Startseite A Note on Reference-Dependent Choice with Threshold Representation
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

A Note on Reference-Dependent Choice with Threshold Representation

  • Dan Qin EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 8. Juni 2019

Abstract

This note considers reference-dependent choice procedures shaped by a utility function and a threshold function. Alternatives are considered only when the utility gain of moving from the reference is bigger than the threshold. We impose no requirement on the threshold functions whereas previous works characterize the special case of strictly positive threshold functions. We also examine the case when the threshold function depends on both compared alternatives.

Funding statement: This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Funder Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001691, Grant Number: 16K17091, 18K12739.

A Axiom independence

In this appendix, we show that results are tight. Let X = {x, y, z}. Rows stand for reference alternatives and columns stand for opportunity sets.

x,y,z x,y x,z y,z
y,z y z y,z
x x,y,z x,y x,z
y y,z y y,z
z y,z z y,z

This choice correspondence satisfies eqs. (3) and (5) while violates eq. (4).

x,y,z x,y x,z y,z
x,y,z x,y x,z y,z
x x x x
y x,y y y
z z z z

This choice correspondence satisfies eqs. (4) and (3) while violates 5.

x,y,z x,y x,z y,z
x,y,z x,y x y,z
x x x x
y y y y
z z z z

This choice correspondence satisfies eqs. (4) and (5) while violates eq. (3).

References

Diaye, Marc-Arthur. 1999. “Variable Intervals Model.” Mathematical Social Sciences 38 (1): 21–33.10.1016/S0165-4896(98)00034-1Suche in Google Scholar

Fishburn, Peter C. 1985. “Interval Graphs and Interval Orders.” Discrete Mathematics 55 (2): 135–49.10.1016/0012-365X(85)90042-1Suche in Google Scholar

Masatlioglu, Yusufcan, and Efe A. Ok. 2005. “Rational Choice with Status Quo Bias.” Journal of Economic Theory 121 (1): 1–29.10.1016/j.jet.2004.03.007Suche in Google Scholar

Masatlioglu, Yusufcan, and Efe A. Ok. 2014. “A Canonical Model of Choice with Initial Endowments.” Review of Economic Studies 81 (2): 851–83.10.1093/restud/rdt037Suche in Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Palmero, Carlos. 1997. “A Representation of Acyclic Preferences.” Economics Letters 54 (2): 143–46.10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00015-3Suche in Google Scholar

Suzumura, Kotaro. 1976. “Remarks on the Theory of Collective Choice.” Economica 43 (17): 381–90.10.2307/2553273Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-06-08

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. Optimal Forestry Contract with Interdependent Costs
  3. Bi and Branching Strict Nash Networks in Two-way Flow Models: A Generalized Sufficient Condition
  4. Pay-What-You-Want in Competition
  5. Two Rationales for Insufficient Entry
  6. Students’ Social Origins and Targeted Grading
  7. Pricing, Signalling, and Sorting with Frictions
  8. On the Economic Value of Signals
  9. The Core in Bertrand Oligopoly TU-Games with Transferable Technologies
  10. Reasoning About ‘When’ Instead of ‘What’: Collusive Equilibria with Stochastic Timing in Repeated Oligopoly
  11. Timing Games with Irrational Types: Leverage-Driven Bubbles and Crash-Contingent Claims
  12. Costly Rewards and Punishments
  13. Blocking Coalitions and Fairness in Asset Markets and Asymmetric Information Economies
  14. Strategic Activism in an Uncertain World
  15. On Equilibrium Existence in a Finite-Agent, Multi-Asset Noisy Rational Expectations Economy
  16. Optimal Incentives Under Gift Exchange
  17. Public Good Indices for Games with Several Levels of Approval
  18. Vagueness of Language: Indeterminacy under Two-Dimensional State-Uncertainty
  19. Winners and Losers of Universal Health Insurance: A Macroeconomic Analysis
  20. Behavioral Theory of Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma: Generous Tit-For-Tat Strategy
  21. Flourishing as Productive Tension: Theory and Model
  22. Notes
  23. A Note on Reference-Dependent Choice with Threshold Representation
  24. Regular Equilibria and Negative Welfare Implications in Delegation Games
  25. Unbundling Production with Decreasing Average Costs
  26. A Simple and Procedurally Fair Game Form for Nash Implementation of the No-Envy Solution
  27. Decision Making and Games with Vector Outcomes
  28. Capital Concentration and Wage Inequality
  29. Annuity Markets and Capital Accumulation
Heruntergeladen am 18.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejte-2018-0142/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen