Home Petrography and geochemistry of clastic sedimentary rocks as evidence for the provenance of the Jurassic stratum in the Daqingshan area
Article Open Access

Petrography and geochemistry of clastic sedimentary rocks as evidence for the provenance of the Jurassic stratum in the Daqingshan area

  • Minjie Zhang EMAIL logo , Yanqiu Yu , Jinyong Choi , Kui Cai and Mingyuan Shi
Published/Copyright: November 9, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The Daqingshan area is located in the Khondalite belt in the northern margin of the North China Craton. It has the best-preserved Mesozoic basin and is an ideal area for research on Jurassic strata. Sandstones mainly contain quartz and feldspar, with significantly less debris content. In addition, petrography and geochemical classifications have revealed the presence of arkose and wacke. Chondrite-normalized rare earth element patterns of samples are characterized by the enrichment of light rare elements and the flat trend toward heavy rare earth elements. Petrography and source rock discrimination diagrams of geochemical data suggest the presence of felsic rock and Precambrian basement in the northern and southern parts of the basin, which are crucial source areas; however, few mafic materials occur in the Wudanggou Formation. Tectonic discrimination diagrams of geochemical data show that the source materials were deposited on an active continental margin and/or continental island arc. Petrological and geochemical data from the Wudanggou Formation and Changhangou Formation samples suggest that the Yanshan movement influenced the formation of the Changhangou Formation.

1 Introduction

Sedimentary rocks are the only evidence of the ancient upper crust that might have been removed by erosion, covered by sedimentary deposits or ice, or buried deep in the crust. The combination of detrital and geochemical compositions of sedimentary rocks provides important information on the characteristics of their provenance and tectonic setting [1,2]. The basin received sediments from surrounding orogenic belts, preserving evidence of orogenic belt elevation, thus reflecting the history of orogenic belt erosion [3,4]. Therefore, the study of basins should be closely linked to that of the orogenic belts.

The North China Craton (NCC) is one of the oldest continental blocks in the world. The Daqingshan area is part of the north margin of NCC located in the Khondalite belt (see Figure 1a). It primarily comprises the northern Jurassic basin and the southern Daqingshan fold and thrust system (see Figure 1b). In the last decade, the Yinshan area has been extensively investigated in terms of thrust nappe system [5,6,7,8,9] and lithology [10,11], geochemistry [12,13,14], and geochronology [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30] of the Precambrian basement.

Figure 1 (a) Location of Daqingshan area in the North China Craton (modified from ref. [39]). (b) Geological map of the study area (modified from ref. [40]).
Figure 1

(a) Location of Daqingshan area in the North China Craton (modified from ref. [39]). (b) Geological map of the study area (modified from ref. [40]).

The northern margin of the NCC has a complex history of tectonic evolution since the Mesozoic time [5,9]. A large-scale thrust nappe developed in the Daqingshan area during the Indosinian–Yanshanian epoch [5,9]. An Indosinian thrust nappe that formed in the Late Triassic–Early Jurassic caused the crust to undergo strong compression and later tension, thereby forming the Jurassic Basin [31,32]. The time of origin of the Daqingshan nappe in Yanshanian is uncertain. Some researchers suggest that the thrust nappe formed during 125–121 Ma [31], whereas others believe that the thrust nappe formed toward the end of the Middle Jurassic [33,34]. Recently, several researchers have agreed that the age range of 125–121 Ma is correct for the late Yanshanian nappe, starting before 160 Ma [35,36,37,38].

The Jurassic basin of the Daqingshan area is the most well-preserved Mesozoic basin in the Yinshan area, which is the ideal area for exploring the Jurassic strata. The geochemistry and tectonic setting of the Jurassic strata have not been studied in detail. The purpose of this study is to evaluate sandstone petrography and the major and trace elemental geochemistry of the Jurassic strata to understand their provenance, tectonic setting, and weathering condition during Jurassic; the resulting findings will be useful in reconstructing the palaeogeography of the region.

2 Geological setting

The Precambrian basement in the Daqingshan area primarily contains gneiss, granulite, and granite. Cambrian and Ordovician strata unconformably overlie basement rocks in confined areas and mainly comprise erosion-resistant carbonate and minor sandstone, shale, and local pebbly conglomerate along the unconformity [41]. Permian and Triassic terrigenous clastic rocks are found south of the basin, and they mainly include purplish-red fluvial siltstone, sandstone, and conglomerate together with minor syenite (233 ± 7 Ma) that intruded the basement near the present-day site of Yongfu Village [42].

The Early–Middle Jurassic strata (Wudanggou Formation) in the basin were controlled through synchronous normal faulting [31,41]. The Wudanggou Formation exhibits an unconformable contact with the Precambrian basement. The Wudanggou Formation mainly crops out in the western part of the basin (see Figure 1b), with several more E–W erosional remnants in the southwest of the Daqingshan range [37]. The lower section of the Wudanggou Formation primarily comprises cobble-boulder conglomerate with a few decimeters to more than 2 m, indicating fan deltaic facies. The middle section is mainly an interbedding of pebbly sandstones and gritrocks. Sandstone beds are typically marked by erosive bases and trough or cross-beddings (see Figure 2b). These changes suggest a braided river system in the middle Wudanggou Formation, and the upper Wudanggou Formation dominated by sandstones with interbedded silty mudstones shows a shallow-lacustrine system (see Figure 2). According to regional stratigraphic correlation and radiometric age controls [31,43,44,45], the lower part of the Wudanggou Formation is equivalent to the Xingshikou Formation (198 ± 5 Ma) in the Yanshan belt [46], and the upper part is equivalent to the combined Yondingzhuang and Datong formations (179–171 Ma) in the Taihang Mountains [44,47]. The flora assemblage in the Upper Wudanggou Formation indicates that the formation is Early–Middle Jurassic in age [48].

Figure 2 Field photographs of the Jurassic strata in Daqingshan area; (a) cobble-bould conglomerate in lower Wudanggou Formation. (b) Sandstone beds with cross-beddings. (c) Horizontal bedding occurs in Changhangou Formation. (d) A weathering-denuding surface in upper Changhangou Formation. (e) Polymictic conglomerates in lower Daqingshan Formation. (f) Thick middle sandstone in Daqingshan Formation.
Figure 2

Field photographs of the Jurassic strata in Daqingshan area; (a) cobble-bould conglomerate in lower Wudanggou Formation. (b) Sandstone beds with cross-beddings. (c) Horizontal bedding occurs in Changhangou Formation. (d) A weathering-denuding surface in upper Changhangou Formation. (e) Polymictic conglomerates in lower Daqingshan Formation. (f) Thick middle sandstone in Daqingshan Formation.

The Middle Jurassic Changhangou Formation is distributed in the middle of the basin. The lower beds are characterized by thick-bedded to massive, coarse-grained sandstone (see Figure 2). Consequently, the sandstone-dominated sequence is interpreted to have been a braided river system [37]. Both grain size and bed thickness of the sandstone decrease upward, and the siltstone and mudstone portions represent shallow and deep parts of a lacustrine system. The upper section mainly comprises medium- to coarse-grained sandstone, with variable large-scale cross-stratifications intercalated with minor thin-bedded siltstone, representing a shore-shallow-lacustrine system indicative of lake water and mass recession (see Figure 2). Zircon U–Pb dating of the volcanic materials from the Changhangou Formation yields an age of 163.7 ± 1.0 Ma [37], suggesting that the Changhangou Formation is Middle Jurassic in age. This may indicate a relationship between the deposition of the Changhangou Formation and the initiation of the Yanshanian nappe in the Daqingshan area.

The Daqingshan Formation has a disconformable contact with the underlying Changhangou Formation [33]. The lower member of the section mainly includes unsorted, clast-supported, cobble–pebble conglomerate, intercalated with minor coarse-grained or pebbly sandstone, representing a proximal alluvial environment. The proportion of siltstone and sandstone gradually increases in the upper part of the Daqingshan Formation, indicating a relatively distal fluvial system (see Figure 2). Regionally, the Daqingshan Formation correlates well with the Tuchengzi Formation in the Yanshan belt. Previous researchers suggested that the geologic age of the Tuchengzi Formation should be 154–137 Ma [49,50,51].

3 Methods

Sandstone and mudstone samples were collected from Baicaigou town and Wuchuan city. Twenty-one thin sections of sandstone were used for modal analysis. We performed a modal analysis of the delegate sandstones through the Gazzi Dickinson method using more than 300 points per sample. According to this method, monocrystalline quartz (Qm), polycrystalline quartz (Qp), plagioclase (Pl), K-feldspar (Kf), lithic fragments (L), and mica (M) were counted. Petrofacies were classified based on Folk’s [52]. Samples were selected for geochemical analysis: 10 siltstone or mudstone samples and 9 sandstone samples. All geochemically analyzed samples from the Wudanggou Formation and Changhangou Formation are from the Baicaigou section (see Figure 3). Geochemically analyzed samples from the Daqingshan Formation were scattered according to outcrop distribution (Figure 1b). Bulk chemical analyses of major, trace, and rare earth elements (REEs) were performed at the Hebei Province Regional Geology Institute. Major element analysis was performed using a Phillips PW 1480 X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF). Total Fe was reported as Fe2O3. Loss on ignition (LOI) was measured by weighing before and after 1 h ignition at 1,000°C. Trace elements and REEs were determined via inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The accuracy of the XRF analyses was estimated to be better than 1%. Analytical precision for trace elements and the REEs is generally better than 5%.

Figure 3 Measured stratigraphic sections from west to east: Erdaogou, Baicaigou, Houshiyangou, Sandaogou, and Deshenggou. See Figure 1b for sections location. C: conglomerate; S: sandstone; M: mudstone.
Figure 3

Measured stratigraphic sections from west to east: Erdaogou, Baicaigou, Houshiyangou, Sandaogou, and Deshenggou. See Figure 1b for sections location. C: conglomerate; S: sandstone; M: mudstone.

4 Results

4.1 Petrography

Petrographic analyses of sandstones were performed to determine the sandstone as well as the tectonic and sedimentary histories [54]. Petrographic composition and detrital modes of the Jurassic sandstones are presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Modal analysis data of Jurassic sandstones in the Daqingshan area

SampleQmQpPlKfsLMQFLt (%)
QFLt
Daqingshan Formation
SGX013545311642 57 1
SGX022925911834 65 1
SGX033825521241 58 1
P22B 2-13025913534 63 3
P22B 5-13116222233 65 2
P22B 6-42925821834 65 1
P22B 10-13026412132 66 2
Changhanhou Formation
P23B 1-12816521329 69 2
P23B 2-23426013135 61 4
Wudanggou Formation
SGX075263831058 41 1
SGX084863781054 45 1
SGX09501318181063 36 1
SGX105283541060 39 1
SGX1139153660154 44 2
SGX125473221264 35 1
P18B 5-14673872053 45 2
P18B 6-144935111053 46 1
P18B 749133071060 37 3
P18B 7-340935141149 49 1
P18B 7-742839101050 49 1
P18B 9-2351035181145 54 1

Qm = monocrystalline quartz grains; Qp = polycrystalline quartz grains; Pl = plagioclase; Kfs = K-feldspar; L = lithic fragments; M = mica; Q = Qm + Qp; F = Pl + Kfs; Lt = total unstable rock fragments.

The sandstones of the Wudanggou Formation comprise subrounded to angular, moderately sorted, immature, medium to coarse sandstones (see Figure 4a and b). Partial sericitization of plagioclase can be observed in sample SGX08 (see Figure 4b). The quartz grains are Qm and Qp, ranging from 35% to 52% and 6% to 15%, respectively (see Table 1). Feldspar is mainly plagioclase (18–39%), whereas K-feldspar occurs in minor amounts ranging from 2 to 18% (see Table 1). Compared with the Wudanggou Formation, the sandstone from the Changhangou Formation contains more feldspar (61–67%) and less quartz (29–36%). The quartz grains are mostly Qm, and Feldspar is mainly plagioclase. The sandstone from the Changhangou Formation primarily contains plagioclase (53–64%) and quartz (32–43%). Additionally, more mica is present in the sandstones from the Daqingshan Formation, ranging from 1 to 8% (see Figure 4c).

Figure 4 Representative thin-section of the Jurassic clastic rocks under cross-polarized; (a) polycrystalline quartz and K-feldspar grains in the sandstone of Wudanggou Formation. (b) Plagiocalase grains with calcitization or sercitization in the sandstone of Wudanggou Formation. (c) Mica grains in the sandstone of Daqingshan Formation. (d) Mudstone with weakly metamorphoic from Changhangou Formation. Qm = monocrystalline quartz grains; Qp = polycrystalline quartz grains; Pl = plagioclase; Kfs = K-feldspar; Mu = muscovite.
Figure 4

Representative thin-section of the Jurassic clastic rocks under cross-polarized; (a) polycrystalline quartz and K-feldspar grains in the sandstone of Wudanggou Formation. (b) Plagiocalase grains with calcitization or sercitization in the sandstone of Wudanggou Formation. (c) Mica grains in the sandstone of Daqingshan Formation. (d) Mudstone with weakly metamorphoic from Changhangou Formation. Qm = monocrystalline quartz grains; Qp = polycrystalline quartz grains; Pl = plagioclase; Kfs = K-feldspar; Mu = muscovite.

To classify the studied sandstones according to the Folk classification [53], quartz (Q), feldspar (F), and total unstable rock fragment (Lt) were recalculated to 100% ignoring the cements, matrix, and accessory minerals (see Table 1). The studied sandstones mainly fall within the arkose fields (see Figure 5).

Figure 5 Classification diagram of the studied sandstones (fields after ref. [53]).
Figure 5

Classification diagram of the studied sandstones (fields after ref. [53]).

5 Geochemistry

5.1 Major elements

Table 2 lists the major element data that reflect the mineralogy of the studied samples. SiO2 content and the K2O/Na2O ratio in samples from the Wudanggou Formation are greater than those from the Changhangou Formation and Daqingshan Formation.

Table 2

Major element concentrations (wt%) of Jurassic strata in the Daqingshan area

LayerSamplesSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3FeOMgOCaONa2OK2OTiO2P2O5MnOLOITotalCIAICV
Daqingshan FormationSGX0161.7313.15 2.712.07 3.27 4.44 2.36 2.73 0.62 0.21 0.06 6.3899.73 63.80 1.23
SGX0260.0513.47 3.272.19 3.78 4.47 2.19 2.92 0.70 0.21 0.07 6.4899.80 64.90 1.29
SGX0364.1713.59 4.140.40 3.45 3.28 3.12 2.81 0.61 0.19 0.06 4.0199.83 61.30 1.28
SGX0463.5917.15 4.191.15 2.43 0.48 0.26 4.39 0.54 0.08 0.13 5.4299.81 77.90 0.72
SGL0165.3614.95 3.381.06 2.46 2.46 1.82 2.60 0.62 0.83 0.07 4.1399.75 68.50 0.89
Changhangou FormationSGX0511.812.76 0.442.52 5.84 37.88 0.51 0.58 0.12 0.77 0.47 36.1199.81 63.30 0.81
SGX0651.5718.61 8.430.60 2.95 1.67 4.15 2.83 1.09 0.13 0.03 7.7699.82 69.40 1.13
SGL0264.9416.55 3.2020.98 1.86 1.76 1.13 2.78 0.62 0.11 0.04 5.6199.58 76.70 0.75
SGL0353.4415.68 5.121.69 2.65 6.02 0.71 3.28 0.58 0.13 0.16 10.1699.62 77.50 1.29
SGL0458.9817.61 3.742.56 2.56 4.84 1.55 2.01 0.25 0.27 0.04 5.0799.48 77.50 1.01
Wudanggou FormationSGX0777.6512.68 0.630.20 0.08 0.32 1.55 3.31 0.77 0.10 0.01 2.4699.76 71.00 0.53
SGX0872.9411.31 0.791.07 0.38 3.30 1.59 3.75 0.24 0.05 0.05 4.2999.76 62.00 0.89
SGX0976.8411.56 2.210.48 0.16 0.36 1.84 3.15 0.55 0.12 0.05 2.3799.69 68.40 0.72
SGX1078.7910.16 0.890.05 0.07 1.62 1.61 3.70 0.14 0.05 0.09 2.699.77 60.00 0.79
SGX1173.5211.81 4.840.16 0.16 0.59 0.87 3.72 0.47 0.09 0.06 3.4599.74 70.80 0.90
SGX1269.0713.08 3.730.80 0.20 2.31 0.54 3.52 0.61 0.02 0.06 5.7999.73 74.00 0.83
SGL0574.0312.60 3.26 0.6040.48 1.26 1.53 3.13 0.46 0.09 0.06 2.3699.86 69.20 0.80
SGL0671.8114.04 2.66 1.2740.95 1.19 1.02 3.24 0.51 0.11 0.10 2.8799.77 73.40 0.68
SGL0772.9312.06 2.79 0.9910.69 1.19 1.66 3.32 0.45 0.08 0.04 3.5999.79 67.10 0.84

The SiO2/Al2O3 ratio reflects the abundance of quartz as well as clay and feldspar content, and the Na2O/K2O ratio is an index of chemical maturity [55]; however, the Fe2O3/K2O ratio enables better classification of arkoses and measured mineral stability [56]. The geochemical classification diagram revealed the samples from the Daqingshan Formation to be wackes (see Figure 6). The samples SGX05 and SGX06 from the Changhangou Formation are shales and/or mudstones, whereas other samples are wackes. The samples from the Wudanggou Formation are mainly arkose (see Figure 6). This suggests that the Jurassic sandstones were formed by rapid erosion, transport, and deposition.

Figure 6 Chemical classification diagrams discriminating according to logarithmic ratio of SiO2/Al2O3 vs Na2O/K2O (a: fields after ref. [55]) and Fe2O3/K2O (b: fields after ref. [56]).
Figure 6

Chemical classification diagrams discriminating according to logarithmic ratio of SiO2/Al2O3 vs Na2O/K2O (a: fields after ref. [55]) and Fe2O3/K2O (b: fields after ref. [56]).

5.2 Trace elements

Trace elements (particularly inactive ones) in rocks are usually well retained in the sediment during weathering and transportation; thus, the composition and content of trace elements in the sediments provide an effective way to trace the characteristics and structural features of the source rock [57,58].

A comparison of these Jurassic sediments with the average upper continental crust (UCC) [59] reveals that the concentration of the samples is lower except for Ni, Cr, and V in samples with the primitive mantle-normalized patterns (see Figure 7) [60]. Distribution curves of UUC and the samples are similar, indicating that the source is upper crust rocks.

Figure 7 Primitive mantle – normalized patterns of Jurassic strata in the Daqingshan area (mantle – normalized values from ref. [60], average compositions of UCC from ref. [59]).
Figure 7

Primitive mantle – normalized patterns of Jurassic strata in the Daqingshan area (mantle – normalized values from ref. [60], average compositions of UCC from ref. [59]).

5.3 Rare earth elements

Trace and REE composition of samples are listed in Table 2. The REE content in our samples ranged from 102.16 to 355.16 ppm with an average of 164.93 ppm, which is less than the range for Post-Archean Australian Shale (PAAS) [61] but greater than that of UCC [59]. The ratios of light rare earth elements (LREEs)/heavy rare earth elements (HREEs) and (La/Yb)n are 7.51–24.12 and 7.42–35.87, respectively.

In the PAAS – normalized plot, the samples from the Wudanggou Formation show a gentle pattern with pronounced positive Eu anomalies in contrast with those of the samples from the Changhangou Formation and Daqianshan Formation (see Figure 8b, d and f). The chondrite-normalized pattern of the samples shows high LREEs (see Figure 8a, c and e). Samples from the Wudanggou Formation show pronounced positive Eu anomalies (δEu = 1.23), whereas the samples from the Changhangou Formation show more pronounced negative Eu anomalies (δEu = 0.67) than the Daqingshan Formation samples (δEu = 0.86) (see Table 3). Eu is mainly enriched in plagioclase during magma differentiation but is relatively incompatible with other minerals [62]. The δEu value indicated that the source rock of the Changhangou Formation and Daqingshan Formation generally tends toward granitic. Rocks and source rocks of the Wudanggou Formation may be mixed with mafic components.

Figure 8 Chondrite and PAAS normalized REE patterns of Jurassic strata in the Daqingshan area. (a) REE normalized to chondrite for the Daqingshan Formation. (b) REE normalized to PAAS for the Daqingshan Formation. (c) REE normalized to chondrite for the Changhangou Formation. (d) REE normalized to PAAS for the Changhangou Formation. (e) REE normalized to chondrite for the Wudanggou Formation. (f) REE normalized to PAAS for the Wudanggou Formation. (chondrite-normalized values from ref. [1]; PAAS – normalized values from ref. [61]).
Figure 8

Chondrite and PAAS normalized REE patterns of Jurassic strata in the Daqingshan area. (a) REE normalized to chondrite for the Daqingshan Formation. (b) REE normalized to PAAS for the Daqingshan Formation. (c) REE normalized to chondrite for the Changhangou Formation. (d) REE normalized to PAAS for the Changhangou Formation. (e) REE normalized to chondrite for the Wudanggou Formation. (f) REE normalized to PAAS for the Wudanggou Formation. (chondrite-normalized values from ref. [1]; PAAS – normalized values from ref. [61]).

Table 3

Trace elements and rare earth elements concentrations in ppm on Jurassic strata in the Daqingshan area

LocationDaqingshan FormationChanghangou FormationWudanggou Formation
NoSGX01SGX02SGX03SGX04SGL01SGX05SGX06SGL02SGL03SGL04SGX07SGX08SGX09SGX10SGX11SGX12SGL05SGL06SGL07
Sr32229135763371691208470569228288318219307337283306289320
V75.881.071.610695.057.312513610510244.929.153.322.471.484.765.877.246.1
Nb10.111.49.6812.115.43.4119.816.712.314.512.54.248.782.608.839.819.298.107.29
Ba15021006798927789737689888831637143115861243144615061433937983891
B18.823.411.014343.23.9037.223.916.750.87.424.225.777.248.518.705.626.934.15
Th8.749.497.9515.133.39.4611.924.716.424.16.252.664.563.695.427.144.935.176.09
U1.131.351.071.792.723.601.192.791.172.460.750.290.560.520.661.000.560.780.69
Rb90.998.771.717774.534.414380.376.560.577.478.768.779.583.978.380.678.762.0
Sc10.813.29.7013.512.913.313.718.817.415.89.755.848.935.5313.411.56.368.907.22
Hf4.263.884.683.323.861.894.433.594.292.685.752.495.492.174.575.282.865.624.13
Ta0.440.540.390.560.480.480.930.580.830.680.480.240.310.100.280.350.320.250.29
Co15.717.413.68.7712.66.9020.724.425.324.34.4510.28.545.757.6812.17.267.335.91
Cr50.054.746.097.067.920.812893.310965.952.122.354.120.953.151.942.934.746.1
Ni29.335.224.932.426.916.951.545.540.636.57.0617.615.813.020.327.413.512.810.7
Zr13912415910513660.614816065.319120089.019275.216217887.211990.2
Y17.219.817.217.618.621.425.223.624.822.65.3214.59.8112.611.416.612.613.810.4
La25.435.135.536.829.423.474.958.336.733.727.625.132.523.135.640.227.926.434.7
Ce52.968.964.574.052.650.615711474.763.063.545.368.441.276.197.056.651.371.6
Pr6.548.748.529.417.586.5017.514.49.698.176.856.138.235.448.9211.05.986.908.32
Nd23.030.028.732.224.524.667.944.436.030.423.520.928.418.830.540.224.121.930.7
Sm4.325.334.945.694.844.9111.55.666.896.153.673.554.563.255.167.584.583.865.76
Eu1.451.461.411.131.081.122.261.101.281.311.301.851.641.731.962.411.391.171.43
Gd3.794.514.284.674.694.459.313.496.995.752.863.033.712.964.195.924.203.394.96
Tb0.600.710.630.710.650.711.280.340.970.790.340.460.500.460.570.820.620.440.79
Dy3.353.953.383.743.843.996.112.244.844.061.352.612.292.412.623.773.482.592.96
Ho0.640.740.640.680.770.761.070.401.190.880.230.480.420.440.480.660.650.520.69
Er1.852.141.821.931.952.092.971.283.392.150.631.311.121.161.351.781.811.501.96
Tm0.300.340.280.310.380.330.430.170.520.360.080.190.160.160.210.250.260.230.29
Yb1.892.111.751.871.652.132.551.053.152.350.521.080.920.911.361.581.771.521.76
Lu0.290.340.280.290.300.340.400.170.380.330.090.160.140.140.210.240.260.220.28
δEu1.100.910.940.670.690.730.670.760.560.671.231.721.221.701.291.100.970.990.82
δCe0.960.920.870.930.830.961.020.920.930.891.080.860.980.861.001.081.030.890.99
ΣREE126164157173134126355247187159133112153102169213134122166
LREE/HREE8.9410.111.011.28.437.5113.726.07.718.5620.711.015.510.814.413.29.2310.711.1
(La/Yb)n9.0811.213.713.312.17.4219.819.87.899.6935.915.723.917.217.717.210.711.713.3

δCe values can reflect the redox environment of sediments. Ce mainly exists as Ce3+ in the sediments; however, it is precipitated as Ce4+ in an oxidizing depositional environment, which is a negative δCe anomaly [62]. The δCe values of the Wudanggou Formation and Changhangou Formation ranged from 0.86 to 1.08 (see Table 3), reflecting a weak oxidation or weak reduction environment in the Early–Middle Jurassic. In contrast, the δCe of the Daqingshan Formation ranged from 0.83 to 0.96 (see Table 3), reflecting an oxidized environment in the late Jurassic.

6 Discussion

6.1 Weathering and sediment recycling

Weathering is controlled by tectonics, climate, and terrain. Rocks during weathering causes the depletion of alkalis and alkaline earth elements [63]. Therefore, the major and trace element compositions of clastic sedimentary rocks provide constraints on physical and chemical weathering as well as sedimentary environment [58].

Feldspar minerals and alkaline silicate minerals in the rocks of the upper crust often form clay minerals such as illite and kaolinite under weathering. The unstable elemental oxides (CaO, NaO, and K2O) are lost by weathering, whereas the content of relatively stable elemental oxides (Al2O3) is comparatively increased. The chemical index of alteration (CIA) [CIA = 100 × Al2O3/(Al2O3 + CaO* + Na2O + K2O)] reflects the quantity of weathering in the source area [64], where CaO* is the amount of CaO incorporated in the silicate mineral and was obtained herein by following MClennan’s method [58]. In general, CIA values range from 60 to 77.90 (see Table 2), indicating a low-moderate degree of chemical weathering in the source area. The effect of the CIA values on potassium metasomatism during diagenesis [65] can be evaluated using an Al2O3–(Na2O + CaO)–K2O diagram [64], in which weathering trends are parallel to the Al2O3–(Na2O + CaO) join, and deviations toward the K2O apex indicate metasomatism [66]. All samples analyzed herein plot parallel to the Al2O3–(Na2O + CaO) join (see Figure 9a), suggesting an intermediate degree of chemical weathering and weakly potassic metasomatism. All samples analyzed herein plot similar trends for granodiorite, adamellite, and granite, suggesting that the samples were derived from a felsic source area.

Figure 9 (a) A–CN–K ternary diagram of molecular proportions of Al2O3–(CaO + Na2O)–K2O for Jurassic sedimentary rock (fields after ref. [64]). Also plotted is the average continental crust [1]. Arrows 1–5 represent the weathering trends of gabbro, tonalite, granodiorite, adamellite and granite, respectively [64]. (b) Th/Sc vs Zr/Sc bivariate plot of Jurassic sedimentary rock (fields after ref. [58]).
Figure 9

(a) A–CN–K ternary diagram of molecular proportions of Al2O3–(CaO + Na2O)–K2O for Jurassic sedimentary rock (fields after ref. [64]). Also plotted is the average continental crust [1]. Arrows 1–5 represent the weathering trends of gabbro, tonalite, granodiorite, adamellite and granite, respectively [64]. (b) Th/Sc vs Zr/Sc bivariate plot of Jurassic sedimentary rock (fields after ref. [58]).

The index of compositional variability (ICV) can be used to evaluate sediment maturity [66,67,68]. The ICV can be calculated using the following equation: ICV = (Fe2O3 + K2O + Na2O + CaO + MgO + MnO + TiO2)/Al2O3. ICV values > 1 indicate the existence of few clay minerals in the sediments and the initial deposition in the active tectonic environment. ICV values < 1 are related to alteration products such as kaolinite and illite [69,70] indicating the recycling of sediments in a passive tectonic environment or first-cycle sedimentation under high weathering. The ICV values of the Wudanggou Formation range from 0.53 to 0.90 (avg. 0.78) (see Table 2), suggesting that samples were dominated by first-cycle sedimentation in weathering. However, the ICV values of the samples from the Changhangou Formation and Daqingshan Formation range from 0.75 to 1.29 (mean = 1.04), indicating the first-cycle sediment.

U-bearing minerals are easily dissolved during weathering, whereas Th remains relatively insoluble [71,72]. The Th/U ratios in our study samples (7.03–12.24) (see Table 3) are higher than the average values for the upper crust (3.8) [1], suggesting a moderate degree of chemical weathering. Because weathering and diagenesis often lead to significant increase in Rb/Sr ratios [58], the low Rb/Sr ratios of the samples herein (mean = 0.39) suggest a low-to-moderate level of weathering history.

Hydraulic sorting can significantly influence the chemical composition of terrigenous sediments [73,74,75,76]. Similarly, SiO2/Al2O3 ratios can be used to understand the textural maturity of sediments, with high values representing compositionally matured sediments [77]. The SiO2/Al2O3 ratios for the Daqingshan and Changhangou Formations vary within 2.77–4.72. In contrast, for the Wudanggou Formation, the SiO2/Al2O3 ratios vary within 5.11–7.75, with the higher ratios signifying the higher compositional maturity of the clastic rocks. A plot of Th/Sc against Zr/Sc can be used to distinguish the contrasting effects of source composition and sedimentary processes on the composition of clastic sedimentary rocks [58]; in such plots (see Figure 9b), all our study samples plot within the field for the upper crust. In general, the results indicate that all our samples are near-source and of low maturity.

Paleoplant fossils are direct evidence of the paleoclimate. Magpie and humid-climate plant fossils occur in the upper Wudanggou Formation, reflecting a warm and humid environment [47]. The Changhangou Formation contains fossils of freshwater fish and conchostracans, also reflecting a warm and humid climate [37]. The Daqingshan Formation primarily includes purple clastic rocks that indicate an arid climate and environment. Mg/Ca ratios also can be used to indicate the paleoclimate [78]; high values represent an arid climate, and low values indicate a wet climate. The Mg/Ca ratios of our samples from the Daqingshan Formation (0.62–4.2) are greater than the average of the samples from the Wudanggou and Changhangou Formations (mean = 0.47), suggesting that the Daqingshan Formation formed in a relatively arid environment.

6.2 Source area

6.2.1 Clastic composition of gravels

The composition of clastic rocks reflects the tectonic setting of a source area and sedimentary basin. The content of gravel with different components, sizes, and tendencies can be used to distinguish the lithology of the source, transportation distance, and paleocurrent.

The grain size of detrital materials on the Baicaigou section in the northern margin of the basin generally exhibited a decreasing trend from boulder conglomerate (North) to shale (South) (see Figure 3). The dip in imbricated gravel from the Daqingshan Formation on the north of the basin shows a dominant paleocurrent direction toward the south [79]. The dip in imbricated gravel and cross-stratification from the Baicaigou section shows a dominant paleocurrent direction toward the southwest [31]. The dip of cross-stratification from the Haimaban section and Yankeleng outcrop belt in the south of the basin show a dominant paleocurrent direction toward the northeast and northwest, respectively [31]. The results suggest sediment source from the northern and southern margins of the basin.

Gravel selected from the Jurassic strata was used for statistical analyses (see Figure 3). The bottom gravel of the Wudanggou Formation mainly contained gneiss together with a small amount of pegmatite, granite, and diabase. The conglomerate composition of the Changhangou Formation is complex, in which gneiss is the most abundant, followed by marble, few silicalites, and quartzite. The gravel composition of the Daqingshan Formation is mostly gneiss, followed by quartzite and silicalite. Thus, it can be inferred that the Archaean gneiss around the basin is one of the main provenance areas.

6.3 Geochemical

Most femic elements such as Fe, Ti, Mg, Sc, Co, Cr, Ni, and V in addition to small ionic elements such as Na, Ca, and Sr are enriched in basic rocks and their weathered products, whereas elements such as K, Rb, Pb, and REEs as well as high valence ions such as Th, U, Zr, and Nb are more enriched in felsic rocks and their weathered products [58]. The La/Sc, Th/Sc, La/Co, Th/Co, and Th/Cr ratios are particularly sensitive to the average source composition [1]. Some significant differences in elemental ratio populations from different areas exist, suggesting some local control of source rocks on sediment composition. The variable ratio suggests mainly the sediments of Jurassic sandstones originated from felsic sources (see Table 4).

Table 4

Range of elemental ratios of samples compared with ratios in similar fractions derived from felsic and mafic rocks and UCC [1]

Daqingshan Fm.Changhangou Fm.Wudanggou Fm.Sediments from felsic sourceSediments from mafic sourceUpper continent crust
La/Sc2.29–3.661.76–5.472.66–4.812.50–16.30.43–0.862.21
Th/Sc0.72–2.590.71–1.530.40–0.840.84–20.50.05–0.220.79
La/Co1.62–4.201.35–3.622.46–6.201.80–13.80.14–0.381.76
Th/Co0.55–2.650.65–1.370.26–1.400.67–19.40.04–1.400.63
Th/Cr0.16–0.490.09–0.450.08–0.180.067–4.00.002–0.0450.13

Ni (ppm) vs TiO2 (wt%) indicates that the analyzed samples plot predominantly to the field of felsic area rather than those of mafic igneous or sedimentary origin (see Figure 10a) [80]. On the plot of La/Sc vs Co/Th (see Figure 10b), the Co/Th ratios of all studied samples are nearly 1.27 and close to those of felsic volcanic rocks [1]. Floyd and Leveridge established a discrimination diagram using La/Th vs Hf (see Figure 10c) to determine different arc components and sources [81]. Uniform low La/Th ratios and Hf contents of samples from the Changhangou and Daqingshan Formations suggest derivation, predominantly from a felsic arc source, whereas the samples from the Wudanggou Formation were controlled by a mixed felsic and mafic source.

Figure 10 Source rock discrimination diagrams with trace elements for Jurassic strata in the Daqingshan area. (a) TiO2 vs Ni diagram (fields after ref. [82]); (b) Co/Th vs La/Sc diagram (fields after ref. [83]); (c) La/Th vs Hf diagram (fields after ref. [81]); (d) La/Yb vs ∑REE diagram (fields after ref. [81]). Average compositions of volcanic rocks in plot (b) from ref. [84]).
Figure 10

Source rock discrimination diagrams with trace elements for Jurassic strata in the Daqingshan area. (a) TiO2 vs Ni diagram (fields after ref. [82]); (b) Co/Th vs La/Sc diagram (fields after ref. [83]); (c) La/Th vs Hf diagram (fields after ref. [81]); (d) La/Yb vs ∑REE diagram (fields after ref. [81]). Average compositions of volcanic rocks in plot (b) from ref. [84]).

REEs exhibit similar chemical properties, mainly controlled by the rock components in the source area and are weakly affected by weathering, diagenesis, and alteration; in addition, they can reflect the REE characteristics of the source rocks [1,64]. The relationship between the La/Yb ratio and ∑REE content can reflect the genetic characteristics of rock types [58]. The La/Yb–∑REE diagram (see Figure 10d) shows that most samples plot to the sedimentary rock area and sedimentary rock–granite overlap area in addition to few plots in the granite area, indicating that the basin source mainly originates from the upper crust felsic source area.

6.4 Tectonic setting

The geochemical characteristics of sediments are closely related to their provenance and tectonic setting. The geochemical composition of the sedimentary rocks is formed under different tectonic settings. Although some established discrimination diagrams are not really significant for specific local plate tectonic settings [85], the geochemical compositions of sediments have been widely used to infer the plate tectonic setting of ancient sedimentary basins [1,56,86,87].

Comparison between the distribution curve of chondrite normalized to the REE average value and four typical tectonic backgrounds [88] shows that the source area exhibited similar continental island arc and/or active continental margin tectonic setting (see Figure 11a).

Figure 11 (a) Comparison diagram of chondrite-normalized REE patterns of Jurassic strata in the Daqingshan area and various tectonic setting (fields after ref. [89]); (b) discriminant function diagram (fields after ref. [89]); (c) K2O/Na2O vs SiO2 diagram (fields after ref. [85]); (d) Si02/Al2O3 vs K2O/Na2O diagram (fields after ref. [90]). ACM = active continental margin; PM = passive continental margin; CIA = continental island arc; OIA = oceanic island arc; A1 = evolved arc setting, with supply of felsic–plutonic detritus; A2 = arc setting, with supply of basaltic and andesitic detritus discriminant functions are: Df1 = −0.0447 × SiO2 − 0.972 × TiO2 + 0.008 × Al2O3 + 0.267 × Fe2O3 + 0.208 × FeO − 3.082 × MnO + 0.14 × MgO + 0.195 × CaO + 0.719 × Na2O − 0.032 × K2O + 7.510 × P2O5 + 0.303; Df2 = −0.421 × SiO2 + 1.988 × TiO2 − 0.526 × Al2O3 − 0.551 × Fe2O3 − 1.61 × FeO + 2.72 × MnO + 0.881 × MgO − 0.90 × CaO − 0.177 × Na2O − 1.84 × K2O + 7.244 × P2O5 + 43.57.
Figure 11

(a) Comparison diagram of chondrite-normalized REE patterns of Jurassic strata in the Daqingshan area and various tectonic setting (fields after ref. [89]); (b) discriminant function diagram (fields after ref. [89]); (c) K2O/Na2O vs SiO2 diagram (fields after ref. [85]); (d) Si02/Al2O3 vs K2O/Na2O diagram (fields after ref. [90]). ACM = active continental margin; PM = passive continental margin; CIA = continental island arc; OIA = oceanic island arc; A1 = evolved arc setting, with supply of felsic–plutonic detritus; A2 = arc setting, with supply of basaltic and andesitic detritus discriminant functions are: Df1 = −0.0447 × SiO2 − 0.972 × TiO2 + 0.008 × Al2O3 + 0.267 × Fe2O3 + 0.208 × FeO − 3.082 × MnO + 0.14 × MgO + 0.195 × CaO + 0.719 × Na2O − 0.032 × K2O + 7.510 × P2O5 + 0.303; Df2 = −0.421 × SiO2 + 1.988 × TiO2 − 0.526 × Al2O3 − 0.551 × Fe2O3 − 1.61 × FeO + 2.72 × MnO + 0.881 × MgO − 0.90 × CaO − 0.177 × Na2O − 1.84 × K2O + 7.244 × P2O5 + 43.57.

Bhatia developed useful and effective discriminant functions to infer tectonic settings [88]. All samples from the Wudangghou Formation plot in the active continental margin, whereas the samples from the Changhangou and Daqingshan Formations mainly plot in the continental island arc and active continental margin (see Figure 11b). Roser and Korsem used the K2O/Na2O vs SiO2 to resolve the tectonic setting of clastic sedimentary rocks [85]. SiO2 and K2O/Na2O increase from the volcanic arc to the active continental margin to the passive margin situation. All samples from the Wudangghou Formation fall into the passive continental margin field, whereas the samples from the Changhangou and Daqingshan Formations mainly fall into the passive and active continental margin (see Figure 11c). On a plot of K2O/Na2O vs SiO2/Al2O3 (see Figure 11d), samples from the Wudangghou Formation fall into the field of a passive continental margin, in contrast, the samples from the Changhangou and Daqingshan Formations mainly fall into the passive and active continental margins.

Some trace elements in sediments are inactive and exhibit slight changes during the deposition process. The source rock and weathering conditions are the main factors controlling the trace elements in the sediments. Some of these elements can reflect the tectonic setting of the sedimentary basin [2]. La, Th, Zr, Nb, Y, Sc, Co, and Ti are highly effective for distinguishing different tectonic settings [57]. Co, Sc, and Zr exhibit good stability. Sc and Co are compatible elements, demonstrating a good correlation, representing the immature tectonic background. The large ion lithophile element Th represents the immature tectonic background, and Zr indicates sedimentation degree [57]. Th–Sc–Zr/10, Th–Co–Zr/10, and La–Th–Sc discriminant diagrams show that most of the samples plot to the continental island arc field, few plot to the active continent margin, and some samples plot to the blank area around the continental island arc and active continent margin [50]. In general, source regions mainly exhibit continental island arc and/or active continental margins (see Figure 12). Tectonic setting discriminant diagrams based on the major element are different from those of the trace elements and REEs. K2O and Na2O are easily lost during weathering, whereas REEs and Th, Co, and Zr are relatively stable. Comprehensive analysis suggests that the source rock is mainly from active continental margins and continental island arc. This further suggests that the samples were derived from complex source regions.

Figure 12 Tectonic setting discrimination diagrams with trace elements for the Jurassic strata in the Daqingshan area (fields after ref. [57]). (a) Th–Sc–Zr/10 plots; (b) Th–Co–Zr/10 plots; (c) La–Th–Zr/10 plots. OIA = oceanic island arc; CIA = continental island arc; ACM = active continental margin; PM = passive margin.
Figure 12

Tectonic setting discrimination diagrams with trace elements for the Jurassic strata in the Daqingshan area (fields after ref. [57]). (a) Th–Sc–Zr/10 plots; (b) Th–Co–Zr/10 plots; (c) La–Th–Zr/10 plots. OIA = oceanic island arc; CIA = continental island arc; ACM = active continental margin; PM = passive margin.

The northern margin of the NCC has experienced a history of continental margin evolution on the south side of the Ancient Asian Ocean from Neoarchean to Late Paleozoic [51,91,92]. U–Pb dating of zircons revealed multiple magmatic age peaks at ca. 2,450–2,500, 2,100–2,300, 1,930–1,970, and 1,850 Ma, and metamorphic ages at ca. 1,900 Ma, indicating multiple magmatic and metamorphic events in the Daqingshan–Wulashan area [27,93]. The Khondalite belt underwent long-term arc – continent accretion along the southern margin of the Yinshan Block during the late Neoarchean–Paleoproterozoic, and terminal continent – continent collision of the Yinshan and Ordos Blocks at ca. 1.90–1.95 Ga [20,25,26,27,94,95]. Therefore, we infer that the Archean–Proterozoic basement provided continental island arc material for the basin. The Early Paleozoic Bainaimiao arc belt was built on a Precambrian microcontinent that has a tectonic affinity to the Tarim or Yangtze Cratons and was accreted to the northern NCC during the Late Silurian–Early Devonian by arc–continent collision [96]. The northern margin of the NCC has changed from passive to active continental margin. Additionally, massive I-type intrusion and volcanism during Carboniferous–Permian time indicates that the northern margin of the NCC is an Andean-type active continental margin and the locus of southward subduction of the Paleo-Asian oceanic plate beneath the northern NCC [97,98]. We infer that Carboniferous–Permian volcanic rocks have provided material for the basin’s active continental margins.

7 Conclusion

The following are the conclusions drawn from the field interaction, petrography, and geochemistry studies of the samples:

The average modal composition classifies the samples as wacke or arkose and is also supported by geochemical studies. The Jurassic strata generally exhibit a low-to-medium degree of weathering, with near source and low maturity. The Wudanggou and Changhangou Formations areas exhibit a warm and humid environment, whereas the Daqingshan Formation showed an acidic environment. The chondrite-normalized pattern of the samples shows high LREE content. Samples from the Wudanggou Formation show pronounced positive Eu anomalies, and samples from the Changhangou and Daqingshan Formations exhibit pronounced negative Eu anomalies.

Petrographic and geochemical data obtained from the studied samples indicate that felsic volcanic rocks and the Precambrian basement were the most important source rock for all samples; however, few mafic materials may have been contributed to the Wudanggou Formation. The geochemical information interpretation on various diagrams reveals the source material to be from the active continent margin and continental island arc settings. The Archean–Proterozoic basement provides material for the basin as continental island arc, and Carboniferou–Permian volcanic rocks provide material for the basin as active continental margins.

The Changhangou Formation unconformably overlies the Wudanggou Formation and with different petrological and geochemical, source areas, and tectonic settings. This shows that the Yanshanian movement influenced the formation of the Changhangou formation and the initiation of the Yanshanian movement should be earlier than 163.7 ± 1.0 Ma, rather than the end of the Middle Jurassic.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely appreciate the editors and reviewers for constructive comments. We also thank Dr. Chio Taejin who critically read the early draft and helped with geochemical analyzes. This study was financially supported by the Geological Investigation Project of Inner Mongolia (NMKD2013-24) and the PM60040 Research grant from the Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST).

  1. Author contributions: Conceptualization, Zhang, MJ, Yu, YQ; Methodology, Zhang, MJ, and Cai, K and Shi, MY; Visualization, Zhang, MJ, Yu, YQ; Writing-original draft preparation, Zhang, MJ; Writing-review and editing, Choi, JY, Cai, K; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. This work represents part of Zhang, MJ.′s Doctorate Research performed at the Kunshan National University.

References

[1] Taylor SR, McLennan SM. The continental crust: Its composition and evolution. An Examination of the Geochemical Record Preserved in Sedimentary Rocks. Oxford: Oxford University, Blackwell Scientific Pub; 1985. p. 312.10.1017/CBO9780511575358.014Search in Google Scholar

[2] McLennan SM, Taylor SR. Sedimentary rocks and crustal evolution: tectonic setting and secular trends. J Geol. 1991;99(1):1–21.10.1086/629470Search in Google Scholar

[3] Critelli S, Arribas J, Le Pera E, Tortosa A, Marsaglia KM, Latter KK. The recycled orogenic sand provenance from an uplifted thrust-belt, Betic Cordillera, southern Spain. J Sediment Res. 2003;73(1):72–81.10.1306/071002730072Search in Google Scholar

[4] Critelli S. Provenance of Mesozoic to Cenozoic Circum-Mediterranean sandstones in relation to tectonic setting. Earth-Science Rev. 2018;85:624–48.10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.07.001Search in Google Scholar

[5] Davis GA, Wang C, Zheng YD, Zhang JJ, Zhang CH, Gehrels GE. The enigmatic Yinshan fold-and-thrust belt of Northern China: New views on its intraplate contractional styles. Geology. 1998;26(1):43.10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0043:TEYFAT>2.3.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[6] Davis GA, Darby BJ, Zheng YD, Spell TL. Geometric and temporal evolution of an extensional detachment fault, hohhot metamorphic core complex, Inner Mongolia, China. Geology. 2002;30(11):1003–6.10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<1003:GATEOA>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[7] Chen ZY, Wen CS, Zhang WJ. Nappe structure in Mount Seerteng. Inn Mong Earth Sci. 2000;25:237–41 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[8] Liu ZH, Xu ZY, Yang ZS. On Dagingshang thrust – nappe in Inner MongoIia. RegionaI GeoIogy China. 1999;18(4):366–72 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[9] Liu ZH, Xu ZY, Yang ZS. Daqingshan thrust system signification and its geological characteristics. World Geology. 2001;3:224–30 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[10] Xu ZY, Liu ZH, Yang ZS, Wu XW, Chen XF. Structure of metamorphic strata of the khondalite series in the Daqingshan-Wulashan area, central Inner Mongolia, China, and their geodynamic implications. Geol Bull China. 2007;26(5):526–36 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[11] Cai J, Liu PH, Liu FL, Liu JH, Wang FL, Shi JR. Genetic mineralogy and metamorphic evolution of Al-rich gneisses in the Shiguai area, Daqingshan-Wulashan metamorphic complex belt. Acta Petrologica Sin. 2013;29(2):437–61 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[12] Song HF, Xu ZY, Liu ZH. Geochemical characteristics and origin of garnet migmatitic granites in Daqingshan area. Inn Mong Acta Petrologica Et Mineralogica. 2005;24(5):489–95 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[13] Xu ZY, Liu ZH, Hu FX, Yang ZS. Geochemical characteristics of the calc-silicate rocks in khondalite series in Daqingshan area. Inn Mong J Jilin Univ (Earth Sci Ed). 2005;35(6):681–9 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[14] Zhong CT, Deng JF, Wu YP, Mao DB, Xi Z, Cheng B. Geochemical characteristics and tectonic significations of Paleoproterozoic strongly peraluminous granitoids in the central segment of the northern margin of the North China Craton. Geol Bull China. 2006;25(3):389–97 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[15] Tao JX. Characteristics of Neoarchean metamorphic intrusives and the relationship with the mineralization of gold in Guyang region, Inner Mongolia. Geological Survey. Research. 2003;26(1):21–6 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[16] Jian P, Zhang QC, Liu DY, Jin WJ, Jia XQ, Qian Q. SHRIMP dating and geological significance of Late Achaean high-Mg diorite (sanukite) and hornblende-granite at Guyang of Inner Mongolia. Acta Petrologica Sin. 2005;21(1):151–7 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[17] Wu CH, Sun M, Li HM, Zhao GC, Xia XP. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb zircon ages of the khondalites from the Wulashan and Jining high-grade terrain in northern margin of the North China Craton: Constraints on sedimentary age of the khondalite. Acta Petrologica Sin. 2006;22(11):2639–54 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[18] Xia XP, Sun M, Zhao GC, Wu FY, Xu P, Zhang JH, et al. U–Pb and Hf isotopic study of detrital zircons from the Wulashan khondalites: constraints on the evolution of the Ordos Terrane, Western Block of the North China Craton. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2006;241(3–4):581–93.10.1016/j.epsl.2005.11.024Search in Google Scholar

[19] Ma MZ, Wan YS, Santosh M, Xu ZY, Xie HQ, et al. Decoding multiple tectonothermal events in zircons from single rock samples: SHRIMP zircon U-Pb data from the late Neoarchean rocks of Daqingshan, North China Craton. Gondwana Res. 2012;22(3–4):810–27.10.1016/j.gr.2012.02.020Search in Google Scholar

[20] Dong CY, Wan YS, Wilde SA, Xu ZY, Ma MZ, Xie HQ, et al. Earliest Paleoproterozoic supracrustal rocks in the North China Craton recognized from the Daqingshan area of the Khondalite belt: Constraints on craton evolution. Gondwana Res. 2014;25(4):1535–53.10.1016/j.gr.2013.05.021Search in Google Scholar

[21] Dong CY, Wan YS, Long T, Zhang YH, Liu JH, Ma MZ, et al. Oxygen isotopic compositions of zircons from Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks in the Daqingshan-Jining area, North China Craton: In situ SHRIMP analysis. Acta Petrologica Sin. 2016;32:659–81 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[22] Hu B, Zhai MG, Peng P, Liu F, Diwu CR, Wang HZ, et al. Late Paleoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic geological events of the North China Craton: Evidences from LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology of detrital zircons from the Cambrian and Jurassic sedimentary rocks in Western Hills of Beijing. Acta Petrologica Sin. 2013;29(7):2508–36 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[23] Wan YS, Xu ZY, Dong CY, Nutman A, Ma MZ, Xie HQ, et al. Episodic Paleoproterozoic (2.45, 1.95 and 1.85 Ga) mafic magmatism and associated high temperature metamorphism in the Daqingshan area, North China Craton: SHRIMP zircon U–Pb dating and whole-rock geochemistry. Precambrian Res. 2013;224:71–93.10.1016/j.precamres.2012.09.014Search in Google Scholar

[24] Liu JH, Liu FL, Ding ZJ, Chen JQ, Liu PH, Shi JR, et al. Zircon U-Pb chronology, geochemistry and their petrogenesis of Early Paleoproterozoic granitoid gneisses in Ulashan area, North China Craton. Acta Petrologica Sin. 2013;29(2):485–500 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[25] Liu JH, Liu FL, Ding ZJ, Chen JQ, Liu PH, Cheng JQ, et al. Late Neoarchean–Paleoproterozoic arc-continent accretion along the Khondalite Belt, Western Block, North China Craton: Insights from granitoid rocks of the Daqingshan–Wulashan area. Precambrian Res. 2017;303:494–519.10.1016/j.precamres.2017.06.006Search in Google Scholar

[26] Liu PH, Liu FL, Cai J, Liu JH, Shi JR, Wang F. Geochronological and geochemical study of the Lijiazi mafic granulites from the Daqingshan-Wulashan metamorphic complex, the central Khondalite Belt in the North China Craton. Acta Petrologica Sin. 2013;29(2):922–42.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Liu PH, Liu FL, Liu CH, Liu JH, Wang F, Xiao LL, et al. Multiple mafic magmatic and high-grade metamorphic events revealed by zircons from meta-mafic rocks in the Daqingshan–Wulashan Complex of the Khondalite Belt, North China Craton. Precambrian Res. 2014;246:334–57.10.1016/j.precamres.2014.02.015Search in Google Scholar

[28] Liu PH, Liu FL, Cai J, Yang H, Wang F, Liu CH, et al. Metamorphic P-T conditions and timing of the Wuchuan garnet mafic granulite from the Yinshan Block, North China Craton: Insight from phase equilibria and zircon U-Pb dating. Acta Petrologica Sin. 2016;32(7):1949–79 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[29] Cai J, Liu FL, Liu PH, Wang F, Shi JR. Geochronology of the Paleoproterozoic khondalite rocks from the Wulashan-Daqingshan area, the Khondalite Belt. Acta Petrologica Sin. 2015;31(10):3081–106 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[30] Chen PJ, Dai CC, Huang C, Huang XL. Geochemical characteristics and zircon U-Pb age of the Paleoproterozic S-type granite in Wulashan region and its geological significance. Geol China. 2017;44(5):959–73 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[31] Ritts D, Darby BJ, Cope T. EarIy Jurassic extensionaI basin formation in the Daqing shan segment of Yinshan belt, Northern North China BIock, Inner MongoIia. Tectonophysics. 2001;339:239–58.10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00115-9Search in Google Scholar

[32] Liu ZH, Xu ZY. Indosinian Tectonic Movement in the Daqingshan Region in Inner Mongolia. Geol Rev. 2003;49(5):457–63 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[33] Peng XD, Xu ZY, Liu ZH. The Formation, Movement and Evolution Pattern of Jurassic Terrestrial Deposit Basin in Daqingshan Region. Word Geol. 2001;4(2):105–10.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Xu XJ, Zhao YJ. Discussion on the Formation and Origin of the Shiguai Mesozoic Rift Basin in Inner Mongolia. J Jiling Univ (Earth ence Ed). 2005;1:33–8 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[35] Zhao Y, Zhang SH, Xu G, Yang ZY, Hu JM. The Jurassic major tectonic events of the yanshan intraplate deformation belt. Regional Geol China. 2004;23(9–10):854–63.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Zhao Y, Zhai MG, Chen H, Zhang SH. Paleozoic-early Jurassic tectonic evolution of North China Craton and its adjacent orogenic belts. Geol China. 2017;44(1):44–60 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[37] Wang Y, Dong S, Shi W, Chen X, Jia L. The Jurassic structural evolution of the western Daqingshan area, Eastern Yinshan belt, North China. Int Geol Rev. 2017;59(15):1–23.10.1080/00206814.2017.1300784Search in Google Scholar

[38] Zhang JJ, Qi GW, Guo L, Liu J. 40Ar–39Ar dating of the mesozoic thrusting in Daqingshan thrust-nappe system, Inner Mongolia, China. Acta Petrologica Sin. 2009;25(3):609–20 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[39] Zhao GC, Sun M, Wilde SA, Li SZ. Late Archean to Paleoproterozoic evolution of the North China Craton: Key issues revisited. Precambrian Res. 2005;136(2):177–202.10.1016/j.precamres.2004.10.002Search in Google Scholar

[40] Du JM, Zhang QL, Xu SY, Du SX. Characters of later Jurassic Yinshan intraplate orogeny belt-evidence from Daqing Shan. Inn Mong Acta Geologica Sin. 2009;83(7):910–922 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[41] Darby BJ, Davis GA, Zheng YD. Structural evolution of the southwestern Daqing Shan, Yinshan Belt, Inner Mongolia. China, Geol Soc Am Mem. 2001;194:199–214.10.1130/0-8137-1194-0.199Search in Google Scholar

[42] Zhang SH, Zhao Y, Ye H, Hou KJ, Li CF. Early Mesozoic alkaline complexes in the northern North China craton: Implications for cratonic lithospheric destruction. Lithos. 2012;155:1–18.10.1016/j.lithos.2012.08.009Search in Google Scholar

[43] Liu SF, Su S, Zhang GW. Early Mesozoic basin development in North China: Indications of cratonic deformation. J Asian Earth Sci. 2013;62:221–36.10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.09.011Search in Google Scholar

[44] Li ZH, Dong SW, Qu HJ. Timing of the initiation of the Jurassic Yanshan movement on the North China craton: Evidence from sedimentary cycles, heavy minerals, geochemistry, and zircon U–Pb geochronology. Int Geol Rev. 2013;56:288–312.10.1080/00206814.2013.855013Search in Google Scholar

[45] Meng QR, Wei HH, Wu GL, Duan L. Early Mesozoic tectonic settings of the northern North China craton. Tectonophysics. 2014;611:155–66.10.1016/j.tecto.2013.11.015Search in Google Scholar

[46] Liu J, Zhao Y, Liu XM, Wang Y, Liu XW. Rapid exhumation of basement rocks along the northern margin of the North China craton in the Early Jurassic: Evidence from the Xiabancheng Basin, Yanshan Tectonic Belt. Basin Res. 2012;24:544–58.10.1111/j.1365-2117.2011.00538.xSearch in Google Scholar

[47] Li ZH, Feng SB, Yuan XQ, Qu HJ. Chronology and its significance of the Lower Jurassic tuff in Ordos Bain and its periphery. Oil Gas Geology. 2014;35:729–41 (In Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[48] Ge YH, Sun CL, Wang YF. The flora from Zhaogou Formation in Shiguai basin, Inner Mongolia and the geological age. Global Geology. 2010;29:175–82 (In Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[49] Zhang H, Yuan HL, Hu ZC, Liu XM, Diwu CR. U-Pb zircon dating of the Mesozoic volcanic strata in Luanping of North Hebei and its significance. Earth Sci. 2005;6:707–20 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[50] Shao JA, Meng QR, Wei HQ, Zhang LQ, Wang PY. Nature and tectonic environment of late Jurassic volcanic-sedimentary basins in northwestern hebei province. Regional Geol China. 2003;22(10):751–61 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[51] Xu H, Liu YQ, Kuang HW, Liu YX, Peng N, Dong C, et al. Sedimentay provenance and basin evolution of Daqingshan Formation. Houcheng Formation Tuchengzi Formation Yinshan-Yanshan area Geol Bull China. 2013;32(2):502–24 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[52] Ingersoll RV, Bullard TF, Ford RL, Grimm JP, Pickle JD, Sares SW. The effect of grain size on detrital modes; a test of the Gazzi-Dickinson pointcounting method. Sediment Res. 1984;54(1):103–16.Search in Google Scholar

[53] Folk RL, Andews PB, Lewis DW. Detrital sedimentary rock classificationand nomenclature for use in New Zealand. New Zealand J Geol Geophys. 1970;13:937–68.10.1080/00288306.1970.10418211Search in Google Scholar

[54] Dickinson WR, Beard LS, Brakenridge GR, Erjavec JL, Ferguson RC, Inman KF, et al. Provenance of North American Phanerozoic sandstones in relation to tectonic setting. GSA. 1983;94:222–35.10.1130/0016-7606(1983)94<222:PONAPS>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[55] Pettijohn FJ, Potter PE, Siever R. Sand and Sandstone. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1972. p. 618.10.1007/978-1-4615-9974-6Search in Google Scholar

[56] Herron MM. Geochemical classification of terrigenous sands and shales from core or log data. J Sediment Petrology. 1988;58:820–29.Search in Google Scholar

[57] Bhatia MR, Crook KAW. Trace element characteristics of graywackes and tectonic setting discrimination of sedimentary basins. Contributions mineralogy petrology. 1986;92(2):181–93.10.1007/BF00375292Search in Google Scholar

[58] McLennan SM, Hemming S, McDaniel DK, Hanson GN. Geochemical approaches to sedimentation, provenance and tectonics. Processes Controlling the Composition of Clastic Sediments; 1993.10.1130/SPE284-p21Search in Google Scholar

[59] Taylor SR, McLennan SM. Composition and evolution of the continental crust: rare earth element evidence from sedimentary rocks [and discussion]. Philos Trans R Soc A: Mathematical, Phys Eng Sci. 1981;301:399–99.Search in Google Scholar

[60] Sun SS, McDonough WF. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes. Geol Society, Lond Spec Publ. 1989;42:313–45.10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19Search in Google Scholar

[61] McLennan SM. Rare-earth elements in sedimentary rocks: influence of provenance and sedimentary processes. Geochem Mineralogy Rare Earth Elem. 1989;21:169–200.10.1515/9781501509032-010Search in Google Scholar

[62] Wang ZG, Yu XY, Zhao ZH. Rare Earth Element Geochemistry. Beijing: Science Press (in chinese); 1989.Search in Google Scholar

[63] Armstrong-Altrin JS, Lee YI, Verma SP, Ramasamy S. Geochemistry of sandstones from the Upper Miocene Kudankulam Formation, southern India: implications for provenance, weathering, and tectonic setting. J Sediment Res. 2004;74:285–97.10.1306/082803740285Search in Google Scholar

[64] Nesbitt HW, Young GM. Prediction of some weathering trends of plutonic and volcanic rocks based on thermodynamic and kinetic considerations. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1984;48:1523–34.10.1016/0016-7037(84)90408-3Search in Google Scholar

[65] Fedo CM, Nesbitt HW, Young GM. Unraveling the effects of potassium metasomatism in sedimentary rocks and paleosols, with implications for paleoweathering conditions and provenance. Geology. 1995;23:921–24.10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<0921:UTEOPM>2.3.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[66] Monghaddam SP, Salehi MA, Jafarzadeh M, Zohdi A. Provenance, palaeoweathering and tectonic setting of the ediacaran bayandor formation in nw iran: implications for the northern gondwana continental margin during the late neoproterozoic. J Afr Earth Sci. 2020;161:103670.1–103670.16.10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2019.103670Search in Google Scholar

[67] Scarciglia F, Le Pera E, Critelli S. The onset of sedimentary cycle in a mid-latitude upland environment: weathering, pedogenesis and geomorphic processes on plutonic rocks (Sila Massif, Calabria). In: Arribas J, Critelli S, Johnsson M, editors. Sedimentary Provenance: Petrographic and Geochemical Perspectives. Geological Society of America Special Paper. vol. 420; 2007. p. 149–66.10.1130/2006.2420(10)Search in Google Scholar

[68] Salehi MA, Mazroei Sebdani Z, Pakzad HR, Bahrami A, Fürsich FT, Heubeck C. Provenance and palaeogeography of uppermost Triassic and Lower Cretaceous terrigenous rocks of central Iran: reflection of the Cimmerian events. Neues Jahrb Geol Palaontol Abh. 2018;288(1):49–77.10.1127/njgpa/2018/0723Search in Google Scholar

[69] Van de Kamp PC, Leake BE, Bernard E. Petrography and geochemistry of feldspathic and mafic sediments of the northeastern Pacific margin. Earth Environ Sci Trans R Soc Edinb. 1985;76(4):411–49.10.1017/S0263593300010646Search in Google Scholar

[70] Barshad I. The effect of a variation in precipitation on the nature of clay mineral formation in soils from acid and basic igneous rocks. Proceedings International Clay Conference. Jerusalem: 1966. p. 167–73.Search in Google Scholar

[71] Baker RJ. Uranium minerals and their relevance to long term storage of nuclearfuels. Coord Chem Rev. 2014;266–267:123–36.10.1016/j.ccr.2013.10.004Search in Google Scholar

[72] Boekhout F, Gerard M, Kanzari A, Michel A, Dejeant A, Galoisy L, et al. Uranium migration and retention during weathering of a granitic wasterock pile. Appl Geochem. 2015;58:123–35.10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.02.012Search in Google Scholar

[73] Garcia D, Ravenne C, Maréchal B, Moutte J. Geochemical variability induced by entrainment sorting: Quantified signals for provenance analysis. Sediment Geol. 2004;171(1–4):113–28.10.1016/j.sedgeo.2004.05.013Search in Google Scholar

[74] Armstrong-Altrin JS. Provenance of sands from Cazones, Acapulco, and Bahía Kino beaches, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas. 2009;26(3):764–82.Search in Google Scholar

[75] Etemad-Saeed N, Hosseini-Barzi M, Armstrong-Altrin JS. Petrography and geochemistry of clastic sedimentary rocks as evidences for provenance of the lower cambrian lalun formation, posht-e-badam block, central iran. J Afr Earth ences. 2011;61(2):142–59.10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2011.06.003Search in Google Scholar

[76] Zaid SM. Geochemistry of sandstones from the pliocene gabir formation, north marsa alam, red sea, egypt: Implication for provenance, weathering and tectonic setting. J Afr Earth Sci. 2015;102(feb):1–17.10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.10.016Search in Google Scholar

[77] Ahmad I, Chandra R. Geochemistry of loess-paleosol sediments of Kashmir Valley, India: provenance and weathering. J Asian Earth Sci. 2013;66:73–89.10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.12.029Search in Google Scholar

[78] Song MS. sedimentary environment geochemistry in the shasi section of southern ramp,dongying depression. Miner Pet. 2005;25(1):67–73 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[79] Xu H, Liu YQ, Liu YX, Kuang HW. Stratigraphy, sedimentology and tectonic background of basin evolution of the Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous Tuchengzi Formation in Yinshan-Yanshan, North China. Earth Sci Front. 2011;18(4):88–106 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[80] Maynard JB, Valloni R, Yu HS. Composition of modern deep-sea sands from arc-related basins. Geol Soci Lond Spec Publ. 1982;10(1):551–61.10.1144/GSL.SP.1982.010.01.36Search in Google Scholar

[81] Floyd PA, Leveridge BE. Tectonic environment of the devonian gramscatho basin, south cornwall: Framework mode and geochemical evidence from turbidite sandstones. J Geol Soc Lond. 1987;144(4):531–42.10.1144/gsjgs.144.4.0531Search in Google Scholar

[82] Floyd PA, Winchester JA, Park RG. Geochemistry and tectonic setting of lewisian clastic metasediments from the early proterozoic loch maree group of gairloch, nw scotland. Precambrian Res. 1989;45(1–3):203–14.10.1016/0301-9268(89)90040-5Search in Google Scholar

[83] Gu XX, Liu JM, Zheng MH, Tang JX, Qi L. Provenance and tectonic setting of the proterozoic turbidites in Hunan, south China: Geochemical evidence. J Sediment Res. 2002;72(3):393–407.10.1306/081601720393Search in Google Scholar

[84] Condie KC. Chemical composition and evolution of the upper continental crust: Contrasting results from surface samples and shales. Chem Geol. 1993;104(1–4):37.10.1016/0009-2541(93)90140-ESearch in Google Scholar

[85] Roser BP, Korsch RJ. Determination of tectonic setting of sandstone-mudstone suites using SiO2 content and K2O/Na2O ratio. J Geol. 1986;94(5):635–50.10.1086/629071Search in Google Scholar

[86] Mader D, Neubauer F. Provenance of Palaeozoic sandstones from the Carnic Alps (Austria): Petrographic and geochemical indicators. Int J Earth Sci. 2004;93(2):262–81.10.1007/s00531-004-0391-xSearch in Google Scholar

[87] Guo QQ, Xiao WJ, Windley BF, Mao QG, Han CM, Qu JF, et al. Provenance and tectonic settings of Permian turbidites from the Beishan Mountains, NW China: Implications for the Late Paleozoic accretionary tectonics of the southern Altaids. J Asian Earth Sci. 2012;49:54–68.10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.03.013Search in Google Scholar

[88] Bhatia MR. Rare earth element geochemistry of Australian Paleozoic graywackes and mudrocks: Provenance and tectonic control. Sediment Geol. 1985;45(1–2):97–113.10.1016/0037-0738(85)90025-9Search in Google Scholar

[89] Bhatia MR. Plate tectonics and geochemical composition of sandstones. J Geol. 1983;91(6):611–27.10.1086/628815Search in Google Scholar

[90] Maynard JB, Valloni R, Yu HS. Composition of modern deep-sea sands from arc-related basins. Geol Society, Lond Spec Publ. 1982;10(1):551–61.10.1144/GSL.SP.1982.010.01.36Search in Google Scholar

[91] Xiao LL, Liu FL. Precambrian metamorphic history of the metamorphic complexes in the Trans-North China Orogen. North China Craton Acta Pet Sin. 2015;31:3012–44.Search in Google Scholar

[92] Liu F, Zhang J, Liu C. Archean to paleoproterozoic evolution of the north china craton: Preface. Precambrian Res. 2017;303:1–9.10.1016/j.precamres.2017.11.011Search in Google Scholar

[93] Wan Y, Xu Z, Dong C, Nutman A, Ma M, Xie H. Episodic paleoproterozoic (2.45, 1.95 and 1.85 Ga) mafic magmatism and associated high temperature metamorphism in the Daqingshan area, north china craton: Shrimp zircon U–Pb dating and whole-rock geochemistry. Precambrian Res. 2013;224:71–93.10.1016/j.precamres.2012.09.014Search in Google Scholar

[94] Peng P, Bleeker W, Ernst RE, Söderlund U, McNicoll V. U–Pb baddeleyite ages, distribution and geochemistry of 925 Ma mafic dykes and 900 Ma sills in the North China craton: Evidence for a Neoproterozoic mantle plume. Lithos. 2011a;127:210–21.10.1016/j.lithos.2011.08.018Search in Google Scholar

[95] Peng P, Zhai MG, Li QL, Wu FY, Hou QL, Li Z, et al. Neoproterozoic (∼900 Ma) Sariwon sills in North Korea: geochronology, geochemistry and implications for the evolution of the south-eastern margin of the North China Craton. Gondwana Res. 2011b;20:243–54.10.1016/j.gr.2010.12.011Search in Google Scholar

[96] Zhang SH, Zhao Y, Ye H, Liu JM, Hu ZC. Origin and evolution of the Bainaimiao arc belt: Implications for crustal growth in the southern Central Asian orogenic belt. Geol Soc Am Bull. 2014;126:1275–300.10.1130/B31042.1Search in Google Scholar

[97] Zhang SH, Zhao Y, Song B, Hu JM, Liu SW, Yang YH, et al. Contrasting Late Carboniferous and Late Permian-Middle Triassic intrusive suites fromthe northern margin of the North China Craton: Geochronology, petrogenesis and tectonic implications. Geol Soc Am Bull. 2009;121:181–200.Search in Google Scholar

[98] Zhang SH, Zhao Y, Liu JM, Hu ZC. Different sources involved in generation of continental arc volcanism: The carboniferous-permian volcanic rocks in the northern margin of the north china block. Lithos. 2016;240–243:382–401.10.1016/j.lithos.2015.11.027Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-05-20
Revised: 2020-10-08
Accepted: 2020-10-13
Published Online: 2020-11-09

© 2020 Minjie Zhang et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. The simulation approach to the interpretation of archival aerial photographs
  3. The application of137Cs and210Pbexmethods in soil erosion research of Titel loess plateau, Vojvodina, Northern Serbia
  4. Provenance and tectonic significance of the Zhongwunongshan Group from the Zhongwunongshan Structural Belt in China: insights from zircon geochronology
  5. Analysis, Assessment and Early Warning of Mudflow Disasters along the Shigatse Section of the China–Nepal Highway
  6. Sedimentary succession and recognition marks of lacustrine gravel beach-bars, a case study from the Qinghai Lake, China
  7. Predicting small water courses’ physico-chemical status from watershed characteristics with two multivariate statistical methods
  8. An Overview of the Carbonatites from the Indian Subcontinent
  9. A new statistical approach to the geochemical systematics of Italian alkaline igneous rocks
  10. The significance of karst areas in European national parks and geoparks
  11. Geochronology, trace elements and Hf isotopic geochemistry of zircons from Swat orthogneisses, Northern Pakistan
  12. Regional-scale drought monitor using synthesized index based on remote sensing in northeast China
  13. Application of combined electrical resistivity tomography and seismic reflection method to explore hidden active faults in Pingwu, Sichuan, China
  14. Impact of interpolation techniques on the accuracy of large-scale digital elevation model
  15. Natural and human-induced factors controlling the phreatic groundwater geochemistry of the Longgang River basin, South China
  16. Land use/land cover assessment as related to soil and irrigation water salinity over an oasis in arid environment
  17. Effect of tillage, slope, and rainfall on soil surface microtopography quantified by geostatistical and fractal indices during sheet erosion
  18. Validation of the number of tie vectors in post-processing using the method of frequency in a centric cube
  19. An integrated petrophysical-based wedge modeling and thin bed AVO analysis for improved reservoir characterization of Zhujiang Formation, Huizhou sub-basin, China: A case study
  20. A grain size auto-classification of Baikouquan Formation, Mahu Depression, Junggar Basin, China
  21. Dynamics of mid-channel bars in the Middle Vistula River in response to ferry crossing abutment construction
  22. Estimation of permeability and saturation based on imaginary component of complex resistivity spectra: A laboratory study
  23. Distribution characteristics of typical geological relics in the Western Sichuan Plateau
  24. Inconsistency distribution patterns of different remote sensing land-cover data from the perspective of ecological zoning
  25. A new methodological approach (QEMSCAN®) in the mineralogical study of Polish loess: Guidelines for further research
  26. Displacement and deformation study of engineering structures with the use of modern laser technologies
  27. Virtual resolution enhancement: A new enhancement tool for seismic data
  28. Aeromagnetic mapping of fault architecture along Lagos–Ore axis, southwestern Nigeria
  29. Deformation and failure mechanism of full seam chamber with extra-large section and its control technology
  30. Plastic failure zone characteristics and stability control technology of roadway in the fault area under non-uniformly high geostress: A case study from Yuandian Coal Mine in Northern Anhui Province, China
  31. Comparison of swarm intelligence algorithms for optimized band selection of hyperspectral remote sensing image
  32. Soil carbon stock and nutrient characteristics of Senna siamea grove in the semi-deciduous forest zone of Ghana
  33. Carbonatites from the Southern Brazilian platform: I
  34. Seismicity, focal mechanism, and stress tensor analysis of the Simav region, western Turkey
  35. Application of simulated annealing algorithm for 3D coordinate transformation problem solution
  36. Application of the terrestrial laser scanner in the monitoring of earth structures
  37. The Cretaceous igneous rocks in southeastern Guangxi and their implication for tectonic environment in southwestern South China Block
  38. Pore-scale gas–water flow in rock: Visualization experiment and simulation
  39. Assessment of surface parameters of VDW foundation piles using geodetic measurement techniques
  40. Spatial distribution and risk assessment of toxic metals in agricultural soils from endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma region in South China
  41. An ABC-optimized fuzzy ELECTRE approach for assessing petroleum potential at the petroleum system level
  42. Microscopic mechanism of sandstone hydration in Yungang Grottoes, China
  43. Importance of traditional landscapes in Slovenia for conservation of endangered butterfly
  44. Landscape pattern and economic factors’ effect on prediction accuracy of cellular automata-Markov chain model on county scale
  45. The influence of river training on the location of erosion and accumulation zones (Kłodzko County, South West Poland)
  46. Multi-temporal survey of diaphragm wall with terrestrial laser scanning method
  47. Functionality and reliability of horizontal control net (Poland)
  48. Strata behavior and control strategy of backfilling collaborate with caving fully-mechanized mining
  49. The use of classical methods and neural networks in deformation studies of hydrotechnical objects
  50. Ice-crevasse sedimentation in the eastern part of the Głubczyce Plateau (S Poland) during the final stage of the Drenthian Glaciation
  51. Structure of end moraines and dynamics of the recession phase of the Warta Stadial ice sheet, Kłodawa Upland, Central Poland
  52. Mineralogy, mineral chemistry and thermobarometry of post-mineralization dykes of the Sungun Cu–Mo porphyry deposit (Northwest Iran)
  53. Main problems of the research on the Palaeolithic of Halych-Dnister region (Ukraine)
  54. Application of isometric transformation and robust estimation to compare the measurement results of steel pipe spools
  55. Hybrid machine learning hydrological model for flood forecast purpose
  56. Rainfall thresholds of shallow landslides in Wuyuan County of Jiangxi Province, China
  57. Dynamic simulation for the process of mining subsidence based on cellular automata model
  58. Developing large-scale international ecological networks based on least-cost path analysis – a case study of Altai mountains
  59. Seismic characteristics of polygonal fault systems in the Great South Basin, New Zealand
  60. New approach of clustering of late Pleni-Weichselian loess deposits (L1LL1) in Poland
  61. Implementation of virtual reference points in registering scanning images of tall structures
  62. Constraints of nonseismic geophysical data on the deep geological structure of the Benxi iron-ore district, Liaoning, China
  63. Mechanical analysis of basic roof fracture mechanism and feature in coal mining with partial gangue backfilling
  64. The violent ground motion before the Jiuzhaigou earthquake Ms7.0
  65. Landslide site delineation from geometric signatures derived with the Hilbert–Huang transform for cases in Southern Taiwan
  66. Hydrological process simulation in Manas River Basin using CMADS
  67. LA-ICP-MS U–Pb ages of detrital zircons from Middle Jurassic sedimentary rocks in southwestern Fujian: Sedimentary provenance and its geological significance
  68. Analysis of pore throat characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs
  69. Effects of igneous intrusions on source rock in the early diagenetic stage: A case study on Beipiao Formation in Jinyang Basin, Northeast China
  70. Applying floodplain geomorphology to flood management (The Lower Vistula River upstream from Plock, Poland)
  71. Effect of photogrammetric RPAS flight parameters on plani-altimetric accuracy of DTM
  72. Morphodynamic conditions of heavy metal concentration in deposits of the Vistula River valley near Kępa Gostecka (central Poland)
  73. Accuracy and functional assessment of an original low-cost fibre-based inclinometer designed for structural monitoring
  74. The impacts of diagenetic facies on reservoir quality in tight sandstones
  75. Application of electrical resistivity imaging to detection of hidden geological structures in a single roadway
  76. Comparison between electrical resistivity tomography and tunnel seismic prediction 303 methods for detecting the water zone ahead of the tunnel face: A case study
  77. The genesis model of carbonate cementation in the tight oil reservoir: A case of Chang 6 oil layers of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in the western Jiyuan area, Ordos Basin, China
  78. Disintegration characteristics in granite residual soil and their relationship with the collapsing gully in South China
  79. Analysis of surface deformation and driving forces in Lanzhou
  80. Geochemical characteristics of produced water from coalbed methane wells and its influence on productivity in Laochang Coalfield, China
  81. A combination of genetic inversion and seismic frequency attributes to delineate reservoir targets in offshore northern Orange Basin, South Africa
  82. Explore the application of high-resolution nighttime light remote sensing images in nighttime marine ship detection: A case study of LJ1-01 data
  83. DTM-based analysis of the spatial distribution of topolineaments
  84. Spatiotemporal variation and climatic response of water level of major lakes in China, Mongolia, and Russia
  85. The Cretaceous stratigraphy, Songliao Basin, Northeast China: Constrains from drillings and geophysics
  86. Canal of St. Bartholomew in Seča/Sezza: Social construction of the seascape
  87. A modelling resin material and its application in rock-failure study: Samples with two 3D internal fracture surfaces
  88. Utilization of marble piece wastes as base materials
  89. Slope stability evaluation using backpropagation neural networks and multivariate adaptive regression splines
  90. Rigidity of “Warsaw clay” from the Poznań Formation determined by in situ tests
  91. Numerical simulation for the effects of waves and grain size on deltaic processes and morphologies
  92. Impact of tourism activities on water pollution in the West Lake Basin (Hangzhou, China)
  93. Fracture characteristics from outcrops and its meaning to gas accumulation in the Jiyuan Basin, Henan Province, China
  94. Impact evaluation and driving type identification of human factors on rural human settlement environment: Taking Gansu Province, China as an example
  95. Identification of the spatial distributions, pollution levels, sources, and health risk of heavy metals in surface dusts from Korla, NW China
  96. Petrography and geochemistry of clastic sedimentary rocks as evidence for the provenance of the Jurassic stratum in the Daqingshan area
  97. Super-resolution reconstruction of a digital elevation model based on a deep residual network
  98. Seismic prediction of lithofacies heterogeneity in paleogene hetaoyuan shale play, Biyang depression, China
  99. Cultural landscape of the Gorica Hills in the nineteenth century: Franciscean land cadastre reports as the source for clarification of the classification of cultivable land types
  100. Analysis and prediction of LUCC change in Huang-Huai-Hai river basin
  101. Hydrochemical differences between river water and groundwater in Suzhou, Northern Anhui Province, China
  102. The relationship between heat flow and seismicity in global tectonically active zones
  103. Modeling of Landslide susceptibility in a part of Abay Basin, northwestern Ethiopia
  104. M-GAM method in function of tourism potential assessment: Case study of the Sokobanja basin in eastern Serbia
  105. Dehydration and stabilization of unconsolidated laminated lake sediments using gypsum for the preparation of thin sections
  106. Agriculture and land use in the North of Russia: Case study of Karelia and Yakutia
  107. Textural characteristics, mode of transportation and depositional environment of the Cretaceous sandstone in the Bredasdorp Basin, off the south coast of South Africa: Evidence from grain size analysis
  108. One-dimensional constrained inversion study of TEM and application in coal goafs’ detection
  109. The spatial distribution of retail outlets in Urumqi: The application of points of interest
  110. Aptian–Albian deposits of the Ait Ourir basin (High Atlas, Morocco): New additional data on their paleoenvironment, sedimentology, and palaeogeography
  111. Traditional agricultural landscapes in Uskopaljska valley (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
  112. A detection method for reservoir waterbodies vector data based on EGADS
  113. Modelling and mapping of the COVID-19 trajectory and pandemic paths at global scale: A geographer’s perspective
  114. Effect of organic maturity on shale gas genesis and pores development: A case study on marine shale in the upper Yangtze region, South China
  115. Gravel roundness quantitative analysis for sedimentary microfacies of fan delta deposition, Baikouquan Formation, Mahu Depression, Northwestern China
  116. Features of terraces and the incision rate along the lower reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River east of Namche Barwa: Constraints on tectonic uplift
  117. Application of laser scanning technology for structure gauge measurement
  118. Calibration of the depth invariant algorithm to monitor the tidal action of Rabigh City at the Red Sea Coast, Saudi Arabia
  119. Evolution of the Bystrzyca River valley during Middle Pleistocene Interglacial (Sudetic Foreland, south-western Poland)
  120. A 3D numerical analysis of the compaction effects on the behavior of panel-type MSE walls
  121. Landscape dynamics at borderlands: analysing land use changes from Southern Slovenia
  122. Effects of oil viscosity on waterflooding: A case study of high water-cut sandstone oilfield in Kazakhstan
  123. Special Issue: Alkaline-Carbonatitic magmatism
  124. Carbonatites from the southern Brazilian Platform: A review. II: Isotopic evidences
  125. Review Article
  126. Technology and innovation: Changing concept of rural tourism – A systematic review
Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/geo-2020-0146/html
Scroll to top button