Home Notes on continuity result for conformable diffusion equation on the sphere: The linear case
Article Open Access

Notes on continuity result for conformable diffusion equation on the sphere: The linear case

  • Van Tien Nguyen EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 31, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this article, we are interested in the linear conformable diffusion equation on the sphere. Our main goal is to establish some results on the continuity problem with respect to fractional order. The main technique is based on several evaluations on the sphere using spherical basis functions. To overcome the difficulty, we also need to use some calculations to control the generalized integrals.

MSC 2010: 35R11; 35B65; 26A33

1 Introduction

Diffusion is a common phenomenon in nature. We can easily encounter the diffusion process in many fields, such as: physics, chemistry, technology, or even economic and finance. For example, diffusion processes are used to model the price movements of financial instruments. Besides, diffusion also occurs in liquids and gases when their particles collide randomly and spread out. In this article, we are interested in studying the diffusion equation on the unit sphere S n R n + 1 as follows:

(1.1) D t θ u Δ u = G ( x , t ) ( x , t ) in S n × ( 0 , T ) , u ( x , 0 ) = f ( x ) x in S n ,

where f is the initial datum, G is the source term function, and D t θ is called the conformable derivative of order θ . Here, Δ is the Laplace-Beltrami operator defined in Section 2.

Before mentioning some equations involving fractional conformable derivatives, we present a handful of results about classical diffusion equations on the sphere. Le Gia [1] studied the approximation of parabolic equations on unit spheres using spherical basis functions. Some types of elliptic equations on the sphere were also studied by [2,3]. The diffusion equation on the sphere is an inspiration to many interested mathematicians. These equations describe several patterns occurring in geophysics, oceanography, and geology, for example [4,5, 6,7,8, 9,10]. In [11], Wendland provided a novel discretization method for studying (system of) semilinear parabolic equations on Euclidean spheres. In [4], the authors also proved the existence of random attractors for the Navier-Stokes equations on the sphere. The biggest challenge for us when studying the problem on the spheres is that we have to understand well about spherical harmonics. From visual observation, the investigation of diffusion equations on the spheres is more complicated than in the Euclidean domain.

There are many types of definitions for fractional-order derivatives. Among them, the three most common are Riemann-Liouville, Caputo, and Grünwald-Letnikov. Besides, we can encounter many others, such as Atangana-Baleanu, Caputo-Fabrizio, Hilfer, etc. (see [12,13, 14,15,16, 17,18,19, 20,21,22, 23,24] and references therein). Fractional derivatives are usually used for modeling processes of mass transport, diffusion [25], optics, and other phenomena with memory effects such as [26]. With its own characteristics, fractional-order models have demonstrated have advantages when modeling heat equation [27] and Brownian motion [28] or stochastic processes [29].

When investigating fractional diffusion equations, the issues of interest often are the well-posedness of solution by degree of nonlinearity source function [30] and the regularity [31,32,33]. This article also considers those matters for equations equipped with the fractional conformable derivative. It should be emphasized that the research direction of partial differential equations (PDEs) using conformable derivatives is one of the sub-branches of PDEs with fractional derivatives. Here, below is the definition of conformable derivative.

Let A be a Banach space, and the function v : [ 0 , ) A . Let D t θ be the conformable derivative operator defined as:

(1.2) D t θ v ( t ) lim h 0 v ( t + h t 1 θ ) v ( t ) h , 0 < θ 1 ,

for any v A (see [34,35]). The conformable derivative can be viewed as one of the extensions of the classical derivative, which was first proposed by Khalil in [34]. With the definition (1.2), we immediately realize that D t θ becomes a classical derivative operator in case θ = 1 . There are thousands of works related to conformable differential equation. However, there are not too many studies for the diffusion equation with conformable derivative on infinite dimensional spaces. Let us refer the reader to the interesting study [35], which investigated the well-posedness of the conformable diffusion equation in both cases, that is, linear and nonlinear source terms. In that work, the authors also show that the conformable derivative model agrees better with the experimental data than the normal diffusion equation.

It is a very interesting issue to observe the solution of the problem (1.1) for both cases θ = 1 and 0 < θ < 1 . If θ = 1 , the mild solution of the problem (1.1) depends on only two variables x and t , while with 0 < θ < 1 , it depends on θ , x , t . The problem of continuity in terms of variables x and t has been carefully investigated in [35]. However, the continuity problem for the mild solution to problem (1.1) with respect to the fractional order 0 < θ < 1 is still open, that is, in this work, we will focus on the question

(1.3) Does  u θ  converge to  u θ  when  θ θ ?

In (1.3), where u θ and u θ are two solutions to problem (1.1). The motivation and meaning of this question are carefully presented in [36]. The same question for equations with the Caputo fractional derivative has been studied in [37]. In article [38], authors investigated the initial value problem for a system of nonlinear pseudo-parabolic equations with Caputo fractional derivative. Our article expands the problem to the case of a conformable fractional derivative on the sphere.

This article is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces some basic knowledge on spherical harmonics and some necessary spaces on the sphere. The main research results are presented in Section 3. Section 4 gives some conclusion and discusses about further improvements.

2 Preliminaries

In this section, we refer to some knowledge on spherical harmonics from the articles [1,2,3, 4,9].

Let Δ be the Laplace-Beltrami operator in R n . The Laplace-Beltrami operator can be understood as the restriction of the standard Laplace operator on sphere, which can be written as follows:

Δ u ( x ) = Δ u ( x ) + n x T u ( x ) x T H ( u ) x ,

where Δ is the Laplace operator, is the gradient operator, and H is the Hessian matrix. We also know that the Laplace-Beltrami operator is linear, self-adjoint, and negative definite in the spatial variable.

It is so familiar that the eigenvalues of Δ are given as follows:

λ l = l ( l + n 1 ) , l = 0 , 1 , 2 , ,

and the respective eigenfunctions are called the spherical harmonics Y l ( x ) of order l . This means, they are spherical polynomials and satisfied

Δ Y l ( x ) = λ l Y l ( x ) .

The space of all spherical harmonics of degree l on S n , denoted by V l , has an orthonormal basis { Y l k ( x ) : k = 1 , 2 , 3 , N ( n , l ) } , where

N ( n , 0 ) = 1 , N ( n , l ) = ( 2 l + n 1 ) Γ ( l + n 1 ) Γ ( l + 1 ) Γ ( n ) , l 1 .

For any f L 2 ( S n ) , we can express it in terms of spherical harmonics as follows:

f = l = 0 k = 1 N ( n , l ) f ^ l k Y l k , f ^ l k = S n f Y ¯ l k d S ,

where d S is the surface measure of the unit sphere. The Sobolev space X σ ( S n ) with real parameter σ consists of all distributions f such that

f X σ ( S n ) 2 = l = 0 k = 1 N ( n , l ) ( l 2 + n l l ) σ S n f Y ¯ l k d S 2 < .

Obviously, the norm induced from an inner product is

f , g X σ ( S n ) = l = 0 k = 1 N ( n , l ) λ l σ f ^ l k g ^ l k .

3 Continuity results with respect to fractional order

First, we express u ( x , t ) in terms of spherical harmonics as follows:

u = l = 0 k = 1 N ( n , l ) u ^ l k Y l k , u ^ l k = u , Y l k = S n u Y ¯ l k d S .

By simple calculations, we obtain the ordinary differential equation with conformable derivative as follows:

(3.1) D t θ u ^ l k + λ l u ^ l k = G ( x , t ) , Y l k u ^ l k ( 0 ) = f ( x ) , Y l k .

Thanks to the formula in [39], we obtain

u ^ l k ( t ) = f , Y l k exp λ l t θ θ + 0 t ν θ 1 exp λ l t θ ν θ θ G ( ν ) , Y l k d ν .

Definition 3.1

The function u is called a mild solution of problem (1.1) if it satisfies the following nonlinear equation:

(3.2) u θ ( t ) = M θ ( t ) f + 0 t ν θ 1 M ¯ θ ( t θ ν θ ) G ( ν ) d ν ,

where M θ ( t ) and M ¯ θ ( t ) are defined by

(3.3) M θ ( t ) f = l = 0 exp ( l 2 + n l l ) t θ θ k = 1 N ( n , l ) S n f Y ¯ l k d S Y l k , f L 2 ( S n ) ,

and

(3.4) M ¯ θ ( t ) f = l = 0 exp ( l 2 + n l l ) t θ k = 1 N ( n , l ) S n f Y ¯ l k d S Y l k , f L 2 ( S n ) .

The following theorem is shown about the continuity problem with respect to fractional order.

Theorem 3.2

Let 0 < a 0 θ θ b 0 < 1 .

Let f X s + μ 2 ( S n ) and G L ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) . Then, for any ε > 0 , we obtain

(3.5) u θ u θ L ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) ( ( θ θ ) + ( θ θ ) s + ( θ θ ) s ε ) f X s + μ 2 ( S n ) + G L ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) .

Let f X s + μ 2 ( S n ) and G L 2 ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) . Then, for any ε > 0 , we obtain

(3.6) u θ u θ L ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) ( θ θ + ( θ θ ) ε + ( θ θ ) s + ( θ θ ) s ε ) f X s + μ 2 ( S n ) + G L 2 ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) .

Proof

It is obvious to find that the following equality exists:

(3.7) M θ ( t ) f M θ ( t ) f = l = 0 k = 1 N ( n , l ) exp ( l 2 + n l l ) t θ θ exp ( l 2 + n l l ) t θ θ S n f Y ¯ l k d S Y l k .

By looking at the inequality

e m e n C ( s ) m n s , s > 0

we obtain

(3.8) exp ( l 2 + n l l ) t θ θ exp ( l 2 + n l l ) t θ θ C ( s ) ( l 2 + n l l ) s t θ θ t θ θ s .

Using the inequality ( a + b ) s C ( s ) ( a s + b s ) , we obtain that

(3.9) t θ θ t θ θ s t θ ( θ θ ) + θ ( t θ t θ ) θ θ s C ( s ) ( θ θ s t θ s ( θ θ ) s + ( θ ) s t θ t θ s ) C ( s ) ( a 0 2 s t θ s ( θ θ ) s + a 0 s t θ t θ s ) .

Let us recall the following lemma as in [37].

Lemma 3.3

Assume that 0 a 0 a b b 0 and 0 < z Z 0 . For any ε > 0 , there always exists C ¯ ε > 0 such that

(3.10) z a z b max ( Z 0 b 0 + 2 ε , 1 ) C ¯ ε ( b a ) ε z a ε .

Applying Lemma 3.3, we obtain that the following bound:

(3.11) t θ t θ s ( max ( T b 0 + 2 ε , 1 ) ) s C ¯ ε ( θ θ ) s ε t s ( θ ε ) .

Combining (3.9) and (3.11), we derive that for any ε > 0 .

(3.12) t θ θ t θ θ s C 1 [ t θ s ( θ θ ) s + t s ( θ ε ) ( θ θ ) s ε ] ,

where C 1 depends on a 0 , s , b 0 , ε , and T . From the fact that θ b 0 and let us choose 0 < ε < a 0 , we can easily verify that two terms t θ s and t s ( θ ε ) are bounded by a positive constant C 2 that depends on T , s , and b 0 . Combining (3.8) and (3.12), we derive that

(3.13) exp ( l 2 + n l l ) t θ θ exp ( l 2 + n l l ) t θ θ C 3 ( l 2 + n l l ) s [ ( θ θ ) s + ( θ θ ) s ε ] ,

where C 3 depends on a 0 , s , b 0 , ε , and T . This inequality, together with (3.7), yields that

(3.14) M θ ( t ) f M θ ( t ) f X μ ( S n ) 2 = l = 0 k = 1 N ( n , l ) ( l 2 + n l l ) μ exp ( l 2 + n l l ) t θ θ exp ( l 2 + n l l ) t θ θ 2 × S n f Y ¯ l k d S 2 C 3 2 l = 0 k = 1 N ( n , l ) ( l 2 + n l l ) μ + 2 s [ ( θ θ ) s + ( θ θ ) s ε ] 2 S n f Y ¯ l k d S 2 = C 3 2 [ ( θ θ ) s + ( θ θ ) s ε ] 2 f X s + μ 2 ( S n ) 2 .

This implies that for any s > 0 ,

(3.15) M θ ( t ) f M θ ( t ) f X μ ( S n ) C 3 [ ( θ θ ) s + ( θ θ ) s ε ] f X s + μ 2 ( S n ) .

From (3.4), we obtain the following equality:

(3.16) M ¯ θ ( t ν ) f M ¯ θ ( t ν ) f = l = 0 k = 1 N ( n , l ) exp ( l 2 + n l l ) t θ ν θ θ exp ( l 2 + n l l ) t θ ν θ θ S n f Y ¯ l k d S Y l k .

By using the inequality

e m e n C ( s ) m n s , s > 0 ,

and ( a + b ) s C ( s ) ( a s + b s ) , we obtain

(3.17) exp ( l 2 + n l l ) t θ ν θ θ exp ( l 2 + n l l ) t θ ν θ θ C ( s ) ( l 2 + n l l ) s t θ ν θ θ t θ ν θ θ s C ( s ) ( l 2 + n l l ) s t θ θ t θ θ s + ν θ θ ν θ θ s .

In view of (3.12), we have that

(3.18) t θ θ t θ θ s + ν θ θ ν θ θ s C 1 [ t θ s ( θ θ ) s + t s ( θ ε ) ( θ θ ) s ε ] + C 1 [ ν θ s ( θ θ ) s + ν s ( θ ε ) ( θ θ ) s ε ] C ¯ 1 [ ( θ θ ) s + ( θ θ ) s ε ] ,

where C 2 depends on s , ε , and T . With the same reasoning as before, we deduce that for any s > 0

(3.19)□ M ¯ θ ( t ν ) f M ¯ θ ( t ν ) f X μ ( S n ) C 4 [ ( θ θ ) s + ( θ θ ) s ε ] f X s + μ 2 ( S n ) .

Let us now continue to prove Theorem 3.2. From (3.2), we find that

(3.20) u θ ( t ) u θ ( t ) = ( M θ ( t ) f M θ ( t ) f ) + 0 t ν θ 1 [ M ¯ θ ( t θ ν θ ) M ¯ θ ( t θ ν θ ) ] G ( ν ) d ν + 0 t M ¯ θ ( t θ ν θ ) ( ν θ 1 ν θ 1 ) G ( ν ) d ν = B 1 ( t ) + B 2 ( t ) + B 3 ( t ) .

In view of (3.15), the norm of the first term B 1 is bounded by

(3.21) B 1 ( t , . ) X μ ( S n ) = M θ ( t ) f M θ ( t ) f X μ ( S n ) C 3 ( ( θ θ ) s + ( θ θ ) s ε ) f X s + μ 2 ( S n ) .

By applying (3.19), the term B 2 is bounded by

(3.22) B 2 ( t , . ) X μ ( S n ) = 0 t ν θ 1 [ M ¯ θ ( t θ ν θ ) M ¯ θ ( t θ ν θ ) ] G ( ν ) d ν X μ ( S n ) C 4 ( ( θ θ ) s + ( θ θ ) s ε ) 0 t ν θ 1 G ( ν ) X s + μ 2 ( S n ) d ν .

Let us divide two cases.

Case 1. The function G L ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) . Under this assumption, we have the following observation

(3.23) 0 t ν θ 1 G ( ν ) X s + μ 2 ( S n ) d ν G L ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) 0 t ν θ 1 d ν = t θ θ G L ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) .

Then, we follow from (3.22) that

(3.24) B 2 ( t , . ) X μ ( S n ) C 5 T θ θ G L ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) ( ( θ θ ) s + ( θ θ ) s ε ) .

Case 2. The function G L 2 ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) . Using the Hölder inequality and noting that θ > 1 2 , we derive that

(3.25) 0 t ν θ 1 G ( ν ) X s + μ 2 ( S n ) d ν 0 t ν 2 θ 2 d ν 1 2 0 t G ( ν ) X s + μ 2 ( S n ) 2 d ν 1 2 T 2 θ 1 2 θ 1 G L 2 ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) .

Then, we follows from (3.22) that

(3.26) B 2 ( t , . ) X μ ( S n ) C 6 T 2 θ 1 2 θ 1 G L 2 ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) ( ( θ θ ) s + ( θ θ ) s ε ) .

Since (3.4), we have the following observation:

(3.27) M ¯ θ ( t ) f X μ ( S n ) 2 = l = 0 k = 1 N ( n , l ) ( l 2 + n l l ) μ exp 2 ( l 2 + n l l ) t θ S n f Y ¯ l k d S 2 l = 0 k = 1 N ( n , l ) ( l 2 + n l l ) μ S n f Y ¯ l k d S 2 = f X μ ( S n ) 2 .

This implies that

(3.28) B 3 ( t , . ) X μ ( S n ) = 0 t M ¯ θ ( t θ ν θ ) ( ν θ 1 ν θ 1 ) G ( ν ) d ν X μ ( S n ) 0 t ν θ 1 ν θ 1 G ( ν ) X μ ( S n ) d ν .

Let us divide two cases.

Case 1. The function G L ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) . If t 1 , then it is easy to check that ν θ 1 ν θ 1 for 0 ν t and 0 < θ < θ < 1 . Hence, we derive that

(3.29) 0 t ν θ 1 ν θ 1 G ( ν ) X μ ( S n ) d ν 0 t [ ν θ 1 ν θ 1 ] d ν G L ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) .

The integral term on the right of (3.29) is evaluated as follows:

(3.30) 0 t [ ν θ 1 ν θ 1 ] d ν = t θ θ t θ θ = t θ ( θ θ ) + θ ( t θ t θ ) θ θ t θ θ θ a 0 b 0 + t θ t θ a 0 t θ θ θ a 0 b 0 + max ( T b 0 + 2 ε , 1 ) ( θ θ ) ε t ( θ ε ) a 0 C 5 ( t θ θ θ + ( θ θ ) ε t ( θ ε ) ) ,

where C 5 depends on a 0 , b 0 , and ε . If t 1 , then we have that

(3.31) 0 t ν θ 1 ν θ 1 G ( ν ) X μ ( S n ) d ν = 0 1 ν θ 1 ν θ 1 G ( ν ) X μ ( S n ) + 1 t ν θ 1 ν θ 1 G ( ν ) X μ ( S n ) d ν d ν G L ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) 0 1 ( ν θ 1 ν θ 1 ) d ν + G L ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) 1 t ( ν θ 1 ν θ 1 ) d ν .

It is obvious to see that

(3.32) 0 1 ( ν θ 1 ν θ 1 ) d ν = 1 θ 1 θ = θ θ θ θ θ θ a 0 b 0

and

(3.33) 1 t ( ν θ 1 ν θ 1 ) d ν = t θ 1 θ t θ 1 θ = t θ θ t θ θ + 1 θ 1 θ .

Let us now give the following estimate:

(3.34) t θ θ t θ θ = t θ ( θ θ ) + θ ( t θ t θ ) θ θ t θ θ θ a 0 b 0 + t θ t θ a 0 t θ θ θ a 0 b 0 + max ( T b 0 + 2 ε , 1 ) ( θ θ ) ε t ( θ ε ) a 0 C 5 ( t θ θ θ + ( θ θ ) ε t ( θ ε ) ) .

Combining (3.28), (3.29), and (3.30), we obtain that

(3.35) B 3 ( t , . ) X μ ( S n ) C 5 ( t θ θ θ + ( θ θ ) ε t ( θ ε ) ) G L ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) .

Combining (3.21), (3.24), and (3.35), we derive that

(3.36) u θ ( t ) u θ ( t ) X μ ( S n ) j = 1 3 B j ( t , . ) X μ ( S n ) ( ( θ θ ) s + ( θ θ ) s ε ) f X s + μ 2 ( S n ) + G L ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) ( ( θ θ ) s + ( θ θ ) s ε ) + ( t θ θ θ + ( θ θ ) ε t ( θ ε ) ) G L ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) .

From the inequality (3.36), it is clear that the evaluation (3.5) is true.

Case 2. The function G L 2 ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) . In view of the Hölder inequality, we derive that

(3.37) 0 t ν θ 1 ν θ 1 G ( ν ) X μ ( S n ) d ν 0 t [ ν θ 1 ν θ 1 ] 2 d ν G L 2 ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) .

Let us now provide the upper bound of the integral quantity on the right of (3.37). It is easy to compute the following evaluation:

(3.38) 0 t [ ν θ 1 ν θ 1 ] 2 d ν = 0 t ν 2 θ 2 d ν + 0 t ν 2 θ 2 d ν 2 0 t ν θ + θ 2 d ν = t 2 θ 1 2 θ 1 + t 2 θ 1 2 θ 1 2 t θ + θ 1 θ + θ 1 .

It is clear to see that

(3.39) 0 t [ ν θ 1 ν θ 1 ] 2 d ν M 1 ( t ) + M 2 ( t ) ,

where

M 1 ( t ) = t 2 θ 1 2 θ 1 t θ + θ 1 θ + θ 1 , M 2 ( t ) = t 2 θ 1 2 θ 1 t θ + θ 1 θ + θ 1 .

From the aforementioned two definitions, we have the following equality:

(3.40) M 1 ( t ) t 2 θ 1 ( θ θ ) ( 2 θ 1 ) ( θ + θ 1 ) + t 2 θ 1 t θ + θ 1 θ + θ 1 C ¯ ( a 0 , b 0 ) ( T 2 θ 1 θ θ + t 2 θ 1 t θ + θ 1 ) .

Using Lemma 3.3, we find that

(3.41) t 2 θ 1 t θ + θ 1 C ¯ ( ε , T , b 0 ) ( θ θ ) ε t 2 θ 1 ε ,

where 0 < ε < 2 a 0 1 . Therefore, we can derive that

(3.42) M 1 ( t ) C ¯ ( a 0 , b 0 , ε , T , θ ) ( θ θ + ( θ θ ) ε ) .

By similar reasoning, we obtain the following bound:

(3.43) M 2 ( t ) C ¯ ( a 0 , b 0 , ε , T , θ ) ( θ θ + ( θ θ ) ε ) .

Hence, we deduce that

(3.44) 0 t [ ν θ 1 ν θ 1 ] 2 d ν C ¯ ( a 0 , b 0 , ε , T , θ ) ( θ θ + ( θ θ ) ε ) .

It follows from (3.28) and (3.29) that

(3.45) B 3 ( t , . ) X μ ( S n ) C ¯ ( a 0 , b 0 , ε , T , θ ) ( θ θ + ( θ θ ) ε ) G L 2 ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) ,

where we remind that G L 2 ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) . Combining (3.21), (3.26), and (3.45), we infer that

(3.46) u θ ( t ) u θ ( t ) X μ ( S n ) j = 1 3 B j ( t , . ) X μ ( S n ) ( ( θ θ ) s + ( θ θ ) s ε ) f X s + μ 2 ( S n ) + G L 2 ( 0 , T ; X μ ( S n ) ) ( θ θ + ( θ θ ) ε + ( θ θ ) s + ( θ θ ) s ε ) .

The aforementioned inequality implies the desired result (3.6).

4 Conclusion

In this article, we considered the linear diffusion equation on the sphere with a conformable fractional derivative. We have achieved a new result on the continuity that related to a fractional-order derivative. By using spherical basis functions and some calculations to control the generalized integrals encountered, we showed the continuity of the solution with respect to the derivative order. In the next studies, we will focus on the nonlinear problem and investigate some of the various properties of the mild solutions.

  1. Funding information: The author states that there is no funding involved.

  2. Author contribution: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The author states that there is no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during this study.

References

[1] Q. T. Le Gia, Approximation of parabolic PDEs on spheres using spherical basis functions, Adv. Comput. Math. 22 (2005), no. 4, 377–397, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-003-3960-9. 10.1007/s10444-003-3960-9Search in Google Scholar

[2] Q. T. Le Gia, Galerkin approximation of elliptic PDEs on spheres, J. Approx. Theory 130 (2004), no. 2, 125–149, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jat.2004.07.008. 10.1016/j.jat.2004.07.008Search in Google Scholar

[3] Q. T. Le Gia, I. H. Sloan, and T. Tran, Overlapping additive Schwarz preconditioners for elliptic PDEs on the unit sphere, Math. Comp. 78 (2009), no. 265, 79–101, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-5718(08)02150-9. 10.1090/S0025-5718-08-02150-9Search in Google Scholar

[4] Z. Brzeźniak, B. Goldys, and Q. T. LeGia, Random attractors for the stochastic Navier-Stokes equations on the 2D unit sphere, J. Math. Fluid Mech. 20 (2018), no. 1, 227–253, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-017-0351-4. 10.1007/s00021-017-0351-4Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. Enelund, and P. Olsson, Damping described by fading memory-analysis and application to fractional derivative models, Int. J. Solids Struct. 36 (1999), no. 7, 939–970, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00339-9. 10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00339-9Search in Google Scholar

[6] L. D. Long, H. D. Binh, D. Kumar, N. H. Luc, and N. H. Can, Stability of fractional order of time nonlinear fractional diffusion equation with Riemann-Liouville derivative, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 45 (2022), 6194–6216, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.8166. 10.1002/mma.8166Search in Google Scholar

[7] H. Afshari, and E. Karapinar, A solution of the fractional differential equations in the setting of b-metric space, Carpathian Math. Publ. 13 (2021), no. 3, 764–774, DOI: https://doi.org/10.15330/cmp.13.3.764-774. 10.15330/cmp.13.3.764-774Search in Google Scholar

[8] E. Karapinar, A. Fulga, N. Shahzad, and A. F. Roldan Lopez de Hierro, Solving integral equations by means of fixed point theory, J. Funct. Spaces 2022 (2022), 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7667499. Search in Google Scholar

[9] N. D. Phuong and N. H. Luc, Note on a nonlocal pseudo-parabolic equation on the unit sphere, Dynamic Syst. Appl. 30 (2021), no. 2, 295–304, DOI: https://doi.org/10.46719/dsa20213029. 10.46719/dsa20213029Search in Google Scholar

[10] T. T. Binh, Semilinear parabolic diffusion systems on the sphere with Caputo-Fabrizio operator, Adv. Theory Nonlinear Anal. Appl. 6 (2022), no. 2, 148–156, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31197/atnaa.1012869. 10.31197/atnaa.1012869Search in Google Scholar

[11] H. Wendland, A high-order approximation method for semilinear parabolic equations on spheres, Math. Comp. 82 (2013), no. 281, 227–245, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-2012-02623-8. 10.1090/S0025-5718-2012-02623-8Search in Google Scholar

[12] R. S. Adiguzel, U. Aksoy, E. Karapinar, and I. M. Erhan, On the solution of a boundary value problem associated with a fractional differential equation, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. (2020), 1–12, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.6652. 10.1002/mma.6652Search in Google Scholar

[13] H. Afshari, and E. Karapinar, A discussion on the existence of positive solutions of the boundary value problems via psi-Hilfer fractional derivative on b-metric spaces, Adv. Difference Equations 1 (2020), no. 616, 1–11, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03076-z. 10.1186/s13662-020-03076-zSearch in Google Scholar

[14] H. Afshari, S. Kalantari, and E. Karapinar, Solution of fractional differential equations via coupled fixed point, Electron. J. Differ. Equ. Conf. 2015 (2015), no. 286, 1–12, DOI: http://ejde.math.unt.eduftpejde.math.txstate.edu. Search in Google Scholar

[15] B. Alqahtani, H. Aydi, E. Karapinar, and V. Rakocevic, A solution for Volterra fractional integral equations by hybrid contractions, Mathematics 7 (2019), no. 8, 694, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math7080694. 10.3390/math7080694Search in Google Scholar

[16] E. Karapinar, A. Fulga, M. Rashid, L. Shahid, and H. Aydi, Large contractions on quasi-metric spaces with an application to nonlinear fractional differential-equations, Mathematics 7 (2019), no. 5, 444, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math7050444. 10.3390/math7050444Search in Google Scholar

[17] A. Salim, B. Benchohra, E. Karapinar, and J. E. Lazreg, Existence and Ulam stability for impulsive generalized Hilfer-type fractional differential equations, Adv. Difference Equations 1 (2020), 1–21, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03063-4. 10.1186/s13662-020-03063-4Search in Google Scholar

[18] E. Karapınar, T. Abdeljawad, and F. Jarad, Applying new fixed point theorems on fractional and ordinary differential equations, Adv. Difference Equations 2019 (2019), no. 421, 1–25, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2354-3. 10.1186/s13662-019-2354-3Search in Google Scholar

[19] A. Abdeljawad, R. P. Agarwal, E. Karapinar, and P. S. Kumari, Solutions of the nonlinear integral equation and fractional differential equation using the technique of a fixed point with a numerical experiment in extended b-metric space, Symmetry 11 (2019), no. 5, 686, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11050686. 10.3390/sym11050686Search in Google Scholar

[20] N. D. Phuong, Note on a Allen-Cahn equation with Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Results Nonlinear Anal. 4 (2021), no. 3, 179–185, DOI: https://doi.org/10.53006/rna.962068. 10.53006/rna.962068Search in Google Scholar

[21] N. H. Tuan, N. H. Can, R. Wang, and Y. Zhou, Initial value problem for fractional Volterra integro-differential equations with Caputo derivative, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 26 (2021), no. 12, 6483–6510, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2021030. 10.3934/dcdsb.2021030Search in Google Scholar

[22] T. B. Ngoc, N. H. Tuan, T. Caraballo, and Y. Zhou, Existence and regularity results for terminal value problem for nonlinear fractional wave equations, Nonlinearity 34 (2021), no. 3, 1448–1502, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/abc4d9. 10.1088/1361-6544/abc4d9Search in Google Scholar

[23] R. S. Adiguzel, U. Aksoy, E. Karapinar, and I. M. Erhan, Uniqueness of solution for higher-order nonlinear fractional differential equations with multi-point and integral boundary conditions, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fiiiis. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM 115 (2021), no. 115, 1–16, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-021-01095-3. 10.1007/s13398-021-01095-3Search in Google Scholar

[24] R. S. Adiguzel, U. Aksoy, E. Karapinar, and I. M. Erhan, On the solutions of fractional differential equations via Geraghty type hybrid contractions, Appl. Comput. Math. 20 (2021), no. 2, 313–333. Search in Google Scholar

[25] N. H. Tuan, and T. Caraballo, On initial and terminal value problems for fractional nonclassical diffusion equations, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 149 (2021), 143–161, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/15131. 10.1090/proc/15131Search in Google Scholar

[26] N. A. Tuan, N. H. Tuan, and C. Yang, On Cauchy problem for fractional parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel model, Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 12 (2023), no. 1, 97–116, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2022-0256. 10.1515/anona-2022-0256Search in Google Scholar

[27] N. H. Tuan, V. V. Au, and N. A. Tuan, Mild solutions to a time-fractional Cauchy problem with nonlocal nonlinearity in Besov spaces, Arch. Math. 118 (2022), no. 3, 305–314, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00013-022-01702-8. 10.1007/s00013-022-01702-8Search in Google Scholar

[28] N. H. Tuan, M. Foondun, T. N. Thach, and R. Wang, On backward problems for stochastic fractional reaction equations with standard and fractional Brownian motion, Bull. Sci. Math. 179 (2022), no. 103158, 58 pp, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulsci.2022.103158. 10.1016/j.bulsci.2022.103158Search in Google Scholar

[29] J. Xu, Z. Zhang, and T. Caraballo, Mild solutions to time fractional stochastic 2D-stokes equations with bounded and unbounded delay, J. Dynam. Differential Equations 34 (2022), 583–603, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-019-09809-3. 10.1007/s10884-019-09809-3Search in Google Scholar

[30] N. H. Tuan, N. A. Tuan, and C. Yang, Global well-posedness for fractional Sobolev-Galpern type equations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 42 (2022), no. 6, 2637–2665, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2021206. 10.3934/dcds.2021206Search in Google Scholar

[31] N. A. Tuan, T. Caraballo, and N. H. Tuan, On the initial value problem for a class of nonlinear biharmonic equation with time-fractional derivative, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 152 (2022), 989–1031, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/prm.2021.44. 10.1017/prm.2021.44Search in Google Scholar

[32] T. B Ngoc, T. Caraballo, N. H. Tuan, and Y. Zhou, Existence and regularity results for terminal value problem for nonlinear fractional wave equations, Nonlinearity 34 (2021), 1448–1503, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/abc4d9. 10.1088/1361-6544/abc4d9Search in Google Scholar

[33] J. Xu, Z. Zhang, and T. Caraballo, Non-autonomous nonlocal partial differential equations with delay and memory, J. Differ. Equ. 270 (2021), 505–546, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2020.07.037. 10.1016/j.jde.2020.07.037Search in Google Scholar

[34] R. Khalil, M. AlHorani, A. Yousef, and M. Sababheh, A new definition of fractional derivative, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 264 (2014), 65–70, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2014.01.002. 10.1016/j.cam.2014.01.002Search in Google Scholar

[35] N. H. Tuan, T. B. Ngoc, D. Baleanu, and D. O’Regan, On well-posedness of the sub-diffusion equation with conformable derivative model, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 89 (2020), 105332, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105332. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105332Search in Google Scholar

[36] D. T. Dang, E. Nane, D. M. Nguyen, and N. H. Tuan, Continuity of solutions of a class of fractional equations, Potential Anal. 49 (2018), no. 3, 423–478, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11118-017-9663-5. 10.1007/s11118-017-9663-5Search in Google Scholar

[37] N. H. Tuan, D. O’Regan, and T. B. Ngoc, Continuity with respect to fractional order of the time fractional diffusion-wave equation, Evol. Equ. Control Theory 9 (2020), no. 3, 773–793, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/eect.2020033. 10.3934/eect.2020033Search in Google Scholar

[38] E. Karapinar, H. D. Binh, N. H. Luc, and N. H. Can, On continuity of the fractional derivative of the time-fractional semilinear pseudo-parabolic systems, Adv. Difference Equations 2021 (2021), no. 70, 1–24, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03232-z. 10.1186/s13662-021-03232-zSearch in Google Scholar

[39] A. Jaiswal and D. Bahuguna, Semilinear conformable fractional differential equations in Banach spaces, Differ. Equ. Dyn. Syst. 27 (2019), no. 17, 313–325, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12591-018-0426-6.10.1007/s12591-018-0426-6Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-06-16
Revised: 2022-10-22
Accepted: 2022-10-26
Published Online: 2022-12-31

© 2022 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. On some summation formulas
  3. A study of a meromorphic perturbation of the sine family
  4. Asymptotic behavior of even-order noncanonical neutral differential equations
  5. Unconditionally positive NSFD and classical finite difference schemes for biofilm formation on medical implant using Allen-Cahn equation
  6. Starlike and convexity properties of q-Bessel-Struve functions
  7. Mathematical modeling and optimal control of the impact of rumors on the banking crisis
  8. On linear chaos in function spaces
  9. Convergence of generalized sampling series in weighted spaces
  10. Persistence landscapes of affine fractals
  11. Inertial iterative method with self-adaptive step size for finite family of split monotone variational inclusion and fixed point problems in Banach spaces
  12. Various notions of module amenability on weighted semigroup algebras
  13. Regularity and normality in hereditary bi m-spaces
  14. On a first-order differential system with initial and nonlocal boundary conditions
  15. On solving pseudomonotone equilibrium problems via two new extragradient-type methods under convex constraints
  16. Local linear approach: Conditional density estimate for functional and censored data
  17. Some properties of graded generalized 2-absorbing submodules
  18. Eigenvalue inclusion sets for linear response eigenvalue problems
  19. Some integral inequalities for generalized left and right log convex interval-valued functions based upon the pseudo-order relation
  20. More properties of generalized open sets in generalized topological spaces
  21. An extragradient inertial algorithm for solving split fixed-point problems of demicontractive mappings, with equilibrium and variational inequality problems
  22. An accurate and efficient local one-dimensional method for the 3D acoustic wave equation
  23. On a weighted elliptic equation of N-Kirchhoff type with double exponential growth
  24. On split feasibility problem for finite families of equilibrium and fixed point problems in Banach spaces
  25. Entire and meromorphic solutions for systems of the differential difference equations
  26. Multiplication operators on the Banach algebra of bounded Φ-variation functions on compact subsets of ℂ
  27. Mannheim curves and their partner curves in Minkowski 3-space E13
  28. Characterizations of the group invertibility of a matrix revisited
  29. Iterates of q-Bernstein operators on triangular domain with all curved sides
  30. Data analysis-based time series forecast for managing household electricity consumption
  31. A robust study of the transmission dynamics of zoonotic infection through non-integer derivative
  32. A Dai-Liao-type projection method for monotone nonlinear equations and signal processing
  33. Review Article
  34. Remarks on some variants of minimal point theorem and Ekeland variational principle with applications
  35. Special Issue on Recent Methods in Approximation Theory - Part I
  36. Coupled fixed point theorems under new coupled implicit relation in Hilbert spaces
  37. Approximation of integrable functions by general linear matrix operators of their Fourier series
  38. Sharp sufficient condition for the convergence of greedy expansions with errors in coefficient computation
  39. Approximation of conic sections by weighted Lupaş post-quantum Bézier curves
  40. On the generalized growth and approximation of entire solutions of certain elliptic partial differential equation
  41. Existence results for ABC-fractional BVP via new fixed point results of F-Lipschitzian mappings
  42. Linear barycentric rational collocation method for solving biharmonic equation
  43. A note on the convergence of Phillips operators by the sequence of functions via q-calculus
  44. Taylor’s series expansions for real powers of two functions containing squares of inverse cosine function, closed-form formula for specific partial Bell polynomials, and series representations for real powers of Pi
  45. Special Issue on Recent Advances in Fractional Calculus and Nonlinear Fractional Evaluation Equations - Part I
  46. Positive solutions for fractional differential equation at resonance under integral boundary conditions
  47. Source term model for elasticity system with nonlinear dissipative term in a thin domain
  48. A numerical study of anomalous electro-diffusion cells in cable sense with a non-singular kernel
  49. On Opial-type inequality for a generalized fractional integral operator
  50. Special Issue on Advances in Integral Transforms and Analysis of Differential Equations with Applications
  51. Mathematical analysis of a MERS-Cov coronavirus model
  52. Rapid exponential stabilization of nonlinear continuous systems via event-triggered impulsive control
  53. Novel soliton solutions for the fractional three-wave resonant interaction equations
  54. The multistep Laplace optimized decomposition method for solving fractional-order coronavirus disease model (COVID-19) via the Caputo fractional approach
  55. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear Analysis
  56. Some recent results on singular p-Laplacian equations
  57. Infinitely many solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equations with sign-changing nonlinearity without the aid of 4-superlinear at infinity
  58. Special Issue on Recent Advances for Computational and Mathematical Methods in Scientific Problems
  59. Existence of solutions for a nonlinear problem at resonance
  60. Asymptotic stability of solutions for a diffusive epidemic model
  61. Special Issue on Computational and Numerical Methods for Special Functions - Part I
  62. Fully degenerate Bernoulli numbers and polynomials
  63. Wigner-Ville distribution and ambiguity function associated with the quaternion offset linear canonical transform
  64. Some identities related to degenerate Stirling numbers of the second kind
  65. Two identities and closed-form formulas for the Bernoulli numbers in terms of central factorial numbers of the second kind
  66. λ-q-Sheffer sequence and its applications
  67. Special Issue on Fixed Point Theory and Applications to Various Differential/Integral Equations - Part I
  68. General decay for a nonlinear pseudo-parabolic equation with viscoelastic term
  69. Generalized common fixed point theorem for generalized hybrid mappings in Hilbert spaces
  70. Computation of solution of integral equations via fixed point results
  71. Characterizations of quasi-metric and G-metric completeness involving w-distances and fixed points
  72. Notes on continuity result for conformable diffusion equation on the sphere: The linear case
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dema-2022-0178/html
Scroll to top button