Home Some properties of a class of holomorphic functions associated with tangent function
Article Open Access

Some properties of a class of holomorphic functions associated with tangent function

  • Muhammad Ghaffar Khan , Wali Khan Mashwani , Zabidin Salleh EMAIL logo , Fairouz Tchier , Bilal Khan and Sarfraz Nawaz Malik
Published/Copyright: April 12, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this study, we define new class of holomorphic functions associated with tangent function. Furthermore, we examine the differential subordination implementation results related to Janowski and tangent functions. Also, we investigate some extreme point theorem and partial sums results, necessary and sufficient conditions, convex combination, closure theorem, growth and distortion bounds, and radii of close-to-starlikeness and starlikeness for this newly defined functions class of holomorphic functions.

1 Introduction

We denote by A the class of all analytic functions h defined in Ω , where

Ω = { ξ : ξ C and ξ < 1 } ,

and with the usual normalization:

h ( 0 ) = 0 and h ( 0 ) = 1 .

Thus, each h A has the following Taylor series expansion:

(1.1) h ( ξ ) = ξ + n = 2 a n ξ n , ξ Ω .

Also, let S denotes a subfamily of A , whose members are univalent in the open unit disk Ω .

Moreover, for two functions h 1 , h 2 A , the expression h 1 h 2 denotes that the function h 1 is subordinate to the function h 2 if there exists the holomorphic function μ having properties of the holomorphic function, i.e.,

μ ( ξ ) ξ and μ ( 0 ) = 0

such that

h 1 ( ξ ) = h 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) , ξ Ω .

Also, if h 2 S , then the aforementioned conditions can be expressed as follows:

h 1 h 2 h 1 ( 0 ) = h 2 ( 0 ) and h 1 ( Ω ) h 2 ( Ω ) .

In 1992, Ma and Minda defined [1]

(1.2) S ( ϕ ) = h A : ξ h ( ξ ) h ( ξ ) ϕ ( ξ ) ,

with ( ϕ ) > 0 in Ω ; additionally, the function ϕ maps Ω onto a star-shaped region and the image domain is symmetric about the real axis and starlike with respect to ϕ ( 0 ) = 1 with ϕ ( 0 ) > 0 . The set S ( ϕ ) generalizes a number of subfamilies of the function class A , including, for instance:

  1. If

    ϕ ( ξ ) = 1 + L ξ 1 + M ξ ,

    with 1 M < L 1 , then

    S [ L , M ] S 1 + L ξ 1 + M ξ ,

    where S [ L , M ] is the class of Janowski starlike functions, [2].

  2. For the function

    ϕ ( ξ ) = 1 + sinh 1 ξ ,

    we obtain the class S ρ , introduced by Kumar and Arora [3].

  3. If we take

    ϕ ( ξ ) = 1 + tanh ξ ,

    the class becomes S tanh , which is introduced by Ullah et al. [4].

  4. If ϕ ( ξ ) = e ξ , then the class S ( ϕ ) becomes S e , which is defined and studied by Mendiratta [5].

  5. For ϕ ( ξ ) = 1 + sin ( ξ ) , the class S ( ϕ ) reduces to the class S sin . The family S s introduced by Cho et al. [6] is defined as:

    (1.3) S sin = h A : ξ h ( ξ ) h ( ξ ) 1 + sin ξ , ( ξ Ω ) ,

    which means that ξ h ( ξ ) h ( ξ ) lies in an eight-shaped region.

  6. The class C sin of convex functions related to sine function is introduced by Zulfiqar et al. [7] as:

    (1.4) C sin = h A : ( ξ h ( ξ ) ) h ( ξ ) 1 + sin ξ , ξ Ω .

The natural extensions of differential inequalities on the real line in the complex plane are known as differential subordinations. Derivative knowledge is essential for understanding the properties of real-valued functions. Several differential implications may be found in the complex plane, when a function is described by means of differential conditions. The univalency criteria for analytical functions are provided by the Noshiro-Warschawski theorem, an example of such differential implication. The range of the combination of the function’s derivatives is frequently used to determine the properties of a function.

Let g be a holomorphic function defined on Ω with g ( 0 ) = 1 . Recently, Ali et al. [8] have investigated some differential subordination results. More specifically, they studied the differential subordination:

1 + α ξ g ( ξ ) g n ( ξ ) 1 + ξ ,

and found

g ( ξ ) 1 + ξ , n = 0 , 1 , 2 ,

for some particular range of α . Similar types of results have been investigated by various authors, and one can found the articles contributed by Kumar et al. [9,10], Paprocki et al. [11], Raza et al. [12], Shi et al. [13], and Khan et al. [14].

We are essentially motivated by all of the aforementioned work and the recent research going on in differential subordinations, and we defined a subfamily of holomorphic functions based on the tangent function as follows:

(1.5) S tan = h A : ξ h ( ξ ) h ( ξ ) 1 + tan ( ξ ) 2 ; ( ξ Ω ) .

Geometric interpretation of the fact f S tan is that the image of ξ h ( ξ ) h ( ξ ) under open unit disk lies in the region bounded by domain 1 + tan ( ξ ) 2 . It is clear that a function f S tan if there exists the holomorphic functions q with property that q ( ξ ) q 0 ( ξ ) = 1 tan ( ξ ) 2 , such that

f ( ξ ) = ξ exp 0 ξ q ( t ) 1 t d t .

If we take q 0 ( ξ ) = 1 + tan ( ξ ) 2 , then

f ( ξ ) = ξ exp 0 ξ tan ( t ) 2 t d t = ξ + 1 2 ξ 2 + 1 8 ξ 3 + 11 144 ξ 4 + .

The aforementioned function plays the rule of extremal function for many problems.

Our further investigation is organized as follows. In Section 2, we give some necessary and sufficient conditions and the differential subordination implementation results related to Janowski and tangent functions. We also investigate some extreme point for our defined functions classes. The convex combination, closure theorem, growth and distortion bounds, and radii of close-to-starlikeness and starlikeness are also included in this section. In Section 3, we find the partial sum results, for this newly defined functions class of holomorphic functions. At the end, a new section, Conclusion, is included, where we concluded our work and also give a direction for future extension of this work.

We require the following lemma in order to verify our primary findings in the next sections.

Lemma 1.1

[15] Let μ be holomorphic in Ω with μ ( 0 ) = 0 . If μ ( ξ ) attains its maximum value on the circle ξ = r at a point ξ 0 = r e i θ , for θ [ π , π ] , we can write

ξ 0 μ ( ξ 0 ) = k μ ( ξ 0 ) ,

where m is real with m 1 .

2 Necessary and sufficient conditions

Theorem 2.1

Let 1 L 2 < sec h 2 ( 1 ) sec 2 ( 1 ) L 1 1 and suppose

1 + α ξ h ( ξ ) 1 + L 1 ξ 1 + L 2 ξ , ξ Ω .

If

(2.1) α 2 ( L 1 L 2 ) sec h 2 ( 1 ) L 2 sec 2 ( 1 ) ,

then

h ( ξ ) 1 + 1 2 tan ( ξ ) , ξ Ω .

Proof

Assume h ( ξ ) = 1 + 1 2 tan ( μ ( ξ ) ) , where μ is the holomorphic function with μ ( 0 ) = 0 . Let

k ( ξ ) = 1 + α ξ h ( ξ ) = 1 + α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) 2 .

Now, consider

k ( ξ ) 1 L 1 L 2 k ( ξ ) = α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) 2 L 1 L 2 1 + α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) 2 = α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) 2 ( L 1 L 2 ) + L 2 α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) .

Now, to achieve our goal, we have to prove that μ ( ξ ) < 1 , ξ Ω . In contrast, assume that ξ 0 belongs to Ω in such a way that max ξ ξ 0 μ ( ξ ) = μ ( ξ 0 ) = 1 , then by virtue of Lemma 1.1, there exists k 1 , such that ξ 0 μ ( ξ 0 ) = k μ ( ξ 0 ) . Let μ ( ξ 0 ) = e i θ for θ [ 0 , π ] . Then,

(2.2) k ( ξ 0 ) 1 L 1 L 2 k ( ξ 0 ) k α sec ( e i θ ) 2 2 ( L 1 L 2 ) + L 2 k α sec ( e i θ ) 2 .

A direct computation gives that

sec ( e i θ ) 2 = 1 cos ( cos ( θ ) ) cosh ( sin ( θ ) ) i sin ( cos ( θ ) ) sinh ( sin ( θ ) ) 2 = 1 cos 2 ( cos ( θ ) ) + cosh 2 ( sin ( θ ) ) 1 = φ ( θ ) .

Since φ ( θ ) = φ ( θ ) , consider θ [ 0 , π ] . Then,

min { φ ( θ ) } = φ π 2 = sec h 2 ( 1 ) , max { φ ( θ ) } = φ ( 0 ) = φ ( π ) = sec 2 ( 1 ) .

Therefore,

(2.3) sec h 2 ( 1 ) sec ( e i θ ) 2 sec 2 ( 1 ) .

Substituting (2.3) into (2.2), we obtain

k ( ξ 0 ) 1 L 1 L 2 k ( ξ 0 ) k α sec h 2 ( 1 ) 2 ( L 1 L 2 ) + L 2 k α sec 2 ( 1 ) = ϕ 1 ( k ) .

Then,

ϕ 1 ( k ) = 2 α sec h 2 ( 1 ) ( L 1 L 2 ) ( 2 ( L 1 L 2 ) + L 2 k α sec 2 ( 1 ) ) 2 > 0 ,

which shows that ϕ 1 ( k ) is the increasing function and the maximum value is attained at k = 1 and so

k ( ξ 0 ) 1 L 1 L 2 k ( ξ 0 ) α sec h 2 ( 1 ) 2 ( L 1 L 2 ) + L 2 α sec 2 ( 1 ) .

Now, by (2.1), we have

k ( ξ 0 ) 1 L 1 L 2 k ( ξ 0 ) 1 ,

which is a contradiction to the fact that h ( ξ ) 1 + L 1 ξ 1 + L 2 ξ , and hence, we obtain the required result.□

By setting L 1 = 1 and L 2 = 0 , in Theorem 2.1, we obtain the following result.

Corollary 2.2

Let

1 + α ξ h ( ξ ) 1 + ξ , ξ Ω .

If

(2.4) α 2 sec h 2 ( 1 ) ,

then

h ( ξ ) 1 + 1 2 tan ( ξ ) , ξ Ω .

Theorem 2.3

Let 1 L 2 < sec h 2 ( 1 ) sec 2 ( 1 ) L 1 1 and suppose

(2.5) 1 + α ξ h ( ξ ) h ( ξ ) 1 + L 1 ξ 1 + L 2 ξ , ξ Ω .

If

(2.6) α ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) ( L 1 L 2 ) sec h 2 ( 1 ) L 2 sec 2 ( 1 ) ,

then

h ( ξ ) 1 + 1 2 tan ( ξ ) , ξ Ω .

Proof

Assume h ( ξ ) = 1 + 1 2 tan ( μ ( ξ ) ) , where μ is the holomorphic function with μ ( 0 ) = 0 . Let

k 1 ( ξ ) = 1 + α ξ h ( ξ ) h ( ξ ) = 1 + α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) 2 + tan ( μ ( ξ ) ) .

Now, consider

k 1 ( ξ ) 1 L 1 L 2 k 1 ( ξ ) = α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) 2 + tan ( μ ( ξ ) ) L 1 L 2 1 + α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) 2 + tan ( μ ( ξ ) ) = α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) ( 2 + tan ( μ ( ξ ) ) ) ( L 1 L 2 ) + L 2 α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) .

To obtain the required result, we have to prove that μ ( ξ ) < 1 , ξ Ω . On the contrary, assume that ξ 0 belongs to Ω in such a way that max ξ ξ 0 μ ( ξ ) = μ ( ξ 0 ) = 1 ; then by virtue of Lemma 1.1, there exists k 1 , such that ξ 0 μ ( ξ 0 ) = k μ ( ξ 0 ) . Let μ ( ξ 0 ) = e i θ for θ [ 0 , π ] . Then,

(2.7) k 1 ( ξ 0 ) 1 L 1 L 2 k 1 ( ξ 0 ) k α sec ( e i θ ) 2 ( 2 + tan ( e i θ ) ) ( L 1 L 2 ) + L 2 k α sec ( e i θ ) 2 .

A direct computation gives that

tan ( e i θ ) 2 = sin ( cos ( x ) ) cosh ( sin ( x ) ) + i cos ( cos ( x ) ) sinh ( sin ( x ) ) cos ( cos ( θ ) ) cosh ( sin ( θ ) ) i sin ( cos ( θ ) ) sinh ( sin ( θ ) ) 2 = cosh 2 ( sin ( x ) ) cos 2 ( sin ( x ) ) cos 2 ( cos ( θ ) ) + cosh 2 ( sin ( θ ) ) 1 = φ 1 ( θ ) .

Since φ 1 ( θ ) = φ 1 ( θ ) , consider θ [ 0 , π ] . Then,

min { φ 1 ( θ ) } = φ 1 π 2 = tanh 2 ( 1 ) , max { φ 1 ( θ ) } = φ 1 ( 0 ) = φ 1 ( π ) = tan 2 ( 1 ) .

Therefore,

(2.8) tanh ( 1 ) tan ( e i θ ) tan ( 1 ) .

Substituting (2.3) and (2.8) into (2.7), we obtain

k 1 ( ξ 0 ) 1 L 1 L 2 k 1 ( ξ 0 ) k α sec h 2 ( 1 ) ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) ( L 1 L 2 ) + L 2 k α sec 2 ( 1 ) = ϕ 2 ( k ) .

Then,

ϕ 2 ( k ) = α sec h 2 ( 1 ) ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) ( L 1 L 2 ) ( ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) ( L 1 L 2 ) + L 2 k α sec 2 ( 1 ) ) 2 > 0 ,

which shows that ϕ 2 ( k ) is the increasing function and the maximum value is attained at k = 1 and so

k 1 ( ξ 0 ) 1 L 1 L 2 k 1 ( ξ 0 ) α sec h 2 ( 1 ) ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) ( L 1 L 2 ) + L 2 α sec 2 ( 1 ) .

Now, by (1.4), we have

k 1 ( ξ 0 ) 1 L 1 L 2 k 1 ( ξ 0 ) 1 ,

which contradicts (2.5), and so μ ( ξ ) < 1 for ξ < 1 , and hence, we obtain the desired result.□

By setting L 1 = 1 and L 2 = 0 , in Theorem 2.3, we obtain the following result.

Corollary 2.4

Let

(2.9) 1 + α ξ h ( ξ ) h ( ξ ) 1 + ξ , ξ Ω .

If

(2.10) α ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) sec h 2 ( 1 ) ,

then

h ( ξ ) 1 + 1 2 tan ( ξ ) , ξ Ω .

Theorem 2.5

Let 1 L 2 < sec h 2 ( 1 ) sec 2 ( 1 ) L 1 1 and suppose

(2.11) 1 + α ξ h ( ξ ) ( h ( ξ ) ) 2 1 + L 1 ξ 1 + L 2 ξ , ξ Ω .

If

(2.12) α ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) 2 ( L 1 L 2 ) 2 [ sec h 2 ( 1 ) L 2 sec 2 ( 1 ) ] ,

then

h ( ξ ) 1 + 1 2 tan ( ξ ) , ξ Ω .

Proof

Assume h ( ξ ) = 1 + 1 2 tan ( μ ( ξ ) ) , where μ is the holomorphic function with μ ( 0 ) = 0 . Let

k 2 ( ξ ) = 1 + α ξ h ( ξ ) ( h ( ξ ) ) 2 = 1 + 2 α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) ( 2 + tan ( μ ( ξ ) ) ) 2 .

Now, consider

k 2 ( ξ ) 1 L 1 L 2 k 2 ( ξ ) = 2 α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) ( 2 + tan ( μ ( ξ ) ) ) 2 L 1 L 2 1 + 2 α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) ( 2 + tan ( μ ( ξ ) ) ) 2 = 2 α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) ( 2 + tan ( μ ( ξ ) ) ) 2 ( L 1 L 2 ) + 2 L 2 α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) .

To prove the required result, we have to prove that μ ( ξ ) < 1 , ξ Ω . In contrast, assume that ξ 0 belongs to Ω in such a way that max ξ ξ 0 μ ( ξ ) = μ ( ξ 0 ) = 1 ; then, by virtue of Lemma 1.1, there exists k 1 , such that ξ 0 μ ( ξ 0 ) = k μ ( ξ 0 ) . Let μ ( ξ 0 ) = e i θ for θ [ 0 , π ] . Then,

(2.13) k 2 ( ξ 0 ) 1 L 1 L 2 k 2 ( ξ 0 ) 2 k α sec ( e i θ ) 2 ( 2 + tan ( e i θ ) ) 2 ( L 1 L 2 ) + 2 L 2 k α sec ( e i θ ) 2 .

Substituting (2.3) and (2.8) into (2.13), we obtain

k 2 ( ξ 0 ) 1 L 1 L 2 k 2 ( ξ 0 ) 2 k α sec h 2 ( 1 ) ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) 2 ( L 1 L 2 ) + 2 L 2 k α sec 2 ( 1 ) = ϕ 3 ( k ) .

Then,

ϕ 3 ( k ) = 2 α sec h 2 ( 1 ) ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) 2 ( L 1 L 2 ) ( ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) 2 ( L 1 L 2 ) + 2 L 2 k α sec 2 ( 1 ) ) 2 > 0 ,

which shows that ϕ 3 ( k ) is the increasing function and the maximum value is attained at k = 1 and so

k 2 ( ξ 0 ) 1 L 1 L 2 k 2 ( ξ 0 ) 2 α sec h 2 ( 1 ) ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) 2 ( L 1 L 2 ) + 2 L 2 α sec 2 ( 1 ) .

Now, by (2.12), we have

k 2 ( ξ 0 ) 1 L 1 L 2 k 2 ( ξ 0 ) 1 ,

which contradicts (2.11), and so μ ( ξ ) < 1 for ξ < 1 , and hence, we obtain the desired result.□

By setting L 1 = 1 and L 2 = 0 , in Theorem 2.5, we obtain the following result.

Corollary 2.6

Let

(2.14) 1 + α ξ h ( ξ ) ( h ( ξ ) ) 2 1 + ξ , ξ Ω .

If

(2.15) α ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) 2 2 sec h 2 ( 1 ) ,

then

h ( ξ ) 1 + 1 2 tan ( ξ ) , ξ Ω .

Theorem 2.7

Let 1 L 2 < sec h 2 ( 1 ) sec 2 ( 1 ) L 1 1 and suppose

(2.16) 1 + α ξ h ( ξ ) ( h ( ξ ) ) 3 1 + L 1 ξ 1 + L 2 ξ , ξ Ω .

If

(2.17) α ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) 3 ( L 1 L 2 ) 4 [ sec h 2 ( 1 ) L 2 sec 2 ( 1 ) ] ,

then

h ( ξ ) 1 + 1 2 tan ( ξ ) , ξ Ω .

Proof

Assume that h ( ξ ) = 1 + 1 2 tan ( μ ( ξ ) ) , where μ is the holomorphic function with μ ( 0 ) = 0 . Let

k 3 ( ξ ) = 1 + α ξ h ( ξ ) ( h ( ξ ) ) 3 = 1 + 4 α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) ( 2 + tan ( μ ( ξ ) ) ) 3 .

Now, consider

k 3 ( ξ ) 1 L 1 L 2 k 3 ( ξ ) = 4 α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) ( 2 + tan ( μ ( ξ ) ) ) 3 . L 1 L 2 1 + 4 α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) ( 2 + tan ( μ ( ξ ) ) ) 3 . = 4 α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) ( 2 + tan ( μ ( ξ ) ) ) 3 ( L 1 L 2 ) + 4 L 2 α ξ μ ( ξ ) sec 2 ( μ ( ξ ) ) .

To obtain the required conditions, we have to prove that μ ( ξ ) < 1 , ξ Ω . Contrary, assume that ξ 0 belongs to Ω in such a way that max ξ ξ 0 μ ( ξ ) = μ ( ξ 0 ) = 1 , then by virtue of Lemma 1.1, there exists k 1 , such that ξ 0 μ ( ξ 0 ) = k μ ( ξ 0 ) . Let μ ( ξ 0 ) = e i θ for θ [ 0 , π ] . Then, we have

(2.18) k 3 ( ξ 0 ) 1 L 1 L 2 k 3 ( ξ 0 ) 4 k α sec ( e i θ ) 2 ( 2 + tan ( e i θ ) ) 3 ( L 1 L 2 ) + 4 L 2 k α sec ( e i θ ) 2 .

Adjusting (2.3) and (2.8) into (2.18), we obtain

k 3 ( ξ 0 ) 1 L 1 L 2 k 3 ( ξ 0 ) 4 k α sec h 2 ( 1 ) ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) 3 ( L 1 L 2 ) + 4 L 2 k α sec 2 ( 1 ) = ϕ 4 ( k ) .

Then,

ϕ 4 ( k ) = 4 α sec h 2 ( 1 ) ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) 3 ( L 1 L 2 ) ( ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) 3 ( L 1 L 2 ) + 4 L 2 k α sec 2 ( 1 ) ) 2 > 0 ,

which shows that ϕ 4 ( k ) is the increasing function and the maximum value is attained at k = 1 and so

k 3 ( ξ 0 ) 1 L 1 L 2 k 3 ( ξ 0 ) 4 α sec h 2 ( 1 ) ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) 3 ( L 1 L 2 ) + 4 L 2 α sec 2 ( 1 ) .

Now, by (2.12), we have

k 3 ( ξ 0 ) 1 L 1 L 2 k 3 ( ξ 0 ) 1 ,

which contradicts (2.16), and so μ ( ξ ) < 1 for ξ < 1 , and hence, we obtain the desired result.□

By setting L 1 = 1 and L 2 = 0 , in Theorem 2.7, we obtain the following result.

Corollary 2.8

Let

(2.19) 1 + α ξ h ( ξ ) ( h ( ξ ) ) 3 1 + ξ , ξ Ω .

If

(2.20) α ( 2 + tan ( 1 ) ) 3 sec h 2 ( 1 ) sec 2 ( 1 ) ,

then

h ( ξ ) 1 + 1 2 tan ( ξ ) , ξ Ω .

Theorem 2.9

Suppose that h A and of the form given in (1.1) then h S tan if and only if

(2.21) 1 ξ h ( ξ ) ξ H ξ 2 ( 1 ξ ) ( 1 q ξ ) 0 ,

where

(2.22) H = 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) and a l s o f o r H = 1

Proof

For any function h S tan holomorphic in Ω , follows that 1 ξ h ( ξ ) 0 for all ξ in Ω = Ω { 0 } . Thus, we can have equation (2.21) if H = 1 . Now, by using (1.5) along with the principal of subordination, a Schwarz function μ exists with μ ( 0 ) = 0 and μ ( ξ ) < 1 , so

ξ h ( ξ ) h ( ξ ) = 1 + tan ( μ ( ξ ) ) 2 .

Here we consider μ ( ξ ) = e i θ , where 0 θ 2 π then above expression becomes

(2.23) ξ h ( ξ ) h ( ξ ) 1 + tan ( e i θ ) 2 .

(2.24) ξ h ( ξ ) 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 2 h ( ξ ) 0 .

Now, by using the relation

h ( ξ ) = h ( ξ ) ξ 1 ξ and ξ h ( ξ ) = h ( ξ ) ξ ( 1 ξ ) 2 ,

then equation (2.24), becomes

h ( ξ ) ξ ( 1 ξ ) 2 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 2 h ( ξ ) ξ 1 ξ 0 .

After some simple calculations, we obtain

h ( ξ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) 2 ξ 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 2 ξ 2 ( 1 ξ ) 2 0 .

h ( ξ ) ξ H ξ 2 ( 1 ξ ) 2 0 ,

where H = 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) ; thus, the necessary condition

1 ξ h ( ξ ) ξ H ξ 2 ( 1 ξ ) 2 0

holds.

Conversely, let the condition in (2.21) holds, then 1 ξ h ( ξ ) 0 for all ξ Ω . Let ξ ( ξ ) = ξ h ( ξ ) h ( ξ ) , which is holomorphic in Ω and ξ ( 0 ) = 1 . Furthermore, suppose that h ( ξ ) = 1 + tan ( ξ ) 2 and then from equation (2.23), it is clear that h ( Ω ) ξ ( ξ ) = Φ . Therefore, the connected component C \ h ( Ω ) contains the domain ξ ( ξ ) , which is also connected. Now, by the univalence of “ ξ ” together with the assumption h ( 0 ) = ξ ( 0 ) = 1 , it is clear that ξ h so h ( ξ ) S tan .

Theorem 2.10

Suppose that h A and of the form given in (1.1), then h ( ξ ) S tan , if and only if

(2.25) 1 n = 2 2 n 2 tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) a n ξ n 1 0 .

Proof

From Theorem (3.1), a function h S tan , then (2.21) holds true:

0 1 ξ h ( ξ ) ξ H ξ 2 ( 1 ξ ) 2 = 1 ξ h ( ξ ) ξ ( 1 ξ ) 2 h ( ξ ) H ξ 2 ( 1 ξ ) 2 = 1 ξ h ( ξ ) ξ ( 1 ξ ) 2 H h ( ξ ) ξ 2 ( 1 ξ ) 2 h ( ξ ) ξ ( 1 ξ ) 2 = ( 1 H ) h ( ξ ) + H h ( ξ ) ξ = 1 n = 2 ( n ( H 1 ) H ) a n ξ n 1 = 1 n = 2 2 n 2 tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) a n ξ n 1 .

Theorem 2.11

If h A is defined in (1.1) and satisfies the condition

(2.26) n = 2 2 n + 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) a n < 1 ,

then h S tan .

Proof

To prove the required result, we consider (2.25):

1 n = 2 2 n 2 tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) a n ξ n 1 > 1 n = 2 2 n + 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) a n ξ n 1 .

By using the given condition in (2.26), we have

(2.27) 1 n = 2 2 n + 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) a n > 0 .

So by Theorems 2.1 and 2.2, we see that h S tan .

Theorem 2.12

Let h S tan . and ξ = r . Then,

(2.28) r 4 + tan ( e i θ ) 6 + tan ( e i θ ) r 2 h ( ξ ) r + 4 + tan ( e i θ ) 6 + tan ( e i θ ) r 2 .

Proof

Consider

h ( ξ ) = ξ + n = 2 a n ξ n r + n = 2 a n r n .

Since r n r 2 for n 2 and r < 1 , we have

(2.29) h ( ξ ) r + r 2 n = 2 a n .

Similarly,

(2.30) h ( ξ ) r r 2 n = 2 a n .

Now, from (2.26), it implies that

n = 2 2 n + 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) a n < 1 .

Since

6 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) n = 2 a n n = 2 2 n + 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) a n ,

from this, we obtain

6 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) n = 2 a n < 1 .

One can easily write this as:

n = 2 a n < 4 + tan ( e i θ ) 6 + tan ( e i θ ) .

Now, substituting the aforementioned value into (2.29) and (2.30), we obtain the desired inequality.□

Theorem 2.13

Let h S tan and ξ = r . Then,

(2.31) 1 2 4 + tan ( e i θ ) 6 + tan ( e i θ ) r h ( ξ ) 1 + 2 4 + tan ( e i θ ) 6 + tan ( e i θ ) r .

Proof

Consider

h ( ξ ) = 1 + n = 2 n a n ξ n 1 + n = 2 a n r n 1 .

Since r n 1 r for n 2 and r < 1 , we have

(2.32) h ( ξ ) 1 + 2 r n = 2 a n .

Similarly,

(2.33) h ( ξ ) 1 2 r n = 2 a n .

Now, from (2.26), it implies that

n = 2 2 n + 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) a n < 1 .

Since

6 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) n = 2 a n n = 2 2 n + 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) a n ,

from this, we obtain

6 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) n = 2 a n < 1 .

One can easily write this as:

n = 2 a n < 4 + tan ( e i θ ) 6 + tan ( e i θ ) .

Now, inserting this value into (2.32) and (2.33), we obtain the desired inequality.□

Theorem 2.14

Let h k S tan , k = 1 , 2 , , such that

h k ( ξ ) = ξ + n = 2 a n , k ξ n .

Then, H ( ξ ) = k = 1 η k h k ( ξ ) , where n = 1 η k = 1 is in class S tan .

Proof

We have

H ( ξ ) = ξ + k = 1 n = 2 η k a n , k ξ n .

Due to Theorem 2.ii, it is sufficient to prove

n = 2 2 n + 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) η k a n , k = k = 1 η k n = 2 2 n + 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) a n , k < k = 1 η k = 1 .

Hence, H ( ξ ) S tan .

Theorem 2.15

The class S tan is closed under convex combination.

Proof

Let h 1 and h 2 be any functions in set S tan with the following series representation:

h 1 ( ξ ) = ξ + n = 2 a n ξ n and h 2 ( ξ ) = ξ + n = 2 b n ξ n .

We have to show that h ( ξ ) = λ h 1 ( ξ ) + ( 1 λ ) h 2 ( ξ ) , with 0 λ 1 , is in the class S tan . Since

h ( ξ ) = ξ + n = 2 [ λ a n + ( 1 λ ) b n ] ξ n .

Consider

n = 2 2 n + 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) λ a n + ( 1 λ ) b n λ n = 2 2 n + 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) a n + ( 1 λ ) n = 2 2 n + 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) b n < 1 .

Hence, h S tan .

Theorem 2.16

Let h S tan . Then, for ξ = r 1 , the function is the starlike of order α , where

r 1 = inf ( 1 α ) ( 2 n + 2 + tan ( e i θ ) ) ( n α ) ( 4 + tan ( e i θ ) ) 1 n 1 for n N \ { 1 } .

Proof

To show h is the starlike function of order α , it is enough to show that

ξ h ( ξ ) h ( ξ ) ξ h ( ξ ) ( 2 α 1 ) h ( ξ ) < 1 .

After simple computation, we obtain

(2.34) ξ h ( ξ ) h ( ξ ) ξ h ( ξ ) ( 2 α 1 ) h ( ξ ) n = 2 n α 1 α a n ξ n 1 .

Also from (2.26), we have

(2.35) n = 2 2 n + 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) a n < 1 .

From (2.34), the function on the left-hand side is bounded by 1 if

n = 2 n α 1 α ξ n 1 < n = 2 2 n + 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ ) ,

which implies that

ξ < ( 1 α ) ( 2 n + 2 + tan ( e i θ ) ) ( n α ) ( 4 + tan ( e i θ ) ) 1 n 1 = r 1 .

Hence, the proof is completed.□

3 Partial sum results

Silverman [16] was the first who found the sharp bounds for the ratio of a function to its partial sums, considering the subclasses of regular functions. Then, many researchers took inspiration from the work of Silverman and have studied the partial sum problems for various q -subclasses. In recent past, Jabeen et al. [17] investigated the partial sums results for q -convex functions defined by the q -Ruscheweyh differential operator in conic regions. In this portion, we discuss some lower bounds results of the function defined in (1.1) to its partial sum, which is defined as:

h m ( ξ ) = ξ + n = 2 m a n ξ n , ( r Ω ) .

Theorem 3.1

For h S tan , the coefficients of h are so small that satisfies Condition (2.26), then

(3.1) h ( ξ ) h m ( ξ ) 1 1 ε m + 1 , ( r Ω )

and

(3.2) h m ( ξ ) h ( ξ ) ε m + 1 1 + ε m + 1 ( r Ω ) ,

where

(3.3) ε n = 2 n + 2 + tan ( e i θ ) 4 + tan ( e i θ )

and

ε n 1 , for m = 2 , 3 , 4 , n ε m + 1 , for m = n + 1 .

Proof

To show the inequality in (3.1), we set

μ ( ξ ) = ε m + 1 h ( ξ ) h m ( ξ ) 1 1 ε m + 1 .

After some simple calculations, we have

μ ( ξ ) = n = 2 m a n ξ n 1 + ε m + 1 n = m + 1 a n ξ n 1 + 1 n = 2 m a n ξ n 1 .

Now, consider that

μ ( ξ ) 1 μ ( ξ ) + 1 = ε m + 1 n = m + 1 a n ξ n 1 2 + 2 n = 2 m a n ξ n 1 + ε m + 1 n = m + 1 a n ξ n 1 .

Using the triangular inequality, we obtain

μ ( ξ ) 1 μ ( ξ ) + 1 ε m + 1 n = m + 1 a m 2 2 n = 2 m a n ε m + 1 n = m + 1 a n .

Now, μ ( r ) 1 μ ( r ) + 1 1 , if and only if

(3.4) n = 2 m a n + ε m + 1 n = m + 1 a n 1 .

For the desired result, it would be enough to show that the left-hand side of (3.4) is bounded above by n = 2 ε n a n , i.e.,

n = 2 m a n + ε m + 1 n = m + 1 a n n = 2 ε n a n .

On simple calculations, it gives

n = 2 m ( ε n 1 ) a n + n = m + 1 ( ε n ε n + 1 ) a n 0 ,

which gives the proof of (3.1).

For (3.2), we set

μ ( ξ ) = ( 1 + ε m + 1 ) h ( ξ ) h m ( ξ ) ε m + 1 1 + m x + 1 .

After some simple calculations, we have

μ ( ξ ) = 1 + m n = 2 a n ξ n 1 ε m + 1 n = m + 1 a n ξ n 1 1 + m n = 2 a n ξ n 1 ,

which gives

μ ( ξ ) 1 μ ( ξ ) + 1 ( 1 + ε m + 1 ) n = m + 1 a n 2 2 n = 2 m a n ( ε m + 1 1 ) n = m + 1 a n .

Now, μ ( ξ ) 1 μ ( ξ ) + 1 1 , where

(3.5) n = 2 m a n + ε m + 1 n = m + 1 a n 1 .

Finally, we can see that the left-hand side of the inequality in (3.5) is bounded above by:

n = 2 ε n a n ,

so we have completed the proof of the second assertion. And so, we have completed the proof of our theorem.□

Theorem 3.2

If h S tan , of the form given in (1.1), then

(3.6) h ( ξ ) h m ( ξ ) 1 m + 1 ε m + 1 , ( r Ω )

and

(3.7) h m ( ξ ) h ( ξ ) ε m + 1 m + 1 + ε m + 1 , ( r Ω ) ,

where ε m is given in (3.3).

Proof

The relevant details are skipped here because the proof is identical to that of Theorem 3.8.□

4 Conclusions

In this article, we have first introduced a new family of holomorphic tangent functions. Then, we examined some useful numbers of geometric properties of the holomorphic functions connected with trigonometric tangent function, which is symmetric about the real axis. These results comprising the implementation of subordination, necessary and sufficient conditions based on the use of the convolution operator, growth and distortion bounds, the closure theorem, convex combination, radii of starlikeness and close-to-starlikeness, the extreme point theorem, and partial sums results for newly defined classes have also been covered.

Furthermore, some other results such as coefficient estimates, logarithmic coefficient estimates, Hankel determinant, and many more results can be debated in future work. Moreover, this concept can be expanded to include meromorphic, multivalent, and quantum calculus functions. Also, one can apply the idea of basic (or q -) calculus and obtain the required results (see for details [1826]).

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia, and Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and this research was partially supported under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) project code FRGS/1/2021/ STG06/UMT/02/1 and Vote no. 59659.

  1. Funding information: The fourth author was supported by the researchers’ Supporting Project Number (RSP2024R401), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

  2. Author contributions: Conceptualization, MGK, WKM and ZS; Data curation, MGK, BK and SNM; Formal Analysis, MGK and BK; Funding acquisition, ZS; Investigation, MGK, WKM and FT; Methodology, MGK, FT and BK; Project administration, ZS and WKM; Resources, MGK and FT; Software, MGK, BK and SNM; Supervision, WKM and ZS; Validation, FT and SNM; Visualization, BK and SNM; Writing-original draft, MGK; Writing-review & editing, WKM, ZS and FT. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

[1] W. Ma and D. A. Minda, Unified treatment of some special classes of univalent functions, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2011 (2011), 18–36. Search in Google Scholar

[2] W. Janowski, Extremal problems for a family of functions with positive real part and for some related families, Ann. Polonici Math. 23 (1971), 159–177. 10.4064/ap-23-2-159-177Search in Google Scholar

[3] S. S. Kumar and K. Arora, Starlike functions associated with a petal shaped domain, Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 59 (2022), 993–1010. Search in Google Scholar

[4] K. Ullah, H. M. Srivastava, A. Rafiq, M. Arif, and S. Arjika, A study of sharp coefficient bounds for a new subfamily of starlike functions, J. Inequ. Appl. 202 (2021), 1–20. 10.1186/s13660-021-02729-1Search in Google Scholar

[5] R. Mendiratta, S. Nagpal, and V. Ravichandran, On a subclass of strongly starlike functions associated with exponential function, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 38 (2015), 365–386. 10.1007/s40840-014-0026-8Search in Google Scholar

[6] N. E. Cho, V. Kumar, S. S. Kumar, and V. Ravichandran, Radius problems for starlike functions associated with the sine function, Bull. Iran. Math. Soc. 45 (2019), 213–232. 10.1007/s41980-018-0127-5Search in Google Scholar

[7] F. Zulfiqar, S. N. Malik, M. Raza, and M. Ali, Fourth-Order Hankel determinants and Toeplitz determinants for convex functions connected with sine functions, J. Math. 2022 (2022), 156–164. 10.1155/2022/2871511Search in Google Scholar

[8] R. M. Ali, N. E. Cho, V. Ravichandran, and S. S. Kumar, Differential subordination for functions associated with the lemniscate of Bernoulli, Taiwanese J. Math. 16 (2021), 1017–1026. 10.11650/twjm/1500406676Search in Google Scholar

[9] S. S. Kumar, V. Kumar, V. Ravichandran, and N. E. Cho, Sufficient conditions for starlike functions associated with the lemniscate of Bernoulli, J. Inequ. Appl. 2013 (2013), 176. 10.1186/1029-242X-2013-176Search in Google Scholar

[10] S. Kumar and V. Ravichandran, Subordinations for functions with positive real part, Compex Anal. Oper. Theory 12 (2018), 1179–1191. 10.1007/s11785-017-0690-4Search in Google Scholar

[11] E. Paprocki and J. Sokól, The extremal problems in some subclass of strongly starlike functions, Zeszyty Nauk. Politech. Rzeszowskiej Mat, 20 (1996), 89–94. Search in Google Scholar

[12] M. Raza, J. Sokól, and S. Mushtaq, Differential subordinations for analytic functions, Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A sci. 43 (2019), 883–890. 10.1007/s40995-017-0430-7Search in Google Scholar

[13] L. Shi, H. M. Srivastava, M. G. Khan, N. Khan, B. Ahmad, B. Khan, and W. K. Mashwani, Certain subclasses of analytic multivalent functions associated with petal-shape domain, Axioms 10 (2021), 291. 10.3390/axioms10040291Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. G. Khan, B, Khan, J. Gong, F. Tchier, and F. M. O. Tawfiq, Applications of first-order differential subordination for subfamilies of analytic functions related to symmetric image domains, Symmetry 15 (2023), 2004, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15112004. 10.3390/sym15112004Search in Google Scholar

[15] I. S. Jack, Functions starlike and convex order alpha, J. Math. Soc. 2 (1971), 469–474. 10.1112/jlms/s2-3.3.469Search in Google Scholar

[16] H. Silverman, Partial sums of starlike and convex functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 209 (1997), 221–227. 10.1006/jmaa.1997.5361Search in Google Scholar

[17] M. Jabeen, S. N. Malik, S. Mahmood, S. M. J. Riaz, and M. S. Ali, On q-convex functions defined by the q-Ruscheweyh derivative operator in conic regions, J. Math. 2022 (2022), 1–12. 10.1155/2022/2681789Search in Google Scholar

[18] J. Cao, H.-Li Zhou, and S. Arjika, Generalized q-difference equations for (q,c)-hypergeometric polynomials and some applications, Ramanujan J. 60 (2023), 1033–1067. 10.1007/s11139-022-00634-9Search in Google Scholar

[19] J. Cao, J.-Y Huang, M. Fadel, and S. Arjika, A review of q-difference equations for Al-Salam-Carlitz polynomials and applications to U(n+1) type generating functions and Ramanujanas integrals, Mathematics 11 (2023), 1655, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math11071655. 10.3390/math11071655Search in Google Scholar

[20] J. Cao, F. Qi, and W.-S. Dui, Closed-form formulas for the nth derivative of the power-exponential function xx, Symmetry 15 (2023), 323, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020323. 10.3390/sym15020323Search in Google Scholar

[21] M. G. Khan, B. Khan, F. M. O. Tawfiq, and J.-S. Ro, Zalcman functional and majorization results for certain subfamilies of holomorphic functions, Axioms 12 (2023), 868, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12090868. 10.3390/axioms12090868Search in Google Scholar

[22] M. G. Khan, W. K. Mashwani, L. Shi, S. Araci, B. Ahmad, and B. Khan, Hankel inequalities for bounded turning functions in the domain of cosine Hyperbolic function, AIMS Mathematics 8 (2023), 21993–22008, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20231121. 10.3934/math.20231121Search in Google Scholar

[23] M. G. Khan, W. K. Mashwani, J-S. Ro, and B. Ahmad, Problems concerning sharp coefficient functionals of bounded turning functions, AIMS Mathematics 8 (2023), 27396–27413, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20231402. 10.3934/math.20231402Search in Google Scholar

[24] T. G. Shaba, S. Araci, B. O. Adebesin, F. Tchier, S. Zainab, and B. Khan, Sharp Bounds of the Fekete-Szegö problem and second Hankel determinant for certain Bi-Univalent functions defined by a Novel q-differential operator associated with q-Limaçon domain, Fractal Fract. 7 (2023), 506, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7070506. 10.3390/fractalfract7070506Search in Google Scholar

[25] C. Zhang, B. Khan, T. G. Shaba, J.-S. Ro, S. Araci, and M. G. Khan, Applications of q-Hermite polynomials to subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions, Fractal Fract. 6 (2022), 420, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6080420. 10.3390/fractalfract6080420Search in Google Scholar

[26] Q. Hu, T. G. Shaba, J. Younis, B. Khan, W. K. Mashwani, and M. Caglar, Applications of q-derivative operator to subclasses of bi-univalent functions involving Gegenbauer polynomial, Appl. Math. Sci. Eng. 30 (2022), 501–520. 10.1080/27690911.2022.2088743Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-03-05
Revised: 2023-10-05
Accepted: 2023-11-16
Published Online: 2024-04-12

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. On the p-fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff equations with electromagnetic fields and the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev nonlinearity
  3. L-Fuzzy fixed point results in -metric spaces with applications
  4. Solutions of a coupled system of hybrid boundary value problems with Riesz-Caputo derivative
  5. Nonparametric methods of statistical inference for double-censored data with applications
  6. LADM procedure to find the analytical solutions of the nonlinear fractional dynamics of partial integro-differential equations
  7. Existence of projected solutions for quasi-variational hemivariational inequality
  8. Spectral collocation method for convection-diffusion equation
  9. New local fractional Hermite-Hadamard-type and Ostrowski-type inequalities with generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel for generalized h-preinvex functions
  10. On the asymptotics of eigenvalues for a Sturm-Liouville problem with symmetric single-well potential
  11. On exact rate of convergence of row sequences of multipoint Hermite-Padé approximants
  12. The essential norm of bounded diagonal infinite matrices acting on Banach sequence spaces
  13. Decay rate of the solutions to the Cauchy problem of the Lord Shulman thermoelastic Timoshenko model with distributed delay
  14. Enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of two uniformly convergent numerical solvers for singularly perturbed parabolic convection–diffusion–reaction problems with two small parameters
  15. An inertial shrinking projection self-adaptive algorithm for solving split variational inclusion problems and fixed point problems in Banach spaces
  16. An equation for complex fractional diffusion created by the Struve function with a T-symmetric univalent solution
  17. On the existence and Ulam-Hyers stability for implicit fractional differential equation via fractional integral-type boundary conditions
  18. Some properties of a class of holomorphic functions associated with tangent function
  19. The existence of multiple solutions for a class of upper critical Choquard equation in a bounded domain
  20. On the continuity in q of the family of the limit q-Durrmeyer operators
  21. Results on solutions of several systems of the product type complex partial differential difference equations
  22. On Berezin norm and Berezin number inequalities for sum of operators
  23. Geometric invariants properties of osculating curves under conformal transformation in Euclidean space ℝ3
  24. On a generalization of the Opial inequality
  25. A novel numerical approach to solutions of fractional Bagley-Torvik equation fitted with a fractional integral boundary condition
  26. Holomorphic curves into projective spaces with some special hypersurfaces
  27. On Periodic solutions for implicit nonlinear Caputo tempered fractional differential problems
  28. Approximation of complex q-Beta-Baskakov-Szász-Stancu operators in compact disk
  29. Existence and regularity of solutions for non-autonomous integrodifferential evolution equations involving nonlocal conditions
  30. Jordan left derivations in infinite matrix rings
  31. Nonlinear nonlocal elliptic problems in ℝ3: existence results and qualitative properties
  32. Invariant means and lacunary sequence spaces of order (α, β)
  33. Novel results for two families of multivalued dominated mappings satisfying generalized nonlinear contractive inequalities and applications
  34. Global in time well-posedness of a three-dimensional periodic regularized Boussinesq system
  35. Existence of solutions for nonlinear problems involving mixed fractional derivatives with p(x)-Laplacian operator
  36. Some applications and maximum principles for multi-term time-space fractional parabolic Monge-Ampère equation
  37. On three-dimensional q-Riordan arrays
  38. Some aspects of normal curve on smooth surface under isometry
  39. Mittag-Leffler-Hyers-Ulam stability for a first- and second-order nonlinear differential equations using Fourier transform
  40. Topological structure of the solution sets to non-autonomous evolution inclusions driven by measures on the half-line
  41. Remark on the Daugavet property for complex Banach spaces
  42. Decreasing and complete monotonicity of functions defined by derivatives of completely monotonic function involving trigamma function
  43. Uniqueness of meromorphic functions concerning small functions and derivatives-differences
  44. Asymptotic approximations of Apostol-Frobenius-Euler polynomials of order α in terms of hyperbolic functions
  45. Hyers-Ulam stability of Davison functional equation on restricted domains
  46. Involvement of three successive fractional derivatives in a system of pantograph equations and studying the existence solution and MLU stability
  47. Composition of some positive linear integral operators
  48. On bivariate fractal interpolation for countable data and associated nonlinear fractal operator
  49. Generalized result on the global existence of positive solutions for a parabolic reaction-diffusion model with an m × m diffusion matrix
  50. Online makespan minimization for MapReduce scheduling on multiple parallel machines
  51. The sequential Henstock-Kurzweil delta integral on time scales
  52. On a discrete version of Fejér inequality for α-convex sequences without symmetry condition
  53. Existence of three solutions for two quasilinear Laplacian systems on graphs
  54. Embeddings of anisotropic Sobolev spaces into spaces of anisotropic Hölder-continuous functions
  55. Nilpotent perturbations of m-isometric and m-symmetric tensor products of commuting d-tuples of operators
  56. Characterizations of transcendental entire solutions of trinomial partial differential-difference equations in ℂ2#
  57. Fractional Sturm-Liouville operators on compact star graphs
  58. Exact controllability for nonlinear thermoviscoelastic plate problem
  59. Improved modified gradient-based iterative algorithm and its relaxed version for the complex conjugate and transpose Sylvester matrix equations
  60. Superposition operator problems of Hölder-Lipschitz spaces
  61. A note on λ-analogue of Lah numbers and λ-analogue of r-Lah numbers
  62. Ground state solutions and multiple positive solutions for nonhomogeneous Kirchhoff equation with Berestycki-Lions type conditions
  63. A note on 1-semi-greedy bases in p-Banach spaces with 0 < p ≤ 1
  64. Fixed point results for generalized convex orbital Lipschitz operators
  65. Asymptotic model for the propagation of surface waves on a rotating magnetoelastic half-space
  66. Multiplicity of k-convex solutions for a singular k-Hessian system
  67. Poisson C*-algebra derivations in Poisson C*-algebras
  68. Signal recovery and polynomiographic visualization of modified Noor iteration of operators with property (E)
  69. Approximations to precisely localized supports of solutions for non-linear parabolic p-Laplacian problems
  70. Solving nonlinear fractional differential equations by common fixed point results for a pair of (α, Θ)-type contractions in metric spaces
  71. Pseudo compact almost automorphic solutions to a family of delay differential equations
  72. Periodic measures of fractional stochastic discrete wave equations with nonlinear noise
  73. Asymptotic study of a nonlinear elliptic boundary Steklov problem on a nanostructure
  74. Cramer's rule for a class of coupled Sylvester commutative quaternion matrix equations
  75. Quantitative estimates for perturbed sampling Kantorovich operators in Orlicz spaces
  76. Review Articles
  77. Penalty method for unilateral contact problem with Coulomb's friction in time-fractional derivatives
  78. Differential sandwich theorems for p-valent analytic functions associated with a generalization of the integral operator
  79. Special Issue on Development of Fuzzy Sets and Their Extensions - Part II
  80. Higher-order circular intuitionistic fuzzy time series forecasting methodology: Application of stock change index
  81. Binary relations applied to the fuzzy substructures of quantales under rough environment
  82. Algorithm selection model based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision in big data information mining
  83. A new machine learning approach based on spatial fuzzy data correlation for recognizing sports activities
  84. Benchmarking the efficiency of distribution warehouses using a four-phase integrated PCA-DEA-improved fuzzy SWARA-CoCoSo model for sustainable distribution
  85. Special Issue on Application of Fractional Calculus: Mathematical Modeling and Control - Part II
  86. A study on a type of degenerate poly-Dedekind sums
  87. Efficient scheme for a category of variable-order optimal control problems based on the sixth-kind Chebyshev polynomials
  88. Special Issue on Mathematics for Artificial intelligence and Artificial intelligence for Mathematics
  89. Toward automated hail disaster weather recognition based on spatio-temporal sequence of radar images
  90. The shortest-path and bee colony optimization algorithms for traffic control at single intersection with NetworkX application
  91. Neural network quaternion-based controller for port-Hamiltonian system
  92. Matching ontologies with kernel principle component analysis and evolutionary algorithm
  93. Survey on machine vision-based intelligent water quality monitoring techniques in water treatment plant: Fish activity behavior recognition-based schemes and applications
  94. Artificial intelligence-driven tone recognition of Guzheng: A linear prediction approach
  95. Transformer learning-based neural network algorithms for identification and detection of electronic bullying in social media
  96. Squirrel search algorithm-support vector machine: Assessing civil engineering budgeting course using an SSA-optimized SVM model
  97. Special Issue on International E-Conference on Mathematical and Statistical Sciences - Part I
  98. Some fixed point results on ultrametric spaces endowed with a graph
  99. On the generalized Mellin integral operators
  100. On existence and multiplicity of solutions for a biharmonic problem with weights via Ricceri's theorem
  101. Approximation process of a positive linear operator of hypergeometric type
  102. On Kantorovich variant of Brass-Stancu operators
  103. A higher-dimensional categorical perspective on 2-crossed modules
  104. Special Issue on Some Integral Inequalities, Integral Equations, and Applications - Part I
  105. On parameterized inequalities for fractional multiplicative integrals
  106. On inverse source term for heat equation with memory term
  107. On Fejér-type inequalities for generalized trigonometrically and hyperbolic k-convex functions
  108. New extensions related to Fejér-type inequalities for GA-convex functions
  109. Derivation of Hermite-Hadamard-Jensen-Mercer conticrete inequalities for Atangana-Baleanu fractional integrals by means of majorization
  110. Some Hardy's inequalities on conformable fractional calculus
  111. The novel quadratic phase Fourier S-transform and associated uncertainty principles in the quaternion setting
  112. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Fixed-Point Theory and Applications - Part I
  113. A novel iterative process for numerical reckoning of fixed points via generalized nonlinear mappings with qualitative study
  114. Some new fixed point theorems of α-partially nonexpansive mappings
  115. Generalized Yosida inclusion problem involving multi-valued operator with XOR operation
  116. Periodic and fixed points for mappings in extended b-gauge spaces equipped with a graph
  117. Convergence of Peaceman-Rachford splitting method with Bregman distance for three-block nonconvex nonseparable optimization
  118. Topological structure of the solution sets to neutral evolution inclusions driven by measures
  119. (α, F)-Geraghty-type generalized F-contractions on non-Archimedean fuzzy metric-unlike spaces
  120. Solvability of infinite system of integral equations of Hammerstein type in three variables in tempering sequence spaces c 0 β and 1 β
  121. Special Issue on Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Their Applications - Part I
  122. Fuzzy fractional delay integro-differential equation with the generalized Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative
  123. Klein-Gordon potential in characteristic coordinates
  124. Asymptotic analysis of Leray solution for the incompressible NSE with damping
  125. Special Issue on Blow-up Phenomena in Nonlinear Equations of Mathematical Physics - Part I
  126. Long time decay of incompressible convective Brinkman-Forchheimer in L2(ℝ3)
  127. Numerical solution of general order Emden-Fowler-type Pantograph delay differential equations
  128. Global smooth solution to the n-dimensional liquid crystal equations with fractional dissipation
  129. Spectral properties for a system of Dirac equations with nonlinear dependence on the spectral parameter
  130. A memory-type thermoelastic laminated beam with structural damping and microtemperature effects: Well-posedness and general decay
  131. The asymptotic behavior for the Navier-Stokes-Voigt-Brinkman-Forchheimer equations with memory and Tresca friction in a thin domain
  132. Absence of global solutions to wave equations with structural damping and nonlinear memory
  133. Special Issue on Differential Equations and Numerical Analysis - Part I
  134. Vanishing viscosity limit for a one-dimensional viscous conservation law in the presence of two noninteracting shocks
  135. Limiting dynamics for stochastic complex Ginzburg-Landau systems with time-varying delays on unbounded thin domains
  136. A comparison of two nonconforming finite element methods for linear three-field poroelasticity
Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dema-2023-0142/html
Scroll to top button