Startseite Philosophie Perception: Ground of Empirical Objectivity
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Perception: Ground of Empirical Objectivity

  • Tyler Burge
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
The Philosophy of Perception
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch The Philosophy of Perception

Abstract

Several types of objectivity are surveyed. The role of perception as a type of empirical objectivity, and as a source for more sophisticated types of objectivity that it itself does not realize, is discussed. Perceptual representation is distinguished from the sort of representation explained in terms of information theory. Perceiving is also distinguished from sensing. Some threads in the history of philosophy that have taken perception not to be a type or source of objectivity are discussed and criticized. Often inevitable limitations on the types of objectivity that perception can embody have been misconstrued as marks of subjectivity. Often perception has been mis-characterized in the interests of one or another philosophical ideology. The irony of this history is that the ultimate basis for the objectivity of the empirical sciences has commonly been miscast in the philosophical tradition.

Abstract

Several types of objectivity are surveyed. The role of perception as a type of empirical objectivity, and as a source for more sophisticated types of objectivity that it itself does not realize, is discussed. Perceptual representation is distinguished from the sort of representation explained in terms of information theory. Perceiving is also distinguished from sensing. Some threads in the history of philosophy that have taken perception not to be a type or source of objectivity are discussed and criticized. Often inevitable limitations on the types of objectivity that perception can embody have been misconstrued as marks of subjectivity. Often perception has been mis-characterized in the interests of one or another philosophical ideology. The irony of this history is that the ultimate basis for the objectivity of the empirical sciences has commonly been miscast in the philosophical tradition.

Kapitel in diesem Buch

  1. Frontmatter I
  2. Content V
  3. Editorial IX
  4. 1. Objectivity and Realism
  5. Perception: Ground of Empirical Objectivity 3
  6. Objectivity: How is it Possible? 23
  7. Realism’s Kick 39
  8. The Good, The Bad, and The Naïve 57
  9. 2. Content and Intentionality
  10. How to Think About the Representational Content of Visual Experience 77
  11. Structure, Intentionality and the Given 95
  12. Brentano on Perception and Illusion 119
  13. The Problem with J. Searle’s Idea That ‘all Seeing is Seeing-as’ (or What Wittgenstein did not Mean With the Duck-Rabbit) 135
  14. 3. Perception, Cognition and Images
  15. The Perception/Cognition Divide: One More Time, With Feeling 149
  16. Why Verbal Understanding is Unlikely to be an Extended Form of Perception 171
  17. Sound and Image 189
  18. 4. The Cognitive Penetrability of Perception
  19. Bias-Driven Attention, Cognitive Penetration and Epistemic Downgrading 199
  20. Pre-Cueing, Early Vision, and Cognitive Penetrability 217
  21. Predictions do not Entail Cognitive Penetration: “Racial” Biases in Predictive Models of Perception 235
  22. 5. Epistemology of Perception
  23. Boundless 251
  24. The Manifest and the Philosophical Image of Perceptual Knowledge 275
  25. The Co-Presentational Character of Perception 303
  26. Knowledge Without Observation: Body Image or Body Schema? 323
  27. 6. Perception and the Sciences
  28. Scheinbewegungen. Wahrnehmung zwischen Wissensgeschichte und Gegenwartskunst 337
  29. Zur Analogie von Wittgensteins Konzept des Aspektwechsels und der wissenschaftlichen Metapher als Vehikel der Innovation 357
  30. 7. Wittgenstein
  31. The Structure of Tractatus and the Tractatus Numbering System 377
  32. Wittgensteins Welt 399
  33. Index of Names 417
Heruntergeladen am 17.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110657920-001/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen