Startseite Medizin Shifts in peak month of births and socio-economic factors: a study of divided and reunified Germany 1950–2022
Artikel Open Access

Shifts in peak month of births and socio-economic factors: a study of divided and reunified Germany 1950–2022

  • Bertram Häussler EMAIL logo und Joachim W. Dudenhausen
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 2. Dezember 2024

Abstract

Objectives

The seasonality of conception and birth has intrigued scientists for over 200 years. Since the 1970s, peak birth months in the northern hemisphere have shifted from early spring to late summer, influenced by oral contraceptives and socio-economic factors. The division of Germany from the end of World War II until reunification in 1990 offers a unique opportunity to analyze these influences while both regions had equal access to contraception. This study aims to identify differences in fertility trends and peak birth months between West and East Germany before and after reunification, considering political, socio-economic factors, and contraceptive availability.

Methods

A population-based study analyzed overall fertility rates, monthly birth data, peak birth months, and average maternal ages from 1950 to 2022.

Results

Fertility patterns were similar in both regions until 1970, showing a sharp increase post-1955 followed by a decline around 1965, likely due to contraception. From 1970 to 1990, East German fertility increased while West Germany’s remained lower. After reunification, East German fertility fell sharply but later rose to West German levels. The peak birth month shifted from March to August in West Germany by the mid-1980s, while East Germany experienced this change 20 years later, post-reunification.

Conclusions

The 20-year delay in East Germany’s shift suggests that oral contraception’s impact was influenced by other factors, particularly the age of women at childbirth. Increased control over fertility in the West allowed for more choice in conception timing, a trend adopted in the East after gaining similar autonomy.

Introduction

Living organisms from plants to animals, including humans, are heavily influenced by their environment. Rhythmic fluctuations in biological processes or behaviour can be observed according to circadian [1] or seasonal changes [2]. Human births also have a strong seasonal pattern which has been consistently demonstrated although the mechanism is not well understood. A role for social factors has been suspected but has not been generally recognized.

Seasonality in human births is a phenomenon that can be traced back a very long time and in practically all populations studied. In the northern hemisphere, this phenomenon has long followed the pattern of a strong seasonal peak in the months of February to April. The phenomenon had been described very early for the German town of Görlitz in the 17th century [3], for a Canadian population in the 17th century [4], it has been reported for Eskimo populations between 1778 and 1918 [5], and the famous statistician Quetelet described it for Brussels in 1826 [6].

European data from the 20th century, but before the introduction of oral contraceptives, for countries such as Sweden, Finland, England, the Netherlands and Germany also show a similar pattern with a marked peak of births in March [7], [8], [9].

There are also a number of studies that report a shift in the peak month of births, which began after the 1970s. This shift has occurred from spring to late summer and has been shown in France [10], Greece [11], Poland [12] and a number of other countries [7]. In Sweden, the disappearance of the spring summit did not result in the formation of a new peak [13].

Most studies point to the introduction of oral contraceptives as an explanation, which has been introduced in practically all countries in which this phenomenon has been studied. However, other socio-demographic and lifestyle factors as well as family planning, which may differ from country to country, have been suggested to influence the shift in peak month of birth.

In this respect, Germany is of interest because between the end of the Second World War and 1990 it was divided by the ‘Iron Curtain’ into West Germany, which belonged politically and economically to the Western bloc, and East Germany, which belonged to the Eastern bloc. While oral contraception was introduced at roughly the same time in both blocs, there were major economic, political and social differences between the two blocs and thus also between the two parts of Germany.

This study aims to investigate the changes in fertility, age of mothers at birth and magnitude of seasonality between East and West Germany from 1950 and 2022. We expand on the study by Lerchl et al. [14] which looked at these factors only in West Germany until 1990. The results will be interpreted against the background of political and socio-economic factors and the availability of oral contraceptives.

Materials and methods

Live births, conceptions, and population

The number of births in each month for both parts of Germany was obtained on the basis of data provided specifically for this study by the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (Destatis). From 1950 to 1989, the data for East Germany includes data for East Berlin and the data for West Germany also includes data for West Berlin. From 1990 onwards, the data for the two differentiated subpopulations in Berlin (East and West) is no longer available and are therefore not included in the analysis.

Based on the evidence of a large population based study there are 268 days between ovulation and birth [15]. As conception is close to ovulation it is assumed that a pregnancy lasts nine months. This time is used to calculate the conversion from the month of birth to the month of conception by adding three months.

In order to be able to compare the seasonality of births with the fertility of the two subpopulations, Destatis has also provided population data for East and West Germany separately by age and sex. The breakdown for the two parts of Berlin applies to these data in the same way as reported above. The number of women of childbearing age between 15 and 44 was aggregated.

The mean age of mothers at the birth of a child as annual average for East and West Germany is published by Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung [16].

Parameters of the analysis

The “general fertility rate” was calculated for both subpopulations by dividing the number of live births in a year by the number of women of the childbearing age [17].

For the “peak number of births” the number of monthly births was standardised to an average number of 30 calendar days per month in order to compensate for the different numbers of calendar days per month. Based on this, the ranking of the number of births in each month of the respective year was determined. The ordinal number of the month in the course of the year was determined for the top three ranks (January=1, February=2, etc.) and the mean value was calculated from this. This value was used to calculate a moving average, which was formed from five consecutive years with the current year in the centre.

The magnitude of seasonality is defined by calculating the ratio in the number of observed births in the peak month compared to the expected number of births, standardized to an average of 30 days per month.

Results

Fertility and mother’s age

In both parts of Germany, there was a considerable increase in births and the birth rate between the mid-1950s and mid-1960s. This was followed by a decline from 1964 in the East and from 1967 in the West, which lasted 10 years in the East and 12 years in the West (Figure 1).

Figure 1: 
Number of life births and general fertility rate in East and West Germany from 1950 to 2022. Source: [15].
Figure 1:

Number of life births and general fertility rate in East and West Germany from 1950 to 2022. Source: [15].

Until around 1974, there was a sharp decline in the birth rate in both parts of Germany, although this reversed into an increase in the birth rate in the East from 1975 on. This increase continued until 1980 and levelled off slightly until 1987.

A further massive decline to around a third of the maximum birth rate of the 1960s occurred in East Germany in the course of the reunification of the two parts of Germany in 1990 and in the years that followed. However, the decline in fertility in the East recovered over the 20 years following reunification, with the figures in the East even exceeding those in the West in 2017 [18]. Fertility rates are currently falling again in both East and West Germany (Figure 1).

The average age of mothers at birth: In this context, it should be taken into account that in the West, parallel to the decline in fertility and the transition of the month of birth, there was an almost linear increase in the age of women at the birth of their first child from 24.2 to 27.0 years. The increase in the East over the same period was only 23.3 to 24.6 years (Figure 2). It was only when the division of the country was abolished that the birth age of women rose very quickly, reaching the same level as in the West in 2001. In 2022 in both parts of the country the average age increased to more than 30 years.

Figure 2: 
Average age of mothers at the birth of their 1st child. Source: [22].
Figure 2:

Average age of mothers at the birth of their 1st child. Source: [22].

Peak month of births and the magnitude of seasonality

The peak month for births in both parts of Germany from 1950 to 1970 was consistently between March and April – as has also been reported for this period in numerous studies for the northern hemisphere (see introduction above).

In West Germany, there was a continuous shift of the peak month to mid-July in the period from 1971 to 1983, which then stabilised in the month of August from 2005 until the end of the observation period in 2022. In contrast, there was only a slight shift to the end of April in East Germany in the 1970s. It was only after reunification in 1990 that there was also a strong shift to the month of August, which then also remained stable until 2022 (Figure 3).

Figure 3: 
Average peak month of births and general fertility rate in East and West Germany from 1950 to 2022. Source: [15].
Figure 3:

Average peak month of births and general fertility rate in East and West Germany from 1950 to 2022. Source: [15].

While the classic annual profile of births is clearly recognisable in both parts of Germany in the 1950–1969 period (+8 %/-8%), the 1970–1989 period shows that the traditional pattern is even more pronounced in Eastern Germany, while in West Germany the deviations tend to be smaller and a shift towards a peak in late summer can already be seen. In the period 1990–2022, the transition to late summer is practically the same in both parts and again very pronounced (+8 %/-8%). Strong seasonality has again been established, albeit with a shift of five to six months (Figure 4).

Figure 4: 
Deviation of the monthly number of births from the expected number in three different epochs for East and West Germany (normalised values). Source [15].
Figure 4:

Deviation of the monthly number of births from the expected number in three different epochs for East and West Germany (normalised values). Source [15].

Discussion

The decline in fertility after the post-war baby boom began in 1964 in West Germany, but as early as 1962 in East Germany. In this context, it is important to note that oral ovulation inhibitors were available in West Germany from 1961, but only in East Germany from 1965 [19]. Oral ovulation inhibitors are mentioned in the literature as a significant, if not the only factor in explaining the decline in fertility in Western societies [20]. The fact that the decline in the East began earlier than “the pill” was available could be due to political and personal pressure that was increased after 1961 by the erection of the border fortifications, which effectively banned East Germans from travelling to the West [21].

The fertility recovery observed exclusively in East Germany from 1975 onwards can be attributed to a state program specifically designed to boost fertility, offering incentives and material support for starting families and having children [22], 23].

The renewed sharp decline in fertility, which began in 1990 with the political reunification of the two Germanys, was also limited to Eastern Germany. This has been characterised as part of a “demographic shock” in East Germany that also included high out-migration and a temporary decline in male life expectancy in the years following reunification [24]. The fertility decline was interpreted as a response to the sudden increase in economic uncertainties in the East, as well as an opportunity to escape the pressure to have children at a young age [25].

The shift of the peak month of birth from March to August was observed in West Germany as in various other countries at the beginning of the 1970s. It is interesting to note that the change in both parts of the country was associated with a sharp increase in the average age of mothers at the birth of their children, but 20 years later in the East.

The fact that the average age of mothers has increased considerably in the course of the decline of fertility should be seen in the context that women (and their partners) are considerably more likely to have their own home at the time of childbearing than in the past [26]. Together with access to effective fertility control this means that young couples have more freedom and opportunities in choosing the time to conceive a child. The availability of opportunities for sexual activities is relevant for seasonal effects of giving birth is underlined by the fact that Germany as many other countries show an intermediate peak of births around mid-September, indicating that the opportunities provided by Christmas holidays are being seized [27]. The preference for using holidays as favoured times for sexual activities is also evident in analyses of health tracking apps [28].

The comparison of the two parts of Germany indicates that the availability of contraceptives is obviously not the only factor to induce the shift of the peak month of birth. In East Germany, it was only after the political unification of the two parts of Germany – and with the end of the East German state policy towards reproductive behaviour – that there was a simultaneous decline of fertility, an increase in the average age of women of childbearing age, and a shift in the peak month of births. This combination occurred in East Germany only 20 years after it was observed in West Germany, and it could be argued that the freedom to control fertility has only been fully granted after the end of the Eastern state policy towards reproduction.

The freedom to determine their fertility leads to a preference of November as peak month of conception, which in Germany is a month with low outside temperatures and long periods of darkness, where the focus of leisure activities is indoors. Such a constellation, in conjunction with the availability of one’s own apartment, offers sufficient opportunities for activities that lead to reproduction.

In Germany, about half of the women of reproductive age use oral contraceptives [29]. The desire to have children is often associated with the decision to stop taking the pill. If the interval between stopping the pill and conception is on average three months [30], this suggests that the summer holidays are a popular time to stop taking oral contraceptives.

In comparison with other countries, Germany shows a similarly strong pattern after the reunification as before. In other countries (France, Sweden), the transition appears to be less characterised by seasonality and the distribution over the year is more even [10], 13]. The development in Sweden, for instance, is interpreted as more freedom to choose individually and being therefore less dependent on seasonal factors [13]. In this context, a comparative study with Sweden or France would be of interest.


Corresponding author: Bertram Häussler, MD, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; and IGES Institute GmbH, Berlin Friedrichstr. 180, 10117, Germany, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Aschoff, J. Circadian rhythms in man. Science 1965;148:1427–32. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.148.3676.1427.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Rojansky, N, Brzezinski, A, Schenker, JG. Seasonality in human reproduction: an update. Hum Reprod 1992;7:735–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137729.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Miura, T, Richter, J. Changes in the seasonal distribution of births in Görlitz, Germany, during the period between 1657 and 1816. Hum Biol 1981;53:15–22.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Nonaka, K, Desjardins, B, Légaré, J, Charbonneau, H, Miura, T. Effects of maternal birth season on birth seasonality in the Canadian population during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Hum Biol 1990;62:701–17.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Ehrenkranz, JR. Seasonal breeding in humans: birth records of the Labrador Eskimo. Fertil Steril 1983;40:485–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47360-7.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Quetelet, A. Mémoire sur les lois des naissances et de la mortalité à Bruxelles. Nouveaux mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences et Belles-Lettres de Bruxelles:495–512 pp. [Internet]. 1826 [cited 2024 Jan 13] Available from: http://eudml.org/doc/180480.10.3406/marb.1826.3337Suche in Google Scholar

7. Roenneberg, T, Aschoff, J. Annual rhythm of human reproduction: i. biology, sociology, or both? J. Biol. Rhythms. 1990;5:195–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/074873049000500303.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Lam, DA, Miron, JA. Global patterns of seasonal variation in human fertility. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1994;709:9–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb30385.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Krombholz, H. Global patterns of seasonal variation in human birth rates – influence of climate and economic and social factors; 2023.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Régnier-Loilier, A. Changes in the seasonality of births in France from 1975 to the present. Population 2010;65:145–85. https://doi.org/10.3917/pope.1001.0145.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Athanassenas, GA. Seasonal variation of births in Greece. Temporal changes and regional differences over a 24-year period. Chronobiologia 1985;12:351–7.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Nenko, I, Briga, M, Micek, A, Jasienska, G. From January to June: birth seasonality across two centuries in a rural Polish community. Sci Rep 2022;12:18579. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22159-3.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Dahlberg, J, Andersson, G. Changing seasonal variation in births by sociodemographic factors: a population-based register study. Hum Reprod Open 2018;2018:hoy015. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoy015.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Lerchl, A, Simoni, M, Nieschlag, E. Changes in seasonality of birth rates in Germany from 1951 to 1990. Naturwissenschaften 1993;80:516–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01140808.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Jukic, AM, Baird, DD, Weinberg, CR, McConnaughey, DR, Wilcox, AJ. Length of human pregnancy and contributors to its natural variation. Hum Reprod 2013;28:2848–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det297.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung (BiB). Durchschnittliches Alter der Mütter bei Geburt ihrer Kinder in Deutschland, West- und Ostdeutschland (1960-2021) [cited 2024 Sep 26]. Available from: https://www.bib.bund.de/DE/Fakten/Fakt/Daten/F18-Alter-Muetter-bei-Geburt-Deutschland-West-Ost-ab-1960_xls.xls?__blob=publicationFile&v=3.Suche in Google Scholar

17. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia. General Fertility Rate. [cited 2024 Jan 28]. Available from: https://archive.unescwa.org/general-fertility-rate.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Goldstein, JR, Kreyenfeld, M. Has East Germany overtaken West Germany? Recent trends in order-specific fertility. Popul Dev Rev 2011;37:453–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00430.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. 55 Jahre “Pille. In: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung; 2024.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Leridon, H. Demographic effects of the introduction of steroid contraception in developed countries. Hum Reprod Update 2006;12:603–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dml025.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Fulbrook, M. Anatomy of a dictatorship: inside the GDR ; 1949 – 1989, 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press; 1997:307 p.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Böhm, S. Die Familienpolitik der DDR in den 70-er Jahren. München: GRIN Verlag; 2001.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Schulz, E. Zehn Jahre deutsche Währungs-Wirtschafts- und Sozialunion. VJH 2000;69:249–71. https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.69.2.249.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Häussler, B, Hempel, E, Reschke, P. Die Entwicklung von Lebenserwartung und Sterblichkeit in Ostdeutschland nach der Wende. Gesundheitswesen 1995;37:365–72.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Eberstadt, N. Demographic shocks after communism: eastern Germany, 1989–93. Popul Dev Rev 1994;20:137–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137633.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Statistisches Bundesamt. Mehr als ein Viertel der 25-Jährigen wohnte 2023 noch im Haushalt der Eltern. [cited 2024 Oct 13]. Available from: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2024/06/PD24_N028_12.html.Suche in Google Scholar

27. James, WH. Seasonal variation in human births. J Biosoc Sci 1990;22:113–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021932000018423.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Symul, L, Hsieh, P, Shea, A, Moreno, CRC, Skene, DJ, Holmes, S, et al. Unmasking Seasonal Cycles in Human Fertility: how holiday sex and fertility cycles shape birth seasonality. medRxiv. 2022 [cited 2024 Jan 13]. Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.19.20235010v2.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA). Verhütungsverhalten erwachsener. In: Ergebnisse der Repräsentativbefragung; 2018.Suche in Google Scholar

30. Belhadj, H, Sivin, I, Diaz, S, Pavez, M, Tejada, AS, Brache, V, et al.. Recovery of fertility after use of the levonorgestrel 20 mcg/d or Copper T 380 Ag intrauterine device. Contraception 1986;34:261–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-7824(86)90007-7.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2024-11-01
Accepted: 2024-11-11
Published Online: 2024-12-02
Published in Print: 2025-02-25

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Sex differences in lung function of adolescents or young adults born prematurely or of very low birth weight: a systematic review
  4. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  5. Shifts in peak month of births and socio-economic factors: a study of divided and reunified Germany 1950–2022
  6. The predictive role of serial transperineal sonography during the first stage of labor for cesarean section
  7. Gestational weight gain and obstetric outcomes in women with obesity in an inner-city population
  8. Placental growth factor as a predictive marker of preeclampsia in twin pregnancy
  9. Learning curve for the perinatal outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for selective fetal reduction: a single-center, 10-year experience from 2013 to 2023
  10. External validation of a non-invasive vaginal tool to assess the risk of intra-amniotic inflammation in pregnant women with preterm labor and intact membranes
  11. Placental fetal vascular malperfusion in maternal diabetes mellitus
  12. The importance of the cerebro-placental ratio at term for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in appropriate for gestational age fetuses
  13. Comparing achievability and reproducibility of pulsed wave Doppler and tissue Doppler myocardial performance index and spatiotemporal image correlation annular plane systolic excursion in the cardiac function assessment of normal pregnancies
  14. Characteristics of the pregnancy and labour course in women who underwent COVID-19 during pregnancy
  15. Original Articles – Fetus
  16. Sonographic visualization and measurement of the fetal optic chiasm and optic tract and association with the cavum septum pellucidum
  17. The association among fetal head position, fetal head rotation and descent during the progress of labor: a clinical study of an ultrasound-based longitudinal cohort study in nulliparous women
  18. Fetal hypoplastic left heart syndrome: key factors shaping prognosis
  19. The value of ultrasound spectra of middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery blood flow in adverse pregnancy outcomes
  20. Original Articles – Neonates
  21. A family-centric, comprehensive nurse-led home oxygen programme for neonatal chronic lung disease: home oxygen policy evaluation (HOPE) study
  22. Effects of a respiratory function indicator light on visual attention and ventilation quality during neonatal resuscitation: a randomised controlled crossover simulation trial
  23. Short Communication
  24. Incidence and awareness of dysphoric milk ejection reflex (DMER)
Heruntergeladen am 1.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2024-0526/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen