References

Atkinson, J. M. & P. Drew. 1979. Order in court: The organization of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-04057-5Search in Google Scholar

Bail, C. A. 2012. The fringe effect: Civil society organizations and the evolution of media discourse about Islam since the September 11th attacks. American Sociological Review 77(6). 855–879.10.1177/0003122412465743Search in Google Scholar

Bargiela-Chiappini, F. 2009. The handbook of business discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748631834Search in Google Scholar

Benneworth, K. 2009. Police interviews with suspected paedophiles: A discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 20(5). 555–569.10.1177/0957926509106410Search in Google Scholar

Bergmann, J. R. 1992. Veiled morality: Notes on discretion in psychiatry. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 137–162. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bielick, Bernhard. 2008. Phatic talk in learner – native speaker interaction. In R. Geluykens & B. Kraft (eds.), Institutional discourse in cross-cultural contexts, 87–104. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Candlin, C. N. 1997. General editor’s preface. In B. L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell & B. Norberg (eds.), The construction of professional discourse, vii–xiv. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Cotterill, J. 2001. Domestic discord, rocky relationships: Semantic prosodies in representations of marital violence in the O. J. Simpson trial. Discourse & Society 12(3). 291–312.10.1177/0957926501012003002Search in Google Scholar

Coulthard, M. & A. Johnson. 2007. An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203969717Search in Google Scholar

Drew, P. 1992. Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 471–520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Drew, P. & J. Heritage (eds.). 1992. Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dumitrescu, D. 1996. Rhetorical vs. nonrhetorical allo-repetition: The case of Romanian interrogatives. Journal of Pragmatics 26: 321–354.10.1016/0378-2166(95)00052-6Search in Google Scholar

Eades, Diana. 2008. Courtroom discourse and neocolonial control. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110208320Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. 2015. Language and power, 3rd edn. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Freidson, E. 1970. Profession of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. New York: Dodd Mead.Search in Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Geluykens, R. & B. Kraft. 2008. The cross-cultural dimension of institutional discourse. In R. Geluykens & B. Kraft (eds.), Institutional discourse in cross-cultural contexts, 3–27. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Geluykens, Ronald. 2008. Requesting in native and non-native business letters. In R. Geluykens & B. Kraft (eds.), Institutional discourse in cross-cultural contexts, 169–192. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, E. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Search in Google Scholar

Goodrich, P. 1987. Legal discourse: Studies in linguistics, rhetoric and legal analysis. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-11283-8Search in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1984. The theory of communicative action, volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, S. 1988. Court discourse as genre. In R. P. Fawcett & D. J. Young (eds.), New developments in systemic linguistics, vol. 2: Theory and application, 94–115. London: Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

Have, P. 1991. Talk and Institution: A reconsideration of the “asymmetry” of doctor-patient interaction. In D. Boden & D. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, 138–163. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haworth, K. 2006. The dynamics of power and resistance in police interview discourse. Discourse & Society 17(6). 739–759.10.1177/0957926506068430Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, J. 1998. Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analyzing distinctive turn-taking systems. In S. Cmejrková, J. Hoffmannová, O. Müllerová & J. Svetlá (eds.), Proceedings of the sixth International Congress of IADA (International Association for Dialog Analysis), 3–17. Tubingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110965049-001Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, J. & S. Clayman. 2010. Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444318135Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, J. & D. Greatbatch. 1991. On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In D. Boden & D. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, 93–137. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ingram, J. & V. Elliott. 2014. Turn taking and “wait time” in classroom interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 62. 1–12.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.12.002Search in Google Scholar

Kapellidi, C. 2013. The organization of talk in school interaction. Discourse Studies 15(2). 185–204.10.1177/1461445612471466Search in Google Scholar

Koester, A. 2010. Workplace discourse. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. 1992. Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 60–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, V. & A. Miller. 2011. “Institutional talk” in the discourse between an educational psychologist and a parent: A single case study employing mixed research methods. Educational psychology in Practice 27(3). 195–212.10.1080/02667363.2011.603529Search in Google Scholar

Matheson, D. 2005. Media discourses: Analyzing media texts. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maynard, D. 1991. Interaction and asymmetry in clinical discourse. American Journal of Sociology 97(2). 448–495.10.1086/229785Search in Google Scholar

Maynard, D. 1992. On clinicians co-implicating recipients’ perspective in the delivery of diagnostic news. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 331–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maynard, D & P. L. Hudak. 2008. Small talk, high stakes: Interactional disattentiveness in the context of prosocial doctor–patient interaction. Language in Society 37. 661–688.10.1017/S0047404508080986Search in Google Scholar

Mayr, A. 2004. Prison discourse: Language as a means of control and resistance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230511965Search in Google Scholar

Mumby, D. & R. Clair. 1997. Organizational discourse. In T. A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Structure and process: Discourse studies, vol. 2, 181–205. London: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Myers, G. 2005. Applied linguistics and institutions of opinion. Applied Linguistics 26(4). 527–544.10.1093/applin/ami025Search in Google Scholar

O’Keeffe, A. 2006. Investigating media discourse. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203015704Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1967. Manuscripts in the Houghton Library of Harvard University, as identified by Richard Robin, Annotated catalogue of the papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. [Reference to Peirce’s manuscripts will be designated MS].Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1977. Semiotic and significs: The correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby, C. S. Hardwick (ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Renkema, J. 2004. Introduction to discourse studies. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.124Search in Google Scholar

Sarangi, S. & C. Roberts. 1999. Talk, work, and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation, and management settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110208375Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208Search in Google Scholar

Simpson, P. & A. Mayr. 2010. Language and power: A resource book for students. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Thornborrow, J. 2002. Power talk: Language and interaction in institutional discourse. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, T. A. 1993. Discourse, power, and access. In C. R. Caldas & R. Coulthard (eds.), Text and practices: Studies in critical discourse analysis, 84–104. London: Hutchinson.Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, T. A. 2008. Discourse and power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-07299-3Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, A. & L. Cheng. 2011. Exploring courtroom discourse: The language of power and control. Farnham, England & Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Ye, N., J. Pang & J. Li. 2014. A sociosemiotic interpretation of police interrogations. Semiotica 201(1/4). 269–280.10.1515/sem-2014-0027Search in Google Scholar

Zimmerman, D. 1992. The interactional organization of calls for emergency. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 418–469. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar