Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Crosslinguistic constructions and strategies: where do concessive conditionals fit in?

  • EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 10, 2025

Abstract

The present squib is concerned with Croft’s classification of comparative concepts, that is, concepts developed by typologists for crosslinguistic comparison. Croft distinguishes two kinds of comparative concepts: “constructions”, which are defined entirely in functional terms; and “strategies”, which are further specified by formal characteristics. More specifically, this squib is concerned with how the notions of construction and strategy are used in Croft’s discussion of a generally under-studied type of adverbial clause, viz. concessive conditionals. Concessive conditionals are quantified conditionals that express a set of antecedents: ‘if {p 1 , p 2 , p 3 , …}, then q’. There are three subtypes: scalar concessive conditionals (SCCs, ‘even if’), alternative concessive conditionals (ACCs, ‘whether … or’), and universal concessive conditionals (UCCs, ‘wh-ever’). According to Croft, concessive conditionality in general is a construction, with SCCs, ACCs, and UCCs being strategies. This squib, however, proposes that it would be more consistent to treat the three subtypes as constructions rather than as strategies. More precisely, SCCs, ACCs, and UCCs are best seen as sub-constructions of an overarching concessive-conditional construction.


Corresponding author: Tom Bossuyt, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: 1134221N

Acknowledgments

The present study was conducted as part of the author’s doctoral research project on the typology of concessive conditionals. This project is funded by the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO; grant number 1134221N) and the Ghent University Special Research Fund (BOF). I would like to thank Torsten Leuschner, Flor Vander Haegen, Katja Politt, and Martin Haspelmath for their constructive feedback on earlier draft versions of this paper. I am also grateful to the anonymous reviewers and the editorial team of Linguistics Vanguard for their helpful suggestions. The usual disclaimers apply.

References

AnderBois, Scott. 2014. Unconditionals in Yucatec Maya. Proceedings of Form and Analysis in Mayan Linguistics 2. 1–20.Search in Google Scholar

Barlow, Ray. 2023. A grammar of Ulwa (Papua New Guinea). Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bossuyt, Tom. 2023. Concessive conditionals beyond Europe: A typological survey. Studies in Language 47(1). 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20068.bos.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2014. Comparing categories and constructions crosslinguistically (again): The diversity of ditransitives. Linguistic Typology 18(3). 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2014-0021.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2016. Comparative concepts and language-particular categories: Theory and practice. Linguistic Typology 20(2). 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0012.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2022. Morphosyntax: Constructions of the world’s languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316145289Search in Google Scholar

de Hollenbach, Elena. 2013. Gramática del mixteco de Magdalena Peñasco. Tlalpan: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Polar questions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. http://wals.info/chapter/116 (accessed 23 April 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2016. Crosslinguistic categories, comparative concepts, and the Walman diminutive. Linguistic Typology 20(2). 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0009.Search in Google Scholar

Duffley, Patrick & Pierre Larrivée. 2020. Whatever floats your boat: A corpus-based investigation of definiteness, quantification, modality, presuppositional content, scalarity and epistemic stance with wh-ever words. International Review of Pragmatics 12. 206–245. https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01202002.Search in Google Scholar

Gast, Volker & Johan van der Auwera. 2011. Scalar additive operators in the languages of Europe. Language 87(1). 2–54. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2011.0008.Search in Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank. 2024. Glottolog 5.1. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://glottolog.org (accessed 19 February 2025).Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110884210Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2018. How comparative concepts and descriptive linguistic categories are different. In Daniel Van Olmen, Tanja Mortelmans & Frank Brisard (eds.), Aspects of linguistic variation, 83–113. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110607963-004Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2023. On what a construction is. Constructions 15(1). 1–15.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2025. Construction-functions versus construction-strategies. In Chris Lasse Däbritz, Josefina Budzisch & Rodolfo Basile (eds.), Locative and existential predication: On forms, functions and neighboring domains, 44–45. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin & Ekkehard König. 1998. Concessive conditionals in the languages of Europe. In Johan van der Auwera (ed.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, 563–640. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110802610.563Search in Google Scholar

Herbst, Thomas & Peter Uhrig. 2023. Is there any such thing as constructional equivalence? In Paper presented at 10th international contrastive linguistics conference, Mannheim, 18–21 July 2023.Search in Google Scholar

Hetterle, Katja. 2015. Adverbial clauses in cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110409857Search in Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard. 1986. Conditionals, concessive conditionals and concessives: Areas of contrast, overlap and neutralization. In Closs Traugott Elisabeth, Alice ter Meulen, Judith Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds.), On conditionals, 229–246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511753466.013Search in Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd. 1997. Adverbial subordination: A typology and history of adverbial subordinators based on European languages. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110812428Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika & Junko Shimonaya. 2017. Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In Chungmin Lee, Ferenc Kiefer & Manfred Krifka (eds.), Contrastiveness in information structure, alternatives and implicatures, 123–143. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-10106-4_7Search in Google Scholar

Leslau, Wolf. 1995. Reference grammar of Amharic. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.10.1515/9783110114263.1.8.875Search in Google Scholar

Leuschner, Torsten. 2006. Hypotaxis as building-site: The emergence and grammaticalization of concessive conditionals in English, German and Dutch. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Leuschner, Torsten. 2020. Concessive conditionals as a family of constructions. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34. 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00049.leu.Search in Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrey L. 2012. Concessive constructions in even. In Viktor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of concessive constructions, 413–430. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, Stephen & Viriginia Yip. 2011. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Moodie, Jonathan. 2017. Conditional constructions in Lopit, an Eastern Nilotic language. Studies In African Linguistics 46(1–2). 51–66.10.32473/sal.v46i1.107242Search in Google Scholar

Mosel, Ulrike & Even Hovdhaugen. 1992. Samoan reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rawlins, Kyle. 2008. (Un)conditionals: An investigation in the syntax and semantics of conditional structures. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Rawlins, Kyle. 2013. (Un)conditionals. Natural Language Semantics 40. 111–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-012-9087-0.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten & Holger Diessel. 2025. The typology of relative and adverbial clauses. In Anton Benz, Werner Frey, Hans-Martin Gärtner, Manfred Krifka, Mathias Schenner & Marzena Żygis (eds.), Handbook of clausal embedding, 157–213. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Smeets, Ineke. 2008. A grammar of Mapuche. Berlin: de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Stassen, Leon. 2009. Predicative possession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199211654.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620904Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A., Robert E. Longacre & Shin Ja J. Hwang. 2007. Adverbial clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 2, complex constructions, 237–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619434.005Search in Google Scholar

Tsunoda, Tasaku (ed.). 2018. Levels in clause linkage: A crosslinguistic survey. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110519242Search in Google Scholar

Vander Haegen, Flor. 2025. Eine konstruktionistische Mikrotypologie irrelevanzkonditionaler Satzgefüge im Gegenwartsdeutschen: Formale und funktionale Variationsmuster. Ghent: Ghent University PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Vander Haegen, Flor, Tom Bossuyt & Torsten Leuschner. 2022. Emerging into your family of constructions: German [IRR was] ‘no matter what’. Constructions and Frames 14(1). 150–180. https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00058.hae.Search in Google Scholar

Weber, David John. 1989. A grammar of Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Xrakovskij, Viktor S. (ed.). 2012. Typology of concessive constructions. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Zaefferer, Dietmar. 1987. Satztypen, Satzarten, Satzmodi: Was Konditionale (auch) mit Interrogativen zu tun haben. In Jörg Meibauer (ed.), Satzmodus zwischen Grammatik und Pragmatik: Referate anläßlich der 8. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft, Heilberg 1986, 259–285. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111560588-014Search in Google Scholar

Zaefferer, Dietmar. 1991. Conditionals and unconditionals: Cross-linguistic and logical aspects. In Dietmar Zaefferer (ed.), Semantic universals and universal semantics, 210–236. Berlin: Foris.10.1515/9783110870527-011Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-03-24
Accepted: 2025-07-28
Published Online: 2025-11-10

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Editorial 2025
  4. Research Articles
  5. Vowel formant track normalization using discrete cosine transform coefficients
  6. Asymmetry in French speech-in-noise perception: the effects of native dialect and cross-dialectal exposure
  7. Direct pseudo-partitives in US English
  8. A baseline for object clitic climbing in Italian
  9. Semantic granularity in derivation
  10. Shared processing strategies as a mechanism for contact-induced change in flexible constituent order
  11. The (non)canonical status of the ka- passive in Balinese
  12. A comparative study of 时 si 2 /shi 2 in Meixian Hakka and Ancient Chinese using the Minimalist Program
  13. A quantitative method for syntactic gradience: words, phrases, and the constructions in between
  14. Yeah, but how? Operationalizing the functions of the discourse-pragmatic marker yeah
  15. Hotspots for acoustic politeness in Korean and Japanese deferential speech
  16. How fast is fast and how slow is slow in mental simulation? Two rating studies on Estonian speed adverbs
  17. Discourse effects in processing Chinese reflexive pronouns
  18. Attitudinal negotiation: the analysis of online commentary videos about an international event on Chinese social media platform bilibili.com
  19. Crosslinguistic constructions and strategies: where do concessive conditionals fit in?
  20. Recurring patterns in tone (chain) shift
  21. Null pronoun interpretation probed via thematic role ambiguity: a case in Korean
  22. Experimental investigation on quantifier scope in Chinese relative clauses
  23. Sensitivity to honorific agreement: a window into predictive processing
  24. The negative concord illusion: an acceptability study with Czech neg-words
  25. Expletive negation in Italian temporal clauses: an acceptability judgement and a self-paced reading study
  26. Effects of information structure on pronoun resolution: the number of pronouns matters
  27. The cognitive processing of nouns and verbs in second language reading: an eye-tracking study
  28. Comprehension of conversational implicatures in L3 Mandarin
  29. Effects of crosslinguistic influence in definiteness acquisition: comparing HL-English and HL-Russian bilingual children acquiring Hebrew
  30. Multimodal language processing in school-aged Mandarin-speaking children: the role of beat gesture in enhancing memory for discourse information
  31. My Memoji, my self: prosodic correlates of online performed code-switching via avatar
  32. Gender effects in Mandarin creaky voice evaluation: a matched-guise study
  33. Narrating the doctoral journey on Chinese social media: chronotopes and scales in user interaction on Xiaohongshu
  34. Salient Language in Context (SLIC): a web app for collecting real-time attention data in response to audio samples
  35. Children’s emerging sociolinguistic expectations around social roles: a triangulated approach
  36. Situating speakers in change: a methodology for quantifying degree and direction of change over the lifespan
  37. Testing the effect of speech separation on vowel formant estimates
  38. Researching dialects with high school students: a citizen science approach
  39. Sociolinguistic research projects as brands
  40. Do readers perceive various types of knowledge expressed through evidentials in news reports with different degrees of certainty?
  41. Quantitative relationship between distribution of sentence length and dependency distance in Spanish
  42. Large corpora and large language models: a replicable method for automating grammatical annotation
  43. Using ATLAS.ti for constructing and analysing multimodal social media corpora
  44. Exploring the effect of semantic diversity on boundary permeability in verb/noun heterosemy using deep contextualized word embedding
  45. Communicative pressures influence the use of adverbs as well as adjectives: evidence from a crosslinguistic investigation
  46. Non-signers favor two-handed gestures when expressing inherently plural meanings
  47. Encoding Chinese metaphorical motion: a typological perspective
  48. Frequency does not predict the processing speed of multi-morpheme sequences in Japanese
  49. Did he lead monologues or did he talk to himself? How typological distance between source and target language influences the preservation of metaphorical mappings in translation
  50. How long is too long? Production-internal and communicative constraints in the coding of conditionality in Spanish
  51. Long English objects and short Chinese objects: language diversity shaped by cognitive universality
  52. Corrigendum
  53. Corrigendum to: Sign recognition: the effect of parameters and features in sign mispronunciations
Downloaded on 29.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2025-0053/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button