Home Linguistics & Semiotics A quantitative method for syntactic gradience: words, phrases, and the constructions in between
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A quantitative method for syntactic gradience: words, phrases, and the constructions in between

Published/Copyright: January 30, 2025

Abstract

Syntactic gradience has been studied mainly from a qualitative perspective. In this paper, I propose a new method, based on the process of multi-criteria decision-making, that can quantify the word-phrase gradience against the standardized morphosyntactic continuum. This method may be applied to both synchronic and diachronic research, with the discrepancies between compounds and idioms and the lexicalization of compound pronouns in English examined as illustrations.


Corresponding author: Zhen Wu, Department of English, Shandong University, 5 Hongjialou, Jinan, 250100, China, E-mail:

Funding source: Social science fund of Shandong Province

Award Identifier / Grant number: 22DYYJ03

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by Social Science Fund of Shandong Province, China (grant no. 22DYYJ03). I am grateful for the useful feedback of the reviewer. All remaining errors are mine.

References

Aarts, Bas. 2007. Syntactic gradience: The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199219261.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Aljohani, Samirah. 2023. How adjectival can a participle be? In Subsective gradience in English 2nd participles. Oxford: Peter Lang.10.3726/b18519Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, John M. 1997. A notional theory of syntactic categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519734Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 2017. Compounds and compounding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108235679Search in Google Scholar

Belton, Valerie & Theodor J. Stewart. 2002. Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4_11Search in Google Scholar

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2002. An introduction to English morphology: Words and their structure. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Department for Communities and Local Government. 2009. Multi-criteria analysis: A manual. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/multi-criteria-analysis-manual-for-making-government-policy (accessed 1 May 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Egbert, Jesse, Larsson Tove & Biber Douglas. 2020. Doing linguistics with a corpus: Methodological considerations for the everyday user. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108888790Search in Google Scholar

Fonteyn, Lauren. 2019. Categoriality in language change: The case of the English gerund. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190917579.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Giegerich, Heinz J. 2015. Lexical structures: Compounding and the modules of grammar. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748630554Search in Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar

Ishizaka, Alessio & Philippe Nemery. 2013. Multi-criteria decision analysis: Methods and software. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118644898Search in Google Scholar

Kishimoto, Hideki. 2000. Indefinite pronouns and overt N-raising. Linguistic Inquiry 31. 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554451.Search in Google Scholar

Larson, Richard K. & Franc Marušič. 2004. On indefinite pronoun constructions with APs: Reply to Kishimoto. Linguistic Inquiry 35(2). 268–287. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438904323019075.Search in Google Scholar

Leu, Thomas. 2005. Something invisible in English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 11(1). 143–154.Search in Google Scholar

Maekelberghe, Charlotte. 2020. The present-day English gerund system: A cognitive-constructionist account. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110686661Search in Google Scholar

McCawley, James D. 1998. The syntactic phenomena of English, 2nd edn. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Minkova, Donka & Robert Stockwell. 2009. English words: History and structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805929Search in Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo. 2018. Word-formation in English, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316771402Search in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph. 1965. Descriptive statement and serial relationship. Language 41(2). 205–217. https://doi.org/10.2307/411874.Search in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John R. 2004 [1973]. Nouniness. In Bas Aarts, David Danison, Evelien Keizer & Gergana Popova (eds.), Fuzzy grammar: A reader, 351–422. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rúa, Paula López. 2004. The categorical continuum of English blends. English Studies 85(1). 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1076/enst.85.1.63.29107.Search in Google Scholar

Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina. 2018. English compounds and their spelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108181877Search in Google Scholar

Taherdoost, Hamed & Mitra Madanchian. 2023. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts. Encyclopedia 2023(3). 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010006.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 2003. Linguistic categorization, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thakkar, Jitesh J. 2021. Multi-criteria decision making. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.10.1007/978-981-33-4745-8Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Zhen. 2021. Compound pronouns in English. English Language and Linguistics 25(4). 825–849. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674320000386.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-06-02
Accepted: 2024-10-23
Published Online: 2025-01-30

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Editorial 2025
  4. Research Articles
  5. Vowel formant track normalization using discrete cosine transform coefficients
  6. Asymmetry in French speech-in-noise perception: the effects of native dialect and cross-dialectal exposure
  7. Direct pseudo-partitives in US English
  8. A baseline for object clitic climbing in Italian
  9. Semantic granularity in derivation
  10. Shared processing strategies as a mechanism for contact-induced change in flexible constituent order
  11. The (non)canonical status of the ka- passive in Balinese
  12. A comparative study of 时 si 2 /shi 2 in Meixian Hakka and Ancient Chinese using the Minimalist Program
  13. A quantitative method for syntactic gradience: words, phrases, and the constructions in between
  14. Yeah, but how? Operationalizing the functions of the discourse-pragmatic marker yeah
  15. Hotspots for acoustic politeness in Korean and Japanese deferential speech
  16. How fast is fast and how slow is slow in mental simulation? Two rating studies on Estonian speed adverbs
  17. Discourse effects in processing Chinese reflexive pronouns
  18. Attitudinal negotiation: the analysis of online commentary videos about an international event on Chinese social media platform bilibili.com
  19. Crosslinguistic constructions and strategies: where do concessive conditionals fit in?
  20. Recurring patterns in tone (chain) shift
  21. Null pronoun interpretation probed via thematic role ambiguity: a case in Korean
  22. Experimental investigation on quantifier scope in Chinese relative clauses
  23. Sensitivity to honorific agreement: a window into predictive processing
  24. The negative concord illusion: an acceptability study with Czech neg-words
  25. Expletive negation in Italian temporal clauses: an acceptability judgement and a self-paced reading study
  26. Effects of information structure on pronoun resolution: the number of pronouns matters
  27. The cognitive processing of nouns and verbs in second language reading: an eye-tracking study
  28. Comprehension of conversational implicatures in L3 Mandarin
  29. Effects of crosslinguistic influence in definiteness acquisition: comparing HL-English and HL-Russian bilingual children acquiring Hebrew
  30. Multimodal language processing in school-aged Mandarin-speaking children: the role of beat gesture in enhancing memory for discourse information
  31. My Memoji, my self: prosodic correlates of online performed code-switching via avatar
  32. Gender effects in Mandarin creaky voice evaluation: a matched-guise study
  33. Narrating the doctoral journey on Chinese social media: chronotopes and scales in user interaction on Xiaohongshu
  34. Salient Language in Context (SLIC): a web app for collecting real-time attention data in response to audio samples
  35. Children’s emerging sociolinguistic expectations around social roles: a triangulated approach
  36. Situating speakers in change: a methodology for quantifying degree and direction of change over the lifespan
  37. Testing the effect of speech separation on vowel formant estimates
  38. Researching dialects with high school students: a citizen science approach
  39. Sociolinguistic research projects as brands
  40. Do readers perceive various types of knowledge expressed through evidentials in news reports with different degrees of certainty?
  41. Quantitative relationship between distribution of sentence length and dependency distance in Spanish
  42. Large corpora and large language models: a replicable method for automating grammatical annotation
  43. Using ATLAS.ti for constructing and analysing multimodal social media corpora
  44. Exploring the effect of semantic diversity on boundary permeability in verb/noun heterosemy using deep contextualized word embedding
  45. Communicative pressures influence the use of adverbs as well as adjectives: evidence from a crosslinguistic investigation
  46. Non-signers favor two-handed gestures when expressing inherently plural meanings
  47. Encoding Chinese metaphorical motion: a typological perspective
  48. Frequency does not predict the processing speed of multi-morpheme sequences in Japanese
  49. Did he lead monologues or did he talk to himself? How typological distance between source and target language influences the preservation of metaphorical mappings in translation
  50. How long is too long? Production-internal and communicative constraints in the coding of conditionality in Spanish
  51. Long English objects and short Chinese objects: language diversity shaped by cognitive universality
  52. Corrigendum
  53. Corrigendum to: Sign recognition: the effect of parameters and features in sign mispronunciations
Downloaded on 16.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2024-0114/html
Scroll to top button