Home WiFi Electromagnetic Field Modelling for Indoor Localization
Article Open Access

WiFi Electromagnetic Field Modelling for Indoor Localization

  • Piotr Lipinski EMAIL logo and Marcin Leplawy
Published/Copyright: August 14, 2019

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to develop simplified model for WiFi electromagnetic field propagation. The model can be used in preliminary estimation of WiFi transmitter localization for the purpose of WiFi-based indoor localization. It can be particularly useful when designing structural networks.We have developed a simplified linear model of WiFi electromagnetic field modelling and compared it with the most commonly used, more sophisticated models and with measurement results which were carried out in the laboratory. As demonstrated by the results of measurements conducted using various hardware, the accuracy of this simplified model introduced is similar to the commonly used models, but the number of parameters is lower. Therefore, our model easier to implement in real life conditions. The model presented in this paper enables WiFi electromagnetic field modelling when the exact values of propagation parameters and transmitter characteristics is unknown. This is usually the case at the early stage of structural network design,when exact parameters of building construction materials are not known. As the model is very simple, it does not require much effort to deploy, while its accuracy is sufficient for preliminary WiFi transmitter localization. Simplified models of WiFi electromagnetic field propagation are known, but no comparative research combined with measurements has been done in this field. This paper provides a comparison of different electromagnetic field models which can be applied to WiFi electromagnetic field propagation together with measurement results.

1 Introduction

WiFi is a technology for wireless local area networking which bases on the IEEE 802.11 standards. It most commonly uses the 2.4 GHz, 3.6 GHz, 5.8 GHz, 60 GHz and 900 GHz radio frequencies, see (IEEE 802.11,Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications IEEE, 2007.). Frequency assignments and operational limitations are different worldwide. Australia and Europe allow for two channels beyond the eleven permitted in the United States for the 2.4 GHz band. In Japan an extra three more channels are available. Nevertheless in most countries for IEEE 802.11b/g/n standards the wave frequency do not exceed 2.4 GHz – 2.5 GHz range. For 802.11a/h/j/n/ac/ax, the range 5.15 GHz – 5.725 GHz is used, for 802.11ad/ay the range 57.24 GHz - 70.2 GHz is used and for 802.11ah 863 GHz – 868 GHz is used in Europe, see (IEEE 802. Annex J modified by amendments k, y and n, 2007).WiFi and other wireless standards are nowadays used in a majority of public buildings, see Peulic et al. (2007) [1]. A WiFi emitter uses an antenna to propagate a wireless electromagnetic signal according to antenna characteristics Jevtić and Ničković (2011) [2]. The strength of this signal can be measured by using a WiFi receiver for indoor localization, see for example Chen (2008) [3], Connolly (2008) [4]. The strength of the signal depends on the following parameters: power of the source, antennas’ characteristics, distance from the source of the signal, magnetic permeability, permittivity and refraction according to Kong et al. (2011) [5]. Very accurate modelling of magnetic field is very difficult and time consuming, see Napieralski et al. (2015) [6]. Furthermore, it requires accurate values of the abovementioned parameters for all the materials which are used in the building construction (Motley and Keenan 1990) [7] as well as objects and humans which is usually difficult to achieve, see Siauve et al. (2003) [8], López et al. (2015) [9], Glonek G. et al. [10]. Therefore simplified models are used to make the calculation faster and parameter acquisition easier, see Yu and Sebo (1996) [11] and Todaka et al. (2009) [12]. Here we demonstrate that a linear model for electromagnetic wave propagation and approximate values of magnetic permeability, permittivity and refraction together with simplified antenna propagation model are sufficient to obtain preliminary WiFi access point localization in the building, when WiFi-based indoor localization is considered to be deployed in the building. There are many available electromagnetic field models and software solutions for electromagnetic field simulation (Mora et al. 2006) [13], but the most common model for indoor WiFi attenuation involves the path loss exponent which accounts for all propagation phenomenon. For example consider the one-slope model where the loss term is given by Hashemi (1993) [14]:

(1) L= L 0 +10nlog( d ),

where:

L0 – unit loss,

d – distance,

n – power decay index, which depends on material.

This model takes into account the increasing path loss owe to the penetration of obstacles such as walls and floors by varying the power decay index with the distance.

More sophisticated approaches take into account the decreasing penetration loss of walls of the same category as the number of traversed walls increase. The walls that have to be considered are determined by the Obstructed Line-Of Sight path. The parameters of the model can be found in Lott and Forkel (2001) [15]. In this model the loss term is given as follows:

(2) L= L 0 +10nlog( d )+ i=1 l k=1 K wi L wik ,

where: L0 – unit loss,

d – distance,

n – power decay index, which depends on material

Lwik – attenuation due to wall type i and k-th traversed wall,

I – number of wall types,

Kwi – number of traversed walls of category i.

2 Simplified model

Here we introduce a simplified 2D linear model for indoor WiFi electromagnetic signal distribution modelling. The motivation for introducing such a simple model are measurement results which demonstrate, that when the model is used for RSSI localization it provides satisfactory results. The model takes the following form:

(3) L pL = L 0L + L 1 d+ i=1 l k=1 K wi L wik ,

where: L0L – unit loss in linear model,

d – distance,

LLwik – attenuation due to wall type i and k-th traversed wall in linear model,

I – number of wall types,

Kwi – number of traversed walls of category i.

The attenuation LSwik for most common building materials are given in Table 1.

Table 1

Average localization error results for classical and simplified models for different testbeds

No Wall material dB/cm
1 Wood 0,2
2 Gypsum wall 0,2
3 Glass 10
4 Double glazed window 6
5 Concrete 0,35

Comparison between this simplified model and the classical model in 1D for desired attenuation and distance range is depicted in Figure 1. It is clearly visible that simplified model and classical model differs very little within the considered attenuation and distance range. Therefore, the simplified model can effectively simulate WiFi electromagnetic field propagation. In order to verify if the simplified model can be practically used we have carried out experiments comparing the model with measurement results.

Figure 1 Classical vs simplified model of WiFi electromagnetic field RSSI.
Figure 1

Classical vs simplified model of WiFi electromagnetic field RSSI.

3 Experimental verification of the model

The experiments were carried out in one of the laboratories situated at Lodz University of Technology. In these experiments several different receivers and transmitters were used as well as 5 different wall materials. The simplified model of WiFi signal propagation was compared with the measurement results in open space as well as when passing through: wooden, gypsum, glass and concrete wall. The experiment was organized as follows: For each device pair (transmitter-receiver) two WiFi access points were located in two corners of the measurement area and one was located in the middle of the side of the measurement area. Next, the receiver (raspberry computer or a mobile phone) was placed on a robot. The robot followed the line on the floor using an optical sensor and captured WiFi RSSI value in measurement points marked on the floor, see Figure 2. Each measurement was repeated 10 times for each transmitter-receiver pair. As a result for each transmitter-receiver pair we were collecting 36 measurement values (one per each measurement point). As the measurement was repeated 10 times, we were collecting 360 measurements total for each transmitter-receiver pair. Thanks to the use of the robot, the measurements were carried out under the same conditions. In this experiment we have tested several models of WiFi transmitters together with several WiFi receivers (smartphones and Rasberry Pi computers). It should be noted that each transmitter has different WiFi electromagnetic field characteristics, which is influenced by its design, antenna’s shape, number of antennas etc.WiFi RSSI receivers are also of concern as each has different design, sensitivity and antenna characteristics. If one tries to create a very accurate model, it requires taking into consideration all the above mentioned factors which are modelled by many parameters. Hence it is very difficult to model the electromagnetic field propagation for the purpose of WiFi localization. Therefore, it is important to develop simplified models, which are not very accurate, but can be used in practise when all precise parameters are difficult to obtain. Unfortunately, simplified models may lead to large measurement errors and inaccuracy. This is why we tested different hardware combinations in order to demonstrate the usefulness and accuracy of the simplified model. In case of the WiFi transmitter the antenna type strongly influences electromagnetic field propagation, therefore we have tested the hardware with four different antenna solutions:

Figure 2 Testbed for measuring electromagnetic field propagation as a function of distance for WiFi localization.
Figure 2

Testbed for measuring electromagnetic field propagation as a function of distance for WiFi localization.

  1. Internal antenna;

  2. One external antenna;

  3. Two external antennas;

  4. Three external antennas.

The following devices were used as WiFi transmitters:

  1. Zyxel NWA5160N (square-shaped internal antenna)

  2. Zyxel NWA5121-NI (rounded-shape internal antenna)

  3. Zyxel NWA5123 (rounded-shape internal antenna with double transmitter

  4. Asmax WiFi BR-604G (one external antenna)

  5. TP-LINK TL-MR3220 (two external antennas)

  6. Cisco AP541N-A-K9 (three external antennas)

For each experiment two WiFi transmitters of the same model were located in the corners of test track and one was located in the middle of the opposite side of the track (see Figure 2).

When considering WiFi-based indoor localization the electromagnetic field value is usually measured using a mobile phone or single-board computer. As a result not only the transmitter influences the measurement, but also the receiver, which has the parameters which are not always available to the user. Therefore we have used a variety of mobile devices in our experiments:

  1. TP Link TL-wr740n

  2. LG g3s

  3. LG g4s

  4. Samsung Galaxy grand prime sm-g531 h/ds

  5. LG g3 LS990

  6. Huawei P8 Lite 2017

  7. Meizu M3S

  8. Xperia XA

  9. Lenovo P 70

  10. Fly era3

  11. LG g3

  12. Xiaomi Redmi 4

  13. Nexus 5X

  14. Samsung Galaxy J3

  15. Kruger&Matz Flow

  16. Sony Xperia G

  17. Samsung J3

We tested all combinations of transmitter-receiver pairs from the above lists. All the experiments were carried out in open space, as depicted in Figure 2, as well as with the wall made of the materials listed in Table 1. The wall was located between measurement points, as depicted in Figure 3.

Figure 3 Testbed scheme for measuring electromagnetic field propagation as a function of distance for WiFi localization.
Figure 3

Testbed scheme for measuring electromagnetic field propagation as a function of distance for WiFi localization.

4 Experimental results

We have conducted a large number of experiments. Altogether experiments were carried out for 6 WiFi transmitter models, 17 WiFi receivers, and 7 tracks (including different walls and open space). For each measurement point measurements were repeated 10 times, which gives a total of over 257 000 measurements. Therefore here we demonstrate only selected results and averaged summary. Experimental results were compared to the results of simulation using the classical model (2) and simplified linear model (3). The results shown in Figures 4, 5, 6 correspond to the measurement scheme from Figure3. The Figures 4, 5, 6 show the electromagnetic fileld distribution for the TP-LINK TL-MR3220 transmitters and TP Link TL-wr740n receiver. Figures 4, 5, 6 show the results for transmitter 1 from Figure 3.

Figure 4 WiFi electromagnetic field propagation for transmitter 2, open space.
Figure 4

WiFi electromagnetic field propagation for transmitter 2, open space.

Figure 5 WiFi electromagnetic field propagation for transmitter 2, wooden wall.
Figure 5

WiFi electromagnetic field propagation for transmitter 2, wooden wall.

Figure 6 WiFi electromagnetic field propagation for transmitter 2, concrete wall.
Figure 6

WiFi electromagnetic field propagation for transmitter 2, concrete wall.

It is clearly noticeable that the results differ for different transmitter and wall localization in Figures 4 - 6. Nevertheless, when one analyses larger number of measurement results it is difficult to infer which model is better in general. Therefore we have computed average errors for different transmitter-receiver pairs, as we want to create a general model. These average results are for: open space, wooden wall, gypsum wall, glass, double glazed window and concrete wall,as shown in Table 2. The results from Table 2 demonstrate that the simplified model outperforms classical model in terms of average error for all considered testbeds.

Table 2

Average results of mean error for classical and simplified models for different testbeds

No Testbed Classical model mean error [dB] Simplified model mean error [dB]
1 Open space 2,76 2,34
2 Wood 2,61 2,59
3 Gypsum wall 2,78 2,59
4 Glass 2,69 2,51
5 Double glazed window 2,66 2,49
6 Concrete 2,55 2,55

The next step of our experiment was to verify if a simplified model can be used for modelling WiFi electromagnetic field propagation for WiFi-based localization. In order to do this we have computed localization of the robot basing on: average measurement results, classical model and simplified model for each measurement point. Next, we have compared the localization result with ground truth, that is the actual localization of the robot. The average localization error results are presented in Table 3. It can be clearly noticed that the simplified model performs slightly better in terms of WiFi-based localization.

Table 3

Average localization error results for classical and simplified models for different testbeds

No Testbed Classical model based localization error [m] Simplified model based localization error [m] Measurement-based localization error [m]
1 Open space 2,53 2,43 2,03
2 Wood 3,05 2,95 2,55
3 Gypsum wall 2,89 2,79 2,39
4 Glass 3,38 3,28 2,88
5 Double glass window 2,95 2,85 2,45
6 concrete 3,41 3,31 2,91

5 Conclusions

In this paper a novel, simplified linear model for electromagnetic field propagation for the purpose of WiFi localization has been introduced. It considers linear penetration loss of obstacles in the decibel scale. The proposed model is appropriate for many real life applications, such as preliminary WiFi placement and WiFi localization, as it is easy to use and accurate enough even for complex buildings. The main contribution of this work is the study of multiple hardware experiments which have proved that the simplified model can be used despite the heterogeneity of the hardware which is used in WiFi networks. Nevertheless, it should be clear that the experiments presented in this article are not complete when it comes to generalization of the model but they give decent information about possibility of using a simplified linear model for WiFi electromagnetic field propagation for the purpose of WiFi-based localization.

References

[1] Peulic A., Pesovic U., Cucej Z., ZigBee wireless network performance analysis and electromagnetic fields modelling, 14th International Workshop on Systems, Signals and Image Processing and 6th EURASIP, 2007, 349-351.10.1109/IWSSIP.2007.4381113Search in Google Scholar

[2] Jevtić R. B., Ničković J. T., Measuring and simulation electromagnetic field results of wireless router AT-WA1104G, 19th Telecommunications Forum Proceedings of Papers, 2011, 293-296.10.1109/TELFOR.2011.6143548Search in Google Scholar

[3] Chen Y., Chandrasekaran G., Elnahrawy E., Francisco J.A., Kleisouris K., Li X., et al., GRAIL: a general purpose localization system, Sensor Review, 28, 2, 2008.10.1108/02602280810856679Search in Google Scholar

[4] Connolly C., Developments in localisation sensor systems, Sensor Review, 2008, 2, 28.10.1108/sr.2008.08728baa.002Search in Google Scholar

[5] Kong S., Hwang Ch., Kim K, Kim H., Park L, et al., Analytical model for predicting the electromagnetic fields intensity in wireless power transfer systems, IEEE Electrical Design of Advanced Packaging and Systems Symposium, 2011, 1-4.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Napieralski P., Kowalczyk M., Detection of vertical disparity in three-dimensional visualizations, Open Physics, 2017, 15 (1).10.1515/phys-2017-0128Search in Google Scholar

[7] Motley A., Keenan J., Radio Coverage in Buildings British Telecom Tech., 1990, 8 (1), 19-24.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Siauve N., Scorretti R., Burais N., Nicolas L., Nicolas A., Electromagnetic fields and human body: a new challenge for the electromagnetic field computation, COMPEL - The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering, 2003, 3, 22.10.1108/03321640310474868Search in Google Scholar

[9] López A.N., Gonzalez-Rubio J., Villalba Montoya J.M., Garde E.A., Using multiple exposimeters to evaluate the influence of the body when measuring personal exposition to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, COMPEL - The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering, 2015, 4, 34.10.1108/COMPEL-10-2014-0268Search in Google Scholar

[10] Glonek G., Wojciechowski A., Hybrid Orientation Based Human Limbs Motion Tracking, Sensors, 2017, 17(12), 2857.10.3390/s17122857Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Yu Q., Sebo S.A., Simplified Magnetic Field Modeling and Calculation of Large Air-Core Reactor Coils, IEEE Transactions On Magnetics, 1996, 5, 32.10.1109/20.538843Search in Google Scholar

[12] Todaka T., Nakanoue K., Enokizono M., Magnetic field analysis under complex approximation taking account of two-dimensional magnetic properties. COMPEL - The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering, 2009, 1, 28.10.1108/03321640910918904Search in Google Scholar

[13] Mora J., Otín R., Dadvand P., Escolano E., Pasenau M.A., Oñate E., Open tools for electromagnetic simulation programs, COMPEL - The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering, 2006, 3, 25.10.1108/03321640610666709Search in Google Scholar

[14] Hashemi H., The Indoor Radio Propagation Channel, Proc. of the IEEE, 81 (7), 1993, 943-968.10.1109/5.231342Search in Google Scholar

[15] Lott M., Forkel I., A multi-wall-and-floor model for indoor radio propagation IEEE VTS 53rd Vehicular Technology Conference Spring 2001. Proceedings, 2001, 464-468.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-01-28
Accepted: 2019-02-12
Published Online: 2019-08-14

© 2019 P. Lipinski and M. Leplawy, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Non-equilibrium Phase Transitions in 2D Small-World Networks: Competing Dynamics
  3. Harmonic waves solution in dual-phase-lag magneto-thermoelasticity
  4. Multiplicative topological indices of honeycomb derived networks
  5. Zagreb Polynomials and redefined Zagreb indices of nanostar dendrimers
  6. Solar concentrators manufacture and automation
  7. Idea of multi cohesive areas - foundation, current status and perspective
  8. Derivation method of numerous dynamics in the Special Theory of Relativity
  9. An application of Nwogu’s Boussinesq model to analyze the head-on collision process between hydroelastic solitary waves
  10. Competing Risks Model with Partially Step-Stress Accelerate Life Tests in Analyses Lifetime Chen Data under Type-II Censoring Scheme
  11. Group velocity mismatch at ultrashort electromagnetic pulse propagation in nonlinear metamaterials
  12. Investigating the impact of dissolved natural gas on the flow characteristics of multicomponent fluid in pipelines
  13. Analysis of impact load on tubing and shock absorption during perforating
  14. Energy characteristics of a nonlinear layer at resonant frequencies of wave scattering and generation
  15. Ion charge separation with new generation of nuclear emulsion films
  16. On the influence of water on fragmentation of the amino acid L-threonine
  17. Formulation of heat conduction and thermal conductivity of metals
  18. Displacement Reliability Analysis of Submerged Multi-body Structure’s Floating Body for Connection Gaps
  19. Deposits of iron oxides in the human globus pallidus
  20. Integrability, exact solutions and nonlinear dynamics of a nonisospectral integral-differential system
  21. Bounds for partition dimension of M-wheels
  22. Visual Analysis of Cylindrically Polarized Light Beams’ Focal Characteristics by Path Integral
  23. Analysis of repulsive central universal force field on solar and galactic dynamics
  24. Solitary Wave Solution of Nonlinear PDEs Arising in Mathematical Physics
  25. Understanding quantum mechanics: a review and synthesis in precise language
  26. Plane Wave Reflection in a Compressible Half Space with Initial Stress
  27. Evaluation of the realism of a full-color reflection H2 analog hologram recorded on ultra-fine-grain silver-halide material
  28. Graph cutting and its application to biological data
  29. Time fractional modified KdV-type equations: Lie symmetries, exact solutions and conservation laws
  30. Exact solutions of equal-width equation and its conservation laws
  31. MHD and Slip Effect on Two-immiscible Third Grade Fluid on Thin Film Flow over a Vertical Moving Belt
  32. Vibration Analysis of a Three-Layered FGM Cylindrical Shell Including the Effect Of Ring Support
  33. Hybrid censoring samples in assessment the lifetime performance index of Chen distributed products
  34. Study on the law of coal resistivity variation in the process of gas adsorption/desorption
  35. Mapping of Lineament Structures from Aeromagnetic and Landsat Data Over Ankpa Area of Lower Benue Trough, Nigeria
  36. Beta Generalized Exponentiated Frechet Distribution with Applications
  37. INS/gravity gradient aided navigation based on gravitation field particle filter
  38. Electrodynamics in Euclidean Space Time Geometries
  39. Dynamics and Wear Analysis of Hydraulic Turbines in Solid-liquid Two-phase Flow
  40. On Numerical Solution Of The Time Fractional Advection-Diffusion Equation Involving Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo Derivative
  41. New Complex Solutions to the Nonlinear Electrical Transmission Line Model
  42. The effects of quantum spectrum of 4 + n-dimensional water around a DNA on pure water in four dimensional universe
  43. Quantum Phase Estimation Algorithm for Finding Polynomial Roots
  44. Vibration Equation of Fractional Order Describing Viscoelasticity and Viscous Inertia
  45. The Errors Recognition and Compensation for the Numerical Control Machine Tools Based on Laser Testing Technology
  46. Evaluation and Decision Making of Organization Quality Specific Immunity Based on MGDM-IPLAO Method
  47. Key Frame Extraction of Multi-Resolution Remote Sensing Images Under Quality Constraint
  48. Influences of Contact Force towards Dressing Contiguous Sense of Linen Clothing
  49. Modeling and optimization of urban rail transit scheduling with adaptive fruit fly optimization algorithm
  50. The pseudo-limit problem existing in electromagnetic radiation transmission and its mathematical physics principle analysis
  51. Chaos synchronization of fractional–order discrete–time systems with different dimensions using two scaling matrices
  52. Stress Characteristics and Overload Failure Analysis of Cemented Sand and Gravel Dam in Naheng Reservoir
  53. A Big Data Analysis Method Based on Modified Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Algorithms
  54. Semi-supervised Classification Based Mixed Sampling for Imbalanced Data
  55. The Influence of Trading Volume, Market Trend, and Monetary Policy on Characteristics of the Chinese Stock Exchange: An Econophysics Perspective
  56. Estimation of sand water content using GPR combined time-frequency analysis in the Ordos Basin, China
  57. Special Issue Applications of Nonlinear Dynamics
  58. Discrete approximate iterative method for fuzzy investment portfolio based on transaction cost threshold constraint
  59. Multi-objective performance optimization of ORC cycle based on improved ant colony algorithm
  60. Information retrieval algorithm of industrial cluster based on vector space
  61. Parametric model updating with frequency and MAC combined objective function of port crane structure based on operational modal analysis
  62. Evacuation simulation of different flow ratios in low-density state
  63. A pointer location algorithm for computer visionbased automatic reading recognition of pointer gauges
  64. A cloud computing separation model based on information flow
  65. Optimizing model and algorithm for railway freight loading problem
  66. Denoising data acquisition algorithm for array pixelated CdZnTe nuclear detector
  67. Radiation effects of nuclear physics rays on hepatoma cells
  68. Special issue: XXVth Symposium on Electromagnetic Phenomena in Nonlinear Circuits (EPNC2018)
  69. A study on numerical integration methods for rendering atmospheric scattering phenomenon
  70. Wave propagation time optimization for geodesic distances calculation using the Heat Method
  71. Analysis of electricity generation efficiency in photovoltaic building systems made of HIT-IBC cells for multi-family residential buildings
  72. A structural quality evaluation model for three-dimensional simulations
  73. WiFi Electromagnetic Field Modelling for Indoor Localization
  74. Modeling Human Pupil Dilation to Decouple the Pupillary Light Reflex
  75. Principal Component Analysis based on data characteristics for dimensionality reduction of ECG recordings in arrhythmia classification
  76. Blinking Extraction in Eye gaze System for Stereoscopy Movies
  77. Optimization of screen-space directional occlusion algorithms
  78. Heuristic based real-time hybrid rendering with the use of rasterization and ray tracing method
  79. Review of muscle modelling methods from the point of view of motion biomechanics with particular emphasis on the shoulder
  80. The use of segmented-shifted grain-oriented sheets in magnetic circuits of small AC motors
  81. High Temperature Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine Analysis of Thermal Field
  82. Inverse approach for concentrated winding surface permanent magnet synchronous machines noiseless design
  83. An enameled wire with a semi-conductive layer: A solution for a better distibution of the voltage stresses in motor windings
  84. High temperature machines: topologies and preliminary design
  85. Aging monitoring of electrical machines using winding high frequency equivalent circuits
  86. Design of inorganic coils for high temperature electrical machines
  87. A New Concept for Deeper Integration of Converters and Drives in Electrical Machines: Simulation and Experimental Investigations
  88. Special Issue on Energetic Materials and Processes
  89. Investigations into the mechanisms of electrohydrodynamic instability in free surface electrospinning
  90. Effect of Pressure Distribution on the Energy Dissipation of Lap Joints under Equal Pre-tension Force
  91. Research on microstructure and forming mechanism of TiC/1Cr12Ni3Mo2V composite based on laser solid forming
  92. Crystallization of Nano-TiO2 Films based on Glass Fiber Fabric Substrate and Its Impact on Catalytic Performance
  93. Effect of Adding Rare Earth Elements Er and Gd on the Corrosion Residual Strength of Magnesium Alloy
  94. Closed-die Forging Technology and Numerical Simulation of Aluminum Alloy Connecting Rod
  95. Numerical Simulation and Experimental Research on Material Parameters Solution and Shape Control of Sandwich Panels with Aluminum Honeycomb
  96. Research and Analysis of the Effect of Heat Treatment on Damping Properties of Ductile Iron
  97. Effect of austenitising heat treatment on microstructure and properties of a nitrogen bearing martensitic stainless steel
  98. Special Issue on Fundamental Physics of Thermal Transports and Energy Conversions
  99. Numerical simulation of welding distortions in large structures with a simplified engineering approach
  100. Investigation on the effect of electrode tip on formation of metal droplets and temperature profile in a vibrating electrode electroslag remelting process
  101. Effect of North Wall Materials on the Thermal Environment in Chinese Solar Greenhouse (Part A: Experimental Researches)
  102. Three-dimensional optimal design of a cooled turbine considering the coolant-requirement change
  103. Theoretical analysis of particle size re-distribution due to Ostwald ripening in the fuel cell catalyst layer
  104. Effect of phase change materials on heat dissipation of a multiple heat source system
  105. Wetting properties and performance of modified composite collectors in a membrane-based wet electrostatic precipitator
  106. Implementation of the Semi Empirical Kinetic Soot Model Within Chemistry Tabulation Framework for Efficient Emissions Predictions in Diesel Engines
  107. Comparison and analyses of two thermal performance evaluation models for a public building
  108. A Novel Evaluation Method For Particle Deposition Measurement
  109. Effect of the two-phase hybrid mode of effervescent atomizer on the atomization characteristics
  110. Erratum
  111. Integrability analysis of the partial differential equation describing the classical bond-pricing model of mathematical finance
  112. Erratum to: Energy converting layers for thin-film flexible photovoltaic structures
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2019-0039/html
Scroll to top button