Home Unbundling Production with Decreasing Average Costs
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Unbundling Production with Decreasing Average Costs

  • Oriol Carbonell-Nicolau EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 12, 2019

Abstract

This paper argues that, even in the presence of decreasing average costs of production, monopolies can sometimes be avoided in the interest of market efficiency. It is shown that under certain conditions on the variable cost of production, there is an alternate, viable market structure that reduces the well-known deadweight loss of monopoly: an “upstream” market in which one or more firms own and share the fixed cost of creating and maintaining a distribution network, and a “downstream” market populated by a large number of firms that are charged a unit price for the network’s usage.

JEL Classification: L12; L13

Acknowledgements

This paper benefited from valuable comments provided by Tomas Sjöström and an anonymous referee.

References

Armstrong, M., S. Cowan, and J. Vickers. 1994. Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Armstrong, M. 2002. “The Theory of Access Pricing and Interconnection.” In Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, Volume 1, edited by M. E. Cave, S. K. Majumdar, and I. Vogelsang. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Braeutigam, R. R. 1989. “Optimal Policies for Natural Monopolies.” In Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume II, edited by R. Schmalensee, and R. D. Willig. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.10.1016/S1573-448X(89)02011-XSearch in Google Scholar

Cremer, H., and P. De Donder. 2013. “Network Investment under Legal and Ownership Unbundling.” Review of Network Economics 12: 27–59.10.1515/rne-2012-0012Search in Google Scholar

Kreps, D. M. 2004. Microeconomics for Managers. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Search in Google Scholar

Laffont, J.-J., and J. Tirole. 2000. Competition in Telecommunications. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

McManus, M. 1964. “Equilibrium, Numbers and Size in Cournot Oligopoly.” Yorkshire Bulletin of Social and Economic Research 16: 68–75.10.1111/j.1467-8586.1964.tb00517.xSearch in Google Scholar

Novshek, W. 1985. “On the Existence of Cournot Equilibrium.” Review of Economic Studies 52: 85–98.10.1017/CBO9780511528231.009Search in Google Scholar

Rey, P., and J. Tirole. 2007. “A Primer on Foreclosure.” In Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume III, edited by M. Armstrong, and R. Porter. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.10.1016/S1573-448X(06)03033-0Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, J., and H. Sonnenschein. 1976. “On the Existence of Cournot Equilibrium without Concave Profit Functions.” Journal of Economic Theory 13: 112–17.10.1016/0022-0531(77)90028-XSearch in Google Scholar

Vives, X. 1987. “Small Income Effects: A Marshallian Theory of Consumer Surplus and Downward Sloping Demand.” Review of Economic Studies 54: 87–103.10.2307/2297448Search in Google Scholar

Vives, X. 1999. Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Yi, S-S. 1998. “Endogenous Formation of Joint Ventures with Efficiency Gains.” Rand Journal of Economics 29: 610–31.10.2307/2556107Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-06-12

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Optimal Forestry Contract with Interdependent Costs
  3. Bi and Branching Strict Nash Networks in Two-way Flow Models: A Generalized Sufficient Condition
  4. Pay-What-You-Want in Competition
  5. Two Rationales for Insufficient Entry
  6. Students’ Social Origins and Targeted Grading
  7. Pricing, Signalling, and Sorting with Frictions
  8. On the Economic Value of Signals
  9. The Core in Bertrand Oligopoly TU-Games with Transferable Technologies
  10. Reasoning About ‘When’ Instead of ‘What’: Collusive Equilibria with Stochastic Timing in Repeated Oligopoly
  11. Timing Games with Irrational Types: Leverage-Driven Bubbles and Crash-Contingent Claims
  12. Costly Rewards and Punishments
  13. Blocking Coalitions and Fairness in Asset Markets and Asymmetric Information Economies
  14. Strategic Activism in an Uncertain World
  15. On Equilibrium Existence in a Finite-Agent, Multi-Asset Noisy Rational Expectations Economy
  16. Optimal Incentives Under Gift Exchange
  17. Public Good Indices for Games with Several Levels of Approval
  18. Vagueness of Language: Indeterminacy under Two-Dimensional State-Uncertainty
  19. Winners and Losers of Universal Health Insurance: A Macroeconomic Analysis
  20. Behavioral Theory of Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma: Generous Tit-For-Tat Strategy
  21. Flourishing as Productive Tension: Theory and Model
  22. Notes
  23. A Note on Reference-Dependent Choice with Threshold Representation
  24. Regular Equilibria and Negative Welfare Implications in Delegation Games
  25. Unbundling Production with Decreasing Average Costs
  26. A Simple and Procedurally Fair Game Form for Nash Implementation of the No-Envy Solution
  27. Decision Making and Games with Vector Outcomes
  28. Capital Concentration and Wage Inequality
  29. Annuity Markets and Capital Accumulation
Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejte-2018-0097/html
Scroll to top button