Home λ-q-Sheffer sequence and its applications
Article Open Access

λ-q-Sheffer sequence and its applications

  • Taekyun Kim , Dae San Kim and Hye Kyung Kim EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 25, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Recently, Kim-Kim [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 493 (2021), no. 1] introduced the degenerate Sheffer sequence and λ-Sheffer sequence. The purpose of this article is to study λ-q-Sheffer sequence and the degenerate q-Sheffer sequence, which are derived from the view point of degenerate umbral calculus and investigate some properties related to those sequences. In addition, we give some new identities associated with q-special polynomials arising from our investigation.

MSC 2010: 05A30; 05A40; 11B68

1 Introduction

In the 1970s, Rota and Roman [1,2] began to construct a rigorous foundation for the classical umbral calculus, which was based on modern concepts like a linear functional, a linear operator, an adjoint, and so on. In the 1980s, Ihrig and Ismail [3] and Roman [4] considered the q-umbral calculus as an extended version of the classical umbral calculus. The q-Sheffer sequences occupy the central position in the theory and are characterized by the generating functions as in [1,4,5], where the q-exponential function enters. In addition, Carlitz [6,7] extended the classical Bernoulli numbers and polynomials, introducing them as q-Bernoulli and q-Euler numbers and polynomials. Since that time, several authors have studied these and other related subjects. For more details on q-umbral calculus and its applications, we let the reader refer to [3,4,6, 7,8,9, 10,11,12, 13,14,15, 16,17,18, 19,20,21, 22,23,24, 25,26,27]. Recently, many mathematicians have worked on degenerate versions of special polynomials and numbers, initiated by Carlitz [28], which include the degenerate Stirling numbers of the first and second kinds, the degenerate Bernstein polynomials, the degenerate Bell numbers and polynomials, the degenerate gamma function, the degenerate gamma random variables, and so on [19,28,29, 30,31,32, 33,34,35, 36,37,38]. Furthermore, Kim and Kim [30] introduced the degenerate Sheffer sequence and λ -Sheffer sequence. Since then, some scholars have been studying many interesting identities by using them.

In view of recent interesting results in degenerate umbral calculus, the focus of this article is to study λ -q-Sheffer sequence and the degenerate q-Sheffer sequence. The outline of this article is as follows. First, we recall several definitions and very basics about q-umbral calculus, including linear functionals, differential operators, and q-Sheffer sequences. In Section 2, we will define and briefly study the properties of degenerate q-exponential functions, degenerate q-Bernoulli polynomials of order r (higher-order degenerate q-Bernoulli polynomials), and degenerate q-Euler polynomials of order r (higher-order degenerate q-Euler polynomials) ( r N ) to apply to our results in section 3. In Section 3, we introduce a family of λ -q-linear functionals on the space of polynomials and a family of λ -q-differential operators adapted to the family of λ -q-linear functionals. We also prove several results on these functionals and those λ -q-differential operators. In addition, we introduce λ -q-Sheffer polynomials and provide some examples of such polynomials. We mention that the family { s n , q ( x λ ) } λ R of λ -q-Sheffer sequences s n , q ( x λ ) are called the degenerate sequences for the Sheffer polynomial s n , q ( x ) , where lim λ 0 s n , q ( x λ ) = s n , q ( x ) . We also explore the formula expressing one λ -q-Sheffer polynomial in terms of another λ -q-Sheffer polynomial. We study some identities arising from λ -q-Sheffer sequences. In Section 4, as applications of Section 3, we investigate some properties of degenerate q-Bernoulli polynomials of order r and degenerate q-Euler polynomials of order r , respectively, arising from λ -q-umbral calculus. We find several formulas for expressing any polynomials as a linear combination of degenerate q-Bernoulli polynomials and degenerate q-Euler polynomials with explicit coefficients, respectively. Also we establish some connections between degenerate q-Bernoulli polynomials (degenerate q-Euler polynomials) and higher-order degenerate q-Bernoulli polynomials (higher-order degenerate q-Euler polynomials).

Let q be a fixed real number between 0 and 1. The q-analogue of n ( N ) is given by

(1) [ n ] q = 1 q n 1 q ( see [3,6–13,16–19] ) .

The q-binomial coefficients is

(2) n k q = [ n ] q ! [ k ] q ! [ n k ] q ! ( see [3,11,12,14–19] ) ,

for n , k N { 0 } with k n , where [ n ] q ! = [ n ] q [ n 1 ] q [ 2 ] q [ 1 ] q and [ 0 ] q ! = 1 .

The q-binomial formulas are expressed as follows:

(3) i = 1 n ( a + b q i 1 ) = k = 0 n n k q q k ( k 1 ) 2 a n k b k , i = 1 n ( 1 b q i 1 ) 1 = k = 0 n + k 1 k q b k ( see [16] ) .

The q-exponential functions are given by

(4) e q ( t ) = 1 + n = 1 ( 1 q ) n t n ( 1 q ) ( 1 q 2 ) ( 1 q n ) = n = 0 t n [ n ] q ! , ( t C with t < 1 ) ( see [3,11–15] ) .

Note that e q ( t ) e t as q 1 .

The q-Bernoulli polynomials, which were studied by Kupershmidt [21], are given by the generating function

(5) t e q ( t ) 1 e q ( x t ) = n = 0 B n , q ( x ) t n [ n ] q ! ( see [14,21,23,25] ) .

When x = 0 , B n , q ( 0 ) = B n , q is called the n th q-Bernoulli number.

In [17], Kim considered the q-Euler polynomials given by the generating function:

(6) 2 e q ( t ) + 1 e q ( x t ) = n = 0 E n , q ( x ) t n [ n ] q ! ( see [15,17] ) .

For x = 0 , E n , q = E n , q ( 0 ) , ( n 0 ) , which are called the q-Euler numbers.

For any nonzero λ R , the degenerate exponential function is defined by

(7) e λ x ( t ) = ( 1 + λ t ) x λ , e λ ( t ) = ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ (see [29–34]) .

By Taylor expansion, we obtain

(8) e λ x ( t ) = n = 0 ( x ) n , λ t n n ! (see [29–34]) ,

where ( x ) 0 , λ = 1 , ( x ) n , λ = x ( x λ ) ( x 2 λ ) ( x ( n 1 ) λ ) , ( n 1 ) . Kim et al. introduced the λ -binomial coefficients given by

(9) x n λ = ( x ) n , λ n ! , ( n 1 ) and x 0 λ = 1 , ( λ R ) (see [19]) .

From (9), we obtain

(10) x + y n λ = k = 0 n x k λ y n k λ , ( n 0 ) (see [19]) .

For n 0 , it is well known that the Stirling numbers of the first and second kind, respectively, are given by

(11) ( x ) n = l = 0 n S 1 ( n , l ) x l and 1 k ! ( log ( 1 + t ) ) k = n = k S 1 ( n , k ) t n n ! (see [1,31,32,39]) ,

and

(12) x n = l = 0 n S 2 ( n , l ) ( x ) l and 1 k ! ( e t 1 ) k = n = k S 2 ( n , k ) t n n ! (see [1,31,32,38,39]) ,

where ( x ) n = x ( x 1 ) ( x n + 1 ) , ( n 1 ) and ( x ) 0 = 1 .

Moreover, the degenerate Stirling numbers of the first and second kind, respectively, are given by

(13) ( x ) n = l = 0 n S 1 , λ ( n , l ) ( x ) l , λ and 1 k ! ( log λ ( 1 + t ) ) k = n = k S 1 , λ ( n , k ) t n n ! (see [29–31,34]) ,

and

(14) ( x ) n , λ = l = 0 n S 2 , λ ( n , l ) ( x ) l and 1 k ! ( e λ ( t ) 1 ) k = n = k S 2 , λ ( n , k ) t n n ! (see [29–31,34,38]) .

Now, we review briefly the fundamental properties of q-umbral calculus [14]. Let C be the complex number field, and let F be the set of all formal power series in t over C with

(15) F = f ( t ) = k = 0 a k [ k ] q ! t k a k C .

Let P = C [ t ] and let P be the vector space of all linear functionals on P . We denote by L p ( x ) the action of the linear functional L on the polynomial p ( x ) .

The vector space operations on P are given as follows:

(16) L + M p ( x ) = L p ( x ) + M p ( x ) , c L p ( x ) = c L p ( x ) ,

where c is any constant in C (see [25]). For f ( t ) = k = 0 a k [ k ] q ! t k F , the linear functional on P is given by

(17) f ( t ) x n = a n , for all n 0 .

From (17), we obtain

(18) t k x n = [ n ] q ! δ n , k , ( n , k 0 ) ( see [4,14] ) ,

where δ n , k is the Kronecker’s symbol.

Let f L ( t ) = k = 0 L x k [ k ] q ! t k . Then, from (17) and (18), we have f L ( t ) x n = L x n and so L = f L ( t ) . Furthermore, the map L f L ( t ) is a vector space isomorphism from P onto F . Thus, F denotes both the algebra of formal power series in t and the vector space of all linear functionals on P , and so an element f ( t ) of F is thought of as both a formal power series and a linear functional. We call F the q-umbral algebra and the q-umbral calculus is the study of q-umbral algebra.

From (4) and (17), we easily see that

(19) e q ( y t ) x n = y n and e q ( y t ) p ( x ) = p ( y ) .

The order o ( f ( t ) ) of a power series f ( t ) is the smallest integer k for which the coefficient of t k does not vanish. If o ( f ( t ) ) = 1 , then f ( t ) is called a delta series (see [1,4,37]). Notice that for all f ( t ) in F

(20) f ( t ) = k = 0 f ( t ) x k [ k ] q ! t k ,

and for all polynomials p ( x ) ,

(21) p ( x ) = k 0 t k p ( x ) [ k ] q ! x k ( see [4,14] ) .

For f 1 ( t ) , f 2 ( t ) , , f n ( t ) F , we have

(22) f 1 ( t ) f m ( t ) x n = i 1 + + i m = n n i 1 , i 2 , , i m q f 1 ( t ) x i 1 f m ( t ) x i n ,

where n i 1 , , i m q = [ n ] q ! [ i 1 ] q ! [ i m ] q ! .

Let f ( t ) , g ( t ) F with o ( f ( t ) ) = 1 and o ( g ( t ) ) = 0 . Then there exists a unique sequence s n , q ( x ) ( deg s n , q ( x ) = n ) of polynomials such that

(23) g ( t ) f ( t ) k s n , q ( x ) = [ n ] q ! δ n , k , ( ( n , k ) 0 ) ( see [14,25] ) ,

which is denoted by s n , q ( x ) ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) .

The sequence s n , q ( x ) is called the q-Sheffer sequence for ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) . Let s n , q ( x ) ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) . Then for any h ( t ) in F and for any polynomial p ( x ) , we have

(24) h ( t ) = k = 0 h ( t ) s k , q ( x ) [ k ] q ! g ( t ) f ( t ) k

and

(25) p ( x ) = k = 0 g ( t ) f ( t ) k p ( x ) [ k ] q ! s k , q ( x ) ( see [4,14] ) .

Moreover, s n , q ( x ) is the q-Sheffer sequence for ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) if and only if

(26) 1 g ( f ¯ ( t ) ) e q ( x f ¯ ( t ) ) = n = 0 s n , q ( x ) t n [ n ] q ! ( see [4,14] ) ,

for all x C , where f ¯ ( f ( t ) ) = f ( f ¯ ( t ) ) = t .

2 Degenerate q-Bernoulli and degenerate q-Euler polynomials

In this section, we define the degenerate q-exponential functions, the degenerate q-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials of order r N , and the degenerate q-Euler numbers and polynomials of order r N .

In view of (9), we consider the degenerate q-binomial coefficients that are defined as follows:

(27) x n q , λ = ( x ) n , λ [ n ] q ! , ( n 1 ) and x 0 q , λ = 1 , ( λ R ) .

From (9) and (27), we observe

(28) x n λ = [ n ] q ! n ! x n q , λ .

From (10) and (28), we observe that

(29) x + y n q , λ = n ! [ n ] q ! x + y n λ = n ! [ n ] q ! k = 0 n x k λ y n k λ = n ! [ n ] q ! k = 0 n x k λ k ! [ k ] q ! [ k ] q ! k ! y n k λ ( n k ) ! [ n k ] q ! [ n k ] q ! ( n k ) ! = k = 0 n n k n k q x k λ , q y n k λ , q .

The Lah numbers are used to count the number of ways a set of n elements can be partitioned into k nonempty linearly ordered subsets and given by

(30) L ( n , k ) = n 1 k 1 n ! k ! ( see [32] ) .

Zou [27] considered the q-Lah numbers which are defined as

(31) L q ( n , k ) = n 1 k 1 q [ n ] q ! [ k ] q ! ( see [27] ) .

Let ( 1 t ) q k = l = 0 k 1 ( 1 q l t ) = ( 1 t ) ( 1 q t ) ( 1 q k 1 t ) . Then, from (3), we note that

(32) 1 ( 1 t ) q k = 1 ( 1 t ) ( 1 q t ) ( 1 q k 1 t ) = n = 0 n + k 1 n q t n .

From (31) and (32), we obtain the generating function of L q ( n , k ) as follows:

(33) 1 [ k ] q ! t k ( 1 t ) q k = t k [ k ] q ! n = 0 n + k 1 n q t n = 1 [ k ] q ! n = k n 1 n k q t n = 1 [ k ] q ! n = k n 1 k 1 q [ n ] q ! t n [ n ] q ! = n = k L q ( n , k ) t n [ n ] q ! .

In this article, we consider the degenerate q-exponential functions, which are given by

(34) e q , λ x ( t ) = n = 0 ( x ) n , λ [ n ] q ! t n ( t C with t < 1 ) .

When x = 1 , we have

(35) e q , λ ( t ) = e q , λ 1 ( t ) = n = 0 ( 1 ) n , λ [ n ] q ! t n .

When q = 1 , we note that

(36) e 1 , λ x ( t ) = e λ x ( t ) and lim λ 0 e q , λ x ( t ) = e q ( x t ) .

By (30), (31), and (34), we observe that

(37) e q , λ x ( t ) = n = 0 ( x ) n , λ [ n ] q ! t n = n = 0 x ( x λ ) ( x ( n 1 ) λ ) n ! n ! [ n ] q ! t n = n = 0 λ n x λ ( x λ 1 ) ( x λ ( n 1 ) ) n ! n ! [ n ] q ! t n = n = 0 λ n x λ n n ! [ n ] q ! [ k ] q ! [ k ] q ! k ! k ! n 1 k 1 q n 1 k 1 q n 1 k 1 n 1 k 1 t n = n = 0 λ n x λ n L ( n , k ) L q ( n , k ) k ! [ k ] q ! n 1 k 1 q n 1 k 1 t n .

By comparing the coefficients of both sides of (37), we have

(38) x n q , λ = k ! λ n [ k ] q ! x λ n L ( n , k ) n 1 k 1 q L q ( n , k ) n 1 k 1 = n ! [ n ] q ! λ n x λ n .

Now, we define the degenerate q-Bernoulli polynomials by

(39) t e q , λ ( t ) 1 e q , λ x ( t ) = n = 0 B n , q ( x λ ) t n [ n ] q ! .

When x = 0 , B n , q ( λ ) = B n , q ( 0 λ ) are called the degenerate q-Bernoulli numbers.

When q = 1 , we note that B n , 1 ( x λ ) = B n , λ ( x ) are the degenerate Bernoulli polynomials.

By (34) and (39), we obtain the following properties.

Proposition 1

For n 0 , we have

  1. B n , q ( x λ ) = l = 0 n n l q B n l , q ( λ ) ( x ) l , λ , ( n 0 ) .

  2. B 1 , q ( 1 λ ) B 1 , q ( λ ) = 1 , i f n = 1 , B n , q ( 1 λ ) B n , q ( λ ) = 0 , o t h e r w i s e .

The following are the first few values of B n , q ( λ ) :

B 0 , q ( λ ) = 1 , B 1 , q ( λ ) = λ 1 [ 2 ] q ! , B 2 , q ( λ ) = ( λ 1 ) [ 3 ] q [ 2 ] q ! ( 2 λ 1 ) , B 3 , q ( λ ) = ( λ 1 ) 2 [ 2 ] q ! ( [ 3 ] q ) 2 [ 2 ] q ! + ( 2 λ 1 ) + ( λ 1 ) ( 2 λ 1 ) [ 3 ] q [ 2 ] q ! + 1 [ 4 ] q ( 3 λ 1 ) , .

We also consider the degenerate q-Euler polynomials given by

(40) 2 e q , λ ( t ) + 1 e q , λ x ( t ) = n = 0 E n , q ( x λ ) t n [ n ] q ! .

When x = 0 , E n , q ( λ ) = E n , q ( 0 λ ) , ( n 0 ) are called the degenerate q-Euler numbers.

When q = 1 , we note that E n , 1 ( x λ ) = E n , λ ( x ) are the degenerate Euler polynomials.

From (34) and (40), we obtain the following proposition.

Proposition 2

For n 0 , we have

  1. E n , q ( x λ ) = l = 0 n n l q E n l , q ( λ ) ( x ) l , λ .

  2. E 0 , q ( 1 λ ) + E 0 , q ( λ ) = 2 , E n , q ( 1 λ ) + E n , q ( λ ) = 0 , i f n 1 .

The following are the first few values of E n , q ( λ ) :

E 0 , q ( λ ) = 1 , E 1 , q ( λ ) = 1 2 , E 2 , q ( λ ) = [ 2 ] q ! 2 2 + 1 2 ( λ 1 ) , E 3 , q ( λ ) = [ 3 ] q ! 2 3 + ( 1 [ 3 ] q 2 λ ) λ 1 2 , .

For r N , we naturally consider the degenerate q-Bernoulli polynomials of order r as follows:

(41) t e q , λ ( t ) 1 r e q , λ x ( t ) = n = 0 B n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) t n [ n ] q ! .

When x = 0 , B n , q ( r ) ( λ ) = B n , q ( r ) ( 0 λ ) are called the degenerate q-Bernoulli numbers of order r .

Then, we have

(42) B n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) = l = 0 n n l q B n l , q ( r ) ( λ ) ( x ) l , λ .

We also consider the degenerate q-Euler polynomials of order r given by

(43) 2 e q , λ ( t ) + 1 r e q , λ x ( t ) = n = 0 E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) t n [ n ] q ! .

When x = 0 , E n , q ( r ) ( λ ) = E n , q ( r ) ( 0 λ ) are called the degenerate q-Euler numbers of order r .

From (34) and (43), we obtain

(44) E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) = l = 0 n l q E n l , q ( r ) ( λ ) ( x ) l , λ .

3 λ -q-Sheffer sequences and degenerate q-Sheffer sequences

In this section, we introduce a family of λ -linear functionals on the space of polynomials and prove some basic theorems and propositions on these functionals.

Throughout this section, λ is arbitrary but is a fixed nonzero real number.

Let f ( t ) = k = 0 a k [ k ] q ! t k F . Then each λ R gives rise to the linear functional f ( t ) λ , q on P , called λ -q-linear functional given by f ( t ) , which is defined by

(45) f ( t ) ( x ) n , λ λ , q = a n , ( n 0 ) ( see [30] ) .

From (16) and (45), we note that

(46) t k ( x ) n , λ λ , q = [ n ] q ! δ n , k .

By (45), for f ( t ) F and p ( x ) in P , we have

(47) f ( t ) = k = 0 f ( t ) ( x ) k , λ λ , q [ k ] q ! t k

and

(48) p ( x ) = k = 0 t k p ( x ) λ , q [ k ] q ! ( x ) k , λ .

From (12) and (13), we note that

(49) x n = l = 0 n S 2 ( n , l ) ( x ) l = l = 0 n m = 0 l S 2 ( n , l ) S 1 , λ ( l , m ) ( x ) m , λ .

Thus, we have

(50) f ( t ) x n λ , q = l = 0 n m = 0 l S 2 ( n , l ) S 1 , λ ( l , m ) f ( t ) ( x ) m , λ λ , q .

In particular, we obtain

(51) t k x n λ , q = l = 0 n m = 0 l S 2 ( n , l ) S 1 , λ ( l , m ) t k ( x ) m , λ λ , q .

Theorem 3

For f ( t ) , g ( t ) F , we have

f ( t ) g ( t ) ( x ) n , λ λ , q = l = 0 n n l q f ( t ) ( x ) l , λ λ , q g ( t ) ( x ) n l , λ λ , q , f o r n 0 .

Proof

By (47), let f ( t ) = l = 0 f ( t ) ( x ) l , λ λ , q [ l ] q ! t l and g ( t ) = k = 0 g ( t ) ( x ) k , λ λ , q [ k ] q ! t k . Then we have

(52) f ( t ) g ( t ) = n = 0 l = 0 n n l q f ( t ) ( x ) l , λ λ , q g ( t ) ( x ) n l , λ λ , q t n [ n ] q ! .

From (48), we obtain

(53)□ f ( t ) g ( t ) ( x ) n , λ λ , q = l = 0 n n l q f ( t ) ( x ) l , λ λ , q g ( t ) ( x ) n l , λ λ , q , ( n 0 ) .

Proposition 4

  1. When o ( f ( t ) ) > deg p ( x ) , we have

    f ( t ) p ( x ) λ , q = 0 .

  2. When o ( f l ( t ) ) = l , for all l 0 , we have

    l = 0 a l f l ( t ) p ( x ) λ , q = l = 0 a l f l ( t ) p ( x ) λ , q , for all p ( x ) P .

Theorem 5

Let o ( f l ( t ) ) = l , for all l 0 and

f l ( t ) p ( x ) λ , q = f l ( t ) q ( x ) λ , q .

Then p ( x ) = q ( x ) .

Proof

For each n 0 , there exist constants α n , l such that

(54) t n = l = 0 α n , l f l ( t ) .

From (54), for all n , we obtain

(55) t n p ( x ) λ , q = l = 0 α n , l f l ( t ) p ( x ) λ , q = l = 0 α n , l f l ( t ) q ( x ) λ , q = t n q ( x ) λ , q .

From (55), we have the desired result.□

Theorem 6

For all k 0 , let deg p k ( x ) = k and

f ( t ) p k ( x ) λ , q = g ( t ) p k ( x ) λ , q .

Then f ( t ) = g ( t ) .

Proof

For each n 0 , there exist constants β n , k ( λ , q ) such that

(56) ( x ) n , λ = k = 0 n β n , k ( λ , q ) p k ( x ) .

From (56), for all n , we have

(57) f ( t ) ( x ) n , λ λ , q = k = 0 n β n , k ( λ , q ) f ( t ) p k ( x ) λ , q = k = 0 n β n , k ( λ , q ) g ( t ) p k ( x ) λ , q = g ( t ) ( x ) n , λ λ , q .

By (57), we have f ( t ) = g ( t ) .□

Remark 1

We note that f ( t ) is a delta series if and only if f ( t ) 1 λ , q = 0 and f ( t ) x λ , q 0 .

For each λ R and each nonnegative integer k , we define the λ -q-differential operator on P on

(58) ( t k ) λ , q ( x ) n , λ = ( [ n ] q ) k ( x ) n k , λ , if k n , 0 , if k > n ,

where ( [ n ] q ) k = [ n ] q [ n 1 ] q [ n ( k 1 ) ] q .

For any power series f ( t ) = k = 0 a k [ k ] q ! t k F , the λ -q-differential operator given by f ( t ) is

(59) ( f ( t ) ) λ , q ( x ) n , λ = k = 0 n n k q a k ( x ) n k , λ , ( n 0 ) ,

and by linear extension.

Theorem 7

Let f 1 ( t ) = j = 0 a j [ j ] q ! t j and f 2 ( t ) = l = 0 b l [ l ] q ! t l F . Then we have

( f 1 ( t ) f 2 ( t ) ) λ , q ( x ) n , λ = ( f 1 ( t ) ) λ , q ( ( f 2 ( t ) ) λ , q ( x ) n , λ ) .

That is, ( f 1 ( t ) f 2 ( t ) ) λ , q = ( f 1 ( t ) ) λ , q ( f 2 ( t ) ) λ , q .

Proof

From (59), we observe that

(60) ( f 1 ( t ) ) λ , q ( ( f 2 ( t ) ) λ , q ( x ) n , λ ) = ( f 1 ( t ) ) λ , q l = 0 n n l q b n l ( x ) l , λ = l = 0 n n l q b n l j = 0 l l j q a l j ( x ) j , λ = j = 0 n l = j n n l q l j q a l j b n l ( x ) j , λ = j = 0 n l = 0 n j n l + j q l + j j q a l b n l j ( x ) j , λ

= j = 0 n l = 0 n j n j q n j l q a l b n l j ( x ) j , λ .

On the other hand, by f 1 ( t ) f 2 ( t ) = n = 0 l = 0 n n l q a n l b l t n [ n ] q ! and (59), we obtain

(61) ( f 1 ( t ) f 2 ( t ) ) λ , q ( x ) n , λ = j = 0 n n j q l = 0 n j n j l q a n j l b l ( x ) j , λ = j = 0 n l = 0 n j n j q n j l q a l b n l j ( x ) j , λ .

By (60) and (61), we obtain the desired result.□

Remark 2

From (49), we note that

( f ( t ) ) λ , q x n = l = 0 n j = 0 l S 2 ( n , l ) S 1 , λ ( l , j ) ( f ( t ) ) λ , q ( x ) j , λ .

In particular, by (49) and (58), we have

( t k ) λ , q x n = l = 0 n j = 0 l S 2 ( n , l ) S 1 , λ ( l , j ) ( t k ) λ , q ( x ) j , λ = l = k n j = k l S 2 ( n , l ) S 1 , λ ( l , j ) ( [ j ] q ) k ( x ) j k , λ , if k n , 0 , if k > n ,

where ( [ j ] q ) k = [ j ] q [ j 1 ] q [ j ( k 1 ) ] q .

Theorem 8

For f ( t ) , g ( t ) F and p ( x ) P , we have

f ( t ) g ( t ) p ( x ) λ , q = g ( t ) ( f ( t ) ) λ , q p ( x ) λ , q = f ( t ) ( g ( t ) ) λ , q p ( x ) λ , q .

Proof

It is enough to show this for p ( x ) = ( x ) n , λ , ( n 0 ) .

By (47), put

(62) f ( t ) = l = 0 f ( t ) ( x ) l , λ λ , q [ l ] q ! t l and g ( t ) = l = 0 g ( t ) ( x ) l , λ λ , q [ l ] q ! t l .

Then, from (62) and Theorem 3, for all n , we have

(63)□ g ( t ) ( f ( t ) ) λ , q ( x ) n , λ λ , q = g ( t ) l = 0 n n l q f ( t ) ( x ) l , λ λ , q ( x ) n l , λ λ , q = l = 0 n n l q f ( t ) ( x ) l , λ λ , q g ( t ) ( x ) n l , λ λ , q = f ( t ) g ( t ) ( x ) n , λ λ , q .

Theorem 9

For f ( t ) , g ( t ) F with o ( f ( t ) ) = 1 and o ( g ( t ) ) = 0 , there exists a unique sequence s n , q ( x λ ) ( deg s n , q ( x λ ) = n ) of polynomials satisfying the orthogonality conditions

g ( t ) f ( t ) k s n , q ( x λ ) λ , q = [ n ] q ! δ n , k , ( n , k 0 ) .

Then sequence s n , q ( x λ ) is called the λ -q-Sheffer sequence for ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) , which is denoted by s n , q ( x λ ) ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) λ , q

Proof

The uniqueness is from Theorem 5.

For the existence, we may assume k n . Let s n , q ( x λ ) = j = 0 n α n , j ( λ , q ) ( x ) j , λ and g ( t ) f ( t ) k = l = k β k , l t l , with β k , k 0 . Then, we have

(64) [ n ] q ! δ n , k = l = k β k , l t l j = 0 n α n , j ( λ , q ) ( x ) j , λ λ , q = l = k β k , l j = 0 n α n , j ( λ , q ) t l ( x ) j , λ λ , q = l = k n β k , l α n , l ( λ , q ) [ l ] q ! .

From (64), we can determine α n , j ( λ , q ) for j = n , n 1 , , 0 , by taking k = n , n 1 , , 0 .□

Theorem 10

Let s n , q ( x λ ) ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) λ , q . Then for any h ( t ) F , we have

h ( t ) = l = 0 h ( t ) s l , q ( x λ ) λ , q [ l ] q ! g ( t ) f ( t ) l .

Proof

By Theorem 9, for all x , we observe that

(65) l = 0 h ( t ) s l , q ( x λ ) λ , q [ l ] q ! g ( t ) f ( t ) l s n , q ( x λ ) λ , q = l = 0 h ( t ) s l , q ( x λ ) λ , q [ l ] q ! g ( t ) f ( t ) l s n , q ( x λ ) λ , q = h ( t ) s n , q ( x λ ) λ , q .

From (65) and Theorem 6, we have the desired result.□

Theorem 11

Let s n , q ( x λ ) ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) λ , q . Then for any p ( x ) P , we have

p ( x ) = l = 0 g ( t ) f ( t ) l p ( x ) λ , q [ l ] q ! s l , q ( x λ ) .

Proof

For all x , we observe that

(66) g ( t ) f ( t ) l j = 0 g ( t ) f ( t ) j p ( x ) λ , q [ j ] q ! s j , q ( x λ ) λ , q = j = 0 g ( t ) f ( t ) j p ( x ) λ , q [ j ] q ! g ( t ) f ( t ) l s j , q ( x λ ) λ , q = g ( t ) f ( t ) l p ( x ) λ , q .

From Theorem 5, we obtain the desired result.□

Since e q , λ y ( t ) = k = 0 ( y ) k , λ [ k ] q ! t k , we have

(67) e q , λ y ( t ) ( x ) n , λ λ , q = k = 0 n ( y ) k , λ [ k ] q ! t k ( x ) n , λ λ , q = ( y ) n , λ ( n 0 ) .

We have e q , λ y ( t ) p ( x ) λ , q = p ( y ) , for any p ( x ) P .

Theorem 12

The sequence s n , q ( x λ ) is the λ -q-Sheffer for ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) if and only if

1 g ( f ¯ ( t ) ) e q , λ y ( f ¯ ( t ) ) = k = 0 s k , q ( y λ ) t k [ k ] q ! , for all y C ,

where f ¯ ( t ) is the compositional inverse of f ( t ) .

Proof

Let s n , q ( x λ ) ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) λ , q . Then by Theorem 10 and (67), we have

(68) e q , λ y ( t ) = k = 0 e q , λ y ( t ) s k , q ( x λ ) λ , q [ k ] q ! g ( t ) f ( t ) k = k = 0 s k , q ( y λ ) [ k ] q ! g ( t ) f ( t ) k .

From (68), we have

(69) 1 g ( t ) e q , λ y ( t ) = k = 0 s k , q ( y λ ) [ k ] q ! f ( t ) k .

By replacing t by f ¯ ( t ) in (69), we have

(70) 1 g ( f ¯ ( t ) ) e q , λ y ( f ¯ ( t ) ) = k = 0 s k , q ( y λ ) [ k ] q ! t k .

Conversely, suppose that (70) holds.

If r n , q ( x λ ) ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) λ , q , then, for all y C , we obtain

(71) k = 0 r k , q ( y λ ) [ k ] q ! t k = 1 g ( f ¯ ( t ) ) e q , λ y ( f ¯ ( t ) ) = k = 0 s k , q ( y λ ) [ k ] q ! t k .

Thus, for all x C , r k , q ( x λ ) = s k , q ( x λ ) .□

Example 1

  1. ( x ) n , λ ( 1 , t ) λ , q , since e q , λ x ( t ) = k = 0 ( x ) k , λ [ k ] q ! t k .

  2. B n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) e q , λ ( t ) 1 t r , t λ , q , from ( 41 ) .

  3. E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) e q , λ ( t ) + 1 2 r , t λ , q , from ( 43 ) .

Assume that, for each λ R of the set of nonzero real numbers, s n , q ( x λ ) is λ -q-Sheffer for ( g λ ( t ) , f λ ( t ) ) . Assume also that lim λ 0 f λ ( t ) = f ( t ) , lim λ 0 g λ ( t ) = g ( t ) , for some delta series f ( t ) and an invertible series g ( t ) . Then we see that lim λ 0 f ¯ λ ( t ) = f ¯ ( t ) . Moreover, by Theorem 13, for each λ R , we have:

(72) 1 g λ ( f ¯ λ ( t ) ) e q , λ x ( f ¯ λ ( t ) ) = k = 0 s k , q ( x λ ) ( x ) t k [ k ] q ! .

If lim λ 0 s k , q ( x λ ) = s k , q ( x ) , then, by (72), we have

1 g ( f ¯ ( t ) ) e q ( x f ¯ ( t ) ) = k = 0 s k , q ( x ) t k [ k ] q ! .

Hence, s n , q ( x ) is q-Sheffer for ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) , and

g ( t ) f ( t ) k s n , q ( x ) λ , q = [ n ] q ! δ n , k , ( n , k 0 ) .

In this case, we may say that the family { s n , q ( x λ ) } λ R of λ -q-Sheffer sequence s n , q ( x λ ) are the degenerate sequences for the q-Sheffer polynomial s n , q ( x ) . For example, { B n , q ( x λ ) } λ R are the degenerate sequences for the q-Bernoulli polynomials B n , q ( x ) , where B n , q ( x ) = lim λ 0 B n , q ( x λ ) . As another example, { E n , q ( x λ ) } λ R are the degenerate sequences for the q-Euler polynomials E n , q ( x ) , where E n , q ( x ) = lim λ 0 E n , q ( x λ ) .

Theorem 13

Let s n , q ( x λ ) ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) λ , q . Then we have

( f ( t ) ) q , λ s n , q ( x λ ) = [ n ] q s n 1 , q ( x λ ) , ( n 0 ) .

Proof

Let s n , q ( x λ ) ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) λ , q . Then, for all k 0 , we have

(73) g ( t ) f ( t ) k ( f ( t ) ) λ , q s n , q ( x λ ) λ , q = g ( t ) f ( t ) k + 1 s n , q ( x λ ) λ , q = [ n ] q ! δ n , k + 1 = [ n ] q [ n 1 ] q ! δ n 1 , k = g ( t ) f ( t ) k [ n ] q s n 1 , q ( x λ ) λ , q .

From Theorem 5, we obtain the desired result.□

Remark 3

For r , n N , combining (b) and (c) in Examples 1 with Theorem 13, respectively, we have

(74) ( t ) q , λ B n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) = [ n ] q B n 1 , q ( r ) ( x λ )

and

(75) ( t ) q , λ E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) = [ n ] q E n 1 , q ( r ) ( x λ ) .

Theorem 14

Let s n , q ( x λ ) ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) λ , q and P n , q ( x λ ) ( 1 , f ( t ) ) λ , q . For h ( t ) F , we have

( h ( t ) ) λ , q s n , q ( x λ ) = k = 0 n n k q h ( t ) s n , q ( x λ ) λ , q P n k , q ( x λ ) .

Proof

From Theorem 10, we obtain

(76) h ( t ) = k = 0 h ( t ) s k , q ( x λ ) λ , q [ k ] q ! g ( t ) f ( t ) k .

By Theorems 7 and 13 and (76), we observe that

(77) ( h ( t ) ) λ , q s n , q ( x λ ) = k = 0 n h ( t ) s k , q ( x λ ) λ , q [ k ] q ! ( g ( t ) f ( t ) k ) λ , q s n , q ( x λ ) = k = 0 n h ( t ) s k , q ( x λ ) λ , q [ k ] q ! ( g ( t ) ) λ , q ( ( f ( t ) ) λ , q k s n , q ( x λ ) ) = k = 0 n h ( t ) s k , q ( x λ ) λ , q [ k ] q ! ( g ( t ) ) λ , q ( [ n ] q [ n 1 ] q [ n ( k 1 ) ] q s n k , q ( x λ ) ) = k = 0 n n k q h ( t ) s k , q ( x λ ) λ , q ( g ( t ) ) λ , q s n k , λ ( x ) .

Here, we note that ( g ( t ) ) λ , q s n , q ( x λ ) = p n , q ( x λ ) . Indeed,

(78) [ n ] q ! δ n , k = g ( t ) f ( t ) k s n , q ( x λ ) λ , q = f ( t ) k ( g ( t ) ) λ , q s n , q ( x λ ) λ , q = f ( t ) k P n , q ( x λ ) λ , q .

From (77) and (78), we obtain the desired identity.□

Theorem 15

Let s n , q ( x λ ) ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) λ , q and r n , q ( x λ ) ( h ( t ) , l ( t ) ) λ , q . Then we have

s n , q ( x λ ) = k = 0 n A n , k r k , q ( x λ ) , w h e r e A n , k = 1 [ k ] q ! h ( f ¯ ( t ) ) g ( f ¯ ( t ) ) ( l ( f ¯ ( t ) ) ) k ( x ) n , λ λ , q .

Proof

From Theorem 9, we observe that

(79) h ( t ) l ( t ) k s n , q ( x λ ) λ , q = j = 0 n A n , j h ( t ) l ( t ) k r j , q ( x λ ) λ , q = [ k ] q ! A n , k .

Thus, we have

(80) A n , k = 1 [ k ] q ! h ( t ) l ( t ) k s n , q ( x λ ) λ , q .

For any ω ( t ) F , we assume that

(81) ω ( t ) s n , q ( x λ ) λ , q = 1 g ( f ¯ ( t ) ) ω ( f ¯ ( t ) ) ( x ) n , λ λ , q .

Then, from (80) and (81), we obtain immediately the desired result.

To prove (81), let ρ be a linear operator on P . Then its ( λ , q ) -adjoint is the linear operator ρ λ , q on P defined by the following condition:

ρ λ , q ω ( t ) p ( x ) λ , q = ω ( t ) ρ p ( x ) λ , q ,

for any ω ( t ) P , p ( x ) P .

One shows that ρ λ , q is continuous. Namely, o ( ρ λ , q f k ( t ) ) , as o ( f k ( t ) ) .

If p n , q ( x λ ) ( 1 , f ( t ) ) λ , q , then we say that p n , q ( x λ ) is λ -q-associated to f ( t ) . Assume that p n , q ( x λ ) ( 1 , f ( t ) ) λ , q . Let ρ f , λ , q be the linear operator on P , called the λ -q-umbral operator, given by ( x ) n , λ p n , q ( x λ ) . Let its adjoint be denoted by ρ f , λ , q . Then ρ f , λ , q f ( t ) k = t k , since

(82) ρ f , λ , q f ( t ) k ( x ) n , λ λ , q = f ( t ) k ρ f , λ , q ( x ) n , λ λ , q = f ( t ) k p n , q ( x λ ) λ , q = [ n ] q ! δ n , k = t k ( x ) n , λ λ , q .

By continuity of ρ f , λ , q , for any ω ( t ) , ρ f , λ ω ( f ( t ) ) = ω ( t ) . By taking ω ( t ) = f ¯ ( t ) k , we obtain ρ f , λ , q t k = f ¯ ( t ) k and ρ f , λ , q ω ( t ) = ω ( f ¯ ( t ) ) .

Assume that s n , q ( x λ ) ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) λ , q . Let ρ g , f , λ , q be the linear operator on P , called the λ -q-Sheffer operator, given by ( x ) n , λ s n , q ( x λ ) . Let ρ g , f , λ , q be its adjoint. Since

(83) [ n ] q ! δ n , k = g ( t ) f ( t ) k s n , q ( x λ ) λ , q = f ( t ) k ( g ( t ) ) λ , q s n , q ( x λ ) λ , q ,

from (82), (83), and Theorem 5,

(84) p n , q ( x λ ) = ( g ( t ) ) λ , q s n , q ( x λ )

is λ -q-associated with f ( t ) .

From (84), we have

(85) ρ g , f , λ , q ( x ) n , λ = s n , q ( x λ ) = ( g ( t ) 1 ) λ , q p n , q ( x λ ) = ( g ( t ) 1 ) λ , q ρ f , λ , q ( x ) n , λ

and ρ g , f , λ , q = ( g ( t ) 1 ) λ , q ρ f , λ , q . Now, we consider the multiplication by ω ( t ) 1 operator m ω ( t ) 1 on P . Then, we observe that m ω ( t ) χ ( t ) p ( x ) λ , q = ω ( t ) χ ( t ) p ( x ) λ , q = χ ( t ) ( ω ( t ) ) λ , q p ( x ) λ , q . Thus, m ω ( t ) is the ( λ , q ) -adjoint of ( ω ( t ) ) λ , q . This implies that ρ g , f , λ , q = ρ f , λ , q m g ( t ) 1 .

For any ω ( t ) , ρ g , f , λ , q ω ( t ) = ρ f , λ , q m g ( t ) 1 ω ( t ) = ρ f , λ , q g ( t ) 1 ω ( t ) = g ( f ¯ ( t ) ) 1 ω ( f ¯ ( t ) ) .

Thus, the right-hand side of (81) is

g ( f ¯ ( t ) ) 1 ω ( f ¯ ( t ) ) ( x ) n , λ λ , q = ρ g , f , λ , q ω ( t ) ( x ) n , λ λ , q = ω ( t ) ρ g , f , λ , q ( x ) n , λ λ , q = ω ( t ) s n , q ( x λ ) λ , q .

Example 2

For r , n N , we consider two λ -q-Sheffer sequences as follows:

(86) E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) e q , λ ( t ) + 1 2 r , t λ , q and B n , q ( x λ ) e q , λ ( t ) 1 t , t λ , q .

From (86) and Theorem 15, we have

(87) E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) = k = 0 n A n , k B k , q ( x λ ) ,

where

(88) A n , k = 2 e q , λ ( t ) + 1 r e q , λ ( t ) 1 t t k ( x ) n , λ λ , q = 2 e q , λ ( t ) + 1 r e q , λ ( t ) 1 t t k 1 [ n + 1 ] q ( t ) λ , q ( x ) n + 1 , λ λ , q = 1 [ n + 1 ] q 2 e q , λ ( t ) + 1 r ( e q , λ ( t ) 1 ) t k ( x ) n + 1 , λ λ , q = ( [ n ] q ) k [ n + 1 ] q 2 e q , λ ( t ) + 1 r j = 1 ( 1 ) j , λ [ j ] q ! t j ( x ) n k + 1 , λ λ , q = [ k ] q ! [ n + 1 ] q n k q j = 1 n k + 1 ( 1 ) j , λ n k + 1 j q 2 e q , λ ( t ) + 1 r ( x ) n k j + 1 , λ λ , q = [ k ] q ! [ n + 1 ] q j = 1 n k + 1 n k q n k + 1 j q ( 1 ) j , λ E n k j + 1 , q ( r ) ( λ ) .

Combining (87) with (88), we have

E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) = k = 0 n ( [ n ] q ) k 1 l = 1 n k + 1 n k + 1 l q ( 1 ) l , λ E n k j + 1 , q ( r ) ( λ ) B k , q ( x λ ) .

Example 3

For r , n N , we consider two λ -q-Sheffer sequences as follows:

(89) B n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) e q , λ ( t ) 1 t r , t λ , q and E n , q ( x λ ) e q , λ ( t ) + 1 2 , t λ , q .

From (89) and Theorem 15, we have

(90) B n , q ( x λ ) = k = 0 n A n , k E k , q ( x λ ) ,

where

(91) A n , k = t e q , λ ( t ) 1 r e q , λ ( t ) + 1 2 t k ( x ) n , λ λ , q = 1 2 ( [ n ] q ) k t e q , λ ( t ) 1 r ( x ) n k , λ λ , q + t e q , λ ( t ) 1 r e q , λ ( t ) ( x ) n k , λ λ , q = 1 2 ( [ n ] q ) k B n k , q ( r ) ( λ ) + l = 0 n k n k l q ( 1 ) l , λ B n k l , q ( r ) ( λ ) .

From (90) and (91), we have

B n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) = k = 0 1 2 ( [ n ] q ) k B n k , q ( r ) ( λ ) + l = 0 n k n k l q ( 1 ) l , λ B n k l , q ( r ) ( λ ) E k , q ( x λ ) .

We showed that E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) and B n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) can be represented as linear combinations of { B 0 , q ( x λ ) , B 1 , q ( x λ ) , B n , q ( x λ ) } and { E 0 , q ( x λ ) , E n , q ( x λ ) } , respectively.

4 Some identities of degenerate q-Bernoulli polynomials and degenerate q-Euler polynomials arising from λ -q-umbral calculus

In this section, we investigate some identities of degenerate q-Bernoulli polynomials and degenerate q-Euler polynomials arising from λ -q-umbral calculus. We find a formula for expressing any polynomials as a linear combination of degenerate q-Bernoulli polynomials and degenerate q-Euler polynomials with explicit coefficients, respectively.

Theorem 16

For n 0 , we have

E n , q ( r ) ( λ ) = j 1 + + j r = n n j 1 , , j r q E j 1 , q ( λ ) E j r , q ( λ ) , a n d B n , q ( r ) ( λ ) = j 1 + + j r = n n j 1 , , j r q B j 1 , q ( λ ) B j r , q ( λ ) ,

where

n j 1 , , j r q = [ n ] q ! [ j 1 ] q ! [ j r ] q ! ,

and E n , q ( λ ) and B n , q ( λ ) are the degenerate q-Euler and the degenerate q-Bernoulli numbers, respectively.

Proof

From (43) and Theorem 12, we have

(92) E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) e q , λ ( t ) + 1 2 r , t λ , q .

From Theorem 13, we note that

(93) ( t ) λ , q E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) = [ n ] q E n 1 , q ( r ) ( x λ ) .

From (43) and (45), we have

(94) 2 e q , λ ( t ) + 1 r e q , λ y ( t ) ( x ) n , λ λ , q = E n , q ( r ) ( y λ ) = l = 0 n l q E n l , q ( r ) ( λ ) ( y ) l , λ .

By (22), (40), and (43), we have

(95) E n , q ( r ) ( λ ) = 2 e q , λ ( t ) + 1 r ( x ) n , λ λ , q = j 1 + + j r = n n j 1 , , j r q E j 1 , q ( λ ) E j r , q ( λ ) ,

where

n j 1 , , j r q = [ n ] q ! [ j 1 ] q ! [ j r ] q ! .

From (95), we obtain the first identity.

In the same way as the degenerate q-Euler numbers order r , we have the second identity.□

Theorem 17

For n N { 0 } , we have the following two identities.

  1. Let p ( x ) = l = 0 n α l , q B l , q ( x λ ) P n . Then we have

    α l , q = 1 [ l ] q ! e q , λ ( t ) 1 t t j p ( x ) λ , q .

  2. Let p ( x ) = l = 0 n α l , q E l , q ( x λ ) P n . Then we have

    α l , q = 1 [ l ] q ! e q , λ ( t ) + 1 2 t j p ( x ) λ , q .

Proof

From Theorem 13, let p ( x ) = l = 0 n α l , q B l , q ( x λ ) P n . Then, we observe that

(96) e q , λ ( t ) 1 t t j l = 0 n α l , q B l , q ( x λ ) λ , q = l = 0 n α l , q e q , λ ( t ) 1 t t j B l , q ( x λ ) λ , q = l = 0 n α l , q [ l ] q ! δ j , l = [ l ] q ! α l , q .

From (96), we have the first identity.

Let p ( x ) = l = 0 n α l , q E l , q ( x λ ) P n . In the same way as mentioned earlier, we have the second identity.□

Theorem 18

For n N { 0 } , we have

B n , q ( x λ ) = E n , q ( x λ ) + [ n ] q 2 ( 1 + 2 B n 1 , q ( λ ) ) E n 1 , q ( x λ ) + l = 0 n 2 n l q { B n l , q ( λ ) E l , q ( x λ ) } .

Proof

Let p ( x ) = B n , q ( x λ ) P n . Then, from Theorem 17 (ii), we have

(97) p ( x ) = B n , q ( x λ ) = l = 0 n α l , q E l , q ( x λ ) , ( n 0 ) ,

where

(98) α l , q = 1 2 [ l ] q ! ( e q , λ ( t ) + 1 ) t l B n , q ( x λ ) λ , q = [ n ] q [ n 1 ] q [ n l + 1 ] q 2 [ l ] q ! e q , λ ( t ) + 1 B n l , q ( x λ ) λ , q = 1 2 n l q e q , λ ( t ) + 1 B n l , q ( x λ ) λ , q = 1 2 n l q { B n l , q ( 1 λ ) + B n l , q ( λ ) } .

By Theorem 13, we observe that

(99) ( t ) λ , q B n , q ( x λ ) = [ n ] q B n 1 , q ( x ) λ , ( n 0 ) .

From (99), we observe that

(100) t = j = 0 B j , q ( λ ) t j [ j ] q ! ( e q , λ ( t ) 1 ) = n = 0 j = 0 n n j q B j , q ( λ ) ( 1 ) n j , λ t n [ n ] q ! n = 0 B n , q ( λ ) t n [ n ] q ! .

By (100), we obtain

(101) B 0 , q ( λ ) = 1 ,

and

(102) B n , q ( 1 λ ) B n , q ( λ ) = 1 if n = 1 , 0 if n > 1 .

From (97), (98), (101), and (102), we attain the desired result.□

Theorem 19

For n N { 0 } , we have

E n , q ( x λ ) = l = 0 n 2 [ n l + 1 ] q n l q E n l + 1 , q ( λ ) B l , q ( x λ ) .

Proof

Let p ( x ) = E n , q ( x λ ) P n . Then, from Theorem 17 (i), we have

(103) p ( x ) = E n , q ( x λ ) = l = 0 n α l , q B l , q ( x λ ) , ( n 0 ) ,

where

(104) α l , q = 1 [ l ] q ! e q , λ ( t ) 1 t t l E n , q ( x λ ) λ , q = 1 [ l ] q ! [ n + 1 ] q ( e q , λ ( t ) 1 ) t l E n + 1 , q ( x λ ) λ , q = 1 [ l ] q ! [ n + 1 ] q [ n + 1 ] q [ n ] q [ n + 1 l + 1 ] q e q , λ ( t ) 1 E n l + 1 , q ( x λ ) λ , q = 1 [ n l + 1 ] q n l q e q , λ ( t ) 1 E n l + 1 , q ( x λ ) λ , q = 1 [ n l + 1 ] q n l q { E n l + 1 , q ( 1 λ ) E n l + 1 , q ( λ ) } .

On the other hand, by (34) and (40), we observe that

(105) 2 = j = 0 E j , q ( λ ) t j [ j ] q ! ( e q , λ ( t ) + 1 ) = n = 0 j = 0 n n j q E j , q ( λ ) ( x ) n j , λ t n [ n ] q ! + n = 0 E n , q ( λ ) t n [ n ] q ! = n = 0 ( E n , q ( 1 λ ) + E n , q ( λ ) ) t n [ n ] q ! .

By comparing the coefficients of both sides of (105), we obtain

(106) E 0 , q ( 1 λ ) + E 0 , q ( λ ) = 2 , E n , q ( 1 λ ) + E n , q ( λ ) = 0 , if n 1 .

From (103), (104), and (106), we have the desired result.□

Theorem 20

For n N { 0 } and r 2 , we have

E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) = l = 0 n n l q E n l , q ( r 1 ) ( λ ) E l , q ( x λ ) .

Proof

Let p ( x ) = E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) P n . By Theorem 17 (ii), we obtain

(107) E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) = l = 0 n α l , q E l , q ( x λ ) ,

where, by Theorem 13 and (43),

(108) α l , q = 1 2 [ l ] q ! ( e q , λ ( t ) + 1 ) t l p ( x ) λ , q = 1 2 [ l ] q ! e q , λ ( t ) + 1 ( t l ) λ ( E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) ) λ , q = 1 2 n l q e q , λ ( t ) + 1 E n l , q ( r ) ( x λ ) λ , q = 1 2 n l q { E n l , q ( r ) ( 1 λ ) + E n l , q ( r ) ( λ ) } .

On the other hand, from (43), we observe that

(109) n = 0 { E n , q ( r ) ( 1 λ ) + E n , q ( r ) ( λ ) } t n [ n ] q ! = 2 e q , λ ( t ) + 1 r ( e q , λ ( t ) + 1 ) = 2 2 e q , λ ( t ) + 1 r 1 = 2 n = 0 E n , q ( r 1 ) ( λ ) t n [ n ] q ! .

By comparing the coefficients on the both sides of (109), we obtain

(110) E n , q ( r ) ( 1 λ ) + E n , q ( r ) ( λ ) = 2 E n , q ( r 1 ) ( λ ) , ( n 0 ) .

Thus, by (107), (108), and (110), we have the desired result.□

Theorem 21

For n N { 0 } and r N , we have

E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) = l = 0 n 1 [ n l + 1 ] q n l q { E n l + 1 , q ( r ) ( 1 λ ) E n l + 1 , q ( r ) ( λ ) } B l , q ( x λ ) .

Proof

Let p ( x ) = E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) P n . Then, from Theorem 17 (i), we obtain

(111) E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) = l = 0 n α l , q B l , q ( x λ ) .

Here, by Theorem 13, we obtain

(112)□ α l , q = 1 [ l ] q ! e q , λ ( t ) 1 t t l E n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) λ , q = 1 [ l ] q ! 1 [ n + 1 ] q ( e q , λ ( t ) 1 ) t l E n + 1 , q ( r ) ( x λ ) λ , q = 1 [ n l + 1 ] q n l q e q , λ ( t ) 1 E n + 1 l , q ( r ) ( x λ ) λ , q = 1 [ n l + 1 ] q n l q { E n l + 1 , q ( r ) ( 1 λ ) E n l + 1 , q ( r ) ( λ ) } .

Theorem 22

For n N { 0 } and r N , we have

B n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) = j = 0 1 2 n j q { B n j , q ( r ) ( 1 λ ) + B n j , q ( r ) ( λ ) } E j , q ( x ) .

Proof

By (34) and (39), we easily obtain

(113) B n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) = l = 0 n n l q B n l , q ( λ ) ( x ) l , λ P n .

Take p ( x ) = B n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) P n . From Theorem 17 (ii), we obtain

(114) B n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) = j = 0 n α j , q E j , q ( x ) ,

where, from (41) and (58), we observe that

(115) α j , q = 1 2 [ j ] q ! ( e q , λ ( t ) + 1 ) t j B n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) λ , q = 1 2 n j q e q , λ ( t ) + 1 B n j , q ( r ) ( x λ ) λ , q = 1 2 n j q { B n j , q ( r ) ( 1 λ ) + B n j , q ( r ) ( λ ) } .

Combining (114) with (115), we obtain the desired result.□

Theorem 23

For n N { 0 } and r 2 , we have

B n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) = j = 0 n 1 n j q [ n j + 1 ] q [ n j + 2 ] q B n j , q ( r 1 ) ( λ ) .

Proof

Let p ( x ) = B n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) P n . From Theorem 17 (i), we have B n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) = j = 0 n α j , q B j , q ( x ) and

(116) α j , q = 1 [ j ] q ! e q , λ ( t ) 1 t t j B n , q ( r ) ( x λ ) λ , q = 1 [ j ] q ! 1 [ n + 1 ] q ( e q , λ ( t ) 1 ) t j B n + 1 , q ( r ) ( x λ ) λ , q = 1 [ n j + 1 ] q n j q e q , λ ( t ) 1 B n j + 1 , q ( r ) ( x λ ) λ , q = 1 [ n j + 1 ] q n j q { B n j + 1 , q ( r ) ( 1 λ ) B n j + 1 , q ( r ) ( λ ) } .

On the other hand, by (41), we observe that

(117) n = 0 { B n , q ( r ) ( 1 λ ) B n , q ( r ) ( λ ) } t n [ n ] q ! = t e q , λ ( t ) 1 r ( e q , λ ( t ) 1 ) = t t e q , λ ( t ) 1 r 1 = t n = 0 B n , q ( r 1 ) ( λ ) t n [ n ] q ! = n = 1 B n 1 , q ( r 1 ) ( λ ) t n [ n + 1 ] q ! = 1 [ n + 1 ] q n = 1 B n 1 , q ( r 1 ) ( λ ) t n [ n ] q ! .

By comparing the coefficients of both sides of (117), we obtain

(118) B n , q ( r ) ( 1 λ ) B n , q ( r ) ( λ ) = 1 [ n + 1 ] q B n 1 , q ( r 1 ) ( λ ) , n 1 and B 0 , q ( r ) ( 1 λ ) B 0 , q ( r ) ( λ ) = 0 .

From (116) and (118), we have the desired result.□

5 Conclusion

In this article, we introduced the degenerate q-exponential functions, the degenerate q-Bernoulli polynomials of order r (higher-order degenerate q-Bernoulli polynomials), and degenerate q-Euler polynomials of order r (higher-order degenerate q-Euler polynomials) ( r N ). We also defined a family of λ -q-linear functionals (45) on the space of polynomials and a family of λ -q-differential operators (58) adapted to the family of λ -q-linear functionals. We showed that there exists a unique sequence s n , q ( x ) ( deg s n , q ( x ) = n ) of polynomials satisfying the orthogonal condition in Theorem 9. In Theorem 12, we investigated for λ -q-Sheffer polynomial and provided some applications of the formula. We mention that the family { s n , q ( x λ ) } λ R of λ -q-Sheffer sequences s n , q ( x λ ) are called the degenerate sequences for the Sheffer polynomial s n , q ( x ) , where lim λ 0 s n , q ( x λ ) = s n , q ( x ) . In Theorem 15, we showed the formula expressing one λ -q-Sheffer polynomial in terms of another λ -q-Sheffer polynomial and provided applications of the formula. As applications of λ -q-Sheffer sequences, we investigated several formulas for expressing any polynomials as a linear combination of degenerate q-Bernoulli polynomials and degenerate q-Euler polynomials with explicit coefficients, respectively, in Theorem 17. By using Theorem 17, we obtained many interesting identities. Hence, for future projects, we would like to conduct research on some potential applications of λ -q-umbral calculus derived in this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jangjeon Institute for Mathematical Science for the support of this research.

  1. Funding information: The third author of this work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program, the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021R1F1A1050151).

  2. Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to this work.

  3. Conflict of interest: All authors declare no conflict of interest.

  4. Ethics approval and consent to participate: All authors declare that there is no ethical problem in the production of this article.

  5. Consent for publication: All authors want to publish this article in this journal.

  6. Data availability statement: Not applicable.

References

[1] S. Roman and G. Rota, The umbral calculus, Adv. Math. 27 (1978), 95–188, https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8708(78)90087-7. Search in Google Scholar

[2] G. Rota, D. Kahaner, and A. Odlyzko, On the foundations of combinatorial theory VIII: Finite operator calculus, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 42 (1973), 684–760, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(73)90172-8. Search in Google Scholar

[3] E. C. Ihrig and M. E. H. Ismail, A q-umbral calculus, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 84 (1981), 178–207, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(81)90159-1. Search in Google Scholar

[4] S. Roman, More on the umbral calculus, with emphasis on the q-umbral calculus, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 107 (1985), 222–254, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(85)90367-1. Search in Google Scholar

[5] R. Dere and Y. Simsek, Applications of umbral algebra to some special polynomials, Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 22 (2012), no. 3, 433–438. Search in Google Scholar

[6] L. Carlitz, q-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials, Duke Math. J. 15 (1948), 987–1000, https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-48-01588-9. Search in Google Scholar

[7] L. Carlitz, q-Bernoulli and Eulerian numbers, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 76 (1954), 332–350, https://doi.org/10.2307/1990772. Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Açikgöz, D. Erdal, and S. Araci, A new approach to q-Bernoulli numbers and q-Bernoulli polynomials related to q-Bernstein polynomials, Adv. Difference Equ. 2010 (2010), Art. ID 951764, 9 p, https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/951764. Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. Ačikgöz, R. Ates, U. Duran, and S. Araci, Applications of q-umbral calculus to modified apostol type q-Bernoulli polynomials, J. Math. Statist. 14 (2018), no. 1, 7.15, https://doi.org/10.3844/jmssp.2018.7.15. Search in Google Scholar

[10] A. Bayad and T. Kim, Identities involving values of Bernstein, q-Bernstein, q-Bernoulli, and q-Euler polynomials, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 18 (2011), no. 2, 133–143, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1101.2611. Search in Google Scholar

[11] T. Ernst, Examples of a q-umbral calculus, Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 16 (2008), no. 1, 1–22. Search in Google Scholar

[12] A. S. Hegazi and M. Mansour, A note on q-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 13 (2006), no. 1, 9–18, https://doi.org/10.2991/jnmp.2006.13.1.2. Search in Google Scholar

[13] M. E. H. Ismail and M. Rahman, Inverse operators, q-fractional integrals, and q-Bernoulli polynomials, J. Approx. Theory 114 (2002), no. 2, 269–307, https://doi.org/10.1006/jath.2001.3644. Search in Google Scholar

[14] D. S. Kim and T. Kim, q-Bernoulli polynomials and q-umbral calculus, Sci. China Math. 57 (2014), 1867–1874, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-014-4821-3. Search in Google Scholar

[15] D. S. Kim and T. Kim, Some identities of q-Euler polynomials arising from q-umbral calculus, 2014 (2014), 12pp, https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2014-1. Search in Google Scholar

[16] T. Kim, q-Bernoulli numbers associated with q-Stirling numbers, Adv. Difference Equ. 2008 (2008), Article ID 743295, p. 10, https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/743295. Search in Google Scholar

[17] T. Kim, q-Generalized Euler numbers and polynomials, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 13 (2006), 293–298, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061920806030058. Search in Google Scholar

[18] T. Kim, q-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials associated with Gaussian binomial coefficients, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 15 (2008), no. 1, 51–57, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061920808010068. Search in Google Scholar

[19] T. Kim, D. S. Kim, and H. K. Kim, On q-derangement numbers and poynomials, Fractals. 30 (2022), no. 10, 2240200, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22402009. Search in Google Scholar

[20] T. Kim, D. S. Kim, D. V. Dolgy, and J.-W. Park, On the type 2 poly-Bernoulli polynomials associated with umbral calculus, Open Math. 19 (2021), no. 1, 878–887, https://doi.org/10.1515/math-2021-0086. Search in Google Scholar

[21] B. O. Kupershmidt, Reflection symmetries of q-Bernoulli polynomials, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 12 (2005), suppl. 1, 412–422, https://doi.org/10.2991/jnmp.2005.12.s1.34. Search in Google Scholar

[22] V. Kurt and M. Cenkci, A new approach to q-Genocchi numbers and polynomials, Bull Korean Math Soc. 47 (2010), 575–583, https://doi.org/10.4134/BKMS.2010.47.3.575. Search in Google Scholar

[23] N. I. Mahmudov, On a class of q-Bernoulli and q-Euler polynomials, Adv. Difference Equ. 2013 (2013), 108, 11pp. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-108. Search in Google Scholar

[24] N. I. Mahmudov and M. E. Keleshteri, On a class of generalized q-Bernoulli and q-Euler polynomials, Adv. Difference Equ. 2013 (2013), 115, https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-115. Search in Google Scholar

[25] S.-H. Rim, A. Bayad, E.-J. Moon, J.-H. Jin, and S.-J. Lee, A new construction on the q-Bernoulli polynomials, Adv. Difference Equ. 2011 (2011), 34, https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2011-34. Search in Google Scholar

[26] A. Sharma, q-Bernoulli and Euler numbers of higher order, Duke Math. J. 25 (1958), 343–353, https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-58-02531-6. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Q. Zou, Irreducible factors of the q-Lah numbers over Z, 12 (2017), E1, p. 7. Search in Google Scholar

[28] L. Carlitz, Degenerate Stirling, Bernoulli and Eulerian numbers, Utilitas Math. 15 (1979), 51–88. Search in Google Scholar

[29] L-C. Jang, D. S. Kim, H. Kim, T. Kim, and H. Lee, Study of Degenerate Poly-Bernoulli Polynomials by λ-Umbral Calculus, CMES. Sci. 129 (2021), no. 1, 393–408, https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2021.016917. Search in Google Scholar

[30] D. S. Kim and T. Kim, Degenerate Sheffer sequence and λ-Sheffer sequence, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 493 (2021), no. 1, 124521, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2020.124521. Search in Google Scholar

[31] D. S. Kim and T. A. Kim, Note on a new type of degenerate Bernoulli numbers, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 27 (2020), no. 2, 227–235, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061920820020090. Search in Google Scholar

[32] H. K. Kim, Degenerate Lah-Bell polynomials arising from degenerate Sheffer sequences, Adv. Difference Equ. 2020 (2020), 687, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03152-4. Search in Google Scholar

[33] H. K. Kim and D. Dolgy, Degenerate Catalan-Daehee numbers and polynomials of order r arising from degenerate umbral calculus, AIMS. 7 (2021), no. 3, 3845–3865, https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022213. Search in Google Scholar

[34] T. Kim, A note on degenerate Stirling polynomials of the second kind, Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 20 (2017), no. 3, 319–331, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.02290. Search in Google Scholar

[35] T. Kim, D. S. Kim, H. Lee, and J. Kwon, Degenerate binomial coefficients and degenerate hypergeometric functions, Adv. Difference Equ. 2020 (2020), 115, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02575-3. Search in Google Scholar

[36] T. Kim, D. S. Kim, L.-C. Jang, H. Lee, and H. Kim, Representations of degenerate Hermite polynomials, Adv. Appl. Math. 139 (2022), Paper No. 102359, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aam.2022.102359. Search in Google Scholar

[37] T. Kim, D. S. Kim, H. Lee, S. Park, and J. W. Park, A study on λ-Sheffer sequences by other λ-Sheffer sequences, J. Nonlin. Convex Analy. 23 (2022), no. 2, 321–336. Search in Google Scholar

[38] T. Kim, D. S. Kim, H.-Y. Kim, H. Lee, and L.-C. Jang, Degenerate Bell polynomials associated with umbral calculus, J. Inequal. Appl. 2020 (2020), 226, 15 pp, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-020-02494-7. Search in Google Scholar

[39] L. Comtet, Advanced Combinatorics. The Art of Finite and Infinite Expansions, Revised and enlarged edition, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, 1974, xi+343 pp. ISBN: 90-277-0441-4 05-02. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-04-29
Revised: 2022-09-20
Accepted: 2022-10-11
Published Online: 2022-11-25

© 2022 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. On some summation formulas
  3. A study of a meromorphic perturbation of the sine family
  4. Asymptotic behavior of even-order noncanonical neutral differential equations
  5. Unconditionally positive NSFD and classical finite difference schemes for biofilm formation on medical implant using Allen-Cahn equation
  6. Starlike and convexity properties of q-Bessel-Struve functions
  7. Mathematical modeling and optimal control of the impact of rumors on the banking crisis
  8. On linear chaos in function spaces
  9. Convergence of generalized sampling series in weighted spaces
  10. Persistence landscapes of affine fractals
  11. Inertial iterative method with self-adaptive step size for finite family of split monotone variational inclusion and fixed point problems in Banach spaces
  12. Various notions of module amenability on weighted semigroup algebras
  13. Regularity and normality in hereditary bi m-spaces
  14. On a first-order differential system with initial and nonlocal boundary conditions
  15. On solving pseudomonotone equilibrium problems via two new extragradient-type methods under convex constraints
  16. Local linear approach: Conditional density estimate for functional and censored data
  17. Some properties of graded generalized 2-absorbing submodules
  18. Eigenvalue inclusion sets for linear response eigenvalue problems
  19. Some integral inequalities for generalized left and right log convex interval-valued functions based upon the pseudo-order relation
  20. More properties of generalized open sets in generalized topological spaces
  21. An extragradient inertial algorithm for solving split fixed-point problems of demicontractive mappings, with equilibrium and variational inequality problems
  22. An accurate and efficient local one-dimensional method for the 3D acoustic wave equation
  23. On a weighted elliptic equation of N-Kirchhoff type with double exponential growth
  24. On split feasibility problem for finite families of equilibrium and fixed point problems in Banach spaces
  25. Entire and meromorphic solutions for systems of the differential difference equations
  26. Multiplication operators on the Banach algebra of bounded Φ-variation functions on compact subsets of ℂ
  27. Mannheim curves and their partner curves in Minkowski 3-space E13
  28. Characterizations of the group invertibility of a matrix revisited
  29. Iterates of q-Bernstein operators on triangular domain with all curved sides
  30. Data analysis-based time series forecast for managing household electricity consumption
  31. A robust study of the transmission dynamics of zoonotic infection through non-integer derivative
  32. A Dai-Liao-type projection method for monotone nonlinear equations and signal processing
  33. Review Article
  34. Remarks on some variants of minimal point theorem and Ekeland variational principle with applications
  35. Special Issue on Recent Methods in Approximation Theory - Part I
  36. Coupled fixed point theorems under new coupled implicit relation in Hilbert spaces
  37. Approximation of integrable functions by general linear matrix operators of their Fourier series
  38. Sharp sufficient condition for the convergence of greedy expansions with errors in coefficient computation
  39. Approximation of conic sections by weighted Lupaş post-quantum Bézier curves
  40. On the generalized growth and approximation of entire solutions of certain elliptic partial differential equation
  41. Existence results for ABC-fractional BVP via new fixed point results of F-Lipschitzian mappings
  42. Linear barycentric rational collocation method for solving biharmonic equation
  43. A note on the convergence of Phillips operators by the sequence of functions via q-calculus
  44. Taylor’s series expansions for real powers of two functions containing squares of inverse cosine function, closed-form formula for specific partial Bell polynomials, and series representations for real powers of Pi
  45. Special Issue on Recent Advances in Fractional Calculus and Nonlinear Fractional Evaluation Equations - Part I
  46. Positive solutions for fractional differential equation at resonance under integral boundary conditions
  47. Source term model for elasticity system with nonlinear dissipative term in a thin domain
  48. A numerical study of anomalous electro-diffusion cells in cable sense with a non-singular kernel
  49. On Opial-type inequality for a generalized fractional integral operator
  50. Special Issue on Advances in Integral Transforms and Analysis of Differential Equations with Applications
  51. Mathematical analysis of a MERS-Cov coronavirus model
  52. Rapid exponential stabilization of nonlinear continuous systems via event-triggered impulsive control
  53. Novel soliton solutions for the fractional three-wave resonant interaction equations
  54. The multistep Laplace optimized decomposition method for solving fractional-order coronavirus disease model (COVID-19) via the Caputo fractional approach
  55. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear Analysis
  56. Some recent results on singular p-Laplacian equations
  57. Infinitely many solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equations with sign-changing nonlinearity without the aid of 4-superlinear at infinity
  58. Special Issue on Recent Advances for Computational and Mathematical Methods in Scientific Problems
  59. Existence of solutions for a nonlinear problem at resonance
  60. Asymptotic stability of solutions for a diffusive epidemic model
  61. Special Issue on Computational and Numerical Methods for Special Functions - Part I
  62. Fully degenerate Bernoulli numbers and polynomials
  63. Wigner-Ville distribution and ambiguity function associated with the quaternion offset linear canonical transform
  64. Some identities related to degenerate Stirling numbers of the second kind
  65. Two identities and closed-form formulas for the Bernoulli numbers in terms of central factorial numbers of the second kind
  66. λ-q-Sheffer sequence and its applications
  67. Special Issue on Fixed Point Theory and Applications to Various Differential/Integral Equations - Part I
  68. General decay for a nonlinear pseudo-parabolic equation with viscoelastic term
  69. Generalized common fixed point theorem for generalized hybrid mappings in Hilbert spaces
  70. Computation of solution of integral equations via fixed point results
  71. Characterizations of quasi-metric and G-metric completeness involving w-distances and fixed points
  72. Notes on continuity result for conformable diffusion equation on the sphere: The linear case
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dema-2022-0174/html
Scroll to top button