Startseite Taylor’s series expansions for real powers of two functions containing squares of inverse cosine function, closed-form formula for specific partial Bell polynomials, and series representations for real powers of Pi
Artikel Open Access

Taylor’s series expansions for real powers of two functions containing squares of inverse cosine function, closed-form formula for specific partial Bell polynomials, and series representations for real powers of Pi

  • Feng Qi EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. Oktober 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this article, by virtue of expansions of two finite products of finitely many square sums, with the aid of series expansions of composite functions of (hyperbolic) sine and cosine functions with inverse sine and cosine functions, and in the light of properties of partial Bell polynomials, the author establishes Taylor’s series expansions of real powers of two functions containing squares of inverse (hyperbolic) cosine functions in terms of the Stirling numbers of the first kind, presents a closed-form formula of specific partial Bell polynomials at a sequence of derivatives of a function containing the square of inverse cosine function, derives several combinatorial identities involving the Stirling numbers of the first kind, demonstrates several series representations of the circular constant Pi and its real powers, recovers Maclaurin’s series expansions of positive integer powers of inverse (hyperbolic) sine functions in terms of the Stirling numbers of the first kind, and also deduces other useful, meaningful, and significant conclusions and an application to the Riemann zeta function.

1 Simple preliminaries

In this article, we use the notations

N = { 1 , 2 , } , N 0 = { 0 , 1 , 2 , } , N = { 1 , 2 , } , Z = { 0 , ± 1 , ± 2 , } .

The rising factorial, or say, the Pochhammer symbol, of β C is defined [1, p. 7497] by

(1.1) ( β ) n = k = 0 n 1 ( β + k ) = β ( β + 1 ) ( β + n 1 ) , n N ; 1 , n = 0 .

For α , β C with α + β C { 0 , 1 , 2 , } , extended Pochhammer symbol ( β ) α is defined [2] by

(1.2) ( β ) α = Γ ( α + β ) Γ ( β ) ,

where the classical Euler gamma function Γ ( z ) can be defined [3, Chapter 3] by

Γ ( z ) = lim n n ! n z k = 0 n ( z + k ) , z C { 0 , 1 , 2 , } .

The falling factorial for β C and n N is defined by

β n = k = 0 n 1 ( β k ) = β ( β 1 ) ( β n + 1 ) , n N ; 1 , n = 0 .

The extended binomial coefficient z w is defined [4] by

(1.3) z w = Γ ( z + 1 ) Γ ( w + 1 ) Γ ( z w + 1 ) , z N , w , z w N ; 0 , z N , w N or z w N ; z w w ! , z N , w N 0 ; z z w ( z w ) ! , z , w N , z w N 0 ; 0 , z , w N , z w N ; , z N , w Z .

The Stirling numbers of the first kind s ( n , k ) for n k 0 can be generated [3, p. 20, (1.30)] by

(1.4) [ ln ( 1 + x ) ] k k ! = n = k s ( n , k ) x n n ! , x < 1

and satisfy diagonal recursive relations

s ( n + k , k ) n + k k = = 0 n ( 1 ) k ! m = 0 ( 1 ) m m s ( n + m , m ) n + m m

and

s ( n , k ) = ( 1 ) n k = 0 k 1 ( 1 ) n 1 k n 1 s ( n , k ) .

See [5, p. 23, Theorem 1.1], [6, Remark 2.1], and [7, p. 156, Theorem 4].

The partial Bell polynomials, or say, the Bell polynomials of the second kind, can be denoted and defined by

B n , k ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n k + 1 ) = 1 i n k + 1 i { 0 } N i = 1 n k + 1 i i = n i = 1 n k + 1 i = k n ! i = 1 n k + 1 i ! i = 1 n k + 1 x i i ! i .

in [8, p. 412, Definition 11.2] and [9, p. 134, Theorem A].

According to [10, p. 20], the inverse cosine function arccos z can be defined by

arccos z = π 2 + i ln [ ( 1 z 2 ) 1 / 2 + i z ] , z C ( , 1 ) ( 1 , ) ; π i ln [ ( x 2 1 ) 1 / 2 x ] , x ( , 1 ] ; i ln [ ( x 2 1 ) 1 / 2 + x ] , x [ 1 , ) ,

where the upper/lower signs corresponding to the upper/lower sides of the rays ( , 1 ] and [ 1 , ) , and the notation ln z denotes the principal value of the logarithmic function Ln z in z C { 0 } .

2 Motivations

Let f ( z ) and h ( z ) be infinitely differentiable functions such that the function f ( z ) has the formal series expansion f ( z ) = k = 0 c k z k and the composite function h ( f ( z ) ) is defined on a non-empty open interval. A natural problem is to find the series expansion of the composite function h ( f ( z ) ) . This problem can be regarded as how to compute derivatives of the composite function h ( f ( z ) ) . There have been a long history and a number of literature in textbooks, handbooks, monographs, and research articles on this problem. See [2,3,11, 12,13], for example.

In the above general theory, the cases h ( z ) = z r for r C { 1 } and f ( z ) being concrete elementary functions are of special interest and attract some mathematicians. We recall some results as follows.

Equation (1.4) can be rearranged as Maclaurin’s series expansions of the power function

ln ( 1 + x ) x k = n = 0 s ( n + k , k ) n + k k x n n !

for x < 1 and k 0 . The Stirling numbers of the second kind S ( n , k ) for n k 0 can be generated [14, pp. 131–132] by

(2.1) ( e x 1 ) k k ! = n = k S ( n , k ) x n n ! .

Equation (2.1) can be rearranged as Maclaurin’s series expansions of the power function

e x 1 x k = n = 0 S ( n + k , k ) n + k k x n n ! , k 0 .

In [15, p. 377, (3.5)] and [16, pp. 109–110, Lemma 1], it was obtained that

I μ ( x ) I ν ( x ) = 1 Γ ( μ + 1 ) Γ ( ν + 1 ) n = 0 ( μ + ν + n + 1 ) n n ! ( μ + 1 ) n ( ν + 1 ) n x 2 2 n + μ + ν ,

where the first kind of modified Bessel function I ν ( z ) can be represented [11, p. 375, 9.6.10] by

I ν ( z ) = n = 0 1 n ! Γ ( ν + n + 1 ) z 2 2 n + ν , z C .

In [17, p. 310], the power series expansion

[ I ν ( z ) ] 2 = k = 0 1 [ Γ ( ν + k + 1 ) ] 2 2 k + 2 ν k z 2 2 k + 2 ν

was listed. As for the series expansion of the function [ I ν ( z ) ] r for ν C { 1 , 2 , } and r , z C , recursive formulas were investigated in [18,17,19,20,21]. One of the reasons why one investigated the series expansions of the functions [ I ν ( z ) ] r is that the products of the (modified) Bessel functions of the first kind appear frequently in problems of statistical mechanics and plasma physics, see [22,23,24].

In the articles [1,12,25,26,27,28,29], Maclaurin’s series expansions of the powers

arcsin z z m , ( arcsin z ) m 1 z 2 , arcsinh z z m , ( arcsinh z ) m 1 + z 2 , ( arctan z ) m , ( arctanh z ) m , sin m z , cos m z , tan m z , cot m z , sec m z , csc m z

for m 2 and their history were reviewed, surveyed, established, discussed, and applied. Now we recite the following two series expansions.

Theorem 2.1

([27, Theorem 1]) For k N and x < 1 , the function arcsin x x k , whose value at x = 0 is defined to be 1, has Maclaurin’s series expansion

(2.2) arcsin x x k = 1 + m = 1 ( 1 ) m Q ( k , 2 m ) k + 2 m k ( 2 x ) 2 m ( 2 m ) ! ,

where

(2.3) Q ( k , m ) = = 0 m k + 1 k 1 s ( k + m 1 , k + 1 ) k + m 2 2

for k N and m 2 .

Theorem 2.2

([27, Corollary 2]) For k N and x < , the function arcsinh x x k , whose value at x = 0 is defined to be 1, has Maclaurin’s series expansion

(2.4) arcsinh x x k = 1 + m = 1 Q ( k , 2 m ) k + 2 m k ( 2 x ) 2 m ( 2 m ) ! ,

where Q ( k , 2 m ) is given by (2.3).

In the articles [1,27], the series expansion (2.2) has been applied to derive closed-form formulas for specific partial Bell polynomials and to establish series representations of the generalized logsine function. These results are needed and considered in [30,31, 32,33], respectively.

In the community of mathematics, the circular constant Pi has attracted a number of mathematicians spending long time and utilizing many methods to calculate it. The setting-up of the international Pi Day is the best demonstration of the importance of the circular constant Pi. Taking x = 2 2 in (2.2) produces the series representation

(2.5) π 2 2 k = 1 + k ! m = 1 ( 1 ) m 2 m Q ( k , 2 m ) ( k + 2 m ) ! .

In this article, by virtue of expansions of two finite products of finitely many square sums

= 1 k ( 2 + α 2 ) and = 1 k [ ( 2 1 ) 2 + α 2 ]

for k N in Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2, with the aid of Taylor’s series expansions around x = 1 of the functions cosh ( α arccos x ) and cos ( α arccos x ) in Lemma 3.3, and in the light of properties of partial Bell polynomials selected in Lemma 3.4, we will

  1. establish Taylor’s series expansions around x = 1 of the functions

    ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) α and ( arccosh x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) k

    for α R and k N in terms of Q ( k , m ) in Theorems 4.1 and 5.2;

  2. present a closed-form formula of the specific partial Bell polynomials

    B m , k 1 12 , 2 45 , 3 70 , 32 525 , 80 693 , , ( 2 m 2 k + 2 ) ! ! ( 2 m 2 k + 4 ) ! Q ( 2 , 2 m 2 k + 2 )

    for m k N in Theorem 5.1;

  3. derive some interesting combinatorial identities involving the Stirling numbers of the first kind s ( n , k ) in Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2, in Corollaries 4.7 and 5.1, and in the proof of Theorem 5.1;

  4. demonstrate several series representations of the circular constant π and its powers π α for α R in Corollaries 4.2 and 5.2;

  5. recover Maclaurin’s series expansions (2.2) and (2.4) in Theorem 2.1 and 2.2; and

  6. deduce some other useful, meaningful, and significant conclusions and an application to the Riemann zeta function ζ ( x ) in Corollaries 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, and 4.6, in Remarks 3.3 and 4.1, in Section 7, and elsewhere in this article.

3 Important lemmas

For attaining our aims mentioned just now, we need the following four important lemmas.

Lemma 3.1

For k N and α C , we have

(3.1) = 1 k ( 2 + α 2 ) = ( 1 ) k j = 0 k ( 1 ) j = 2 j + 1 2 k + 1 2 j + 1 s ( 2 k + 1 , ) k 2 j 1 α 2 j .

In particular, when α = 0 in (3.1),

(3.2) = 0 2 k ( + 1 ) s ( 2 k + 1 , + 1 ) k = ( 1 ) k ( k ! ) 2 .

For 0 j k 1 , we have

(3.3) = 2 j + 1 2 k 1 2 j s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( k 1 ) 2 j = s ( 2 k 1 , 2 j ) .

Proof

In [14, p. 165, (12.1)], there exists the formula

(3.4) n ! z n = k = 0 n s ( n , k ) z k , z C , n 0 .

It is not difficult to verify that

(3.5) = 1 k [ ( 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] = = 0 k 1 ( 2 + α 2 ) = ( 1 ) k ( i α ) k ( i α + 1 ) k = ( 1 ) k i α Γ ( i α + k ) Γ ( i α k + 1 ) = ( 1 ) k i α ( 2 k 1 ) ! i α + k 1 2 k 1

for α C and k N , where i = 1 is the imaginary unit and α C . Substituting formula (3.4) into (3.5) results in

= 0 k 1 ( 2 + α 2 ) = ( 1 ) k i α = 0 2 k 1 s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( i α + k 1 ) = ( 1 ) k i α = 0 2 k 1 s ( 2 k 1 , ) j = 0 j ( i α ) j ( k 1 ) j

= ( 1 ) k j = 0 2 k 1 = j 2 k 1 j s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( k 1 ) j ( i α ) j + 1 = ( 1 ) k j = 0 2 k 1 = j 2 k 1 j s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( k 1 ) j α j + 1 cos ( j + 1 ) π 2 + i ( 1 ) k j = 0 2 k 1 = j 2 k 1 j s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( k 1 ) j α j + 1 sin ( j + 1 ) π 2

for α C and k N , where we used the identity

(3.6) i k = cos k π 2 + i sin k π 2 , k 0 .

As a result, equating the real and imaginary parts, we obtain

(3.7) = 0 k 1 ( 2 + α 2 ) = ( 1 ) k j = 0 2 k 1 cos ( j + 1 ) π 2 s ( 2 k 1 , j ) + = j + 1 2 k 1 j s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( k 1 ) j α j + 1

and

(3.8) j = 0 2 k 1 sin ( j + 1 ) π 2 s ( 2 k 1 , j ) + = j + 1 2 k 1 j s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( k 1 ) j α j + 1 = 0 .

Since cos ( j π ) = ( 1 ) j and cos ( 2 j + 1 ) π 2 = 0 for j Z , equality (3.7) can be simplified as (3.1).

Taking α 0 in (3.1) reduces to (3.2).

Since sin ( j π ) = 0 and sin ( 2 j + 1 ) π 2 = ( 1 ) j for j Z , equality (3.8) becomes

j = 0 k 1 ( 1 ) j s ( 2 k 1 , 2 j ) + = 2 j + 1 2 k 1 2 j s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( k 1 ) 2 j α 2 j + 1 = 0 .

Further regarding α as a variable leads to

( 1 ) j s ( 2 k 1 , 2 j ) + = 2 j + 1 2 k 1 2 j s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( k 1 ) 2 j = 0 ,

which is equivalent to the combinatorial identity (3.3). The proof of Lemma 3.1 is complete.□

Lemma 3.2

For k N and α C , we have

(3.9) = 1 k [ ( 2 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] = ( 1 ) k 2 2 k j = 0 2 k ( 1 ) j = 2 j 2 k s ( 2 k , ) 2 2 j ( 2 k 1 ) 2 j α 2 j .

In particular, when α = 0 in (3.9),

(3.10) = 0 2 k s ( 2 k , ) k 1 2 = ( 1 ) k ( 2 k 1 ) ! ! 2 k 2 .

For 0 j < k N , we have

(3.11) = 2 j + 1 2 k 2 j + 1 s ( 2 k , ) k 1 2 = 0 .

Proof

The identities in (3.5) can be rearranged as

= 1 k ( 2 + α 2 ) = ( 1 ) k + 1 ( i α ) k + 1 α 2 ( i α + 1 ) ( k + 1 ) = ( 1 ) k + 1 i Γ ( i α + k + 1 ) α Γ ( i α k ) = ( 1 ) k + 1 i ( 2 k + 1 ) ! α i α + k 2 k + 1

for α C { 0 } and k N . By this, we acquire

(3.12) = 1 k [ ( 2 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] = = 1 2 k ( 2 + α 2 ) = 1 k [ α 2 + ( 2 ) 2 ] = = 1 2 k ( 2 + α 2 ) 4 k = 1 k [ ( α / 2 ) 2 + 2 ] = 1 4 k ( 1 ) 2 k + 1 i Γ ( i α + 2 k + 1 ) α Γ ( i α 2 k ) 1 ( 1 ) k + 1 i α Γ ( i α / 2 k ) 2 Γ ( i α / 2 + k + 1 ) = ( 1 ) k 2 2 k + 1 Γ ( i α / 2 k ) Γ ( i α 2 k ) Γ ( i α + 2 k + 1 ) Γ ( i α / 2 + k + 1 )

for α C { 0 } and k N . Making use of the Gauss multiplication formula

Γ ( n z ) = n n z 1 / 2 ( 2 π ) ( n 1 ) / 2 k = 0 n 1 Γ z + k n

in [11, p. 256, 6.1.20] leads to

Γ ( i α 2 k ) Γ ( i α / 2 k ) = 1 Γ ( i α / 2 k ) 2 i α 2 k 1 / 2 ( 2 π ) 1 / 2 Γ i α 2 k Γ i α 2 k + 1 2 = 2 i α 2 k 1 π Γ 1 + i α 2 k

and

Γ ( i α + 2 k + 1 ) Γ ( i α / 2 + k + 1 ) = ( i α + 2 k ) Γ ( i α / 2 + k + 1 ) Γ ( 2 ( i α / 2 + k ) ) = ( i α + 2 k ) Γ ( i α / 2 + k + 1 ) 2 2 ( i α / 2 + k ) 1 / 2 ( 2 π ) 1 / 2 Γ ( i α / 2 + k ) Γ i α / 2 + k + 1 2 = 2 i α + 2 k π Γ 1 + i α 2 + k

for α C { 0 } and k N . Substituting these two equalities into (3.12), utilizing formula (3.4), interchanging the order of double sums, and employing identity (3.6) yield

= 1 k [ ( 2 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] = ( 1 ) k 2 2 k + 1 2 i α + 2 k π Γ 1 + i α 2 + k 2 i α 2 k 1 π Γ 1 + i α 2 k = ( 1 ) k 2 2 k Γ 1 + i α 2 + k Γ 1 + i α 2 k = ( 1 ) k 2 2 k ( 2 k ) ! i α 2 + k 1 2 2 k = ( 1 ) k 2 2 k = 0 2 k s ( 2 k , ) i α 2 + k 1 2 = ( 1 ) k 2 2 k = 0 2 k s ( 2 k , ) 2 j = 0 j ( i α ) j ( 2 k 1 ) j = ( 1 ) k 2 2 k j = 0 2 k = j 2 k s ( 2 k , ) 2 j ( 2 k 1 ) j ( i α ) j

= ( 1 ) k 2 2 k j = 0 2 k = j 2 k s ( 2 k , ) 2 j ( 2 k 1 ) j cos j π 2 α j + i ( 1 ) k 2 2 k j = 0 2 k = j 2 k s ( 2 k , ) 2 j ( 2 k 1 ) j sin j π 2 α j

for α C and k N . From the facts that cos ( j π ) = ( 1 ) j and cos ( 2 j + 1 ) π 2 = 0 for j Z , equating the above real part and simplifying produce identity (3.9).

From the facts that sin ( j π ) = 0 and sin ( 2 j + 1 ) π 2 = ( 1 ) j for j Z , the last imaginary part becomes

j = 0 k 1 ( 1 ) j = 2 j + 1 2 k s ( 2 k , ) 2 2 j + 1 ( 2 k 1 ) 2 j 1 α 2 j + 1 = 0 .

Regarding α as a variable means identity (3.11). The proof of Lemma 3.2 is complete.□

Remark 3.1

Formula (3.4) can be reformulated as

(3.13) ( z ) n = k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k s ( n , k ) z k .

Comparing this equation with definition (1.1), we can regard (3.1) and (3.9) in Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2 as generalizations of formula (3.13).

Remark 3.2

The identity (3.10) is a special case of identity (3.4) or (3.13).

In the monograph [14], we do not find the combinatorial identities (3.2), (3.3), and (3.11).

Remark 3.3

The combinatorial identities (3.2) and (3.10) can be rearranged as

(3.14) Q ( 2 , 2 k ) = ( 1 ) k ( k ! ) 2 , k N

and

(3.15) Q ( 1 , 2 k ) = ( 1 ) k ( 2 k 1 ) ! ! 2 k 2 , k N .

The combinatorial identity (3.14) is also derived in [27, Remark 6].

Due to the trivial result s ( n , n ) = 1 for n N 0 , the combinatorial identities (3.3) and (3.11) can be rearranged as

s ( 2 j + 1 , 2 j ) = j ( 2 j + 1 ) , Q ( 2 j + 1 , 2 m 1 ) = 0

for m 2 and j N 0 , and

= 1 2 m 2 j + 2 j + 1 s ( 2 j + 2 m , 2 j + ) j + m 1 2 = 0

for j N 0 and m N . On the other hand, we have

Q ( 2 j , 2 m ) = s ( 2 j + 2 m 1 , 2 j 1 ) + 2 j ( j + m 1 ) s ( 2 j + 2 m 1 , 2 j ) + 2 j ( j + m 1 ) = 1 2 m 1 1 + 1 2 j + 2 j s ( 2 j + 2 m 1 , 2 j + ) ( j + m 1 )

for j , m N . Can one give a simple form for the quantity

= 1 2 m 1 1 + 1 2 j + 2 j s ( 2 j + 2 m 1 , 2 j + ) ( j + m 1 )

for j , m N ? Can one discover more simple forms, similar to Q ( 1 , 2 k ) and Q ( 2 , 2 k ) in (3.14) and (3.15), of Q ( k , m ) for some k N and m 2 ?

Lemma 3.3

For α C and x < 1 , we have

(3.16) cosh ( α arcsin x ) = k = 0 = 1 k [ 4 ( 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! ,

(3.17) sinh ( α arcsin x ) = α k = 0 = 1 k [ ( 2 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] x 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! ,

(3.18) cosh ( α arccos x ) = k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k 1 ) ! ! = 1 k [ ( 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] ( x 1 ) k k ! ,

(3.19) cosh ( α arccos x ) = cosh α π 2 k = 0 = 1 k [ 4 ( 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! α sinh α π 2 k = 0 = 1 k [ ( 2 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] x 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! ,

(3.20) sinh ( α arccos x ) = sinh α π 2 k = 0 = 1 k [ 4 ( 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! α cosh α π 2 k = 0 = 1 k [ ( 2 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] x 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! ,

(3.21) cos ( α arcsin x ) = k = 0 = 1 k [ 4 ( 1 ) 2 α 2 ] x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! ,

(3.22) sin ( α arcsin x ) = α k = 0 = 1 k [ ( 2 1 ) 2 α 2 ] x 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! ,

(3.23) cos ( α arccos x ) = k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k 1 ) !! = 1 k 1 [ ( 1 ) 2 α 2 ] ( x 1 ) k k !

(3.24) = cos α π 2 k = 0 = 1 k [ 4 ( 1 ) 2 α 2 ] x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! + α sin α π 2 k = 0 = 1 k [ ( 2 1 ) 2 α 2 ] x 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! ,

(3.25) sin ( α arccos x ) = sin α π 2 k = 0 = 1 k [ 4 ( 1 ) 2 α 2 ] x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! α cos α π 2 k = 0 = 1 k [ ( 2 1 ) 2 α 2 ] x 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! ,

where ( 1 ) !! = 1 and any empty product is understood to be 1.

Proof

Let f α ( x ) = cosh ( α arcsin x ) . Then consecutive differentiations and simplifications give

f α ( x ) = α 1 x 2 sinh ( α arcsin x ) = α 1 x 2 f α 2 ( x ) 1 , ( 1 x 2 ) [ f α ( x ) ] 2 α 2 f α 2 ( x ) + α 2 = 0 , ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( x ) x f α ( x ) α 2 f α ( x ) = 0 , ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( 3 ) ( x ) 3 x f α ( x ) ( 1 + α 2 ) f α ( x ) = 0 .

Accordingly, the differential equation

(3.26) ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( k + 2 ) ( x ) ( 2 k + 1 ) x f α ( k + 1 ) ( x ) ( k 2 + α 2 ) f α ( k ) ( x ) = 0

is valid for k = 0 , 1 , respectively. Differentiating on both sides of (3.26) results in

( 1 x 2 ) f α ( k + 3 ) ( x ) ( 2 k + 3 ) x f α ( k + 2 ) ( x ) [ ( k + 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] f α ( k + 1 ) ( x ) = 0 .

By induction, the equation (3.26) is valid for all k 0 . Taking x 0 in (3.26) gives

(3.27) f α ( k + 2 ) ( 0 ) ( k 2 + α 2 ) f α ( k ) ( 0 ) = 0 , k 0 .

It is clear that f α ( 0 ) = 1 and f α ( 0 ) = 0 . Substituting these two initial values into the recursive relation (3.27) and consecutively recursing reveal f α ( 2 k 1 ) ( 0 ) = 0 and

f α ( 2 k ) ( 0 ) = = 1 k [ 4 ( 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] , k N .

Consequently, the series expansion (3.16) follows.

Let f α ( x ) = sinh ( α arcsin x ) . Then consecutive differentiations and simplifications give

f α ( x ) = α 1 x 2 cosh ( α arcsin x ) = α 1 x 2 f α 2 ( x ) + 1 , ( 1 x 2 ) [ f α ( x ) ] 2 α 2 f α 2 ( x ) α 2 = 0 , ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( x ) x f α ( x ) α 2 f α ( x ) = 0 , ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( 3 ) ( x ) 3 x f α ( x ) ( 1 + α 2 ) f α ( x ) = 0 .

By the same argument as above, the derivative f α ( k ) ( 0 ) for n 0 satisfy the recursive relation (3.27). Furthermore, from the facts that f α ( 0 ) = 0 and f α ( 0 ) = α , we conclude f α ( 2 k ) ( 0 ) = 0 and

f α ( 2 k + 1 ) ( 0 ) = α = 1 k [ ( 2 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] , k 0 .

Consequently, the series expansion (3.17) follows.

Let f α ( x ) = cosh ( α arccos x ) . Then successively differentiating yields

f α ( x ) = α 1 x 2 sinh ( α arccos x ) = α 1 x 2 f α 2 ( x ) 1 , ( 1 x 2 ) [ f α ( x ) ] 2 α 2 [ f α 2 ( x ) 1 ] = 0 , ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( x ) x f α ( x ) α 2 f α ( x ) = 0 , ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( x ) 3 x f α ( x ) ( 1 + α 2 ) f α ( x ) = 0 .

As argued above, we conclude that the derivatives f α ( k ) ( x ) for k 0 satisfy equation (3.26). Letting x 1 in (3.26) gives

(3.28) ( 2 k + 1 ) f α ( k + 1 ) ( 1 ) + ( k 2 + α 2 ) f α ( k ) ( 1 ) = 0 .

Setting x 0 in (3.26) leads to (3.27). It is easy to see that

f α ( 1 ) = 1 , f α ( 1 ) = α 2 , f α ( 0 ) = cosh α π 2 , f α ( 0 ) = α sinh α π 2 .

Substituting these four initial values into (3.28) and inductively recursing reveal

f α ( k ) ( 1 ) = ( 1 ) k = 1 k [ ( 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] ( 2 k 1 ) ! ! , f α ( 2 k ) ( 0 ) = cosh α π 2 = 1 k [ 4 ( 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] ,

and

f α ( 2 k + 1 ) ( 0 ) = α sinh α π 2 = 1 k [ ( 2 1 ) 2 + α 2 ]

for k 0 . Consequently, the series expansions (3.18) and (3.19) follow.

Let f α ( x ) = sinh ( α arccos x ) . Then

f α ( x ) = α 1 x 2 cosh ( α arccos x ) = α 1 x 2 f α 2 ( x ) + 1 , ( 1 x 2 ) [ f α ( x ) ] 2 α 2 [ f α 2 ( x ) + 1 ] = 0 , ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( x ) x f α ( x ) α 2 f α ( x ) = 0 ,

and, inductively, the derivatives f α ( k ) ( x ) for k 0 satisfy equations (3.26) and (3.27). Since f α ( 0 ) = sinh α π 2 and f α ( 0 ) = α cosh α π 2 , we obtain

f α ( 2 k ) ( 0 ) = = 1 k [ 4 ( 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] sinh α π 2

and

f α ( 2 k + 1 ) ( 0 ) = α = 1 k [ ( 2 1 ) 2 + α 2 ] cosh α π 2

for k 0 . Consequently, the series expansion (3.20) follows.

Let f α ( x ) = cos ( α arcsin x ) . Then

f α ( x ) = α 1 x 2 sin ( α arcsin x ) = α 1 x 2 1 f α 2 ( x ) ( 1 x 2 ) [ f α ( x ) ] 2 α 2 [ 1 f α 2 ( x ) ] = 0 , ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( x ) x f α ( x ) + α 2 f α ( x ) = 0 , ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( 3 ) ( x ) 3 x f α ( x ) + ( α 2 1 ) f α ( x ) = 0 , ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( 4 ) ( x ) 5 x f α ( 3 ) ( x ) + ( α 2 4 ) f α ( x ) = 0 ,

and, inductively,

(3.29) ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( k + 2 ) ( x ) ( 2 k + 1 ) x f α ( k + 1 ) ( x ) + ( α 2 k 2 ) f α ( k ) ( x ) = 0 , k 0 .

Letting x 0 in (3.29) results in

(3.30) f α ( k + 2 ) ( 0 ) + ( α 2 k 2 ) f α ( k ) ( 0 ) = 0 , k 0 .

Recusing the relation (3.30) and considering f α ( 0 ) = 1 and f α ( 0 ) = 0 arrive at

f ( 2 k ) ( 0 ) = = 1 k [ 4 ( 1 ) 2 α 2 ] and f ( 2 k + 1 ) ( 0 ) = 0

for k 0 . Consequently, the series expansion (3.21) is valid.

Let f α ( x ) = sin ( α arcsin x ) . Then

f α ( x ) = α 1 x 2 cos ( α arcsin x ) = α 1 x 2 1 f α 2 ( x ) ( 1 x 2 ) [ f α ( x ) ] 2 α 2 [ 1 f α 2 ( x ) ] = 0 , ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( x ) x f α ( x ) + α 2 f α ( x ) = 0 , ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( 3 ) ( x ) 3 x f α ( x ) + ( α 2 1 ) f α ( x ) = 0 , ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( 4 ) ( x ) 5 x f α ( 3 ) ( x ) + ( α 2 4 ) f α ( x ) = 0 ,

and, inductively,

(3.31) ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( k + 2 ) ( x ) ( 2 k + 1 ) x f α ( k + 1 ) ( x ) + ( α 2 k 2 ) f α ( k ) ( x ) = 0 , k 0 .

Letting x 0 in (3.31) results in

(3.32) f α ( k + 2 ) ( 0 ) + ( α 2 k 2 ) f α ( k ) ( 0 ) = 0 , k 0 .

Considering f α ( 0 ) = 0 and f α ( 0 ) = α in (3.32) and recusing the relation (3.32) arrive at

f ( 2 k ) ( 0 ) = 0 and f ( 2 k + 1 ) ( 0 ) = α = 1 k [ ( 2 1 ) 2 α 2 ]

for k 0 . Consequently, the series expansion (3.22) is valid.

Let f α ( x ) = cos ( α arccos x ) . Then the derivatives f α ( k ) ( x ) and f α ( k ) ( 0 ) satisfy

f α ( x ) = α 1 x 2 sin ( α arccos x ) = α 1 x 2 1 f α 2 ( x ) , ( 1 x 2 ) [ f α ( x ) ] 2 α 2 [ 1 f α 2 ( x ) ] = 0 ,

and, inductively, the differential equation (3.29). Setting x 1 in (3.29) acquires

(3.33) ( 2 k + 1 ) f α ( k + 1 ) ( 1 ) = ( α 2 k 2 ) f α ( k ) ( 1 ) , k 0 .

Letting x 0 in (3.29) leads to (3.30). Since f α ( 1 ) = 1 , f α ( 0 ) = cos α π 2 , and f α ( 0 ) = α sin α π 2 , from (3.33) and (3.30), we obtain

f α ( k ) ( 1 ) = = 0 k 1 α 2 2 2 + 1 , f α ( 2 k ) ( 0 ) = cos α π 2 = 1 k [ 4 ( 1 ) 2 α 2 ]

and

f α ( 2 k + 1 ) ( 0 ) = α sin α π 2 = 1 k [ ( 2 1 ) 2 α 2 ]

for k 0 . As a result, we acquire the series expansions (3.23) and (3.24).

Let f α ( x ) = sin ( α arccos x ) . Then

f α ( x ) = α 1 x 2 cos ( α arccos x ) = α 1 x 2 1 f α 2 ( x ) , ( 1 x 2 ) [ f α ( x ) ] 2 α 2 [ 1 f α 2 ( x ) ] = 0 , ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( x ) x f α ( x ) + α 2 f α ( x ) = 0 , ( 1 x 2 ) f α ( 3 ) ( x ) 3 x f α ( x ) + ( α 2 1 ) f α ( x ) = 0 ,

and, inductively, the differential equation (3.29) and the recursive relation (3.30) are valid. Employing the recursive relation (3.30) and using

f α ( 0 ) = sin α π 2 and f α ( 0 ) = α cos α π 2

result in

f α ( 2 k ) ( 0 ) = sin α π 2 = 1 k [ 4 ( 1 ) 2 α 2 ]

and

f α ( 2 k + 1 ) ( 0 ) = α cos α π 2 = 1 k [ ( 2 1 ) 2 α 2 ]

for k 0 . Accordingly, the series expansion (3.25) follows. The proof of Lemma 3.3 is complete.□

Remark 3.4

On [34, pp. 1016–1017], four relations

sin ( n arcsin z ) n z = F 1 2 1 + n 2 , 1 n 2 ; 3 2 ; z 2 , sin ( n arcsin z ) n z 1 z 2 = F 1 2 1 + n 2 , 1 n 2 ; 3 2 ; z 2 , cos ( n arcsin z ) = F 1 2 n 2 , n 2 ; 1 2 ; z 2 , cos ( n arcsin z ) 1 z 2 = F 1 2 1 + n 2 , 1 n 2 ; 1 2 ; z 2

for n N were collected, where the Gauss hypergeometric function F 1 2 ( α , β ; γ ; z ) can be defined [3, Section 5.9] by

F 1 2 ( α , β ; γ ; z ) = k = 0 ( α ) k ( β ) k ( γ ) k z k k ! , z < 1

for complex numbers α , β C { 0 } and γ C { 0 , 1 , 2 , } , where ( α ) k , ( β ) k , and ( γ ) k are defined by (1.1) or (1.2).

In particular, Maclaurin’s series expansion

cos ( arcsin t ) = 1 + k = 0 ( 1 ) k 2 2 k 2 k 1 2 2 k + 1 t 2 ( k + 1 ) k + 1

was derived in [27, Remark 18], where extended binomial coefficient z w is defined by (1.3).

Remark 3.5

In the article [35], among other things, three authors established series expansions at x = 0 or x = 1 of the functions

exp ( α arccos x ) , exp ( α arccos x ) 1 x 2 , arccos x 1 x 2 , sin ( α arccos x ) 1 x 2 , exp ( α arccosh x ) , sin ( α arccosh x ) x 2 1 , sinh ( α arccosh x ) x 2 1 , cos ( α arccos x ) , cosh ( α arccos x ) , cos ( α arccosh x ) , cosh ( α arccosh x ) , sin ( α arccos x ) , sinh ( α arccos x ) , cos ( α arccos x ) 1 x 2 , cosh ( α arccos x ) 1 x 2 , cos ( α arccosh x ) 1 x 2 , sinh ( α arccos x ) 1 x 2 , cosh ( α arccosh x ) 1 x 2

for α C { 0 } in terms of the Gauss hypergeometric function F 1 2 ( α , β ; γ ; z ) .

By the way, we point out that the series expansions (2.1), (4.1), (4.3), (4.4), (4.7), and (4.9) in the article [35] should be wrong.

Lemma 3.4

Let n k 0 and α , β C .

  1. The Faà di Bruno formula can be described in terms of partial Bell polynomials B n , k by

    (3.34) d n d t n f h ( t ) = k = 0 n f ( k ) ( h ( t ) ) B n , k ( h ( t ) , h ( t ) , , h ( n k + 1 ) ( t ) ) , n N 0 .

  2. Partial Bell polynomials B n , k satisfy the identities

    (3.35) B n , k ( α β x 1 , α β 2 x 2 , , α β n k + 1 x n k + 1 ) = α k β n B n , k ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n k + 1 ) ,

    (3.36) B n , k ( α , 1 , 0 , , 0 ) = ( n k ) ! 2 n k n k k n k α 2 k n ,

    (3.37) B n , k ( ( 1 ) ! ! , 1 ! ! , 3 ! ! , , [ 2 ( n k ) 1 ] ! ! ) = [ 2 ( n k ) 1 ] ! ! 2 n k 1 2 ( n k ) ,

    and

    (3.38) 1 k ! m = 1 x m t m m ! k = n = k B n , k ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n k + 1 ) t n n ! .

These formulas in Lemma 3.4 can be found in [8, p. 412], [9, pp. 134–135 and 139], [36, Theorem 4.1], [37, p. 169, (3.6)], and [38, Theorem 1.2], respectively. These identities in Lemma 3.4 can also be found in the survey and review article [12].

4 Taylor’s series expansions of ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) k and ( arccosh x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) k

In this section, by virtue of some conclusions in Lemmas 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3, we establish Taylor’s series expansions around x = 1 of the functions ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) k and ( arccosh x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) k in terms of Q ( k , m ) defined by formula (2.3).

Theorem 4.1

For k N and x < 1 , we have

(4.1) ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) k = 1 + ( 2 k ) ! n = 1 Q ( 2 k , 2 n ) ( 2 k + 2 n ) ! [ 2 ( x 1 ) ] n

and

(4.2) ( arccosh x ) 2 2 ( x 1 ) k = 1 + ( 2 k ) ! n = 1 Q ( 2 k , 2 n ) ( 2 k + 2 n ) ! [ 2 ( x 1 ) ] n ,

where Q ( 2 k , 2 n ) is defined by (2.3).

Proof

Replacing α by i α in (3.1) leads to

(4.3) = 1 k ( 2 α 2 ) = ( 1 ) k j = 0 k = 2 j + 1 2 k + 1 2 j + 1 s ( 2 k + 1 , ) k 2 j 1 α 2 j .

From Taylor’s series expansion (3.23) and identity (4.3), it follows that

k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( α arccos x ) 2 k ( 2 k ) ! = 1 + ( x 1 ) α 2 α 2 k = 2 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k 1 ) ! ! = 1 k 1 ( 2 α 2 ) ( x 1 ) k k ! = 1 + ( x 1 ) α 2 + α 2 k = 2 1 ( 2 k 1 ) ! ! j = 0 k 1 α 2 j = 2 j + 1 2 k 1 2 j + 1 s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( k 1 ) 2 j 1 ( x 1 ) k k ! = 1 + ( x 1 ) α 2 + α 2 k = 2 1 ( 2 k 1 ) ! ! = 1 2 k 1 s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( k 1 ) 1 ( x 1 ) k k ! + α 2 k = 2 1 ( 2 k 1 ) ! ! ( x 1 ) k k ! j = 2 k α 2 j 2 = 2 j 1 2 k 1 2 j 1 s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( k 1 ) 2 j + 1 = 1 + ( x 1 ) α 2 + α 2 k = 2 1 ( 2 k 1 ) ! ! = 1 2 k 1 s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( k 1 ) 1 ( x 1 ) k k ! + k = 2 m = k 1 ( 2 m 1 ) ! ! ( x 1 ) m m ! = 2 k 1 2 m 1 2 k 1 s ( 2 m 1 , ) ( m 1 ) 2 k + 1 α 2 k .

This means that

( arccos x ) 2 2 ! = x 1 + k = 2 1 ( 2 k 1 ) ! ! = 1 2 k 1 s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( k 1 ) 1 ( x 1 ) k k ! = x 1 + k = 1 = 0 2 k ( + 1 ) s ( 2 k + 1 , + 1 ) k [ 2 ( x 1 ) ] k + 1 ( 2 k + 2 ) ! ,

where we used identity (3.2) in Lemma 3.1 or identity (3.14), and that

( 1 ) k ( arccos x ) 2 k ( 2 k ) ! = m = k = 2 k 1 2 m 1 2 k 1 s ( 2 m 1 , ) ( m 1 ) 2 k + 1 ( x 1 ) m ( 2 m 1 ) ! ! m ! = m = 0 Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) [ 2 ( x 1 ) ] m + k ( 2 k + 2 m ) !

for k 2 . Consequently, the series expansions

(4.4) ( arccos x ) 2 2 ! = m = 0 m ! ( 2 m + 1 ) ! ! ( 1 x ) m + 1 m + 1 , x < 1

and

(4.5) ( arccos x ) 2 k ( 2 k ) ! = m = 0 ( 1 ) m Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] m + k ( 2 k + 2 m ) !

for k 2 and x < 1 are valid.

By similar arguments as done above, from the series expansion (3.18), we can also recover the series expansions (4.4) and (4.5).

The series expansions (4.4) and (4.5) can be reformulated as

( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) = 1 + m = 1 ( m ! ) 2 ( 2 m + 1 ) ! ! ( m + 1 ) ( 1 x ) m m !

and

( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) k = 1 + m = 1 ( 1 ) m ( 2 m 1 ) ! ! 2 m + 2 k 2 k Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) ( 1 x ) m m !

for k 2 . Making use of identity (3.2) or (3.14), we obtain

( 1 ) m ( 2 m 1 ) ! ! 2 m + 2 2 Q ( 2 , 2 m ) = ( m ! ) 2 ( 2 m + 1 ) ! ! ( m + 1 ) , m N .

Consequently, the series expansions (4.4) and (4.5) can be unified as the series expansion (4.1).

By the relation

(4.6) arccos x = i arccosh x ,

from (4.1), we deduce (4.2). The proof of Theorem 4.1 is complete.□

Corollary 4.1

For k N and x < 1 , we have

(4.7) ( π arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 + x ) k = 1 + ( 2 k ) ! m = 1 ( 1 ) m Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) ( 2 k + 2 m ) ! [ 2 ( x + 1 ) ] m

and

(4.8) ( 1 ) k ( π + i arccosh x ) 2 2 ( 1 + x ) k = 1 + ( 2 k ) ! m = 1 ( 1 ) m Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) ( 2 k + 2 m ) ! [ 2 ( x + 1 ) ] m ,

where Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) is defined by (2.3).

Proof

This follows from replacing x by x in (4.1) and (4.2) and utilizing the relations arccos x + arccos ( x ) = π and (4.6).□

Corollary 4.2

For k N , we have

(4.9) π 2 8 k = 1 + ( 2 k ) ! m = 1 ( 1 ) m 2 m Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) ( 2 k + 2 m ) ! .

In particular, we have

(4.10) π 2 8 = m = 1 2 m m 2 1 2 m m .

Proof

The series representation (4.9) of π 2 k follows from letting x = 0 in either (4.1), (4.2), (4.7), or (4.8).

The series representation (4.10) follows from taking k = 1 in (4.9), or setting k = 2 in (2.5), and then making use of identity (3.2) or (3.14).□

Remark 4.1

The series representation (4.10) recovers a conclusion in [39, Theorem 5.1].

As for series representations of π 2 , in [40, p. 453, (14)] and the article [41], among other things, we find

(4.11) π 2 6 = m = 0 1 ( m + 1 ) 2 , π 2 8 = m = 0 1 ( 2 m + 1 ) 2 , π 2 12 = m = 0 ( 1 ) m ( m + 1 ) 2 , π 2 18 = m = 1 1 m 2 1 2 m m ,

which are different from (4.10). The last series representation in (4.11) is derived from letting k = 2 and x = 1 2 in (2.2).

Because

(4.12) lim m 2 m m 2 8 2 m m 1 / m = 1 2 , lim m 6 ( m + 1 ) 2 1 / m = 1 , lim m 8 ( 2 m + 1 ) 2 1 / m = 1 , lim m ( 1 ) m 12 ( m + 1 ) 2 1 / m = 1 , lim m 18 m 2 1 2 m m 1 / m = 1 4 ,

we regard that the last series representation in (4.11) in [40, p. 453, (14)] converges to π 2 quicker than (4.10) and other three in (4.11). The first unsolved problem posed on December 13, 2010 by Herbert S. Wilf (1931–2012) is about the convergent speed of rational approximations of the circular constant π . For more details on this unsolved problem, see [39, Remark 7.7].

For k N , let

L ( k ) = lim m ( 2 k ) ! ( 1 ) m 2 m Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) ( 2 k + 2 m ) ! 1 / m = 2 lim m ( 1 ) m Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) ( 2 k + 2 m ) ! 1 / m .

The first limit in (4.12) means that L ( 1 ) = 1 2 . What is the convergent speed of the hypergeometric term in (4.9) for k 2 ? Equivalently speaking, what is the limit L ( k ) for k 2 ? Is the limit L ( k ) a decreasing sequence in k 2 ? What is the limit lim k [ L ( k ) ] 1 / k ?

Corollary 4.3

For k , m N , we have

( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) k ( m ) x = 1 = ( 2 k ) ! ( 2 m ) ! ! ( 2 k + 2 m ) ! Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) , ( arccosh x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) k ( m ) x = 1 = ( 1 ) k ( 2 k ) ! ( 2 m ) ! ! ( 2 k + 2 m ) ! Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) , ( π arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 + x ) k ( m ) x = ( 1 ) + = ( 1 ) m ( 2 k ) ! ( 2 m ) ! ! ( 2 k + 2 m ) ! Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) ,

and

( π + i arccosh x ) 2 2 ( 1 + x ) k ( m ) x = ( 1 ) + = ( 1 ) k + m ( 2 k ) ! ( 2 m ) ! ! ( 2 k + 2 m ) ! Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) ,

where Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) is defined by (2.3).

Proof

These derivatives follow from series expansions (4.1), (4.2), (4.7), and (4.8).□

Corollary 4.4

For k , n N , we have

(4.13) [ ( arccos x ) 2 k ] ( n ) x = 1 = 0 , n < k ; ( 1 ) k ( 2 k ) ! ! , n = k ; ( 1 ) k ( 2 k ) ! ( 2 n 1 ) ! ! Q ( 2 k , 2 n 2 k ) , n > k

and

(4.14) [ ( arccosh x ) 2 k ] ( n ) x = 1 = 0 , n < k ; ( 2 k ) ! ! , n = k ; ( 2 k ) ! ( 2 n 1 ) ! ! Q ( 2 k , 2 n 2 k ) , n > k .

Proof

For k N and x < 1 , the series expansions (4.1) and (4.2) can be reformulated as

(4.15) ( arccos x ) 2 k = ( 1 ) k ( 2 k ) ! ! ( x 1 ) k k ! + ( 1 ) k ( 2 k ) ! m = 1 Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) ( 2 k + 2 m 1 ) ! ! ( x 1 ) k + m ( k + m ) !

and

(4.16) ( arccosh x ) 2 k = ( 2 k ) ! ! ( x 1 ) k k ! + ( 2 k ) ! m = 1 Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) ( 2 k + 2 m 1 ) ! ! ( x 1 ) k + m ( k + m ) ! .

These forms of series expansions (4.15) and (4.16) imply the formulas in (4.13) and (4.14).□

Corollary 4.5

For k N and x < 1 , we have

(4.17) ( arccos x ) 2 k = j = 0 k ( 1 ) j 2 k k j + ( 2 k ) ! m = 1 ( 1 ) m ( k + m ) ! Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) ( 2 k + 2 m 1 ) ! ! k + m j x j + ( 1 ) k ( 2 k ) ! j = k + 1 ( 1 ) j m = 0 ( 1 ) j + m ( j + m ) ! Q ( 2 k , 2 j + 2 m 2 k ) ( 2 j 1 ) ! ! j + m j x j

and

(4.18) ( arccosh x ) 2 k = ( 1 ) k j = 0 k ( 1 ) j 2 k k j + ( 2 k ) ! m = 1 ( 1 ) m ( k + m ) ! Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) ( 2 k + 2 m 1 ) ! ! k + m j x j + ( 2 k ) ! j = k + 1 ( 1 ) j m = 0 ( 1 ) j + m ( j + m ) ! Q ( 2 k , 2 j + 2 m 2 k ) ( 2 j 1 ) ! ! j + m j x j ,

where Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) is given by (2.3).

Proof

For k N and x < 1 , by the binomial theorem, the series expansion (4.15) can be rewritten as

( arccos x ) 2 k = 2 k j = 0 k ( 1 ) j k j x j + ( 2 k ) ! m = 1 j = 0 k + m ( 1 ) m j ( k + m ) ! Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) ( 2 k + 2 m 1 ) ! ! k + m j x j = 2 k j = 0 k ( 1 ) j k j x j + ( 2 k ) ! j = 0 k m = 1 + j = k + 1 m = j k ( 1 ) m j ( k + m ) ! Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) ( 2 k + 2 m 1 ) ! ! k + m j x j = j = 0 k ( 1 ) j 2 k k j + ( 2 k ) ! m = 1 ( 1 ) m ( k + m ) ! Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) ( 2 k + 2 m 1 ) ! ! k + m j x j + ( 2 k ) ! j = k + 1 ( 1 ) j m = j k ( 1 ) m ( k + m ) ! Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) ( 2 k + 2 m 1 ) ! ! k + m j x j .

The series expansion (4.17) is thus proved.

Similarly, from (4.16), we conclude (4.18). Theorem 4.5 is thus proved.□

Remark 4.2

What are closed-form expressions of coefficients in Maclaurin’s series expansion around the point x = 0 of the real power ( arccos x ) α for α R and x < 1 ? For answers to this question, please refer to [39, Section 3].

Corollary 4.6

For m , n N , we have

(4.19) [ ( arccos x ) 2 n 1 ] ( m ) x = 1 = 0 , m < n ; , m n

and

(4.20) [ ( arccosh x ) 2 n 1 ] ( m ) x = 1 = 0 , m < n ; , m n .

Consequently, the functions ( arccos x ) 2 n 1 and ( arccosh x ) 2 n 1 for n N cannot be expanded into Taylor’s series expansions at the point x = 1 .

Proof

It is easy to verify that

(4.21) ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) , x 1 .

By the Faà di Bruno formula (3.34) and in the light of identities (3.35) and (3.36), we obtain

1 1 x 2 ( m ) = j = 0 m 1 2 j ( 1 x 2 ) 1 / 2 j B m , j ( 2 x , 2 , 0 , , 0 ) = j = 0 m ( 1 ) j ( 2 j 1 ) ! ! 2 j ( 2 ) j ( 1 x 2 ) j + 1 / 2 B m , j ( x , 1 , 0 , , 0 )

= j = 0 m ( 2 j 1 ) ! ! ( 1 x 2 ) j + 1 / 2 ( m j ) ! 2 m j m j j m j x 2 j m = j = 0 m ( 2 j 1 ) ! ! ( 1 + x ) j + 1 / 2 ( m j ) ! 2 m j m j j m j x 2 j m ( 1 x ) j + 1 / 2

for m N 0 . This implies that

(4.22) 1 1 x 2 ( m ) ( 2 m 1 ) ! ! [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] m + 1 / 2 , x 1 , m N 0 .

Utilizing the Faà di Bruno formula (3.34), employing identities (3.35) and (3.37), and making use of (4.21) and (4.22), we acquire

[ ( arccos x ) 2 n 1 ] ( m ) = j = 0 m 2 n 1 j ( arccos x ) 2 n j 1 B m , j 1 1 x 2 , 1 1 x 2 , , 1 1 x 2 ( m j ) j = 0 m 2 n 1 j [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] n ( j + 1 ) / 2 ( 1 ) j B m , j ( 1 ) ! ! [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] 1 2 , 1 ! ! [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] 3 2 , 3 ! ! [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] 5 2 , , [ 2 ( m j ) 1 ] ! ! [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] m j + 1 2 = j = 0 m ( 1 ) j 2 n 1 j [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] n ( j + 1 ) 2 [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] j 2 [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] m B m , j ( ( 1 ) ! ! , 1 ! ! , 3 ! ! , , [ 2 ( m j ) 1 ] ! ! ) = [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] n m 1 2 j = 0 m ( 1 ) j 2 n 1 j [ 2 ( m j ) 1 ] ! ! 2 m j 1 2 ( m j ) 0 , n > m , n m

as x 1 for m , n N . The results in (4.19) are thus proved.

Substituting (4.6) into (4.19) leads to (4.20). Theorem 4.6 is therefore proved.□

Corollary 4.7

For k N 0 , we have

(4.23) j = 0 k ( 1 ) j 2 k j [ 2 ( k j ) 1 ] ! ! 2 k j 1 2 ( k j ) = ( 1 ) k ( 2 k ) ! ! .

Proof

As done in the proof of Theorem 4.6, we arrive at

[ ( arccos x ) 2 k ] ( n ) = j = 0 n 2 k j ( arccos x ) 2 k j B n , j 1 1 x 2 , 1 1 x 2 , , 1 1 x 2 ( n j ) j = 0 n 2 k j [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] k j 2 ( 1 ) j B n , j ( 1 ) ! ! [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] 1 2 , 1 ! ! [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] 3 2 , , [ 2 ( n j ) 1 ] ! ! [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] n j + 1 2 = j = 0 n ( 1 ) j 2 k j [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] k j 2 [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] j 2 [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] n B n , j ( ( 1 ) ! ! , 1 ! ! , 3 ! ! , , [ 2 ( n j ) 1 ] ! ! ) = [ 2 ( 1 x ) ] k n j = 0 n ( 1 ) j 2 k j [ 2 ( n j ) 1 ] ! ! 2 n j 1 2 ( n j ) 0 , k > n j = 0 k ( 1 ) j 2 k j [ 2 ( k j ) 1 ] ! ! 2 k j 1 2 ( k j ) , k = n

as x 1 for k , n N . Comparing this result with (4.13) gives (4.23).□

Remark 4.3

Identity (4.23) is similar to

k = 0 n k ! [ 2 ( n k ) 1 ] ! ! 2 n k 1 2 ( n k ) = ( 2 n 1 ) ! ! , n N 0 ,

which was established in [42, Theorem 4.2] and [43, p. 10, (3.12)], respectively.

5 Taylor’s series expansions at x = 1 of ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) α

In this section, via establishing a closed-form expression for the specific partial Bell polynomials at a sequence of the derivatives at x = 1 of the function ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) α , we present Taylor’s series expansion at x = 1 of the function ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) α for α R .

Theorem 5.1

For m k N , we have

(5.1) B m , k ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) x = 1 , ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) x = 1 , , ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) ( m k + 1 ) x = 1 = 2 k B m , k 1 12 , 2 45 , 3 70 , 32 525 , 80 693 , , ( 2 m 2 k + 2 ) ! ! ( 2 m 2 k + 4 ) ! Q ( 2 , 2 m 2 k + 2 ) = ( 2 ) k [ 2 ( m k ) ] ! ! m k j = 1 k ( 1 ) j ( 2 j ) ! k j Q ( 2 j , 2 m ) ( 2 j + 2 m ) ! ,

where Q ( 2 j , 2 m ) is defined by (2.3).

Proof

Let

x m = ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) ( m ) x = 1 , m N .

Then, from (3.38) and (4.1), it follows that

B n + k , k ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n + 1 ) = n + k k lim t 0 d n d t n m = 0 x m + 1 ( m + 1 ) ! t m k = n + k k lim t 0 d n d t n 1 t m = 1 ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) ( m ) x = 1 t m m ! k = n + k k lim x 1 d n d x n 1 x 1 m = 1 ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) ( m ) x = 1 ( x 1 ) m m ! k = n + k k lim x 1 d n d x n 1 x 1 ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) 1 k = n + k k lim x 1 d n d x n 1 ( x 1 ) k j = 0 k ( 1 ) k j k j ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) j

= n + k k lim x 1 d n d x n ( 1 ) k ( x 1 ) k + 1 ( x 1 ) k j = 1 k ( 1 ) k j k j 1 + ( 2 j ) ! m = 1 Q ( 2 j , 2 m ) ( 2 j + 2 m ) ! [ 2 ( x 1 ) ] m = ( 1 ) k n + k k lim x 1 d n d x n m = 1 2 m j = 1 k ( 1 ) j ( 2 j ) ! k j Q ( 2 j , 2 m ) ( 2 j + 2 m ) ! ( x 1 ) m k

for k N . This implies that

(5.2) j = 1 k ( 1 ) j ( 2 j ) ! k j Q ( 2 j , 2 m ) ( 2 j + 2 m ) ! = 0 , 1 m < k .

Accordingly, we derive

B n + k , k ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n + 1 ) = ( 1 ) k n + k k lim x 1 d n d x n m = k 2 m j = 1 k ( 1 ) j ( 2 j ) ! k j Q ( 2 j , 2 m ) ( 2 j + 2 m ) ! ( x 1 ) m k = ( 2 ) k n + k k lim x 1 d n d x n m = 0 2 m j = 1 k ( 1 ) j ( 2 j ) ! k j Q ( 2 j , 2 m + 2 k ) ( 2 j + 2 m + 2 k ) ! ( x 1 ) m = ( 2 ) k n + k k lim x 1 m = n 2 m j = 1 k ( 1 ) j ( 2 j ) ! k j Q ( 2 j , 2 m + 2 k ) ( 2 j + 2 m + 2 k ) ! m n ( x 1 ) m n = ( 2 ) k ( 2 n ) ! ! n + k k j = 1 k ( 1 ) j ( 2 j ) ! k j Q ( 2 j , 2 n + 2 k ) ( 2 j + 2 n + 2 k ) !

for n k N . Replacing n + k by m results in

B m , k ( x 1 , x 2 , , x m k + 1 ) = ( 2 ) k [ 2 ( m k ) ] ! ! m k j = 1 k ( 1 ) j ( 2 j ) ! k j Q ( 2 j , 2 m ) ( 2 j + 2 m ) !

for m k N . The required result is thus proved.□

Theorem 5.2

For α R , we have

(5.3) ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) α = 1 + n = 1 j = 1 n ( 1 ) j α j j ! = 1 j ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ! j Q ( 2 , 2 n ) ( 2 + 2 n ) ! [ 2 ( x 1 ) ] n .

Proof

By virtue of the Faà di Bruno formula (3.34) and formula (5.1) in Theorem 5.1, we obtain

( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) α ( n ) = j = 1 n α j ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) α j B n , j ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) , , ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) ( n j + 1 )

for n N . Taking the limit x 1 and employing (5.1) in Theorem 5.1 lead to

lim x 1 ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) α ( n ) = j = 1 n α j B n , j lim x 1 ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) , , lim x 1 ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) ( n j + 1 ) = j = 1 n α j ( 2 ) j [ 2 ( n j ) ] ! ! n j = 1 j ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ! j Q ( 2 , 2 n ) ( 2 + 2 n ) !

for n N . Consequently, the required result (5.3) is proved.□

Corollary 5.1

For k , n N , we have

(5.4) j = 1 n ( 1 ) j k j j ! = 1 j ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ! j Q ( 2 , 2 n ) ( 2 + 2 n ) ! = ( 2 k ) ! Q ( 2 k , 2 n ) ( 2 k + 2 n ) ! .

Proof

This follows from letting α = k N in (5.3) and equating coefficients of factors ( x 1 ) n in (4.1).□

Corollary 5.2

For α R , we have

(5.5) π 2 9 α = 1 + n = 1 ( 1 ) n j = 1 n ( 1 ) j α j j ! = 1 j ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ! j Q ( 2 , 2 n ) ( 2 + 2 n ) ! .

Proof

This follows from setting x = 1 2 in (5.3).□

Remark 5.1

Formula (5.1) in Theorem 5.1 can be used to compute Taylor’s series expansions of functions like f ( arccos x ) 2 2 ( 1 x ) around the point x = 1 , only if all the derivatives of f ( x ) at x = 1 are explicitly computable.

6 Recovering Maclaurin’s series expansion at x = 0 of arcsin x x k

In this section, by virtue of some conclusions in Lemmas 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3, we recover Maclaurin’s series expansions (2.2) and (2.4) in Theorems 2.1 and 2.2.

It is easy to see that

cosh t = e t + e t 2 = k = 0 t 2 k ( 2 k ) ! .

Then, making use of identity (3.1) in Lemma 3.1, the series expansion (3.16) can be reformulated as

k = 0 ( arcsin x ) 2 k ( 2 k ) ! α 2 k = 1 + x 2 2 α 2 + α 2 k = 2 4 k 1 = 1 k 1 2 + α 2 2 x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! = 1 + x 2 2 α 2 + k = 2 ( 4 ) k 1 x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! j = 1 k ( 1 ) j 1 4 j 1 = 2 j 1 2 k 1 2 j 1 s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( k 1 ) 2 j + 1 α 2 j = 1 + x 2 2 α 2 + α 2 k = 2 ( 4 ) k 1 x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! = 1 2 k 1 s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( k 1 ) 1 + k = 2 x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! j = 2 k ( 4 ) k j = 2 j 1 2 k 1 2 j 1 s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( k 1 ) 2 j + 1 α 2 j = 1 + x 2 2 α 2 + α 2 k = 2 ( 4 ) k 1 x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! ( 1 ) k 1 [ ( k 1 ) ! ] 2 + j = 2 k = j x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! ( 4 ) k j = 2 j 1 2 k 1 2 j 1 s ( 2 k 1 , ) ( k 1 ) 2 j + 1 α 2 j = 1 + x 2 2 α 2 + α 2 k = 2 [ ( 2 k 2 ) ! ! ] 2 x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! + k = 2 m = k x 2 m ( 2 m ) ! ( 4 ) m k = 2 k 1 2 m 1 2 k 1 s ( 2 m 1 , ) ( m 1 ) 2 k + 1 α 2 k ,

where we used identity (3.2) or (3.14). Regarding α as a variable and equating coefficients of α 2 k we arrive at

(6.1) ( arcsin x ) 2 2 = x 2 2 + k = 2 [ ( 2 k 2 ) ! ! ] 2 x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! = 1 2 k = 1 ( 2 k 2 ) ! ! ( 2 k 1 ) ! ! x 2 k k

and

(6.2) ( arcsin x ) 2 k ( 2 k ) ! = m = k ( 4 ) m k = 2 k 1 2 m 1 2 k 1 s ( 2 m 1 , ) ( m 1 ) 2 k + 1 x 2 m ( 2 m ) ! = x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! m = 0 ( 1 ) m 2 k + 2 m 2 k Q ( 2 k , 2 m ) ( 2 x ) 2 m ( 2 m ) ! , k 2 .

Making use of the series expansion (3.17) and identity (3.9) in Lemma 3.2, we obtain

k = 0 ( arcsin x ) 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! α 2 k + 1 = α k = 0 ( 1 ) k 2 2 k x 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! j = 0 2 k ( 1 ) j = 2 j 2 k s ( 2 k , ) 2 2 j ( 2 k 1 ) 2 j α 2 j = j = 0 ( 1 ) j k = j / 2 ( 1 ) k ( 2 x ) 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! = 2 j 2 k s ( 2 k , ) 2 + 1 2 j ( 2 k 1 ) 2 j α 2 j + 1 = k = 0 ( 1 ) k m = k / 2 ( 1 ) m ( 2 x ) 2 m + 1 ( 2 m + 1 ) ! = 2 k 2 m s ( 2 m , ) 2 + 1 2 k ( 2 m 1 ) 2 k α 2 k + 1 ,

where we used identity (3.10) or (3.15) and x stands for the ceiling function which gives the smallest integer not less than x . Regarding α as a variable and equating coefficients of α 2 k + 1 reduce to

(6.3) ( arcsin x ) 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! = ( 1 ) k m = k / 2 ( 1 ) m = 2 k 2 m s ( 2 m , ) 2 + 1 2 k ( 2 m 1 ) 2 k ( 2 x ) 2 m + 1 ( 2 m + 1 ) ! = x 2 k + 1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! m = 0 ( 1 ) m 2 k + 2 m + 1 2 k + 1 Q ( 2 k + 1 , 2 m ) ( 2 x ) 2 m ( 2 m ) ! .

Combining the series expansions (6.1), (6.2), and (6.3) leads to the series expansion (2.2).

By similar arguments as above, from the series expansions (3.21) and (3.22), we can recover series expansion (2.2) once again.

Utilizing the relation arcsinh t = i arcsin ( i t ) or, equivalently, the relation arcsin t = i arcsinh ( i t ) , the series expansions (2.2) and (2.4) can be derived from each other.

7 A simple application of the series expansion of arcsin x x k to Riemann zeta function

The special cases k = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 of Maclaurin’s series expansion (2.2) in Theorem 2.1 have been applied in [30,31, 32,33]. These applications have been reviewed and generalized in [1,27].

Now we quote a paragraph in [32, Section 5] as follows.

Wolfram alpha (https://www.wolframalpha.com) says that

(7.1) 0 1 ( arcsin x ) 3 x d x = 0 π / 2 u 3 cot u d u = π 3 8 ln 2 9 16 π ζ ( 3 )

and

(7.2) 0 1 ( arcsin x ) 4 x d x = 0 π / 2 u 4 cot u d u = 1 32 [ 2 π 4 ln 2 18 π 2 ζ ( 3 ) + 93 ζ ( 5 ) ] ,

where the Riemann zeta function ζ ( z ) can be defined [44, Fact 13.3] for z C with ( z ) > 1 by

(7.3) ζ ( z ) = k = 1 1 k z = 1 1 2 z k = 1 1 ( 2 k 1 ) z = 1 1 2 1 z k = 1 ( 1 ) k 1 1 k z .

It should be possible to describe such integrals as certain infinite sums with or without numbers

(7.4) w 2 n = ( 2 n 1 ) ! ! ( 2 n ) ! ! = 1 2 2 n 2 n n .

We plan to study those details in subsequent publication.

Substituting Maclaurin’s series expansion (2.2) for k = 3 , 4 into the left hand sides of (7.1) and (7.2) and simplifying produce

(7.5) 0 1 ( arcsin x ) 3 x d x = 1 3 + 3 m = 1 ( 1 ) m Q ( 3 , 2 m ) ( 3 + 2 m ) ! 2 2 m + 1 2 m + 3

and

(7.6) 0 1 ( arcsin x ) 4 x d x = 1 4 + 3 m = 1 ( 1 ) m Q ( 4 , 2 m ) ( 4 + 2 m ) ! 2 2 m + 3 2 m + 4 .

Combining (7.1) and (7.2) with (7.5) and (7.6) and simplifying yield

2 π 3 ln 2 9 π ζ ( 3 ) = 16 3 + 12 m = 1 ( 1 ) m Q ( 3 , 2 m ) ( 3 + 2 m ) ! 2 2 m + 3 2 m + 3

and

2 π 4 ln 2 18 π 2 ζ ( 3 ) + 93 ζ ( 5 ) = 8 + 48 m = 1 ( 1 ) m Q ( 4 , 2 m ) ( 4 + 2 m ) ! 2 2 m + 4 2 m + 4 ,

where Q ( 3 , 2 m ) and Q ( 4 , 2 m ) are defined by the quantity in (2.3).

Remark 7.1

On the Riemann zeta function ζ ( z ) defined in (7.3) and its recent applications, we recommend the articles [19,41,45,46, 47,48]. On the Wallis ratio defined in (7.4) and its properties, we recommend the articles [49, 50,51] and closely related references therein.

8 Conclusion

In this article, by virtue of Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2, with the aid of Taylor’s series expansion (3.23) or (3.18) in Lemma 3.3, and in the light of properties recited in Lemma 3.4 of partial Bell polynomials, the author establishes Taylor’s series expansions (4.1), (4.2), and (5.3) in Theorems 4.1 and 5.2, presents a closed-form formula (5.1), derives several combinatorial identities (3.2), (3.3), (3.11), (4.23), (5.2), and (5.4), demonstrates several series representations (4.9), (4.10), and (5.5) in Corollaries 4.2 and 5.2 of the circular constant π and its real powers, recovers Maclaurin’s series expansions (2.2) and (2.4) in Section 6, and finally applies the series expansion (2.2) in Theorem 2.1 to derive series representations for quantities containing π and its powers, ζ ( 3 ) , and ζ ( 5 ) .

Those conclusions stated in Corollaries 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, and 4.6 are useful, meaningful, and significant.

Several Maclaurin’s series expansions of the functions ( arccos x ) m and ( arccosh x ) m for m N have been surveyed, reviewed, collected, and mentioned in [27, Section 7], but comparatively their forms or formulations are not more beautiful, not more satisfactory, not simpler, not more concise, or not nicer than these newly established ones in this article.

This article is a revised version of the preprint [52] and a companion of the papers [1,27,39,43,53].


;

#Dedicated to my 80-year-old father, Shu-Gong Qi, and to my 18-month-old grandson, Magnus Xi-Zhe Qi.


Acknowledgment

The author is thankful to anonymous referees for their careful corrections to and helpful comments on the original version of this article.

  1. Funding information: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.

  4. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.

  5. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

[1] B.-N. Guo, D. Lim, and F. Qi, Series expansions of powers of arcsine, closed forms for special values of Bell polynomials, and series representations of generalized logsine functions, AIMS Math. 6 (2021), no. 7, 7494–7517, https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021438.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] E. R. Hansen, A Table of Series and Products, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1975.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] N. M. Temme, Special Functions: An Introduction to Classical Functions of Mathematical Physics, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1996, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118032572.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] C.-F. Wei, Integral representations and inequalities of extended central binomial coefficients, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 45 (2022), no. 9, 5412–5422, https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.8115.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] F. Qi, Diagonal recurrence relations for the Stirling numbers of the first kind, Contrib. Discrete Math. 11 (2016), no. 1, 22–30, https://doi.org/10.11575/cdm.v11i1.62389.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] F. Qi, Diagonal recurrence relations, inequalities, and monotonicity related to the Stirling numbers of the second kind, Math. Inequal. Appl. 19 (2016), no. 1, 313–323, https://doi.org/10.7153/mia-19-23.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] F. Qi and B.-N. Guo, A diagonal recurrence relation for the Stirling numbers of the first kind, Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 12 (2018), no. 1, 153–165, https://doi.org/10.2298/AADM170405004Q.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] C. A. Charalambides, Enumerative Combinatorics, CRC Press Series on Discrete Mathematics and its Applications. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2002.Suche in Google Scholar

[9] L. Comtet, Advanced Combinatorics: The Art of Finite and Infinite Expansions, Revised and Enlarged Edition, D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1974, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2196-8.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] F. W. J. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clark (eds.), NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010, http://dlmf.nist.gov/.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun (Eds), Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, National Bureau of Standards, Applied Mathematics Series 55, 10th printing, Washington, 1972.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] F. Qi, D.-W. Niu, D. Lim, and Y.-H. Yao, Special values of the Bell polynomials of the second kind for some sequences and functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 491 (2020), no. 2, Article 124382, 31 pages, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2020.124382.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] F. Qi, X.-T. Shi, and F.-F. Liu, Expansions of the exponential and the logarithm of power series and applications, Arab. J. Math. (Springer) 6 (2017), no. 2, 95–108, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40065-017-0166-4.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] J. Quaintance and H. W. Gould, Combinatorial Identities for Stirling Numbers, The unpublished notes of H. W. Gould. With a foreword by George E. Andrews, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, Singapore, 2016.10.1142/9821Suche in Google Scholar

[15] V. R. Thiruvenkatachar and T. S. Nanjundiah, Inequalities concerning Bessel functions and orthogonal polynomials, Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. Sect. A 33 (1951), 373–384.10.1007/BF03178130Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Z.-H. Yang and S.-Z. Zheng, Monotonicity and convexity of the ratios of the first kind modified Bessel functions and applications, Math. Inequal. Appl. 21 (2018), no. 1, 107–125, https://doi.org/10.7153/mia-2018-21-09.Suche in Google Scholar

[17] C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, and B. K. Meister, On powers of Bessel functions, J. Math. Phys. 44 (2003), no. 1, 309–314, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1526940.Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Á. Baricz, Powers of modified Bessel functions of the first kind, Appl. Math. Lett. 23 (2010), no. 6, 722–724, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2010.02.015.Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Y. Hong, B.-N. Guo, and F. Qi, Determinantal expressions and recursive relations for the Bessel zeta function and for a sequence originating from a series expansion of the power of modified Bessel function of the first kind, CMES Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 129 (2021), no. 1, 409–423, https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2021.016431.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] F. T. Howard, Integers related to the Bessel function J1(z), Fibonacci. Quart. 23 (1985), no. 3, 249–257.Suche in Google Scholar

[21] V. H. Moll and C. Vignat, On polynomials connected to powers of Bessel functions, Int. J. Number Theory 10 (2014), no. 5, 1245–1257, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793042114500249.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] M. Bakker and N. M. Temme, Sum rule for products of Bessel functions: comments on a paper by Newberger, J. Math. Phys. 25 (1984), no. 5, 1266–1267, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.526282.Suche in Google Scholar

[23] B. S. Newberger, Erratum: New sum rule for products of Bessel functions with application to plasma physics, J. Math. Phys. 24 (1983), no. 8, 2250–2250, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.525940.Suche in Google Scholar

[24] B. S. Newberger, New sum rule for products of Bessel functions with application to plasma physics, J. Math. Phys. 23 (1982), no. 7, 1278–1281, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.525510.Suche in Google Scholar

[25] J. M. Borwein and M. Chamberland, Integer powers of arcsin, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2007 (2007), Art. ID 19381, 10 pages, https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/19381.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Yu. A. Brychkov, Power expansions of powers of trigonometric functions and series containing Bernoulli and Euler polynomials, Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 20 (2009), no. 11–12, 797–804, https://doi.org/10.1080/10652460902867718.Suche in Google Scholar

[27] B.-N. Guo, D. Lim, and F. Qi, Maclaurin’s series expansions for positive integer powers of inverse (hyperbolic) sine and tangent functions, closed-form formula of specific partial Bell polynomials, and series representation of generalized logsine function, Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 17 (2023), no. 1, in Press. https://doi.org/10.2298/AADM210401017G.Suche in Google Scholar

[28] F. Qi, Derivatives of tangent function and tangent numbers, Appl. Math. Comput. 268 (2015), 844–858, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.06.123.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] F. Qi, C.-P. Chen, and D. Lim, Several identities containing central binomial coefficients and derived from series expansions of powers of the arcsine function, Results Nonlinear Anal. 4 (2021), no. 1, 57–64, https://doi.org/10.53006/rna.867047.Suche in Google Scholar

[30] A. I. Davydychev and M. Y Kalmykov, New results for the ε-expansion of certain one-, two- and three-loop Feynman diagrams, Nuclear Phys. B 605 (2001), no. 1–3, 266–318, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00095-5.Suche in Google Scholar

[31] M. Yu. Kalmykov and A. Sheplyakov, lsjk–a C++ library for arbitrary-precision numeric evaluation of the generalized log-sine functions, Computer Phys. Commun. 172 (2005), no. 1, 45–59, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2005.04.013.Suche in Google Scholar

[32] M. Kobayashi, Integral representations for local dilogarithm and trilogarithm functions, Open J. Math. Sci. 5 (2021), no. 1, 337–352, https://doi.org/10.30538/oms2021.0169.Suche in Google Scholar

[33] F. Oertel, Grothendieck’s inequality and completely correlation preserving functions–a summary of recent results and an indication of related research problems, arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.00746v2.Suche in Google Scholar

[34] I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, Translated from the Russian, Translation edited and with a preface by Daniel Zwillinger and Victor Moll, Eighth edition, Revised from the seventh edition, Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384933-5.00013-8.Suche in Google Scholar

[35] M. I. Qureshi, J. Majid, and A. H. Bhat, Hypergeometric forms of some composite functions containing arccosine(x) using Maclaurin’s expansion, South East Asian J. Math. Math. Sci. 16 (2020), no. 3, 83–95.Suche in Google Scholar

[36] F. Qi and B.-N. Guo, Explicit formulas for special values of the Bell polynomials of the second kind and for the Euler numbers and polynomials, Mediterr. J. Math. 14 (2017), no. 3, Art. 140, 14 pages, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-017-0939-1.Suche in Google Scholar

[37] F. Qi, D.-W. Niu, D. Lim, and B.-N. Guo, Closed formulas and identities for the Bell polynomials and falling factorials, Contrib. Discrete Math. 15 (2020), no. 1, 163–174, https://doi.org/10.11575/cdm.v15i1.68111.Suche in Google Scholar

[38] F. Qi, X.-T. Shi, F.-F. Liu, and D. V. Kruchinin, Several formulas for special values of the Bell polynomials of the second kind and applications, J. Appl. Anal. Comput. 7 (2017), no. 3, 857–871, https://doi.org/10.11948/2017054.Suche in Google Scholar

[39] F. Qi, Explicit formulas for partial Bell polynomials, Maclaurin’s series expansions of real powers of inverse (hyperbolic) cosine and sine, and series representations of powers of Pi, Research Square (2021), https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-959177/v3.Suche in Google Scholar

[40] D. H. Lehmer, Interesting series involving the central binomial coefficient, Amer. Math. Monthly 92 (1985), no. 7, 449–457, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2322496.Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Q.-M. Luo, B.-N. Guo, and F. Qi, On evaluation of Riemann zeta function ζ(s), Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 7 (2003), no. 2, 135–144.Suche in Google Scholar

[42] S. Jin, B.-N. Guo, and F. Qi, Partial Bell polynomials, falling and rising factorials, Stirling numbers, and combinatorial identities, CMES Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 132 (2022), no. 3, 781–799, https://dx.doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2022.019941.Suche in Google Scholar

[43] F. Qi and M. D. Ward, Closed-form Formulas and Properties of Coefficients in Maclaurin’s Series Expansion of Wilf’s Function Composited by Inverse Tangent, Square Root, and Exponential Functions, 2022, arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.08576v2.Suche in Google Scholar

[44] D. S. Bernstein, Scalar, Vector, and Matrix Mathematics: Theory, Facts, and Formulas, Revised and expanded edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2018.10.1515/9781400888252Suche in Google Scholar

[45] F. Qi, A double inequality for the ratio of two non-zero neighbouring Bernoulli numbers, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 351 (2019), 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2018.10.049.Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Y. Shuang, B.-N. Guo, and F. Qi, Logarithmic convexity and increasing property of the Bernoulli numbers and their ratios, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM 115 (2021), no. 3, Paper No. 135, 12 pages, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-021-01071-x.Suche in Google Scholar

[47] Z.-H. Yang and J.-F. Tian, Sharp bounds for the ratio of two zeta functions, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 364 (2020), 112359, 14 pages, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2019.112359.Suche in Google Scholar

[48] L. Zhu, New bounds for the ratio of two adjacent even-indexed Bernoulli numbers, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM 114 (2020), no. 2, Paper No. 83, 13 pages, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-020-00814-6.Suche in Google Scholar

[49] C.-P. Chen and F. Qi, The best bounds in Wallis’ inequality, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 133 (2005), no. 2, 397–401, http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-04-07499-4.Suche in Google Scholar

[50] S. Guo, J.-G. Xu, and F. Qi, Some exact constants for the approximation of the quantity in the Wallis’ formula, J. Inequal. Appl. 2013 (2013), Paper No. 67, 7 pages, https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-67.Suche in Google Scholar

[51] F. Qi and C. Mortici, Some best approximation formulas and inequalities for the Wallis ratio, Appl. Math. Comput. 253 (2015), 363–368, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.12.039.Suche in Google Scholar

[52] F. Qi, Taylor’s series expansions for real powers of functions containing squares of inverse (hyperbolic) cosine functions, explicit formulas for special partial Bell polynomials, and series representations for powers of circular constant, arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02749v2.Suche in Google Scholar

[53] F. Qi and P. Taylor, Several series expansions for real powers and several formulas for partial Bell polynomials of sinc and sinhc functions in terms of central factorial and Stirling numbers of second kind, arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.05612v4.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-04-16
Revised: 2022-08-03
Accepted: 2022-08-12
Published Online: 2022-10-17

© 2022 Feng Qi, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Regular Articles
  2. On some summation formulas
  3. A study of a meromorphic perturbation of the sine family
  4. Asymptotic behavior of even-order noncanonical neutral differential equations
  5. Unconditionally positive NSFD and classical finite difference schemes for biofilm formation on medical implant using Allen-Cahn equation
  6. Starlike and convexity properties of q-Bessel-Struve functions
  7. Mathematical modeling and optimal control of the impact of rumors on the banking crisis
  8. On linear chaos in function spaces
  9. Convergence of generalized sampling series in weighted spaces
  10. Persistence landscapes of affine fractals
  11. Inertial iterative method with self-adaptive step size for finite family of split monotone variational inclusion and fixed point problems in Banach spaces
  12. Various notions of module amenability on weighted semigroup algebras
  13. Regularity and normality in hereditary bi m-spaces
  14. On a first-order differential system with initial and nonlocal boundary conditions
  15. On solving pseudomonotone equilibrium problems via two new extragradient-type methods under convex constraints
  16. Local linear approach: Conditional density estimate for functional and censored data
  17. Some properties of graded generalized 2-absorbing submodules
  18. Eigenvalue inclusion sets for linear response eigenvalue problems
  19. Some integral inequalities for generalized left and right log convex interval-valued functions based upon the pseudo-order relation
  20. More properties of generalized open sets in generalized topological spaces
  21. An extragradient inertial algorithm for solving split fixed-point problems of demicontractive mappings, with equilibrium and variational inequality problems
  22. An accurate and efficient local one-dimensional method for the 3D acoustic wave equation
  23. On a weighted elliptic equation of N-Kirchhoff type with double exponential growth
  24. On split feasibility problem for finite families of equilibrium and fixed point problems in Banach spaces
  25. Entire and meromorphic solutions for systems of the differential difference equations
  26. Multiplication operators on the Banach algebra of bounded Φ-variation functions on compact subsets of ℂ
  27. Mannheim curves and their partner curves in Minkowski 3-space E13
  28. Characterizations of the group invertibility of a matrix revisited
  29. Iterates of q-Bernstein operators on triangular domain with all curved sides
  30. Data analysis-based time series forecast for managing household electricity consumption
  31. A robust study of the transmission dynamics of zoonotic infection through non-integer derivative
  32. A Dai-Liao-type projection method for monotone nonlinear equations and signal processing
  33. Review Article
  34. Remarks on some variants of minimal point theorem and Ekeland variational principle with applications
  35. Special Issue on Recent Methods in Approximation Theory - Part I
  36. Coupled fixed point theorems under new coupled implicit relation in Hilbert spaces
  37. Approximation of integrable functions by general linear matrix operators of their Fourier series
  38. Sharp sufficient condition for the convergence of greedy expansions with errors in coefficient computation
  39. Approximation of conic sections by weighted Lupaş post-quantum Bézier curves
  40. On the generalized growth and approximation of entire solutions of certain elliptic partial differential equation
  41. Existence results for ABC-fractional BVP via new fixed point results of F-Lipschitzian mappings
  42. Linear barycentric rational collocation method for solving biharmonic equation
  43. A note on the convergence of Phillips operators by the sequence of functions via q-calculus
  44. Taylor’s series expansions for real powers of two functions containing squares of inverse cosine function, closed-form formula for specific partial Bell polynomials, and series representations for real powers of Pi
  45. Special Issue on Recent Advances in Fractional Calculus and Nonlinear Fractional Evaluation Equations - Part I
  46. Positive solutions for fractional differential equation at resonance under integral boundary conditions
  47. Source term model for elasticity system with nonlinear dissipative term in a thin domain
  48. A numerical study of anomalous electro-diffusion cells in cable sense with a non-singular kernel
  49. On Opial-type inequality for a generalized fractional integral operator
  50. Special Issue on Advances in Integral Transforms and Analysis of Differential Equations with Applications
  51. Mathematical analysis of a MERS-Cov coronavirus model
  52. Rapid exponential stabilization of nonlinear continuous systems via event-triggered impulsive control
  53. Novel soliton solutions for the fractional three-wave resonant interaction equations
  54. The multistep Laplace optimized decomposition method for solving fractional-order coronavirus disease model (COVID-19) via the Caputo fractional approach
  55. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear Analysis
  56. Some recent results on singular p-Laplacian equations
  57. Infinitely many solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equations with sign-changing nonlinearity without the aid of 4-superlinear at infinity
  58. Special Issue on Recent Advances for Computational and Mathematical Methods in Scientific Problems
  59. Existence of solutions for a nonlinear problem at resonance
  60. Asymptotic stability of solutions for a diffusive epidemic model
  61. Special Issue on Computational and Numerical Methods for Special Functions - Part I
  62. Fully degenerate Bernoulli numbers and polynomials
  63. Wigner-Ville distribution and ambiguity function associated with the quaternion offset linear canonical transform
  64. Some identities related to degenerate Stirling numbers of the second kind
  65. Two identities and closed-form formulas for the Bernoulli numbers in terms of central factorial numbers of the second kind
  66. λ-q-Sheffer sequence and its applications
  67. Special Issue on Fixed Point Theory and Applications to Various Differential/Integral Equations - Part I
  68. General decay for a nonlinear pseudo-parabolic equation with viscoelastic term
  69. Generalized common fixed point theorem for generalized hybrid mappings in Hilbert spaces
  70. Computation of solution of integral equations via fixed point results
  71. Characterizations of quasi-metric and G-metric completeness involving w-distances and fixed points
  72. Notes on continuity result for conformable diffusion equation on the sphere: The linear case
Heruntergeladen am 30.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dema-2022-0157/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen