Home Long time decay of incompressible convective Brinkman-Forchheimer in L2(ℝ3)
Article Open Access

Long time decay of incompressible convective Brinkman-Forchheimer in L2(ℝ3)

  • Lotfi Jlali EMAIL logo and Jamel Benameur
Published/Copyright: August 6, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this article, we study the global existence, uniqueness, and continuity for the solution of incompressible convective Brinkman-Forchheimer on the whole space R 3 when 4 μ β 1 . Additionally, we give an asymptotic type of convergence of the global solution.

MSC 2010: 35Q35; 35A02; 35B44

1 Introduction

The incompressible convective Brinkman-Forchheimer equations on the whole space R 3 are given by

( CBF ) t u μ Δ u + u u + α u + β u r 1 u + p = 0 , in R + × R 3 , div u = 0 , in R + × R 3 , u ( 0 , x ) = u 0 ( x ) , in R 3 ,

where u ( x , t ) = ( u 1 , u 2 , u 3 ) denotes the velocity field, and the scalar function p ( x , t ) represents the pressure. The constant μ denotes the positive Brinkman coefficient (effective viscosity). Besides, α and β , which are two positive constants, denote, respectively, the Darcy (permeability of porous medium) and Forchheimer (proportional to the porosity of the material) coefficients. The exponent r can be greater than or equal to 1.

The equations Convective Brinkman Forchheimer (CBF) describe the motion of incompressible fluid flows in a saturated porous medium. This model has been used in connection with some real-world phenomena, e.g., in the theory of non-Newtonian fluids (see e.g., Shenoy [1]) or in tidal dynamics (see, e.g., Gordeev [2]; Likhtarnikov [3]).

In what follows, we will consider only the critical homogenous CBF equations when r = 3 :

( S ) t u μ Δ u + u u + α u + β u 2 u + p = 0 , in R + × R 3 , div u = 0 , in R + × R 3 , u ( 0 , x ) = u 0 ( x ) , in R 3 .

The first equation of system ( S ) has the same scaling as the Navier-Stokes equations ( N S E ) only when the permeability coefficient α is equal to zero. In this case, when ( α = 0 ) is called damped NSE where the damping term is β u r 1 u . The resistance to the motion of the flow, which is caused by physical factors such as porous media flow, drag or friction, or other dissipative mechanisms, is shaped by the damping term β u r 1 u . Several authors studied the damped NSE among them Cai and Jiu [4] proved the global existence of weak solution in

L ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) L 2 ( R + , H ˙ 1 ( R 3 ) ) L r + 1 ( R + , L r + 1 ( R 3 ) ) .

Benameur [5] brought new findings to the field, which is the model damping a ( e b u 2 1 ) u . He used the Friedrich method and some new tools to prove that there is a global solution u in

L ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) C ( R + , H 2 ( R 3 ) ) L 2 ( R + , H ˙ 1 ( R 3 ) ) b ,

where b = { f L 4 ( R + × R 3 ) : ( e b f 2 1 ) f 2 L 1 ( R + × R 3 ) } .

Before treating the global existence, we consider the definition of weak solutions.

Definition 1.1

The function pair ( u , p ) is called a weak solution of the problem ( S ) if for any T > 0 , the following conditions are satisfied:

  1. u L ( [ 0 , T ] ; L σ 2 ( R 3 ) ) L 2 ( [ 0 , T ] ; H ˙ 1 ( R 3 ) ) L 4 ( [ 0 , T ] , L 4 ( R 3 ) ) .

  2. t u μ Δ u + u u + α u + β u 2 u = p in D ( [ 0 , T ] × R 3 ) : for any Φ C 0 ( [ 0 , T ] × R 3 ) such that div Φ ( t , x ) = 0 for all ( t , x ) [ 0 , T ] × R 3 and Φ ( T ) = 0 , we have

    0 T ( u ; t Φ ) L 2 + 0 T ( u ; Φ ) L 2 + α 0 T ( u ; Φ ) L 2 + 0 T ( ( u ) u ; Φ ) L 2 + β 0 T ( u 2 u ; Φ ) L 2 = ( u 0 ; Φ ( 0 ) ) L 2 .

  3. div u ( x , t ) = 0 for a.e. ( t , x ) [ 0 , T ] × R 3 . ( ( ; ) L 2 is the inner product in L 2 ( R 3 ) .)

Theorem 1.1

Let u 0 L 2 ( R 3 ) be a divergence-free vector fields and 4 μ β 1 , then there is a unique global solution u C b ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) L 2 ( R + , H ˙ 1 ( R 3 ) ) L 4 ( R + , L 4 ( R 3 ) ) of ( S ) . Moreover, we have

(1.1) u ( t ) L 2 2 + 2 μ 0 t u L 2 2 + 2 α 0 t u L 2 2 + 2 β 0 t u L 4 4 d u 0 L 2 2 , t 0 ,

(1.2) e 2 α t u ( t ) L 2 2 + 2 μ 0 t e 2 α z u ( z ) L 2 2 d z + 2 β 0 t e 2 α z u ( z ) L 4 4 d z u 0 L 2 2 , t 0 .

Remark 1.1

  1. Unlike in other blow-up problems (see [68]) when the nonlinear capacity methods is used, in this work, the proof of existence and uniqueness is based on the Friedrich method. The continuity and uniqueness are proved by new tools.

  2. The proofs of (1.1) and (1.2) are given by the Friedrich method and Cantor diagonal process, respectively.

  3. The uniqueness and inequality (1.2) imply that ( t e 2 α t u ( t ) L 2 2 ) is decreasing. Indeed, for 0 t 1 t 2 , by uniqueness of this solution, we obtain

    e 2 α ( t 2 t 1 ) u ( t 2 ) L 2 2 = e 2 α ( t 2 t 1 ) u ( t 1 + ( t 2 t 1 ) ) L 2 2 u ( t 1 ) L 2 2

    and

    e 2 α t 2 u ( t 2 ) L 2 2 e 2 α t 1 u ( t 1 ) L 2 2 .

  4. The last property does not imply that lim t e α t u ( t ) L 2 = 0 .

  5. The idea of looking for an asymptotic type of convergence e α t u ( t ) L 2 to zero is due to the following: the solution of linear system

    ( SL ) t f μ Δ f + α f = 0 , in R + × R 3 , div f = 0 , in R + × R 3 , f ( 0 , x ) = u 0 ( x ) , in R 3 ,

    has the following form:

    f ( t , x ) = e α t e μ t Δ u 0 .

    We have

    e α t f ( t ) L 2 = e μ t Δ u 0 L 2 .

    The dominated convergence theorem implies that

    lim t e α t f ( t ) L 2 = 0 .

We are now ready to state the second result.

Theorem 1.2

Let u 0 L 2 ( R 3 ) be a divergence-free vector fields and 4 μ β 1 . If u C b ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) L 2 ( R + , H ˙ 1 ( R 3 ) ) L 4 ( R + , L 4 ( R 3 ) ) is the unique global solution of (S) given by Theorem 1.1, then

(1.3) u ( t ) L 2 = o ( e α t ) , t .

The remainder of this article is organized as follows. In Second 2, we give some notations, definitions, and preliminary results. Section 3 is devoted to prove Theorem 1.1, and this proof is done in two steps. In the first, we give a general result of equicontinuity, while in the second, we apply the Friedritch method to construct a global solution of ( S ) . Moreover, uniqueness and the continuity of solution are also mentioned. In Section 4, we study the large time decay.

2 Notations and preliminary results

2.1 Notations

  • For a function f : R 3 R ¯ and R > 0 , the Friedrich operator J R is defined by

    J R ( D ) = 1 ( χ B R f ^ ) ,

    where B R is the ball of center 0 and radius R .

  • L σ 2 ( R 3 ) = { f ( L 2 ( R 3 ) ) 3 ; div f = 0 } ,

  • The Leray projection P : ( L 2 ( R 3 ) ) 3 ( L 2 ( R 3 ) ) 3 is defined by

    1 ( P f ) = f ^ ( ξ ) f ^ ( ξ ) ξ ξ ξ ξ = M ( ξ ) f ^ ( ξ ) ,

    where M ( ξ ) is the matrix δ k , ξ k ξ ξ 2 1 k , 3 .

2.2 Preliminary results

In this section, we collect some classical results, and we give some lemmas that are well suited to the study of system ( S ) . We start by the following elementary inequality.

Proposition 2.1

[9] Let H be Hilbert space.

  1. If ( x n ) is a bounded sequence of elements in H , then there is a subsequence ( x φ ( n ) ) such that

    ( x φ ( n ) y ) ( x y ) , y H .

  2. If x H and ( x n ) is a bounded sequence of elements in H such that

    ( x n y ) ( x y ) , y H ,

    then x liminf n x n .

  3. If x H and ( x n ) is a bounded sequence of elements in H such that

    ( x n y ) ( x y ) , y H

    and

    limsup n x n x ,

    then lim n x n x = 0 .

Lemma 2.1

[10] Let s 1 and s 2 be two real numbers.

  1. If s 1 < 3 2 and s 1 + s 2 > 0 , there exists a constant C 1 = C 1 ( s 1 , s 2 ) , such that if f , g H ˙ s 1 ( R 3 ) H ˙ s 2 ( R 3 ) , then f . g H ˙ s 1 + s 2 3 2 ( R 3 ) and

    f g H ˙ s 1 + s 2 3 2 C 1 ( f H ˙ s 1 g H ˙ s 2 + f H ˙ s 2 g H ˙ s 1 ) .

  2. If s 1 , s 2 < 3 2 and s 1 + s 2 > 0 , there exists a constant C 2 = C 2 ( s 1 , s 2 ) such that: if f H ˙ s 1 ( R 3 ) and g H ˙ s 2 ( R 3 ) , then f . g H ˙ s 1 + s 2 3 2 ( R 3 ) and

    f g H ˙ s 1 + s 2 3 2 C 2 f H ˙ s 1 g H ˙ s 2 .

Lemma 2.2

[11] For all x , y R 3 , we have

( x 2 x y 2 ) y ( x y ) 1 2 ( x 2 + y 2 ) x y 2 .

Lemma 2.3

[5] For all s > d 2 : L 1 ( R d ) H s ( R d ) . Moreover, we have

f H s ( R d ) σ s , d f L 1 ( R d ) , f H s ( R d ) ,

where σ s , d = R d ( 1 + ξ 2 ) s d ξ 1 2 .

Lemma 2.4

[5] Let p ( 1 , ) and Ω be an open subset of R 4 . If ( f n ) is a bounded sequence in L 2 ( Ω ) L p ( Ω ) and f L 2 ( Ω ) such that

lim n ( f n g ) L 2 = ( f g ) L 2 , g L 2 ( Ω ) .

Then, f L p ( Ω ) and

f L 2 liminf n f n L 2 , f L p liminf n f n L p .

3 Proof of Theorem 1.1

This proof is done in two steps.

3.1 Step 1

In this step, we prove a general result for bounded sequence in energy space of system ( S ) .

Proposition 3.1

Let ν 1 , ν 2 , ν 3 [ 0 , ) , r 1 , r 2 , r 3 ( 0 , ) , and f 0 L σ 2 ( R 3 ) . For n N , let F n : R + × R 3 R 3 be a measurable function in C 1 ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) such that

A n ( D ) F n = F n , F n ( 0 , x ) = A n ( D ) f 0 ( x )

and

( E 1 ) t F n + k = 1 3 ν k D k 2 r k F n + A n ( D ) div ( F n F n ) + α F n + β A n ( D ) [ F n 2 F n ] = 0 , ( E 2 ) F n ( t ) L 2 2 + 2 k = 1 3 ν k t 1 t 2 D k r k F n L 2 2 + 2 α 0 t F n L 2 2 + 2 β 0 t F n L 4 4 f 0 L 2 2 .

Then, for every ε > 0 , there is δ = δ ( ε , α , β , f 0 L 2 ) > 0 such that for all t 1 , t 2 R + , we have

(3.1) ( t 2 t 1 < δ F n ( t 2 ) F n ( t 1 ) H s 0 < ε ) , n N ,

with s 0 = max { 3 , 2 max 1 i 3 r i } .

Proof

This proof is inspired from [5]-Proposition 3.1. Integrating ( E 1 ) on the interval [ t 1 , t 2 ] R + and taking the inner product in H s 0 , we obtain

F n ( t 2 ) F n ( t 1 ) H s 0 I 1 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) + I 2 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) + I 3 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) + I 4 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) ,

with

I 1 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) = k = 1 3 ν k t 1 t 2 D k 2 r k F n H s 0 , I 2 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) = t 1 t 2 A n ( D ) div ( F n F n ) H s 0 , I 3 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) = α t 1 t 2 F n H s 0 , I 4 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) = β t 1 t 2 A n ( D ) [ F n 2 F n ] H s 0 .

Let ε > 0 be a positive real, let us find a positive real δ > 0 such that if t 2 t 1 < δ , we obtain

I k , n < ε 4 , k = { 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 } .

To estimate I 1 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) , we write

I 1 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) = k = 1 3 ν k t 1 t 2 D k 2 r k F n H s 0 k = 1 3 ν k t 1 t 2 F n H 2 r k s 0 k = 1 3 ν k t 1 t 2 F n ( τ ) H 0 d τ k = 1 3 ν k t 1 t 2 F n ( τ ) L 2 d τ k = 1 3 ν k f 0 L 2 ( t 2 t 1 ) .

Then, if t 2 t 1 < δ 1 = ε 4 k = 1 3 ν k f 0 L 2 + 4 , we obtain

I 1 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) < ε 4 .

To estimate I 2 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) , from Lemma (2.3), we have

I 2 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) = t 1 t 2 A n ( D ) div ( F n F n ) H s 0 t 1 t 2 div ( F n F n ) ( τ ) H 3 d τ t 1 t 2 ( F n F n ) ( τ ) H 2 d τ σ 2 , 3 t 1 t 2 ( F n F n ) ( τ ) L 1 d τ σ 2 , 3 t 1 t 2 F n ( τ ) L 2 2 d τ σ 2 , 3 f 0 L 2 2 ( t 2 t 1 ) .

Then, if t 2 t 1 < δ 2 = ε 4 σ 2 , 3 f 0 L 2 2 + 4 , we obtain

I 2 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) < ε 4 .

To estimate I 3 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) , we write

I 3 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) = α t 1 t 2 F n H s 0 α t 1 t 2 F n ( τ ) H 0 d τ α t 1 t 2 F n ( τ ) L 2 d τ α t 1 t 2 F n ( τ ) L 2 d τ α f 0 L 2 ( t 2 t 1 ) .

Then, if t 2 t 1 < δ 3 = ε 4 α f 0 L 2 + 4 , we obtain

I 3 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) < ε 4 .

To estimate I 4 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) , from Lemma (2.3), we have

I 4 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) β t 1 t 2 A n ( D ) [ F n 2 F n ] H 3 σ 3 , 3 β t 1 t 2 ( F n 2 F n ) ( τ ) L 1 d τ .

Now, for ( n , R , t ) N × ( 0 , + ) × [ 0 , + ) , we consider the following subset of R 3 :

X n ( R , t ) = { x R 3 F n ( t , x ) R } ,

I 4 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) σ 3 , 3 β t 1 t 2 X n ( R , t ) F n ( τ , x ) 3 d x d τ + σ 3 , 3 β t 1 t 2 X n ( R , t ) c F n ( τ , x ) 3 d x d τ σ 3 , 3 β t 1 t 2 X n ( R , t ) R F n ( τ , x ) 2 d x d τ + σ 3 , 3 β t 1 t 2 X n ( R , t ) c F n ( τ , x ) 4 R d x d τ σ 3 , 3 β R t 1 t 2 X n ( R , t ) F n ( τ , x ) 2 d x d τ + σ 3 , 3 β R t 1 t 2 X n ( R , t ) c F n ( τ , x ) 4 d x d τ σ 3 , 3 β R t 1 t 2 F n ( τ ) L 2 2 d τ + σ 3 , 3 β R t 1 t 2 F n ( τ ) L 4 4 d τ .

Using ( E 2 ) , we obtain

I 4 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) σ 3 , 3 β R f 0 L 2 2 ( t 2 t 1 ) + σ 3 , 3 β 2 α R f 0 L 2 2 .

Hence, with the choices R = R ε = 4 σ 3 , 3 f 0 L 2 2 + 4 ε and δ 4 = ε 8 α σ 3 , 3 β f 0 2 L 2 2 + 8 , we obtain

t 2 t 1 < δ 4 I 4 , n ( t 1 , t 2 ) < ε 4 .

To conclude, it suffices to take δ = min { δ 1 , δ 2 , δ 3 , δ 4 } .□

3.2 Step 2

In this step, we construct a global solution of ( S ) , where we use a method inspired by [12]. For this, consider the approximate system with the parameter n N :

( S n ) t u μ Δ J n u + J n ( J n u J n u ) + α J n u + β J n [ J n u 2 J n u ] = P n , in R + × R 3 P n = ( Δ ) 1 ( div J n ( J n u J n u + β div J n [ J n u 2 J n u ] ) ) div u = 0 , in R + × R 3 , u ( 0 , x ) = J n u 0 ( x ) , in R 3 .

  • By the Cauchy-Lipschitz theorem, we obtain a unique solution u n C 1 ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) of ( S n ) , with the following properties:

    div u n = 0 , J n u n = u n .

    Moreover, u n satisfies

    t u n μ Δ u n + J n ( u n . u n ) + α u n + β J n [ u n 2 u n ] = p n , in R + × R 3 , p n = ( Δ ) 1 ( div J n ( u n . u n + β div J n [ u n 2 u n ] ) ) , div u n = 0 , in R + × R 3 , u n ( 0 , x ) = J n u 0 ( x ) , in R 3 .

    and the following energy estimate

    (3.2) u n ( t ) L 2 2 + 2 μ 0 t u n L 2 2 + 2 α 0 t u n L 2 2 + 2 β 0 t u n L 4 4 u 0 L 2 2 , t 0 ,

    (3.3) e 2 α t u n ( t ) L 2 2 + 2 μ 0 t e 2 α z u n ( z ) L 2 2 d z + 2 β 0 t e 2 α z u n ( z ) L 4 4 d z u 0 L 2 2 , t 0 .

  • By Inequality (3.2), we obtain ( u n ) that is bounded in

    L ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) L l o c 2 ( R + , H 1 ( R 3 ) ) L 2 ( R + , H ˙ 1 ( R 3 ) ) L 4 ( R + , L 4 ( R 3 ) ) .

    Using Proposition 3.1, we deduce that

    (3.4) the sequence ( u n ) is equicontinuous in C b ( R + , H 1 ( R 3 ) ) .

  • Let ( T q ) q ( 0 , ) N such that T q < T q + 1 and T q as q . Let ( θ q ) q N be a sequence in C 0 ( R 3 ) such that: for all q N ,

    θ q ( x ) = 1 , x B 0 , q + 1 + 1 4 , θ q ( x ) = 0 , x B ( 0 , q + 2 ) c , 0 θ q 1 .

    Using (3.2)–(3.4) and classical argument by combining Ascoli’s theorem and the Cantor diagonal process, we obtain a nondecreasing φ : N N and

    u L ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) C ( R + , H 3 ( R 3 ) ) L 2 ( R + , H ˙ 1 ( R 3 ) ) L 4 ( R + , L 4 ( R 3 ) ) ,

    such that for all q N , we have

    (3.5) lim n θ q ( u φ ( n ) u ) L ( [ 0 , T q ] , H 4 ) = 0 .

    Combining the aforementioned inequalities, we obtain (1.1) and (1.2).

  • It remains to show that u is a solution of system ( S ) . Using the same idea in [5], we prove that u satisfies

    t u μ Δ u + u u + α u + β u 2 u = p , in D ( R + × R 3 ) .

    Then, u is a solution of our system ( S ) .

3.3 Continuity of the solution in L 2 ( R 3 )

  • By Inequality (1.1), we have

    limsup t 0 u ( t ) L 2 u 0 L 2 .

    Then, Proposition 2.1 implies that

    limsup t 0 u ( t ) u 0 L 2 = 0 .

    This ensures the continuity of the solution u at 0.

  • To prove the continuity on ( 0 , ) , consider the function

    v n , ε ( t ) = u φ ( n ) ( t + ε ) , p n , ε ( t ) = p φ ( n ) ( t + ε ) , for n N and ε > 0 .

    We have

    t u φ ( n ) μ Δ u φ ( n ) + J φ ( n ) ( u φ ( n ) u φ ( n ) ) + α u φ ( n ) + β J φ ( n ) ( u φ ( n ) 2 u φ ( n ) ) + p φ ( n ) = 0 , t v n , ε μ Δ v n , ε + J φ ( n ) ( v n , ε v n , ε ) + α v n , ε + β J φ ( n ) ( v n , ε 2 v n , ε ) + p n , ε = 0 .

    The function w n , ε = u φ ( n ) v n , ε fulfills the following:

    t w n , ε μ Δ w n , ε + α w n , ε + β J φ ( n ) ( u φ ( n ) 2 u φ ( n ) v n , ε 2 v n , ε ) + ( p φ ( n ) p n , ε ) = J φ ( n ) ( w n , ε w n , ε ) J φ ( n ) ( w n , ε u φ ( n ) ) J φ ( n ) ( u φ ( n ) w n , ε ) .

    Taking the scalar product with w n , ε in L 2 ( R 3 ) and using the fact that w n , ε w n , ε ; w n , ε = 0 and div w n , ε = 0 , we obtain

    (3.6) 1 2 w n , ε ( t ) L 2 2 + μ w n , ε ( t ) L 2 2 + α w n , ε ( t ) L 2 2 + β J φ ( n ) ( u φ ( n ) 2 u φ ( n ) v n , ε 2 v n , ε ) ; w n , ε L 2 = J φ ( n ) ( w n , ε u φ ( n ) ) ; w n , ε L 2 .

    From Lemma 2.2, we have

    J φ ( n ) ( u φ ( n ) 2 u φ ( n ) v n , ε 2 v n , ε ) ; w n , ε L 2 = ( u φ ( n ) 2 u φ ( n ) v n , ε 2 v n , ε ) ; J φ ( n ) w n , ε L 2 = ( u φ ( n ) 2 u φ ( n ) v n , ε 2 v n , ε ) ; w n , ε L 2 1 2 R 3 ( u φ ( n ) 2 + v n , ε 2 ) w n , ε 2 ,

    which implies

    (3.7) β J φ ( n ) ( u φ ( n ) 2 u φ ( n ) v n , ε 2 v n , ε ) ; w n , ε L 2 β 2 R 3 ( u φ ( n ) 2 + v n , ε 2 ) w n , ε 2 .

    Taking into account the equality

    I n , ε = J φ ( n ) ( w n , ε u φ ( n ) ) ; w n , ε L 2 = J φ ( n ) ( w n , ε v n , ε ) ; w n , ε L 2

    and, combining the Cauchy-Schwarz and Young’s inequalities, we obtain, for f = v n , ε or f = u φ ( n ) ,

    (3.8) J φ ( n ) ( w n , ε f ) ; w n , ε L 2 R 3 w n , ε f w n , ε = R 3 w n , ε 2 f 2 1 2 R 3 w n , ε 2 1 2 β R 3 w n , ε 2 f 2 + 1 4 β w n , ε L 2 2 .

    This inequality is true for f = v n , ε and f = u φ ( n ) , then using the elementary inequality

    min ( a , b ) 1 2 ( a + b ) ,

    with a = R 3 w n , ε 2 v n , ε 2 and b = R 3 w n , ε 2 u φ ( n ) 2 , we obtain

    I n , ε β 2 R 3 w n , ε 2 ( v n , ε 2 + u φ ( n ) 2 ) + 1 4 β w n , ε L 2 2 .

    Combining Inequalities (3.7) and (3.8), we deduce that

    (3.9) 1 2 d d t w n , ε ( t ) L 2 2 + μ 1 4 β w n , ε ( t ) L 2 2 + α w n , ε ( t ) L 2 2 0 .

    We have

    1 2 d d t w n , ε ( t ) L 2 2 + μ 1 4 β w n , ε ( t ) L 2 2 0 .

    Hence, we obtain

    w n , ε ( t ) L 2 2 w n , ε ( 0 ) L 2 2

    and

    u φ ( n ) ( t + ε ) u φ ( n ) ( t ) L 2 2 u φ ( n ) ( ε ) u φ ( n ) ( 0 ) L 2 2 .

    For t 0 > 0 and ε ( 0 , t 0 2 ) , we have

    u φ ( n ) ( t 0 + ε ) u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ) L 2 2 u φ ( n ) ( ε ) u φ ( n ) ( 0 ) L 2 2 , u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ε ) u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ) L 2 2 u φ ( n ) ( ε ) u φ ( n ) ( 0 ) L 2 2 .

    Thus,

    u φ ( n ) ( ε ) u φ ( n ) ( 0 ) L 2 2 = J φ ( n ) u φ ( n ) ( ε ) J φ ( n ) u φ ( n ) ( 0 ) L 2 2 = J φ ( n ) ( u φ ( n ) ( ε ) u 0 ) L 2 2 u φ ( n ) ( ε ) u 0 L 2 2 u φ ( n ) ( ε ) L 2 2 + u 0 L 2 2 2 Re u φ ( n ) ( ε ) ; u 0 L 2 2 u 0 L 2 2 2 Re u φ ( n ) ( ε ) ; u 0 .

    Since liminf n u φ ( n ) ( ε ) ; u 0 L 2 = u ( ε ) ; u 0 L 2 ,

    liminf n u φ ( n ) ( ε ) u φ ( n ) ( 0 ) L 2 2 2 u 0 L 2 2 2 Re u ( ε ) ; u 0 L 2 .

    Moreover, for all q , N N ,

    J N ( θ q ( u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ± ε ) u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ) ) ) L 2 2 θ q ( u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ± ε ) u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ) ) L 2 2 u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ± ε ) u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ) L 2 2 .

    For q big enough using (3.5), we obtain

    J N ( θ q ( u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ± ε ) u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ) ) ) L 2 2 liminf n u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ± ε ) u φ ( n ) ( 0 ) L 2 2 .

    Then,

    J N ( θ q ( u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ± ε ) u φ ( n ) ( t 0 ) ) ) L 2 2 2 ( u 0 L 2 2 Re u ( ε ) ; u 0 L 2 ) .

    By applying the Monotone convergence theorem in the order N and q , we obtain

    u ( t 0 ± ε ) u ( t 0 ) L 2 2 2 ( u 0 L 2 2 Re u ( ε ) ; u 0 L 2 ) .

    Using the continuity at 0 and make ε 0 , we obtain the continuity at t 0 .

3.4 Uniqueness of u in L 2 ( R 3 )

Let u and v be two solutions of ( S ) in the space

C ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) L 2 ( R + , H 1 ( R 3 ) ) L 4 ( R + , L 4 ( R 3 ) ) .

Set w = u v . Then, the function w satisfies the following:

t w μ Δ w + α w + β ( u 2 u v 2 v ) + ( p u p v ) = w w w u u w .

Taking the scalar product in L 2 with w , we obtain

1 2 d d t w L 2 2 + μ w L 2 2 + α w L 2 2 + β ( u 2 u v 2 v ) ; w L 2 = w u ; w L 2 .

By adapting the same method for the proof of the continuity of such solution in L 2 ( R 3 ) , with u , v , and w instead of u φ ( n ) , v n , ε , and w n , ε in order, we find

β ( u 2 u v 2 v ) ; w L 2 β 2 R 3 ( u 2 + v 2 ) w 2

and

w u ; w L 2 = w v ; w L 2 β R 3 w 2 u 2 + 1 4 β w L 2 2 β R 3 w 2 v 2 + 1 4 β w L 2 2 β 2 min R 3 w 2 u 2 , R 3 w 2 v 2 + 1 4 β w L 2 2 β 2 R 3 w 2 ( u 2 + v 2 ) + 1 4 β w L 2 2 .

Combining the aforementioned inequalities, we find the following energy estimate:

1 2 d d t w L 2 2 + μ 1 4 β w L 2 2 + α w L 2 2 0 .

Using the fact μ 1 4 β 0 and α > 0 , we obtain

w ( t ) L 2 2 w 0 L 2 2 .

As w 0 = 0 , then w = 0 and u = v , which implies the uniqueness. And the proof of Theorem 1.1 is completed.

4 Proof of Theorem (1.2)

Let χ C 0 ( R 3 ) be a regular function, such that

0 χ 1 , χ = 1 , on B ( 0 , 1 ) , χ = 0 , on B ( 0 , 2 ) c .

Also, for δ > 0 , put the following functions χ δ and ψ δ defined by

χ δ ( ξ ) = χ ( δ ξ ) , ψ δ = 1 ( χ δ ) .

We have

ψ δ L 1 = ψ 1 L 1 , δ > 0 .

In addition, we define the operator S δ by

S δ ( f ) = χ δ ( D ) f = ψ δ f .

For δ > 0 , which will be fixed later, put the following functions:

v δ = ψ δ u = 1 ( χ δ ( ξ ) u ^ ) , w δ = u v δ = 1 ( ( 1 χ δ ( ξ ) ) u ^ ) .

Let ε > 0 be a fixed real.

  • Estimate of v δ : We have

    (4.1) e 2 α t v δ ( t ) L 2 2 + 2 μ 0 t e 2 α z v δ ( z ) L 2 2 d z A δ ( t ) + B δ ( t ) ,

    where

    A δ ( t ) = 2 0 t e 2 α z S δ ( u u ) ( z ) ; v δ ( z ) L 2 d z , B δ ( t ) = 2 β 0 t e 2 α z S δ ( u 2 u ) ( z ) ; v δ ( z ) L 2 d z .

    To estimate A δ , we write

    A δ ( t ) = 0 t e 2 α z S δ ( u u ) ( z ) ; v δ ( z ) L 2 d z 0 t e 2 α z S δ ( u u ) ( z ) L 2 v δ ( z ) L 2 d z c 0 0 t e 2 α z ξ < 2 δ ξ 2 ( u u ) ( z , ξ ) 2 d ξ 1 2 v δ ( z ) L 2 d z 2 c 0 δ 1 2 0 t e 2 α z ξ < δ ξ ( u u ) ( z , ξ ) 2 d ξ 1 2 v δ ( z ) L 2 d z 2 c 0 δ 1 2 0 t e 2 α z ( u u ) ( z ) H ˙ 1 2 v δ ( z ) L 2 d z C δ 1 2 0 t e 2 α z u ( z ) L 2 2 v δ ( z ) L 2 d z .

    Then,

    (4.2) A δ ( t ) C δ 1 2 u 0 L 2 3 t 0 .

    To estimate B δ , by the Hölder inequality, we obtain

    B δ ( t ) = 0 t e 2 α z S δ ( u 2 u ) ( z ) ; v δ ( z ) L 2 d z 0 t e 2 α z S δ ( u 2 u ) ( z ) L 4 3 v δ ( z ) L 4 d z 0 t e 2 α z ψ δ ( u 2 u ) ( z ) L 4 3 v δ ( z ) L 4 d z 0 t e 2 α z ψ δ L 1 ( u 2 u ) ( z ) L 4 3 v δ ( z ) L 4 d z ψ 1 L 1 0 t e 2 α z ( u 2 u ) ( z ) L 4 3 v δ ( z ) L 4 d z ψ 1 L 1 0 e 2 α z u ( z ) L 4 3 v δ ( z ) L 4 d z ψ 1 L 1 0 e 2 α z u ( z ) L 4 4 d z 3 4 0 e 2 α z v δ ( z ) L 4 4 d z 1 4 .

    Using (1.2), we obtain

    B δ ( t ) ψ 1 L 1 u 0 L 2 2 2 β 3 4 0 e 2 α z v δ ( z ) L 4 4 d z 1 4 .

    By interpolation, we obtain

    v δ ( z ) L 4 4 C v δ ( z ) L 2 v δ ( z ) L 2 3 2 C δ v δ ( z ) L 2 2 v δ ( z ) L 2 2 2 C δ u 0 L 2 2 v δ ( z ) L 2 2 2 C δ u 0 L 2 2 u ( z ) L 2 2 .

    Then,

    0 e 2 α z v δ ( z ) L 4 4 d z 2 C δ u 0 L 2 2 0 e 2 α z u ( z ) L 2 2 d z C μ 1 u 0 L 2 4 δ

    and

    (4.3) B δ ( t ) ψ 1 L 1 u 0 L 2 2 2 β 3 4 ( C μ 1 ) 1 4 u 0 L 2 δ 1 4 .

    Combining Inequalities (4.1)–(4.3), we obtain

    e 2 α t v δ ( t ) L 2 2 C ( u 0 ) δ 1 4 ( 1 + δ 1 4 ) ,

    which implies the existence of δ 0 > 0 , such that

    (4.4) sup t 0 e 2 α t v δ ( t ) L 2 2 < ( ε 2 ) 2 , δ ( 0 , δ 0 ] .

  • Prove that w δ 0 L 2 ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) . We have

    0 e 2 α t w δ 0 ( t ) L 2 2 d t = c 0 0 e 2 α z w ^ δ 0 ( t ) L 2 2 d t = c 0 0 ξ > δ 0 e 2 α z u ^ ( t , ξ ) 2 d ξ d t c 0 δ 0 2 0 e 2 α z ξ > δ 0 ξ 2 u ^ ( t , ξ ) 2 d ξ d t c 0 δ 0 2 0 e 2 α z u ^ ( t ) L 2 2 d t δ 0 2 0 e 2 α z u ( t ) L 2 2 d t 2 μ 1 δ 0 2 u 0 L 2 2 .

    Then, ( t e 2 α t w δ 0 ( t ) L 2 2 ) C ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) L 2 ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) .

    Put the following subset of R + :

    F ε = { t 0 : e 2 α t w δ 0 ( t ) L 2 2 ( ε 2 ) 2 } .

    As ( t e 2 α t w δ 0 ( t ) L 2 2 ) C ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) L 2 ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) , then there exists t ε R + \ F ε such that

    (4.5) e 2 α t ε w δ 0 ( t ε ) L 2 2 < ( ε 2 ) 2 .

  • Combining (4.4)–(4.5), we obtain

    (4.6) e 2 α t ε u ( t ε ) L 2 < ε .

  • Now, put the following system:

    ( S ) t f μ Δ f + f f + α f + β f 2 f + q = 0 in R + × R 3 div f = 0 in R + × R 3 f ( 0 , x ) = u ( t ε , x ) in R 3 .

    By the first step, there is a unique solution f ε C b ( R + , L 2 ( R 3 ) ) L 2 ( R + , H 1 ( R 3 ) ) L 4 ( R + , L 4 ( R 3 ) ) of (2) satisfying for all t 0 :

    e 2 α t f ε ( t ) L 2 2 + 2 μ 0 t e 2 α z f ε ( z ) L 2 2 d z + 2 β 0 t e 2 α z f ε ( z ) L 4 4 d z u ( t ε ) L 2 2 .

    The uniqueness of the solution implies that f ( t ) = u ( t ε + t ) for all t 0 and

    e 2 α t u ( t ε + t ) L 2 2 u ( t ε ) L 2 2 ,

    which implies that

    e 2 α t u ( t ) L 2 2 e 2 α t ε u ( t ε ) L 2 2 < ε 2 , t t ε .

    Then, the proof of Theorem 1.2 is completed.

5 Conclusion

This work deals with a detailed study of the global existence, uniqueness, and continuity for the solution of incompressible convective Brinkman-Forchheimer on the whole space R 3 when 4 μ β 1 . An asymptotic type of convergence of the global solution associated with the aforementioned problem is also established.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) for supporting and supervising this project.

  1. Funding information: The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research through the Project Number IFP-IMSIU-2023018.

  2. Author contributions: All authors contributed equally in this work. All authors have accepted responsibility for entire content of the manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.

  5. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to the article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during this study.

References

[1] A. V. Shenoy, Non-Newtonian fluid heat transfer in porous media, Adv. Heat Transfer 24 (1994), 101–190. 10.1016/S0065-2717(08)70233-8Search in Google Scholar

[2] R. G. Gordeev, The existence of a periodic solution in a certain problem of tidal dynamics. In: Problems of Mathematical Analysis, No. 4: Integral and Differential Operators. Differential equations (Russian), Izdat. Leningrad. Univ., Leningrad, 1973. Search in Google Scholar

[3] A. L. Likhtarnikov, Existence and stability of bounded and periodic solutions in a nonlinear problem of tidal dynamics. In The Direct Method in the Theory of Stability and its Applications (Irkutsk, 1979), “Nauka” Sibirsk. Otdel., Novosibirsk, vol. 276, 1981, pp. 83–91. Search in Google Scholar

[4] X. Cai and Q. Jiu, Weak and strong solutions for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with damping, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 343 (2008), no. 2, 799–809. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.01.041Search in Google Scholar

[5] J. Benameur, Global weak solution of 3D-NSE with exponential damping, Open Mathematics 20 (2022), 590–607. 10.1515/math-2022-0050Search in Google Scholar

[6] M. Jleli, B. Samet, and D. Ye, Critical criteria of Fujita type for a system of inhomogeneous wave inequalities in exterior domains, J. Differential Equations 268 (2020), no. 6, 3035–3056. 10.1016/j.jde.2019.09.051Search in Google Scholar

[7] M. Jleli and B. Samet, New blow-up results for nonlinear boundary value problems in exterior domains, Nonlinear Analysis. 178 (2019), 348–365. 10.1016/j.na.2018.09.003Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Jleli, M. A. Ragusa, and B. Samet, Nonlinear Liouville-type theorems for generalized Baouendi-Grushin operator on Riemannian manifolds, Adv. Differential Equations 28 (2023), no. 1/2, 143–168. 10.57262/ade028-0102-143Search in Google Scholar

[9] H. Brezis, Analyse Fonctionnelle, Théorie et Applications, Masson, Paris, 1996. Search in Google Scholar

[10] H. Bahouri, J. Y Chemin, and R. Danchin, Fourier Analysis and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, Springer Verlag, Berlin, vol. 343, 2011. 10.1007/978-3-642-16830-7Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. Blel and J. Benameur, Long time decay of Leray solution of 3D-NSE with exponential damping, Fractals 30 (2022), 10. 10.1142/S0218348X22402368Search in Google Scholar

[12] J.-Y. Chemin, About Navier-Stokes Equations, Publications of Jaques-Louis Lions Laboratoiry, Paris VI University, 1996. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-11-03
Revised: 2024-02-02
Accepted: 2024-03-19
Published Online: 2024-08-06

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. On the p-fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff equations with electromagnetic fields and the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev nonlinearity
  3. L-Fuzzy fixed point results in -metric spaces with applications
  4. Solutions of a coupled system of hybrid boundary value problems with Riesz-Caputo derivative
  5. Nonparametric methods of statistical inference for double-censored data with applications
  6. LADM procedure to find the analytical solutions of the nonlinear fractional dynamics of partial integro-differential equations
  7. Existence of projected solutions for quasi-variational hemivariational inequality
  8. Spectral collocation method for convection-diffusion equation
  9. New local fractional Hermite-Hadamard-type and Ostrowski-type inequalities with generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel for generalized h-preinvex functions
  10. On the asymptotics of eigenvalues for a Sturm-Liouville problem with symmetric single-well potential
  11. On exact rate of convergence of row sequences of multipoint Hermite-Padé approximants
  12. The essential norm of bounded diagonal infinite matrices acting on Banach sequence spaces
  13. Decay rate of the solutions to the Cauchy problem of the Lord Shulman thermoelastic Timoshenko model with distributed delay
  14. Enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of two uniformly convergent numerical solvers for singularly perturbed parabolic convection–diffusion–reaction problems with two small parameters
  15. An inertial shrinking projection self-adaptive algorithm for solving split variational inclusion problems and fixed point problems in Banach spaces
  16. An equation for complex fractional diffusion created by the Struve function with a T-symmetric univalent solution
  17. On the existence and Ulam-Hyers stability for implicit fractional differential equation via fractional integral-type boundary conditions
  18. Some properties of a class of holomorphic functions associated with tangent function
  19. The existence of multiple solutions for a class of upper critical Choquard equation in a bounded domain
  20. On the continuity in q of the family of the limit q-Durrmeyer operators
  21. Results on solutions of several systems of the product type complex partial differential difference equations
  22. On Berezin norm and Berezin number inequalities for sum of operators
  23. Geometric invariants properties of osculating curves under conformal transformation in Euclidean space ℝ3
  24. On a generalization of the Opial inequality
  25. A novel numerical approach to solutions of fractional Bagley-Torvik equation fitted with a fractional integral boundary condition
  26. Holomorphic curves into projective spaces with some special hypersurfaces
  27. On Periodic solutions for implicit nonlinear Caputo tempered fractional differential problems
  28. Approximation of complex q-Beta-Baskakov-Szász-Stancu operators in compact disk
  29. Existence and regularity of solutions for non-autonomous integrodifferential evolution equations involving nonlocal conditions
  30. Jordan left derivations in infinite matrix rings
  31. Nonlinear nonlocal elliptic problems in ℝ3: existence results and qualitative properties
  32. Invariant means and lacunary sequence spaces of order (α, β)
  33. Novel results for two families of multivalued dominated mappings satisfying generalized nonlinear contractive inequalities and applications
  34. Global in time well-posedness of a three-dimensional periodic regularized Boussinesq system
  35. Existence of solutions for nonlinear problems involving mixed fractional derivatives with p(x)-Laplacian operator
  36. Some applications and maximum principles for multi-term time-space fractional parabolic Monge-Ampère equation
  37. On three-dimensional q-Riordan arrays
  38. Some aspects of normal curve on smooth surface under isometry
  39. Mittag-Leffler-Hyers-Ulam stability for a first- and second-order nonlinear differential equations using Fourier transform
  40. Topological structure of the solution sets to non-autonomous evolution inclusions driven by measures on the half-line
  41. Remark on the Daugavet property for complex Banach spaces
  42. Decreasing and complete monotonicity of functions defined by derivatives of completely monotonic function involving trigamma function
  43. Uniqueness of meromorphic functions concerning small functions and derivatives-differences
  44. Asymptotic approximations of Apostol-Frobenius-Euler polynomials of order α in terms of hyperbolic functions
  45. Hyers-Ulam stability of Davison functional equation on restricted domains
  46. Involvement of three successive fractional derivatives in a system of pantograph equations and studying the existence solution and MLU stability
  47. Composition of some positive linear integral operators
  48. On bivariate fractal interpolation for countable data and associated nonlinear fractal operator
  49. Generalized result on the global existence of positive solutions for a parabolic reaction-diffusion model with an m × m diffusion matrix
  50. Online makespan minimization for MapReduce scheduling on multiple parallel machines
  51. The sequential Henstock-Kurzweil delta integral on time scales
  52. On a discrete version of Fejér inequality for α-convex sequences without symmetry condition
  53. Existence of three solutions for two quasilinear Laplacian systems on graphs
  54. Embeddings of anisotropic Sobolev spaces into spaces of anisotropic Hölder-continuous functions
  55. Nilpotent perturbations of m-isometric and m-symmetric tensor products of commuting d-tuples of operators
  56. Characterizations of transcendental entire solutions of trinomial partial differential-difference equations in ℂ2#
  57. Fractional Sturm-Liouville operators on compact star graphs
  58. Exact controllability for nonlinear thermoviscoelastic plate problem
  59. Improved modified gradient-based iterative algorithm and its relaxed version for the complex conjugate and transpose Sylvester matrix equations
  60. Superposition operator problems of Hölder-Lipschitz spaces
  61. A note on λ-analogue of Lah numbers and λ-analogue of r-Lah numbers
  62. Ground state solutions and multiple positive solutions for nonhomogeneous Kirchhoff equation with Berestycki-Lions type conditions
  63. A note on 1-semi-greedy bases in p-Banach spaces with 0 < p ≤ 1
  64. Fixed point results for generalized convex orbital Lipschitz operators
  65. Asymptotic model for the propagation of surface waves on a rotating magnetoelastic half-space
  66. Multiplicity of k-convex solutions for a singular k-Hessian system
  67. Poisson C*-algebra derivations in Poisson C*-algebras
  68. Signal recovery and polynomiographic visualization of modified Noor iteration of operators with property (E)
  69. Approximations to precisely localized supports of solutions for non-linear parabolic p-Laplacian problems
  70. Solving nonlinear fractional differential equations by common fixed point results for a pair of (α, Θ)-type contractions in metric spaces
  71. Pseudo compact almost automorphic solutions to a family of delay differential equations
  72. Periodic measures of fractional stochastic discrete wave equations with nonlinear noise
  73. Asymptotic study of a nonlinear elliptic boundary Steklov problem on a nanostructure
  74. Cramer's rule for a class of coupled Sylvester commutative quaternion matrix equations
  75. Quantitative estimates for perturbed sampling Kantorovich operators in Orlicz spaces
  76. Review Articles
  77. Penalty method for unilateral contact problem with Coulomb's friction in time-fractional derivatives
  78. Differential sandwich theorems for p-valent analytic functions associated with a generalization of the integral operator
  79. Special Issue on Development of Fuzzy Sets and Their Extensions - Part II
  80. Higher-order circular intuitionistic fuzzy time series forecasting methodology: Application of stock change index
  81. Binary relations applied to the fuzzy substructures of quantales under rough environment
  82. Algorithm selection model based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision in big data information mining
  83. A new machine learning approach based on spatial fuzzy data correlation for recognizing sports activities
  84. Benchmarking the efficiency of distribution warehouses using a four-phase integrated PCA-DEA-improved fuzzy SWARA-CoCoSo model for sustainable distribution
  85. Special Issue on Application of Fractional Calculus: Mathematical Modeling and Control - Part II
  86. A study on a type of degenerate poly-Dedekind sums
  87. Efficient scheme for a category of variable-order optimal control problems based on the sixth-kind Chebyshev polynomials
  88. Special Issue on Mathematics for Artificial intelligence and Artificial intelligence for Mathematics
  89. Toward automated hail disaster weather recognition based on spatio-temporal sequence of radar images
  90. The shortest-path and bee colony optimization algorithms for traffic control at single intersection with NetworkX application
  91. Neural network quaternion-based controller for port-Hamiltonian system
  92. Matching ontologies with kernel principle component analysis and evolutionary algorithm
  93. Survey on machine vision-based intelligent water quality monitoring techniques in water treatment plant: Fish activity behavior recognition-based schemes and applications
  94. Artificial intelligence-driven tone recognition of Guzheng: A linear prediction approach
  95. Transformer learning-based neural network algorithms for identification and detection of electronic bullying in social media
  96. Squirrel search algorithm-support vector machine: Assessing civil engineering budgeting course using an SSA-optimized SVM model
  97. Special Issue on International E-Conference on Mathematical and Statistical Sciences - Part I
  98. Some fixed point results on ultrametric spaces endowed with a graph
  99. On the generalized Mellin integral operators
  100. On existence and multiplicity of solutions for a biharmonic problem with weights via Ricceri's theorem
  101. Approximation process of a positive linear operator of hypergeometric type
  102. On Kantorovich variant of Brass-Stancu operators
  103. A higher-dimensional categorical perspective on 2-crossed modules
  104. Special Issue on Some Integral Inequalities, Integral Equations, and Applications - Part I
  105. On parameterized inequalities for fractional multiplicative integrals
  106. On inverse source term for heat equation with memory term
  107. On Fejér-type inequalities for generalized trigonometrically and hyperbolic k-convex functions
  108. New extensions related to Fejér-type inequalities for GA-convex functions
  109. Derivation of Hermite-Hadamard-Jensen-Mercer conticrete inequalities for Atangana-Baleanu fractional integrals by means of majorization
  110. Some Hardy's inequalities on conformable fractional calculus
  111. The novel quadratic phase Fourier S-transform and associated uncertainty principles in the quaternion setting
  112. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Fixed-Point Theory and Applications - Part I
  113. A novel iterative process for numerical reckoning of fixed points via generalized nonlinear mappings with qualitative study
  114. Some new fixed point theorems of α-partially nonexpansive mappings
  115. Generalized Yosida inclusion problem involving multi-valued operator with XOR operation
  116. Periodic and fixed points for mappings in extended b-gauge spaces equipped with a graph
  117. Convergence of Peaceman-Rachford splitting method with Bregman distance for three-block nonconvex nonseparable optimization
  118. Topological structure of the solution sets to neutral evolution inclusions driven by measures
  119. (α, F)-Geraghty-type generalized F-contractions on non-Archimedean fuzzy metric-unlike spaces
  120. Solvability of infinite system of integral equations of Hammerstein type in three variables in tempering sequence spaces c 0 β and 1 β
  121. Special Issue on Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Their Applications - Part I
  122. Fuzzy fractional delay integro-differential equation with the generalized Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative
  123. Klein-Gordon potential in characteristic coordinates
  124. Asymptotic analysis of Leray solution for the incompressible NSE with damping
  125. Special Issue on Blow-up Phenomena in Nonlinear Equations of Mathematical Physics - Part I
  126. Long time decay of incompressible convective Brinkman-Forchheimer in L2(ℝ3)
  127. Numerical solution of general order Emden-Fowler-type Pantograph delay differential equations
  128. Global smooth solution to the n-dimensional liquid crystal equations with fractional dissipation
  129. Spectral properties for a system of Dirac equations with nonlinear dependence on the spectral parameter
  130. A memory-type thermoelastic laminated beam with structural damping and microtemperature effects: Well-posedness and general decay
  131. The asymptotic behavior for the Navier-Stokes-Voigt-Brinkman-Forchheimer equations with memory and Tresca friction in a thin domain
  132. Absence of global solutions to wave equations with structural damping and nonlinear memory
  133. Special Issue on Differential Equations and Numerical Analysis - Part I
  134. Vanishing viscosity limit for a one-dimensional viscous conservation law in the presence of two noninteracting shocks
  135. Limiting dynamics for stochastic complex Ginzburg-Landau systems with time-varying delays on unbounded thin domains
  136. A comparison of two nonconforming finite element methods for linear three-field poroelasticity
Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dema-2024-0013/html
Scroll to top button