Home Solvability of infinite system of integral equations of Hammerstein type in three variables in tempering sequence spaces c 0 β and ℓ 1 β
Article Open Access

Solvability of infinite system of integral equations of Hammerstein type in three variables in tempering sequence spaces c 0 β and 1 β

  • Mesia Simbeye , Santosh Kumar EMAIL logo and M. Mursaleen
Published/Copyright: September 26, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine the criteria under which the infinite system of integral equations in three variables has a solution in the Banach tempering sequence space c 0 β and 1 β , utilizing the Meir-Keeler condensing operators. Our research builds upon the findings of Malik and Jalal. Furthermore, we provide illustrative examples to demonstrate the implications of our established conditions.

MSC 2010: 47H08; 47G15; 47H10

1 Introduction and preliminaries

The study of functional integral equations is an important branch of non-linear analysis and has various applications in natural and applied sciences. Most of the problems, for instance, in mechanics and population dynamics can be formulated using integral equations. On the other hand, differential equations may be converted into integral equations and their solutions can be obtained.

The topic of solutions to functional equations has captured the attention of numerous researchers over an extensive period of time. Several approaches have been used to establish the existence of solutions of functional equations such as functional integral equations, differential equations, integro-differential equations, and fractional integro-differential equations [14].

Measures of non-compactness are important tool in fixed point theory, which is also crucial in the study of existence of solution of functional equations.

In 1930, Kuratowski [5] introduced the concept of measures of non-compactness, a function that determines the degree of non-compactness of a set. Later on, Banaś [6] generalized this concept into Banach space. In 1955, Darbo [7] used the Kuratowski measure of non-compactness to prove his famous fixed point theorem, which was a generalization of the classical Schauder’s fixed point theorem and Banach’s contraction principle. Darbo’s fixed point theorem and it is several generalizations such as Meir-Keeler fixed point theorem are used by many researchers to study the existence of solutions of integral equations and differential equations in Banach spaces.

The study of sequence spaces has also attracted the interest of many researchers. Kreyszig [8] has shown some sequence spaces, which are also Banach spaces in his book titled introductory functional analysis with applications. Banaś and Mursaleen [9] discussed measures of non-compactness in some classical sequence spaces. Recently, several studies have been conducted on the investigation of the solvability of functional integral equations in some Banach sequence spaces. We can refer [1013] for some works on existence of solutions of functional integral equations in Banach sequence spaces. This work extends and generalizes the results of Malik and Jalal [10] in tempered sequence spaces c 0 β and 1 β .

Sometimes it is not suitable to consider the classical sequence spaces for studying the solvability of functional equations such as initial value differential equations and integral equations, since the solution might be out of such sequences. Therefore, it is important to consider the enlarged sequence spaces.

These spaces are defined by fixing a non-increasing sequence β = β n , where β n is a real positive sequence for n N . Such sequence β will be called the tempering sequence.

Let ω denote all sequences y = ( y k ) k = 1 real or complex such that β n y n 0 as n . We denote this sequence space by c 0 β . It is a Banach space under the norm

y c 0 β = ( y n ) c 0 β = sup { β n y n : n N } .

In a similar manner, we examine the space 1 β , which encompasses real (or complex) sequences ( y n ) with the property that ( β n y n ) converges to a finite value. This particular space is a Banach space, characterized by the norm

y 1 β = y n 1 β = n = 1 β n y n .

Banaś and Krajewska [2], proved that the pairs of Banach sequence spaces ( c 0 , c 0 β ) and ( 1 , 1 β ) are isometric. It is important to note that if we let β n = 1 , then we have c 0 β = c 0 and 1 β = 1 . In order to obtain the enlarged sequence spaces c 0 β and 1 β , we assume that the sequence β n 0 as n .

In this research article, we will investigate the existence of solutions for an infinite system of integral equations with a Hammerstein-type structure in three variables of the form

(1) x n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + s t s t s t K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 ,

where ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) [ s , t ] × [ s , t ] × [ s , t ] .

Consider R + = [ 0 , ) , and suppose that ( M , . ) is a real Banach space. If X is a non-empty subset of M , we use X ¯ and ConvX to represent the closure and convex closure of X , respectively. The family of all non-empty and bounded subsets of M is denoted as Q M , and its subfamily consisting of all relatively compact sets is denoted as N M . The space of continuously differentiable functions on I 3 = [ s , t ] × [ s , t ] × [ s , t ] is denoted as C 1 ( I 3 , R ) .

In this article, the Hausdorff measure of non-compactness will be used to establish our results on the existence of solutions of a system of integral equations of Hammerstein type in three variables.

Definition 1.1

[9] Let ( X , ρ ) be a metric space and Q be a bounded subset of X . Then, the Hausdorff measure of non-compactness also known as the χ -measure or ball measure of non-compactness of a set Q , denoted by χ ( Q ) , is defined as the infimum of the set of all reals ε > 0 such that Q can be covered by a finite number of balls with radii < ε , i.e.,

χ ( Q ) = inf ε > 0 : Q i = 1 n B ( x i , r i ) , x i X , r i < ε ( i = 1 , , n ) n N .

The following is the axiomatic definition of measures of non-compactness.

Definition 1.2

[9] A function λ : Q M R + is referred to as a measure of non-compactness when it fulfills the following conditions:

  1. the family ker λ = Y Q M : λ ( Y ) = 0 is non-empty and ker λ N M ,

  2. Y Z λ ( Y ) λ ( Z ) ,

  3. λ ( Y ¯ ) = λ ( Y ) ,

  4. λ ( Conv Y ) = λ ( Y ) ,

  5. λ ( k Y + ( 1 k ) Z ) k λ ( Y ) + ( 1 k ) λ ( Z ) for k [ 0 , 1 ] ,

  6. If ( Y n ) is a sequence of closed sets from Q M such that Y n + 1 Y n for n = 1 , 2 , 3 , and lim n λ ( Y n ) = 0 , then n = 1 Y n is non-empty.

If a measure of non-compactness satisfies the following additional conditions, then it is called a regular measure:

  1. λ ( Y 1 Y 2 ) = max { λ ( Y 1 ) , λ ( Y 2 ) } ,

  2. λ ( Y 1 + Y 2 ) λ ( Y 1 ) + λ ( Y 2 ) ,

  3. λ ( k Y ) = k λ ( Y ) ,

  4. ker λ = N M .

The family ker λ is said to be the kernel of measure λ .

The following results obtained by Darbo [7] have been very useful for proving the existence of solutions of functional equations.

Definition 1.3

Consider two Banach spaces, M 1 and M 2 , and let λ 1 and λ 2 be the arbitrary measures of non-compactness on M 1 and M 2 , respectively. An operator f from M 1 to M 2 is referred to as a ( λ 1 , λ 2 ) -condensing operator if it satisfies the conditions of continuity and λ 2 ( f ( D ) ) < λ 1 ( D ) for every set D M 1 with a compact closure.

Remark 1.1

If M 1 = M 2 and λ 1 = λ 2 = λ , then f is called a λ -condensing operator.

Theorem 1.1

[7] If H is a non-empty, closed, bounded, and convex subset of a Banach space M, and a continuous mapping f : H H satisfies the condition λ 2 ( f ( H ) ) < k λ 1 ( H ) with a constant k in the interval [ 0 , 1 ) , then there exists a fixed point of f in H.

In 1969, Meir and Keeler [14] proved a very interesting fixed point, which is also a generalization of Banach’s contraction principle and Schauder’s fixed point theorem. Later on, Aghajan and Mursaleen [1] generalized the concept of Meir-Keeler contractions to Banach spaces and came up with the following results:

Definition 1.4

[1] Consider a non-empty subset C of a Banach space M , and let λ be an arbitrary measure of non-compactness defined on M . We say that an operator T : C C is a Meir-Keeler condensing operator if given any ε > 0 , there exists δ > 0 such that

ε λ ( X ) < ε + δ λ ( T ( X ) ) < ε ,

for any bounded subset X of C .

Theorem 1.2

[1] Consider a non-empty subset C of a Banach space M, and let λ be an arbitrary measure of non-compactness defined on M. If we have a continuous and Meir-Keeler condensing operator T : C C , then T has at least one fixed point, and the set of all fixed points of T within C is a compact set.

2 Hausdorff measure of non-compactness in Banach spaces c 0 β and 1 β

Banaś and Mursaleen [9] established the formula for the Hausdorff measure of non-compactness in the classical sequence spaces c 0 and 1 in one variable. We can consider publications [2,10,12,13] for the formulas of measures of non-compactness in some sequence spaces. In this section, the Hausdorff measure of non-compactness in sequence spaces c 0 β and 1 β in three variables is formulated.

Let H be a bounded subset of the Banach space ( c 0 β , . c 0 β ), and the Hausdorff measure of non-compactness is given by

χ ( H ) = lim n { sup v ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) H ( max k n β k v k ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) } ,

where v ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = ( v j ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) j = 1 c 0 β for each ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 and H Q c 0 β .

The Hausdorff measure of non-compactness χ in the Banach space 1 β is defined as follows:

χ ( H ) = lim n sup v ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) H k = n β k v k ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ,

where v ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = ( v j ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) j = 1 1 β for each ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 and H Q 1 β .

We will prove the existence of solutions for the infinite system of integral equation (1) in Banach spaces c 0 β and 1 β using the concept of Meir-Keeler condensing operators and the Hausdorff measure of non-compactness.

3 Existence of solution in the space c 0 β

Assume that the following conditions are satisfied:

  1. The functions ( h i ) i = 1 defined on the set I 3 × R are continuous and have real values. The operator T : I 3 × c 0 β c 0 β is defined on the space I 3 × c 0 β as

    ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , x ) ( T x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = ( β 1 h 1 ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) , β 2 h 2 ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) , ) .

    The collection of functions { ( T x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) } ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 exhibits equicontinuity at all points in the space c 0 β . This means that for any given value of ε > 0 , there exists a corresponding δ > 0 such that

    x y c 0 β δ ( T x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ( T y ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) c 0 β ε .

  2. For each fixed ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 , x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) C 1 ( I 3 , c 0 β ) , the following inequality holds:

    h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) , x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) p n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + q n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) sup i n { β i v i } , n N ,

    where p i ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) and q i ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) represent the continuous real-valued functions defined on I 3 . Additionally, the sequence of functions ( q i ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) i N is uniformly bounded on I 3 , while the sequence of functions ( p i ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) i N uniformly converges on I 3 to a function that becomes identically zero on I 3 .

  3. The functions K n : I 6 R are continuous throughout the entire domain I 6 , where n belongs to the set of natural numbers N . Additionally, these functions K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) exhibit equicontinuity with respect to the variables ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) , meaning that for any ε > 0 , there exists a corresponding δ > 0 such that

    K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) K n ( ψ 1 ¯ , ψ 2 ¯ , ψ 3 ¯ , ς 1 ¯ , ς 2 ¯ , ς 3 ¯ ) < ε ,

    where ψ 1 ψ 1 ¯ < δ , ψ 2 ψ 2 ¯ < δ , and ψ 3 ψ 3 ¯ < δ , for all ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) I 3 . In addition to that the function sequence ( K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) is equibounded on the set I 3 , and there exists a constant

    K = sup { K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) : ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) , ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) I 3 , n N } < .

  4. r n : I 3 R is continuous; also, the sequence of functions ( r n ) uniformly converges to zero on I 3 . We define the finite constant as

    = sup { r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) : ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 , n N } .

    Considering condition ( i i ) , the following finite constants are defined:

    Q = sup { β n q n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) : ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 , n R } , P = sup { β n p n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) : ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 , n N } .

Theorem 3.1

Under assumptions ( i ) ( i v ) , the infinite system (1) has at least one solution x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = ( x i ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) i = 1 in c 0 β for fixed ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 , whenever ( t s ) 2 K Q < 1 .

Proof

First, an operator Q on the space C 1 ( I 3 , c 0 β ) is defined by

(2) ( Q x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = ( ( Q x ) n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) = r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + s t s t s t K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) β n h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 = r 1 ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + s t s t s t K 1 ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) β 1 h 1 ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x 1 ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) , x 2 ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) , ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 , r 2 ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + s t s t s t K 2 ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) β 2 h 2 ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x 1 ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) x 2 ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) , ) d ς 1 , d ς 2 , d ς 3 , ) ,

for all ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 and x = ( x i ) i = 1 c 0 β . We show that Q maps C 1 ( I 3 , c 0 β ) into itself. Let n N and ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 and then, by assumption ( i ) and ( i i i ) , we have

( Q x ) n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + β n s t s t s t K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + K s t s t s t β n h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 .

Thus, by assumption ( i v ) and the fact that h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) is in c 0 β space, we have

lim n ( Q ( x ) n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) = 0 .

We conclude that ( Q x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) c 0 β for any arbitrarily fixed ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 .

Then, we have

x n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) c 0 β = max n 1 β n r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + s t s t s t K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 max n 1 β n r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + β n s t s t s t K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 + max n 1 β n s t s t s t K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 + K s t s t s t max n 1 ( p n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) + q n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) sup i n { β n x i ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) } ) + K ( t s ) 2 [ P + Q x i ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) c 0 β ] .

So, we have

(3) [ 1 ( t s ) 2 K Q ] x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) c 0 β + ( t s ) 2 K P x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) c 0 β + ( t s ) 2 K P 1 ( t s ) 2 K Q ( = r ) .

Therefore, using equation (2), it is evident that Q is a self-mapping on C 1 ( I 3 , c 0 β ) . Also, ( Q x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) 0 c 0 β r , so the operator Q maps B r C 1 ( I 3 , c 0 β ) (ball of radius r centered at the origin) into itself.

Next, we demonstrate the continuity of the operator Q on B r . To achieve this, we consider a fixed ε > 0 and an element x B r . For any arbitrary, y B r satisfying y x ε , as well as a fixed ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 and n N . We deduce that

(4) β n ( Q x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ( Q y ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = β n s t s t s t K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) [ h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , y ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) ] d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 s t s t s t β n K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , y ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3

Using assumption ( i ) , we establish the set δ ( ε ) as

δ ( ε ) = sup { β n h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , y ) h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , x ) : x , y c 0 β , y x c 0 β < ε , n N } .

Then, δ ( ε ) 0 as ε 0 . So, by equation (4) and condition ( i i i ) , we have

( Q y ) ( Q x ) ( t s ) 2 K δ ( ε ) .

Thus, Q is a continuous operator on B r .

Our final step in the proof is to demonstrate that Q qualifies as a Meir-Keeler condensing operator. This entails establishing the existence of positive values ε and δ such that

ε χ ( B r ) < ε + δ χ ( Q ( B r ) ) < ε .

Now, applying the Hausdorff measure of non-compactness in c 0 β and conditions ( i i ) , ( i i i ) , and ( i v ) , we have

χ ( Q ( B r ) ) = lim n [ sup x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) B r { max k n β n x k ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) } ] lim n [ sup x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) B r { max k n β n ( r k ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + s t s t s t K k ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) h k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 lim n sup x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) B r max k n β n K s t s t s t K k ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) h k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 lim n sup x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) B r max k n β n K s t s t s t h k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 lim n sup x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) B r max k n β n K s t s t s t ( p k ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + q k ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) sup i k { x i ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) } ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 ( t s ) 2 K Q χ ( B r ) .

Thus,

χ ( Q ( B r ) ) ( t s ) 2 K Q χ ( B r ) < ε χ ( B r ) < ε ( t s ) 2 K Q .

Taking, δ = ε ( 1 ( t s ) 2 K Q ) ( t s ) 2 K Q , we obtain ε χ ( B r ) < δ + ε .

It can be observed that Q satisfies the conditions of a Meir-Keeler condensing operator on B r c 0 β . Consequently, all the requirements stated in Theorem 1.2 are met. Hence, the system (1) has a solution within the space c 0 β .□

Example 3.1

Consider the following infinite system of Hammerstein-type integral equations in three variables:

(5) x n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = 1 n arctan ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) n + 1 2 1 2 1 2 sin ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 + ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 n × ln 1 + 4 n 4 + ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 [ 4 + sup k n { x k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) } ] 4 [ ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 + n 4 ] d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 ,

for ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) [ 1 , 2 ] × [ 1 , 2 ] × [ 1 , 2 ] and n N .

We have

r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = 1 n arctan ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) n , K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) = sin ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 + ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 n , h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) = ln 1 + 4 n 4 + ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 [ 4 + sup k n { x k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) } ] 4 [ ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 + n 4 ] = 1 + 1 + ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) sup k n { x k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) } 4 [ ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) 2 + n 4 ] .

Consider β = β n = 1 n .

Let I denote the interval [ 1 , 2 ] , and we show that equation (5) satisfies all the conditions of Theorem 3.1. The operator Q 1 defined by ( Q 1 x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = ( h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , β n x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) ) transforms the space I 3 × c 0 β into c 0 β .

To show that ( Q 1 ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) is equicontinuous at an arbitrary point x c 0 β , let ε > 0 , n N and ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 , and consider y c 0 β such that y x c 0 β < ε . Then,

h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , x ) h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , y ) = ln 1 + ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 sup k n 1 n x k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) 4 [ ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 + n 4 ] ln 1 + ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 sup k n 1 n y k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) 4 [ ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 + n 4 ] ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 4 [ ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 + n 4 ] sup k n 1 n x k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) sup k n 1 n y k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) 1 16 sup k n 1 n x k y k .

Therefore, h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , x ) h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , y ) 1 16 x y c 0 β ε 16 , so the functions { ( Q 1 x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) } are equicontinuous.

Fixing ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 , x c 0 β , and n N , we deduce

h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , x ) = ln 1 + 1 + ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 sup k n 1 n x k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) 4 [ ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 + n 4 ] 1 + ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 sup k n 1 n x k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) 4 [ ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 + n 4 ] = 1 4 [ ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 + n 4 ] + ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 4 [ ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 + n 4 ] sup k n 1 n x k ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) .

Taking p n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = 1 4 [ ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) 2 + n 4 ] and q n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 4 [ ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) 2 + n 4 ] , it is clear that both p n and q n are functions with real values, and p n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) uniformly converges to zero.

Also, q n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) 1 4 n N . So P = 1 4 and

sup ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 { q n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) } = 1 4 .

The functions K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , v 1 , v 2 , v 3 ) are continuous on I 6 , and the function sequence ( K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , v 1 , v 2 , v 3 ) ) is equibounded on I 6 . And we have

K = sup { K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , v 1 , v 2 , v 3 ) : ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) , ( v 1 , v 2 , v 3 ) I 3 , n = 1 , 2 , } = 1 .

Now, fixing ε > 0 , ( v 1 , v 2 , v 3 ) I 3 and n = 1 , 2 , , then for arbitrary ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) and ( ψ 1 ¯ , ψ 2 ¯ , ψ 3 ¯ ) I 3 with

ψ 1 ¯ ψ 1 < ε 3 , ψ 2 ¯ ψ 2 < ε 3 , ψ 3 ¯ ψ 3 < ε 3 ,

we have

K n ( ψ 1 ¯ , ψ 2 ¯ , ψ 3 ¯ , v 1 , v 2 , v 3 ) K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , v 1 , v 2 , v 3 ) ψ 1 ¯ + ψ 2 ¯ + ψ 3 ¯ + v 1 + v 2 + v 3 n ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 + v 1 + v 2 + v 3 n 1 n ( ψ 1 ¯ ψ 1 ) + ( ψ 2 ¯ ψ 2 ) + ( ψ 3 ¯ ψ 3 ) 1 n ( ψ 1 ¯ ψ 1 + ψ 2 ¯ ψ 2 + ψ 3 ¯ ψ 3 ) ε .

Therefore, ( K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , v 1 , v 2 , v 3 ) ) is equicontinuous.

Furthermore, the function r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) is continuous for all ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 , and it converges uniformly to zero for all n N .

The factor ( t s ) 2 K Q = 1 4 < 1 . All the conditions outlined in Theorem 3.1 are fulfilled. As a result, the infinite system (5) has a solution that belongs to the space c 0 β .

4 Existence of solution in the space 1 β

In this section, we establish the conditions for the infinite system (1) to have a solution in the tempering sequence space 1 β . We consider the following assumptions:

  1. The functions ( h i ) i = 1 are real-valued and continuous defined on the set I 3 × R . The operator T : I 3 × 1 β 1 β defined on the space I 3 × c 0 β as

    ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , x ) ( T x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = ( β 1 h 1 ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) , β 2 h 2 ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) , ) .

    The collection of functions { ( T x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) } ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 exhibits equicontinuity at all points in the space c 0 β . This means that for any given value of ε > 0 , there exists a corresponding δ > 0 such that

    x y 1 β δ ( T x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ( T y ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) 1 β ε .

  2. For each fixed ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 , x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) C 1 ( I 3 , 1 β ) , the following inequality holds:

    h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) a n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + b n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) β i v i , n N .

    The functions a i ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) and b i ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) are continuous real-valued functions defined on the interval I 3 . The series of functions n = 1 a n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) uniformly converges on the interval I 3 , and the function sequence ( b i ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) i N is equibounded on I 3 . The function a ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) given by a ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = n = 1 a n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) is continuous, and the finite constants A and B are defined as

    A = max { a ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) : ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 } ,

    B = sup { b n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) : ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 } .

  3. The functions K n : I 6 R are continuous throughout the interval I 6 for all n N . Additionally, these functions K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) exhibit equicontinuity with respect to ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) . This means that for every ε > 0 , there exists a δ > 0 such that

    K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) K n ( ψ 1 ¯ , ψ 2 ¯ , ψ 3 ¯ , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) < ε ,

    where ψ 1 ψ 1 ¯ < δ , ψ 2 ψ 2 ¯ < δ , and ψ 3 ψ 3 ¯ < δ , for all ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) I 3 . In addition to that the function sequence ( K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) is equibounded on the set I 3 , and there exists a constant

    K = sup { β n K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) : ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) , ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) I 3 , n N } < .

  4. The functions r n : I 3 R are continuous, and the sequence of functions ( r n ) belongs to the space C 1 ( I 3 , 1 β ) .

Remark 4.1

Due to the fact that I 3 = [ s , t ] × [ s , t ] × [ s , t ] is a compact subset of R 3 , the continuity condition in ( d ) implies that r n : I 3 R is uniformly continuous. This, in turn, implies that the sequence of functions ( r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) is equicontinuous on I 3 . For any given ε > 0 , there exists a δ > 0 such that, for all ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) , ( v 1 , v 2 , v 3 ) I 3 ,

(6) ( r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) r n ( v 1 , v 2 , v 3 ) 1 β n = 1 r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) r n ( v 1 , v 2 , v 3 ) < ε ,

whenever ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ( v 1 , v 2 , v 3 ) < δ . In addition, from inequality (6), it is evident that the function series n = 1 r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) is convergent on I 3 and the function

r ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = n = 1 r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 )

is equicontinuous on I 3 . Therefore, the constant given by

= max { r ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) : ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 }

is finite.

Theorem 4.1

Under assumptions ( a ) ( d ) , the infinite system (1) possesses at least one solution denoted as x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = ( x i ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) i = 1 , belonging to 1 β , for a fixed ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 . This is guaranteed whenever the condition ( t s ) 2 K B < 1 holds.

Proof

An operator T is defined on the space Λ = C 1 ( I 3 , 1 β ) by

(7) ( T x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = ( ( T x ) n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) = r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + s t s t s t K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) β n h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 = ( r 1 ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) + s t s t s t K 1 ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) β 1 h 1 ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x 1 ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) , ) × d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 , ( r 2 ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) + s t s t s t K 1 ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) β 2 h 1 × ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x 2 ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) , ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 ,

for all ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 and x = ( x i ) i = 1 1 β .

First, we will show that T is a self-map of Λ into itself. Let n N and ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 using assumption ( a ) and ( c ) , we have

( T x ) n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) 1 β = n = 0 β n ( T x ) n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) n = 1 β n r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + n = 1 β n s t s t s t K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 R + n = 1 s t s t s t β n K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 R + K n = 1 s t s t s t [ a n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) + b n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) β n x n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ] d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 R + K a b s t s t s t a n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d s 3 + K B n = 1 s t s t s t β n x n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 .

Applying the Lebesgue monotone convergence theorem [15], we deduce

(8) n = 1 ( T x ) n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) R + K a b s t s t s t a n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d s 3 + K B n = 1 s t s t s t β n x n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3

(9) R + K A ( t s ) 2 + K B ( t s ) 2 sup { x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) 1 β : ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 } R + K A ( t s ) 2 + K B ( t s ) 2 x 1 β < .

Thus, the operator ( T x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) belongs to the space 1 β for any fixed ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 . Furthermore,

(10) x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) 1 β = n = 1 β n r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + n = 1 β n s t s t s t K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) × h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 R + K A ( t s ) 2 + K B ( t s ) 2 x 1 β .

Using (10), since K B ( t s ) 2 < 1 , we have

(11) [ 1 ( t s ) 2 K B ] x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) 1 β R + ( t s ) 2 K A ,

x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) 1 β R + ( t s ) 2 K A 1 ( t s ) 2 K B = ( r 1 ) .

By employing equation (8), we can deduce that T is a self-map on Λ .

Additionally, due to the fact that ( T x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) < r 1 , it follows that the operator T maps the ball ( B r 1 ) , which is centered at the origin and has a radius of r 1 , into itself.

Now, we show that T is continuous on B r 1 . Let ε > 0 and x B r 1 . Then, for arbitrary z B r 1 with z x 1 β ε , arbitrary fixed ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 , and n N .

(12) ( T z ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ( T x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) 1 β = n = 1 β n s t s t s t K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) [ h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , z ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) ] d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 n = 1 β n s t s t s t K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , z ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 K n = 1 β n s t s t s t h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , z ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 .

Using condition ( a ) , we define the set δ ( ε ) as follows:

δ ( ε ) = sup { β n h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , z ) h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , x ) : x , z B r 1 , z x 1 β < ε , ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 , n N } .

Then, we have that δ ( ε ) 0 as ε 0 .

Using assumption ( c ) and applying the Lebesgue monotone convergence theorem [15], we can deduce the following result based on inequality (11):

(13) ( T z ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) ( T x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) 1 β K n = 1 β n s t s t s t h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , z ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 K s t s t s t h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , z ) h n ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ) 1 β d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 ( t s ) 2 K δ ( ε ) .

Since (13) holds for arbitrary fixed ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 ,

T z T x 1 β sup ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 { ( T z ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ( T z ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) 1 β } ( t s ) 2 K δ ( ε ) .

Thus, T is a continuous operator on B r 1 .

To demonstrate that T is a Meir-Keeler condensing operator, we need to establish the existence of ε > 0 and δ > 0 such that

ε χ ( B r 1 ) < ε + δ χ ( T ( B r 1 ) ) < ε .

Making use of the Hausdorff measure of non-compactness in 1 β and assumptions ( b ) ( d ) , we deduce

χ ( T ( B r 1 ) ) = lim n sup x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) B r 1 k n β n ( x k ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) lim n sup x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) B r 1 k n ( β n r k ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + s t s t s t β n K k ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) h k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 lim n sup x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) B r 1 k n β n r k ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + K s t s t s t β n h k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 , x ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 lim n k n β k r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + K sup x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) B r 1 k n s t s t s t a k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) + b k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) β k x k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 .

Applying the Lebesgue-dominated convergence theorem, we obtain

χ ( T ( B r 1 ) ) lim n k n β k r k ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + K s t s t s t k n a k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 + B s t s t s t sup x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) B r 1 k n β k x k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 K B s t s t s t lim n sup x ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) B r 1 k n β k x k ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 ( t s ) 2 K B χ ( B r 1 ) .

Therefore,

χ ( T ( B r 1 ) ) ( t s ) 2 K B χ ( B r 1 ) < ε χ ( B r 1 ) < ε ( t s ) 2 K B .

Taking δ = ε ( 1 ( t s ) 2 K B ) ( t s ) 2 K B , we obtain that ε χ ( B r 1 ) < ε + δ .

Hence, T qualifies as a Meir-Keeler condensing operator on B r 1 1 β . Consequently, according to Theorem 3.1, T possesses a fixed point within B r 1 , implying the existence of a solution for the system (1) in 1 β .□

Example 4.1

Let us consider an infinite set of Hammerstein-type integral equations in three variables:

(14) x n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = 1 n 2 ln [ ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) + n ] + 1 2 1 2 1 2 arctan ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 + ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 + n ) × ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 e n ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) + sin n ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 + n x n 2 ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) 1 + x 1 2 ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) + + x n 2 ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) d ς 1 d ς 2 d ς 3 ,

for ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) , ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) [ 1 , 2 ] × [ 1 , 2 ] × [ 1 , 2 ] .

From equation (14), we have

r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = 1 n 2 ln [ ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) + n ] ,

K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) = arctan ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 + ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 + n ) ,

h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , x 1 , x 2 , ) = ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 e n ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) + sin n ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) ( ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 ) 2 + n × x n 2 ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) 1 + x 1 2 ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + + x n 2 ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) .

It is clear that r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) is continuous on I 3 = [ 1 , 2 ] × [ 1 , 2 ] × [ 1 , 2 ] for ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) , ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) I 3 and n N .

Taking the tempering sequence β = β n = 1 n 3 , for fixed ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) , ( u 1 , u 2 , u 3 ) I 3 , we observe that

( r n ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ( r n ) ( u 1 , u 2 , u 3 ) = n = 1 β n r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) r n ( u 1 , u 2 , u 3 ) = n = 1 1 n 5 ln [ ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) + n ] ln [ ( u 1 + u 2 + u 3 ) + n ] = n = 1 1 n 5 ln 1 + ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 u 1 u 2 u 3 u 1 + u 2 + u 3 + n n = 1 1 n 6 ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 u 1 u 2 u 3 [ ψ 1 , u 1 + ψ 2 , u 2 + ψ 3 u 3 ] ζ ( 6 ) ,

where the symbol ζ ( s ) represents the Riemann zeta function.

If we choose δ = ε ζ ( 6 ) , so that

ψ 1 , u 1 < δ 3 , ψ 1 , u 1 < δ 3 , ψ 3 u 3 < δ 3 ,

we obtain

( r n ) ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) ( r n ) ( u 1 + u 2 + u 3 ) < ε .

Moreover, for every ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 , we deduce

r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) 1 n 5 ln ( 4 + n ) 1 n 5 4 + n 2 n 5 + 1 n 6 5 .

Thus,

(15) R = max n = 1 r n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) : ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 = n = 1 2 n 5 + 1 n 6 5 = 2 ζ ( 5 ) + ζ ( 1.2 ) < .

Thus, assumption ( d ) and Remark (4.1) are satisfied. Also, the function K n is continuous on I 6 and

K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) = arctan ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 + ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 + n ) π 2 .

Therefore, the sequence of functions ( K n ) is uniformly bounded on the interval I 6 .

Also, for fixed ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) , ( u 1 , u 2 , u 3 ) I 3 , we have

K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) K n ( u 1 , u 2 , u 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) = arctan ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 + ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 + n ) arctan ( u 1 + u 2 + u 3 + ς 1 + ς 2 + ς 3 + n ) ψ 1 , u 1 + ψ 2 , u 2 + ψ 3 u 3 .

It is evident that the function sequence K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) is equicontinuous with respect to ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 uniformly with respect to ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) I 3 , and the value of the constant K is given as

(16) K = sup { K n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) : ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) , ( ς 1 , ς 2 , ς 3 ) I 3 , n N } = π 2 .

Thus, all conditions of assumption ( c ) are satisfied.

Again,

h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , x ) ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) 2 e n ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) + 1 n 3 sin n ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) 2 + n 3 x n 2 1 + x 1 2 + x 2 2 + + x n 2 ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) 2 e n ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) + 1 ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) 2 + n 3 1 n 3 x n 2 1 + x 1 2 + x 2 2 + + x n 2 ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) 2 e n ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) + 1 ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) 2 + n 3 1 n 3 x n 1 + x n 2 ( x n ) ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) 2 e n ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) + 1 2 [ ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) 2 + n 3 ] 1 n 3 x n .

Taking a n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) 2 e n ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) and b n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = 1 2 [ ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) 2 + n 3 ] , we have

h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , x ) a n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) + b n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) β n x n .

It is obvious that the functions a n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) are continuous on I 3 , for any ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 we have a n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) 9 n 3 e 3 and the function series

a ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = n = 1 a n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) 2 e ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 1

is uniformly convergent on I 3 .

Also,

b n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) = 1 2 [ ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) 2 + n 3 ] 1 2 n 3 1 2 ,

for all n N . Thus, the sequence of functions ( b n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ) is uniformly bounded on the interval I 3 . The values of the constants A and B are as follows:

(17) A = max { a ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) : ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 } = 36 e 3 1 and B = 1 2 ,

and ( t s ) 2 K B = π 8 .

Using, (11), (15), (16), and (17), we obtain

r 1 = 2 ζ ( 5 ) + ζ ( 1.2 ) + ( 2 1 ) 2 × 1 2 × 36 e 3 1 1 π 8 .

Finally, we check if assumption ( a ) is satisfied. Fixing x = ( x n ) B r 1 1 β and ε > 0 , then for fixed ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) I 3 , we have

( T z ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ( T x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) 1 β = n = 1 β n h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , z ) h n ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 , x ) n = 1 1 n 3 sin n ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) ( ψ 1 + ψ 2 + ψ 3 ) 2 + n 3 z n 2 1 + z 1 2 + + z n 2 x n 2 1 + x 1 2 + + x n 2 n = 1 1 n 6 z n 2 ( 1 + x 1 2 + + x n 2 ) x n 2 ( 1 + z 1 2 + + z n 2 ) n = 1 1 n 6 [ z n 2 x n 2 + z n 2 ( x 1 2 + + x n 2 ) z n 2 ( z 1 2 + + z n 2 ) z n 2 ( z 1 2 + + z n 2 ) x n 2 ( z 1 2 + + z n 2 ) ] n = 1 1 n 6 [ z n 2 x n 2 + z n 2 ( x 1 2 z 1 2 + + x n 2 z n 2 ) z n 2 x n 2 ( z 1 2 + + z n 2 ) ] .

Since x n , z n B r 1 , n N , x n r 1 , z n < r 1 , so

( T z ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) ( T x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) 1 β n = 1 1 n 6 ( z n x n ( z n + x n ) ) ( 1 + z 1 2 + + z n 2 ) + z n 2 ( x 1 z 1 ( x 1 + z 1 ) + + x n z n ( x n + z n ) ) < 2 r 1 n = 1 1 n 6 z n x n ( 1 + n r 1 2 ) + r 1 2 i = 1 x i z i = 2 r 1 z x 1 β n = 1 1 n 6 [ ( 1 + n r 1 2 ) + r 1 2 ] = 2 r 1 z x 1 β ( [ 1 + r 1 2 ] ζ ( 6 ) + r 1 2 ζ ( 5 ) ) .

Thus, choose δ = ε 2 r 1 ( 1 r 1 2 ) ( ζ ( 6 ) + r 1 2 ζ ( 5 ) ) , and then for z x 1 β < δ we have

T ( z ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) T ( x ) ( ψ 1 , ψ 2 , ψ 3 ) 1 β < ε .

Consequently, assumption ( a ) is fulfilled as well. As a result, according to Theorem 3.1, we can deduce that the system (14) has a solution within the subset B r 1 of 1 β .

5 Conclusion

In this work, we have used the Hausdorff measure of non-compactness to prove the existence of solutions for a system of integral equations of Hammerstein type in the space of tempering sequences c 0 β and 1 β . Our results improve the results of Malik and Jalal [10]. Our results are more generalized in larger sequence spaces.



  1. Funding information: The authors declare that no funding was available for this article.

  2. Author contributions: All authors contributed equally in writing this article. Furthermore, this manuscript were read and approved by all authors.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

  4. Code availability: No code was used in this article.

  5. Data availability statement: This research article does not involve any data.

References

[1] A. Aghajani, M. Mursaleen, and A. Shole Haghighi, Fixed point theorems for Meir-Keeler condensing operators via measure of noncompactness, Acta Math. Sci. 35 (2015), no. 3, 552–566, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0252-9602(15)30003-5. 10.1016/S0252-9602(15)30003-5Search in Google Scholar

[2] J. Banaś and M. Krajewska, Existence of Solutions for Infinite Systems of Differential Equations in Spaces of Tempered Sequences, Texas State University, Department of Mathematics, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

[3] M. Beddani, H. Beddani, and M. Feckan Qualitative study for impulsive pantograph fractional integro-differential equation via ψ-Hilfer derivative, Miskolc Math. Notes 24 (2023), no. 2, 635–651, DOI: https://doi.org/10.18514/MMN.2023.4032. 10.18514/MMN.2023.4032Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. Beddania and H. Beddanib, Compactness of boundary value problems for impulsive integro-differential equation, Filomat 37 (2023)no. 20, 6855–6866, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL2320855B. 10.2298/FIL2320855BSearch in Google Scholar

[5] K. Kuratowski, Sur les espaces complets, Fund. Math. 1 (1930), no. 15, 301–309. 10.4064/fm-15-1-301-309Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. Banaś, Measures of noncompactness in the space of continuous tempered functions, Demonstr. Math. 14 (1981), no. 1, 127–134. 10.1515/dema-1981-0110Search in Google Scholar

[7] G. Darbo, Punti uniti in trasformazioni a codominio non compatto, Rend. Semin. Mat. Univ. Padova 24 (1955), 84–92. Search in Google Scholar

[8] E. Kreyszig, Introductory Functional Analysis with Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Toronto, vol 17, 1991. Search in Google Scholar

[9] J. Banaś and M. Mursaleen, Sequence Spaces and Measures of Noncompactness with Applications to Differential and Integral Equations, Springer, New Delhi, 2014. 10.1007/978-81-322-1886-9Search in Google Scholar

[10] I. A. Malik and T. Jalal, Infinite system of integral equations in two variables of Hammerstein type in c0 and ℓ1 spaces, Filomat 33 (2019), no. 11, 3441–3455, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL1911441M. 10.2298/FIL1911441MSearch in Google Scholar

[11] A. Samadi, M. M. Avini, and M. Mursaleen, Solutions of an infinite system of integral equations of Volterra-Stieltjes type in the sequence spaces ℓp and c0, AIMS Math. 5 (2020) no. 4, 3791–3808, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/math2020246. 10.3934/math.2020246Search in Google Scholar

[12] M. Ghasemi, M. Khanehgir, R. Allahyari, On solutions of infinite systems of integral equations in N-variables in spaces of tempered sequences c0β and ℓ1β, J. Math. Anal. 9 (2018), no. 6, 183–192. Search in Google Scholar

[13] A. Das, B. Hazarika, R. Arab, and M. Mursaleen, Solvability of the infinite system of integral equations in two variables in the sequence spaces c0 and ℓ1, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 326 (2017), 183–192, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2017.05.035. 10.1016/j.cam.2017.05.035Search in Google Scholar

[14] E. Keeler and A. Meir, A theorem on contraction mappings, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 28 (1969), 326–329. 10.1016/0022-247X(69)90031-6Search in Google Scholar

[15] W. Rudin, Real and Complex Analysis, Tata McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 2006. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-07-19
Revised: 2023-12-02
Accepted: 2024-05-17
Published Online: 2024-09-26

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. On the p-fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff equations with electromagnetic fields and the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev nonlinearity
  3. L-Fuzzy fixed point results in -metric spaces with applications
  4. Solutions of a coupled system of hybrid boundary value problems with Riesz-Caputo derivative
  5. Nonparametric methods of statistical inference for double-censored data with applications
  6. LADM procedure to find the analytical solutions of the nonlinear fractional dynamics of partial integro-differential equations
  7. Existence of projected solutions for quasi-variational hemivariational inequality
  8. Spectral collocation method for convection-diffusion equation
  9. New local fractional Hermite-Hadamard-type and Ostrowski-type inequalities with generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel for generalized h-preinvex functions
  10. On the asymptotics of eigenvalues for a Sturm-Liouville problem with symmetric single-well potential
  11. On exact rate of convergence of row sequences of multipoint Hermite-Padé approximants
  12. The essential norm of bounded diagonal infinite matrices acting on Banach sequence spaces
  13. Decay rate of the solutions to the Cauchy problem of the Lord Shulman thermoelastic Timoshenko model with distributed delay
  14. Enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of two uniformly convergent numerical solvers for singularly perturbed parabolic convection–diffusion–reaction problems with two small parameters
  15. An inertial shrinking projection self-adaptive algorithm for solving split variational inclusion problems and fixed point problems in Banach spaces
  16. An equation for complex fractional diffusion created by the Struve function with a T-symmetric univalent solution
  17. On the existence and Ulam-Hyers stability for implicit fractional differential equation via fractional integral-type boundary conditions
  18. Some properties of a class of holomorphic functions associated with tangent function
  19. The existence of multiple solutions for a class of upper critical Choquard equation in a bounded domain
  20. On the continuity in q of the family of the limit q-Durrmeyer operators
  21. Results on solutions of several systems of the product type complex partial differential difference equations
  22. On Berezin norm and Berezin number inequalities for sum of operators
  23. Geometric invariants properties of osculating curves under conformal transformation in Euclidean space ℝ3
  24. On a generalization of the Opial inequality
  25. A novel numerical approach to solutions of fractional Bagley-Torvik equation fitted with a fractional integral boundary condition
  26. Holomorphic curves into projective spaces with some special hypersurfaces
  27. On Periodic solutions for implicit nonlinear Caputo tempered fractional differential problems
  28. Approximation of complex q-Beta-Baskakov-Szász-Stancu operators in compact disk
  29. Existence and regularity of solutions for non-autonomous integrodifferential evolution equations involving nonlocal conditions
  30. Jordan left derivations in infinite matrix rings
  31. Nonlinear nonlocal elliptic problems in ℝ3: existence results and qualitative properties
  32. Invariant means and lacunary sequence spaces of order (α, β)
  33. Novel results for two families of multivalued dominated mappings satisfying generalized nonlinear contractive inequalities and applications
  34. Global in time well-posedness of a three-dimensional periodic regularized Boussinesq system
  35. Existence of solutions for nonlinear problems involving mixed fractional derivatives with p(x)-Laplacian operator
  36. Some applications and maximum principles for multi-term time-space fractional parabolic Monge-Ampère equation
  37. On three-dimensional q-Riordan arrays
  38. Some aspects of normal curve on smooth surface under isometry
  39. Mittag-Leffler-Hyers-Ulam stability for a first- and second-order nonlinear differential equations using Fourier transform
  40. Topological structure of the solution sets to non-autonomous evolution inclusions driven by measures on the half-line
  41. Remark on the Daugavet property for complex Banach spaces
  42. Decreasing and complete monotonicity of functions defined by derivatives of completely monotonic function involving trigamma function
  43. Uniqueness of meromorphic functions concerning small functions and derivatives-differences
  44. Asymptotic approximations of Apostol-Frobenius-Euler polynomials of order α in terms of hyperbolic functions
  45. Hyers-Ulam stability of Davison functional equation on restricted domains
  46. Involvement of three successive fractional derivatives in a system of pantograph equations and studying the existence solution and MLU stability
  47. Composition of some positive linear integral operators
  48. On bivariate fractal interpolation for countable data and associated nonlinear fractal operator
  49. Generalized result on the global existence of positive solutions for a parabolic reaction-diffusion model with an m × m diffusion matrix
  50. Online makespan minimization for MapReduce scheduling on multiple parallel machines
  51. The sequential Henstock-Kurzweil delta integral on time scales
  52. On a discrete version of Fejér inequality for α-convex sequences without symmetry condition
  53. Existence of three solutions for two quasilinear Laplacian systems on graphs
  54. Embeddings of anisotropic Sobolev spaces into spaces of anisotropic Hölder-continuous functions
  55. Nilpotent perturbations of m-isometric and m-symmetric tensor products of commuting d-tuples of operators
  56. Characterizations of transcendental entire solutions of trinomial partial differential-difference equations in ℂ2#
  57. Fractional Sturm-Liouville operators on compact star graphs
  58. Exact controllability for nonlinear thermoviscoelastic plate problem
  59. Improved modified gradient-based iterative algorithm and its relaxed version for the complex conjugate and transpose Sylvester matrix equations
  60. Superposition operator problems of Hölder-Lipschitz spaces
  61. A note on λ-analogue of Lah numbers and λ-analogue of r-Lah numbers
  62. Ground state solutions and multiple positive solutions for nonhomogeneous Kirchhoff equation with Berestycki-Lions type conditions
  63. A note on 1-semi-greedy bases in p-Banach spaces with 0 < p ≤ 1
  64. Fixed point results for generalized convex orbital Lipschitz operators
  65. Asymptotic model for the propagation of surface waves on a rotating magnetoelastic half-space
  66. Multiplicity of k-convex solutions for a singular k-Hessian system
  67. Poisson C*-algebra derivations in Poisson C*-algebras
  68. Signal recovery and polynomiographic visualization of modified Noor iteration of operators with property (E)
  69. Approximations to precisely localized supports of solutions for non-linear parabolic p-Laplacian problems
  70. Solving nonlinear fractional differential equations by common fixed point results for a pair of (α, Θ)-type contractions in metric spaces
  71. Pseudo compact almost automorphic solutions to a family of delay differential equations
  72. Periodic measures of fractional stochastic discrete wave equations with nonlinear noise
  73. Asymptotic study of a nonlinear elliptic boundary Steklov problem on a nanostructure
  74. Cramer's rule for a class of coupled Sylvester commutative quaternion matrix equations
  75. Quantitative estimates for perturbed sampling Kantorovich operators in Orlicz spaces
  76. Review Articles
  77. Penalty method for unilateral contact problem with Coulomb's friction in time-fractional derivatives
  78. Differential sandwich theorems for p-valent analytic functions associated with a generalization of the integral operator
  79. Special Issue on Development of Fuzzy Sets and Their Extensions - Part II
  80. Higher-order circular intuitionistic fuzzy time series forecasting methodology: Application of stock change index
  81. Binary relations applied to the fuzzy substructures of quantales under rough environment
  82. Algorithm selection model based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision in big data information mining
  83. A new machine learning approach based on spatial fuzzy data correlation for recognizing sports activities
  84. Benchmarking the efficiency of distribution warehouses using a four-phase integrated PCA-DEA-improved fuzzy SWARA-CoCoSo model for sustainable distribution
  85. Special Issue on Application of Fractional Calculus: Mathematical Modeling and Control - Part II
  86. A study on a type of degenerate poly-Dedekind sums
  87. Efficient scheme for a category of variable-order optimal control problems based on the sixth-kind Chebyshev polynomials
  88. Special Issue on Mathematics for Artificial intelligence and Artificial intelligence for Mathematics
  89. Toward automated hail disaster weather recognition based on spatio-temporal sequence of radar images
  90. The shortest-path and bee colony optimization algorithms for traffic control at single intersection with NetworkX application
  91. Neural network quaternion-based controller for port-Hamiltonian system
  92. Matching ontologies with kernel principle component analysis and evolutionary algorithm
  93. Survey on machine vision-based intelligent water quality monitoring techniques in water treatment plant: Fish activity behavior recognition-based schemes and applications
  94. Artificial intelligence-driven tone recognition of Guzheng: A linear prediction approach
  95. Transformer learning-based neural network algorithms for identification and detection of electronic bullying in social media
  96. Squirrel search algorithm-support vector machine: Assessing civil engineering budgeting course using an SSA-optimized SVM model
  97. Special Issue on International E-Conference on Mathematical and Statistical Sciences - Part I
  98. Some fixed point results on ultrametric spaces endowed with a graph
  99. On the generalized Mellin integral operators
  100. On existence and multiplicity of solutions for a biharmonic problem with weights via Ricceri's theorem
  101. Approximation process of a positive linear operator of hypergeometric type
  102. On Kantorovich variant of Brass-Stancu operators
  103. A higher-dimensional categorical perspective on 2-crossed modules
  104. Special Issue on Some Integral Inequalities, Integral Equations, and Applications - Part I
  105. On parameterized inequalities for fractional multiplicative integrals
  106. On inverse source term for heat equation with memory term
  107. On Fejér-type inequalities for generalized trigonometrically and hyperbolic k-convex functions
  108. New extensions related to Fejér-type inequalities for GA-convex functions
  109. Derivation of Hermite-Hadamard-Jensen-Mercer conticrete inequalities for Atangana-Baleanu fractional integrals by means of majorization
  110. Some Hardy's inequalities on conformable fractional calculus
  111. The novel quadratic phase Fourier S-transform and associated uncertainty principles in the quaternion setting
  112. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Fixed-Point Theory and Applications - Part I
  113. A novel iterative process for numerical reckoning of fixed points via generalized nonlinear mappings with qualitative study
  114. Some new fixed point theorems of α-partially nonexpansive mappings
  115. Generalized Yosida inclusion problem involving multi-valued operator with XOR operation
  116. Periodic and fixed points for mappings in extended b-gauge spaces equipped with a graph
  117. Convergence of Peaceman-Rachford splitting method with Bregman distance for three-block nonconvex nonseparable optimization
  118. Topological structure of the solution sets to neutral evolution inclusions driven by measures
  119. (α, F)-Geraghty-type generalized F-contractions on non-Archimedean fuzzy metric-unlike spaces
  120. Solvability of infinite system of integral equations of Hammerstein type in three variables in tempering sequence spaces c 0 β and 1 β
  121. Special Issue on Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Their Applications - Part I
  122. Fuzzy fractional delay integro-differential equation with the generalized Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative
  123. Klein-Gordon potential in characteristic coordinates
  124. Asymptotic analysis of Leray solution for the incompressible NSE with damping
  125. Special Issue on Blow-up Phenomena in Nonlinear Equations of Mathematical Physics - Part I
  126. Long time decay of incompressible convective Brinkman-Forchheimer in L2(ℝ3)
  127. Numerical solution of general order Emden-Fowler-type Pantograph delay differential equations
  128. Global smooth solution to the n-dimensional liquid crystal equations with fractional dissipation
  129. Spectral properties for a system of Dirac equations with nonlinear dependence on the spectral parameter
  130. A memory-type thermoelastic laminated beam with structural damping and microtemperature effects: Well-posedness and general decay
  131. The asymptotic behavior for the Navier-Stokes-Voigt-Brinkman-Forchheimer equations with memory and Tresca friction in a thin domain
  132. Absence of global solutions to wave equations with structural damping and nonlinear memory
  133. Special Issue on Differential Equations and Numerical Analysis - Part I
  134. Vanishing viscosity limit for a one-dimensional viscous conservation law in the presence of two noninteracting shocks
  135. Limiting dynamics for stochastic complex Ginzburg-Landau systems with time-varying delays on unbounded thin domains
  136. A comparison of two nonconforming finite element methods for linear three-field poroelasticity
Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dema-2024-0025/html
Scroll to top button