Home Gender effects in Mandarin creaky voice evaluation: a matched-guise study
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Gender effects in Mandarin creaky voice evaluation: a matched-guise study

  • Aini Li ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Wei Lai ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: August 12, 2025
Linguistics Vanguard
From the journal Linguistics Vanguard

Abstract

This study investigates how Mandarin listeners evaluate creaky voice across different gendered voices using a matched-guise design. In contrast to findings in American English, where female creak is often evaluated negatively, Mandarin listeners did not display different evaluations of creaky voice based on speaker gender. Personality traits associated with creaky voice, such as attractiveness, competence, likeability, intelligence, and wealth, did not show systematic gender effects in Mandarin, and these dimensions were found to be highly correlated through principal component analysis. These results suggest that the gender bias against creaky female voices observed in American English does not generalize to Mandarin, offering a potential explanation for previously reported crosslinguistic differences in creak identification between American English and Mandarin Chinese. The absence of gender-based social bias in Mandarin may account for listeners’ more phonetically driven identification of creak, making creak more identifiable in low-pitched male voices rather than high-pitched female voices. Taken together, the findings underscore the importance of incorporating social evaluation into speech perception studies and call for further social evaluation studies of creaky voice across various social dimensions and in crosslinguistic contexts.


Corresponding author: Aini Li, Department of Linguistics and Translation, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Nicole Holliday and Jianjing Kuang for their input during the early development of this project. We also appreciate the helpful suggestions from the two anonymous reviewers. An earlier version of this work was presented at LSA 2023 and NWAV-AP7, and we thank the audience for their valuable feedback.

References

Abdelli-Beruh, Nassima B., Lesley Wolk & Dianne Slavin. 2014. Prevalence of vocal fry in young adult male American English speakers. Journal of Voice 28(2). 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.08.011.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Rindy C., Casey A. Klofstad, William J. Mayew & Mohan Venkatachalam. 2014. Vocal fry may undermine the success of young women in the labor market. PLoS One 9(5). e97506. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097506.Search in Google Scholar

Barr, Dale J., Roger Levy, Christoph Scheepers & Harry J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3). 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, Lisa. 2019. The effects of pitch, gender, and prosodic context on the identification of creaky voice. Phonetica 76(4). 235–262.10.1159/000490948Search in Google Scholar

Esling, John. 1978. The identification of features of voice quality in social groups. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 8(1–2). 18–23.10.1017/S0025100300001699Search in Google Scholar

Esposito, Lewis. 2016. I am a perpetual underdog: Lady Gaga’s use of creaky voice in the construction of a sincere pop star persona. Swarthmore: Swarthmore College undergraduate thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Esposito, Lewis. 2017. “That’s what it felt like, ‘you’re pathetic’ ”: Creaky voice, affective stance, and authentication in the speech of Lady Gaga. Lifespans and Styles 3(2). 2–12.10.2218/ls.v3i2.2017.1862Search in Google Scholar

Gobl, Christer & Ailbhe Ní Chasaide. 2003. The role of voice quality in communicating emotion, mood and attitude. Speech Communication 40(1–2). 189–212.10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00082-1Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew & Peter Ladefoged. 2001. Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics 29(4). 383–406.10.1006/jpho.2001.0147Search in Google Scholar

Greer, Sarah D. F. & Stephen J. Winters. 2015. The perception of coolness: Differences in evaluating voice quality in male and female speakers. In Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow: University of Glasgow. Available at: https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs/icphs2015.Search in Google Scholar

Henton, Caroline G. 1989. Sociophonetic aspects of creaky voice. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 86(S1). S26.10.1121/1.2027434Search in Google Scholar

Hildebrand-Edgar, Nicole. 2016. Creaky voice: An interactional resource for indexing authority. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Kuang, Jianjing. 2018. The influence of tonal categories and prosodic boundaries on the creakiness in Mandarin. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143(6). EL509–EL515. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5043094.Search in Google Scholar

Laver, John. 1980. The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lambert, Wallace E., Richard C. Hodgson, Robert C. Gardner & Samuel Fillenbaum. 1960. Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60(1). 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044430.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Aini, Wei Lai & Jianjing Kuang. 2023. Creaky voice identification in Mandarin: The effects of prosodic position, tone, pitch range and creak locality. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 154(1). 126–140.10.1121/10.0019941Search in Google Scholar

Ligon, Claire, Carrie Rountrey, Noopur Vaidya Rank, Michael Hull & Aliaa Khidr. 2019. Perceived desirability of vocal fry among female speech communication disorders graduate students. Journal of Voice 33(5). 805.e21–805.e35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.03.010.Search in Google Scholar

Melvin, Shannon. 2015. Gender variation in creaky voice and fundamental frequency. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2011. The semiotic hitchhiker’s guide to creaky voice: Circulation and gendered hardcore in a Chicana/o gang persona. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21(2). 261–280.10.1111/j.1548-1395.2011.01110.xSearch in Google Scholar

Parker, Michelle A. & Stephanie A. Borrie. 2018. Judgments of intelligence and likability of young adult female speakers of American English: The influence of vocal fry and the surrounding acoustic-prosodic context. Journal of Voice 32(5). 538–545.10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.08.002Search in Google Scholar

Pittam, Jeffery. 1987. Listeners’ evaluations of voice quality in Australian English speakers. Language and Speech 30(2). 99–113.10.1177/002383098703000201Search in Google Scholar

Podesva, Robert J. 2013. Gender and the social meaning of non-modal phonation type. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 427–448. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v37i1.832Search in Google Scholar

Tamminga, Meredith. 2017. Matched guise effects can be robust to speech style. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142(1). EL18–EL23. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4990399.Search in Google Scholar

Yuasa, Ikuko Patricia. 2010. Creaky voice: A new feminine voice quality for young urban-oriented upwardly mobile American women? American Speech 85(3). 315–337.10.1215/00031283-2010-018Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-11-22
Accepted: 2025-05-27
Published Online: 2025-08-12

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2024-0237/html
Scroll to top button