Home Effect of pre-slaughter weight on morphological composition of pig carcasses
Article Open Access

Effect of pre-slaughter weight on morphological composition of pig carcasses

  • Oleksandr Mykhalko EMAIL logo , Mykola Povod , Tetyana Verbelchuk , Olena Shcherbyna , Ruslan Susol , Natalia Kirovich and Igor Riznychuk
Published/Copyright: May 3, 2022

Abstract

To achieve the goals of our study, we investigated the relationship between morphological composition of pig carcasses and their pre-slaughter weight. In this research, 60 pigs were reared for fattening under the identical conditions of keeping and feeding, then slaughtered and sampled with pre-slaughter weight 110 and 120 kg. The content of meat, fat, and bones and their ratio in carcasses were evaluated. The probable influence of the factor of pre-slaughter weight on the share of meat in certain parts of the carcass is established 61.96% for the cervical-scapular third, 62.21% for the lumbosacral third, and 96.57% for the pelvic-femoral thirds. It has been found that in pigs at slaughter weight 120 kg for each additional increase in fat content by 1.0 kg, the meat content was proportionally insufficient by 0.43 kg in the cervical-scapular third and by 0.39 kg in the pelvic-femoral third of the carcass. In peers weighing 110 kg, each additional 1 kg of fat did not allow to gain 0.72 kg of meat in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass. The study shows that pigs fattening up to 110 kg of its carcass is more sensitive (44.99%) to changes in meat–fat ratios in the cervical-scapular third, which allows more targeted formation of the characteristics of semi-finished products of this part at this stage. Slaughter weight management can improve the quality of pork.

1 Introduction

Meat is one of the most important human protein foods. The universality and uniqueness of pig muscle tissue include high energy consumption, balanced amino acid composition of proteins, and biologically active substances. Together, it ensures a normal physiological state and absorption of nutrients by the human body. Meat contains all the substances necessary for human nutrition [1].

Nowadays, due to growing demand for pork, the research studies are particularly directed on increase in production of pork by industrial high-intensive technologies [2,3,4]. At the same time, pig farming is dominated by a tendency to increase the production of lean pork with increasing pre-slaughter weight of pigs [5,6,7,8]. However, as the pre-slaughter weight of pigs in their carcasses often increases, so does the meat and bone content and the amount of fat [9]. With increasing fattening time, there is a decrease in the proportion of muscle tissue, increase in connective tissue, and deterioration of the ratio of intramuscular fat. Some studies reported an increase in the percentage of lean meat in those studies that used a higher starting body weight than other studies [10].

A similar statement [11] indicates that when the carcass weight of pigs increased, the bone content in the carcass relatively decreased, and the fat content increased. There was no clear trend in this study regarding the dependence of meat content on pre-slaughter weight. The published article indicates that during the growth of carcass weight and weight of all its anatomical components there was a deterioration in the ratio of muscle, bone and fat in the morphological structure of the carcass [12].

Previous studies [13] have shown a tendency to a gradual proportional increase in the weight of all parts of pig carcasses in parallel with the increase in pre-slaughter weight of animals. These studies [13] also showed that all other semi-finished products with increasing pre-slaughter weight of animals also increased in weight, and the composition of pig carcasses depends more on pre-slaughter weight than on other factors. Other publications have reported that the slaughter of pigs with a pre-slaughter weight of 120 kg showed a significant reduction in the meat content of their carcasses compared with carcasses of pigs slaughtered weighing 100 and 110 kg [14]. Our recent studies have shown a significant dependence of carcass quality, meat, adipose tissue, and bone content on pig pre-slaughter weight [15].

The report demonstrates [16] slight differences in the effect of pigs sex, no genotype influence, and a significant effect of pre-slaughter weight on the morphological composition of pig carcasses and noted that the absolute yield of boneless meat increased, whereas its percentage decreased with increasing carcass weight. up to 160 kg. Backfat depth, carcass length, ham, and shoulder weights increased (p < 0.001) as pre-slaughter weight increased from 116 to 133 kg [17].

The pig sex did not have a significant effect on the morphological composition of the carcass, and the increase in pre-slaughter weight increased the fat content and decreased the content of bones and meat [18].

However, a study [19] comparing the effect of the breed and the level of feeding at the same pre-slaughter weight showed that the meat content of the carcass depends more on the breed.

Some researchers [20] found that the slaughter of overweight pigs resulted in a decrease in the proportion of skin, whereas the proportion of muscle, fat, and bone tissue remained relatively constant.

According to studies [21], it was found that to increase the meat content piglets should not be allowed to overfeed for fattening, as this reduces the slaughter yield and increases the thickness of the lard. Contrary to her findings, other researchers [22] did not establish a statistical relationship between meat and pre-slaughter weight of pigs in 100, 115, 130, and 145 kg, but found that its growth increased slaughter yield, but decreased feed digestion rate, resulting in increase in the cost of production.

Another study [23] concluded that pigs do not reach the weight threshold when they become constantly fatter or more muscular, due to a weak or negative correlation between fat depth and predicted muscle tissue yield, as well as between muscle depth and the predicted yield of muscle mass. Known publications [24] pointed out the lack of significant effect of pre-slaughter weight on the fat content in the carcass.

A more in-depth study of the effect of pre-slaughter weight on the morphological composition of pig carcasses is an urgent problem of the general vector of research to improve the efficiency of pork production, especially in modern conditions of widespread use of different pig genotypes at industrial farms.

The purpose of this study is to research the degree of influence of pre-slaughter weight of fattening young animals on fluctuations in the morphological composition of pig carcasses.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Experimental site

To achieve the goal of this research, we conducted an experiment to study the relationship between the morphological composition of pig carcasses and their pre-slaughter weight on the basis of the fattening farm of Globinsky Pig Complex LLC, Poltava region, Ukraine.

2.2 Experimental establishment

2.2.1 Animals

Pigs obtained from hybrid sows (F 1) from a cross between Irish Ladras and Yorkshire, which were inseminated with boar semen from the Max Gro synthetic terminal line, were taken. A group of 300 pigs with an equal number of gilts and barrows was formed from the selected animals and put to fattening at the age of 70 days.

  1. Ethical approval: We used adequate methods and everything possible during the experiment to reduce pain or suffering in the experimental pigs. Research was conducted in compliance with the European animal ethics’ recommendations [27]. All used experimental methods were agreed by the Sumy National Agrarian University Bioethics Commission “For animal care and use in scientific (Experimental) research” (No BT-21-1027-01). Animals were treated during the experiment in accordance with the requirements of the Ukraine’s Law No 3447- IV, 2006, on protecting animals from brutal treatment [28].

2.2.2 Rearing conditions and feeding

During the fattening period, the population of 60 pigs were raised in identical conditions in group pens of 40 m2 each, on a completely slotted concrete floor with a liquid type of feeding with complete rations. During fattening, pigs used liquid-type feed of two recipes (Table 1). Pigs weighing 110 kg were kept in the amount of 60 heads per pen. From this number, 30 animals were selected for slaughter. In the group with a slaughter weight of 110 kg, there were 30 pigs, of which 15 were gilts and 15 were barrows. Pigs weighing 120 kg were kept in the amount of 60 heads per pen. From this number, 30 animals were selected for slaughter. There were 30 pigs in the group with a slaughter weight of 120 kg, of which 15 were gilts and 15 were barrows.

Table 1

Nutritional value of feed for the first and second stages of fattening

Indicator The first period of fattening: 30–60 kg The second period of fattening: 60–130 kg
Assimilable energy (MJ/kg) 14 13.5
Protein (%) 18 17
Lysine (%) 1.15 1
Oil (%) 2.95 2.7
Fiber (%) 4.0 4.5
Calcium (%) 0.68 0.65
Assimilable phosphorus (%) 0.33 0.3
Total phosphorus (%) 0.58 0.55
Vitamin A (IU/kg) 10,000 10,000
Vitamin D (IU/kg) 2,000 2,000
Vitamin E (IU/kg) 100 100
Biotin (μg/kg) 100 100
The ratio of water to feed 2.8:1 3:1

2.2.3 Sampling

When the animals reached an average weight of 110 and 120 kg, they were weighed individually. According to the results of this weighing, 60 heads were selected for control slaughter with a weight of 110 and 120 kg. All procedures followed [25] the protection of animals used in research and other scientific endeavors. After 24 h of fasting, the control slaughter was carried out according to the generally accepted method in the slaughterhouse of the Globinsky Meat Factory LLC, Poltava region, Ukraine. During slaughter, the carcass was divided into three parts according to the appropriate anatomical scheme:

  1. Cervical-scapular third of the carcass – incision from the first cervical vertebra to a straight line between the fifth and sixth thoracic vertebrae, crossing the ribs behind the scapula;

  2. Dorsal-lumbar third of the carcass – incision from the line of separation of the anterior part to the straight line passing between the last and penultimate lumbar vertebrae directly in front of the pelvis;

  3. Pelvic-femoral third of the carcass – incision along the line of separation of the middle part to the line of separation of the shin. The weight of each part of the carcass was determined by weighing, and after their deboning, the mass of morphological components: meat, fat, and bones; their percentage and ratio were calculated.

After slaughter, the carcasses were cooled for 24 h at a temperature of 2.0–4.0°C. When deboning the carcasses, the morphological composition of carcasses, yield of meat, lard, bones, and their ratio to each other and to the weight of the carcass were determined in accordance with international standard [26].

2.3 Statistical analysis

The obtained results were analyzed statistically (Excel 2010) on the grounds of generally accepted statistical methods with single-factor variance analysis. When using the method of one-factor analysis of variance, we took into account the influence of the slaughter weight factor. Factors that did not fall within the scope of our research were considered not taken into account in accordance with the calculation methodology. These are microclimatic indicators in the room, seasonal factors, age of animals, method of castration, sex, technological features of feeding equipment, method of feeding, parameters of holding machines, method of manure removal and others. The dissemblance significance (p ≤ 0.05, p ≤ 0.01) between the indicators of morphological composition of carcasses (n = 60) was analyzed by Student’s t-test. In addition, a linear least squares mathematical model was used to estimate the correlation between the actual features and the dependent parameters of the carcass.

3 Results

The results of the study (Table 2) suggest that the meat content in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass was 2.20 kg or 11.61% (p < 0.001) higher in pigs with a pre-slaughter weight of 120 kg compared with analogues slaughtered for a weight of 110 kg. No significant difference in the content of fat and bones in the carcasses of animals of the experimental groups was found.

Table 2

Distribution of morphological composition of the cervical-scapular third of the carcass of pigs of the experimental groups (n = 60)

Indicators Group I (110 kg) Group II (120 kg) p-value
Meat content (kg) 13.7 ± 0.22 15.9 ± 0.24 ***
Fat content (kg) 7.3 ± 0.22 7.7 ± 0.27 NS
Bone content (kg) 3.8 ± 0.06 3.9 ± 0.08 NS
Proportion of meat in carcass (%) 17.3 ± 0.26 18.4 ± 0.20 ***
The proportion of fat in carcass (%) 9.1 ± 0.27 8.9 ± 0.29 NS
The proportion of bones in carcass (%) 4.7 ± 0.08 4.6 ± 0.11 NS

***p < 0.001, NS – not significant.

Animals weighing 120 kg also outperformed their analogues with 110 kg carcass weight in the proportion of meat in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass by 1.10% (p < 0.001). No probable divergence was obtained in the proportion of fat and bones between animals of the groups.

The composition of the dorsal-lumbar third of the carcasses (Table 3) was marked by significantly higher values of meat, fat, and bones in animals slaughtered at a pre-slaughter weight of 120 kg than their counterparts at a slaughter weight of 110 kg by 2.9 kg or 17.37% (p < 0.001), 0.5 kg or 13.16% (p < 0.05), and 0.3 kg or 7.32% (p < 0.01), respectively.

Table 3

Distribution of morphological composition of the dorsal-lumbar third of the carcass of pigs of the experimental groups (n = 60)

Indicators Group I (110 kg) Group II (120 kg) p-value
Meat content (kg) 16.7 ± 0.23 19.6 ± 0.50 ***
Fat content (kg) 3.8 ± 0.14 4.3 ± 0.19 *
Bone content (kg) 4.1 ± 0.08 4.4 ± 0.10 **
Proportion of meat in carcass (%) 21.1 ± 0.26 22.6 ± 0.39 ***
The proportion of fat in carcass (%) 4.8 ± 0.16 5.1 ± 0.27 NS
The proportion of bones in carcass (%) 5.1 ± 0.11 5.1 ± 0.13 NS

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, NS – not significant.

The livestock of the control group I, which was sent for slaughter at 110 kg, was probably inferior to the analogues of the experimental group II in terms of the share of meat by 1.5% (p < 0.001) in the dorsal-lumbar third of the carcass. At the same time, statistically significant differences between animals of both groups were not found in terms of the proportion of fat and the proportion of bones in this third of carcasses.

Pigs fattened to a weight of 120 kg had a higher meat content by 1.5 kg or 8.02% (p < 0.001) and a higher bone content by 0.40 kg or 14.81% (p < 0.001) in the pelvic-femoral third of the carcass compared to analogues fattened to a weight of 110 kg. According to the indicator of fat content in the carcasses of animals of the control and experimental groups, there was no significant difference (Table 4).

Table 4

Distribution of morphological composition in the pelvic-femoral third of the carcass of pigs of the experimental groups (n = 60)

Indicators Group I (110 kg) Group II (120 kg) p-value
Meat content (kg) 18.7 ± 0.20 20.2 ± 0.42 ***
Fat content (kg) 5.1 ± 0.12 5.2 ± 0.19 NS
Bone content (kg) 2.7 ± 0.04 3.1 ± 0.08 ***
Proportion of meat in carcass (%) 23.6 ± 0.21 23.2 ± 0.38 NS
The proportion of fat in carcass (%) 6.4 ± 0.14 6.9 ± 0.18 *
The proportion of bones in carcass (%) 3.4 ± 0.05 3.5 ± 0.11 NS

*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS – not significant.

A study of the ratio of fat to bone in the pelvic-femoral third of the carcasses did not reveal a significant difference between the carcasses of animals with different pre-slaughter weight in terms of meat and bones. However, the proportion of fat was probably higher by 0.5 kg or 7.81% (p < 0.05) in this third of the carcasses of pigs slaughtered at 120 kg relative to the other pigs slaughtered at 110 kg.

The performed one-factor analysis of variance revealed a significant influence of factors on the morphological composition of the thirds of pig carcasses (Figure 1). The influence of pre-slaughter weight factor on the share of meat, fat, and bones in the cervical-scapular third of carcasses was set at: 61.96% on the share of meat in carcasses, 96.32% on the share of fat in carcasses, and 94.29% on the proportion of bones in carcasses. The probable influence of unaccounted factors on the proportion of meat in the carcass was also found to be 38.04%, whereas the other proportions of fat and bones were not significantly affected by these factors.

Figure 1 
               The strength of the influence of slaughter weight factor on the morphological composition of pig carcasses (source is own calculations).
Figure 1

The strength of the influence of slaughter weight factor on the morphological composition of pig carcasses (source is own calculations).

The probable influence of carcass weight on the change of indicators of the dorsal-lumbar third of the carcasses is established. The share of meat in the dorsal-lumbar part of the carcass probably depended on both the pre-slaughter weight by 62.21% and unaccounted for factors by 37.79%. Although the share of fat and bones in the carcass was not affected by unaccounted factors, the carcass weight affected these indicators with a strength of 98.28 and 99.99%, respectively.

The study found a significant effect of weight categories on the shares of meat, fat, and bones at 96.57, 85.66, and 97.60%, respectively, in the pelvic-femoral third of the carcass. At the same time, the proportion of fat in this third of the carcass in parallel had a probable effect and unaccounted for factors at the level of 14.34%.

The study found that pigs slaughtered at a weight 120 kg had a higher meat content in the carcass by 6.6 kg or 13.44% (p < 0.001) compared to analogues slaughtered at a weight of 110 kg. But according to the indicators of the amount of fat and bones in their carcasses, no difference was found (Table 5).

Table 5

Body composition of pig carcasses of experimental groups (n = 60)

Indicators Group I (110 kg) Group II (120 kg) p-value
Meat content (kg) 49.1 ± 0.41 55.7 ± 1.01 ***
Fat content (kg) 16.3 ± 0.38 17.3 ± 0.61 NS
Bone content (kg) 10.5 ± 0.16 11.0 ± 0.43 NS
Proportion of meat in carcass (%) 61.9 ± 0.36 64.2 ± 0.68 **
The proportion of fat in carcass (%) 21.0 ± 0.44 21.9 ± 0.68 NS
The proportion of bones in carcass (%) 13.3 ± 0.23 12.9 ± 0.44 NS

**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, NS – not significant.

The share of meat in pig carcasses was higher in the carcasses of the experimental animals compared with control analogues by 2.3 kg or 3.72% (p < 0.01). At the same time, in the carcasses of pigs slaughtered weighing 120 and 110 kg, there was no significant difference in the proportion of fat and the proportion of bones in them.

The study of the ratio of morphological components of pig carcasses showed in animals at pre-slaughter weight of 110 kg: higher meat yield per 1 kg of lard, higher bone yield per 1 kg of meat, and higher bone yield per 1 kg of lard (Table 6) compared with the carcasses of animals slaughtered at 120 kg.

Table 6

The ratio of morphological components of pig carcasses (kg) (n = 60)

Indicators Group I (110 kg) Group II (120 kg)
Meat/1 kg of fat 0.33:1 0.31:1
Meat/1 kg of bones 4.67:1 4.79:1
Fat/1 kg of meat 3.01:1 3.21:1
Fat/1 kg of bones 1.55:1 1.57:1
Bones/1 kg of meat 0.21:1 0.19:1
Bones/1 kg of fat 0.64:1 0.63:1

At the same time, animals at a pre-slaughter weight of 120 kg predominated in the ratio: meat per 1 kg of bones, fat per 1 kg of meat, and fat per 1 kg of bones in the carcasses of analogues slaughtered at a weight 110 kg.

We established the nature of the relationship between meat and fat content in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass of pigs slaughtered at a weight of 120 kg using the statistical method of constructing a two-dimensional linear mathematical least squares model (Table 7). As a result, the pairwise correlation coefficient showed a moderate (0.3 < r xy120 < 0.5), inverse (r xy120 < 0) and statistically significant (F 120 > F crit120) relationship between meat and fat content in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass of pigs slaughtered at a weight of 120 kg. This indicates that as the content of meat increases in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass, the fat content in it moderately decreases.

Table 7

Statistical data of a two-dimensional linear mathematical model by the method of least squares

Indicators Cervical-scapular third of the carcass Dorsal-lumbar third of the carcass Pelvic-femoral third of the carcass
Group I (110 kg) Group II (120 kg) Group I (110 kg) Group II (120 kg) Group I (110 kg) Group II (120 kg)
F critical 0.3145 0.3145 3.1788 3.1788 3.1788 3.1788
F 0.9356 0.4709 2.5193 1.9966 2.1671 7.0841
Pairwise correlation coefficient, r x,y −0.7031 −0.2949 −0.3726 −0.1186 −0.1031 −0.6853
Coefficient of determination, R 2 0.4944 0.0870 0.1389 0.0141 0.0106 0.4696

At the same time, the relationship between the meat content and the fat content of the cervical-scapular third of the carcass of animals slaughtered at a weight of 110 kg was high (0.7 < r xy110 < 0.9), inverse (r xy110 < 0), and statistically significant (F 110 > F crit110). The strong feedback between indicators shows that when the average live weight of 110 kg is reached, gaining weight because of the increase in the fat content in the carcass reduces the potential meat component more intensively and vice versa.

The analysis suggests a potentially weak (0.1 < r xy120 < 0.3) and statistically insignificant (F 120 < F crit120) correlation between muscle tissue content and fat content in the dorsal-lumbar third of pig carcasses slaughtered at 120 kg. The closeness of the linear relationship between these indicators of the dorsal-lumbar third of the carcass for animals with pre-slaughter weight 110 kg was moderate (0.3 < r xy120 < 0.5), but also did not gain statistical significance (F 110 < F crit110).

The study found a reliable (F 120 > F crit120), high (0.7 < r xy120 < 0.9), inverse (r xy120 < 0) relationship between indicators of meat and fat content in the pelvic-femoral third in the carcass of pigs slaughtered at a weight 120 kg. The structure of the pelvic-femoral third of the carcass of the 120 kg weight category of animals is more sensitive to the factors that stimulate the intensive growth of salinity, and also, the manifestation of this direction of carcass development is characterized by a high simultaneous decrease in its meat content. At the same time, the relationship between meat content and fat content in the pelvic-femoral third of the carcass of animals slaughtered at 110 kg was weak (0.1 < r xy110 < 0.3), inverse (r xy110 < 0), and not statistically significant (F 110 < F crit110).

Estimation of the coefficient of determination by the established inverse dependence shows that 8.70% of the variance of the effective trait of meat content is due to a change in the factor fat content in the cervical-scapular third of carcass for pigs with a pre-slaughter weight of 120 kg, and the rest caused by random factors (Figure 2).

Figure 2 
               Linear approximation of the dependence of meat content on fat content in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass at a pre-slaughter weight of 120 kg.
Figure 2

Linear approximation of the dependence of meat content on fat content in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass at a pre-slaughter weight of 120 kg.

The inverse linear regression coefficient shows that for each increase in the fat content in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass at a pre-slaughter weight of 120 kg per 1.0 kg, the meat content will decrease proportionally by 0.43 kg (Figure 2). In the dorsal-lumbar part of the carcass, the value of the coefficient of determination was statistically incredible (Figure 3).

Figure 3 
               Linear approximation of the dependence of the meat content on the fat content in the dorsal-lumbar third of the carcass at a slaughter weight of 120 kg.
Figure 3

Linear approximation of the dependence of the meat content on the fat content in the dorsal-lumbar third of the carcass at a slaughter weight of 120 kg.

A study of the coefficient of determination with a confirmed inverse relationship suggests that 46.96% of the change in meat content is caused by a change in the content of fat in the pelvic-femoral third of the carcasses of animals slaughtered at 120 kg. Analysis of the mathematical expression of the relationship between these indicators of pig meat shows that with an increase in fat content by 1 kg, the meat content will decrease in the hip third of the carcass by 0.39 kg (Figure 4).

Figure 4 
               Linear approximation of the dependence of meat content on fat content in the pelvic-femoral third of the carcass at a slaughter weight of 120 kg.
Figure 4

Linear approximation of the dependence of meat content on fat content in the pelvic-femoral third of the carcass at a slaughter weight of 120 kg.

The value of the coefficient of determination with the established inverse relationship shows that the change in meat content is due to changes in the fat content in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass for pigs with slaughter weight 110 kg by 49.44%, and the rest is caused by random factors (Figure 5).

Figure 5 
               Linear approximation of the dependence of meat content on fat content in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass at a slaughter weight of 110 kg.
Figure 5

Linear approximation of the dependence of meat content on fat content in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass at a slaughter weight of 110 kg.

In the dorsal-lumbar and pelvic-femoral parts of the carcass, no reliable value of the coefficient of determination has been established (Figures 6 and 7).

Figure 6 
               Linear approximation of the dependence of the meat content on the fat content in the dorsal-lumbar third of the carcass at a slaughter weight 110 kg.
Figure 6

Linear approximation of the dependence of the meat content on the fat content in the dorsal-lumbar third of the carcass at a slaughter weight 110 kg.

Figure 7 
               Linear approximation of the dependence of meat content on fat content in the pelvic-femoral third of the carcass at a slaughter weight of 110 kg.
Figure 7

Linear approximation of the dependence of meat content on fat content in the pelvic-femoral third of the carcass at a slaughter weight of 110 kg.

The parameters of the inverse linear regression equation show that for each increase in the fat content in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass at a pre-slaughter weight of 110 kg per 1.0 kg, the meat content of animal carcasses will decrease proportionally by 0.72 kg (Figure 7).

The carcass weight significantly affected the meat content in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass by 61.9%, where the correlation was lineal, inverse, and weak (−0.33), and the meat content decreased by 0.44% with an increase in pre-slaughter weight by 1% (Figure 8).

Figure 8 
               Linear approximation of the dependence of meat content on pre-slaughter weight in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass.
Figure 8

Linear approximation of the dependence of meat content on pre-slaughter weight in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass.

In the dorsal-lumbar third of the carcass, the meat content significantly depended on the pre-slaughter weight by 62.2%, and the correlation was lineal, direct, and weak (0.37); the meat content increased by 0.24% with an increase in slaughter weight by 1% (Figure 9).

Figure 9 
               Linear approximation of the dependence of meat content on pre-slaughter weight in the dorsal-lumbar third of the carcass.
Figure 9

Linear approximation of the dependence of meat content on pre-slaughter weight in the dorsal-lumbar third of the carcass.

In the pelvic-femoral third of carcass, the carcass weight affected the meat content by 96.6%, and the correlation was lineal, inverse, and weak (−0.36); the meat content decreased by 0.20% with an increase in the carcass weight per 1% (Figure 10).

Figure 10 
               Linear approximation of the dependence of meat content on pre-slaughter weight in the pelvic-femoral third of the carcass.
Figure 10

Linear approximation of the dependence of meat content on pre-slaughter weight in the pelvic-femoral third of the carcass.

4 Discussion

The results of our research confirmed the conclusions of other authors [9,17] on the increase in the amount of fat with increasing pre-slaughter weight, confirmed the previously published judgment [9,11] on the reduction of the proportion of bones at higher slaughter weight, and confirmed previous arguments [14,16] on the significant dependence of the morphological composition of pig carcasses on pre-slaughter weight compared with other factors.

However, our results contradict the reported scientific arguments [9] on the reduction of meat content with increasing pre-slaughter weight, contradict the announced research data [11] on the lack of reliable dependence of meat content on live weight of pigs before slaughter, contradict the reported conclusions [14] about a significant reduction in the meat content of 120 kg pigs compared to the meat content of analogues weighing 110 kg, and contradict the scientific report [19] on the reliable dependence of pig carcass meat on the breed than on the pre-slaughter weight.

Slaughter weight of pigs had a significant (p < 0.05) effect on the characteristics of carcasses [29], accounting for most of the observed differences in the experiments [30]. In particular, scientists [31] found that because of the increase in carcass weight, the carcass yield also increased (p < 0.001), but the meat yield decreased (p < 0.05). At the same time, scientific studies [32] reported about a decrease in lean meat yield by 0.16% for every 1 kg increase in carcass weight from 110 to 140 kg, which does not coincide with our increase in meat content by 0.37% for each 1 kg increase in pre-slaughter weight from 110 to 120 kg. In addition, other authors indicate that the percentage of meat yield to the total carcass weight increased by 0.37% for every 10 kg of live weight with an increase in pre-slaughter weight (p < 0.001), which is much lower than our results [33].

Published research [11] noted the practical equality of the output of meat from the carcasses of animals weighing 100 and 110 kg. But at a higher weight of 120 kg, the meat content of carcasses decreased by 1.4% with an increase in fat yield by 2.9%. We found that the meat content in pig carcasses increased by 3.72% with increasing pre-slaughter weight to 120 kg. This coincides with other scientific work [34], which states that the mass of all tissues increased (p < 0.01) when the pre-slaughter weight grew. Reported studies [34] coincide with our conclusions on that the level of muscle content in the lumbosacral third and in pelvic third of the carcass climbed up with increasing carcass weight from 110 to 120 kg.

In some experiments [35,36], it was found that when the carcass weight increased to 125 kg, the specific weight of bones in carcasses decreased in all experimental pig groups by 0.3–0.6%. The authors also noted a decrease in the ratio of lard to meat in the range of 0.46–0.61 at slaughter of 100 kg and 0.49–0.70 at slaughter of 125 kg. However, we did not establish a relationship between bone content and pre-slaughter weight, and the tendency to decrease the ratio of lard to meat with increasing pre-slaughter weight was not confirmed and the ratio was increasing in our experiment.

According to published articles [37], the proportions of meat and fat in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass decreased linearly (p < 0.001), and in the lumbar third of the carcass, it increased linearly (p < 0.001) with increasing slaughter weight. In our experiment, we found a linear increase in meat content and a decrease in fat content in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass, and in the lumbosacral third of the carcass, we had a linear increase in their content as mentioned by other researchers. Moreover, as found by many scientists [37], linear decrease (p < 0.001) of carcass, bone, and skin muscles, as well as a linear increase (p < 0.05) of carcass fat, when the slaughter weight increased to 113.6 kg was not observed in our results.

However, our results on the increase in meat content with increasing slaughter weight do not coincide with the found reports [38] where it is stated that the yield of lean meat did not change, as muscle depth increased with increasing slaughter weight from 95 to 105 kg (p < 0.05).

Recent data have also been published, which are in complete agreement with our findings that the increase in pre-slaughter weight of animals was accompanied by an increase in carcass weight of the carcass, shoulder fat thickness, and total carcass weight [39].

A number of studies have reported the correlation between the pre-slaughter live weight of pigs and the parameters of leanness of their carcasses. Data from some of them indicate that the percentage of lean meat depends not only on the ratio of tissues, but also on the slaughter yield. Increasing the slaughter yield by 1% increases the average yield of muscle tissue by 0.84 kg. Whereas an increase of 1% in the content of lean meat in the carcass of slaughter animals increases the content of muscle tissue by 0.52 kg [40]. In other scientific works, the positive correlation of a high degree between live weight of animals before slaughter and the maintenance of both meat and fat in carcasses of young growth is established [41]. Similarly, in our study, the carcass weight significantly affected the meat content in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass by 61.9%, where the correlation was lineal, inverse, and weak (−0.33), and the meat content decreased by 0.44% with an increase in pre-slaughter weight by 1%.

In most scientific studies, the increased growth rate, which results in a higher pre-slaughter weight, strongly correlates with the content of fat and meat. Some authors suggest that selection to increase the rate of growth at fattening increases both the thickness of fat and muscle depth [4143].

But it is clear that the correlation coefficients between growth rate and fat and meat content show a certain range of unpredictability. It is thought that this may be due to the method of measurement, the influence of technology, differences in breed and sampling errors [44].

In general, many authors suggest that the slaughter weight of pigs of 125 and 135 kg may be optimal for production without compromising the quality of meat [45]. The discrepancy in the reported effects of pre-slaughter weight among the studies can be explained by genetics and (or) age of pigs at slaughter [46], but this contradicts our results, because the experiment used pigs of the same genetics of the equal age.

Slaughter of animals of increased weight condition (over 120 kg) will increase the slaughter yield by 3.72%, which is even more than in our previous study, where we found a higher meat content of 1.8 and 1.6% in pigs and castrates, respectively, at higher pre-slaughter weight of pigs [47].

The assumption that an increase in carcass weight will lead to an increase in fat content was not confirmed in our studies, which correlates with the findings [48], which say that the fat content in carcasses increased to a weight of 100 kg, and then remained stable and depended more on pig gender and genotype than on pre-slaughter weight [49]. Moreover, the low content of fat within 1.5% is the optimal indicator, which does not worsen the consumer preferences [50,51].

5 Conclusions

  1. Animals of the highest weight condition of 120 kg significantly prevailed in absolute and relative terms of meat content as in the section of thirds of their carcasses: cervical-scapular by 16.06 and 1.10%, dorsal-lumbar by 17.37 and 1.50%, pelvic-femoral by 8.02%, and in general by 13.44 and 3.72%, respectively.

  2. There is no significant difference in fat and bone content between animals at pre-slaughter weights of 110 and 120 kg. The study found higher values of fat content by 13.16% and bone content by 23.39% for the dorsal-lumbar third of the carcass and higher values of bone content by 14.81% and fat content by 7.81% for the pelvic-femoral third of the carcasses for pigs slaughtered at a weight 120 kg.

  3. The probable influence of the factor of pre-slaughter weight on the share of meat in certain parts of the carcass is established: 61.96% for the cervical-scapular third, 62.21% for the dorsal-lumbar third, and 96.57% for the pelvic-femoral thirds. The proportion of fat and the proportion of bones under the action of the pre-slaughter weight factor varied from 85.66 to 98.28% and from 94.29 to 99.99%, respectively, depending on the part of the pigs carcass.

  4. Significant inverse relationship between meat content and fat content in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass was moderate in animals raised up to 120 kg and was high in analogues weighing 110 kg. In the dorsal-lumbar third of pigs carcass of both weight conditions, no probable relationship between meat and fat content has been established. In the pelvic-femoral third of the carcass, the correlation between muscle tissue content and adipose tissue content was significant, but weak in 120 kg pigs, and its presence has not been confirmed in analogues.

  5. In animals fattened until 120 kg, changes in meat content caused by changes in adipose tissue content were at the level of 46.96% in the pelvic-femoral third and at the level of 8.70% in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass. In 110 kg analogues, the interdependence between changes in meat content and fat content was formed at 49.44% only for the cervical-scapular third of the carcass.

  6. It has been proved that in pigs at a pre-slaughter weight of 120 kg for each additional increase in fat content by 1.0 kg, the meat content was proportionally insufficient by 0.43 kg in the cervical-scapular third and by 0.39 kg in the pelvic-femoral third of the carcass. In peers weighing 110 kg, each additional 1 kg of fat did not allow to gain 0.72 kg of meat in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass.

  7. The study shows that pig carcass during fattening up to 110 kg is more sensitive (44.99%) to changes in meat–fat ratios in the cervical-scapular third, which allows more targeted formation of the characteristics of semi-finished products of this part at this stage. The dependence of the content of meat, fat and bones in the cervical-scapular third of the carcass is reduced by the impact of growth intensity by 8.7% when pigs are slaughtered weighing 120 kg. The effect of growth intensity of pigs on the interdependence between the ratio of meat to fat content increases by 46.96% in the pelvic-femoral third of the carcass when growing pigs to weight 120 kg. This level of interdependence between the content of meat and lard could affect the quality of semi-finished products.

  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: MP developed research and participated in data collection and critical examination of the manuscript; OM participated in data collection, analyzed the results, interpreted the data, collected literature review, and compiled the manuscript; TV analyzed and summarized the data; OS described the results and edited the text; RS conducted a statistical analysis; KN collected literature review; IR collected literature review.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Bankovska IB, Voloshchuk VM. Genotype factors and way of animal housing affected on the morphological composition carcasses of pigs. Ukrainian Black Sea Reg Agrarian Sci. 2015;2(84):91–9 (Ukrainian). http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vanp_2015_2(2)__16.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Nikolaev DV. Evaluation of meat productivity when fattening hybrid gilts to live weight of 100, 110, and 120 kg. Bull Nizhnevolzhsky Agro-university Complex: Sci High Professional Educ. 2014;2(34):129–34 (Russian). https://www.volgau.com/Portals/0/izv_auk/izv_auk_full/izvestiya_2014_34_2.pdf?ver=Lb8Dc2tf0uxpwHUpE4QMyQ%3d%3d.Search in Google Scholar

[3] González E, Carrapiso A, Noguera JL, Ibáñez-Escriche N, Tejeda JF. Effect of genetic and diet on Iberian pig fresh loin (m. Longissimus dorsi). Arch. Zootec. Proceedings IX Simposio Internacional Sobre el Cerdo Mediterráneo. Cordoba, Spain: 2018. p. 185–7. https://riunet.upv.es/bitstream/handle/10251/153355/Gonzalez?sequence=1.10.21071/az.v67iSupplement.3600Search in Google Scholar

[4] Renaudeau D, Hilaire M, Mourot JA. Comparison of carcass and meat quality characteristics of Creole and Large White pigs slaughtered at 150 days of age. Anim Res. 2005;54(1):43–54. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00890019/document.10.1051/animres:2004042Search in Google Scholar

[5] Baranikov VA, Zhivotova TY, Gorlov IF, Nikolaev DV. The use of pigs of different genotypes in fattening to different weight conditions and their impact on meat productivity. Proc Lower Volga Agric Univer Compl Zootechn Veterinary Med. 2013 [cited 2021 Nov 1];3(31):1–6 (Russian). Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ispolzovanie-sviney-raznyh-genotipov-pri-otkorme-do-raznyh-vesovyh-konditsiy-i-ih-vliyanie-na-myasnuyu-produktivnost. Subscription required.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Parunović N, Petrović M, Matekalo-Sverak V, Radović Č, Stanišić N. Carcass properties, chemical content and fatty acid composition of the musculus longissimus of different pig genotypes. S Afr J Anim Sci. 2013 [cited 2021 Oct 31];43(2):123–136. http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0375-15892013000200002&lng=en. Subscription required.10.4314/sajas.v43i2.2Search in Google Scholar

[7] Ayuso D, González A, Peña F, Hernández-García FI, Izquierdo M. Effect of fattening period length on intramuscular and subcutaneous fatty acid profiles in Iberian pigs finished in the montanera sustainable system. Sustainability. 2020;12(19):7937. 10.3390/su12197937.Search in Google Scholar

[8] García-Gudiño J, Monteiro A, Espagnol S, Blanco-Penedo I, Garcia-Launay F. Life Cycle assessment of Iberian traditional pig production system in Spain. Sustainability. 2020;12(2):627. 10.3390/su12020627.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Khmelnychyi LM, Vecherka VV, Shpetny MB, Bordunova OG, Pavlenko YM, Opara VO. Fattening and slaughter qualities of pigs of different weight categories reared in machines on polymer and concrete floors. Bull Sumy Natl Agrarian Univ Livest. 2020;1(40):1–9 (Ukrainian). 10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2020.1.1.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Wu F, Vierck KR, DeRouchey JM, O’Quinn TG, Tokach MD, Goodband RD, et al. A review of heavy weight market pigs: status of knowledge and future needs assessment. Transl Anim Sci. 2017;1(1):1–15. 10.2527/tas2016.0004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Nechmilov VM. Optimization of technological methods of rearing hybrid young pigs of Irish selection in terms of industrial technology [dissertation]. Mykolayiv: Mykolayiv National Agrarian University; 2019 (Ukrainian). https://www.mnau.edu.ua/files/spec_vchen_rad/d_38_806_02/dis_nechmolov.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Samokhina EA, Mykhalko OG. Morphological composition of carcasses of pigs-final hybrids of the Yorkshire x Landrace x Maxgro genotype depending on weight conditions. Breed Genet Anim. 2018;55:124–8 (Ukrainian). http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/rgt_2018_55_19.pdf.10.31073/abg.55.17Search in Google Scholar

[13] Peláez FR, González MA, Avilés C, Martínez AL, Peña F. Effects of the rearing system and gender on the performance, carcass traits, and instrumental and sensory quality of meat from the “Criollo negro de la costa ecuatoriana” Pigs. Rev Científica. 2017;XXVII(3):194–202 (Spanish). https://www.redalyc.org/journal/959/95952010009/html/.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Povod MG, Shvachka RP, Mykhalko OG, Yurieva KV. Productive qualities of sows and their offspring depending on the duration of the suckling period. Bull Sumy Natl Agrarian Univ. Livestock. 2019;4(39):72–84 (Ukrainian) 10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2019.4.11.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Povod MG, Mykhalko OG, Vdovichenko YV, Nechmilov VM. Morphological composition of pig carcasses for different types of feeding, duration of rearing and pre-slaughter live weight. Agrarian Sci Food Technol. 2018;3(102):47–56 (Ukrainian). http://repository.vsau.org/getfile.php/19266.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Cisneros F, Ellis M, McKeith FK, McCaw J, Fernando RL. Influence of slaughter weight on growth and carcass characteristics, commercial cutting and curing yields, and meat quality of barrows and gilts from two genotypes. J Anim Sci. 1996;74:925–33. 10.2527/1996.745925x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Latorre MA, Lázaro R, Valencia DG, Medel P, Mateos GG. The effects of gender and slaughter weight on the growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality characteristics of heavy pigs. J Anim Sci. 2004 Feb;82(2):526–33. 10.2527/2004.822526x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Álvarez-Rodríguez J, Teixeira A. Slaughter weight rather than gender affects carcass cuts and tissue composition of Bisaro pigs. Meat Sci. 2019;154:54–60. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.04.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Shejko RI, Fedorenkova LA, Zayats VN, Khramchenko NM, Yanovich EA, Pristupa NV, et al. Fattening and meat traits of young pigs bred in Belarus, their variability and correlation. Zootechnical Sci Belarus: Collect Sci Pap. 2013;47(1):202–9 (Russian). https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=BY2012001088.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Borah P, Bora JR, Borpuzari RN, Haque A, Bhuyan R, Hazarika S. Effect of age, gender and slaughter weight on productive performance,carcass characteristics and meat quality of crossbred (Hampshire x Assam local) pigs. Indian J Anim Res. 2016;50:601–5. 10.18805/ijar.11250.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Polkovnykova VY. Fattening qualities and meat productivity of pigs of different genotypes. Zootekhniia. 2015 [cited 2021 Nov 1];6(56)151–4. (Russian). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otkormochnye-kachestva-i-myasnaya-produktivnost-sviney-raznyh-genotipov, Subscription required.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Oliveira EA, Bertol TM, Coldebela A, Santos Filho JI, Scandolera AJ, Warpechowski MB. Live performance, carcass quality, and economic assessment of over 100 kg slaughtered pigs. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2015;67(6):1743–50. 10.1590/1678-4162-7632.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Barducci RS, Zhou ZY, Wormsbecher L, Roehrig C, Tulpan D, Bohrer BM. The relationship of pork carcass weight and leanness parameters in the Ontario commercial pork industry. Transl Anim Sci. 2020;4(1):331–8. 10.1093/tas/txz169.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] Latorre MA, Olivares A, Callejo A, Rey AI, Pérez-Ciria L, López Bote CJ, et al. A comparison of female and castrate pigs slaughtered at weights above and below 120 kg on carcass traits, intramuscular fat and fatty acid composition of carcasses intended for dry-cured ham and shoulder production. Anim Prod Sci. 2019;59:1923–30. 10.1071/AN18267.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Council of the European Union. Council Directive 86/609/EEC of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Off J Eur Commun. 1986;358:1–28.Search in Google Scholar

[26] ISO 3100-1, Meat and meat products – Sampling and preparation of test samples – Part 1: Sampling. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/iso/173c37dd-6a81-4146-beeb-bb1c6fe94c52/iso-3100-1-1991.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32010L0063.Search in Google Scholar

[28] On protection of animals against brutal treatment, Law of Ukraine, No. 3447-IV, adopted on February 21, 2006 (as amended on 14-01-2020) (Ukrainian). https://cis-legislation.com/document.fwx?rgn=18258.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Makaukii AF, Lekule FP. Effect of slaughter weight on characteristics and economics of pig production. Tanzan J Agric Sc. 2000;3(1):55–62. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/tjags/article/view/115911/105460.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Pieterse E, Siebrits F, Gloy E, Polawska E. The effect of slaughter weight on the carcass characteristics of pork with gender type as co-variable. Anim Prod Sci. 2016;56:55–60. 10.1071/AN14183.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Peinado J, Serrano MP, Medel P, Fuentetaja A, Mateos GG. Productive performance, carcass and meat quality of intact and castrated gilts slaughtered at 106 or 122 kg. BW Anim. 2011;5(7):1131–40. 10.1017/S1751731111000061.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Leach LM, Ellis M, Sutton DS, McKeith FK, Wilson ER. The growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of halothane carrier and negative pigs. J Anim Sci. 1996;74:934–43. 10.2527/1996.745934x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Jeong JY, Park BC, Ha DM, Park MJ, Joo ST, Lee CY. Effects of increasing slaughter weight on production efficiency and carcass quality of finishing gilts and barrow. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2010;30(2b):206–15. 10.5851/kosfa.2010.30.2.206.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Wiseman TG, Mahan DC, Peters JC, Fastinger ND, Ching S, Kim YY. Tissue weights and body composition of two genetic lines of barrows and gilts from twenty to one hundred twenty-five kilograms of body weight. J Anim Sci. 2007;85(7):1825–35. 10.2527/jas.2006-407.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Birta HO, Burhu YH, Floka LV, Khmelnytska YV, Rachynska ZP. Morphological composition and meat and fat qualities of pig carcasses. Bull Sumy Natl Agrarian Univ Livest. 2020;4:27–32 (Ukrainian). http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vsna_tvar_2020_4_5.10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2020.4.4Search in Google Scholar

[36] JinLiang X, Gary D, James E. Pettigrew, performance, carcass, and meat quality advantages of boars over barrows: A literature review. Swine Health Prod. 1997;5(1):21–8. https://www.aasv.org/shap/issues/v5n1/v5n1p21.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Apple JK, Maxwell CV, Galloway DL, Hamilton CR, Yancey JW. Interactive effects of dietary fat source and slaughter weight in growing-finishing swine: III. Carcass and fatty acid compositions. J Anim Sci. 2009;87(4):1441–54. 10.2527/jas.2008-1455.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Conte S, Boyle L, O’Connell N, Lynch P, Lawlor P. Effect of target slaughter weight on production efficiency, carcass traits and behaviour of restrictively-fed gilts and intact male finisher pigs. Livest Sci. 2011;136:169–74. 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.08.018.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Więcek J, Skomiał J, Rekiel A, Florowski T, Dasiewicz K, Kosińska M. Fattening and slaughter parameters in the first period of fattening of pigs fed restrictive or semi ad libitumdiets. Pol J Food Nutr Sci. 2008;58(3):325–9. http://journal.pan.olsztyn.pl/pdf-98144-30858?filename=FATTENING%20AND%20SLAUGHTER.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Mykhailov NV, Sviatohorov NA. Selection of pigs for meat qualities. Sci J Kuban State Agrarian Univ. 2011 [cited 2021 Nov 1];70:1–11 (Russian). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/selektsiya-sviney-na-myasnye-kachestva. Subscription required.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Doilydov VA, Volkova EM. Productive qualities of purebred and local young pigs with different pre-slaughter weight. Actual Probl Intensive Dev Anim Husb. 2014 [cited 2021 Nov 1];17(1):203–213 (Russian). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/produktivnye-kachestva-chistoporodnogo-i-pomesnogo-molodnyaka-sviney-s-raznoy-preduboynoy-massoy-1 Subscription required.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Miar Y, Plastow G, Bruce H, Moore S, Manafiazar G, Kemp R, et al. Genetic and phenotypic correlations between performance traits with meat quality and carcass characteristics in commercial crossbred pigs. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e110105. 10.1371/journal.pone.0110105.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[43] Khalak VI. The effectiveness of using some methods of complex selection to assess young pigs for fattening and meat qualities. Bioresources and nature management. Zootechnics. 2015;7(556):25–31, https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/67951.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Zhou ZY, Bohrer BM. Defining pig sort loss with a simulation of various marketing options of pigs with the assumption that marketing cuts improve variation in carcass weight and leanness. Can J Anim Sci. 2018;99(3):542–52. 10.1139/cjas-2018-0195.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Park BC, Lee CY. Feasibility of increasing the slaughter weight of finishing pigs. J Anim Sci Technol. 2011;53(3):211–22. 10.5187/JAST.2011.53.3.211.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Virgili R, Degni M, Schivazappa C, Faeti V, Poletti E, Marchetto G, et al. Effect of age at slaughter on carcass traits and meat quality of Italian heavy pigs. J Anim Sci. 2003;81:2448–56. 10.2527/2003.81102448x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[47] Povod M, Kravchenko O, Getya A, Zhmailov V, Mykhalko O, Korzh O, et al. Influence of pre-killing living weight on the quality of carcases of hybrid pigs in the conditions of industrial pork production in Ukraine. J Sci Pap Ser Manag Econom Eng Agr Rural Dev. 2020;20(4):431–7, http://managementjournal.usamv.ro/pdf/vol.20_4/Art49.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Franco D, Vazquez JA, Lorenzo JM. Growth performance, carcass and meat quality of the Celta pig crossbred with Duroc and Landrance geno-types. Meat Sci. 2014;96(1):195–202. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.06.024.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] Carabús A, Sainz RD, Oltjen JW, Gispert M, Font-i-Furnols M. Growth of total fat and lean and of primal cuts is affected by the gender type. Animal. 2017;11:1321–9. 10.1017/S1751731117000039.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[50] Fortin A, Robertson WM, Tong AKW. The eating quality of Canadian pork and its relationship with intramuscular fat. Meat Sci. 2005;69:297–305. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.07.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[51] Fernández-Dueñas DM, Myers AJ, Scramlin SM, Parks CW, Carr SN, Killefer J, et al. Carcass, meat quality, and sensory characteristics of heavy body weight pigs fed ractopamine hydrochloride (Paylean). J Anim Sci. 2008;86(12):3544–50. 10.2527/jas.2008-0899.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2021-11-16
Revised: 2022-03-15
Accepted: 2022-04-15
Published Online: 2022-05-03

© 2022 Oleksandr Mykhalko et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Foliar application of boron positively affects the growth, yield, and oil content of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)
  3. Impacts of adopting specialized agricultural programs relying on “good practice” – Empirical evidence from fruit growers in Vietnam
  4. Evaluation of 11 potential trap crops for root-knot nematode (RKN) control under glasshouse conditions
  5. Technical efficiency of resource-poor maize farmers in northern Ghana
  6. Bulk density: An index for measuring critical soil compaction levels for groundnut cultivation
  7. Efficiency of the European Union farm types: Scenarios with and without the 2013 CAP measures
  8. Participatory validation and optimization of the Triple S method for sweetpotato planting material conservation in southern Ethiopia
  9. Selection of high-yield maize hybrid under different cropping systems based on stability and adaptability parameters
  10. Soil test-based phosphorus fertilizer recommendation for malting barley production on Nitisols
  11. Effects of domestication and temperature on the growth and survival of the giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) postlarvae
  12. Influence of irrigation regime on gas exchange, growth, and oil quality of field grown, Texas (USA) olive trees
  13. Present status and prospects of value addition industry for agricultural produce – A review
  14. Competitiveness and impact of government policy on chili in Indonesia
  15. Growth of Rucola on Mars soil simulant under the influence of pig slurry and earthworms
  16. Effect of potassium fertilizer application in teff yield and nutrient uptake on Vertisols in the central highlands of Ethiopia
  17. Dissection of social interaction and community engagement of smallholder oil palm in reducing conflict using soft system methodology
  18. Farmers’ perception, awareness, and constraints of organic rice farming in Indonesia
  19. Improving the capacity of local food network through local food hubs’ development
  20. Quality evaluation of gluten-free biscuits prepared with algarrobo flour as a partial sugar replacer
  21. Effect of pre-slaughter weight on morphological composition of pig carcasses
  22. Study of the impact of increasing the highest retail price of subsidized fertilizer on rice production in Indonesia
  23. Agrobiodiversity and perceived climatic change effect on family farming systems in semiarid tropics of Kenya
  24. Influences of inter- and intra-row spacing on the growth and head yield of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) in western Amhara, Ethiopia
  25. The supply chain and its development concept of fresh mulberry fruit in Thailand: Observations in Nan Province, the largest production area
  26. Toward achieving sustainable development agenda: Nexus between agriculture, trade openness, and oil rents in Nigeria
  27. Phenotyping cowpea accessions at the seedling stage for drought tolerance in controlled environments
  28. Apparent nutrient utilization and metabolic growth rate of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, cultured in recirculating aquaculture and biofloc systems
  29. Influence of season and rangeland-type on serum biochemistry of indigenous Zulu sheep
  30. Meta-analysis of responses of broiler chickens to Bacillus supplementation: Intestinal histomorphometry and blood immunoglobulin
  31. Weed composition and maize yield in a former tin-mining area: A case study in Malim Nawar, Malaysia
  32. Strategies for overcoming farmers’ lives in volcano-prone areas: A case study in Mount Semeru, Indonesia
  33. Principal component and cluster analyses based characterization of maize fields in southern central Rift Valley of Ethiopia
  34. Profitability and financial performance of European Union farms: An analysis at both regional and national levels
  35. Analysis of trends and variability of climatic parameters in Teff growing belts of Ethiopia
  36. Farmers’ food security in the volcanic area: A case in Mount Merapi, Indonesia
  37. Strategy to improve the sustainability of “porang” (Amorphophallus muelleri Blume) farming in support of the triple export movement policy in Indonesia
  38. Agrarian contracts, relations between agents, and perception on energy crops in the sugarcane supply chain: The Peruvian case
  39. Factors influencing the adoption of conservation agriculture by smallholder farmers in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
  40. Meta-analysis of zinc feed additive on enhancement of semen quality, fertility and hatchability performance in breeder chickens
  41. Meta-analysis of the potential of dietary Bacillus spp. in improving growth performance traits in broiler chickens
  42. Biocomposites from agricultural wastes and mycelia of a local mushroom, Lentinus squarrosulus (Mont.) Singer
  43. Cross transferability of barley nuclear SSRs to pearl millet genome provides new molecular tools for genetic analyses and marker assisted selection
  44. Detection of encapsulant addition in butterfly-pea (Clitoria ternatea L.) extract powder using visible–near-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics analysis
  45. The willingness of farmers to preserve sustainable food agricultural land in Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  46. Transparent conductive far-infrared radiative film based on polyvinyl alcohol with carbon fiber apply in agriculture greenhouse
  47. Grain yield stability of black soybean lines across three agroecosystems in West Java, Indonesia
  48. Forms of land access in the sugarcane agroindustry: A comparison of Brazilian and Peruvian cases
  49. Assessment of the factors contributing to the lack of agricultural mechanization in Jiroft, Iran
  50. Do poor farmers have entrepreneurship skill, intention, and competence? Lessons from transmigration program in rural Gorontalo Province, Indonesia
  51. Communication networks used by smallholder livestock farmers during disease outbreaks: Case study in the Free State, South Africa
  52. Sustainability of Arabica coffee business in West Java, Indonesia: A multidimensional scaling approach
  53. Farmers’ perspectives on the adoption of smart farming technology to support food farming in Aceh Province, Indonesia
  54. Rice yield grown in different fertilizer combination and planting methods: Case study in Buru Island, Indonesia
  55. Paclobutrazol and benzylaminopurine improve potato yield grown under high temperatures in lowland and medium land
  56. Agricultural sciences publication activity in Russia and the impact of the national project “Science.” A bibliometric analysis
  57. Storage conditions and postharvest practices lead to aflatoxin contamination in maize in two counties (Makueni and Baringo) in Kenya
  58. Relationship of potato yield and factors of influence on the background of herbological protection
  59. Biology and life cycle Of Diatraea busckella (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) under simulated altitudinal profile in controlled conditions
  60. Evaluation of combustion characteristics performances and emissions of a diesel engine using diesel and biodiesel fuel blends containing graphene oxide nanoparticles
  61. Effect of various varieties and dosage of potassium fertilizer on growth, yield, and quality of red chili (Capsicum annuum L.)
  62. Review Articles
  63. Germination ecology of three Asteraceae annuals Arctotis hirsuta, Oncosiphon suffruticosum, and Cotula duckittiae in the winter-rainfall region of South Africa: A review
  64. Animal waste antibiotic residues and resistance genes: A review
  65. A brief and comprehensive history of the development and use of feed analysis: A review
  66. The evolving state of food security in Nigeria amidst the COVID-19 pandemic – A review
  67. Short Communication
  68. Response of cannabidiol hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) varieties grown in the southeastern United States to nitrogen fertilization
  69. Special Issue on the International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research – Agrarian Sciences
  70. Special issue on the International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research – Agrarian Sciences: Message from the editor
  71. Maritime pine land use environmental impact evolution in the context of life cycle assessment
  72. Influence of different parameters on the characteristics of hazelnut (var. Grada de Viseu) grown in Portugal
  73. Organic food consumption and eating habit in Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown
  74. Customer knowledge and behavior on the use of food refrigerated display cabinets: A Portuguese case
  75. Perceptions and knowledge regarding quality and safety of plastic materials used for food packaging
  76. Understanding the role of media and food labels to disseminate food related information in Lebanon
  77. Liquefaction and chemical composition of walnut shells
  78. Validation of an analytical methodology to determine humic substances using low-volume toxic reagents
  79. Special Issue on the International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development – IConARD 2020
  80. Behavioral response of breeder toward development program of Ongole crossbred cattle in Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia
  81. Special Issue on the 2nd ICSARD 2020
  82. Perceived attributes driving the adoption of system of rice intensification: The Indonesian farmers’ view
  83. Value-added analysis of Lactobacillus acidophilus cell encapsulation using Eucheuma cottonii by freeze-drying and spray-drying
  84. Investigating the elicited emotion of single-origin chocolate towards sustainable chocolate production in Indonesia
  85. Temperature and duration of vernalization effect on the vegetative growth of garlic (Allium sativum L.) clones in Indonesia
  86. Special Issue on Agriculture, Climate Change, Information Technology, Food and Animal (ACIFAS 2020)
  87. Prediction model for agro-tourism development using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system method
  88. Special Issue of International Web Conference on Food Choice and Eating Motivation
  89. Can ingredients and information interventions affect the hedonic level and (emo-sensory) perceptions of the milk chocolate and cocoa drink’s consumers?
Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/opag-2022-0096/html
Scroll to top button