Home Derivation method of numerous dynamics in the Special Theory of Relativity
Article Open Access

Derivation method of numerous dynamics in the Special Theory of Relativity

  • Roman Szostek EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 13, 2019
Download Article (PDF)
Open Physics
From the journal Open Physics Volume 17 Issue 1

Abstract

The article presents innovative method of deriving dynamics in the Special Theory of Relativity. This method enables to derive infinitely many dynamics in relativistic mechanics. The authors have shown five examples of these derivations. In this way,It is presented that the dynamics known today as the dynamics of Special Theory of Relativity is only one of infinitely of theoretically possible.

Keywords: dynamics of bodies; Special Theory of Relativity
PACS: 03.30.+p; 02.90.+p

1 Introduction

The currently accepted dynamics of STR have different experimental confirmations. Present article does not deal with these experiments. They are not analyzed, nor evaluated. The purpose of this article is to show that the concrete dynamics of STR does not only result from the kinematics of STR only. Formally and correctly mathematically, many STR dynamics, which have different properties, can be derived within the kinematics STR. Relativistic dynamics is derived based on the relativistic kinematics and one additional assumption, which allows the concept of mass, momentum and kinetic energy to be introduced into the theory. This paper is a discussion about possible assumptions and the dynamics of STR resulting from these assumptions. It presents the author’s method of deriving numerous dynamics for this theory.

The decision, in which dynamic STR is correct, can only result from experiments. Available publications show that the dynamics indicated by Albert Einstein is correct, that is for x = 3/2 (see Section 5). However, because each experiment is fraught with errors, it is possible that more accurate experiments carried out in the future will show that the optimal model of dynamics for x = 3/2 ± Δx, where Δx is a noticeable correction.

Kinematics deals with the movement of bodies without taking their physical characteristics into account. The basic concepts of kinematics are: time, location, transformation, speed and acceleration.

Dynamics deals with the movement of material bodies under the action of forces. The basic concepts of dynamics are: inertial mass, force, momentum and kinetic energy.

Kinematics and dynamics are resulting in mechanics. This study deals with relativistic mechanics, i.e. the Special Theory of Relativity, which unlike classical mechanics, also applies to high-speed.

2 Kinematic assumptions of the Special Theory of Relativity

The kinematics of the Special Theory of Relativity is based on the following assumptions:

I. All inertial systems are equivalent

This assumption means that there is no physical phenomenon, which distinguishes the inertial system. In a particular case, it means that there is no such phenomenon for which the absolute rest is needed to explain. Mathematically, it results from this assumption that each coordinate and time transformation have coefficients with exactly the same numerical values as inverse transformation (with the accuracy to the sign resulting from the velocity direction between the systems).

II. Velocity of light c in vacuum is the same in every direction and in each inertial system

III. Transformation of time and position coordinates between the inertial systems is linear

These assumptions are often written in other equivalent forms.

Based on mentioned assumptions, it is possible to derive Lorentz transformation on which the Special Theory of Relativity is based. There are many different derivation ways of this transformation. Two derivations are presented in monograph [1].

Markings adopted in Figure 1 will be convenient for our needs. Inertial systems move along their x-axis. Symbol v2/1 stands for a velocity of U2 system measured by the observer from U1 system, while v1/2 is a velocity of U1 system measured by the observer from U2 system. In the Special Theory of Relativity occurs that v2/1 = −v1/2.

Figure 1 Relative movement of inertial systems U1 and U2 (v2/1 = −v1/2)
Figure 1

Relative movement of inertial systems U1 and U2 (v2/1 = −v1/2)

Lorentz transformation from U2 to U1 system has a form of:

(1) t 1 = 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ( t 2 + v 2 / 1 c 2 x 2 )
(2) x 1 = 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ( v 2 / 1 t 2 + x 2 )
(3) y 1 = y 2 , z 1 = z 2

Lorentz transformation from U1 to U2 system has a form of:

(4) t 2 = 1 1 − ( v 1 / 2 / c ) 2 ( t 1 + v 1 / 2 c 2 x 1 )
(5) x 2 = 1 1 − ( v 1 / 2 / c ) 2 ( v 1 / 2 t 1 + x 1 )
(6) y 2 = y 1 , z 2 = z 1

Transformation (1) – (3) and (4) – (6) includes complete information on the relativistic kinematics.

3 Selected properties of relativistic kinematics

In order to derive dynamics two formulas from kinematics, i.e. (20) and (23) from kinematics will be needed. They will be derived out of transformation (1) – (3).

3.1 Transformation of velocity

Determine the differentials from transformation (1) – (3)

(7) d t 1 = 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ( d t 2 + v 2 / 1 c 2 d x 2 )
(8) d x 1 = 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ( v 2 / 1 d t 2 + d x 2 )
(9) d y 1 = d y 2 , d z 1 = d z 2

From the inertial system U1 and U2, the moving body U3 is observed. In U1 system, it has a velocity of v3/1,while in U2 system it has a velocity of v3/2. The components of these velocities are presented in Figure 2.

Figure 2 Movement of the body from two inertial systems U1 and U2
Figure 2

Movement of the body from two inertial systems U1 and U2

The coordinates of body U3 position in U1 system are x1, y1, z1. At the same time in U2 system these coordinates are x2, y2, z2. Since the body U3 moves, these coordinates change in time. When time dt1 elapses in U1 system then time dt2 elapses in U2 system. For such indications the changes of coordinates of body U3 position in U1 system in the time interval dt1 are dx1, dy1, dz1. Changes of coordinates of body U3 position in U2 system in the time interval dt2 are dx2, dy2, dz2.

The body velocity U3 in inertial system U2 has the following components:

(10) v 3 / 2 x = d x 2 d t 2 , v 3 / 2 y = d y 2 d t 2 , v 3 / 2 z = d z 2 d t 2

The body velocity U3 in inertial system U1 has the following components:

(11) v 3 / 1 x = d x 1 d t 1 , v 3 / 1 y = d y 1 d t 1 , v 3 / 1 z = d z 1 d t 1

When differentials (7) – (9) are put into Eqs. (11), one will receive

(12) v3/1x=11−(v2/1/c)2(v2/1dt2+dx2)11−(v2/1/c)2(dt2+v2/1c2dx2)v3/1y=dy211−(v2/1/c)2(dt2+v2/1c2dx2)v3/1z=dz211−(v2/1/c)2(dt2+v2/1c2dx2)

i.e.

(13) v3/1x=v2/1+dx2/dt21+v2/1c2(dx2/dt2)v3/1y=1−(v2/1/c)2dy2/dt21+v2/1c2(dx2/dt2)v3/1z=1−(v2/1/c)2dz2/dt21+v2/1c2(dx2/dt2)

On the basis of (10) the desired velocity transformation from U2 to U1 system is obtained

(14) v3/1x=v3/2x+v2/11+v3/2xv2/1c2v3/1y=1−(v2/1/c)2v3/2y1+v3/2xv2/1c2v3/1z=1−(v2/1/c)2v3/2z1+v3/2xv2/1c2

In special case,when U3 body moves parallel to x-axis then occurs

(15) v 3 / 1 x = v 3 / 1 , v 3 / 2 x = v 3 / 2 , v 3 / 1 y = v 3 / 2 y = 0 , v 3 / 1 z = v 3 / 2 z = 0

Then velocity transformation (14) takes the form of formula to sum-up parallel velocities

(16) v 3 / 1 = v 3 / 2 + v 2 / 1 1 + v 3 / 2 v 2 / 1 c 2

3.2 Change of velocity seen from different inertial systems

The body at rest in U3 system has momentary acceleration to U3′ system. The body movement is observed from U1 and U2 systems. The velocities of inertial systems are parallel to each other. Markings shown in Figure 3 are adopted.

Figure 3 Increases in the velocity seen in inertial systems U1 and U2
Figure 3

Increases in the velocity seen in inertial systems U1 and U2

The differentials from formula (16) will be determined:

(17) d v 3 / 1 = d v 3 / 2 + v 2 / 1 1 + ( v 3 / 2 v 2 / 1 ) / c 2 d v 3 / 2 d v 3 / 2 = 1 + v 3 / 2 v 2 / 1 c 2 − ( v 3 / 2 + v 2 / 1 ) v 2 / 1 c 2 1 + v 3 / 2 v 2 / 1 c 2 2 d v 3 / 2
(18) d v 3 / 1 = 1 − v 2 / 1 2 c 2 1 + v 3 / 2 v 2 / 1 c 2 2 d v 3 / 2

If U3 system is U2 system then it is necessary to replace index 3 with 2. Then,

(19) d v 3 / 1 = d v 2 / 1 , v 3 / 2 = v 2 / 2 = 0 , d v 3 / 2 = d v 2 / 2

On this basis, the formula (18) takes a form of

(20) d v 2 / 2 = d v 2 / 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2

Relation (20) is related to the change of body velocity seen in the inertial system U2, in which the body is located (dv2/2), and the change of velocity seen from another inertial system U1 (dv2/1).

3.3 Time dilatation

If motionless body is in U2 system, then for its coordinates occurs

(21) d x 2 d t 2 = 0

Based on time transformation (7) one receives

(22) d t 1 d t 2 = 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ( 1 + v 2 / 1 c 2 d x 2 d t 2 ) ⇒ d x 2 d t 2 = 0 d t 1 d t 2 = 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2

On this basis we receive the formula for time dilatation of motionless body with regard to U2 system

(23) d x 2 d t 2 = 0 ⇒ d t 2 = 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ⋅ d t 1

Recording of time dilatation in a form of (23) is more precise than the commonly used recording, as it has a form of implications. Such a record makes it clear that such dilatation applies only to motionless bodies in relation to U2 system (or for events occurring in the same position in relation to U2 system).

4 Dynamics in the Special Theory of Relativity

All dissertations will be conducted only for one-dimensional model, i.e. all analyzed vector values will be parallel to x-axis. Each derived dynamic can easily be generalized into three-dimensional cases.

In order to derive dynamics in the Special Theory of Relativity (STR), it is necessary to adopt an additional assumption, which allows the concept of mass, momentum and kinetic energy to be introduced into the theory. Depending on the assumption, different dynamics of bodies are received.

The inertial mass body resting in inertial frame of reference is determined by m0 (rest mass). The rest mass is determined on the base unit of mass and the method of comparing any mass with this base unit. The inertial mass body at rest in U2, as seen from U1 system, is determined by m2/1 (relativistic mass). It is worth to note that the relativistic mass in this case is an inertial mass that occurs in the Newton’s second law, rather than mass occurring in the formula for momentum, as assumed in the STR. In this way, a different definition of relativistic mass has been adopted, than one in the STR. Such a definition of the relativistic mass is more convenient in deriving dynamics.

The body of m0 inertial mass is in U2 system. It is affected by force F2/2 that causes acceleration of dv2/2/dt2. Therefore, for the observer from U2 system, the Newton’s second law takes a form of

(24) F 2 / 2 := m 0 ⋅ a 2 / 2 = m 0 d v 2 / 2 d t 2

For the observer from U1 system, inertial mass of the same body is m2/1. For this observer, the force F2/1 acts on the body, causing acceleration of dv2/1/dt1. Therefore, for the observer from U1 the Newton’s second law takes the form of

(25) F 2 / 1 := f ( v 2 / 1 ) ⋅ m 0 ⋅ a 2 / 1 = m 2 / 1 ( v 2 / 1 ) ⋅ a 2 / 1 = m 2 / 1 ⋅ a 2 / 1 = m 2 / 1 d v 2 / 1 d t 1

Equation (25) means that a generalized form of the Newton’s second law is postulated. This generalized form contains an additional parameter f(v). From the formula (24) shows that always f (0) = 1. In classical mechanics f(v) = 1, while in the current dynamics STR f(v) = 3 (formula (32)). Determining another form of parameter f(v) leads to other dynamics for STR. The inertial relativistic mass m2/1 is the product of this additional parameter f(v) and the inertial mass body at rest m0. In this article, the parameter f(v) will not be used, only the inertial relativistic mass m2/1.

Definitions identical as in classical mechanics apply for momentum and kinetic energy.

For the observer from U2 system, the change of this body momentum can be recorded in the following forms

(26) d p 2 / 2 := F 2 / 2 ⋅ d t 2 = m 0 ⋅ a 2 / 2 ⋅ d t 2 = m 0 d v 2 / 2 d t 2 d t 2 = m 0 ⋅ d v 2 / 2

For the observer from U1 system, the change of this body momentum can be recorded in the following forms

(27) d p 2 / 1 := F 2 / 1 ⋅ d t 1 = m 2 / 1 ⋅ a 2 / 1 ⋅ d t 1 = m 2 / 1 d v 2 / 1 d t 1 d t 1 = m 2 / 1 ⋅ d v 2 / 1

where:

  1. dp2/2 is a change of body momentum with rest mass m0 in the inertial system U2, measured by the observer from the same inertial system U2,

  2. dp2/1 is a change of body momentum in the inertial system U2, measured by the observer from the same inertial system U1.

Kinetic energy of the body is equal of the work into its acceleration. For the observer from U1 system, the change of kinetic energy of this body is as follows

(28) d E 2 / 1 := F 2 / 1 ⋅ d x 2 / 1 = m 2 / 1 ⋅ a 2 / 1 ⋅ d x 2 / 1 = m 2 / 1 d v 2 / 1 d t 1 d x 2 / 1 = m 2 / 1 d x 2 / 1 d t 1 d v 2 / 1 = m 2 / 1 ⋅ v 2 / 1 ⋅ d v 2 / 1

where:

– dE2/1 is a change of kinetic energy of the body in inertial system U2, measured by the observer from the inertial system U1.

4.1 STR dynamics with constant force (STR/F)

In this section, a model of dynamics of bodies based on the assumption that the force accelerating of the body (parallel to x-axis) is the same for an observer from every inertial system will be derived (hence indication F).

4.1.1 The relativistic mass in STR/F

In the model STR/F it is assumed, that

(29) F 2 / 1 F := F 2 / 2

Having introduced (24) and (25), one obtains

(30) m 2 / 1 F d v 2 / 1 d t 1 = m 0 d v 2 / 2 d t 2

On the base (20) and (23), one has

(31) m 2 / 1 F d v 2 / 1 d t 1 = m 0 d v 2 / 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ⋅ d t 1

Hence, a formula for relativistic mass of the body that is located in the system U2 and is seen from the system U1 is obtained, when assumption (29) is satisfied, as below

(32) m 2 / 1 F = m 0 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 3 / 2

4.1.2 The momentum in STR/F

The body of rest mass m0 is associated with the system U2. To determine the momentum of the body relative to the system U1 a substitution of (32) to (27)

(33) d p 2 / 1 F = m 2 / 1 F ⋅ d v 2 / 1 = m 0 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 3 / 2 d v 2 / 1 = m 0 c 3 1 ( c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 ) 3 / 2 d v 2 / 1

The body momentum is a sum of increases in its momentum, when the body is accelerated from the inertial system U1 (the body has velocity 0) to the inertial system U2 (the body has velocity v2/1), i.e.

(34) p 2 / 1 F = m 0 c 3 ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 1 ( c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 ) 3 / 2 d v 2 / 1

From the work [2] (formula 72, p. F167) it is possible to read out, that

(35) ∫ d x ( a 2 − x 2 ) 3 / 2 = x a 2 a 2 − x 2 , a ≠ 0

After applying the integral (35) to (34) the formula for the body momentum in U2 system is received and measured by the observer from U1 system in a form of

(36) p 2 / 1 F = m 0 c 3 v 2 / 1 c 2 c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 = m 0 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 v 2 / 1

This formula is identical to the formula for momentum known from the STR, for the same reasons as in the case of momentum. This is because the dynamics known from the STR is derived from the assumption (29). It was adopted unconsciously, because it was considered as necessary. The awareness of this assumption allows to its change and derives other dynamics.

As already mentioned above, the definition of relativistic mass adopted is different from the definition adopted in the STR. In this case, the relativistic mass is the one, which occurs in the Newton’s second law (25). In this particular case, it is expressed in terms of dependency (32). In the STR, the relativistic mass is the one, which occurs in the formula (36) per momentum.

4.1.3 The momentum in STR/F for small velocities

For small velocity v2/1 << c momentum (36) comes down to the momentum from classical mechanics, because

(37) v 2 / 1 << c ⇒ p 2 / 1 F ≈ m 0 v 2 / 1

4.1.4 The kinetic energy in STR/F

A determination of the formula for kinetic energy will be given. The dependence for the relativistic mass (32) is introduced to the formula (28)

(38) d E 2 / 1 F = m 2 / 1 F ⋅ v 2 / 1 ⋅ d v 2 / 1 = m 0 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 3 / 2 v 2 / 1 d v 2 / 1 = m 0 c 3 v 2 / 1 ( c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 ) 3 / 2 d v 2 / 1

The kinetic energy of body is a sum of increases in its kinetic energy, when the body is accelerated from the inertial system U1 (the body has velocity 0) to the inertial system U2 (the body has velocity v2/1), i.e.

(39) E 2 / 1 F = m 0 c 3 ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 v 2 / 1 ( c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 ) 3 / 2 d v 2 / 1

From the work [2] (formula 74, p. 167) it is possible to read out, that

(40) ∫ x d x ( a 2 − x 2 ) 3 / 2 = 1 a 2 − x 2

After applying the integral (40) to (39) the formula for the kinetic energy of the body in U2 system and measured by the observer from U1 system in a form of

(41) E 2 / 1 F = m 0 c 3 1 c 2 − x 2 0 v 2 / 1 = m 0 c 3 1 c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 − 1 c = m 0 c 2 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 − m 0 c 2

This formula is identical to the formula for kinetic energy known from the STR, for the same reasons as in the case of momentum (36).

4.1.5 The kinetic energy in STR/F for small velocities

Formula (41) can be written in the form

(42) E 2 / 1 F = m 0 c 2 1 − 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ⋅ 1 + 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 1 + 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2
(43) E 2 / 1 F = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2 2 1 − v 2 / 1 2 c 2 + 1 − v 2 / 1 2 c 2

On this basis, for small values v2/1 ≪c one receives

(44) v 2 / 1 ≪ c ⇒ E 2 / 1 F ≈ m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2 2 1 + 1 = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2

4.1.6 The force in STR/F

Due to the assumption (29) value measurement of the same force by two different observers is identical.

4.2 STR dynamics with constant momentum change (STR/Δp)

In this section, a model of dynamics of bodies based on the assumption that the change in momentum of the body (parallel to x-axis) is the same for an observer from every inertial system will be derived (hence indication Δp).

These dynamics seem particularly interesting, because the conservation law of momentum is a fundamental law. Assumption that the change of body momentum is the same for every observer seems to be a natural extension of this law.

4.2.1 The relativistic mass in STR/Δp

In the model STR/Δp it is assumed, that

(45) d p 2 / 1 Δ p := d p 2 / 2

Having introduced (26) and (27), one obtains

(46) m 2 / 1 Δ p d v 2 / 1 = m 0 d v 2 / 2

On the base (20), one has

(47) m 2 / 1 Δ p d v 2 / 1 = m 0 d v 2 / 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2

Hence, a formula for relativistic mass of the body that is located in the system U2 and is seen from the system U1 is obtained, when assumption (45) is satisfied, as below

(48) m 2 / 1 Δ p = m 0 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2

4.2.2 The momentum in STR/Δp

The body of rest mass m0 is associated with the system U2. To determine the momentum of the body relative to the system U1 a substitution of (48) to (27) is made

(49) d p 2 / 1 Δ p = m 2 / 1 Δ p ⋅ d v 2 / 1 = m 0 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 d v 2 / 1 = m 0 c 2 1 c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 d v 2 / 1

The body momentum is a sum of increases in its momentum, when the body is accelerated from the inertial system U1 (the body has velocity 0) to the inertial system U2 (the body has velocity v2/1), i.e.

(50) p 2 / 1 Δ p = m 0 c 2 ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 1 c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 d v 2 / 1

From the work [2] (formula 52, p. 160) it is possible to read out, that

(51) ∫ d x a 2 − x 2 = 1 2 a ln a + x a − x , a ≠ 0

After applying the integral (51) to (50) the formula for the body momentum in U2 system and measured by the observer from U1 system is received in a form of

(52) p 2 / 1 Δ p = m 0 c 2 1 2 c ln c + x c − x 0 v 2 / 1 = m 0 c 2 ln c + v 2 / 1 c − v 2 / 1

4.2.3 The momentum in STR/Δp for small velocities

Formula (52) can be written in the form

(53) p 2 / 1 Δ p = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 c v 2 / 1 ln c + v 2 / 1 c − v 2 / 1 = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 ln ( 1 + v 2 / 1 / c ) c / v 2 / 1 ( 1 − v 2 / 1 / c ) c / v 2 / 1
(54) p 2 / 1 Δ p = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 ln 1 + 1 c / v 2 / 1 c / v 2 / 1 1 − 1 c / v 2 / 1 c / v 2 / 1

On this basis, for small values v2/1 << c one receives

(55) v 2 / 1 ≪ c ⇒ p 2 / 1 Δ p ≈ m 0 v 2 / 1 2 ln e 1 / e = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 ln ⁡ ( e 2 ) = m 0 v 2 / 1

4.2.4 The kinetic energy in STR/Δp

A determination of the formula for kinetic energy will be given. The dependence for the relativistic mass (48) is introduced to the formula (28)

(56) d E 2 / 1 Δ p = m 2 / 1 Δ p ⋅ v 2 / 1 ⋅ d v 2 / 1 = m 0 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 v 2 / 1 d v 2 / 1 = m 0 c 2 v 2 / 1 c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 d v 2 / 1

The kinetic energy of body is a sum of increases in its kinetic energy, when the body is accelerated from the inertial system U1 (the body has velocity 0) to the inertial system U2 (the body has velocity v2/1), i.e.

(57) E 2 / 1 Δ p = m 0 c 2 ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 v 2 / 1 c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 d v 2 / 1

From the work [2] (formula 56, p. 160) it is possible to read out, that

(58) ∫ x a 2 − x 2 d x = − 1 2 ln a 2 − x 2

After applying the integral (58) to (57) the formula for the kinetic energy of the body in U2 system and measured by the observer from U1 system in a form of

(59) E 2 / 1 Δ p = − m 0 c 2 1 2 ln c 2 − x 2 0 v 2 / 1 = − m 0 c 2 2 ln ⁡ ( c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 ) + m 0 c 2 2 ln ⁡ ( c 2 )
(60) E 2 / 1 Δ p = m 0 c 2 2 ln ⁡ c 2 c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 = m 0 c 2 2 ln ⁡ 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2

4.2.5 The kinetic energy in STR/Δp for small velocities

Formula (60) can be written in the form

(61) E 2 / 1 Δ p = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2 c 2 v 2 / 1 2 ln ⁡ 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2 ln ⁡ 1 [ 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ] ( c / v 2 / 1 ) 2
(62) E 2 / 1 Δ p = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2 ln ⁡ 1 1 − 1 ( c / v 2 / 1 ) 2 ( c / v 2 / 1 ) 2

On this basis, for small values v2/1 << c one receives

(63) v 2 / 1 ≪ c ⇒ E 2 / 1 Δ p ≈ m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2 ln ⁡ 1 1 / e = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2

4.2.6 The force in STR/Δp

Body with rest mass m0 is related to U2 system. It is affected by force that causes acceleration. For the observer from this system, the acceleration force has in accordance with (24) the following value

(64) F 2 / 2 = m 0 d v 2 / 2 d t 2

For the observer from U1 system, acceleration force has in accordance with (25) the following value

(65) F 2 / 1 Δ p = m 2 / 1 Δ p d v 2 / 1 d t 1

If to divide parties’ equation (65) by (64), then on the basis of (20) and (23) one will receive

(66) F 2 / 1 Δ p F 2 / 2 = m 2 / 1 Δ p m 0 ⋅ d t 2 d t 1 ⋅ d v 2 / 1 d v 2 / 2 = m 2 / 1 Δ p m 0 ( 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ) 3 / 2

On the basis of (48) a relation between measurements of the same force by two different observers is obtained

(67) F 2 / 1 Δ p = 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ⋅ F 2 / 2

The highest value of force is measured by the observer from the inertial system in which the body is located.

4.3 STR dynamics with constant mass (STR/m)

In this section, a model of dynamics of bodies, based on the assumption that body weight is the same for an observer from each inertial reference system, will be derived (hence indication m).

4.3.1 The relativistic mass in STR/m

In the model STR/m it is assumed, that

(68) m 2 / 1 m := m 0

Therefore, for the observer from inertial system U1, the body mass in U2 system is the same as the rest mass.

4.3.2 The momentum in STR/m

The body of rest mass m0 is associated with the system U2. To determine the momentum of the body relative to the system U1 a substitution of (68) to (27)

(69) d p 2 / 1 m = m 2 / 1 m ⋅ d v 2 / 1 = m 0 d v 2 / 1

The body momentum is a sum of increases in its momentum, when the body is accelerated from the inertial system U1 (the body has velocity 0) to the inertial system U2 (the body has velocity v2/1), i.e.

(70) p 2 / 1 m = m 0 ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 d v 2 / 1 = m 0 v 2 / 1

In this relativistic dynamics the momentum is expressed with the same equation as in classical mechanics.

4.3.3 The kinetic energy in STR/m

A determination of the formula for kinetic energy will be given. The dependence for the relativistic mass (68) is introduced to the formula (28)

(71) d E 2 / 1 m = m 2 / 1 m ⋅ v 2 / 1 ⋅ d v 2 / 1 = m 0 v 2 / 1 d v 2 / 1

The kinetic energy of body is a sum of increases in its kinetic energy, when the body is accelerated from the inertial system U1 (the body has velocity 0) to the inertial system U2 (the body has velocity v2/1), i.e.

(72) E 2 / 1 m = m 0 ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 v 2 / 1 d v 2 / 1 = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2

In this relativistic dynamics the kinetic energy is expressed with the same equation as in classical mechanics.

4.3.4 The force in STR/m

Body with rest mass m0 is related to U2 system. It is affected by force that causes acceleration. For the observer from this system, the acceleration force has in accordance with (24) the following value

(73) F 2 / 2 = m 0 d v 2 / 2 d t 2

For the observer from U1 system, acceleration force has in accordance with (25) the following value

(74) F 2 / 1 m = m 2 / 1 m d v 2 / 1 d t 1 = m 0 d v 2 / 1 d t 1

If to divide parties’ equation (74) by (73), then on the basis of (20) and (23) one will receive

(75) F 2 / 1 m F 2 / 2 = d t 2 d t 1 ⋅ d v 2 / 1 d v 2 / 2 = ( 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ) 3 / 2

i.e.

(76) F 2 / 1 m = ( 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ) 3 / 2 ⋅ F 2 / 2

The highest value of force is measured by the observer from the inertial system in which the body is located.

4.3.5 Discussion on the STR/m dynamics

Obtaining a relativistic dynamics, in which there is no relativistic mass, and equations for kinetic energy and momentum are identical as in classical mechanics can be surprising, because in relativistic mechanics it is believed that the accelerated body can achieve maximum speed c. However, this dynamics is formally correct.

If the body velocity v2/1 reaches c value, then according to (76)

(77) F 2 / 1 m = ( 1 − 1 − ) 3 / 2 ⋅ F 2 / 2 ≈ 0

In the inertial system U2, in which the body is located, can be affected by acceleration force F2/2 of any, but finite value. However, from a perspective of the inertial system U1, towards which the body has c velocity, the same force is zero. This means that from a perspective of U1 system, it is not possible to perform work on the body, which will increase its kinetic energy indefinitely. From the relation (72) it results that the kinetic energy, that a body with mass m0 and velocity c has, a value has

(78) E max m = m 0 c 2 2

4.4 STR dynamics with constant force to its operation time (STR/F /Δt)

In this section, a model of dynamics of bodies based on the assumption that the force that accelerates of the body (parallel to x-axis) divided by the time of operation of this force is the same for an observer from every inertial system will be derived (hence indication F/Δt).

4.4.1 The relativistic mass in STR/F/Δt

In the model STR/F/Δt it is assumed, that

(79) F 2 / 1 F / Δ t d t 1 := F 2 / 2 d t 2

Having introduced (24) and (25), one obtains

(80) m 2 / 1 F / Δ t d v 2 / 1 d t 1 1 d t 1 = m 0 d v 2 / 2 d t 2 1 d t 2

On the base (20) and (23), one has

(81) m 2 / 1 F / Δ t d v 2 / 1 d t 1 2 = m 0 d v 2 / 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ( 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ) d t 1 2

Hence, a formula for relativistic mass of the body that is located in the system U2 and is seen from the system U1 is obtained, when assumption (79) is satisfied, as below

(82) m 2 / 1 F / Δ t = m 0 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 2

4.4.2 The momentum in STR/F/Δt

The body of rest mass m0 is associated with the system U2. To determine the momentum of the body relative to the system U1 a substitution of (82) to (27)

(83) d p 2 / 1 F / Δ t = m 2 / 1 F / Δ t ⋅ d v 2 / 1 = m 0 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 2 d v 2 / 1 = m 0 c 4 1 ( c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 ) 2 d v 2 / 1

The body momentum is a sum of increases in its momentum, when the body is accelerated from the inertial system U1 (the body has velocity 0) to the inertial system U2 (the body has velocity v2/1), i.e.

(84) p 2 / 1 F / Δ t = m 0 c 4 ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 1 ( c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 ) 2 d v 2 / 1

From the work [2] (formula 54, p. 160) it is possible to read out, that

(85) ∫ d x ( a 2 − x 2 ) 2 = x 2 a 2 ( a 2 − x 2 ) + 1 4 a 3 ln a + x a − x , a ≠ 0

After applying the integral (85) to (84) the formula for the body momentum in U2 system and measured by the observer from U1 system in a form of

(86) p 2 / 1 F / Δ t = m 0 c 4 x 2 c 2 ( c 2 − x 2 ) + 1 4 c 3 ln ⁡ ( c + x ) ( c − x ) 0 v 2 / 1 = m 0 c c v 2 / 1 2 ( c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 ) + 1 4 ln ⁡ ( c + v 2 / 1 ) ( c − v 2 / 1 )
(87) p 2 / 1 F / Δ t = m 0 v 2 / 1 1 2 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 + ln c + v 2 / 1 c − v 2 / 1 c 2 v 2 / 1

4.4.3 The momentum in STR/F/Δt for small velocities

Formula (87) can be written in the form

(88) p 2 / 1 F / Δ t = m 0 v 2 / 1 1 2 ( 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ) + 1 4 ln ( 1 + v 2 / 1 / c ) c / v 2 / 1 ( 1 − v 2 / 1 / c ) c / v 2 / 1
(89) p 2 / 1 F / Δ t = m 0 v 2 / 1 1 2 ( 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ) + 1 4 ln 1 + 1 c / v 2 / 1 c / v 2 / 1 1 − 1 c / v 2 / 1 c / v 2 / 1

On this basis, for small values v2/1 << c one receives

(90) v 2 / 1 ≪ c ⇒ p 2 / 1 F / Δ t ≈ m 0 v 2 / 1 1 2 + 1 4 ln e 1 / e = m 0 v 2 / 1 1 2 + 1 4 ln ⁡ ( e 2 ) = m 0 v 2 / 1

4.4.4 The kinetic energy in STR/F/Δt

A determination of the formula for kinetic energy will be given. The dependence for the relativistic mass (82) is introduced to the formula (28)

(91) d E 2 / 1 F / Δ t = m 2 / 1 F / Δ t ⋅ v 2 / 1 ⋅ d v 2 / 1 = m 0 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 2 v 2 / 1 d v 2 / 1 = m 0 c 4 v 2 / 1 ( c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 ) 2 d v 2 / 1

The kinetic energy of body is a sum of increases in its kinetic energy, when the body is accelerated from the inertial system U1 (the body has velocity 0) to the inertial system U2 (the body has velocity v2/1), i.e.

(92) E 2 / 1 F / Δ t = m 0 c 4 ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 v 2 / 1 ( c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 ) 2 d v 2 / 1

From the work [2] (formula 58, p. 160) it is possible to read out, that

(93) ∫ x d x ( a 2 − x 2 ) 2 = 1 2 ( a 2 − x 2 )

After applying the integral (93) do (92) the formula for the kinetic energy of the body in U2 system and measured by the observer from U1 system in a form of

(94) E 2 / 1 F / Δ t = m 0 c 4 1 2 ( c 2 − x 2 ) 0 v 2 / 1 = m 0 c 4 2 1 ( c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 ) − m 0 c 4 2 1 c 2
(95) E 2 / 1 F / Δ t = m 0 c 2 2 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 − m 0 c 2 2 = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2

The formula for kinetic energy (95) was derived from the work [3], due to the fact that the author adopted a different assumption than the one on which the dynamics known from the STR was based.

4.4.5 The kinetic energy in STR/F/Δt for small velocities

For small velocity v2/1≪c kinetic energy (95) comes down to the kinetic energy from classical mechanics, because

(96) v 2 / 1 ≪ c ⇒ E 2 / 1 F / Δ t ≈ m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2 ⋅ 1 1 = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2

4.4.6 The force in STR/F/Δt

Body with rest mass m0 is related to U2 system. It is affected by force that causes acceleration. For the observer from this system, the acceleration force has in accordance with (24) the following value

(97) F 2 / 2 = m 0 d v 2 / 2 d t 2

For the observer from U1 system, acceleration force has in accordance with (25) the following value

(98) F 2 / 1 F / Δ t = m 2 / 1 F / Δ t d v 2 / 1 d t 1

If to divide parties’ equation (98) by (97), then on the basis of (20) and (23) one will receive

(99) F 2 / 1 F / Δ t F 2 / 2 = m 2 / 1 F / Δ t m 0 ⋅ d t 2 d t 1 ⋅ d v 2 / 1 d v 2 / 2 = m 2 / 1 F / Δ t m 0 ( 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ) 3 / 2

On the basis of (82) relation between measurements of the same force by two different observers is obtained

(100) F 2 / 1 F / Δ t = 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ⋅ F 2 / 2

The lowest value of force is measured by the observer from the inertial system in which the body is located.

4.5 STR dynamics with constant mass to elapse of observer’s time (STR/m/Δt)

In this subchapter a model of body dynamics will be derived based on the assumption that the body mass divided by the elapse of time in observer system is the same for the observer from each inertial frame of reference (hence indication m/Δt).

4.5.1 The relativistic mass in STR/m/Δt

In the model STR/m/Δt it is assumed, that

(101) m 2 / 1 m / Δ t d t 1 := m 0 d t 2

On the base (23), one obtains

(102) m 2 / 1 m / Δ t d t 1 = m 0 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ⋅ d t 1

Hence, a formula for relativistic mass of the body that is located in the system U2 and is seen from the system U1 is obtained, when assumption (101) is satisfied, as below

(103) m 2 / 1 m / Δ t = m 0 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2

4.5.2 The momentum in STR/m/Δt

The body of rest mass m0 is associated with the system U2. To determine the momentum of the body relative to the system U1 a substitution of (103) to (27)

(104) d p 2 / 1 m / Δ t = m 2 / 1 m / Δ t ⋅ d v 2 / 1 = m 0 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 d v 2 / 1 = m 0 c 1 c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 d v 2 / 1

The body momentum is a sum of increases in its momentum, when the body is accelerated from the inertial system U1 (the body has velocity 0) to the inertial system U2 (the body has velocity v2/1), i.e.

(105) p 2 / 1 m / Δ t = m 0 c 2 ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 1 c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 d v 2 / 1

From the work [2] (formula 71, p. 167) it is possible to read out, that

(106) ∫ d x a 2 − x 2 = arcsin ⁡ x a , a > 0

After applying the integral (106) to (105) the formula for the body momentum in U2 system and measured by the observer from U1 system in a form of

(107) p 2 / 1 m / Δ t = m 0 c ⋅ arcsin ⁡ v 2 / 1 c 0 v 2 / 1 = m 0 c ⋅ arcsin ⁡ v 2 / 1 c

4.5.3 The momentum in STR/m/Δt for small velocities

Formula (107) can be written in the form

(108) p 2 / 1 m / Δ t = m 0 v 2 / 1 arcsin ⁡ v 2 / 1 c v 2 / 1 c

On this basis, for small values v2/1 << c one receives

(109) v 2 / 1 ≪ c ⇒ p 2 / 1 m / Δ t ≈ m 0 v 2 / 1

4.5.4 The kinetic energy in STR/m/Δt

A determination of the formula for kinetic energy will be given. The dependence for the relativistic mass (103) is introduced to the formula (28)

(110) d E 2 / 1 m / Δ t = m 2 / 1 m / Δ t ⋅ v 2 / 1 ⋅ d v 2 / 1 = m 0 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 v 2 / 1 d v 2 / 1 = m 0 c v 2 / 1 c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 d v 2 / 1

The kinetic energy of body is a sum of increases in its kinetic energy, when the body is accelerated from the inertial system U1 (the body has velocity 0) to the inertial system U2 (the body has velocity v2/1), i.e.

(111) E 2 / 1 m / Δ t = m 0 c ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 v 2 / 1 c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 d v 2 / 1

From the work [2] (formula 73, p. 167) it is possible to read out, that

(112) ∫ x a 2 − x 2 d x = − a 2 − x 2

After applying the integral (112) do (111) the formula for the kinetic energy of the body in U2 system and measured by the observer from U1 system in a form of

(113) E 2 / 1 m / Δ t = − m 0 c c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 0 v 2 / 1 = − m 0 c c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 + m 0 c c 2
(114) E 2 / 1 m / Δ t = m 0 c 2 − m 0 c c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 = m 0 c 2 ( 1 − 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 )

4.5.5 The kinetic energy in STR/m/Δt for small velocities

Formula (114) can be written in the form

(115) E 2 / 1 m / Δ t = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2 ⋅ 2 c 2 v 2 / 1 2 ⋅ ( 1 − 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ) ( 1 + 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ) 1 + 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2
(116) E 2 / 1 m / Δ t = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2 ⋅ 2 c 2 v 2 / 1 2 ⋅ 1 − ( 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ) 1 + 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2 2 1 + 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2

On this basis, for small values v2/1 ≪c one receives

(117) v 2 / 1 << c ⇒ E 2 / 1 m / Δ t ≈ m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2 ⋅ 2 2 = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2

4.5.6 The force in STR/m/Δt

Body with rest mass m0 is related to U2 system. It is affected by force that causes acceleration. For the observer from this system, the acceleration force has in accordance with (24) the following value

(118) F 2 / 2 = m 0 d v 2 / 2 d t 2

For the observer from U1 system, acceleration force has in accordance with (25) the following value

(119) F 2 / 1 m / Δ t = m 2 / 1 m / Δ t d v 2 / 1 d t 1

If to divide parties’ equation (119) by (118), then on the basis of (20) and (23) one will receive

(120) F 2 / 1 m / Δ t F 2 / 2 = m 2 / 1 m / Δ t m 0 ⋅ d t 2 d t 1 ⋅ d v 2 / 1 d v 2 / 2 = m 2 / 1 m / Δ t m 0 ( 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ) 3 / 2

On the basis of (103) relation between measurements of the same force by two different observers is obtained

(121) F 2 / 1 m / Δ t = ( 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ) ⋅ F 2 / 2

The highest value of force is measured by the observer from the inertial system in which the body is located.

5 The general form of dynamics

In presented examples, assumptions have been adopted which can be written in forms (30), (46), (68), (80) and (101). On this basis, it can be seen that the assumption for relativistic dynamics is as follows

(122) m 2 / 1 { a , b } d v 2 / 1 a d t 1 b = m 0 d v 2 / 2 a d t 2 b , a , b ∈ R

The physical meaning of the formula (122) depends on the value of the parameters a and b to be determined. For example, if a = b = 1, then this formula takes the form (29), equivalent to the form (30), from the first example.

On the basis of (20) and (23) one receives

(123) m 2 / 1 { a , b } d v 2 / 1 a d t 1 b = m 0 d v 2 / 1 a ( 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ) a ( 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ) b / 2 ⋅ d t 1 b = m 0 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 a + b / 2 d v 2 / 1 a d t 1 b

Markings are adopted

(124) { x } ≡ { a , b } ∧ x = a + b 2 ∈ R

Now on the basis of (123) the relativistic inertial mass of body in U2 system, seen from U1 system, when an assumption is fulfilled (122), is expressed in dynamics {x} by the following formula

(125) m 2 / 1 { x } = m 0 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 x

Each such relativistic mass defines a different relativistic dynamics.

According to presented examples, based on formulas (27) and (125), the momentum in dynamicsalign {x} is expressed by the following formula

(126) p 2 / 1 { x } = ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 d p 2 / 1 { x } = ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 m 2 / 1 { x } ⋅ d v 2 / 1 = m 0 ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 x d v 2 / 1
(127) p 2 / 1 { x } = m 0 c 2 x ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 1 ( c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 ) x d v 2 / 1

According to presented examples, based on formulas (28) and (125), the kinetic energy in dynamics {x} is expressed by the following formula

(128) E 2 / 1 { x } = ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 d E 2 / 1 { x } = ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 m 2 / 1 { x } ⋅ v 2 / 1 ⋅ d v 2 / 1 = m 0 ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 x v 2 / 1 d v 2 / 1
(129) E 2 / 1 { x } = m 0 c 2 x ∫ 0 v 2 / 1 v 2 / 1 ( c 2 − v 2 / 1 2 ) x d v 2 / 1

According to presented examples, based on formulas (24), (25) and (20), (23), the relation between forces in dynamics {x} is expressed by the following formula

(130) F 2 / 1 { x } F 2 / 2 = m 2 / 1 { x } d v 2 / 1 d t 1 m 0 d v 2 / 2 d t 2 = m 2 / 1 { x } d v 2 / 1 d t 1 m 0 d v 2 / 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ⋅ 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ⋅ d t 1 = m 2 / 1 { x } m 0 ( 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ) 3 / 2

On the basis of (125) one receives

(131) F 2 / 1 { x } F 2 / 2 = 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 x ( 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ) 3 / 2 = 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 x − 3 2

On the basis of (25) and (125) the Newton’s second law for dynamics {x} is obtained

(132) F 2 / 1 { x } = m 0 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 x a 2 / 1

6 Summary of dynamics

Summary derived formulas for momentum and kinetic energy:

Dynamics x = 0

(133) p 2 / 1 m = m 0 v 2 / 1
(134) E 2 / 1 m = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2

Dynamics x = 1/2

(135) p 2 / 1 m / Δ t = m 0 c ⋅ arcsin ⁡ v 2 / 1 c = m 0 v 2 / 1 arcsin ⁡ ( v 2 / 1 / c ) v 2 / 1 / c
(136) E 2 / 1 m / Δ t = m 0 c 2 ( 1 − 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ) = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2 2 1 + 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2

Dynamics x = 1

(137) p 2 / 1 Δ p = m 0 c 2 ln c + v 2 / 1 c − v 2 / 1 = m 0 v 2 / 1 ln c + v 2 / 1 c − v 2 / 1 c 2 v 2 / 1
(138) E 2 / 1 Δ p = m 0 c 2 2 ln ⁡ 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2 ln ⁡ 1 [ 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 ] ( c / v 2 / 1 ) 2

Dynamics x = 3/2 (recognized STR dynamics)

(139) p 2 / 1 F = m 0 v 2 / 1 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2
(140) E 2 / 1 F = m 0 c 2 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 − m 0 c 2 = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2 2 1 − v 2 / 1 2 c 2 1 + 1 − v 2 / 1 2 c 2

Dynamics x = 2

(141) p 2 / 1 F / Δ t = m 0 v 2 / 1 1 2 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 + ln c + v 2 / 1 c − v 2 / 1 c 2 v 2 / 1
(142) E 2 / 1 F / Δ t = m 0 c 2 2 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2 − m 0 c 2 2 = m 0 v 2 / 1 2 2 1 1 − ( v 2 / 1 / c ) 2

Figure 4 shows compared momentums from derived relativistic dynamics.

Figure 4 Module of the momentum in dynamics: STR/m (x=0), STR/m/Δt (x=1/2), STR/Δp (x=1), STR/F (x=3/2) and STR/F /Δt (x=2)
Figure 4

Module of the momentum in dynamics: STR/m (x=0), STR/m/Δt (x=1/2), STR/Δp (x=1), STR/F (x=3/2) and STR/F /Δt (x=2)

Figure 5 shows compared kinetic energies from derived relativistic dynamics.

Figure 5 Kinetic energies in dynamics: STR/m (x=0), STR/m/Δt (x=1/2), STR/Δp (x=1), STR/F (x=3/2) and STR/F /Δt (x=2)
Figure 5

Kinetic energies in dynamics: STR/m (x=0), STR/m/Δt (x=1/2), STR/Δp (x=1), STR/F (x=3/2) and STR/F /Δt (x=2)

Figure 6 shows relation between measurements of the same force from derived relativistic dynamics.

Figure 6 Relation between measurements of the same force by two different observers in dynamics: STR/m (x=0), STR/m/Δt (x=1/2), STR/Δp (x=1), STR/F (x=3/2) and STR/F /Δt (x=2)
Figure 6

Relation between measurements of the same force by two different observers in dynamics: STR/m (x=0), STR/m/Δt (x=1/2), STR/Δp (x=1), STR/F (x=3/2) and STR/F /Δt (x=2)

7 Even more general form of dynamics

Relation (125) to the relativistic mass can be even more generalized. In the general case, it is possible to assume that the relativistic mass is expressed by the following formula

(143) m 2 / 1 { f } = m 0 ⋅ f ( v 2 / 1 )

Where f(v2/1) is any continuous function with the following properties

(144) f ( v 2 / 1 ) ≥ 0
(145) f ( 0 ) = 1
(146) f ( v 2 / 1 ) = f ( − v 2 / 1 )

Each function f(v2/1) defines a different dynamics of the STR.

8 Final conclusions

This study presents the author’s method of deriving dynamics in the Special Theory of Relativity (STR). Five examples of such deriving were shown.

Derivation of dynamics is based on two formulas applicable in the kinematics of STR, i.e. (20) and (23). In order to derive the dynamics of STR, it is necessary to adopt an additional assumption in kinematics, which allows the concept of mass, kinetic energy and momentum to be introduced into the theory.

The dynamics of STR/F (x = 3/2) is nowadays recognized as the dynamics of the STR. It is based on the assumption that each force parallel to x-axis has the same value for the observer from each inertial frame of reference. Formally, however, other dynamics are possible in accordance with the kinematics of the STR. In order to derive them, it is necessary to base on a different assumption.

The currently accepted dynamics of STR has numerous experimental confirmations. However, it is not excluded that more accurate experiments designed specifically for this purpose will show that the optimal model is the dynamics for x = 3/2 ± Δx, where Δx is a noticeable correction. A calorimeter can be useful for verification of different dynamics. This device can measure the amount of heat released when stopping particles to high speed. On this basis, it is possible to determine graphs of the kinetic energy of accelerated particles (for example in accelerators of elementary particles) as a function of their velocity, analogous to those presented in Figure 5. On this basis, it is possible to indicate the dynamics in which the kinetic energy of particles is compatible with experiments.

The presented method of dynamism derivation can also be used in other theory of body kinematics. In the monograph [1] this method was used to derive four dynamics in the Special Theory of Ether, which are allowed for kinematics derived in the articles [4, 5]. The presented method is analogous to that used in another area, in the article [6].

References

[1] Szostek K., Szostek R., Special Theory of Ether, Publishing house AMELIA, Rzeszów, Poland, www.ste.com.pl 2015, ISBN 978-83-63359-81-2Search in Google Scholar

[2] Воднев В., Наумоич А., Наумович Н., Основньιе математические Формулы. Слравочник, 1988, Минск, Издательство «Вышэйшая шкода» Государственого комитета Бсср, ISBN 5-339-00083-4Search in Google Scholar

[3] Osiak Z., Energy in Special Relativity, Theoretical Physics, Isaac Scient. Publ., 2019, 4 (1), 22-25.10.22606/tp.2019.41002Search in Google Scholar

[4] Szostek K., Szostek R., The derivation of the general form of kinematics with the universal reference system, Res. Phys., 2018, 8, 429-437.10.1016/j.rinp.2017.12.053Search in Google Scholar

[5] Szostek K., Szostek R., Kinematics in Special Theory of Ether, Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull., 2018, 73 (4), 413-421.10.3103/S0027134918040136Search in Google Scholar

[6] Szostek R., An estimation of the geothermal energy sources for generating electricity, Springer, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering 324, Analysis and Simulation of Electrical and Computer, 2015, 127-133.10.1007/978-3-319-11248-0_10Search in Google Scholar
Received: 2018-05-19
Accepted: 2018-08-10
Published Online: 2019-04-13

© 2019 Roman Szostek, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Non-equilibrium Phase Transitions in 2D Small-World Networks: Competing Dynamics
  3. Harmonic waves solution in dual-phase-lag magneto-thermoelasticity
  4. Multiplicative topological indices of honeycomb derived networks
  5. Zagreb Polynomials and redefined Zagreb indices of nanostar dendrimers
  6. Solar concentrators manufacture and automation
  7. Idea of multi cohesive areas - foundation, current status and perspective
  8. Derivation method of numerous dynamics in the Special Theory of Relativity
  9. An application of Nwogu’s Boussinesq model to analyze the head-on collision process between hydroelastic solitary waves
  10. Competing Risks Model with Partially Step-Stress Accelerate Life Tests in Analyses Lifetime Chen Data under Type-II Censoring Scheme
  11. Group velocity mismatch at ultrashort electromagnetic pulse propagation in nonlinear metamaterials
  12. Investigating the impact of dissolved natural gas on the flow characteristics of multicomponent fluid in pipelines
  13. Analysis of impact load on tubing and shock absorption during perforating
  14. Energy characteristics of a nonlinear layer at resonant frequencies of wave scattering and generation
  15. Ion charge separation with new generation of nuclear emulsion films
  16. On the influence of water on fragmentation of the amino acid L-threonine
  17. Formulation of heat conduction and thermal conductivity of metals
  18. Displacement Reliability Analysis of Submerged Multi-body Structure’s Floating Body for Connection Gaps
  19. Deposits of iron oxides in the human globus pallidus
  20. Integrability, exact solutions and nonlinear dynamics of a nonisospectral integral-differential system
  21. Bounds for partition dimension of M-wheels
  22. Visual Analysis of Cylindrically Polarized Light Beams’ Focal Characteristics by Path Integral
  23. Analysis of repulsive central universal force field on solar and galactic dynamics
  24. Solitary Wave Solution of Nonlinear PDEs Arising in Mathematical Physics
  25. Understanding quantum mechanics: a review and synthesis in precise language
  26. Plane Wave Reflection in a Compressible Half Space with Initial Stress
  27. Evaluation of the realism of a full-color reflection H2 analog hologram recorded on ultra-fine-grain silver-halide material
  28. Graph cutting and its application to biological data
  29. Time fractional modified KdV-type equations: Lie symmetries, exact solutions and conservation laws
  30. Exact solutions of equal-width equation and its conservation laws
  31. MHD and Slip Effect on Two-immiscible Third Grade Fluid on Thin Film Flow over a Vertical Moving Belt
  32. Vibration Analysis of a Three-Layered FGM Cylindrical Shell Including the Effect Of Ring Support
  33. Hybrid censoring samples in assessment the lifetime performance index of Chen distributed products
  34. Study on the law of coal resistivity variation in the process of gas adsorption/desorption
  35. Mapping of Lineament Structures from Aeromagnetic and Landsat Data Over Ankpa Area of Lower Benue Trough, Nigeria
  36. Beta Generalized Exponentiated Frechet Distribution with Applications
  37. INS/gravity gradient aided navigation based on gravitation field particle filter
  38. Electrodynamics in Euclidean Space Time Geometries
  39. Dynamics and Wear Analysis of Hydraulic Turbines in Solid-liquid Two-phase Flow
  40. On Numerical Solution Of The Time Fractional Advection-Diffusion Equation Involving Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo Derivative
  41. New Complex Solutions to the Nonlinear Electrical Transmission Line Model
  42. The effects of quantum spectrum of 4 + n-dimensional water around a DNA on pure water in four dimensional universe
  43. Quantum Phase Estimation Algorithm for Finding Polynomial Roots
  44. Vibration Equation of Fractional Order Describing Viscoelasticity and Viscous Inertia
  45. The Errors Recognition and Compensation for the Numerical Control Machine Tools Based on Laser Testing Technology
  46. Evaluation and Decision Making of Organization Quality Specific Immunity Based on MGDM-IPLAO Method
  47. Key Frame Extraction of Multi-Resolution Remote Sensing Images Under Quality Constraint
  48. Influences of Contact Force towards Dressing Contiguous Sense of Linen Clothing
  49. Modeling and optimization of urban rail transit scheduling with adaptive fruit fly optimization algorithm
  50. The pseudo-limit problem existing in electromagnetic radiation transmission and its mathematical physics principle analysis
  51. Chaos synchronization of fractional–order discrete–time systems with different dimensions using two scaling matrices
  52. Stress Characteristics and Overload Failure Analysis of Cemented Sand and Gravel Dam in Naheng Reservoir
  53. A Big Data Analysis Method Based on Modified Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Algorithms
  54. Semi-supervised Classification Based Mixed Sampling for Imbalanced Data
  55. The Influence of Trading Volume, Market Trend, and Monetary Policy on Characteristics of the Chinese Stock Exchange: An Econophysics Perspective
  56. Estimation of sand water content using GPR combined time-frequency analysis in the Ordos Basin, China
  57. Special Issue Applications of Nonlinear Dynamics
  58. Discrete approximate iterative method for fuzzy investment portfolio based on transaction cost threshold constraint
  59. Multi-objective performance optimization of ORC cycle based on improved ant colony algorithm
  60. Information retrieval algorithm of industrial cluster based on vector space
  61. Parametric model updating with frequency and MAC combined objective function of port crane structure based on operational modal analysis
  62. Evacuation simulation of different flow ratios in low-density state
  63. A pointer location algorithm for computer visionbased automatic reading recognition of pointer gauges
  64. A cloud computing separation model based on information flow
  65. Optimizing model and algorithm for railway freight loading problem
  66. Denoising data acquisition algorithm for array pixelated CdZnTe nuclear detector
  67. Radiation effects of nuclear physics rays on hepatoma cells
  68. Special issue: XXVth Symposium on Electromagnetic Phenomena in Nonlinear Circuits (EPNC2018)
  69. A study on numerical integration methods for rendering atmospheric scattering phenomenon
  70. Wave propagation time optimization for geodesic distances calculation using the Heat Method
  71. Analysis of electricity generation efficiency in photovoltaic building systems made of HIT-IBC cells for multi-family residential buildings
  72. A structural quality evaluation model for three-dimensional simulations
  73. WiFi Electromagnetic Field Modelling for Indoor Localization
  74. Modeling Human Pupil Dilation to Decouple the Pupillary Light Reflex
  75. Principal Component Analysis based on data characteristics for dimensionality reduction of ECG recordings in arrhythmia classification
  76. Blinking Extraction in Eye gaze System for Stereoscopy Movies
  77. Optimization of screen-space directional occlusion algorithms
  78. Heuristic based real-time hybrid rendering with the use of rasterization and ray tracing method
  79. Review of muscle modelling methods from the point of view of motion biomechanics with particular emphasis on the shoulder
  80. The use of segmented-shifted grain-oriented sheets in magnetic circuits of small AC motors
  81. High Temperature Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine Analysis of Thermal Field
  82. Inverse approach for concentrated winding surface permanent magnet synchronous machines noiseless design
  83. An enameled wire with a semi-conductive layer: A solution for a better distibution of the voltage stresses in motor windings
  84. High temperature machines: topologies and preliminary design
  85. Aging monitoring of electrical machines using winding high frequency equivalent circuits
  86. Design of inorganic coils for high temperature electrical machines
  87. A New Concept for Deeper Integration of Converters and Drives in Electrical Machines: Simulation and Experimental Investigations
  88. Special Issue on Energetic Materials and Processes
  89. Investigations into the mechanisms of electrohydrodynamic instability in free surface electrospinning
  90. Effect of Pressure Distribution on the Energy Dissipation of Lap Joints under Equal Pre-tension Force
  91. Research on microstructure and forming mechanism of TiC/1Cr12Ni3Mo2V composite based on laser solid forming
  92. Crystallization of Nano-TiO2 Films based on Glass Fiber Fabric Substrate and Its Impact on Catalytic Performance
  93. Effect of Adding Rare Earth Elements Er and Gd on the Corrosion Residual Strength of Magnesium Alloy
  94. Closed-die Forging Technology and Numerical Simulation of Aluminum Alloy Connecting Rod
  95. Numerical Simulation and Experimental Research on Material Parameters Solution and Shape Control of Sandwich Panels with Aluminum Honeycomb
  96. Research and Analysis of the Effect of Heat Treatment on Damping Properties of Ductile Iron
  97. Effect of austenitising heat treatment on microstructure and properties of a nitrogen bearing martensitic stainless steel
  98. Special Issue on Fundamental Physics of Thermal Transports and Energy Conversions
  99. Numerical simulation of welding distortions in large structures with a simplified engineering approach
  100. Investigation on the effect of electrode tip on formation of metal droplets and temperature profile in a vibrating electrode electroslag remelting process
  101. Effect of North Wall Materials on the Thermal Environment in Chinese Solar Greenhouse (Part A: Experimental Researches)
  102. Three-dimensional optimal design of a cooled turbine considering the coolant-requirement change
  103. Theoretical analysis of particle size re-distribution due to Ostwald ripening in the fuel cell catalyst layer
  104. Effect of phase change materials on heat dissipation of a multiple heat source system
  105. Wetting properties and performance of modified composite collectors in a membrane-based wet electrostatic precipitator
  106. Implementation of the Semi Empirical Kinetic Soot Model Within Chemistry Tabulation Framework for Efficient Emissions Predictions in Diesel Engines
  107. Comparison and analyses of two thermal performance evaluation models for a public building
  108. A Novel Evaluation Method For Particle Deposition Measurement
  109. Effect of the two-phase hybrid mode of effervescent atomizer on the atomization characteristics
  110. Erratum
  111. Integrability analysis of the partial differential equation describing the classical bond-pricing model of mathematical finance
  112. Erratum to: Energy converting layers for thin-film flexible photovoltaic structures
https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2019-0016
Keywords for this article
dynamics of bodies; Special Theory of Relativity
Creative Commons
BY 4.0

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Non-equilibrium Phase Transitions in 2D Small-World Networks: Competing Dynamics
  3. Harmonic waves solution in dual-phase-lag magneto-thermoelasticity
  4. Multiplicative topological indices of honeycomb derived networks
  5. Zagreb Polynomials and redefined Zagreb indices of nanostar dendrimers
  6. Solar concentrators manufacture and automation
  7. Idea of multi cohesive areas - foundation, current status and perspective
  8. Derivation method of numerous dynamics in the Special Theory of Relativity
  9. An application of Nwogu’s Boussinesq model to analyze the head-on collision process between hydroelastic solitary waves
  10. Competing Risks Model with Partially Step-Stress Accelerate Life Tests in Analyses Lifetime Chen Data under Type-II Censoring Scheme
  11. Group velocity mismatch at ultrashort electromagnetic pulse propagation in nonlinear metamaterials
  12. Investigating the impact of dissolved natural gas on the flow characteristics of multicomponent fluid in pipelines
  13. Analysis of impact load on tubing and shock absorption during perforating
  14. Energy characteristics of a nonlinear layer at resonant frequencies of wave scattering and generation
  15. Ion charge separation with new generation of nuclear emulsion films
  16. On the influence of water on fragmentation of the amino acid L-threonine
  17. Formulation of heat conduction and thermal conductivity of metals
  18. Displacement Reliability Analysis of Submerged Multi-body Structure’s Floating Body for Connection Gaps
  19. Deposits of iron oxides in the human globus pallidus
  20. Integrability, exact solutions and nonlinear dynamics of a nonisospectral integral-differential system
  21. Bounds for partition dimension of M-wheels
  22. Visual Analysis of Cylindrically Polarized Light Beams’ Focal Characteristics by Path Integral
  23. Analysis of repulsive central universal force field on solar and galactic dynamics
  24. Solitary Wave Solution of Nonlinear PDEs Arising in Mathematical Physics
  25. Understanding quantum mechanics: a review and synthesis in precise language
  26. Plane Wave Reflection in a Compressible Half Space with Initial Stress
  27. Evaluation of the realism of a full-color reflection H2 analog hologram recorded on ultra-fine-grain silver-halide material
  28. Graph cutting and its application to biological data
  29. Time fractional modified KdV-type equations: Lie symmetries, exact solutions and conservation laws
  30. Exact solutions of equal-width equation and its conservation laws
  31. MHD and Slip Effect on Two-immiscible Third Grade Fluid on Thin Film Flow over a Vertical Moving Belt
  32. Vibration Analysis of a Three-Layered FGM Cylindrical Shell Including the Effect Of Ring Support
  33. Hybrid censoring samples in assessment the lifetime performance index of Chen distributed products
  34. Study on the law of coal resistivity variation in the process of gas adsorption/desorption
  35. Mapping of Lineament Structures from Aeromagnetic and Landsat Data Over Ankpa Area of Lower Benue Trough, Nigeria
  36. Beta Generalized Exponentiated Frechet Distribution with Applications
  37. INS/gravity gradient aided navigation based on gravitation field particle filter
  38. Electrodynamics in Euclidean Space Time Geometries
  39. Dynamics and Wear Analysis of Hydraulic Turbines in Solid-liquid Two-phase Flow
  40. On Numerical Solution Of The Time Fractional Advection-Diffusion Equation Involving Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo Derivative
  41. New Complex Solutions to the Nonlinear Electrical Transmission Line Model
  42. The effects of quantum spectrum of 4 + n-dimensional water around a DNA on pure water in four dimensional universe
  43. Quantum Phase Estimation Algorithm for Finding Polynomial Roots
  44. Vibration Equation of Fractional Order Describing Viscoelasticity and Viscous Inertia
  45. The Errors Recognition and Compensation for the Numerical Control Machine Tools Based on Laser Testing Technology
  46. Evaluation and Decision Making of Organization Quality Specific Immunity Based on MGDM-IPLAO Method
  47. Key Frame Extraction of Multi-Resolution Remote Sensing Images Under Quality Constraint
  48. Influences of Contact Force towards Dressing Contiguous Sense of Linen Clothing
  49. Modeling and optimization of urban rail transit scheduling with adaptive fruit fly optimization algorithm
  50. The pseudo-limit problem existing in electromagnetic radiation transmission and its mathematical physics principle analysis
  51. Chaos synchronization of fractional–order discrete–time systems with different dimensions using two scaling matrices
  52. Stress Characteristics and Overload Failure Analysis of Cemented Sand and Gravel Dam in Naheng Reservoir
  53. A Big Data Analysis Method Based on Modified Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Algorithms
  54. Semi-supervised Classification Based Mixed Sampling for Imbalanced Data
  55. The Influence of Trading Volume, Market Trend, and Monetary Policy on Characteristics of the Chinese Stock Exchange: An Econophysics Perspective
  56. Estimation of sand water content using GPR combined time-frequency analysis in the Ordos Basin, China
  57. Special Issue Applications of Nonlinear Dynamics
  58. Discrete approximate iterative method for fuzzy investment portfolio based on transaction cost threshold constraint
  59. Multi-objective performance optimization of ORC cycle based on improved ant colony algorithm
  60. Information retrieval algorithm of industrial cluster based on vector space
  61. Parametric model updating with frequency and MAC combined objective function of port crane structure based on operational modal analysis
  62. Evacuation simulation of different flow ratios in low-density state
  63. A pointer location algorithm for computer visionbased automatic reading recognition of pointer gauges
  64. A cloud computing separation model based on information flow
  65. Optimizing model and algorithm for railway freight loading problem
  66. Denoising data acquisition algorithm for array pixelated CdZnTe nuclear detector
  67. Radiation effects of nuclear physics rays on hepatoma cells
  68. Special issue: XXVth Symposium on Electromagnetic Phenomena in Nonlinear Circuits (EPNC2018)
  69. A study on numerical integration methods for rendering atmospheric scattering phenomenon
  70. Wave propagation time optimization for geodesic distances calculation using the Heat Method
  71. Analysis of electricity generation efficiency in photovoltaic building systems made of HIT-IBC cells for multi-family residential buildings
  72. A structural quality evaluation model for three-dimensional simulations
  73. WiFi Electromagnetic Field Modelling for Indoor Localization
  74. Modeling Human Pupil Dilation to Decouple the Pupillary Light Reflex
  75. Principal Component Analysis based on data characteristics for dimensionality reduction of ECG recordings in arrhythmia classification
  76. Blinking Extraction in Eye gaze System for Stereoscopy Movies
  77. Optimization of screen-space directional occlusion algorithms
  78. Heuristic based real-time hybrid rendering with the use of rasterization and ray tracing method
  79. Review of muscle modelling methods from the point of view of motion biomechanics with particular emphasis on the shoulder
  80. The use of segmented-shifted grain-oriented sheets in magnetic circuits of small AC motors
  81. High Temperature Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine Analysis of Thermal Field
  82. Inverse approach for concentrated winding surface permanent magnet synchronous machines noiseless design
  83. An enameled wire with a semi-conductive layer: A solution for a better distibution of the voltage stresses in motor windings
  84. High temperature machines: topologies and preliminary design
  85. Aging monitoring of electrical machines using winding high frequency equivalent circuits
  86. Design of inorganic coils for high temperature electrical machines
  87. A New Concept for Deeper Integration of Converters and Drives in Electrical Machines: Simulation and Experimental Investigations
  88. Special Issue on Energetic Materials and Processes
  89. Investigations into the mechanisms of electrohydrodynamic instability in free surface electrospinning
  90. Effect of Pressure Distribution on the Energy Dissipation of Lap Joints under Equal Pre-tension Force
  91. Research on microstructure and forming mechanism of TiC/1Cr12Ni3Mo2V composite based on laser solid forming
  92. Crystallization of Nano-TiO2 Films based on Glass Fiber Fabric Substrate and Its Impact on Catalytic Performance
  93. Effect of Adding Rare Earth Elements Er and Gd on the Corrosion Residual Strength of Magnesium Alloy
  94. Closed-die Forging Technology and Numerical Simulation of Aluminum Alloy Connecting Rod
  95. Numerical Simulation and Experimental Research on Material Parameters Solution and Shape Control of Sandwich Panels with Aluminum Honeycomb
  96. Research and Analysis of the Effect of Heat Treatment on Damping Properties of Ductile Iron
  97. Effect of austenitising heat treatment on microstructure and properties of a nitrogen bearing martensitic stainless steel
  98. Special Issue on Fundamental Physics of Thermal Transports and Energy Conversions
  99. Numerical simulation of welding distortions in large structures with a simplified engineering approach
  100. Investigation on the effect of electrode tip on formation of metal droplets and temperature profile in a vibrating electrode electroslag remelting process
  101. Effect of North Wall Materials on the Thermal Environment in Chinese Solar Greenhouse (Part A: Experimental Researches)
  102. Three-dimensional optimal design of a cooled turbine considering the coolant-requirement change
  103. Theoretical analysis of particle size re-distribution due to Ostwald ripening in the fuel cell catalyst layer
  104. Effect of phase change materials on heat dissipation of a multiple heat source system
  105. Wetting properties and performance of modified composite collectors in a membrane-based wet electrostatic precipitator
  106. Implementation of the Semi Empirical Kinetic Soot Model Within Chemistry Tabulation Framework for Efficient Emissions Predictions in Diesel Engines
  107. Comparison and analyses of two thermal performance evaluation models for a public building
  108. A Novel Evaluation Method For Particle Deposition Measurement
  109. Effect of the two-phase hybrid mode of effervescent atomizer on the atomization characteristics
  110. Erratum
  111. Integrability analysis of the partial differential equation describing the classical bond-pricing model of mathematical finance
  112. Erratum to: Energy converting layers for thin-film flexible photovoltaic structures
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2019-0016/html
Scroll to top button