Home Linguistics & Semiotics Incidental learning of collocations through reading an academic text
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Incidental learning of collocations through reading an academic text

  • Inés de la Viña ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Christina S. Kim ORCID logo and Gloria Chamorro ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: July 15, 2024

Abstract

This study investigated the incidental learning of collocations in two reading modes (reading-only (RO), reading-while-listening (RWL)), taking into account additional learner- and collocation-related predictors of learning (e.g., congruency). An academic text was used, as this could be a useful source for vocabulary learning for university-level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Sixty-eight advanced Spanish EFL learners read a text containing 14 target collocations, in the RO or the RWL condition. Learning gains were measured in terms of form recall and form recognition. Results showed that collocations can be learnt incidentally from reading. While reading mode did not influence learning, congruency and prior vocabulary knowledge improved form recall, emphasising the importance of features specific to individual learners and collocations for vocabulary learning.


Corresponding author: Inés de la Viña, Departamento de Filologías Extranjeras y sus Lingüísticas, Facultad de Filología, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Paseo Senda del Rey 7, despacho 004, 28040 Madrid, Spain, E-mail:

Funding source: University of Kent

Award Identifier / Grant number: Vice Chancellor research scholarship

  1. Research ethics: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  2. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: This study was supported by the graduate Vice Chancellor research funding from at the University of Kent (http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001316). The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

  5. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

Altenberg, Bengt & Sylviane Granger. 2001. The grammatical and lexical patterning of MAKE in native and non-native student writing. Applied Linguistics 22(2). 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.2.173Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, Rolf Harald, Doug J. Davidson & Douglas Bates. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4). 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005Search in Google Scholar

Barr, Dale J., Roger Levy, Christoph Scheepers & Harry J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3). 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48.10.18637/jss.v067.i01Search in Google Scholar

Boers, Frank & Stuart Webb. 2015. Gauging the semantic transparency of idioms: Do natives and learners see eye to eye? In Roberto R. Heredia & Anna B. Cieślicka (eds.), Bilingual figurative language processing, 368–392. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139342100.018Search in Google Scholar

Boers, Frank & Stuart Webb. 2018. Teaching and learning collocation in adult second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching 51(1). 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444817000301Search in Google Scholar

British Council, StudyPortals. 2021. The changing landscape of English-taught programmes. https://studyportals.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/British-Council_Studyportals_The-changing-landscape-of-English-taught-programmes-in-2021.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Brown, Dale. 2011. What aspects of vocabulary knowledge do textbooks give attention to? Language Teaching Research 15(1). 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383345Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Xi, Gloria Ramirez, Yang C. Luo, Esther Geva & Yu-min Ku. 2012. Comparing vocabulary development in Spanish-and Chinese-speaking ELLs: The effects of metalinguistic and sociocultural factors. Reading and Writing 25(8). 1991–2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9318-7Search in Google Scholar

Cobb, Tom. n.d. Web VP Classic v.8 [Computer Program]. Available at: http://www.lextutor.ca/.Search in Google Scholar

Conklin, Kathy, Sara Alotaibi, Ana Pellicer-Sánchez & L. Laura Vilkaite-Lozdiene. 2020. What eye-tracking tells us about reading-only and reading-while-listening in a first and second language. Second Language Research 36. 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320921496Search in Google Scholar

Cowie, Anthony P. (ed.). 1998. Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198294252.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Coxhead, Averil. 2000. A new academic word list. Tesol Quarterly 34(2). 213–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951Search in Google Scholar

Coxhead, Averil. 2020. Academic vocabulary. In Stuart Webb (ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies, 97–110. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780429291586-7Search in Google Scholar

Dang, Thi Ngoc Yen, Cailing Lu & Stuart Webb. 2021. Incidental learning of single words and collocations through viewing an academic lecture. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44(3). 708–736. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263121000474Search in Google Scholar

Dang, Thi Ngoc Yen, Cailing Lu & Stuart Webb. 2022. Incidental learning of collocations in an academic lecture through different input modes. Language Learning 72(3). 728–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12499Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2008. Corpus of contemporary American English (COCA). Retrieved from: http://www.english-corpora.org/coca/.Search in Google Scholar

Domínguez-Figaredo, Daniel, Inés Gil-Jaurena & Javier Morentin-Encina. 2022. The impact of rapid adoption of online assessment on students’ performance and perceptions: Evidence from a distance learning university. Electronic Journal of e-Learning 20(3). 224–241. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.3.2399Search in Google Scholar

Gablasova, Dana, Vaclav Brezina & Anthony McEnery. 2017. Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning 67(S1). 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12225Search in Google Scholar

Gaebel, Michael, Thérèse Zhang, Henriette Stoeber & Alison Morrisroe. 2021. Digitally enhanced learning and teaching in European higher education institutions. Brussels: European University Association (EUA).Search in Google Scholar

González-Fernández, Beatriz & Norbert Schmitt. 2015. How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have? ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics 166(1). 94–126. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.166.1.03ferSearch in Google Scholar

Grabe, William. 2009. Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139150484Search in Google Scholar

Henriksen, Birgit & Pete Westbrook. 2017. Responding to research challenges related to studying L2 collocational use in professional academic discourse. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction 6(1). 32–47.10.7820/vli.v06.1.HenriksenSearch in Google Scholar

Hulstijn, Jan Hendrik. 2003. Incidental and intentional learning. In Catherine J. Doughty & Michael H. Long (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, 349–381. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756492.ch12Search in Google Scholar

Leiner, Dominik J. 2019. SoSci survey (version 3.1.0) (computer software). Available at https://www.soscisurvey.deSearch in Google Scholar

Lin, Phoebe. 2012. Sound evidence: The missing piece of the Jigsaw in formulaic language research. Applied Linguistics 33(3). 342–347. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams017Search in Google Scholar

Lüdecke, Daniel, Mattan Ben-Shachar, Indrajeet Patil, Philip Waggoner & Dominique Makowski. 2021. Performance: An R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. Journal of Open Source Software 6(60). 3139. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03139Search in Google Scholar

Macis, Marijana & Norbert Schmitt. 2017. Not just ‘Small Potatoes’: Knowledge of the idiomatic meanings of collocations. Language Teaching Research 21(3). 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816645957Search in Google Scholar

Malone, Jonathan. 2018. Incidental vocabulary learning in SLA: Effects of frequency, aural enhancement, and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40(3). 651–675. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263117000341.Search in Google Scholar

Marian, Viorica, Henrike K. Blumenfeld & Margarita Kaushanskaya. 2007. Language experience and proficiency questionnaire. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 50(4). 940–967. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067)Search in Google Scholar

Martinez, Ron & Victoria A. Murphy. 2011. Effect of frequency and idiomaticity in second language reading comprehension. Tesol Quarterly 45(2). 267–290. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.247708Search in Google Scholar

McEnery, Anthony, Richard Xiao & Yukio Tono. 2006. Corpus-based language studies. An advanced resource book. London/New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Meunier, Fanny. 2012. Formulaic language and language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32. 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190512000128Search in Google Scholar

Milton, James. 2013. Measuring the contribution of vocabulary knowledge to proficiency in the four skills. In Camilla Bardel, Christina Lindqvist & Batia Laufer (eds.), L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge and use: New perspectives on assessment and corpus analysis. EUROSLA monograph series 2, 57–78. Colchester, UK: EUROSLA. https://www.eurosla.org/monographs/EM02/EM02home.php.Search in Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. Paul. 2012. Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, Thi My Hang & Stuart Webb. 2017. Examining second language receptive knowledge of collocation and factors that affect learning. Language Teaching Research 21(3). 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816639619Search in Google Scholar

Nesselhauf, Nadja. 2003. The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics 24(2). 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.2.223Search in Google Scholar

Northbrook, Julian & Kathy Conklin. 2019. Is what you put in what you get out? textbook-derived lexical bundle processing in beginner English learners. Applied Linguistics 40(5). 816–833. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy027Search in Google Scholar

Pellicer-Sánchez, Ana. 2017. Learning L2 collocations incidentally from reading. Language Teaching Research 21(3). 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815618428Search in Google Scholar

Peters, Elke. 2016. The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors. Language Teaching Research 20(1). 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814568131Search in Google Scholar

Puimège, Eva & Elke Peters. 2020. Learning formulaic sequences through viewing L2 television and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42(3). 525–549. https://doi.org/10.1017/s027226311900055xSearch in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.0.1). In R foundation for statistical computing. Vienna: Austria.Search in Google Scholar

Richards, Jack C & Richard Schmidt. 2002. Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics, 1st ed. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833835.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, Norbert & Diane Schmitt. 2020. Vocabulary in language teaching, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108569057Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, Norbert, Diane Schmitt & Caroline Clapham. 2001. Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing 18(1). 55–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800103Search in Google Scholar

Serrano, Raquel. 2023. Extensive reading and science vocabulary learning in L2: ComparingReading-only and reading-while-listening. Education Sciences 13(5). 493.10.3390/educsci13050493Search in Google Scholar

Serrano, Raquel & Ana Pellicer-Sánchez. 2022. Young L2 learners’ online processing of information in a graded reader during reading-only and reading-while-listening conditions: A study of eye-movements. Applied Linguistics 13. 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2018-0102.Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 2004. Trust the text: Lexis, corpus, discourse. London: Routledge..10.4324/9780203594070Search in Google Scholar

Sonbul, Suhad & Norbert Schmitt. 2013. Explicit and implicit lexical knowledge: Acquisition of collocations under different input conditions. Language Learning 63(1). 121–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00730.xSearch in Google Scholar

Sweller, John, Jeroen J. G. Van Merrienboer & Fred G. Paas. 1998. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10(3). 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:102219372820510.1023/A:1022193728205Search in Google Scholar

Szudarski, Pawel. 2012. Effects of meaning-and form-focused instruction on the acquisition of verb-noun collocations in L2 English. Journal of Second Language Teaching & Research 1(2). 3–37.Search in Google Scholar

Szudarski, Pawel. 2023. Collocations, corpora and language learning (elements in corpus linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press..10.1017/9781108992602Search in Google Scholar

Szudarski, Pawel & Ronald Carter. 2016. The role of input flood and input enhancement in EFL learners’ acquisition of collocations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 26(2). 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12092Search in Google Scholar

Toomer, Mark & Irina Elgort. 2019. The development of implicit and explicit knowledge of collocations: A conceptual replication and extension of Sonbul and Schmitt (2013). Language Learning 69(2). 405–439.10.1111/lang.12335Search in Google Scholar

Tuzcu, Ayşen. 2023. The effects of input mode in learning declarative and nondeclarative knowledge of L2 collocations. System 113. 103006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103006Search in Google Scholar

Vandergrift, Larry & Christine C. M. Goh. 2012. Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

VanPatten, Bill. 1996. Input Processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Vidal, Karina. 2011. A comparison of the effects of reading and listening on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning 61(1). 219–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00593.xSearch in Google Scholar

Vilkaitė, Laura. 2017. Incidental acquisition of collocations in L2: Effects of adjacency and prior vocabulary knowledge. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 168(2). 248–277. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.17005.vilSearch in Google Scholar

Vu, Duy Van & Elke Peters. 2023. A longitudinal study on the effect of mode of reading on incidental collocation learning and predictors of learning gains. Tesol Quarterly 57(1). 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3111Search in Google Scholar

Vu, Duy Van, Ann-Sophie Noreillie & Elke Peters. 2023. Incidental collocation learning from reading-while-listening and captioned TV viewing and predictors of learning gains. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221151048.Search in Google Scholar

Vu, Duy Van & Elke Peters. 2022a. Incidental learning of collocations from meaningful input: A longitudinal study into three reading modes and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44(3). 685–707. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263121000462Search in Google Scholar

Vu, Duy Van & Elke Peters. 2022b. Learning L2 vocabulary from reading-only, reading-while-listening, and reading with textual input enhancement: Insights from Vietnamese EFL learners. RELC Journal 53(1). 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220911485Search in Google Scholar

Vu, Duy Van & Marije Michel. 2021. An exploratory study on the aspects of vocabulary knowledge addressed in EAP textbooks. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 10. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.51751/dujal9345Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Yuchen. (2023). ‘It is the easiest thing to do’: university students’ perspectives on the role of lecture recording in promoting inclusive education in the UK. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2162814Search in Google Scholar

Webb, Stuart & Anna Chang. 2022. How does mode of input affect the incidental learning of collocations? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44(1). 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263120000297Search in Google Scholar

Webb, Stuart, Jonathan Newton & Anna Chang. 2013. Incidental learning of collocation. Language Learning 63. 91–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00729.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wickham, Hadley, Romain François, Lionel Henry, Kirill Müller & Davis Vaughan. 2023. dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. R package version 1.1.4. Available at: https://github.com/tidyverse/dplyr, https://dplyr.tidyverse.orgSearch in Google Scholar

Wolter, Brent & Henrik Gyllstad. 2011. Collocational links in the L2 mental lexicon and the influence of L1 intralexical knowledge. Applied Linguistics 32(4). 430–449. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr011Search in Google Scholar

Yamashita, Junko. 2018. Possibility of semantic involvement in the L1-L2 congruency effect in the processing of L2 collocations. Journal of Second Language Studies 1(1). 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.17024.yamSearch in Google Scholar

Yamashita, Junko & Nan Jiang. 2010. L1 influence on the acquisition of L2 collocations: Japanese ESL users and EFL learners acquiring English collocations. Tesol Quarterly 44(4). 647–668. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.235998Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0307).


Received: 2023-12-01
Accepted: 2024-06-07
Published Online: 2024-07-15
Published in Print: 2025-11-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. Learning academic vocabulary through reading online news
  4. A Q methodological study into pre-service Chinese as a foreign language (CFL) teachers’ mindsets about teaching competencies
  5. Assessing written production in L2 Mandarin Chinese: fluency and accuracy
  6. Machine translation as a form of feedback on L2 writing
  7. Acquisition of collocations under different glossing modalities and the mediating role of learners’ perceptual learning style
  8. Unpacking changing emotions in multiple contexts: idiodynamic study of college students’ academic emotions
  9. Exploring L2 learners’ processing of unknown words during subtitled viewing through self-reports
  10. Model text as corrective feedback in L2 writing: the role of working memory and vocabulary size
  11. Exploring learner-related variables in child collaborative writing: interaction mindset, willingness to communicate and proficiency
  12. Contributions of significant others to second language teacher well-being: a self-determination theory perspective
  13. The stone left unturned: boredom among young EFL learners
  14. The impact of out-of-school L2 input and interaction on adolescent classroom immersion and community-L2 learners’ L2 vocabulary: opportunities for interaction are key
  15. Promoting interaction and lowering speaking anxiety in an EMI course: a group dynamic assessment approach
  16. Relationship between learner creativity, task planning, and speaking performance in L2 narrative tasks
  17. Influencing factors of L2 writers’ engagement in an assessment as learning-focused context
  18. The cognitive-emotional dialectics in second language development: speech and co-speech gestures of Chinese learners of English
  19. Impact of task type and task complexity on negotiation of meaning in young learners of Chinese as a second language
  20. Effects of working memory and task type on syntactic complexity in EFL learners’ writing
  21. Assessing effects of source text complexity on L2 learners’ interpreting performance: a dependency-based approach
  22. Incidental learning of collocations through reading an academic text
  23. Listenership always matters: active listening ability in L2 business English paired speaking tasks
  24. Enhancing the processing advantage: two psycholinguistic investigations of formulaic expressions in Chinese as a second language
  25. The effect of form presentation mode and language learning aptitude on the learning burden and decay of L2 vocabulary knowledge
  26. Examining the impact of foreign language anxiety and language contact on oral proficiency: a study of Chinese as a second language learners
  27. The dynamics of changes in linguistic complexity and writing scores in timed argumentative writing among beginning-level EFL learners
  28. Perception of English semivowels by Japanese-speaking learners of English
  29. Corrigendum
  30. Corrigendum to: Development and validation of Questionnaire for Self-regulated Learning Writing Strategies (QSRLWS) for EFL learners
Downloaded on 1.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2023-0307/html
Scroll to top button