinking the surface plasmon
- Polariton panorama
- Scattering of a single plasmon polariton by multiple atoms for in-plane control of light
- A metasurface-based diamond frequency converter using plasmonic nanogap resonators
- Selective excitation of individual nanoantennas by pure spectral phase control in the ultrafast coherent regime
- Semiconductor quantum plasmons for high frequency thermal emission
- Origin of dispersive line shapes in plasmon-enhanced stimulated Raman scattering microscopy
- Epitaxial aluminum plasmonics covering full visible spectrum
- Metaoptics
- Metamaterials with high degrees of freedom: space, time, and more
- The road to atomically thin metasurface optics
- Active nonlocal metasurfaces
- Giant midinfrared nonlinearity based on multiple quantum well polaritonic metasurfaces
- Near-field plates and the near zone of metasurfaces
- High-efficiency metadevices for bifunctional generations of vectorial optical fields
- Printing polarization and phase at the optical diffraction limit: near- and far-field optical encryption
- Optical response of jammed rectangular nanostructures
- Dynamic phase-change metafilm absorber for strong designer modulation of visible light
- Arbitrary polarization conversion for pure vortex generation with a single metasurface
- Enhanced harmonic generation in gases using an all-dielectric metasurface
- Monolithic metasurface spatial differentiator enabled by asymmetric photonic spin-orbit interactions