Home Regularity and normality in hereditary bi m-spaces
Article Open Access

Regularity and normality in hereditary bi m-spaces

  • Ahmad Al-Omari EMAIL logo , Samer Al Ghour and Takashi Noiri
Published/Copyright: June 18, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Quite recently, a new minimal structure m H and an m n - g -closed set have been introduced in a previous study [T. Noiri and V. Popa, Closed sets in hereditary bi m-spaces, Questions Answers General Topol. 38 (2020), 133–142] by using two minimal structures m, n and a hereditary class . In this paper, we introduce and investigate the notions of ( m , n ) - g -regularity and ( m , n ) - g -normality in a hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) .

MSC 2010: 54A05; 54A10; 54D15

1 Introduction

A subfamily m of P ( X ) is called a minimal structure on X [1] if m and X m . Ozbakir and Yildirim [2] introduced and investigated the m-local function and minimal -closure in a minimal space ( X , m ) with an ideal on X . And they constructed the minimal structure m containing m. The notion of m- g -closed sets was defined and investigated in [2]. In [3], the authors introduced the minimal local function on a minimal space ( X , m ) with a hereditary class and constructed a minimal structure m H which contains m. They also introduced and investigated the notions of m- g -closed sets in a minimal space ( X , m ) with a hereditary class . They obtained decompositions of m H -closed sets by using m- g -closed sets.

On the other hand, Noiri [4] introduced m n g -closed sets in a bi m-space ( X , m , n ) and used them to obtain the characterizations of ( m , n ) -normality in ( X , m , n ) . Furthermore, Noiri and Popa [5] introduced and investigated the notion of m n - g -closed sets in a hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) .

In this paper, by using m n - g -closed sets, we introduce and investigate the notions of ( m , n ) - g -regularity and ( m , n ) - g -normality in a hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) . As a result, we obtain characterizations of g -regularity and g -normality in the sense of Munshi [6] in a topological space ( X , τ ) . Recently, as related spaces with those of the present paper, many authors studied and the notions of m n - g -regular, m n - -regular, ( m , n ) -normal and m n g - -normal spaces are given in [7] and that of m n - g -closed is given in [8]. Also papers [9,10,11, 12,13,14] have introduced some property related to regularity and normality spaces.

2 Minimal structures

Definition 2.1

A subfamily m of the power set P ( X ) of a nonempty set X is called a minimal structure (briefly m-structure) [15] on X if m and X m .

By ( X , m ) , we denote a nonempty set X with a minimal structure m on X and call it an m-space. Each member of m is said to be m-open and the complement of an m-open set is said to be m-closed. For a point x X , the family { U : x U and U m } is denoted by m ( x ) .

Definition 2.2

Let ( X , m ) be an m-space and A be a subset of X . The m-closure mCl( A ) (resp. m-interior mInt( A )) of A [15] is defined by mCl( A ) = { F X : A F , X F m } (resp. mInt( A ) = { U X : U A , U m } ).

Lemma 2.3

[15]. Let X be a nonempty set and m be a minimal structure on X. For subsets A and B of X, the following properties hold:

  1. A m Cl ( A ) and m Cl ( A ) = A if A is m-closed;

  2. m Cl ( ) = , m Cl ( X ) = X ;

  3. If A B , then m Cl ( A ) m Cl ( B ) ;

  4. m Cl ( A ) m Cl ( B ) m Cl ( A B ) ;

  5. m Cl ( m Cl ( A ) ) = m Cl ( A ) ;

  6. m Cl ( X A ) = X m Int ( A ) .

Definition 2.4

A minimal structure m on a set X is said to have property [15] if the union of any collection of elements of m is an element of m.

Lemma 2.5

[1] Let ( X , m ) be an m-space and A be a subset of X.

  1. x m Cl ( A ) if and only if U A for every U m ( x ) .

  2. Let m have property . Then the following properties hold:

    1. A is m-closed (resp. m-open) if and only if m Cl ( A ) = A (resp. m Int ( A ) = A );

    2. m Cl ( A ) is m-closed and mInt A ) is m-open.

Definition 2.6

A nonempty subfamily of P ( X ) is called a hereditary class on X [16] if it satisfies the following property: A and B A imply B . A hereditary class is called an ideal if it satisfies the additional condition: A and B imply A B .

A minimal space ( X , m ) with a hereditary class on X is called a hereditary minimal space (briefly hereditary m-space) and is denoted by ( X , m , ) .

Definition 2.7

[3] Let ( X , m , ) be a hereditary m-space. For a subset A of X , the minimal local function A m H ( , m) of A is defined as follows:

A m H ( , m ) = { x X : U A for every U m ( x ) } .

Hereafter, A m H ( , m) is simply denoted by A m H .

If m = τ is a topology and = is an ideal, then A m H is A in [17].

Remark 2.8

[3] Let ( X , m , ) be a hereditary m-space and A be a subset of X . If = { } (resp. P ( X ) ), then A m H = m Cl ( A ) (resp. A m H = ).

Lemma 2.9

[3] Let ( X , m , ) be a hereditary m-space. For subsets A and B of X, the following properties hold:

  1. If A B , then A m H B m H ;

  2. A m H = m Cl ( A m H ) m Cl ( A ) ;

  3. A m H B m H ( A B ) m H ;

  4. ( A m H ) m H ( A A m H ) m H = A m H ;

  5. If A , then A m H = .

Definition 2.10

[3] Let ( X , m , ) be a hereditary m-space and A be a subset of X . The minimal -closure mCl H ( A ) of A is defined as mCl H ( A ) = A A m H . The m H -structure is defined as follows: m H = { U X : m Cl H ( X U ) = X U } . Each member of m H is said to be m H - o p e n and the complement of an m H -open set is said to be m H - c l o s e d .

Lemma 2.11

[3] Let ( X , m , ) be a hereditary m-space and A, B be two subsets of X. Then, the following properties hold:

  1. A m Cl H ( A ) ;

  2. m Cl H ( ) = and mCl H ( X ) = X ;

  3. If A B , then m Cl H ( A ) m Cl H ( B ) ;

  4. m Cl H ( A ) m Cl H ( B ) m Cl H ( A B ) ;

  5. m Cl H ( m Cl H ( A ) ) = m Cl H ( A ) , that is, m Cl H ( A ) is m H -closed.

Lemma 2.12

[3] For a hereditary m-space ( X , m , ) , the following properties hold:

  1. m H is an m-structure on X such that m H has property and m m H ;

  2. m Cl H ( A ) = m H Cl ( A ) for every subset A of X ;

  3. β ( m , ) = { U H : U m , H } is a basis for m H such that m β ( m , ) .

Lemma 2.13

Let ( X , m , ) be a hereditary m-space. If = { } , then m H = { U X : m Int ( U ) = U } .

Proof

By Remark 2.8, we have mCl H ( A ) = A m H A = m Cl ( A ) A = m Cl ( A ) for every subset A of X and hence m H = { U X : m Cl H ( X U ) = X U } = { U X : m Cl ( X U ) = X U } = { U X : m Int ( U ) = U } .□

Hereafter, m { } is simply denoted by m 0 . Then, by Lemmas 2.12 and 2.13, we have the following lemma.

Lemma 2.14

Let ( X , m ) be a minimal space. Then the following hold:

  1. m 0 is a minimal structure such that m 0 has property and m m 0 ;

  2. If m has property , then m 0 = m .

In Lemma 2.14, m = m 0 is not always true as shown by the following example.

Example 2.15

Let X = { a , b , c , d } , m = { X , , { a } , { c } , { a , b } } and A = { a , c } . Then the minimal structure m does not have property and A m 0 but A m .

3 Regularity in a hereditary bi m-space

A set X with two minimal structures m , n is called a bi m-space [4] and is denoted by ( X , m , n ) . A set X with two minimal structures m , n and a hereditary class is called a hereditary bi m-space and is denoted by ( X , m , n , ) . In this section, we introduce the notion of m n - g - c l o s e d sets and investigate their basic properties and several characterizations.

Definition 3.1

Let ( X , m , n , ) be a hereditary bi m-space. A subset A of X is said to be m n - g - c l o s e d (resp. m n g -closed [4]) if A n H U (resp. n Cl ( A ) U ) whenever A U and U m . A subset A of X is said to be m n - g -open (resp. m n g -open [4]) if the complement of A is m n - g -closed (resp. m n g -closed).

If m = n = τ is a topology and = is an ideal (resp. = { } ), then m n - g -closed (resp. m n g -closed) is g -closed [18] (resp. g -closed [19]).

Proposition 3.2

For a subset of a hereditary m n -space ( X , m , n , ) , the following diagram holds:

DIAGRAM I

n -closed n H -closed m n g -closed m n - g -closed

Lemma 3.3

Let A be a subset of a hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) .

  1. A is m n - g -closed if and only if n Cl ( A ) U whenever A U and U m .

  2. A is m n - g -open [5] if and only if F n Int H ( A ) whenever F A and F is m-closed.

Definition 3.4

A subset N of a hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) is called an m n - g -neighborhood (resp. n -neighborhood) of a subset B of X , if there exists an m n - g -open (resp. n -open) set U such that B U N .

Definition 3.5

A hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) , is said to be ( m , n ) - g - r e g u l a r if for each m-closed set A and each point x A , there exist disjoint m n - g -open sets U , V such that x U and A V .

Theorem 3.6

For a hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) , the following properties are equivalent:

  1. X is ( m , n ) - g -regular.

  2. For any m-open set U containing x X , there exists an m n - g -open set V such that x V n Cl ( V ) U .

  3. For any m-closed set A , the intersection of all m n - g -closed neighborhoods of A is A .

  4. For any set A and any m-open set B such that A B , there exists an m n - g -open set U such that A U and n Cl ( U ) B .

  5. For any nonempty set A and any m-closed set B such that A B = , there exist disjoint m n - g -open sets U , V such that A U and B V .

Proof

(1) (2): Let U be an m-open set such that x U . Then X U is an m-closed set not containing x . By hypothesis, there exist disjoint m n - g -open sets V , W such that x V and X U W . By Lemma 3.3, X U n Int ( W ) and so X n Int ( W ) U . Now V W = implies that V n Int ( W ) = and hence n Cl ( V ) X n Int ( W ) . Thus, x V n Cl ( V ) U .

(2) (3): Let A be an m-closed set and x A . Then X A is an m-open set containing x . By hypothesis, there exists an m n - g -open set V such that x V n Cl ( V ) X A . Thus, A X n Cl ( V ) X V . Since X n Cl ( V ) is n -open and hence m n - g -open, then X V is an m n - g -closed neighborhood of A and x X V . This shows that A is the intersection of all the m n - g -closed neighborhoods of A .

(3) (4): Let A be any set and B be any m-open set such that A B . Let x A B . Then, X B is m-closed and x X B . By hypothesis, there exists an m n - g -closed neighborhood V of X B such that x V . Let X B G V , where G is m n - g -open. Then U = X V is an m n - g -open set such that x U and A U .

Furthermore, X G is m n - g -closed, X G B and B is m-open, which implies that n Cl ( U ) = n Cl ( X V ) n Cl ( X G ) B .

(4) (5): Let A be any nonempty set and B be any m-closed set such that A B = . Then X B is an m-open set and A ( X B ) . By hypothesis, there exists an m n - g -open set U such that A U and U n Cl H ( U ) X B . Let V = X n Cl ( U ) . Then U and V are m n - g -open sets such that B X n Cl ( U ) = V .

(5) (1): Let B be an m-closed set and x B . Put A = { x } . Then, there exists disjoint m n - g -open sets U , V such that A U and B V , hence x U . Thus, X is m n g -regular.□

Theorem 3.7

If every m-open subset of a hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) is n -closed, then X is m n g -regular.

Proof

Suppose every m-open subset of X is n -closed. Let A X and U be any m-open set containing A . Then U is n -closed and n C l ( A ) n C l ( U ) = U . Hence, every subset of X is m n - g -closed and every subset of X is m n - g -open. If B is an m-closed set not containing x , then { x } and B are the required disjoint m n - g -open sets containing x and B , respectively. Therefore, X is m n g -regular.□

An ideal topological space ( X , τ , ) is said to be g - r e g u l a r [20] if for each closed set A and each point x A , there exist disjoint g -open sets U , V such that x U and A V . By Theorem 3.6, we obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 3.8

[20] An ideal topological space ( X , τ , ) is g -regular if and only if for any open set V containing any x X , there exists an g -open set U such that x U Cl ( U ) V .

Definition 3.9

Let ( X , m ) be an m-space and A be a subset of X .

  1. A is said to be m g - c l o s e d [21] if m Cl ( A ) U whenever A U and U m . The complement of an m g -closed set is said to be m g -open.

  2. X is m g - r e g u l a r if for each m-closed set A and each point x A , there exist disjoint m g -open sets U , V such that x U and A V .

If = { } , then by Remark 2.8, A m H = m C l ( A ) . Therefore, put m = n , then by Theorem 3.6, we obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 3.10

For an m-space ( X , m ) , the following properties are equivalent:

  1. X is m g -regular.

  2. For any m-open set U containing x X , there exists an m g -open set V such that x V m C l ( V ) U .

  3. For any m-closed set A , the intersection of all m g -closed neighborhoods of A is A .

  4. For any set A and any m-open set B such that A B , there exists an m g -open set U such that A U and m C l ( U ) B .

  5. For any nonempty set A and any m-closed set B such that A B = , there exist disjoint m g -open sets U , V such that A U and B V .

A topological space ( X , τ ) is said to be g-regular if for each closed set A and each point x A , there exist disjoint g -open sets U , V such that x U and A V . In Corollary 3.10, put m = τ (topology), then we obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 3.11

For a topological space ( X , τ ) , the following properties are equivalent:

  1. X is g -regular.

  2. For any open set U containing x X , there exists a g-open set V such that x V C l ( V ) U .

  3. For any closed set A , the intersection of all g-closed neighborhoods of A is A .

  4. For any set A and any open set B such that A B , there exists a g -open set U such that A U and C l ( U ) B .

  5. For any nonempty set A and any closed set B such that A B = , there exist disjoint g -open sets U , V such that A U and B V .

Definition 3.12

A hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) is said to be ( m , n ) - g - r e g u l a r if for each m n - g -closed set A and each point x A , there exist disjoint n -open sets U , V such that x U and A V .

Theorem 3.13

For a hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) , the following properties are equivalent:

  1. X is ( m , n ) - g -regular.

  2. For any m n - g -open set U containing x X , there exists an n -open set V such that x V n Cl ( V ) U .

  3. For any m n - g -closed set A , the intersection of all n -closed neighborhoods of A is A .

  4. For any set A and any m n - g -open set B such that A B , there exists an n -open set U such that A U and n Cl ( U ) B .

  5. For any nonempty set A and any m n - g -closed set B such that A B = , there exist disjoint n -open sets U , V such that A U and B V .

Proof

(1) (2): Let U be an m n - g -open set such that x U . Then X U is an m n - g -closed set not containing x . By hypothesis, there exist disjoint n -open sets V , W such that x V and X U W . Hence, X W U , V W = and so V X W . Thus, x V n Cl ( V ) n Cl ( X W ) = X W U .

(2) (3): Let A be any m n - g -closed set and x A . Then X A is an m n - g -open set containing x . By hypothesis, there exists an n -open set V such that x V n Cl ( V ) X A . Thus, A X n Cl ( V ) X V . Since X n Cl ( V ) is n H -open, then X V is an n -closed neighborhood of A and x X V . This shows that A is the intersection of all the n -closed neighborhoods of A .

(3) (4): Let A be any set and B be any m n - g -open set such that A B . Let x A B . Then, X B is m n - g -closed and x X B . By hypothesis, there exists an n -closed neighborhood V of X B such that x V . Let X B G V , where G is n H -open. Then U = X V is an n H -open set such that x U and A U . Furthermore, X G is n -closed and n Cl ( U ) = n Cl ( X V ) n Cl ( X G ) B .

(4) (5): Let A be any nonempty set and B be any m n - g -closed set such that A B = . Then X B is an m n - g -open set and A ( X B ) . By hypothesis, there exists an n -open set U such that A U and U n Cl ( U ) X B . Let V = X n Cl ( U ) . Then U and V are disjoint n -open sets such that B X n Cl ( U ) = V .

(5) (1): Let B be an m n - g -closed set and x B . Put A = { x } . Then, there exist disjoint n -open sets U , V such that A U and B V , hence x U . Thus, X is ( m , n ) - g –regular.□

An m-space ( X , m ) is said to be m 0 -regular if for each m g -closed set A and each point x A , there exist disjoint m 0 -open sets U , V such that x U and A V . If = { } , then by Remark 2.8 A m H = m C l ( A ) . Therefore, put m = n , then by Theorem 3.13 we obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 3.14

For an m-space ( X , m ) , the following properties are equivalent:

  1. X is m 0 -regular.

  2. For any m g -open set U containing x X , there exists an m 0 -open set V such that x V m C l ( V ) U .

  3. For any m g -closed set A , the intersection of all m 0 -closed neighborhoods of A is A .

  4. For any set A and any m g -open set B such that A B , there exists an m 0 -open set U such that A U and m C l ( U ) B .

  5. For any nonempty set A and any m g -closed set B such that A B = , there exist disjoint m 0 -open sets U , V such that A U and B V .

A topological space ( X , τ ) is said to be g-regular (in the sense of Munshi [6]) if for each g -closed set A and each point x A , there exist disjoint open sets U , V such that x U and A V . In Corollary 3.14, put m = τ (topology), then, m 0 = τ and we obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 3.15

For a topological space ( X , τ ) , the following properties are equivalent:

  1. X is g -regular (in the sense of Munshi).

  2. For any g -open set U containing x X , there exists an open set V such that x V C l ( V ) U .

  3. For any g -closed set A , the intersection of all closed neighborhoods of A is A.

  4. For any set A and any g -open set B such that A B , there exists an open set U such that A U and C l ( U ) B .

  5. For any nonempty set A and any g -closed set B such that A B = , there exist disjoint open sets U , V such that A U and B V .

4 Normality in a hereditary bi m-space

Definition 4.1

A hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) is said to be ( m , n ) - g -normal if for every pair of disjoint m-closed sets A and B in X , there exist disjoint n -open sets U and V such that A U and B V .

Theorem 4.2

For a hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) , the following properties are equivalent:

  1. X is ( m , n ) - g -normal.

  2. For any disjoint m-closed sets A and B , there exist disjoint m n - g -open sets U , V such that A U and B V .

  3. For any m-closed set A and any m-open set U containing A , there exists an m n - g -open set G such that A G n Cl ( G ) U .

  4. For any m-closed set A and any m-open set U containing A , there exists an n -open set G such that A G n Cl ( G ) U .

  5. For any disjoint m-closed sets A and B , there exists an m n - g -open set V such that A V and n Cl ( V ) B = .

  6. For any disjoint m-closed sets A and B , there exists an n -open set G such that A G and n Cl ( G ) B = .

Proof

(1) (2): The proof follows from the fact that every n H -open set is m n - g -open.

(2) (3): Let A be any m-closed set and U any m-open set such that A U . Then, A and X U are disjoint m-closed sets. By hypothesis, there exist disjoint m n - g -open sets G , V such that A G and X U V . Thus, G X V U and since X V is an m n - g -closed set, then A G n Cl ( G ) n Cl ( X V ) U .

(3) (4): Let A be any m-closed set and U be any m-open set such that A U . By hypothesis, there exists an m n - g -open set V such that A V n Cl ( V ) U . By Lemma 3.3, A n Int ( V ) . Let G = n Int ( V ) . Then G is an n -open set and we have A G n Cl ( G ) n Cl ( V ) U .

(4) (5): Let A and B be any disjoint m-closed sets. Then, X B is an m-open set such that A X B and by hypothesis, there exists an n -open set V such that A V n Cl ( V ) X B . Thus, V is m n - g -open, A V and n Cl ( V ) B = .

(5) (6): Let A , B be any disjoint m-closed sets. By hypothesis, there exists an m n - g -open set V such that A V and n Cl ( V ) B = . By Lemma 3.3, A n Int ( V ) . Put G = n Int ( V ) . Then, G is an n -open set and we have A G and n Cl ( G ) B = .

(6) (1): Let A , B be any disjoint m-closed sets. By hypothesis, there exists an n -open set G such that A G and n Cl ( G ) B = . If we take U = G and V = X n Cl ( G ) . Then U and V are disjoint n -open sets such that A U and B V . This proves that X is ( m , n ) - g -normal.□

If = { } , then by Remark 2.8, A n H = n Cl ( A ) and we obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 4.3

Let ( X , m , n ) be a bi m-space and n have property . Then, for the bi m-space ( X , m , n ) , the following properties are equivalent:

  1. ( X , m , n ) is ( m , n ) -normal;

  2. For any disjoint m-closed sets F 1 , F 2 , there exist m n g -open sets V 1 , V 2 such that F 1 V 1 , F 2 V 2 and V 1 V 2 = ;

  3. For any m-closed set F and any m-open set U containing F, there exists an m n g -open set V such that F V n Cl ( V ) U ;

  4. For any m-closed set F and any m-open set U containing F, there exists an n-open set G such that F G n Cl ( G ) U ;

  5. For any disjoint m-closed sets F 1 , F 2 , there exists an m n g -open set V such that F 1 V and n Cl ( V ) F 2 = ;

  6. For any disjoint m-closed sets F 1 , F 2 , there exists an n -open set G such that F 1 G and n Cl ( G ) F 2 = .

Definition 4.4

[20] An ideal topological space ( X , τ , ) is said to be g - n o r m a l if for every pair of disjoint closed sets A and B in X , there exist disjoint g -open sets U , V such that A U and B V .

Let m = n = τ , = , then by Theorem 4.2, we obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 4.5

[20] For an ideal topological space ( X , τ , ) , the following properties are equivalent:

  1. ( X , τ , ) is g -normal.

  2. For any disjoint closed sets A and B , there exist disjoint τ -open sets U , V such that A U and B V .

  3. For any closed set A and any open set U containing A , there exists an g -open set G such that A G C l ( G ) U .

  4. For any closed set A and any open set U containing A, there exists an τ -open set G such that A G C l ( G ) U .

  5. For any disjoint closed sets A and B , there exists an g -open set V such that A V and C l ( V ) B = .

  6. For any disjoint closed sets A and B, there exists an τ -open set G such that A G and C l ( G ) B = .

A minimal space ( X , m ) is said to be m 0 - n o r m a l if for every pair of disjoint m-closed sets A and B in X , there exist disjoint m 0 -open sets U , V such that A U and B V . If = { } , A H = m C l ( A ) . Therefore, put m = n then by Theorem 4.2 we obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 4.6

For an m-space ( X , m ) , the following properties are equivalent:

  1. X is m 0 -normal.

  2. For any disjoint m-closed sets A and B, there exist disjoint m g -open sets U , V such that A U and B V .

  3. For any m-closed set A and any m-open set U containing A, there exists an mg-open set G such that A G m C l ( G ) U .

  4. For any m-closed set A and any m-open set U containing A, there exists an m 0 -open set G such that A G m C l ( G ) U .

  5. For any disjoint m-closed sets A and B, there exists an mg-open set V such that A V and m C l ( V ) B = .

  6. For any disjoint m-closed sets A and B , there exists an m 0 -open set G such that A G and m C l ( G ) B = .

In Corollary 4.6, put m = τ (topology), then we obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 4.7

For a topological space ( X , τ ) , the following properties are equivalent:

  1. X is normal.

  2. For any disjoint closed sets A and B , there exist disjoint g -open sets U , V such that A U and B V .

  3. For any closed set A and any open set U containing A , there exists a g -open set G such that A G C l ( G ) U .

  4. For any closed set A and any open set U containing A, there exists an open set G such that A G C l ( G ) U .

  5. For any disjoint closed sets A and B , there exists a g -open set V such that A V and C l ( V ) B = .

  6. For any disjoint closed sets A and B, there exists an open set G such that A G and C l ( G ) B = .

Corollary 4.8

Let ( X , m , n , ) be a hereditary bi m-space which is ( m , n ) - g -normal and m have property . If F is m-closed and A is an m g -closed set such that A F = , then there exist disjoint m n - g -open sets U and V such that A U and F V .

Proof

Since A F = , A X F where X F is m-open. Therefore, by hypothesis, m C l ( A ) X F . Since m C l ( A ) F = and X is ( m , n ) - -normal, by Theorem 4.2 (2), there exist disjoint m n - g -open sets U , V such that A U and F V .□

Theorem 4.9

Let ( X , m , n , ) be a hereditary bi m-space which is ( m , n ) - g -normal and m have property . Then the following hold.

  1. For every m-closed set A and every mg-open set B containing A , there exists an m n - g -open set U such that A n Int H ( U ) U B .

  2. For every m g -closed set A and every m-open set B containing A , there exists an m n - g -closed set U such that A U n Cl H ( U ) B .

Proof

  1. Let A be an m-closed set and B be an m g -open set containing A . Then A ( X B ) = , where A is m-closed and X B is m g -closed. By Corollary 4.8, there exist disjoint m n - g -open sets U , V such that A U and X B V . Since U V = , we have U X V . By Lemma 3.3, A n Int ( U ) . Therefore, A n Int ( U ) U B .

  2. Let A be an m g -closed set and B be an m-open set containing A . Then X B is an m-closed set contained in the m g -open set X A . By (1), there exists an m n - g -open set V such that X B n Int ( V ) V X A . Therefore, A X V n Cl ( X V ) B . Let U = X V , then A U n Cl ( U ) B and U is m n - g -closed.□

Definition 4.10

A hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) is said to be ( m , n ) - g - n o r m a l if for every pair of disjoint m n - g -closed sets A and B in X , there exist disjoint n H -open sets U , V such that A U and B V .

Theorem 4.11

For a hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) , the following properties are equivalent:

  1. X is ( m , n ) - g -normal.

  2. For any m n - g -closed set A and any m n - g -open set U containing A , there exists an n -open set V such that A V n Cl ( V ) U .

  3. For any pair of disjoint m n - g -closed sets A and B of X , there exists an n -open set V containing A such that n Cl ( V ) B = .

  4. For any pair of disjoint m n - g -closed sets A and B of X , there exist n -open sets U and V such that A U , B V and n Cl ( U ) n Cl ( V ) = .

Proof

(1) (2): Let A be any m n - g -closed set and U be any m n - g -open set such that A U . Then, A and X U are disjoint m n - g -closed sets. By hypothesis, there exist disjoint n -open sets V and W such that A V and X U W . Since V W = , then n Cl ( V ) X W . Thus, A V n Cl ( V ) X W U .

(2) (3): Let A , B be any disjoint m n - g -closed sets. Then, X B is an m n - g -open set such that A X B and by hypothesis, there exists an n -open set V such that A V n Cl ( V ) X B . Therefore, V is an n -open set such that A V and n Cl ( V ) B = .

(3) (4): Let A , B be any disjoint m n - g -closed sets. By hypothesis, there exists an n H -open set V such that A V and n Cl ( V ) B = . Since n Cl ( V ) and B are disjoint m n - g -closed sets, then again by hypothesis, there exists an n -open set U containing B such that n Cl ( U ) n Cl ( V ) = .

(4) (1): Let A , B be any disjoint m n - g -closed sets. By hypothesis, there exist n H -open sets U and V such that A U , B V and n Cl ( U ) n Cl ( V ) = . Clearly, U V = . This proves that X is ( m , n ) - g -normal.□

Definition 4.12

A minimal space ( X , m ) is said to be m g - n o r m a l if for every pair of disjoint m g -closed sets A and B in X , there exist disjoint m 0 -open sets U , V such that A U and B V .

If = { } , then A H = m C l ( A ) . Therefore, put m = n , then by Theorem 4.11 we obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 4.13

For an m-space ( X , m ) , the following properties are equivalent:

  1. X is m g -normal.

  2. For any m g -closed set A and any mg-open set U containing A, there exists an m 0 -open set V such that A V m C l ( V ) U .

  3. For any pair of disjoint mg-closed sets A and B of X, there exists an m 0 -open set V containing A such that m C l ( V ) B = .

  4. For any pair of disjoint m g -closed sets A and B of X , there exist m 0 -open sets U and V such that A U , B V and m C l ( U ) m C l ( V ) = .

Definition 4.14

[6] A topological space ( X , τ ) is said to be g - n o r m a l (in the sense of Munshi) if for every pair of disjoint g -closed sets A and B in X , there exist disjoint open sets U , V such that A U and B V .

In Corollary 4.13, put m = τ (topology), then we obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 4.15

[20,22] For a topological space ( X , τ ) , the following properties are equivalent:

  1. X is g-normal.

  2. For any g -closed set A and any g-open set U containing A, there exists an open set V such that A V C l ( V ) U .

  3. For any pair of disjoint g-closed sets A and B of X, there exists an open set V containing A such that C l ( V ) B = .

  4. For any pair of disjoint g-closed sets A and B of X, there exist open sets U and V such that A U , B V , and C l ( U ) C l ( V ) = .

Remark 4.16

By the following examples, we show that

  1. ( m , n ) - g -regular and ( m , n ) - g -regular are independent,

  2. ( m , n ) - g -normal and (m, n)- g -normal are independent,

  3. ( m , n ) - g -regular and ( m , n ) - g -normal are independent.

Example 4.17

Let X = { a , b , c , d } , m = { , X } , n = { , X , { a } , { c } } and = { , { b } , { d } , { b , d } } . Then, we have

  1. m c = { , X } .

  2. n c = { , X , { b , c , d } , { a , b , d } } .

  3. n -closed sets = { , X , { b , c , d } , { a , b , d } , { b } , { d } , { b , d } } .

  4. n -open sets = { , X , { a } , { c } , { a , c , d } , { a , b , c } , { a , c } } .

  5. The family of m n - g -closed sets is the power set of X .

It is clear that a hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) is ( m , n ) - g -regular and ( m , n ) - g -normal but not ( m , n ) - g -regular and not ( m , n ) - g -normal.

Example 4.18

Let X = { a , b , c , d } , m = { , X , { a , c } } , n = { , X , { a } , { c } } and = { , { b } , { d } , { b , d } } . Then, we have

  1. m c = { , X , { b , d } } .

  2. n c = { , X , { b , c , d } , { a , b , d } } .

  3. n -closed sets = { , X , { b , c , d } , { a , b , d } , { b } , { d } , { b , d } } .

  4. n -open sets = { , X , { a } , { c } , { a , c , d } , { a , b , c } , { a , c } } .

  5. m n - g -closed sets = { , X , { b , c , d } , { a , b , d } , { b } , { d } , { b , d } , { a , b } , { a , d } , { b , c } , { c , d } , { a , c , d } , { a , b , c } } .

It is clear that a hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) is ( m , n ) - g -normal but not ( m , n ) - g -regular and not ( m , n ) - g -regular and not ( m , n ) - g -normal.

Example 4.19

Let X = { a , b , c } , m = { , X , { a } , { c } } , n = { , X , { a } , { b } , { c } } and = { , { b } } . Then we have

  1. m c = { , X , { b , c } , { a , b } } .

  2. n c = { , X , { b , c } , { a , b } , { a , c } } .

  3. The family of n -closed sets is the power set of X .

  4. The family of m n - g -closed sets is the power set of X .

It is clear that a hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) is ( m , n ) - g -regular and ( m , n ) - g -regular and ( m , n ) - g -normal and ( m , n ) - g -normal.

Example 4.20

Let X = { a , b , c } , m = { , X , { a , b } , { a , c } , { b , c } } , n = { , X } and = { , { b } } . Then we have

  1. m c = { , X , { a } , { b } , { c } } .

  2. n c = { , X } .

  3. n -closed sets = { , X , { b } } .

  4. m n - g -closed sets = { , X , { b } } .

It is clear that a hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) is ( m , n ) - g -normal but not ( m , n ) - g -regular and not ( m , n ) - g -regular and not ( m , n ) - g -normal.

Example 4.21

Let X = { a , b , c } , m = { , X , { a , b } , { a , c } , { b , c } } , n = { , X } and = { } . Then we have

  1. m c = { , X , { a } , { b } , { c } } .

  2. n c = { , X } .

  3. n -closed sets = { , X } .

  4. m n - g -closed sets = { , X } .

It is clear that a hereditary bi m-space ( X , m , n , ) is ( m , n ) - g -regular and ( m , n ) - g -normal but not ( m , n ) - g -regular and ( m , n ) - g -normal.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the referees for useful comments and suggestions. Particularly, Examples 4.17–4.21 are improved by suggestions of the referee.

  1. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  2. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  3. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

[1] V. Popa and T. Noiri, On M-continuous functions, An. Univ. Dunarea de Jos Galati, Ser. Mat. Fiz. Mec. Teor. (2) 43(23) (2000), 31–41. Search in Google Scholar

[2] O. B. Ozbakir and E. D. Yildirim, On some closed sets in ideal minimal spaces, Acta Math. Hungar. 125 (2009), 227–235, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10474-009-8240-9. Search in Google Scholar

[3] T. Noiri and V. Popa, Generalizations of closed sets in minimal spaces with hereditary classes, Anal. Univ. Sci. Budapest 61 (2018), 69–83. Search in Google Scholar

[4] T. Noiri, The further unified theory for modifications of g-closed sets, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 57 (2008), 411–421, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12215-008-0030-7. Search in Google Scholar

[5] T. Noiri and V. Popa, Closed sets in hereditary bi m-spaces, Questions Answers General Topol. 38 (2020), 133–142. Search in Google Scholar

[6] B. M. Munshi, Separation axioms, Acta Ciencia Indica 12 (1986), 140–144. Search in Google Scholar

[7] J. Sanabria, E. Rosas, and C. Carpintero, On regularity and normality via ideal minimal generalized closed sets, J. Adv. Res. Pure Math. 5 (2013), no. 2, 46–58. 10.5373/jarpm.1351.030912Search in Google Scholar

[8] J. Sanabria, E. Rosas, C. Carpintero, and M. Salas-Brown, On the further unified theory of ideal generalized closed sets, J. Adv. Math. Stud. 4 (2011), no. 2, 83–96. Search in Google Scholar

[9] A. Al-Omari and T. Noiri, Generalizations of Lindelöf spaces via hereditary classes, Acta Univ. Sapientie Math. 13 (2021), no. 1, 281–291, https://doi.org/10.2478/ausm-2021-0017. Search in Google Scholar

[10] A. Al-Omari and T. Noiri, Generalizations of regular and normal spaces II, Mathematica 63(86) (2021), no. 1, 3–12, https://doi.org/10.24193/mathcluj.2021.1.01. Search in Google Scholar

[11] C. Carpintero, E. Rosas, M. Salas-Brown, I. Blanco, and M. Polo, Remarks on notions of μ∗-open sets, Creat. Math. Inform. 23 (2014), no. 1, 51–55, https://doi.org/10.37193/CMI.2014.01.13. Search in Google Scholar

[12] C. Carpintero, E. Rosas, M. Salas-Brown, and J. Sanabria, μ-Compactness with respect to a hereditary class, Bol. Soc. Paran. Mat. 34 (2016), no. 2, 231–236, https://doi.org/10.5269/bspm.v34i2.27177. Search in Google Scholar

[13] T. Noiri, A. Al-Omari, and M. S. M. Noorani, Weak forms of open and closed functions via b-θ-open sets, Demonstr. Math. 42 (2009), no. 1, 193–204, https://doi.org/10.1515/dema-2009-0118. Search in Google Scholar

[14] T. Noiri and V. Popa, Between ∗-closed and ℐg-closed sets in ideal topological spaces, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 59 (2010), no. 2, 251–260, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12215-010-0018-y. Search in Google Scholar

[15] H. Maki, K. C. Rao, and A. Nagoor Gani, On generalizing semi-open and preopen sets, Pure Appl. Math. Sci. 49 (1999), 17–29. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Á. Császár, Modification of generalized topologies via hereditary classes, Acta Math. Hungar. 115 (2007), no. 1–2, 29–36, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10474-006-0531-9. Search in Google Scholar

[17] D. Janković and T. R. Hamlett, New topologies from old via ideals, Amer. Math. Monthly 97 (1990), no. 4, 295–310, https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1990.11995593. Search in Google Scholar

[18] J. Dontchev, M. Ganster, and T. Noiri, Unified operators approach of generalized closed sets via topological ideals, Math. Japan. 49 (1999), 395–401. Search in Google Scholar

[19] N. Levine, Generalized closed sets in topology, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 19 (1970), 89–96, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02843888. 10.1007/BF02843888Search in Google Scholar

[20] M. Navaneethakrishnan, J. PaulrajJoseph, and D. Sivaraj, ℐg-normal and ℐg-regular spaces, Acta Math. Hungar. 125 (2009), no. 4, 327–340, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10474-009-9027-8. Search in Google Scholar

[21] T. Noiri, A unified theory for modifications of g-closed sets, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 56 (2007), 171–184, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031437. Search in Google Scholar

[22] T. Noiri and V. Popa, On g-regular spaces and some functions, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kochi Univ. Ser. A. Math. 20 (1999), 67–74. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-01-13
Revised: 2022-05-11
Accepted: 2022-05-13
Published Online: 2022-06-18

© 2022 Ahmad Al-Omari et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. On some summation formulas
  3. A study of a meromorphic perturbation of the sine family
  4. Asymptotic behavior of even-order noncanonical neutral differential equations
  5. Unconditionally positive NSFD and classical finite difference schemes for biofilm formation on medical implant using Allen-Cahn equation
  6. Starlike and convexity properties of q-Bessel-Struve functions
  7. Mathematical modeling and optimal control of the impact of rumors on the banking crisis
  8. On linear chaos in function spaces
  9. Convergence of generalized sampling series in weighted spaces
  10. Persistence landscapes of affine fractals
  11. Inertial iterative method with self-adaptive step size for finite family of split monotone variational inclusion and fixed point problems in Banach spaces
  12. Various notions of module amenability on weighted semigroup algebras
  13. Regularity and normality in hereditary bi m-spaces
  14. On a first-order differential system with initial and nonlocal boundary conditions
  15. On solving pseudomonotone equilibrium problems via two new extragradient-type methods under convex constraints
  16. Local linear approach: Conditional density estimate for functional and censored data
  17. Some properties of graded generalized 2-absorbing submodules
  18. Eigenvalue inclusion sets for linear response eigenvalue problems
  19. Some integral inequalities for generalized left and right log convex interval-valued functions based upon the pseudo-order relation
  20. More properties of generalized open sets in generalized topological spaces
  21. An extragradient inertial algorithm for solving split fixed-point problems of demicontractive mappings, with equilibrium and variational inequality problems
  22. An accurate and efficient local one-dimensional method for the 3D acoustic wave equation
  23. On a weighted elliptic equation of N-Kirchhoff type with double exponential growth
  24. On split feasibility problem for finite families of equilibrium and fixed point problems in Banach spaces
  25. Entire and meromorphic solutions for systems of the differential difference equations
  26. Multiplication operators on the Banach algebra of bounded Φ-variation functions on compact subsets of ℂ
  27. Mannheim curves and their partner curves in Minkowski 3-space E13
  28. Characterizations of the group invertibility of a matrix revisited
  29. Iterates of q-Bernstein operators on triangular domain with all curved sides
  30. Data analysis-based time series forecast for managing household electricity consumption
  31. A robust study of the transmission dynamics of zoonotic infection through non-integer derivative
  32. A Dai-Liao-type projection method for monotone nonlinear equations and signal processing
  33. Review Article
  34. Remarks on some variants of minimal point theorem and Ekeland variational principle with applications
  35. Special Issue on Recent Methods in Approximation Theory - Part I
  36. Coupled fixed point theorems under new coupled implicit relation in Hilbert spaces
  37. Approximation of integrable functions by general linear matrix operators of their Fourier series
  38. Sharp sufficient condition for the convergence of greedy expansions with errors in coefficient computation
  39. Approximation of conic sections by weighted Lupaş post-quantum Bézier curves
  40. On the generalized growth and approximation of entire solutions of certain elliptic partial differential equation
  41. Existence results for ABC-fractional BVP via new fixed point results of F-Lipschitzian mappings
  42. Linear barycentric rational collocation method for solving biharmonic equation
  43. A note on the convergence of Phillips operators by the sequence of functions via q-calculus
  44. Taylor’s series expansions for real powers of two functions containing squares of inverse cosine function, closed-form formula for specific partial Bell polynomials, and series representations for real powers of Pi
  45. Special Issue on Recent Advances in Fractional Calculus and Nonlinear Fractional Evaluation Equations - Part I
  46. Positive solutions for fractional differential equation at resonance under integral boundary conditions
  47. Source term model for elasticity system with nonlinear dissipative term in a thin domain
  48. A numerical study of anomalous electro-diffusion cells in cable sense with a non-singular kernel
  49. On Opial-type inequality for a generalized fractional integral operator
  50. Special Issue on Advances in Integral Transforms and Analysis of Differential Equations with Applications
  51. Mathematical analysis of a MERS-Cov coronavirus model
  52. Rapid exponential stabilization of nonlinear continuous systems via event-triggered impulsive control
  53. Novel soliton solutions for the fractional three-wave resonant interaction equations
  54. The multistep Laplace optimized decomposition method for solving fractional-order coronavirus disease model (COVID-19) via the Caputo fractional approach
  55. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear Analysis
  56. Some recent results on singular p-Laplacian equations
  57. Infinitely many solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equations with sign-changing nonlinearity without the aid of 4-superlinear at infinity
  58. Special Issue on Recent Advances for Computational and Mathematical Methods in Scientific Problems
  59. Existence of solutions for a nonlinear problem at resonance
  60. Asymptotic stability of solutions for a diffusive epidemic model
  61. Special Issue on Computational and Numerical Methods for Special Functions - Part I
  62. Fully degenerate Bernoulli numbers and polynomials
  63. Wigner-Ville distribution and ambiguity function associated with the quaternion offset linear canonical transform
  64. Some identities related to degenerate Stirling numbers of the second kind
  65. Two identities and closed-form formulas for the Bernoulli numbers in terms of central factorial numbers of the second kind
  66. λ-q-Sheffer sequence and its applications
  67. Special Issue on Fixed Point Theory and Applications to Various Differential/Integral Equations - Part I
  68. General decay for a nonlinear pseudo-parabolic equation with viscoelastic term
  69. Generalized common fixed point theorem for generalized hybrid mappings in Hilbert spaces
  70. Computation of solution of integral equations via fixed point results
  71. Characterizations of quasi-metric and G-metric completeness involving w-distances and fixed points
  72. Notes on continuity result for conformable diffusion equation on the sphere: The linear case
Downloaded on 25.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dema-2022-0021/html
Scroll to top button