Startseite Enzymatic sensor of putrescine with optical oxygen transducer – mathematical model of responses of sensitive layer
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Enzymatic sensor of putrescine with optical oxygen transducer – mathematical model of responses of sensitive layer

  • Lucie Maixnerová EMAIL logo , Alexandar Horvitz , Gabriela Kuncová , Michal Přibyl , Marek Šebela und Martin Koštejn
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 28. November 2014
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A biosensor for putrescine containing a sensing layer with an optical oxygen probe based on ruthenium complex and the enzyme diamine oxidase from pea is described. The diamine oxidase was pre-immobilised on broken micro-beads modified with a ferrofluid. The pre-immobilised enzyme and ruthenium complex were both incorporated into the UV-cured inorganic-organic hybrid polymer ORMOCER® and deposited on a lens to form a sensitive layer of 210 μm in thickness. The sensitivity to the putrescine concentration determined under air saturation was between 3.50 μs L mmol−1 and 4.50 μs L mmol−1 in a hundred experiments conducted intermittently over a one year period. With the oxygen concentration increasing from 10 % to 100 % of DO (dissolved oxygen), the biosensor sensitivity decreased from 6.87 μs L mmol−1 to 0.70 μs L mmol−1 and its dynamic range increased from 0.10 mmol L−1 to 1.75 mmol L−1. To estimate the behaviour of the putrescine sensor in parametric space, a mathematical model of the reaction-transport processes inside the sensing layer was developed. The model revealed the qualitative relations between the sensor analytical features, the characteristics of the sensitive layer and concentrations of substrates. The results of the mathematical modelling may serve as guidelines in the design of optodes for specific applications.

References

Akin, M., Prediger, A., Yuksel, M., Höpfner, T., Demirkol, D. O., Beutel, S., Timur, S., & Scheper, T. (2011). A new set up for multi-analyte sensing: At-line bio-process monitoring.10.1016/j.bios.2011.05.018Suche in Google Scholar

Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 26, 4532-4537. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2011.05.018.10.1016/j.bios.2011.05.018Suche in Google Scholar

Bóka, B., Adanyi, N., Virag, D., Sebela, M., & Kiss, A. (2012). Spoilage detection with biogenic amine biosensors, comparison of different enzyme electrodes. Electroanalysis, 24, 181-186. DOI: 10.1002/elan.201100419.10.1002/elan.201100419Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, J. Q., & McShane, M. J. (2006). Modeling of spherical fluorescent glucose microsensor systems: Design of enzymatic smart tattoos. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 21, 1760-1769. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2005.08.013.10.1016/j.bios.2005.08.013Suche in Google Scholar

Cai, Y. K., Shinar, R., Zhou, Z. Q., & Shinar, J. (2008). Multianalyte sensor array based on an organic light emitting diode platform. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 134, 727-735. DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2008.06.019.10.1016/j.snb.2008.06.019Suche in Google Scholar

Healey, B. G., Li, L., &Walt, D. R. (1997). Multianalyte biosensors on optical imaging bundles. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 12, 521-529. DOI: 10.1016/s0956-5663(97)00009-2.10.1016/S0956-5663(97)00009-2Suche in Google Scholar

Höber, R., Hitchcock, D. I., Bateman, J. B., Goddard, D. R., & Fenn, W. O. (1946). Physical chemistry of cells and tissues. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 50, 386-387. DOI: 10.1021/j150448a010.10.1021/j150448a010Suche in Google Scholar

Illanes, A., Altamirano, C., & Wilson, L. (2008). Homogeneous enzyme kinetics. In A. Illanes (Ed.), Enzyme biocatalysis (pp. 129-130). Houten, The Netherlands: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8361-7 3.10.1007/978-1-4020-8361-7Suche in Google Scholar

Kumar, V., Dooley, D. M., Freeman, H. C., Guss, J. M., Harvey, I., McGuirl, M. A., Wilce, M. C. J., & Zubak, V. M. (1996). Crystal structure of a eukaryotic (pea seedling) copper-containing amine oxidase at 2.2 ˚A resolution. Structure, 4, 943-955. DOI: 10.1016/s0969-2126(96)00101-3.10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00101-3Suche in Google Scholar

Kuncová, G., & Šandova, M. (2007). Glucose optical sensor for bioreactors [motion picture]. Czech Republic, _c Sanda, s.r.o. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTJwmRK3oZ4 and http://ds-uchp-backup.asuch.cas.cz:5000/fbsharing/ilGRdL0X Suche in Google Scholar

Li, X. P., & Rosenzweig, Z. (1997). A fiber optic sensor for rapid analysis of bilirubin in serum. Analytica Chimica Acta, 353, 263-273. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(97)87785-9.10.1016/S0003-2670(97)87785-9Suche in Google Scholar

Marazuela, M. D., Cuesta, B., Moreno-Bondi, M. C., & Quejido, A. (1997). Free cholesterol fiber-optic biosensor for serum samples with simplex optimization. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 12, 233-240. DOI: 10.1016/s0956-5663(97)85341-9.10.1016/S0956-5663(97)85341-9Suche in Google Scholar

Meškauskas, T., Ivanauskas F., & Laurinavicius, V. (2013). Degradation of substrate and/or product: mathematical modeling of biosensor action. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 51, 2491-2502. DOI: 10.1007/s10910-013-0223-y.10.1007/s10910-013-0223-ySuche in Google Scholar

Mitsubayashi, K., Kon, T., & Hashimoto, Y. (2003). Optical bio-sniffer for ethanol vapor using an oxygen-sensitive optical fiber. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 19, 193-198. DOI: 10.1016/s0956-5663(03)00218-5.10.1016/S0956-5663(03)00218-5Suche in Google Scholar

Netrabukkana, R., Lourvanij, K., & Rorrer, G. L. (1996). Diffusion of glucose and glucitol in microporous and mesoporous silicate/aluminosilicate catalysts. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 35, 458-464. DOI: 10.1021/ie950200x.10.1021/ie950200xSuche in Google Scholar

Pasic, A., Koehler, H., Klimant, I., & Schaupp, L. (2007). Miniaturized fiber-optic hybrid sensor for continuous glucose monitoring in subcutaneous tissue. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 122, 60-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2006.05.010.10.1016/j.snb.2006.05.010Suche in Google Scholar

Pierangelli, E., Levin, V. A., Seidenfeld, J., & Marton, L. J. (1981). Putrescine diffusion in cat brain and capillary permeability in rat brain: Relation to CSF putrescine levels in brain tumor patients. European Journal of Cancer, 17, 143-147. DOI: 10.1016/0014-2964(81)90028-1.10.1016/0014-2964(81)90028-1Suche in Google Scholar

Pospiskova, K., Safarik, I., Sebela, M., & Kuncova, G. (2013). Magnetic particles-based biosensor for biogenic amines using an optical oxygen sensor as a transducer. Microchimica Acta, 180, 311-318. DOI: 10.1007/s00604-012-0932-0.10.1007/s00604-012-0932-0Suche in Google Scholar

Psoma, S. D., van der Wal, P. D., & de Rooij, N. F. (2011). Low fluorescence enzyme matrices based on microfabricated SU-8 films for a phenol micro-biosensor application. Procedia Engineering, 25, 1369-1372. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.12. 338.Suche in Google Scholar

Rassaei, L., Olthuis, W., Tsujimura, S., Sudhölter, E. J. R., & van den Berg, A. (2014). Lactate biosensors: current status and outlook. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 406, 123-137. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-013-7307-1.10.1007/s00216-013-7307-1Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Romero, M. R., Baruzzi, A. M., & Garay, F. (2012). Mathematical modeling and experimental results of a sandwich-type amperometric biosensor. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 162, 284-291. DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2011.12.079.10.1016/j.snb.2011.12.079Suche in Google Scholar

Scully, P. J., Betancor, L., Bolyo, J., Dzyadevych, S., Guisan, J. M., Fernandez-Lafuente, R., Jaffrezic-Renault, N., Kuncova, G., Matějec, V., O’Kennedy, B., Podrazky, O., Rose, K., Sasek, L., & Young, J. S. (2011). Optical fibre biosensors using enzymatic transducers to monitor glucose. Measurement Science and Technology, 18, 3177-3186. DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/18/10/s20.10.1088/0957-0233/18/10/S20Suche in Google Scholar

Shrivastava, A., & Gupta, V. B. (2011). Methods for the determination of limit of detection and limit of quantitation of the analytical methods. Chronicles of Young Scientists, 2, 21-25. DOI: 10.4103/2229-5186.79345.10.4103/2229-5186.79345Suche in Google Scholar

Steiner, M. S., Duerkop, A., & Wolfbeis, O. S. (2011). Optical methods for sensing glucose. Chemical Society Reviews, 40, 4805-4839. DOI: 10.1039/c1cs15063d.10.1039/c1cs15063dSuche in Google Scholar

Štikonien˙e, O., Ivanauskas, F., & Laurinavicius, V. (2010). The influence of external factors on the operational stability of the biosensor response. Talanta, 81, 1245-1249. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.02.016.10.1016/j.talanta.2010.02.016Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, X. D., & Wolfbeis, O. S. (2014). Optical methods for sensing and imaging oxygen: materials, spectroscopies and applications. Chemical Society Reviews, 43, 3666-3761. DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00039k.10.1039/C4CS00039KSuche in Google Scholar

Wolfbeis, O. S. (1991). Optical sensing based on analyte recognition by enzymes, carriers and molecular interactions. Analytica Chimica Acta, 250, 181-201. DOI: 10.1016/0003-2670(91)85071-y.10.1016/0003-2670(91)85071-YSuche in Google Scholar

Wu, X. J., & Choi, M. M. F. (2003). Hydrogel network entrapping cholesterol oxidase and octadecylsilica for optical biosensing in hydrophobic organic or aqueous micelle solvents. Analytical Chemistry, 75, 4019-4027. DOI: 10.1021/ac020736+.10.1021/ac020736+Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Wu, X. J., & Choi, M. M. F. (2004). Spongiform immobilization architecture of ionotropy polymer hydrogel coentrapping alcohol oxidase and horseradish peroxidase with octadecylsilica for optical biosensing alcohol in organic solvent. Analytical Chemistry, 76, 4279-4285. DOI: 10.1021/ac049799d.10.1021/ac049799dSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

Wu, X. J., Choi, M. M. F., Chen, C. S., & Wu, X. M. (2007). On-line monitoring of methanol in n-hexane by an organicphase alcohol biosensor. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 22, 1337-1344. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2006.06.002.10.1016/j.bios.2006.06.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Xiao, D., & Choi, M. M. F. (2002). Aspartame optical biosensor with bienzyme-immobilized eggshell membrane and oxygensensitive optode membrane. Analytical Chemistry, 74, 863-870. DOI: 10.1021/ac001097a. 10.1021/ac001097aSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2014-3-31
Revised: 2014-8-4
Accepted: 2014-8-6
Published Online: 2014-11-28
Published in Print: 2015-1-1

© 2015 Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Biosensors – Topical issue
  2. Biosensors containing acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase as recognition tools for detection of various compounds
  3. Electrochemical enzymatic biosensors based on metal micro-/nanoparticles-modified electrodes: a review
  4. Gluconobacter sp. cells for manufacturing of effective electrochemical biosensors and biofuel cells
  5. Application of nanomaterials in microbial-cell biosensor constructions
  6. Use of green fluorescent proteins for in vitro biosensing
  7. Biosensors based on molecular beacons
  8. DNA aptamer-based detection of prostate cancer
  9. Can glycoprofiling be helpful in detecting prostate cancer?
  10. Graphene as signal amplifier for preparation of ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensors
  11. Electrochemical nanostructured biosensors: carbon nanotubes versus conductive and semi-conductive nanoparticles
  12. Surface plasmon resonance application in prostate cancer biomarker research
  13. Improvement of enzyme carbon paste-based biosensor using carbon nanotubes for determination of water-soluble analogue of vitamin E
  14. Enzymatic sensor of putrescine with optical oxygen transducer – mathematical model of responses of sensitive layer
  15. Detection of hydrogen peroxide and glucose by enzyme product precipitation on sensor surface
  16. Interfacing of microbial cells with nanoparticles: Simple and cost-effective preparation of a highly sensitive microbial ethanol biosensor
  17. Whole-cell optical biosensor for mercury – operational conditions in saline water
  18. Synthesis of carbon quantum dots for DNA labeling and its electrochemical, fluorescent and electrophoretic characterization
  19. Detection of short oligonucleotide sequences of hepatitis B virus using electrochemical DNA hybridisation biosensor
  20. Aptamer-based detection of thrombin by acoustic method using DNA tetrahedrons as immobilisation platform
  21. Interactions of antifouling monolayers: Energy transfer from excited albumin molecule to phenol red dye
  22. Third-generation oxygen amperometric biosensor based on Trametes hirsuta laccase covalently bound to graphite electrode
  23. Can voltammetry distinguish glycan isomers?
Heruntergeladen am 27.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/chempap-2015-0041/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen