Home Periodic and fixed points for mappings in extended b-gauge spaces equipped with a graph
Article Open Access

Periodic and fixed points for mappings in extended b-gauge spaces equipped with a graph

  • Nosheen Zikria , Maria Samreen EMAIL logo , Ekrem Savas , Manuel De la Sen and Tayyab Kamran
Published/Copyright: August 30, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This article presents the notions of extended b-gauge space ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) and extended J φ ; Ω -families of generalized extended pseudo-b-distances on U . Furthermore, we look at these extended J φ ; Ω -families on U and define the extended J φ ; Ω -sequential completeness. We also look into some fixed and periodic point theorems for set-valued mappings in the new space with a graph that does not meet the completeness condition of the space. Additionally, this article includes some examples to explain the corresponding results and highlights some important consequences of our obtained results.

MSC 2010: 47H10; 54H25

1 Introduction

In 1922, Banach [1] achieved a pivotal milestone in fixed-point theory, presenting a result of profound significance. Subsequently, notable generalizations, including those by Hardy and Rogers [2], Mustafa et al. [3], and Khan et al. [4], have significantly advanced the field of fixed-point theory.

Jachymaski [5] also generalized the Banach contraction to Banach G -contraction by defining graph G = ( V , E ) in U × U , where V (the set of vertices) coincides with the nonempty set U and E (the set of edges) contains the diagonal but has no parallel edge. He proved that the conclusion of Banach result remained valid if the contraction condition holds for those ordered pairs that belong to the set of edges.

Later on, many researchers extended Banach G -contraction and obtained fixed-point results for mappings defined on complete metric spaces (Samreen and Kamran [68], Tiammee and Suantai [9], Nicolae et al. [10], Bojor [11], Asl et al. [12], Ahmad et al. [13], Petrusel and Petrusel [14], and Jiddah et al. [15]).

The study of gauge spaces was initiated by Dugundji [16], which generalizes metric spaces. Gauge spaces have the characteristic that the distance between two different points of the space may be zero. This simple characterization has been fascinating for many researchers around the world. For more definitions and results in gauge spaces, we recommend the researchers to refer to Agarwal et al. [17], Frigon [18], Chifu and Petrusel [19], Chis and Precup [20], Cherichi et al. [21], Cherichi and Samet [22], and Lazar and Petrusel [23].

Given a quasi-gauge space ( U , Q ) , Wlodarczyk and Plebaniak [24] have introduced the notion of left (right) J -families of generalized quasi-pseudodistances on U . These families generated by quasi-gauge Q determine a structure on U , which is more general than the structure on U determined by Q , and provide useful tools to obtain more general results with weaker assumptions, which can be seen in [2531].

The aim of this article is to introduce the definition of an extended b -gauge space and an extended J φ ; Ω -family produced by extended b -gauge space ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) . Next, inspired by the idea of Ali et al. [32], Ali and Din [33], new G -contraction and α -contraction conditions with respect to this new extended family J φ ; Ω of distances have been defined, and novel fixed and periodic point theorems are proved. Our results do not need completeness of the spaces ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) . Moreover, they provide information about periodic points as well and substantially generalize and improve the famous theorems of G -contractions and α -contractions in the proceeding of fixed points (in particular, see [32,33]). Multiple examples explaining ideas, definitions, and results are given.

2 Preliminaries

This section aims to recollect the relevant background material needed throughout this article.

Throughout this article, U is a non-void set, 2 U symbolizes the power set of the space U excluding the empty set, and R + indicates the set of nonnegative real numbers. The collection of all fixed points of a multi-valued mapping T : U 2 U symbolized by F ( T ) is defined by F ( T ) = { u U : u T ( u ) } , and the collection of all periodic points of T symbolized by P ( T ) is defined by P ( T ) = { u U : u T [ k ] ( u ) for some k in N } , where T [ k ] = T T T T ( k -times).

In 1966, Dugundji [16] initiated the idea of gauge spaces that generalizes metric spaces (or more generally pseudo-metric spaces). Here, we discuss the topology induced by gauge spaces and the condition in which these spaces are Hausdorff.

Definition 2.1

A map q : U × U [ 0 , ) is a pseudo-metric, if for all e , f , g U , it satisfies

  1. q ( e , e ) = 0 ;

  2. q ( e , f ) = q ( f , e ) ; and

  3. q ( e , g ) q ( e , f ) + q ( f , g ) .

The pair ( U , q ) is said to be pseudo-metric space.

Definition 2.2

Each family Q = { q β : β Ω } of pseudo-metrics q β : U × U [ 0 , ) for β Ω is said to be gauge on U .

Definition 2.3

The family Q = { q β : β Ω } of pseudo-metrics q β : U × U [ 0 , ) for β Ω is called to be separating if for each pair ( e , f ) where e f , there is q β Q such that q β ( e , f ) > 0 .

Definition 2.4

Let Q = { q β : β Ω } be a family of pseudo-metrics on U . The topology T ( Q ) on U whose subbase is defined by the family ( Q ) = { B ( e , ε β ) : e U , ε β > 0 , β Ω } of all balls B ( e , ε β ) = { f U : q β ( e , f ) < ε β } is called the induced topology.

Definition 2.5

A topological space ( U , T ) is called a gauge space if there exists gauge Q on U with T = T ( Q ) . The pair ( U , T ( Q ) ) denotes the gauge space and is Hausdorff if Q is separating.

Example 2.6

Let U = R 2 and let q 1 , q 2 : U × U [ 0 , ) be defined for all ( e 1 , f 1 ) , ( e 2 , f 2 ) R 2 by

q 1 ( ( e 1 , f 1 ) , ( e 2 , f 2 ) ) = e 2 e 1 and q 2 ( ( e 1 , f 1 ) , ( e 2 , f 2 ) ) = f 2 f 1 .

Then, q 1 and q 2 are pseudo-metrics on U .

Note that q 1 ( ( 2 , 3 ) , ( 2 , 5 ) ) = 2 2 = 0 , but ( 2 , 3 ) and ( 2 , 5 ) are distinct points. Also, q 2 ( ( 3 , 6 ) , ( 5 , 6 ) ) = 6 6 = 0 , but ( 3 , 6 ) and ( 5 , 6 ) are the distinct points. Therefore, q 1 and q 2 are not metrics on U .

Let the family Q = { q 1 , q 2 } be a gauge on U . We now look for the topology T ( Q ) induced by gauge Q in the following manner.

First, finding balls B ( e , ε 1 ) for q 1 , where e = ( e 1 , f 1 ) U and ε 1 > 0 :

B ( ( e 1 , f 1 ) , ε 1 ) = { ( e 2 , f 2 ) U : q 1 ( ( e 1 , f 1 ) , ( e 2 , f 2 ) ) < ε 1 } = { ( e 2 , f 2 ) U : e 2 ( ε 1 + e 1 , ε 1 + e 1 ) } .

Thus, B ( ( e 1 , f 1 ) , ε 1 ) contains all verticle strips in the plane.

Similarly,

B ( ( e 1 , f 1 ) , ε 2 ) = { ( e 2 , f 2 ) U : q 2 ( ( e 1 , f 1 ) , ( e 2 , f 2 ) ) < ε 2 } = { ( e 2 , f 2 ) U : f 2 ( ε 2 + f 1 , ε 2 + f 1 ) } .

Thus, B ( ( e 1 , f 1 ) , ε 2 ) contains all horizontal strips in the plane.

The subbase ( Q ) for induced topology T ( Q ) is the collection of all vertical and horizontal infinite open strips. Their intersections are open rectangles that form the base of induced topology. The induced topology is thus the usual topology on R 2 . Therefore, ( U , Q ) is a gauge space.

In order to generalize metric spaces, Bakhtin [34] introduced the notion of b -metric spaces in 1989, which was formally presented by Czerwik [35] in 1993 in the following way.

Definition 2.7

A map q : U × U R + is said to be a b -metric, if for each e , f , g U , there exists s 1 such that it satisfies

  1. q ( e , f ) = 0 e = f ;

  2. q ( e , f ) = q ( f , e ) ;

  3. q ( e , g ) s { q ( e , f ) + q ( f , g ) } .

The pair ( U , q ) is said to be a b -metric space.

Recently, Ali et al. [32] introduced the notion of b -gauge spaces and thus extended the idea of gauge spaces in the locale of b -metric spaces. We note down the following definitions of their work.

Definition 2.8

A map q : U × U [ 0 , ) is a b -pseudo-metric, if there is s 1 satisfying for all e , f , g U the following conditions:

  1. q ( e , e ) = 0 ;

  2. q ( e , f ) = q ( f , e ) ; and

  3. q ( e , g ) s { q ( e , f ) + q ( f , g ) } .

For prescribed b -pseudo-metric q , ( U , q ) is called the b -pseudo-metric space.

Definition 2.9

Each family Q = { q β : β Ω } of b -pseudo-metrics q β : U × U [ 0 , ) , is called the b -gauge on U .

Definition 2.10

The family Q = { q β : β Ω } is separating if for each pair ( e , f ) , where e f , there is q β Q such that q β ( e , f ) > 0 .

Definition 2.11

Let Q = { q β : β Ω } be the family of b -pseudo-metrics on U . The topology T ( Q ) on U whose subbase is defined by the family ( Q ) = { B ( e , ε β ) : e U , ε β > 0 , β Ω } , where B ( e , ε β ) = { f U : q β ( e , f ) < ε β } is called the topology induced by Q . The pair ( U , T ( Q ) ) is called to be a b -gauge space and is Hausdorff if Q is separating.

Ali et al. [32] presented the following example to show that b -pseudo-metric space (in fact, b -gauge space) is the generalization of metric space, pseudo-metric space (in fact, gauge space), and b -metric space.

Example 2.12

[32] Suppose U = C ( [ 0 , ) , R ) and describe q : U × U [ 0 , ) by

q ( u ( t ) , v ( t ) ) = max t [ 0 , 1 ] ( u ( t ) v ( t ) ) 2 .

Then, d is a b -pseudo-metric, but not a metric, pseudo-metric or b -metric.

In 2017, Kamran et al. [36] enriched the notion of b -metric space by amending the triangular inequality and presented the following definition of extended b -metric space in view of generalizing b -metric space.

Definition 2.13

Let φ : U × U [ 1 , ) . A map q : U × U R + is said to be an extended b -metric, if for all e , f , g U , it satisfies

  1. q ( e , f ) = 0 e = f ;

  2. q ( e , f ) = q ( f , e ) ;

  3. q ( e , g ) φ ( e , g ) { q ( e , f ) + q ( f , g ) } .

The pair ( U , q ) or simply U is called an extended b -metric space.

3 Main results

In order to introduce extended b -gauge spaces, we start here the introduction of the notion of extended pseudo- b metric.

Definition 3.1

[37] A map q : U × U R + is an extended pseudo- b -metric, if for all e , f , g U , there exists φ : U × U [ 1 , ) satisfying the following conditions:

  1. q ( e , e ) = 0 ;

  2. q ( e , f ) = q ( f , e ) ; and

  3. q ( e , g ) φ ( e , g ) { q ( e , f ) + q ( f , g ) } .

The pair ( U , q ) is said to be an extended pseudo- b -metric space.

Example 3.2

Suppose U = [ 0 , 1 ] . Define q : U × U R + and φ : U × U [ 1 , ) by

q ( e , f ) = ( e f ) 2

and

φ ( e , f ) = e + f + 2 ,

for all e , f U .

Then, q is an extended pseudo- b -metric on U . Indeed, q ( e , e ) = 0 and q ( e , f ) = q ( f , e ) for all e , f U . Furthermore, for all e , f , g U , q ( e , g ) φ ( e , g ) { q ( e , f ) + q ( f , g ) } holds.

Example 3.3

Let U = { e , f , g } . Define q : U × U R + and φ : U × U [ 1 , ) for all e , f , g U by

q ( e , e ) = 0 ,

q ( e , f ) = q ( f , e ) = 1 ,

q ( f , g ) = q ( g , f ) = 1 2 ,

q ( g , e ) = q ( e , g ) = 2 ,

and

φ ( e , f ) = e + f + 2 .

Furthermore, q ( e , g ) φ ( e , g ) { q ( e , f ) + q ( f , g ) } is satisfied. Indeed, q is an extended pseudo- b -metric on U . Note that q is not a pseudo-metric on U as 3 2 = q ( e , f ) + q ( f , g ) < q ( e , g ) = 2 .

This example illustrates that an extended pseudo- b -metric serves as a generalization or extension of a pseudo-metric.

Definition 3.4

The family Q φ ; Ω = { q β : β Ω } of extended pseudo- b -metrics q β : U × U [ 0 , ) , β Ω , is said to be an extended b -gauge on U ( Ω -index set).

Definition 3.5

The family Q φ ; Ω = { q β : β Ω } of extended pseudo- b -metrics q β : U × U [ 0 , ) , β Ω is called to be separating if for every pair ( e , f ) , where e f , there exists q β Q φ ; Ω such that q β ( e , f ) 0 .

Definition 3.6

Let the family Q φ ; Ω = { q β : β Ω } be an extended b -gauge on U . The topology T ( Q φ ; Ω ) on U whose subbase is defined by the family ( Q φ ; Ω ) = { B ( e , ε β ) : e U , ε β > 0 , β Ω } of all balls B ( e , ε β ) = { f U : q β ( e , f ) < ε β } is called the topology induced by Q φ ; Ω . The topological space ( U , T ( Q φ ; Ω ) ) is an extended b -gauge space, denoted by ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) . We note that ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) is Hausdorff if Q φ ; Ω is separating.

Remark 3.7

For s β = 1 , for each β Ω , each gauge space is a b s -gauge space, and for φ β ( u , v ) = s , for each β Ω , where s 1 , each b -gauge space is an extended b -gauge space. Hence, extended b -gauge space is the largest general space.

Next, we establish the idea of extended J φ ; Ω -families of generalized extended pseudo- b -distances on U (which are called extended J φ ; Ω -families on U , for short). These extended J φ ; Ω -families generalize extended b -gauges.

Definition 3.8

The family J φ ; Ω = { J β : β Ω } , where J β : U × U [ 0 , ) , β Ω , is called an extended J φ ; Ω -family of generalized extended pseudo- b -distances on ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) if the following statements hold for all u , v , w U and for all β Ω :

  1. J β ( u , w ) φ β ( u , w ) { J β ( u , v ) + J β ( v , w ) } ;

  2. for each sequences ( u m : m N ) and ( v m : m N ) in U fulfilling

    (3.1) lim m sup n > m J β ( u m , u n ) = 0

    and

    (3.2) lim m J β ( v m , u m ) = 0 ,

    the following holds:

    (3.3) lim m q β ( v m , u m ) = 0 .

We denote

J ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) = { J φ ; Ω : J φ ; Ω = { J β : β Ω } } .

Also, we denote

U J φ ; Ω 0 = { u U : J β ( u , u ) = 0 , for all β Ω }

and

U J φ ; Ω + = { u U : J β ( u , u ) > 0 , for all β Ω } .

Thus, U = U J φ ; Ω 0 U J φ ; Ω + .

Example 3.9

Let U contain at least two distinct elements, and suppose Q φ ; Ω = { q β : β Ω } is an extended b -gauge on U . Thus, ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) is an extended b -gauge space.

Let there be at least two distinct but arbitrary and fixed elements in a set F U . Let a β ( 0 , ) satisfy δ β ( F ) < a β , where δ β ( F ) = sup { q β ( e , f ) : e , f F } , for all β Ω . Let J β : U × U [ 0 , ) for all e , f U be defined as

(3.4) J β ( e , f ) = q β ( e , f ) , if  F { e , f } = { e , f } , a β , if  F { e , f } { e , f } .

Then, J φ ; Ω = { J β : β Ω } J ( U , Q ) .

Note that J β ( e , g ) φ β ( e , g ) { J β ( e , f ) + J β ( f , g ) } , for all e , f , g U ; thus, ( J 1 ) is satisfied. Indeed, ( J 1 ) will not satisfied only when there is some e , f , g U such that J β ( e , g ) = a β , J β ( e , f ) = q β ( e , f ) , J β ( f , g ) = q β ( f , g ) , and φ β ( e , g ) { q β ( e , f ) + q β ( f , g ) } a β . However, then this gives rise to an element h { e , g } with h F , and on other hand, e , f , g F , which is impossible.

Next, assume that (3.1) and (3.2) hold by the sequences ( u m ) and ( v m ) in U . Then, (3.2) yields that for all 0 < ε < a β , there exists m 1 = m 1 ( β ) N such that

(3.5) J β ( v m , u m ) < ε for all m m 1 , for all β Ω .

By (3.5) and (3.4), denoting m 2 = min { m 1 ( β ) : β Ω } , we have

F { v m , u m } = { v m , u m } , for all m m 2

and

q β ( v m , u m ) = J β ( v m , u m ) < ε .

Thus, (3.3) is satisfied. Therefore, J φ ; Ω is a J φ ; Ω -family on U .

We now state few trivial characteristics of extended J φ ; Ω -families on U .

Remark 3.10

Let ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) be an extended b -gauge space. Then, the following hold:

  1. Q φ ; Ω J ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) .

  2. Let J φ ; Ω J ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) . If for all β Ω and for all u , v U \ J β ( v , v ) = 0 and J β ( u , v ) = J β ( v , u ) , then for each β Ω , J β is an extended pseudo- b -metric.

  3. Several examples of J φ ; Ω J ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) , which show that the maps J β , β Ω are not the extended pseudo- b -metrics can be found in the literature (see [37], Example 3).

Proposition 3.11

Let ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) be a Hausdorff extended b-gauge space and the family J φ ; Ω = { J β : β Ω } be an extended J φ ; Ω -family on U. Then, there exists β Ω such that

e f J β ( e , f ) > 0 J β ( f , e ) > 0 ,

for each e , f U .

Proof

Let that there be e f , e , f U such that J β ( e , f ) = 0 = J β ( f , e ) for all β Ω . Then, J β ( e , e ) = 0 , for all β Ω ; using property ( J 1 ) in Definition 3.8, it follows that J β ( e , e ) φ β ( e , e ) { J β ( e , f ) + J β ( f , e ) } = 0 , for all β Ω .

Defining sequences ( u m ) and ( v m ) in U by u m = f and v m = e , we see that Conditions (3.1) and (3.2) of property ( J 2 ) are satisfied, and therefore, Condition (3.3) holds, which implies that q β ( e , f ) = 0 , for all β Ω . But this denies the fact that ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) is a Hausdorff extended b -gauge space. Therefore, our supposition is wrong, and there exists β Ω such that for all e , f U ,

e f J β ( e , f ) > 0 J β ( f , e ) > 0 .

We now define extended J φ ; Ω -completeness in an extended b -gauge space ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) , using extended J φ ; Ω -families on U .

Definition 3.12

Let J φ ; Ω = { J β : β Ω } be an extended J φ ; Ω -family on the extended b -gauge space ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) .

  1. A sequence ( v m : m N ) is an extended J φ ; Ω -Cauchy sequence in U if

    lim m sup n > m J β ( v m , v n ) = 0 , for all β Ω .

  2. The sequence ( v m : m N ) is extended J φ ; Ω -convergent to v U if lim m J φ ; Ω v m = v , where

    lim m J φ ; Ω v m = v lim m J β ( v , v m ) = 0 = lim m J β ( v m , v ) , for all β Ω .

  3. If S ( v m : m N ) J φ ; Ω , where

    S ( v m : m N ) J φ ; Ω = { v U : lim m J φ ; Ω v m = v } ,

    then ( v m : m N ) in U is an extended J φ ; Ω -convergent sequence in U .

  4. The space ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) is called extended J φ ; Ω -sequentially complete, if every extended J φ ; Ω -Cauchy sequence in U , extended J φ ; Ω -converges in U .

Remark 3.13

There exist examples of extended b -gauge space ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) and J φ ; Ω -family on U with J φ ; Ω Q φ ; Ω such that ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) is J φ ; Ω -sequential complete but not Q φ ; Ω -sequential complete (see [38], Example 3.10).

Definition 3.14

Let T : U 2 U be a set-valued map. The map T [ k ] is said to be an extended Q φ ; Ω -closed map on U , for some k N , if for each sequence ( w m : m N ) in T [ k ] ( U ) , which is extended Q φ ; Ω -convergent in U , one has S ( w m : m N ) Q φ ; Ω and its subsequences ( f m ) and ( z m ) satisfy

f m T [ k ] ( z m ) , for all m N

has the property that there exists w S ( w m : m N ) Q φ ; Ω such that w T [ k ] ( w ) .

Definition 3.15

Let J φ ; Ω = { J β : β Ω } be an extended J φ ; Ω -family on extended b -gauge space ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) . A set Y 2 U is J φ ; Ω -closed in U if Y = c l U J φ ; Ω ( Y ) , where c l U J φ ; Ω ( Y ) is the J φ ; Ω -closure on Y in U , denotes the collection of all u U for which there is a sequence ( u m : m N ) in Y such that it is J φ ; Ω -converges to u .

Define C l J φ ; Ω ( U ) = { Y 2 U : Y = c l U J φ ; Ω ( Y ) } . Thus, C l J φ ; Ω ( U ) indicates the set of all J φ ; Ω -closed subsets of U .

Definition 3.16

Let J φ ; Ω = { J β : β Ω } be an extended J φ ; Ω -family on extended b -gauge space U , and let for all e U , for all F 2 U , and for all β Ω ,

J β ( e , F ) = inf { J β ( e , g ) : g F } .

Define on C l J φ ; Ω ( U ) the distance D β J φ ; Ω of Hausdorff type for all β Ω and for all E , F C l J φ ; Ω ( U ) , where D β J φ ; Ω : C l J φ ; Ω ( U ) × C l J φ ; Ω ( U ) [ 0 , ) , β Ω is defined as follows:

D β J φ ; Ω ( E , F ) = max { sup e E J β ( e , F ) , sup f F J β ( f , E ) } , if the maximum exists; , otherwise.

Throughout this article, Ω indicates an index-set and ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) is an extended b -gauge space equipped with the graph G = ( V , E ) such that V (the set of vertices) is the set U and E (the set of edges) includes { ( v , v ) : v V } . Also, suppose that G has no parallel edges.

Furthermore, note that for each theorem and corollary, it is assumed that ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) is extended J φ ; Ω -sequentially complete.

We first proof the following result.

Lemma 3.17

Let ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) be an extended b-gauge space, and let J φ ; Ω = { J β : β Ω } , where J β : U × U [ 0 , ) , be an extended J φ ; Ω -family on U. Then,

J β ( u , A ) φ β ( u , A ) { J β ( u , v ) + J β ( v , A ) } ,

for all u , v U , for all β Ω , and for all A U , where

φ β ( u , A ) = inf { φ β ( u , a ) : a A } .

Proof

From axioms of definition, we can write for all β Ω ,

J β ( u , a ) φ β ( u , a ) { J β ( u , v ) + J β ( v , a ) } , for all  u , v , a U J β ( u , a ) φ β ( u , a ) J β ( u , v ) + φ β ( u , a ) J β ( v , a ) .

By taking infimum of both sides over A , we obtain for all β Ω ,

inf a A J β ( u , a ) inf a A φ β ( u , a ) J β ( u , v ) + inf a A φ β ( u , a ) inf a A J β ( v , a )

J β ( u , A ) φ β ( u , A ) J β ( u , v ) + φ β ( u , A ) J β ( v , A )

J β ( u , A ) φ β ( u , A ) { J β ( u , v ) + J β ( v , A ) } .

Our main results for set-valued G -contractions are now given below.

Theorem 3.18

Let the set-valued map T : U C l J φ ; Ω ( U ) and φ β : U × U [ 1 , ) for each β Ω satisfy

(3.6) D β J φ ; Ω ( T u , T v ) a β J β ( u , v ) + b β J β ( u , T u ) + c β J β ( v , T v ) + e β J β ( u , T v ) + L β J β ( v , T u ) ,

for all ( u , v ) E , where a β , b β , c β , e β , L β 0 is such that a β + b β + c β + 2 e β φ β ( z m 1 , T z m ) < 1 and lim m , n φ β ( z m , z n ) μ β < 1 , for some μ β < 1 and each z 0 U , here z m T ( z m 1 ) , for m N .

Moreover, let

  1. there is z 0 U and z 1 T z 0 such that ( z 0 , z 1 ) E ;

  2. if ( u , v ) E and x T u and y T v such that J β ( x , y ) J β ( u , v ) , for all β Ω , then ( x , y ) E ;

  3. for any { r β : r β > 1 } β Ω and u U , there exists v T u such that

    J β ( u , v ) r β J β ( u , T u ) , f o r a l l β Ω .

Then, the following assertions hold:
  1. For any z 0 U , ( z m : m { 0 } N ) is an extended Q φ ; Ω -convergent sequence in U; thus, S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω .

  2. Moreover, suppose that for some k N , T [ k ] is an extended Q φ ; Ω -closed map on U. Then,

    1. F ( T [ k ] ) and

    2. there exists z F ( T [ k ] ) such that z S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω .

Proof

(I) Using supposition ( i ) , there is z 0 , z 1 U such that z 1 T z 0 and ( z 0 , z 1 ) E . Now, for each β Ω , applying (3.6), we have

(3.7) D β J φ ; Ω ( T z 0 , T z 1 ) a β J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) + b β J β ( z 0 , T z 0 ) + c β J β ( z 1 , T z 1 ) + e β J β ( z 0 , T z 1 ) + L β J β ( z 1 , T z 0 ) .

Now as J β ( z 1 , T z 1 ) D β J φ ; Ω ( T z 0 , T z 1 ) and J β ( z 0 , T z 1 ) φ β ( z 0 , T z 1 ) { J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) + J β ( z 1 , T z 1 ) } , therefore (3.7) implies

(3.8) J β ( z 1 , T z 1 ) 1 ζ β J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) ,

where ζ β = 1 c β e β φ ( z 0 , T z 1 ) a β + b β + e β φ ( z 0 , T z 1 ) > 1 . Now using assumption ( i i i ) , we have z 2 T z 1 such that

(3.9) J β ( z 1 , z 2 ) ζ β J β ( z 1 , T z 1 ) .

Combining (3.8) and (3.9), we can write

(3.10) J β ( z 1 , z 2 ) 1 ζ β J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) , for all β Ω .

Assumption ( i i ) and (3.10) imply that ( z 1 , z 2 ) E . Following the same steps, we find a sequence ( z m : m { 0 } N ) in U such that ( z m , z m + 1 ) E and

(3.11) J β ( z m , z m + 1 ) 1 ζ β m J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) , for all β Ω .

For convenience, let μ β = 1 ζ β , for each β Ω .

Now, by repeated use of ( J 1 ) and (3.11) for all β Ω and for all n > m , where m , n N , we obtain

J β ( z m , z n ) φ β ( z m , z n ) μ β m J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) + φ β ( z m , z n ) φ β ( z m + 1 , z n ) μ β m + 1 J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) + φ β ( z m , z n ) φ β ( z m + 1 , z n ) φ β ( z m + 2 , z n ) μ β m + 2 J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) + + φ β ( z m , z n ) φ β ( z m + 1 , z n ) φ β ( z n 1 , z n ) μ β n 1 J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) [ φ β ( z 1 , z n ) φ β ( z 2 , z n ) φ β ( z m , z n ) μ β m + φ β ( z 1 , z n ) φ β ( z 2 , z n ) φ β ( z m , z n ) φ β ( z m + 1 , z n ) μ β m + 1 + + φ β ( z 1 , z n ) φ β ( z 2 , z n ) φ β ( z m , z n ) φ β ( z n 1 , z n ) μ β n 1 ] .

Since for some μ β < 1 , lim n , m φ β ( z m + 1 , z n ) μ β < 1 , by ratio test, the series m = 1 μ β m i = 1 m φ β ( z i , z n ) is convergent. Let S = m = 1 μ β m i = 1 m φ β ( z i , z n ) and S m = j = 1 m μ β j i = 1 j φ β ( z i , z n ) .

This gives

J β ( z m , z n ) J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) [ S n 1 S m ] .

This implies

(3.12) lim m sup n > m J β ( z m , z n ) = 0 , for all β Ω .

Now, since ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) is an extended J φ ; Ω -sequentially complete b -gauge space, so ( z m : m { 0 } N ) is extended J φ ; Ω convergent in U ; thus for all z S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) J φ ; Ω , we have

(3.13) lim m J β ( z , z m ) = 0 , for all β Ω .

Thus, from (3.12) and (3.13), fixing z S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) J φ ; Ω , taking ( u m = z m : m { 0 } N ) and ( v m = z : m { 0 } N ) , and applying ( J 2 ) to these sequences, we obtain

lim m q β ( z , z m ) = lim m q β ( v m , u m ) = 0 , for all β Ω .

This implies S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω .

(II) To show ( a 1 ) , let z 0 U be fixed and arbitrary. Since S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω and

z ( m + 1 ) k T [ k ] ( z m k ) , for m { 0 } N

thus describing ( z m = z m 1 + k : m N ) , we obtain

( z m : m N ) T [ k ] ( U ) ,

S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω = S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω ,

also, its subsequences

( y m = z ( m + 1 ) k ) T [ k ] ( U )

and

( x m = z m k ) T [ k ] ( U )

satisfy

y m T [ k ] ( x m ) , for all m N ,

and are extended Q φ ; Ω -convergent to each point z S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω . Thus, applying the fact below

S ( z m : m N ) Q φ ; Ω S ( y m : m N ) Q φ ; Ω and S ( z m : m N ) Q φ ; Ω S ( x m : m N ) Q φ ; Ω

and the assumption that T [ k ] is an extended Q φ ; Ω -closed map on U , for some k N , there exists z S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω = S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω such that z T [ k ] ( z ) .

Thus, ( a 1 ) holds.

The statement ( a 2 ) follows from ( a 1 ) and the certainty that S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω .□

Let T : U U be a single-valued mapping. We have the following result.

Theorem 3.19

Let the single-valued map T : U U and φ β : U × U [ 1 , ) for each β Ω satisfy

(3.14) J β ( T u , T v ) a β J β ( u , v ) + b β J β ( u , T u ) + c β J β ( v , T v ) + e β J β ( u , T v ) + L β J β ( v , T u ) ,

for all ( u , v ) E , where a β , b β , c β , e β , L β 0 is such that a β + b β + c β + 2 e β φ β ( z m 1 , T z m ) < 1 and lim m , n φ β ( z m , z n ) μ β < 1 , for some μ β < 1 and each z 0 U , here z m = T [ m ] ( z 0 ) , where m N .

Moreover,

  1. there exists z 0 U such that ( z 0 , T z 0 ) E ;

  2. for ( u , v ) E , we have ( T u , T v ) E , given that J β ( T u , T v ) J β ( u , v ) for all β Ω ;

  3. if a sequence ( z m : m N ) in U is such that ( z m , z m + 1 ) E and lim m J φ ; Ω z m = z , then ( z m , z ) E and ( z , z m ) E .

Then, the following assertions hold:
  1. For each z 0 U , ( z m : m { 0 } N ) is an extended Q φ ; Ω -convergent sequence in U; thus, S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω .

  2. Moreover, suppose that T [ k ] is an extended Q φ ; Ω -closed map on U, for some k N and φ β ( z , T z ) { c β + e β lim m φ β ( z m , T z ) } < 1 . Then,

    1. F ( T [ k ] ) ;

    2. there exists z F ( T [ k ] ) such that z S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω ; and

    3. for all z F ( T [ k ] ) , J β ( z , T ( z ) ) = J β ( T ( z ) , z ) = 0 , for all β Ω .

  3. Furthermore, let F ( T [ k ] ) , for some k N and ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) is a Hausdorff space. Then,

    1. F ( T [ k ] ) = F ( T ) ;

    2. there is z F ( T ) such that z S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) L Q φ ; Ω ; and

    3. for all z F ( T ) , J β ( z , z ) = 0 , for all β Ω .

Proof

In view of Theorem 3.18, it remains to prove assertions ( a 3 ) and ( b 1 ) ( b 3 ) of the aforementioned theorem.

To prove ( a 3 ) , the contrary, suppose that J β 0 ( z , T z ) > 0 for some β 0 Ω . Using J 1 , assumption ( i i i ) , and inequality (3.14), we can write

J β 0 ( z , T z ) φ β 0 ( z , T z ) { J β 0 ( z , z m + 1 ) + J β 0 ( z m + 1 , T z ) } = φ β 0 ( z , T z ) { J β 0 ( z , z m + 1 ) + J β 0 ( T z m , T z ) } φ β 0 ( z , T z ) { J β 0 ( z , z m + 1 ) + a β 0 J β 0 ( z m , z ) + b β 0 J β 0 ( z m , T z m ) + c β 0 J β 0 ( z , T z ) + e β 0 J β 0 ( z m , T z ) + L β 0 J β 0 ( z , T z m ) } φ β 0 ( z , T z ) { J β 0 ( z , z m + 1 ) + a β 0 J β 0 ( z m , z ) + b β 0 J β 0 ( z m , z m + 1 ) + c β 0 J β 0 ( z , T z ) + e β 0 φ β 0 ( z m , T z ) { J β 0 ( z m , z ) + J β 0 ( z , T z ) } + L β 0 J β 0 ( z , z m + 1 ) } .

Letting m , since lim m , n φ β ( z m , z n ) μ β < 1 , for some μ β < 1 and for each z m , z n U , φ β ( z m , z n ) is finite, and thus, we obtain

J β 0 ( z , T z ) φ β 0 ( z , T z ) { c β 0 + e β 0 lim m φ β 0 ( z m , T z ) } J β 0 ( z , T z ) .

Now, since φ β ( z , T z ) { c β + e β lim m φ β ( z m , T z ) } < 1 , we obtain

J β 0 ( z , T z ) φ β 0 ( z , T z ) { c β 0 + e β 0 lim m φ β 0 ( z m , T z ) } J β 0 ( z , T z ) < J β 0 ( z , T z ) ,

which is impossible. Thus, J β ( z , T z ) = 0 , for all β Ω .

Next, we prove that J β ( T z , z ) = 0 , for all β Ω .

J β ( T z , z ) φ β ( T z , z ) { J β ( T z , z m + 1 ) + J β ( z m + 1 , z ) } = φ β ( T z , z ) { J β ( T z , T z m ) + J β ( z m + 1 , z ) } φ β ( T z , z ) { a β J β ( z , z m ) + b β J β ( z , T z ) + c β J β ( z m , T z m ) + e β J β ( z , T z m ) + L β J β ( z m , T z ) + J β ( z m + 1 , z ) } φ β ( T z , z ) { a β J β ( z , z m ) + b β J β ( z , T z ) + c β J β ( z m , z m + 1 ) + e β J β ( z , z m + 1 ) + L β φ β ( z m , T z ) { J β ( z m , z ) + J β ( z , T z ) } + J β ( z m + 1 , z ) } .

Letting m , since lim m , n φ β ( z m , z n ) μ β < 1 , for some μ β < 1 and for each z m , z n U , φ β ( z m , z n ) is finite, and thus, we have

J β ( T z , z ) φ β ( T z , z ) { b β + L β lim m φ β ( z m , T z ) } J β ( z , T z ) for all β Ω .

Also, since we have proved that J β ( z , T z ) = 0 for all β Ω , we obtain J β ( T z , z ) = 0 for all β Ω . Hence, assertion ( a 3 ) holds.

(III) Since ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) is a Hausdorff space, using Proposition (3.11), assertion ( a 3 ) suggests that for z F ( T [ k ] ) , we have z = T ( z ) . This gives z F ( T ) . Hence, ( b 1 ) is true.

Assertions ( a 2 ) and ( b 1 ) imply ( b 2 ) .

To prove assertion ( b 3 ) , consider ( J 1 ) and use ( a 3 ) and ( b 1 ) , we have for all z F ( T ) = F ( T [ k ] ) and for all β Ω

J β ( z , z ) φ ( z , z ) { J β ( z , T ( z ) ) + J β ( T ( z ) , z ) } = 0 .

Example 3.20

Suppose that U = [ 0 , 5 ] and Q φ ; Ω = { q } , where q : U × U R + is an extended pseudo- b -metric on U given by

(3.15) q ( e , f ) = e f 2 , for all  e , f U ,

and φ : U × U [ 1 , ) is defined by

φ ( e , f ) = e + f + 2 .

Suppose F = 1 8 , 1 U and let J : U × U [ 0 , ) for all e , f U be defined as

(3.16) J ( e , f ) = q ( e , f ) , if  F { e , f } = { e , f } , 4 , if  F { e , f } { e , f } ,

where φ ( e , f ) = e + f + 2 .

Let the graph G = ( V , E ) be such that V = U and

E = { ( e , f ) : e f } { ( e , e ) : e U } .

The single-valued map T is defined by

(3.17) T ( e ) = e + 1 5 , for all  e U .

  • (I.1) ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) is an extended b -gauge space (Example 3.2), which is also Hausdorff.

  • (I.2) The family J φ ; Ω = { J } is an extended J φ ; Ω -family on U (Example 3.9).

  • (I.3) ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) is extended J φ ; Ω -sequential complete.

For this, let { v m : m N } is an extended J φ ; Ω -Cauchy sequence. We may suppose, without losing generality that for all 0 < ε 1 < 1 64 there exists k 0 N such that for all n m k 0 where n , m N , we have

(3.18) J ( v m , v n ) < ε 1 < 1 64 .

Then, using (3.16, (3.15), and (3.18), for all 0 < ε 1 < 1 64 , there exists k 0 N such that for all n m k 0 , where n , m N , we obtain

(3.19) J ( v m , v n ) = q ( v m , v n ) = v m v n 2 < ε 1 < 1 64 .

(3.20) v m F = 1 8 , 1 .

Rewriting (3.19), for all 0 < ε < 1 8 , there exists k 0 N such that for all n m k 0 , where n , m N , we have

v m v n < ε < 1 8 , where ε = ε 1 .

Now, since ( R , . ) is complete, F = 1 8 , 1 is closed in R , also by (3.20), { v m F = 1 8 , 1 } for all m N , m k 0 and { v m : m N } is Cauchy with respect to . , so there is v F such that for all 0 < ε < 1 8 , there exists k 1 N such that for all m k 1 where m N , we have

v v m < ε .

Hence, { v m : m N } is extended J φ ; Ω -convergent to v .

This implies ( U , Q ) is extended J φ ; Ω -sequential complete.

  • (I.4) Next, we show that T satisfies Condition (3.10).

It is obvious that Condition (3.10) holds for a = 1 5 and b = c = e = L = 0 .
  • (I.5) Assumptions ( i ) , ( i i ) , and ( i i i ) of Theorem 3.19 holds.

For z 0 = 0 and z 1 = T z 0 = 1 5 , we have ( z 0 , T z 0 ) E . Also for ( u , v ) E we have ( T u , T v ) E , since T is nondecreasing. Furthermore, if a sequence ( z m : m N ) in U is such that ( z m , z m + 1 ) E and lim m J φ ; Ω z m = z , then ( z m , z ) E and ( z , z m ) E .
  • (I.6) Finally, we show that T is an extended Q φ ; Ω -closed map on U .

For this let ( z m : m N ) be a sequence in T ( x ) = [ 1 5 , 6 5 ] which is extended Q φ ; Ω -convergent to each point of S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω . Let ( v m : m N ) and ( u m : m N ) be its subsequences satisfying v m = T ( u m ) for all m N .

Let z S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω , then for all ε 1 > 0 , there exists k N such that for all m k , where m N , we have

q ( z , z m ) < ε 1 .

As a result, for all ε > 0 , there exists k N such that for all m k , where m N , we have

[ q ( z , z m ) = z z m < ε ] [ q ( z , u m ) = z u m < ε ] [ q ( z , v m ) = z v m < ε ] [ v m = T ( u m ) ] ,

where ε = ε 1 .

We can also write, for all 0 < ε < 1 8 , there exists k N such that for all m k , where m N , we have

[ z z m < ε ] [ z u m < ε ] [ z v m < ε ] [ v m = T ( u m ) ] .

This, in particular, implies that for all 0 < ε < 1 8 , there exists k N such that for all m k , where m N , we have

z u m = z 5 v m + 1 = 5 z 4 z 5 v m + 1 = 4 1 4 z 5 ( v m z ) < ε ,

and we obtain

4 1 4 z < ε + 5 v m z .

Now, since z v m 0 , when m , we have 1 4 z < ε 2 where ε 2 = ε 4 < 1 32 . This gives S ( z m : m N ) Q φ ; Ω = { 1 4 } , and there exists z = 1 4 S ( z m : m N ) Q φ ; Ω such that 1 4 = T ( 1 4 ) .

Hence, T is an extended Q φ ; Ω -closed map on U .

  • (I.7) As all the suppositions of Theorem 3.19 hold, we obtain

    F ( T ) = 1 4 ,

    lim m Q φ ; Ω z m = 1 4 ,

    J 1 4 , 1 4 = 0 .

Before moving ahead to the next results, we first define the family Ψ φ of mappings ψ : [ 0 , ) [ 0 , ) that are non-decreasing and satisfying the following conditions:

  • (i) ψ ( 0 ) = 0 ;

  • (ii) ψ ( η t ) = η ψ ( t ) < η t , for each η , t > 0 , 

  • (iii) i = 1 r i ψ i ( t ) m = 1 i φ ( z m , z n ) < ,

  • where r 1 .

Theorem 3.21

Let the set-valued map T : U C l J φ ; Ω ( U ) and φ β : U × U [ 1 , ) for each β Ω and ( u , v ) E satisfy

(3.21) D β J φ ; Ω ( T u , T v ) ψ β ( J β ( u , v ) ) ,

where ψ β Ψ φ .

Moreover, let

  1. there are z 0 U and z 1 T z 0 such that ( z 0 , z 1 ) E ;

  2. if ( u , v ) E and x T u and y T v such that 1 r β J β ( x , y ) < J β ( u , v ) , for all β Ω , where { r β : r β > 1 } β Ω , then ( x , y ) E ;

  3. for each { r β : r β > 1 } β Ω and x U , there exists y T x such that

    J β ( x , y ) r β J β ( x , T x ) , for a l l β Ω .

Then, the following assertions hold:
  1. For each z 0 U , ( z m : m { 0 } N ) is an extended Q φ ; Ω -convergent sequence in U; thus, S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω .

  2. Moreover, suppose that T [ k ] is an extended Q φ ; Ω -closed map on U, for some k N . Then,

    1. F ( T [ k ] ) ;

    2. there exists z F ( T [ k ] ) such that z S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω .

Proof

(I) Using supposition ( i ) , there is z 0 U and z 1 T z 0 such that ( z 0 , z 1 ) E . Now for each β Ω , applying (3.21) we have

(3.22) J β ( z 1 , T z 1 ) D β J φ ; Ω ( T z 0 , T z 1 ) ψ β ( J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) ) .

Now, using assumption ( i i i ) , for z 1 U , there is z 2 T z 1 such that

(3.23) J β ( z 1 , z 2 ) r β J β ( z 1 , T z 1 ) r β ψ β ( J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) ) , for all β Ω .

Applying ψ β , we obtain

ψ ( J β ( z 1 , z 2 ) ) ψ r β ψ β ( J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) ) = r β ψ β 2 ( J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) ) , for all β Ω .

Using assumption ( i i ) , from (3.23), it follows that ( z 1 , z 2 ) E . Now again for each β Ω , using (3.21), we can write

J β ( z 2 , T z 2 ) D β J φ ; Ω ( T z 1 , T z 2 ) ψ β ( J β ( z 1 , z 2 ) ) .

Using assumption ( i i i ) , for z 2 U , there exists z 3 T z 2 such that

J β ( z 2 , z 3 ) r β J β ( z 2 , T z 2 ) r β ψ β ( J β ( z 1 , z 2 ) ) r β 2 ψ β 2 ( J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) ) , for all β Ω .

It is obvious that ( z 2 , z 3 ) E . Proceeding in the similar fashion, we find a sequence ( z m : m { 0 } N ) such that ( z m , z m + 1 ) E and

(3.24) J β ( z m , z m + 1 ) r β m ψ β m ( J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) ) , for all β Ω .

Now, by the repeated use of ( J 1 ) and (3.24) for all β Ω and for all n > m , where m , n N , we obtain

J β ( z m , z n ) φ β ( z m , z n ) r β m ψ β m ( J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) ) + φ β ( z m , z n ) φ β ( z m + 1 , z n ) r β m + 1 ψ β m + 1 ( J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) ) + φ β ( z m , z n ) φ β ( z m + 1 , z n ) φ β ( z m + 2 , z n ) r β m + 2 ψ β m + 2 ( J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) ) + + φ β ( z m , z n ) φ β ( z m + 1 , z n ) φ β ( z n 1 , z n ) r β n 1 ψ β n 1 ( J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) ) φ β ( z 1 , z n ) φ β ( z 2 , z n ) φ β ( z m , z n ) r β m ψ β m ( J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) ) + φ β ( z 1 , z n ) φ β ( z 2 , z n ) φ β ( z m , z n ) φ β ( z m + 1 , z n ) r β m + 1 ψ β m + 1 ( J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) ) + + φ β ( z 1 , z n ) φ β ( z 2 , z n ) φ β ( z m , z n ) φ β ( z n 1 , z n ) r β n 1 ψ β n 1 ( J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) ) .

Let S m = j = 1 m r β j ψ β j ( J β ( z 0 , z 1 ) ) i = 1 j φ β ( z i , z n ) , and we can write

J β ( z m , z n ) ( S n 1 S m ) .

Since S m < , we can write

(3.25) lim m sup n > m J β ( z m , z n ) = 0 , for all β Ω .

Now, consider the proof of Theorem 3.18 and follow the steps ahead from inequality (3.12), we can easily complete the proof of this theorem.□

Let us consider T : U U , and we obtain the result given below for a single-valued mapping.

Theorem 3.22

Let the map T : U U and φ β : U × U [ 1 , ) for each β Ω satisfy

(3.26) J β ( T u , T v ) ψ β ( J β ( u , v ) ) , for a l l ( u , v ) E ,

where ψ β Ψ φ .

Moreover, let

  1. there exists z 0 U such that ( z 0 , T z 0 ) E ;

  2. for ( u , v ) E we have ( T u , T v ) E , provided J β ( T u , T v ) J β ( u , v ) , for all β Ω ;

  3. if a sequence ( z m : m N ) in U is such that ( z m , z m + 1 ) E and lim m J φ ; Ω z m = z , then ( z m , z ) E and ( z , z m ) E .

Then, the following statements are satisfied:
  1. For any z 0 U , ( z m : m { 0 } N ) is an extended Q φ ; Ω -convergent sequence in U, thus, S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω .

  2. Moreover, suppose that T [ k ] is an extended Q φ ; Ω -closed map on U, for some k N . Then,

    1. F ( T [ k ] ) ;

    2. there exists z F ( T [ k ] ) such that z S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω ; and

    3. for all z F ( T [ k ] ) , J β ( z , T ( z ) ) = J β ( T ( z ) , z ) = 0 , for all β Ω .

  3. Furthermore, let F ( T [ k ] ) for some k N and ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) is a Hausdorff space. Then,

    1. F ( T [ k ] ) = F ( T ) ;

    2. there exists z F ( T ) such that z S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) L Q φ ; Ω ; and

    3. for all z F ( T [ k ] ) = F ( T ) , J β ( z , z ) = 0 , for all β Ω .

Proof

Since every single-valued mapping can be viewed as a multi-valued mapping, it remains to prove assertion ( c 3 ) and assertions ( d 1 ) ( d 3 ) of the aforementioned theorem.

To prove ( c 3 ) , use J 1 , assumption ( i i i ) and inequality (3.26), we obtain for all β Ω ,

J β ( z , T z ) φ β ( z , T z ) { J β ( z , z m + 1 ) + J β ( z m + 1 , T z ) } φ β ( z , T z ) { J β ( z , z m + 1 ) + J β ( T z m , T z ) } φ β ( z , T z ) { J β ( z , z m + 1 ) + ψ β ( J β ( z m , z ) ) } .

Letting m , we have

J β ( z , T z ) = 0 , for all β Ω .

Similarly, we can show that J β ( T z , z ) = 0 β Ω .

(III) Since ( U , Q φ ; Ω ) is a Hausdorff space, using Proposition (3.11), assertion ( c 3 ) suggests that for z F ( T [ k ] ) , we have z T ( z ) . This gives z F ( T ) . Hence, ( d 1 ) is true.

Assertions ( c 2 ) and ( d 1 ) imply ( d 2 ) .

To prove assertion ( d 3 ) , consider ( J 1 ) and use ( c 3 ) and ( d 1 ) ; we have for all z F ( T [ k ] ) = F ( T ) ,

J β ( z , z ) φ ( z , z ) { J β ( z , T ( z ) ) + J β ( T ( z ) , z ) } = 0 ,  for all β Ω .□

Remark 3.23

  1. Our results are novel generalization of the results in [32], which requires the completeness of the space. Our results provide strong assertions with weak assumptions.

  2. Our results extend and improve the results in [32] as they give information about the periodic points as well.

4 Consequences

This section consists of important and fascinating consequences of the theorems proved in the previous section.

We set up some periodic and fixed point results for mappings fulfilling contraction inequalities involving function α .

Recall that U is a non-void set and the graph G ( V , E ) is defined as

V U and E { ( a , b ) U × U : α ( a , b ) 1 } ,

where α : U × U [ 0 , ) .

Corollary 4.1

Let the map T : U C l J φ ; Ω ( U ) and φ β : U × U [ 1 , ) for each β Ω satisfy

(4.1) D β J φ ; Ω ( T u , T v ) a β J β ( u , v ) + b β J β ( u , T u ) + c β J β ( v , T v ) + e β J β ( u , T v ) + L β J β ( v , T u ) ,

for all α ( u , v ) 1 , where a β , b β , c β , e β , L β 0 is such that a β + b β + c β + 2 e β φ β ( z m 1 , T z m ) < 1 and lim m , n φ β ( z m , z n ) μ β < 1 , for some μ β < 1 and each z 0 U , here, z m T ( z m 1 ) , where m N .

Moreover, let

  1. there exists z 0 U and z 1 T z 0 such that α ( z 0 , z 1 ) 1 ;

  2. if α ( u , v ) 1 and x T u and y T v such that J β ( x , y ) J β ( u , v ) , for all β Ω , then α ( x , y ) 1 ;

  3. for any { r β : r β > 1 } β Ω and u U , there exists v T u such that

    J β ( u , v ) r β J β ( u , T u ) , for a l l β Ω .

Then, the following assertions hold:
  1. For any z 0 U , ( z m : m { 0 } N ) is an extended Q φ ; Ω -convergent sequence in U; thus, S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω .

  2. Moreover, suppose that T [ k ] is an extended Q φ ; Ω -closed map on U, for some k N . Then,

    1. F ( T [ k ] ) ;

    2. There exists z F ( T [ k ] ) such that z S ( z m : m { 0 } N ) Q φ ; Ω .

Proof

Consider the graph G = ( V , E ) and define the map α : U × U [ 0 , ) for some ρ 1 as:

(4.2) α ( u , v ) = ρ , if  ( u , v ) E , 0 , otherwise .

Hence, inequality (4.1) can be written as

(4.3) D β J φ ; Ω ( T u , T v ) a β J β ( u , v ) + b β J β ( u , T u ) + c β J β ( v , T v ) + e β J β ( u , T v ) + L β J β ( v , T u ) ,

for all ( u , v ) E . This yields that T satisfies inequality (3.6). Also conditions ( a ) , ( b ) , and (c) imply conditions (i), (ii), and (iii) of Theorem 3.18. The proof now follows from Theorem 3.18.□

Remark 4.2

  1. Following the pattern of statement and proof of Corollary 4.1, we can state and prove the corollaries for Theorems 3.19, 3.21 and 3.22 in the same manner.

  2. The results in an extended b -gauge space are novel generalizations and improved versions of the results in [33], in which assumptions are weak and assertions are strong.

  3. Observed that in case, α greater than or equal to one is used in any contraction inequality, bringing it back to the regular contractive inequality without α (see for instance inequality (4.3)). Therefore, it seems that α -function plays no role in proving that a mapping has a fixed point. Hence, when the underlying space is enriched with the graph, the fixed-point theorems involving function α can easily be obtained.

  4. Since we have stated a few theorems for contraction inequalities involving function α , some more analogues of the aforementioned results for contraction inequalities involving function α can simply be derived from results in [6,7,39].


,

Acknowledgements

De La Sen is thankful to the Basque Government for Grant IT1555-22 and to MI-CIU/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and ERDF/E for Grants PID2021-123543OB-C21 and PID2021-123543OB-C22. Samreen and Savas are grateful for the support of Turkish Academy of Science.

  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and consented to its submission to the journal, reviewed all the results, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] S. Banach, Sur les operations dans les ensembles abstraits et leurs applications aux equations integrales, Fundam. Math. 3 (1922), 133–181. 10.4064/fm-3-1-133-181Search in Google Scholar

[2] G. E. Hardy and T. D. Rogers, A generalization of a fixed point theorem of Reich, Can. Math. Bull. 16 (1973), no. 2, 201–206. 10.4153/CMB-1973-036-0Search in Google Scholar

[3] Z. Mustafa, V. Parvaneh, M. M. Jaradat, and Z. Kadelburg, Extended rectangular b-metric spaces and some fixed point theorems for contractive mappings, Symmetry 11 (2019), no. 4, 594, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11040594. 10.3390/sym11040594Search in Google Scholar

[4] A. U. Khan, M. Samreen, A. Hussain, and H. A. Sulami, Best proximity point results for multi-valued mappings in generalized metric, Symmetry 16 (2024), no. 4, 502, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16040502. 10.3390/sym16040502Search in Google Scholar

[5] J. Jachymski, The contraction principle for mappings on a metric space with a graph, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 136 (2008), no. 4, 1359–1373. 10.1090/S0002-9939-07-09110-1Search in Google Scholar

[6] M. Samreen and T. Kamran, Fixed point theorems for integral G-contractions, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013 (2013), no. 1, 149. Search in Google Scholar

[7] T. Kamran, M. Samreen, and N. Shahzad, Probabilistic G-contractions, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013 (2013), no. 1, 223.10.1186/1687-1812-2013-223Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Samreen, T. Kamran, and N. Shahzad, Some fixed point theorems in b-metric space endowed with graph, Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013 (2013), no. 1, 967132, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/967132. 10.1186/1687-1812-2013-149Search in Google Scholar

[9] J. Tiammee and S. Suantai, Coincidence point theorems for graph-preserving multi-valued mappings, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2014 (2014), no. 1, 70.10.1186/1687-1812-2014-70Search in Google Scholar

[10] A. Nicolae, D. O. Regan, and A. Petrusel, Fixed point theorems for single-valued and multivalued generalized contractions in metric spaces endowed with a graph, Georgian Math. J. 18 (2011), 307–327. 10.1515/gmj.2011.0019Search in Google Scholar

[11] F. Bojor, Fixed points of Kannan mappings in metric spaces endowed with a graph, An. St. Univ. Ovidius Constanta Ser. Mat. 20 (2012), no. 1, 31–40. 10.2478/v10309-012-0003-xSearch in Google Scholar

[12] J. H. Asl, B. Mohammadi, S. Rezapour, and S. M. Vaezpour, Some fixed point results for generalized quasi-contractive multifunctions on graphs, Filomat 27 (2013), no. 2, 311–315. 10.2298/FIL1302311ASearch in Google Scholar

[13] A. Ahmad, M. Younis, and A. A. N. Abdou, Bipolar b-Metric spaces in graph setting and related fixed points, Symmetry 15 (2023), no. 6, 1227, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15061227. 10.3390/sym15061227Search in Google Scholar

[14] A. Petrusel and G. Petrusel, Graphical contractions and common fixed point in b-metric space, Arab. J. Math. 12 (2023), 423–430. 10.1007/s40065-022-00396-8Search in Google Scholar

[15] J. A. Jiddah, M. Alansari, O. K. S. K. Mohammad, M. S. Shagari, and A. A. Bakery, Fixed point results on a new family of contractions in metric space endowed with a graph, J. Math. 2023 (2023), no. 1, 2534432, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2534432. 10.1155/2023/2534432Search in Google Scholar

[16] J. Dugundji, Topology, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1966. Search in Google Scholar

[17] R. P. Agarwal, Y. J. Cho, and D. O. Regan, Homotopy invariant results on complete gauge spaces, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 67 (2003), 241–248. 10.1017/S0004972700033700Search in Google Scholar

[18] M. Frigon, Fixed point results for generalized contractions in gauge spaces and applications, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 128 (2000), 2957–2965. 10.1090/S0002-9939-00-05838-XSearch in Google Scholar

[19] C. Chifu and G. Petrusel, Fixed point results for generalized contractions on ordered gauge spaces with applications, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011 (2011), 10. 10.1155/2011/979586Search in Google Scholar

[20] A. Chis and R. Precup, Continuation theory for general contractions in gauge spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 3 (2004), 173–185. 10.1155/S1687182004403027Search in Google Scholar

[21] M. Cherichi, B. Samet, and C. Vetro, Fixed point theorems in complete gauge spaces and applications to second order nonlinear initial value problems, J. Funct. Space Appl. 2013 (2013), no. 1, 293101. 10.1155/2013/293101Search in Google Scholar

[22] M. Cherichi and B. Samet, Fixed point theorems on ordered gauge spaces with applications to nonlinear integral equations, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012 (2012), no. 1, 13. 10.1186/1687-1812-2012-13Search in Google Scholar

[23] T. Lazar and G. Petrusel, Fixed points for non-self operators in gauge spaces, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 6 (2013), no. 1, 29–34, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22436/jnsa.006.01.05. 10.22436/jnsa.006.01.05Search in Google Scholar

[24] K. Wlodarczyk and R. Plebaniak, New completeness and periodic points of discontinuous contractions of Banach-type in quasi-gauge spaces without Hausdorff property, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013 (2013), no. 1, 289. 10.1186/1687-1812-2013-289Search in Google Scholar

[25] R. Plebaniak, New generalized pseudodistance and coincidence point theorem in a b-metric space, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013 (2013), no. 1, 270. 10.1186/1687-1812-2013-270Search in Google Scholar

[26] R. Plebaniak, On best proximity points for set-valued contractions of Nadler type with respect to b-generalized pseudodistances in b-metric spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2014 (2014), no. 1, 39. 10.1186/1687-1812-2014-39Search in Google Scholar

[27] K. Wlodarczyk, Set-valued Leader type contractions, periodic point and endpoint theorems, quasi-triangular spaces, Bellman and Volterra equations, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2020 (2020), no. 1, 6. 10.1186/s13663-020-00673-1Search in Google Scholar

[28] K. Wlodarczyk, Periodic and fixed points of the Leader type contractions in quasi-triangular sapces, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2016 (2016), no. 1, 85. 10.1186/s13663-016-0575-7Search in Google Scholar

[29] K. Wlodarczyk, Quasi-triangular, Pompeiu-Hausdorff quasi-distances, and periodic and fixed point theorems of Bannach and Nadler types, Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2015 (2015), no. 1, 201236, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/201236. 10.1155/2015/201236Search in Google Scholar

[30] K. Wlodarczyk and R. Plebaniak, Quasigauge spaces with generalized quasi pseudodistances and periodic points of dissipative set-valued dynamic system, Fixed Point Theory and Appl. 2011 (2011), no. 1, 712706, Article ID 712706. 10.1155/2011/712706Search in Google Scholar

[31] N. Zikria, M. Samreen, T. Kamran, H. Aydi, and C. Park, Some periodic and fixed point theorems on quasi-b-gauge spaces, J. Inequal. Appl. 2022 (2022), no. 1, 13. 10.1186/s13660-021-02750-4Search in Google Scholar

[32] M. U. Ali, T. Kamran, and M. Postolache, Fixed point theorems for Multivalued G-contractions in Housdorff b-Gauge space, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 8 (2015), 847–855. 10.22436/jnsa.008.05.34Search in Google Scholar

[33] M. U. Ali and F. U. Din, Discussion on α-contractions and related fixed point theorems in Hausdorff b-gauge space, Jordan J. Math. Stat. 10 (2017), no. 3, 247–263. Search in Google Scholar

[34] I. A. Bakhtin, The contraction mapping principle in almost metric spaces, Funct. Anal. 30 (1989), 26–37. Search in Google Scholar

[35] S. Czerwik, Contraction mappings in b-metric spaces, Acta Math. Inform. Univ. Ostrav. 1 (1993), no. 1, 5–11. Search in Google Scholar

[36] T. Kamran, M. Samreen, and Q. U. Ain, A generalization of b-metric space and some fixed point theorems, Mathematics 5 (2017), no. 2, 19, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math5020019. 10.3390/math5020019Search in Google Scholar

[37] N. Zikria, M. Samreen, T. Kamran, and S. S. Yesilkaya, Periodic and fixed points for Caristi type G-contractions in extended b-gauge spaces, J. Funct. Spaces 2021 (2021), no. 1, 1865172, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1865172. 10.1155/2021/1865172Search in Google Scholar

[38] N. Zikria, A. Mukheimer, M. Samreen, T. Kamran, H. Aydi, and K. Abodayeh, Periodic and fixed points for F-type contractions in b-gauge spaces, AIMS Math. 7 (2022), no. 10, 18393–18415, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20221013. 10.3934/math.20221013Search in Google Scholar

[39] M. U. Ali and T. Kamran, On (α*,ψ)-contractive multi-valued mappings, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013 (2013), no. 1, 137. 10.1186/1687-1812-2013-137Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-09-02
Revised: 2024-02-20
Accepted: 2024-04-15
Published Online: 2024-08-30

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. On the p-fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff equations with electromagnetic fields and the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev nonlinearity
  3. L-Fuzzy fixed point results in -metric spaces with applications
  4. Solutions of a coupled system of hybrid boundary value problems with Riesz-Caputo derivative
  5. Nonparametric methods of statistical inference for double-censored data with applications
  6. LADM procedure to find the analytical solutions of the nonlinear fractional dynamics of partial integro-differential equations
  7. Existence of projected solutions for quasi-variational hemivariational inequality
  8. Spectral collocation method for convection-diffusion equation
  9. New local fractional Hermite-Hadamard-type and Ostrowski-type inequalities with generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel for generalized h-preinvex functions
  10. On the asymptotics of eigenvalues for a Sturm-Liouville problem with symmetric single-well potential
  11. On exact rate of convergence of row sequences of multipoint Hermite-Padé approximants
  12. The essential norm of bounded diagonal infinite matrices acting on Banach sequence spaces
  13. Decay rate of the solutions to the Cauchy problem of the Lord Shulman thermoelastic Timoshenko model with distributed delay
  14. Enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of two uniformly convergent numerical solvers for singularly perturbed parabolic convection–diffusion–reaction problems with two small parameters
  15. An inertial shrinking projection self-adaptive algorithm for solving split variational inclusion problems and fixed point problems in Banach spaces
  16. An equation for complex fractional diffusion created by the Struve function with a T-symmetric univalent solution
  17. On the existence and Ulam-Hyers stability for implicit fractional differential equation via fractional integral-type boundary conditions
  18. Some properties of a class of holomorphic functions associated with tangent function
  19. The existence of multiple solutions for a class of upper critical Choquard equation in a bounded domain
  20. On the continuity in q of the family of the limit q-Durrmeyer operators
  21. Results on solutions of several systems of the product type complex partial differential difference equations
  22. On Berezin norm and Berezin number inequalities for sum of operators
  23. Geometric invariants properties of osculating curves under conformal transformation in Euclidean space ℝ3
  24. On a generalization of the Opial inequality
  25. A novel numerical approach to solutions of fractional Bagley-Torvik equation fitted with a fractional integral boundary condition
  26. Holomorphic curves into projective spaces with some special hypersurfaces
  27. On Periodic solutions for implicit nonlinear Caputo tempered fractional differential problems
  28. Approximation of complex q-Beta-Baskakov-Szász-Stancu operators in compact disk
  29. Existence and regularity of solutions for non-autonomous integrodifferential evolution equations involving nonlocal conditions
  30. Jordan left derivations in infinite matrix rings
  31. Nonlinear nonlocal elliptic problems in ℝ3: existence results and qualitative properties
  32. Invariant means and lacunary sequence spaces of order (α, β)
  33. Novel results for two families of multivalued dominated mappings satisfying generalized nonlinear contractive inequalities and applications
  34. Global in time well-posedness of a three-dimensional periodic regularized Boussinesq system
  35. Existence of solutions for nonlinear problems involving mixed fractional derivatives with p(x)-Laplacian operator
  36. Some applications and maximum principles for multi-term time-space fractional parabolic Monge-Ampère equation
  37. On three-dimensional q-Riordan arrays
  38. Some aspects of normal curve on smooth surface under isometry
  39. Mittag-Leffler-Hyers-Ulam stability for a first- and second-order nonlinear differential equations using Fourier transform
  40. Topological structure of the solution sets to non-autonomous evolution inclusions driven by measures on the half-line
  41. Remark on the Daugavet property for complex Banach spaces
  42. Decreasing and complete monotonicity of functions defined by derivatives of completely monotonic function involving trigamma function
  43. Uniqueness of meromorphic functions concerning small functions and derivatives-differences
  44. Asymptotic approximations of Apostol-Frobenius-Euler polynomials of order α in terms of hyperbolic functions
  45. Hyers-Ulam stability of Davison functional equation on restricted domains
  46. Involvement of three successive fractional derivatives in a system of pantograph equations and studying the existence solution and MLU stability
  47. Composition of some positive linear integral operators
  48. On bivariate fractal interpolation for countable data and associated nonlinear fractal operator
  49. Generalized result on the global existence of positive solutions for a parabolic reaction-diffusion model with an m × m diffusion matrix
  50. Online makespan minimization for MapReduce scheduling on multiple parallel machines
  51. The sequential Henstock-Kurzweil delta integral on time scales
  52. On a discrete version of Fejér inequality for α-convex sequences without symmetry condition
  53. Existence of three solutions for two quasilinear Laplacian systems on graphs
  54. Embeddings of anisotropic Sobolev spaces into spaces of anisotropic Hölder-continuous functions
  55. Nilpotent perturbations of m-isometric and m-symmetric tensor products of commuting d-tuples of operators
  56. Characterizations of transcendental entire solutions of trinomial partial differential-difference equations in ℂ2#
  57. Fractional Sturm-Liouville operators on compact star graphs
  58. Exact controllability for nonlinear thermoviscoelastic plate problem
  59. Improved modified gradient-based iterative algorithm and its relaxed version for the complex conjugate and transpose Sylvester matrix equations
  60. Superposition operator problems of Hölder-Lipschitz spaces
  61. A note on λ-analogue of Lah numbers and λ-analogue of r-Lah numbers
  62. Ground state solutions and multiple positive solutions for nonhomogeneous Kirchhoff equation with Berestycki-Lions type conditions
  63. A note on 1-semi-greedy bases in p-Banach spaces with 0 < p ≤ 1
  64. Fixed point results for generalized convex orbital Lipschitz operators
  65. Asymptotic model for the propagation of surface waves on a rotating magnetoelastic half-space
  66. Multiplicity of k-convex solutions for a singular k-Hessian system
  67. Poisson C*-algebra derivations in Poisson C*-algebras
  68. Signal recovery and polynomiographic visualization of modified Noor iteration of operators with property (E)
  69. Approximations to precisely localized supports of solutions for non-linear parabolic p-Laplacian problems
  70. Solving nonlinear fractional differential equations by common fixed point results for a pair of (α, Θ)-type contractions in metric spaces
  71. Pseudo compact almost automorphic solutions to a family of delay differential equations
  72. Periodic measures of fractional stochastic discrete wave equations with nonlinear noise
  73. Asymptotic study of a nonlinear elliptic boundary Steklov problem on a nanostructure
  74. Cramer's rule for a class of coupled Sylvester commutative quaternion matrix equations
  75. Quantitative estimates for perturbed sampling Kantorovich operators in Orlicz spaces
  76. Review Articles
  77. Penalty method for unilateral contact problem with Coulomb's friction in time-fractional derivatives
  78. Differential sandwich theorems for p-valent analytic functions associated with a generalization of the integral operator
  79. Special Issue on Development of Fuzzy Sets and Their Extensions - Part II
  80. Higher-order circular intuitionistic fuzzy time series forecasting methodology: Application of stock change index
  81. Binary relations applied to the fuzzy substructures of quantales under rough environment
  82. Algorithm selection model based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision in big data information mining
  83. A new machine learning approach based on spatial fuzzy data correlation for recognizing sports activities
  84. Benchmarking the efficiency of distribution warehouses using a four-phase integrated PCA-DEA-improved fuzzy SWARA-CoCoSo model for sustainable distribution
  85. Special Issue on Application of Fractional Calculus: Mathematical Modeling and Control - Part II
  86. A study on a type of degenerate poly-Dedekind sums
  87. Efficient scheme for a category of variable-order optimal control problems based on the sixth-kind Chebyshev polynomials
  88. Special Issue on Mathematics for Artificial intelligence and Artificial intelligence for Mathematics
  89. Toward automated hail disaster weather recognition based on spatio-temporal sequence of radar images
  90. The shortest-path and bee colony optimization algorithms for traffic control at single intersection with NetworkX application
  91. Neural network quaternion-based controller for port-Hamiltonian system
  92. Matching ontologies with kernel principle component analysis and evolutionary algorithm
  93. Survey on machine vision-based intelligent water quality monitoring techniques in water treatment plant: Fish activity behavior recognition-based schemes and applications
  94. Artificial intelligence-driven tone recognition of Guzheng: A linear prediction approach
  95. Transformer learning-based neural network algorithms for identification and detection of electronic bullying in social media
  96. Squirrel search algorithm-support vector machine: Assessing civil engineering budgeting course using an SSA-optimized SVM model
  97. Special Issue on International E-Conference on Mathematical and Statistical Sciences - Part I
  98. Some fixed point results on ultrametric spaces endowed with a graph
  99. On the generalized Mellin integral operators
  100. On existence and multiplicity of solutions for a biharmonic problem with weights via Ricceri's theorem
  101. Approximation process of a positive linear operator of hypergeometric type
  102. On Kantorovich variant of Brass-Stancu operators
  103. A higher-dimensional categorical perspective on 2-crossed modules
  104. Special Issue on Some Integral Inequalities, Integral Equations, and Applications - Part I
  105. On parameterized inequalities for fractional multiplicative integrals
  106. On inverse source term for heat equation with memory term
  107. On Fejér-type inequalities for generalized trigonometrically and hyperbolic k-convex functions
  108. New extensions related to Fejér-type inequalities for GA-convex functions
  109. Derivation of Hermite-Hadamard-Jensen-Mercer conticrete inequalities for Atangana-Baleanu fractional integrals by means of majorization
  110. Some Hardy's inequalities on conformable fractional calculus
  111. The novel quadratic phase Fourier S-transform and associated uncertainty principles in the quaternion setting
  112. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Fixed-Point Theory and Applications - Part I
  113. A novel iterative process for numerical reckoning of fixed points via generalized nonlinear mappings with qualitative study
  114. Some new fixed point theorems of α-partially nonexpansive mappings
  115. Generalized Yosida inclusion problem involving multi-valued operator with XOR operation
  116. Periodic and fixed points for mappings in extended b-gauge spaces equipped with a graph
  117. Convergence of Peaceman-Rachford splitting method with Bregman distance for three-block nonconvex nonseparable optimization
  118. Topological structure of the solution sets to neutral evolution inclusions driven by measures
  119. (α, F)-Geraghty-type generalized F-contractions on non-Archimedean fuzzy metric-unlike spaces
  120. Solvability of infinite system of integral equations of Hammerstein type in three variables in tempering sequence spaces c 0 β and 1 β
  121. Special Issue on Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Their Applications - Part I
  122. Fuzzy fractional delay integro-differential equation with the generalized Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative
  123. Klein-Gordon potential in characteristic coordinates
  124. Asymptotic analysis of Leray solution for the incompressible NSE with damping
  125. Special Issue on Blow-up Phenomena in Nonlinear Equations of Mathematical Physics - Part I
  126. Long time decay of incompressible convective Brinkman-Forchheimer in L2(ℝ3)
  127. Numerical solution of general order Emden-Fowler-type Pantograph delay differential equations
  128. Global smooth solution to the n-dimensional liquid crystal equations with fractional dissipation
  129. Spectral properties for a system of Dirac equations with nonlinear dependence on the spectral parameter
  130. A memory-type thermoelastic laminated beam with structural damping and microtemperature effects: Well-posedness and general decay
  131. The asymptotic behavior for the Navier-Stokes-Voigt-Brinkman-Forchheimer equations with memory and Tresca friction in a thin domain
  132. Absence of global solutions to wave equations with structural damping and nonlinear memory
  133. Special Issue on Differential Equations and Numerical Analysis - Part I
  134. Vanishing viscosity limit for a one-dimensional viscous conservation law in the presence of two noninteracting shocks
  135. Limiting dynamics for stochastic complex Ginzburg-Landau systems with time-varying delays on unbounded thin domains
  136. A comparison of two nonconforming finite element methods for linear three-field poroelasticity
Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dema-2024-0016/html
Scroll to top button