Home Calibration of the depth invariant algorithm to monitor the tidal action of Rabigh City at the Red Sea Coast, Saudi Arabia
Article Open Access

Calibration of the depth invariant algorithm to monitor the tidal action of Rabigh City at the Red Sea Coast, Saudi Arabia

  • Mohammed H. Aljahdali and Mohamed Elhag EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 22, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Rabigh is a thriving coastal city located at the eastern bank of the Red Sea, Saudi Arabia. The city has suffered from shoreline destruction because of the invasive tidal action powered principally by the wind speed and direction over shallow waters. This study was carried out to calibrate the water column depth in the vicinity of Rabigh. Optical and microwave remote sensing data from the European Space Agency were collected over 2 years (2017–2018) along with the analog daily monitoring of tidal data collected from the marine station of Rabigh. Depth invariant index (DII) was implemented utilizing the optical data, while the Wind Field Estimation algorithm was implemented utilizing the microwave data. The findings of the current research emphasis on the oscillation behavior of the depth invariant mean values and the mean astronomical tides resulted in R2 of 0.75 and 0.79, respectively. Robust linear regression was established between the astronomical tide and the mean values of the normalized DII (R2 = 0.81). The findings also indicated that January had the strongest wind speed solidly correlated with the depth invariant values (R2 = 0.92). Therefore, decision-makers can depend on remote sensing data as an efficient tool to monitor natural phenomena and also to regulate human activities in fragile ecosystems.

1 Introduction

Satellite and airborne remote sensing have become a common tool in the analysis of different fields in earth and environmental sciences. This science has improved the capability of acquiring information about the Earth and its resources for global, regional, and local assessments [1,2]. Many remote sensing studies have used multispectral remotely sensed imagery to provide consequential data, which prove to be a valuable source of spatiotemporal data for several applications [3,4].

Optical remote sensing data were used extensively over the past four decades in various applications of Earth observation and natural resources management studies. The most implemented techniques are the Land Use Land Cover classification algorithms [5,6], the estimation and the realization of the vegetation indices [7,8,9,10], and the monitoring and the assessment of the natural hazardousness [11,12].

Conversely, microwave remote sensing data were recently incorporated with different natural phenomena where the weather condition limits the application of the optical data [13]. Most of the microwave remote sensing data were used in studies concerning oil spill detection [14,15], land subsidence and seismic activities [16,17], urban coherence, and anomaly detection [18,19]. Recently, there was a development of algorithms that concerns the water column depth [20,21,22] and finally the wind speed and the direction at the water surface [23,24,25].

Tides are caused by the physics of the solar system and by the relative movements of the Earth, Sun, and Moon. Tides are recorded as changes in the water level and are associated with water motions called tidal currents [26,27]. Although technically called tidal streams since causes of ocean currents include meteorological forcing and density variations, most mariners use the term “tidal current” for the astronomical component as well [28,29].

The estimation algorithm of the water depth column was initially practiced by Platt [30], and then, it was improved by Stumpf et al. [31] and Kerr and Purkis [32]. The algorithm takes into consideration the principles of the Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) through the water bodies. Therefore, the depth of the water column and/or the quality of the examined water plays a fundamental role in the algorithm resulting [33,34]. Consequently, clear shallow waters would be ideal to conduct reliable water depth estimations [34]. Although the water depth estimations are EMR wavelength-dependent since shorter wavelengths (e.g., the Blue and the Green band of Sentinel-2) are the optimal wavelengths to interact with water bodies [30,34].

Remote sensing applications on shallow waters mapping aids the understanding of the nearshore habitats including corals bleaching and water column corrections [21,34]. Spectral signatures collected from the seabed that was necessary to comprehend the water column depth throughout an empirical model of Lyzenga [35]. The model was continuously improved to become widely implemented known as depth invariant index (DII). DII is a transformation semi-empirical model that uses the water spectral signatures to contemplate the water column attenuation [36,37,38].

The ideal estimation of the water depth column would be at a steady water surface with no wind interactions [39,40]. In addition, this condition does not represent the reality where water bodies are continuously affected by wind action, especially at the surfaces [41,42]. Accordingly, the estimation of surface roughness becomes an essential parameter to realize and to validate throughout the estimation of the water depth column [34]. Hence, the surface and the seabed roughness’s are estimated consistently along with the swell structure, and the latter is correlated with the wind speed, wind direction, and the mud content [43,44].

The comprehensive objective of this study is to examine the effect of the tidal action on the water depth column near the shorelines of Rabigh. Correspondingly, the objective draws attention to tidal monitoring, water column calibration, and wind field estimation functions. Regression analysis was subsequently performed using the tide calendar data against the passive and active originated remote sensing data.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study area description

Rabigh is one of the Saudi coastal cities located on the Eastern side of the Red Sea at 22°44′03″N and 38°59′43″E (Figure 1). It is about ∼160 km north of Jeddah and parallelly surrounded in the north by one of the largest lagoons in the Red Sea. The lagoon, formerly known as Al-Kharrar, is located 10 km northwest of Rabigh [45]. Al-Kharrar lagoon lies under dry and warm tropical climate where at several seasons evaporation exceeds the rates of precipitation, except between May and November when large input of freshwater delivered via wadis is discharged to the southern part of the basin [45,46]. Geological investigations suggest that the lagoon was formed mainly by a major drop in the sea level, and consequently erosion occurred in the late Pleistocene [47,48,49]. The open normal water characterized by 25°C temperature and 39 PSU salinity inflows through the inlet as surface current, while the lagoon hypersaline water characterized by 30°C temperature and 40 PSU salinity outflows toward the open water [45]. The mean annual wind speed of the designated study area is 10.6 m/s directed North and Northeast; furthermore, the sediment load covers about 1,270 km2 annually for the city shoreline overdriven by flashfloods take place at the surrounding wadies [50].

Figure 1 The location of the study area shows Al Khara lagoon of Rabigh.
Figure 1

The location of the study area shows Al Khara lagoon of Rabigh.

2.2 Tidal monitoring

The time used in tidal data collection is the Coordinated Universal Time plus 3 h to match the actual local time. The calendar format for the Tide Calendar graphs begins with Sunday as the first day of the week. The Tidal data were collected from the Saudi Aramco station and referenced to Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT). LAT is calculated and is defined as the “lowest level that can occur under average meteorological conditions and any combination of astronomical conditions.” It should be realized that “abnormal” weather conditions (e.g., high barometric pressures and strong offshore winds) can lower values below LAT [51].

2.3 Remote sensing data

Two data sets of remote sensing data in the form of optical and microwave data were collected monthly from the European Space Agency (ESA) freely access catalog starting from January 2017 until December 2018. The optical data were conducted from Sentenial-2A instrumental, Multi-Spectral Instrument (MSI). While the Microwave data were collected from Sentinel-1B, Ground Range Detected (GRD) designed to register the C-band (5.546 cm wavelength) in 20 m spatial resolution.

2.4 Conceptual framework

2.4.1 Resampling

The MSI on-board Sentinel-2 composed of bands does not have the same spatial resolution. Visible bands and B8 (B2, B3, and B4) are registered in 10 m, and infrared (IR) and shortwave infrared (SWIR) bands (B5, B6, B7, B8a, B11, and B12) are registered in 20 m, while the cloud screen and aerosol bands (B1, B9, and B10) are registered in 60 m spatial resolution. The bands that are most sensitive to surface water reflection are B2 and B3, and radiated wavelengths off water bodies need to be calibrated using the radiated wavelengths of B8 and B9 [52], and because these bands are in different spatial resolution, data resampling preferably to B2 is a mandatory procedure in water column calibration [34,53].

2.4.2 Radiometric and atmospheric corrections

Temporal data analysis demonstrates radiometric distortion due to data acquisition atmospheric variabilities. Consequently, radiometric normalization to imagery is required, so the values corresponding to the same surface become comparable throughout temporal analyses [54,55]. The histogram normalization method is based on the use of pseudo-invariant features (PIFs) corresponding to optically bright targets (infrastructures) or optically dark targets (deep waters) to intercalibrate different images radiometrically [56,57].

The used data sets in the current research study are atmospherically corrected images (L2A-level), which means that the reflectance values of the bottom-of-atmosphere (BOA) from the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectances are corrected by eliminating the atmospheric interactions [58,59]. The implementation of the bathymetry algorithm for the Sentinel-2 product performs the atmospheric, terrain, and cirrus correction of the TOA input data. The algorithm creates BOA additional with the terrain and the cirrus-corrected reflectance images [60,61].

2.4.3 Deglint

The specular reflection of the sun radiations off water surfaces creates a frequent phenomenon known as “sun glint” in remote sensing images. Glint reflections do not penetrate the water surface and do not draw any spectral information about water subsurfaces [62]. Thus, the water-leaving reflectances are hard to monitor due to the nadir reflection of sun radiations on the air–water surfaces [63]. Therefore, the algorithm of glint removal (deglint) is performed to improve the seafloor mapping [37,64]. In principle, the algorithm performs linear regressions between NIR brightness represented by the x-axis and the band reflectance represented by the y-axis using the predefined ROI’s for deep water surfaces when it is expected to be ideally homogeneous (Figure 2). The gradient of the regression line is the quest of significance for given band i (bi). According to Hedley et al. [65,66], the algorithm was performed as follows:

(1)Ri=RibiRNIRMinNIR,

where NIR is the near infrared band of Sentinel 2.

Figure 2 ROI’s for deep, shallow water, and deglint.
Figure 2

ROI’s for deep, shallow water, and deglint.

2.4.4 Land/water mask

To avoid interference with land surface reflectance, an additional task is performed to mask the land/water surfaces. Masking of the bright objects (land surfaces) is mandatory since the water bodies do not allow the near infrared (NIR) wavelengths to penetrate [67]. Accordingly, water bodies appear dark in the satellite images following the deglint processor performance using the proper masking threshold [67,68].

2.4.5 Depth invariant indices

The fundamental concept of the depth invariant algorithm is based on the water bodies’ reflectance that is exponentially inverted with water bodies’ depth in approximation. According to Philpot [69] and Poursanidis et al. [70], the linearization of the deepwater reflectances shall be carried out as follows:

(2)Xi=lnRiRideep,

where Ri is Sentinel-2 band “i” reflectance and Rideep is Sentinel-2 band “i” deep reflectance.

Usually, bands 2 and 3 are most commonly used for the depth invariant algorithm, sand, vegetation, and mud slopes behavior plotted against those 2 bands that are the same although the intercepts of these objects to the plotting axes are different [38,71]. This empirical function can be performed as follows:

(3)Xi=KiKjXj+dij,

where dij is the intercept constant of the questioned DII. Ki/Kj is the water reflectance attenuation coefficient.

Therefore, it is necessary to identify two different depths of the water bodies within the satellite footage to represent the shallow and the deepwater surfaces (Figure 3). A total of 10 depth samples were collected from the Lagoon to represent the shallow waters, and another 10 depth samples were collected from the open sea to represent deep waters (Table 1). The differentiation between shallow and depth waters was based on the naked eye reef visibility [72]. Consequently, the attenuation reflectances of variant water surfaces are estimated according to the perpendicular offset’s method of Sordillo et al. [67] as follows:

(4)Ki/Kj=a+a2+1,

where

(5)a=σiiσjj2σij.

Then,

(6)σij=XiXj¯Xi¯Xj¯.

Decisively, the DII is estimated according to Poursanidis et al. [70] as follows:

(7)dij=XiKiKjXj.

Wind speed and wind direction affect systematically the wave intensity especially in shallow waters where the wind speed and the current speed are relatively the same. Furthermore, tidal action affects proportionally the onshore water column [22,30]. Microwave data fashioned in the C-band obtained from Sentinel-1 significantly enhanced the wind estimation remotely. The algorithm developed by Lehner et al. [73] and Yijun He et al. [74] detects the water surface roughness in terms of speed and direction using the Geophysical Model Function (GMF) of CMOD-5. The GMF was initially developed by Stoffelen and Anderson [75] and written as follows:

(8)Zmυ,ϕ,θ=B0pυ,θ1+B1υ,θcosϕ+B2υ,θcos2ϕ.

where

  • φ=χα,

    Then,

  • z=σ0p,

where α is the azimuth angle, χ is the wind direction, ν is the wind speed, θ is the incident angle, B0 is the wind speed and incidence angle coefficient, B1 is the upwind/downwind effects, B2 is the unwind/crosswind effects, and P is the transformed coefficient (p = 0.625).

Figure 3 Depth invariant concept.
Figure 3

Depth invariant concept.

Table 1

Location and the depth (m) of the water depth samples

Pin idPin X coordinate (north) Pin Y coordinate (east)Depth (m)
122°59′12.45″N38°49′57.96″E0.33Lagoon samples
222°58′38.50″N38°51′22.82″E0.28
322°57′50.10″N38°50′51.49″E0.56
422°56′23.51″N38°52′23.72″E0.47
522°56′19.30″N38°54′13.40″E0.84
622°54′45.90″N38°53′47.59″E0.68
722°54′6.85″N38°55′56.58″E0.59
822°51′53.59″N38°55′44.57″E0.63
922°51′19.63″N38°56′9.44″E0.58
1022°51′52.69″N38°57′41.59″E0.69
1122°58′44.87″N38°47′49.62″E5.30Open water samples
1222°57′11.84″N38°49′49.80″E8.12
1322°55′34.24″N38°50′51.59″E9.54
1422°54′2.60″N38°51′52.44″E7.98
1522°52′32.63″N38°52′47.73″E11.57
1622°51′17.08″N38°53′38.42″E12.41
1722°50′38.97″N38°54′8.12″E6.52
1822°49′25.12″N38°55′18.12″E8.34
1922°53′38.99″N38°51′37.95″E10.84
2022°51′7.83″N38°53′26.67″E12.00

The CMOD-5 model is designed for the Normalized Radar Cross Section (NRCS). The model converts the NRCS-HH into NRCS-VV polarization according to Lehner et al. [73] and written as follows:

(9)συ0=1+2tan2θ21+αtan2θ2σH0

where α is set to 1 and H is the horizontal polarization.

The microwave data were preprocessed to ensure the precise orbit file identification, the Thermal Noise Removal-processor according to Park et al. [76] and finally the GRD Border Noise Removal according to Ali et al. [77]. The overall framework is demonstrated in Figure 4.

Figure 4 Depth invariant conceptual framework.
Figure 4

Depth invariant conceptual framework.

3 Results and discussion

The integration of the remote sensing data analysis was conducted to understand the relationship between the shallow water surfaces and the EMR. Regression analysis was practiced evaluating the regression coefficient under different data settings (maximum, minimum, and mean values).

Normalized DII mean values (>4) were found within November 2017 and April and July 2018, whereas lower values were distributed within March to September and late October 2017 and February 2018 (Figure 5). Overall, a goodness-of-fit R2 shows a positive correlation between the mean DII and the designated timeframe. Moreover, DII values showed a typical oscillation between November 2017 and February 2018 covering four astronomical seasons (Spring, Autumn, Winter, and Summer) in which the index ranges between 1 and 5 (Figure 6).

Figure 5 Distribution of the mean values of the DII.
Figure 5

Distribution of the mean values of the DII.

Figure 6 Distribution of the mean values of the astronomical tide (cm).
Figure 6

Distribution of the mean values of the astronomical tide (cm).

The mean astronomical tide (in cm) values show unequivocal oscillation between November 2017 and February 2018 in which they ranged between 20 and ∼50 cm (Figure 7). The highest (rise) mean astronomical tide values were found in November 2017 and October 2018, mainly characterized by the tidal rise of about 46 and 48 cm, respectively. The lowest (retreat) mean values, however, were found within September and December 2017 and up to April 2018. The relationship between mean astronomical tide (cm) and our timeframe is quite positive with a coefficient of determination, i.e., R2 = 0.79.

Figure 7 Distribution of the maximum values of the DII.
Figure 7

Distribution of the maximum values of the DII.

The maximum DII values versus the designated studied astronomical timeframe show a slight fluctuation between November 2017 and February 2018 in which the maximum DII values are within the range between 6 and 11 (Figure 8). The fluctuation pattern of the maximum DII matches the mean DII data that are characterized by a trough (higher values) between September and December 2017, and April 2018. The lowest values in the maximum DII are also incomparable with the mean DII (see Figure 6) and the R2 = 0.6, suggesting a slight positive correlation between the maximum DII and timeframe.

Figure 8 Distribution of the maximum values of the astronomical tide (cm).
Figure 8

Distribution of the maximum values of the astronomical tide (cm).

The maximum values of the astronomical tide (cm) show a clear oscillation resembling the mean astronomical tide in Figure 7, in which the maximum values range between 30 and 70 cm (Figure 9). The highest maximum values are concentrated around November 2017 and June 2018, and October 2017 and February 2018, while the lowest values are found to characterize the months of September 2017 and July 2018 (Figure 9). The coefficient of determination R2 was calculated to be 0.752 between the maximum astronomical tide (cm) and months, which suggests a reasonably positive correlation.

Figure 9 Distribution of the minimum values of the DII.
Figure 9

Distribution of the minimum values of the DII.

The minimum DII values show a clear oscillation/fluctuation between November 2017 and February 2018 with values ranging between 0.9 and 1.5 (Figure 10). The channel that represents the highest values of the minimum DII is found between December 2017 and April and July 2018. As similar to the DII mean and maximum data (Figures 6 and 8), the coefficient of determination R2 is 0.75, suggesting a positive correlation reminiscent of the mean and max DII correlation with the timeframe.

Figure 10 Distribution of the minimum values of the astronomical tide (cm).
Figure 10

Distribution of the minimum values of the astronomical tide (cm).

The minimum astronomical tide values show a similar fluctuation pattern reminiscent of the mean and maximum astronomical tide between November 2017 and February 2018 (Figure 10). The values range between 8 and 40 cm, and the months between November 2017 and June and July 2018 and February 2019 represent a high rise in tide. The high tidal values range between >20 and >40 cm, whereas the lowest tide retreat values are found to clump within 8–10 cm. Parallel to the mean and max astronomical tide (cm) illustrated in Figures 6 and 8, the correlation coefficient R2 is 0.60, which suggests a weak correlation.

The correlation coefficient of the normalized mean, max, and min tidal values versus remotely sensed depth shows a strong positive correlation (Figures 11–13). All estimated and actual values suggest a strong positive correlation with depth.

Figure 11 The correlation coefficient of the normalized minimum values (estimated/actual).
Figure 11

The correlation coefficient of the normalized minimum values (estimated/actual).

Figure 12 The correlation coefficient of the normalized maximum values (estimated/actual).
Figure 12

The correlation coefficient of the normalized maximum values (estimated/actual).

Figure 13 The correlation coefficient of the normalized mean values (estimated/actual).
Figure 13

The correlation coefficient of the normalized mean values (estimated/actual).

The DII values of January (2017/2018) range between 0 and 6, while the wind speed values (m/s) range between 0.1 and 9.4 m/s (Figure 14) with an average wind speed of 3.8 m/s during January. The highest value of the DII (6.6) corresponds to a wind speed of about 9.4 m/s. In general, there is a clear trend of increasing DII values with the increase of wind speed, in which R2 = 0.92 suggests a positive correlation.

Figure 14 The DII versus wind speed (m/s) in January.
Figure 14

The DII versus wind speed (m/s) in January.

The DII values of April (2017/2018) range between 0 and 7, while the wind speed values (m/s) range between 0.1 and 5.4 m/s (Figure 15) with an average wind speed of 2.2 m/s during April. The highest value of the DII (7.3) corresponds to a wind speed of about 3.5 m/s. There is no clear trend of such a positive correlation between the DII and the wind speed during April, similar to January. The correlation coefficient R2 is 0.62.

Figure 15 The DII versus wind speed (m/s) in April.
Figure 15

The DII versus wind speed (m/s) in April.

The DII values of July range between 0 and 6, while the wind speed values (m/s) range between 0.1 and 6.7 m/s (Figure 16) with an average of 2.9 m/s during July. The highest value of the DII (6.2) corresponds to a wind speed of about 1 m/s. Similar to the April month, there is no clear trend of such a positive correlation between the DII and the wind speed during July in which the correlation coefficient R2 is 0.28.

Figure 16 The DII versus wind speed (m/s) in April.
Figure 16

The DII versus wind speed (m/s) in April.

The DII values during October range between 0 and 1.3, while the wind speed values (m/s) range between 0.1 and 3 m/s with an average of 2.0 m/s. The highest value of the DII (1.3) corresponds to a wind speed of about 3 m/s. Similar to April and July, there is no clear trend of such a positive correlation between the DII and the wind speed during October in which the correlation coefficient R2 is 0.33 (Figure 17).

Figure 17 The DII versus wind speed (m/s) in October.
Figure 17

The DII versus wind speed (m/s) in October.

The Bathymetry algorithm was developed and validated by ESA to monitor the majority of the world’s shallow water variations with the increased temporal and spatial resolution, and the validation process was conducted by several scholarly works of Spitzer and Dirks [20] and Poursanidis et al. [70]. Shallow water monitoring is very important because it appears to be the first respondent to global climate changes, such as increased sea surface temperature, ultraviolet radiation, and acidification of seawater that results from higher levels of atmospheric CO2 concentration [78,79,80].

Changes in winds and barometric pressures also cause variations in the tide level. In general, with low barometric pressure, the heights of both high and low water surfaces will be higher than predicted, while with high pressure, they will be lower than predicted [81]. There are also seasonal variations due to lower summer and higher winter atmospheric pressure. During summer, there is a regional “thermal low” pressure system over the Arabian Peninsula. These variations in pressure systems have been included in the predictions. Sea level change due to meteorological conditions is roughly a 1 cm rise or fall for every 1 millibar change in pressure [82,83].

According to Pugh [84], there are four classifications of tidal patterns or tide types based on the tide curve frequency and successive range variations: diurnal, semi-diurnal, mixed (mostly diurnal), and mixed (mostly semi-diurnal). For example, semi-diurnal tides have two high and two low tides each day. The tidal day cycle requires 24 h and 50 min, since the moon, which exerts the greatest tidal influence, advances 50 min each day in its orbit around the Earth [85].

Tides occur twice daily, and the amplitude of the associated sea-level change differs from region to region. The rise and fall of the sea level associated with the fluctuations of tides produce tidal currents. Tidal currents, consequently, play a significant role in the coastline morphology and benthic depositional environments [86]. Tidal currents and waves are interlinked when it comes to coastlines accretion and erosions [86,87] although our information about the progress of the action of both tidal currents and waves on shoreline remains unexplored. During spring tide, wide tropical areas are submerged, while during neap tide tropical mudflats are exposed [86,88].

The overall range of the tide also changes daily. This effect is mainly caused by the changing alignment of the Earth, Sun, and Moon [89]. The minimum range tides (also called neap tides) occur at the quarter phases of the moon, while the maximum range tides (spring tides) occur during the full and new moon phases. Due to inertial effects, spring and neap tides can lag a couple of days behind the corresponding phases of the moon [90,91]. There is also a marked seasonal change in the tidal range. Maximum ranges, with the highest high tides and lowest low tides, generally occur near the summer and winter solstices (in June and December) when the sun is furthest from the Earth. However, local factors may cause considerable lag depending on the station location [92,93].

The force of “wind stress” and tidal actions are the major controller in the hydrographical features and general water circulation of the lagoon [46,50]. Tidal action is the major factor in shoreline erosion that led coastal cities to stronger exposure to tides [94,95]. The city has suffered from shoreline destruction because of the invasive tidal action powered principally by the wind speed and the direction over shallow waters [87,96]. The mean bathymetrical water depth of Al-Kharrar lagoon is 5 ± 2.8 m [45]. The interaction between the open water and the shallow water of Al-Kharrar lagoon occurs via a slightly wide and deeper inlet of 120 m width and 18 m water depth [45].

4 Conclusions and recommendations

Both the DII and astronomical tide reveal oscillation over four seasons and are positively correlated with the timeframe of the current study. The comparison between the DII and the astronomical tide is crossing each other between September 2017 and July 2018 when the DII is higher than the astronomical tide (cm). The DII against the wind speed (m/s) in the four seasons shows a positive correlation in January, but a weak correlation in April, July, and October. Higher wind speed (m/s) corresponds to higher values of the DII in January, while there is no clear pattern in April, July, and October. The images showed valid values over shallow areas where the solar radiation can penetrate the seafloor and is reflected from the features of interest, while over deep areas only noise values can be seen. Collectively, this processor is very useful in coral reef detection and inspection, which showed very competent use of remote sensing. It also explores the ways to work for water resources by using band variations techniques.

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah (Grant No. G-90-155-1441). The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks DSR technical and financial support.

References

[1] Tuia D, Volpi M, Copa L, Kanevski M, Munoz-Mari J. A survey of active learning algorithms for supervised remote sensing image classification. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Proc. 2011;5(3):606–17.10.1109/JSTSP.2011.2139193Search in Google Scholar

[2] Kennedy RE, Townsend PA, Gross JE, Cohen WB, Bolstad P, Wang YQ, et al. Remote sensing change detection tools for natural resource managers: understanding concepts and tradeoffs in the design of landscape monitoring projects. Remote Sens Environ. 2009;113(7):1382–96.10.1016/j.rse.2008.07.018Search in Google Scholar

[3] Al Mamun A. Identification and monitoring the change of land use pattern using remote sensing and GIS: a case study of Dhaka city. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng. 2013;6(2):20–8.10.9790/1684-0622028Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bahrawi J, Elhag M. Consideration of seasonal variations of water radiometric indices for the estimation of soil moisture content in arid environment in saudi arabia. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2019;17(1):285–303.10.15666/aeer/1701_285303Search in Google Scholar

[5] Erbek FS, Özkan C, Taberner M. Comparison of maximum likelihood classification method with supervised artificial neural network algorithms for land use activities. Int J Remote Sens. 2004;25(9):1733–48.10.1080/0143116031000150077Search in Google Scholar

[6] Elhag M. Detection of temporal changes of eastern coast of Saudi Arabia for better natural resources management. Indian J Geo-Mar Sci. 2016;45(1):29–37.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Crippen RE. Calculating the vegetation index faster. Remote Sens Environ. 1990;34(1):71–3.10.1016/0034-4257(90)90085-ZSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Myneni RB, Hall FG, Sellers PJ, Marshak AL. The interpretation of spectral vegetation indexes. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 1995;33(2):481–6.10.1109/TGRS.1995.8746029Search in Google Scholar

[9] Elmore AJ, Mustard JF, Manning SJ, Lobell DB. Quantifying vegetation change in semiarid environments: precision and accuracy of spectral mixture analysis and the normalized difference vegetation index. Remote Sens Environ. 2000;73(1):87–102.10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00100-0Search in Google Scholar

[10] Elhag M. Remotely sensed vegetation indices and spatial decision support system for better water consumption Regime in Nile Delta. A case study for rice cultivation suitability map. Life Sci J. 2014;11(1):201–9.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Joyce KE, Belliss SE, Samsonov SV, McNeill SJ, Glassey PJ. A review of the status of satellite remote sensing and image processing techniques for mapping natural hazards and disasters. Prog Phys Geogr. 2009;33(2):183–207.10.1177/0309133309339563Search in Google Scholar

[12] Poursanidis D, Chrysoulakis N. Remote Sensing, natural hazards and the contribution of ESA sentinels missions. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ. 2017;6:25–38.10.1016/j.rsase.2017.02.001Search in Google Scholar

[13] Wang Z, Xia J, Wang L, Mao Z, Zeng Q, Tian L, et al. Atmospheric correction methods for GF-1 WFV1 data in hazy weather. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 2018;46(3):355–66.10.1007/s12524-017-0679-5Search in Google Scholar

[14] Shirvany R, Chabert M, Tourneret JY. Ship and oil-spill detection using the degree of polarization in linear and hybrid/compact dual-pol SAR. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens. 2012;5(3):885–92.10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2182760Search in Google Scholar

[15] Grover A, Kumar S, Kumar A. Ship detection using Sentinel-1 SAR data. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 2018;4:5–324.10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-5-317-2018Search in Google Scholar

[16] Lanari R, Fornaro G, Riccio D, Migliaccio M, Papathanassiou KP, Moreira JR, et al. Generation of digital elevation models by using SIR-C/X-SAR multifrequency two-pass interferometry: The Etna case study. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 1996;34(5):1097–114.10.1109/36.536526Search in Google Scholar

[17] Yang B, Xu H, Liu W, You Y, Xie X. Realistic lower bound on elevation estimation for tomographic SAR. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens. 2018;11(7):2429–39.10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2834950Search in Google Scholar

[18] Shinozuka M, Ghanem R, Houshmand B, Mansouri B. Damage detection in urban areas by SAR imagery. J Eng Mech. 2000;126(7):769–77.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:7(769)Search in Google Scholar

[19] Washaya P, Balz T. SAR coherence change detection of urban areas affected by disasters using sentinel-1 imagery. ISPRS Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 2018;XLII-3:1857–61.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-1857-2018Search in Google Scholar

[20] Spitzer D, Dirks RJ. Shallow water bathymetry and bottom classification by means of the Landsat and SPOT optical scanners. Earth remote sensing using the landsat thermatic mapper and SPOT sensor systems. Innsbruck, Austria: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 1986.10.1117/12.938578Search in Google Scholar

[21] de O Falcão A. Control of an oscillating-water-column wave power plant for maximum energy production. Appl Ocean Res. 2002;24(2):73–82.10.1016/S0141-1187(02)00021-4Search in Google Scholar

[22] McKinna LIW, Fearns PRC, Weeks SJ, Werdell PJ, Reichstetter M, Franz BA, et al. A semianalytical ocean color inversion algorithm with explicit water column depth and substrate reflectance parameterization. J Geophys Res Ocean. 2015;120(3):1741–70.10.1002/2014JC010224Search in Google Scholar

[23] Gerling T. Structure of the surface wind field from the Seasat SAR. J Geophys Res Ocean. 1986;91(C2):2308–20.10.1029/JC091iC02p02308Search in Google Scholar

[24] Yang X, Li X, Zheng Q, Gu X, Pichel WG, Li Z. Comparison of ocean-surface winds retrieved from QuikSCAT scatterometer and Radarsat-1 SAR in offshore waters of the US west coast. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2010;8(1):163–7.10.1109/LGRS.2010.2053345Search in Google Scholar

[25] Ballard S, Graber H, Caruso M. Coastal surface wind measurements derived from SAR. 2017 IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium (IGARSS). Fort Worth, TX, USA: IEEE; 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Chelton DB, Enfield DB. Ocean signals in tide gauge records. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 1986;91(B9):9081–98.10.1029/JB091iB09p09081Search in Google Scholar

[27] Idier D, Bertin X, Thompson P, Pickering MD. Interactions between mean sea level, tide, surge, waves and flooding: mechanisms and contributions to sea level variations at the coast. Surv Geophys. 2019;40(6):1603–30.10.1007/s10712-019-09549-5Search in Google Scholar

[28] Münchow A, Melling H. Ocean current observations from Nares Strait to the west of Greenland: interannual to tidal variability and forcing. J Mar Res. 2008;66(6):801–33.10.1357/002224008788064612Search in Google Scholar

[29] Goward Brown AJ, Lewis M, Barton BI, Jeans G, Spall SA. Investigation of the modulation of the tidal stream resource by ocean currents through a complex tidal channel. J Mar Sci Eng. 2019;7(10):341.10.3390/jmse7100341Search in Google Scholar

[30] Platt T. Primary production of the ocean water column as a function of surface light intensity: algorithms for remote sensing. Deep Sea Res Part A Oceanogr Res Pap. 1986;33(2):149–63.10.1016/0198-0149(86)90115-9Search in Google Scholar

[31] Stumpf RP, Holderied K, Sinclair M. Determination of water depth with high-resolution satellite imagery over variable bottom types. Limnol Oceanogr. 2003;48(1part2):547–56.10.4319/lo.2003.48.1_part_2.0547Search in Google Scholar

[32] Kerr JM, Purkis S. An algorithm for optically-deriving water depth from multispectral imagery in coral reef landscapes in the absence of ground-truth data. Remote Sens Environ. 2018;210:307–24.10.1016/j.rse.2018.03.024Search in Google Scholar

[33] Li J, Ma R, Xue K, Zhang Y, Loiselle S. A remote sensing algorithm of column-integrated algal biomass covering algal bloom conditions in a shallow Eutrophic Lake. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 2018;7(12):466.10.3390/ijgi7120466Search in Google Scholar

[34] Chen B, Yang Y, Xu D, Huang E. A dual band algorithm for shallow water depth retrieval from high spatial resolution imagery with no ground truth. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2019;151:1–13.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.02.012Search in Google Scholar

[35] Lyzenga DR. Passive remote sensing techniques for mapping water depth and bottom features. Appl Opt. 1978;17(3):379–83.10.1364/AO.17.000379Search in Google Scholar

[36] Siregar V, Agus SB, Subarno T, Prabowo NW. Mapping shallow waters habitats using OBIA by applying several approaches of depth invariant index in North Kepulauan Seribu. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2018;149:012052.10.1088/1755-1315/149/1/012052Search in Google Scholar

[37] Eugenio F, Marcello J, Martin J. High-resolution maps of bathymetry and benthic habitats in shallow-water environments using multispectral remote sensing imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2015;53(7):3539–49.10.1109/TGRS.2014.2377300Search in Google Scholar

[38] Hedley JD, Roelfsema C, Brando V, Giardino C, Kutser T, Phinn S, et al. Coral reef applications of Sentinel-2: coverage, characteristics, bathymetry and benthic mapping with comparison to Landsat 8. Remote Sens Environ. 2018;216:598–614.10.1016/j.rse.2018.07.014Search in Google Scholar

[39] Anis A, Moum J. Surface wave–turbulence interactions. Scaling ε(z) near the sea surface. J Phys Oceanogr. 1995;25(9):2025–45.10.1175/1520-0485(1995)025<2025:SWISNT>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[40] Lee JA, Hacker JP, Delle Monache L, Kosović B, Clifton A, Vandenberghe F, et al. Improving wind predictions in the marine atmospheric boundary layer through parameter estimation in a single-column model. Mon Weather Rev. 2017;145(1):5–24.10.1175/MWR-D-16-0063.1Search in Google Scholar

[41] Laxague NJM, Haus BK, Ortiz-Suslow DG, Smith CJ, Novelli G, Dai H, et al. Passive optical sensing of the near-surface wind-driven current profile. J Atmos Ocean Technol. 2017;34(5):1097–111.10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0090.1Search in Google Scholar

[42] Almazroui M, Ammar K, Islam MN, Awad AM, Khalid MS. Spring Saharan cyclones over Saudi Arabia: preliminary study of the impacts on climate. Earth Syst Environ. 2019;3(2):153–71.10.1007/s41748-019-00098-wSearch in Google Scholar

[43] Loizeau J-L, Dominik J, Luzzi T, Vernet JP. Sediment core correlation and mapping of sediment accumulation rates in Lake Geneva (Switzerland, France) using volume magnetic susceptibility. J Great Lakes Res. 1997;23(4):391–402.10.1016/S0380-1330(97)70921-3Search in Google Scholar

[44] Gaber A, Soliman F, Koch M, El-Baz F. Using full-polarimetric SAR data to characterize the surface sediments in desert areas: a case study in El-Gallaba Plain, Egypt. Remote Sens Environ. 2015;162:11–28.10.1016/j.rse.2015.01.024Search in Google Scholar

[45] Al-Dubai TA, Abu-Zied RH, Basaham AS. Present environmental status of Al-Kharrar Lagoon, central of the eastern Red Sea coast, Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci. 2017;10(14):305.10.1007/s12517-017-3083-0Search in Google Scholar

[46] Al-Barakat A. Some hydrographic features of Rabigh lagoon along the eastern coast of the Red Sea. Mar Sci. 2010;21:1–132.10.4197/Mar.21-1.7Search in Google Scholar

[47] Al-Washmi H. Sedimentological aspects and environmental conditions recognized from the bottom sediments of Al-Kharrar Lagoon, eastern Red Sea coastal plain, Saudi Arabia. J KAU Mar Sci. 1999;10:71–87.10.4197/mar.10-1.5Search in Google Scholar

[48] Zhao B, Wang Z, Chen J, Chen Z. Marine sediment records and relative sea level change during late Pleistocene in the Changjiang delta area and adjacent continental shelf. Quaternary Int. 2008;186(1):164–72.10.1016/j.quaint.2007.08.006Search in Google Scholar

[49] Bahrawi JA, Elhag M. Simulation of Sea level rise and its impacts on the western coastal area of Saudi Arabia. Indian J Geo-Mar Sci. 2016;45(1):54–61.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Elhag M, Bahrawi JA. Sedimentation mapping in shallow shoreline of arid environments using active remote sensing data. Nat Hazards. 2019;99(2):879–94.10.1007/s11069-019-03780-4Search in Google Scholar

[51] Mori N, Shimura T, Yasuda T, Mase H. Multi-model climate projections of ocean surface variables under different climate scenarios – future change of waves, sea level and wind. Ocean Eng. 2013;71:122–9.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.02.016Search in Google Scholar

[52] Sibanda M, Mutanga O, Rouget M. Examining the potential of Sentinel-2 MSI spectral resolution in quantifying above ground biomass across different fertilizer treatments. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2015;110:55–65.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.10.005Search in Google Scholar

[53] Pahlevan N, Sarkar S, Franz BA, Balasubramanian SV, He J. Sentinel-2 multispectral instrument (MSI) data processing for aquatic science applications: Demonstrations and validations. Remote Sens Environ. 2017;201:47–56.10.1016/j.rse.2017.08.033Search in Google Scholar

[54] Du Y, Teillet PM, Cihlar J. Radiometric normalization of multitemporal high-resolution satellite images with quality control for land cover change detection. Remote Sens Environ. 2002;82(1):123–34.10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00029-9Search in Google Scholar

[55] Zhang Y, Yu L, Sun M, Zhu X. A mixed radiometric normalization method for mosaicking of high-resolution satellite imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2017;55(5):2972–84.10.1109/TGRS.2017.2657582Search in Google Scholar

[56] Schott JR, Salvaggio C, Volchok WJ. Radiometric scene normalization using pseudoinvariant features. Remote Sens Environ. 1988;26(1):1–16.10.1016/0034-4257(88)90116-2Search in Google Scholar

[57] Sadeghi V, Ahmadi FF, Ebadi H. A new automatic regression-based approach for relative radiometric normalization of multitemporal satellite imagery. Comput Appl Math. 2017;36(2):825–42.10.1007/s40314-015-0254-zSearch in Google Scholar

[58] Jia L, Su Z, van den Hurk B, Menenti M, Moene A, De Bruin HAR, et al. Estimation of sensible heat flux using the surface energy balance system (SEBS) and ATSR measurements. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C. 2003;28(1–3):75–88.10.1016/S1474-7065(03)00009-3Search in Google Scholar

[59] Cho K, Kim Y. Simulation of Sentinel-2 product using airborne hyperspectral image and analysis of TOA and BOA reflectance for evaluation of Sen2cor atmosphere correction: Focused on agricultural land. Korean J Remote Sens. 2019;35(2):251–63.Search in Google Scholar

[60] Louis J, Debaecker V, Pflug B, Main-Knorn M, Bieniarz J, Mueller-Wilm U, et al. Sentinel-2 sen2cor: L2a processor for users. Proceedings of the living planet symposium, Prague. Prague: Czech Republic; 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[61] Main-Knorn M, Pflug B, Louis J, Debaecker V. Sen2Cor for sentinel-2. Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XXIII. Warsaw, Poland: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2017.10.1117/12.2278218Search in Google Scholar

[62] Su H, Liu H, Heyman WD. Automated derivation of bathymetric information from multi-spectral satellite imagery using a non-linear inversion model. Mar Geodesy. 2008;31(4):281–98.10.1080/01490410802466652Search in Google Scholar

[63] Toole DA, Siegel DA, Menzies DW, Neumann MJ, Smith RC. Remote-sensing reflectance determinations in the coastal ocean environment: impact of instrumental characteristics and environmental variability. Appl Opt. 2000;39(3):456–69.10.1364/AO.39.000456Search in Google Scholar

[64] Hochberg EJ, Andrefouet S, Tyler MR. Sea surface correction of high spatial resolution Ikonos images to improve bottom mapping in near-shore environments. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2003;41(7):1724–9.10.1109/TGRS.2003.815408Search in Google Scholar

[65] Hedley JD, Harborne AR, Mumby PJ. Simple and robust removal of sun glint for mapping shallow-water benthos. Int J Remote Sens. 2005;26(10):2107–12.10.1080/01431160500034086Search in Google Scholar

[66] Hedley J, Roelfsema C, Koetz B, Phinn S. Capability of the Sentinel 2 mission for tropical coral reef mapping and coral bleaching detection. Remote Sens Environ. 2012;120:145–55.10.1016/j.rse.2011.06.028Search in Google Scholar

[67] Sordillo LA, Pu Y, Pratavieira S, Budansky Y, Alfano RR. Deep optical imaging of tissue using the second and third near-infrared spectral windows. J Biomed Opt. 2014;19(5):056004.10.1117/1.JBO.19.5.056004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[68] Wicaksono P. Improving the accuracy of multispectral-based benthic habitats mapping using image rotations: The application of principle component analysis and independent component analysis. Eur J Remote Sens. 2016;49(1):433–63.10.5721/EuJRS20164924Search in Google Scholar

[69] Philpot WD. Bathymetric mapping with passive multispectral imagery. Appl Opt. 1989;28(8):1569–78.10.1364/AO.28.001569Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[70] Poursanidis D, Traganos D, Reinartz P, Chrysoulakis N. On the use of Sentinel-2 for coastal habitat mapping and satellite-derived bathymetry estimation using downscaled coastal aerosol band. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2019;80:58–70.10.1016/j.jag.2019.03.012Search in Google Scholar

[71] Nurlidiasari M, Budiman S. Mapping coral reef habitat with and without water column correction using Quickbird image. Int J Remote Sens Earth Sci. 2010;2:2.10.30536/j.ijreses.2005.v2.a1357Search in Google Scholar

[72] Kim S-H, Yang CS, Ouchi K. Validation of the semi-analytical algorithm for estimating vertical underwater visibility using MODIS data in the waters around Korea. Korean J Remote Sens. 2013;29(6):601–10.10.7780/kjrs.2013.29.6.3Search in Google Scholar

[73] Lehner S, Schulz-Stellenfleth J, Schattler B, Breit H, Horstmann J. Wind and wave measurements using complex ERS-2 SAR wave mode data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2000;38(5):2246–57.10.1109/36.868882Search in Google Scholar

[74] Yijun He H, Perrie W, Qingping Zou, Vachon PW. A new wind vector algorithm for C-band SAR. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2005;43(7):1453–8.10.1109/TGRS.2005.848411Search in Google Scholar

[75] Stoffelen A, Anderson D. Scatterometer data interpretation: estimation and validation of the transfer function CMOD4. J Geophys Res Ocean. 1997;102(C3):5767–80.10.1029/96JC02860Search in Google Scholar

[76] Park J-W, Korosov A, Babiker M, Sandven S. Efficient thermal noise removal of Sentinel-1 image and its impacts on sea ice applications. Vienna, Austria: EGU general assembly conference abstracts; 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[77] Ali I, Cao S, Naeimi V, Paulik C, Wagner W. Methods to remove the border noise from Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar data: implications and importance for time-series analysis. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens. 2018;11(3):777–86.10.1109/JSTARS.2017.2787650Search in Google Scholar

[78] Löptien U, Meier HM. The influence of increasing water turbidity on the sea surface temperature in the Baltic Sea: a model sensitivity study. J Mar Syst. 2011;88(2):323–31.10.1016/j.jmarsys.2011.06.001Search in Google Scholar

[79] Barnes BB, Hu C, Cannizzaro JP, Craig SE, Hallock P, Jones DL, et al. Estimation of diffuse attenuation of ultraviolet light in optically shallow Florida keys waters from MODIS measurements. Remote Sens Environ. 2014;140:519–32.10.1016/j.rse.2013.09.024Search in Google Scholar

[80] Melzner F, Mark FC, Seibel BA, Tomanek L. Ocean acidification and coastal marine invertebrates: Tracking CO2 effects from seawater to the cell. Annu Rev Mar Sci. 2019;12.10.1146/annurev-marine-010419-010658Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[81] Rezanejad K, Guedes Soares C, López I, Carballo R. Experimental and numerical investigation of the hydrodynamic performance of an oscillating water column wave energy converter. Renewable Energy. 2017;106:1–16.10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.003Search in Google Scholar

[82] Miller L, Douglas BC. Gyre‐scale atmospheric pressure variations and their relation to 19th and 20th century sea level rise. Geophys Res Lett. 2007;34:16.10.1029/2007GL030862Search in Google Scholar

[83] Woodworth PL, Melet A, Marcos M, Ray RD, Wöppelmann G, Sasaki YN, et al. Forcing factors affecting sea level changes at the coast. Surv Geophys. 2019;40(6):1351–97.10.1007/s10712-019-09531-1Search in Google Scholar

[84] Pugh D. Changing sea levels: Effects of tides, weather and climate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.Search in Google Scholar

[85] Foster RG, Roenneberg T. Human responses to the geophysical daily, annual and lunar cycles. Curr Biol. 2008;18(17):R784–94.10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[86] Shi B, Cooper JR, Pratolongo PD, Gao S, Bouma TJ, Li G, et al. Erosion and accretion on a mudflat: the importance of very shallow‐water effects. J Geophys Res Ocean. 2017;122(12):9476–99.10.1002/2016JC012316Search in Google Scholar

[87] Lafta AA, Altaei SA, Al-Hashimi NH. Impacts of potential sea-level rise on tidal dynamics in Khor Abdullah and Khor Al-Zubair, northwest of Arabian Gulf. Earth Syst Environ. 2020;4(1):93–105.10.1007/s41748-020-00147-9Search in Google Scholar

[88] Pratolongo PD, Perillo GME, Piccolo MC. Combined effects of waves and plants on a mud deposition event at a mudflat-saltmarsh edge in the Bahía Blanca estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2010;87(2):207–12.10.1016/j.ecss.2009.09.024Search in Google Scholar

[89] Guo H, Ding Y, Liu G, Zhang D, Fu W, Zhang L. Conceptual study of lunar-based SAR for global change monitoring. Sci China Earth Sci. 2014;57(8):1771–9.10.1007/s11430-013-4714-2Search in Google Scholar

[90] Shi W, Wang M, Jiang L. Spring‐neap tidal effects on satellite ocean color observations in the Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, and East China Sea. J Geophys Res Ocean. 2011;116(C12):C12032.10.1029/2011JC007234Search in Google Scholar

[91] Zhou Z, Bian C, Wang C, Jiang W, Bi R. Quantitative assessment on multiple timescale features and dynamics of sea surface suspended sediment concentration using remote sensing data. J Geophys Res Ocean. 2017;122(11):8739–52.10.1002/2017JC013082Search in Google Scholar

[92] Martino RL, Sanderson DD. Fourier and autocorrelation analysis of estuarine tidal rhythmites, lower Breathitt Formation (Pennsylvanian), eastern Kentucky, USA. J Sediment Res. 1993;63(1):105–19.Search in Google Scholar

[93] Lacy JR, Ferner MC, Callaway JC. The influence of neap–spring tidal variation and wave energy on sediment flux in salt marsh tidal creeks. Earth Surf Proc Landf. 2018;43(11):2384–96.10.1002/esp.4401Search in Google Scholar

[94] Lim M, Rosser NJ, Petley DN, Keen M. Quantifying the controls and influence of tide and wave impacts on coastal rock cliff erosion. J Coast Res. 2011;27(1):46–56.10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-09-00061.1Search in Google Scholar

[95] FitzGerald DM. Shoreline erosional-depositional processes associated with tidal inlets. Hydrodynamics and sediment dynamics of tidal inlets. New York: Springer; 1988. p. 186–225.10.1007/978-1-4757-4057-8_11Search in Google Scholar

[96] Nasr D. Coral reefs of the Red Sea with special reference to the Sudanese coastal area. The Red Sea. Berlin: Springer; 2015. p. 453–69.10.1007/978-3-662-45201-1_26Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-06-19
Revised: 2020-11-29
Accepted: 2020-11-30
Published Online: 2020-12-22

© 2020 Mohammed H. Aljahdali and Mohamed Elhag, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. The simulation approach to the interpretation of archival aerial photographs
  3. The application of137Cs and210Pbexmethods in soil erosion research of Titel loess plateau, Vojvodina, Northern Serbia
  4. Provenance and tectonic significance of the Zhongwunongshan Group from the Zhongwunongshan Structural Belt in China: insights from zircon geochronology
  5. Analysis, Assessment and Early Warning of Mudflow Disasters along the Shigatse Section of the China–Nepal Highway
  6. Sedimentary succession and recognition marks of lacustrine gravel beach-bars, a case study from the Qinghai Lake, China
  7. Predicting small water courses’ physico-chemical status from watershed characteristics with two multivariate statistical methods
  8. An Overview of the Carbonatites from the Indian Subcontinent
  9. A new statistical approach to the geochemical systematics of Italian alkaline igneous rocks
  10. The significance of karst areas in European national parks and geoparks
  11. Geochronology, trace elements and Hf isotopic geochemistry of zircons from Swat orthogneisses, Northern Pakistan
  12. Regional-scale drought monitor using synthesized index based on remote sensing in northeast China
  13. Application of combined electrical resistivity tomography and seismic reflection method to explore hidden active faults in Pingwu, Sichuan, China
  14. Impact of interpolation techniques on the accuracy of large-scale digital elevation model
  15. Natural and human-induced factors controlling the phreatic groundwater geochemistry of the Longgang River basin, South China
  16. Land use/land cover assessment as related to soil and irrigation water salinity over an oasis in arid environment
  17. Effect of tillage, slope, and rainfall on soil surface microtopography quantified by geostatistical and fractal indices during sheet erosion
  18. Validation of the number of tie vectors in post-processing using the method of frequency in a centric cube
  19. An integrated petrophysical-based wedge modeling and thin bed AVO analysis for improved reservoir characterization of Zhujiang Formation, Huizhou sub-basin, China: A case study
  20. A grain size auto-classification of Baikouquan Formation, Mahu Depression, Junggar Basin, China
  21. Dynamics of mid-channel bars in the Middle Vistula River in response to ferry crossing abutment construction
  22. Estimation of permeability and saturation based on imaginary component of complex resistivity spectra: A laboratory study
  23. Distribution characteristics of typical geological relics in the Western Sichuan Plateau
  24. Inconsistency distribution patterns of different remote sensing land-cover data from the perspective of ecological zoning
  25. A new methodological approach (QEMSCAN®) in the mineralogical study of Polish loess: Guidelines for further research
  26. Displacement and deformation study of engineering structures with the use of modern laser technologies
  27. Virtual resolution enhancement: A new enhancement tool for seismic data
  28. Aeromagnetic mapping of fault architecture along Lagos–Ore axis, southwestern Nigeria
  29. Deformation and failure mechanism of full seam chamber with extra-large section and its control technology
  30. Plastic failure zone characteristics and stability control technology of roadway in the fault area under non-uniformly high geostress: A case study from Yuandian Coal Mine in Northern Anhui Province, China
  31. Comparison of swarm intelligence algorithms for optimized band selection of hyperspectral remote sensing image
  32. Soil carbon stock and nutrient characteristics of Senna siamea grove in the semi-deciduous forest zone of Ghana
  33. Carbonatites from the Southern Brazilian platform: I
  34. Seismicity, focal mechanism, and stress tensor analysis of the Simav region, western Turkey
  35. Application of simulated annealing algorithm for 3D coordinate transformation problem solution
  36. Application of the terrestrial laser scanner in the monitoring of earth structures
  37. The Cretaceous igneous rocks in southeastern Guangxi and their implication for tectonic environment in southwestern South China Block
  38. Pore-scale gas–water flow in rock: Visualization experiment and simulation
  39. Assessment of surface parameters of VDW foundation piles using geodetic measurement techniques
  40. Spatial distribution and risk assessment of toxic metals in agricultural soils from endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma region in South China
  41. An ABC-optimized fuzzy ELECTRE approach for assessing petroleum potential at the petroleum system level
  42. Microscopic mechanism of sandstone hydration in Yungang Grottoes, China
  43. Importance of traditional landscapes in Slovenia for conservation of endangered butterfly
  44. Landscape pattern and economic factors’ effect on prediction accuracy of cellular automata-Markov chain model on county scale
  45. The influence of river training on the location of erosion and accumulation zones (Kłodzko County, South West Poland)
  46. Multi-temporal survey of diaphragm wall with terrestrial laser scanning method
  47. Functionality and reliability of horizontal control net (Poland)
  48. Strata behavior and control strategy of backfilling collaborate with caving fully-mechanized mining
  49. The use of classical methods and neural networks in deformation studies of hydrotechnical objects
  50. Ice-crevasse sedimentation in the eastern part of the Głubczyce Plateau (S Poland) during the final stage of the Drenthian Glaciation
  51. Structure of end moraines and dynamics of the recession phase of the Warta Stadial ice sheet, Kłodawa Upland, Central Poland
  52. Mineralogy, mineral chemistry and thermobarometry of post-mineralization dykes of the Sungun Cu–Mo porphyry deposit (Northwest Iran)
  53. Main problems of the research on the Palaeolithic of Halych-Dnister region (Ukraine)
  54. Application of isometric transformation and robust estimation to compare the measurement results of steel pipe spools
  55. Hybrid machine learning hydrological model for flood forecast purpose
  56. Rainfall thresholds of shallow landslides in Wuyuan County of Jiangxi Province, China
  57. Dynamic simulation for the process of mining subsidence based on cellular automata model
  58. Developing large-scale international ecological networks based on least-cost path analysis – a case study of Altai mountains
  59. Seismic characteristics of polygonal fault systems in the Great South Basin, New Zealand
  60. New approach of clustering of late Pleni-Weichselian loess deposits (L1LL1) in Poland
  61. Implementation of virtual reference points in registering scanning images of tall structures
  62. Constraints of nonseismic geophysical data on the deep geological structure of the Benxi iron-ore district, Liaoning, China
  63. Mechanical analysis of basic roof fracture mechanism and feature in coal mining with partial gangue backfilling
  64. The violent ground motion before the Jiuzhaigou earthquake Ms7.0
  65. Landslide site delineation from geometric signatures derived with the Hilbert–Huang transform for cases in Southern Taiwan
  66. Hydrological process simulation in Manas River Basin using CMADS
  67. LA-ICP-MS U–Pb ages of detrital zircons from Middle Jurassic sedimentary rocks in southwestern Fujian: Sedimentary provenance and its geological significance
  68. Analysis of pore throat characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs
  69. Effects of igneous intrusions on source rock in the early diagenetic stage: A case study on Beipiao Formation in Jinyang Basin, Northeast China
  70. Applying floodplain geomorphology to flood management (The Lower Vistula River upstream from Plock, Poland)
  71. Effect of photogrammetric RPAS flight parameters on plani-altimetric accuracy of DTM
  72. Morphodynamic conditions of heavy metal concentration in deposits of the Vistula River valley near Kępa Gostecka (central Poland)
  73. Accuracy and functional assessment of an original low-cost fibre-based inclinometer designed for structural monitoring
  74. The impacts of diagenetic facies on reservoir quality in tight sandstones
  75. Application of electrical resistivity imaging to detection of hidden geological structures in a single roadway
  76. Comparison between electrical resistivity tomography and tunnel seismic prediction 303 methods for detecting the water zone ahead of the tunnel face: A case study
  77. The genesis model of carbonate cementation in the tight oil reservoir: A case of Chang 6 oil layers of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in the western Jiyuan area, Ordos Basin, China
  78. Disintegration characteristics in granite residual soil and their relationship with the collapsing gully in South China
  79. Analysis of surface deformation and driving forces in Lanzhou
  80. Geochemical characteristics of produced water from coalbed methane wells and its influence on productivity in Laochang Coalfield, China
  81. A combination of genetic inversion and seismic frequency attributes to delineate reservoir targets in offshore northern Orange Basin, South Africa
  82. Explore the application of high-resolution nighttime light remote sensing images in nighttime marine ship detection: A case study of LJ1-01 data
  83. DTM-based analysis of the spatial distribution of topolineaments
  84. Spatiotemporal variation and climatic response of water level of major lakes in China, Mongolia, and Russia
  85. The Cretaceous stratigraphy, Songliao Basin, Northeast China: Constrains from drillings and geophysics
  86. Canal of St. Bartholomew in Seča/Sezza: Social construction of the seascape
  87. A modelling resin material and its application in rock-failure study: Samples with two 3D internal fracture surfaces
  88. Utilization of marble piece wastes as base materials
  89. Slope stability evaluation using backpropagation neural networks and multivariate adaptive regression splines
  90. Rigidity of “Warsaw clay” from the Poznań Formation determined by in situ tests
  91. Numerical simulation for the effects of waves and grain size on deltaic processes and morphologies
  92. Impact of tourism activities on water pollution in the West Lake Basin (Hangzhou, China)
  93. Fracture characteristics from outcrops and its meaning to gas accumulation in the Jiyuan Basin, Henan Province, China
  94. Impact evaluation and driving type identification of human factors on rural human settlement environment: Taking Gansu Province, China as an example
  95. Identification of the spatial distributions, pollution levels, sources, and health risk of heavy metals in surface dusts from Korla, NW China
  96. Petrography and geochemistry of clastic sedimentary rocks as evidence for the provenance of the Jurassic stratum in the Daqingshan area
  97. Super-resolution reconstruction of a digital elevation model based on a deep residual network
  98. Seismic prediction of lithofacies heterogeneity in paleogene hetaoyuan shale play, Biyang depression, China
  99. Cultural landscape of the Gorica Hills in the nineteenth century: Franciscean land cadastre reports as the source for clarification of the classification of cultivable land types
  100. Analysis and prediction of LUCC change in Huang-Huai-Hai river basin
  101. Hydrochemical differences between river water and groundwater in Suzhou, Northern Anhui Province, China
  102. The relationship between heat flow and seismicity in global tectonically active zones
  103. Modeling of Landslide susceptibility in a part of Abay Basin, northwestern Ethiopia
  104. M-GAM method in function of tourism potential assessment: Case study of the Sokobanja basin in eastern Serbia
  105. Dehydration and stabilization of unconsolidated laminated lake sediments using gypsum for the preparation of thin sections
  106. Agriculture and land use in the North of Russia: Case study of Karelia and Yakutia
  107. Textural characteristics, mode of transportation and depositional environment of the Cretaceous sandstone in the Bredasdorp Basin, off the south coast of South Africa: Evidence from grain size analysis
  108. One-dimensional constrained inversion study of TEM and application in coal goafs’ detection
  109. The spatial distribution of retail outlets in Urumqi: The application of points of interest
  110. Aptian–Albian deposits of the Ait Ourir basin (High Atlas, Morocco): New additional data on their paleoenvironment, sedimentology, and palaeogeography
  111. Traditional agricultural landscapes in Uskopaljska valley (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
  112. A detection method for reservoir waterbodies vector data based on EGADS
  113. Modelling and mapping of the COVID-19 trajectory and pandemic paths at global scale: A geographer’s perspective
  114. Effect of organic maturity on shale gas genesis and pores development: A case study on marine shale in the upper Yangtze region, South China
  115. Gravel roundness quantitative analysis for sedimentary microfacies of fan delta deposition, Baikouquan Formation, Mahu Depression, Northwestern China
  116. Features of terraces and the incision rate along the lower reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River east of Namche Barwa: Constraints on tectonic uplift
  117. Application of laser scanning technology for structure gauge measurement
  118. Calibration of the depth invariant algorithm to monitor the tidal action of Rabigh City at the Red Sea Coast, Saudi Arabia
  119. Evolution of the Bystrzyca River valley during Middle Pleistocene Interglacial (Sudetic Foreland, south-western Poland)
  120. A 3D numerical analysis of the compaction effects on the behavior of panel-type MSE walls
  121. Landscape dynamics at borderlands: analysing land use changes from Southern Slovenia
  122. Effects of oil viscosity on waterflooding: A case study of high water-cut sandstone oilfield in Kazakhstan
  123. Special Issue: Alkaline-Carbonatitic magmatism
  124. Carbonatites from the southern Brazilian Platform: A review. II: Isotopic evidences
  125. Review Article
  126. Technology and innovation: Changing concept of rural tourism – A systematic review
Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/geo-2020-0217/html
Scroll to top button