Relationship between learner creativity, task planning, and speaking performance in L2 narrative tasks

References

Acar, Selcuk & Mark A. Runco. 2019. Divergent thinking: New methods, recent research, and extended theory. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 13(2). 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000231.Suche in Google Scholar

Albert, Ágnes. 2008. Creativity and oral narrative task performance: A study of first year English majors. Hungary: Eötvös Loránd University dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Albert, Ágnes. 2011. When individual differences come into play: The effect of learner creativity on simple and complex task performance. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance, 239–265. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.2.16ch9Suche in Google Scholar

Albert, Ágnes & Judit Kormos. 2004. Creativity and narrative task performance: An exploratory study. Language Learning 54(2). 277–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00256.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Ayyildiz, Pınar & Adem Yilmaz. 2021. ‘Moving the Kaleidoscope’ to see the effect of creative personality traits on creative thinking dispositions of preservice teachers: The mediating effect of creative learning environments and teachers’ creativity fostering behavior. Thinking Skills and Creativity 41. 100879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100879.Suche in Google Scholar

Cortes, Robert A., Adam B. Weinberger, Richard J. Daker & Adam E. Green. 2019. Re-examining prominent measures of divergent and convergent creativity. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 27. 90–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.09.017.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod (ed.). 2005. Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.11Suche in Google Scholar

Ferrándiz, Carmen, Mercedes Ferrando, Gloria Soto, Marta Sáinz & María Dolores Prieto. 2017. Divergent thinking and its dimensions: What we talk about and what we evaluate? Anales de psicología 33(1). 40–47.Suche in Google Scholar

Fink, Andreas, Thomas Reim, Mathias Benedek & Roland H. Grabner. 2020. The effects of a verbal and a figural creativity training on different facets of creative potential. Journal of Creative Behavior 54. 676–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.402.Suche in Google Scholar

Foster, Pauline & Peter Skehan. 1999. The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research 3(3). 215–247. https://doi.org/10.1191/136216899672186140.Suche in Google Scholar

George, Derren & Paul Mallery. 2010. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update, 10th edn. Boston: Pearson.Suche in Google Scholar

Grajzel, Katalin, Selcuk Acar & Gage Singer. 2023. The Big Five and divergent thinking: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences 214. 112338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112338.Suche in Google Scholar

Gregersen, Tammy & Sarah Mercer (eds.). 2022. The Routledge handbook of the psychology of language learning and teaching. New York & London: Routledge.10.4324/9780429321498Suche in Google Scholar

Guilford, Joy P. 1950. Creativity. American Psychologist 5. 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487.Suche in Google Scholar

Guilford, Joy P. 1959. Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist 14(8). 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046827.Suche in Google Scholar

Guilford, Joy P. 1968. Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications, 1st edn. San Diego: R. R. Knapp.Suche in Google Scholar

Heilmann, John J., Raúl Rojas, Aquiles Iglesias & Jon F. Miller. 2016. Clinical impact of wordless picture storybooks on bilingual narrative language production: A comparison of the ‘Frog’ stories. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 51(3). 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12201.Suche in Google Scholar

Housen, Alex, Folkert Kuiken & Ineke Vedder. 2012. Complexity, accuracy and fluency: Definitions, measurement and research. In Alex Housen, Folkert Kuiken & Ineke Vedder (eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA, 1–20. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.32.01houSuche in Google Scholar

Ivancovsky, Tal, Simone Shamay-Tsoory, Joo Lee, Hiroaki Morio & Jenny Kurman. 2019. A dual process model of generation and evaluation: A theoretical framework to examine cross-cultural differences in the creative process. Personality and Individual Differences 139. 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.012.Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark D. & Mahmoud Abdi Tabari. 2022. Task planning and oral L2 production: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics 43(6). 1143–1164. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac026.Suche in Google Scholar

Jones, Rodney H. & Jack C. Richard (eds.). 2016. Creativity in language teaching: Perspectives from research and practice. New York & London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Kaufman, James C. 2016. Creativity 101, 2nd edn. New York: Springer.10.1891/9780826129536Suche in Google Scholar

Kaufman, James C., Jason C. Cole & John Baer. 2009. The construct of creativity: Structural model for self-reported creativity ratings. The Journal of Creative Behavior 43(2). 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01310.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Kormos, Judit. 2006. Speech production and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Kourtali, Nektaria-Efstathia & Andrea Révész. 2020. The roles of recasts, task complexity, and aptitude in child second language development. Language Learning 70(1). 179–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12374.Suche in Google Scholar

Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In June Helm (ed.), Essays in the verbal and visual arts, 12–44. Seattle, Washington: University of Washington Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Levelt, Willem. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Li. 2016. Thinking skills and creativity in second language education: Where are we now? Thinking Skills and Creativity 22. 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Shaofeng, Phil Hiver & Mostafa Papi (eds.). 2022. The Routledge handbook of second language Acquisition and individual differences. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003270546Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Shaofeng & Huijun Zhao. 2021. The methodology of the research on language aptitude: A systematic review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 41. 25–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190520000136.Suche in Google Scholar

Lubart, Todd I. 1994. Creativity. In Robert J. Sternberg (ed.), Thinking and problem solving, 289–332. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-08-057299-4.50016-5Suche in Google Scholar

Lubart, Todd I. & Branden Thornhill-Miller. 2019. Creativity: An overview of the 7C’s of creative thought. In Robert J. Sternberg & Joachim Funke (eds.), The psychology of human thought: An introduction, 277–305. Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Mayer, Mercer. 1967. A boy, a dog and a frog. New York: Dial Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Mayer, Mercer. 1969. Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Press.Suche in Google Scholar

McCarthy, Philip M. & Scott Jarvis. 2010. MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods 42(2). 381–392. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.42.2.381.Suche in Google Scholar

McDonough, Kim, William J. Crawford & Alison Mackey. 2015. Creativity and EFL students’ language use during a group problem-solving task. Tesol Quarterly 49(1). 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.211.Suche in Google Scholar

Montanari, Simona. 2004. The development of narrative competence in the L1 and L2 of Spanish-English bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism 8(4). 449–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069040080040301.Suche in Google Scholar

Ortega, Lourdes, Noriko Iwashita, John M. Norris & Sara Rabie. 2002. An investigation of elicited imitation tasks in crosslinguistic SLA research. Paper presented at the 20th Second Language Research Forum, Toronto, October 3–6, 2002 [Unpublished handout retrieved from IRIS].Suche in Google Scholar

Ortega, Lourdes, Noriko Iwashita, Sara Rabie & John M. Norris. 1999. A multilanguage comparison of measures of syntactic complexity. Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai’I.Suche in Google Scholar

Ottó, István. 1998. The relationship between individual differences in learner creativity and language learning success. Tesol Quarterly 32(4). 763–773. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588011.Suche in Google Scholar

Plonsky, Luke & Hessameddin Ghanbar. 2018. Multiple regression in L2 research: A methodological synthesis and guide to interpreting R2 values. The Modern Language Journal 102(4). 713–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12509.Suche in Google Scholar

Plonsky, Luke & Frederick L. Oswald. 2014. How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning 64. 878–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079.Suche in Google Scholar

Qin, Jie. 2019. Effects of repeated practice in pre-task planning on the acquisition of English personal pronouns by Chinese EFL learners. System 81(2). 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.010.Suche in Google Scholar

Qin, Jie & Dilin Liu. 2024. Introducing/testing new SFL-inspired communication/content/function-focused measures for assessing L2 narrative task performance. Applied Linguistics 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amae030.Suche in Google Scholar

Qin, Jie & Yan Zhang. 2022. Pre-task planning and discourse cohesion: Analysis of Chinese EFL learners’ referential use in oral narratives. Language Teaching Research 26(1). 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819883896.Suche in Google Scholar

Simonton, Dean K. 2008. Bilingualism and creativity. In Jeanette Altarriba & Roberto R. Heredia (eds.), An introduction to bilingualism: Principles and processes, 147–166. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter. 1998. A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1177/003368829802900209Suche in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter. 2009. Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics 30(4). 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047.Suche in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter (ed.). 2014. Processing perspectives on task performance. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.5Suche in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Shungo, Toshinori Yasuda, Keiko Hanzawa & Judit Kormos. 2022. How does creativity affect second language speech production? The moderating role of speaking task type. Tesol Quarterly 56(4). 1320–1344. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3104.Suche in Google Scholar

Tavakoli, Parveneh & Peter Skehan. 2005. Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In Rod Ellis (ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language, 239–273. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.11.15tavSuche in Google Scholar

Tin, Tan Bee. 2013. Towards creativity in ELT: The need to say something new. ELT Journal 67(4). 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct022.Suche in Google Scholar

Torrance, Ellis Paul. 1966. Torrance tests of creative thinking, Research edn. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Torrance, Ellis Paul. 1969. Creativity: What research says to the teacher. Washington, DC: National Education Association.Suche in Google Scholar

Torrance, Ellis Paul. 1987. Guidelines for administration and scor- ing/comments on using the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.Suche in Google Scholar

Xie, Yuanhua, Liqun Jiang & Xudong Wu. 2021. Zhongguo xuexizhe chuangzhaoli, zhunbei shijian yu koutou xushi renwu biaoxian yanjiu [Creativity, planning time and oral narrative task performance of Chinese EFL learners]. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages 44(2). 100–108.Suche in Google Scholar