Startseite Aural vocabulary, orthographic vocabulary, and listening comprehension
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Aural vocabulary, orthographic vocabulary, and listening comprehension

  • Yo Hamada EMAIL logo und Kozo Yanagawa
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 9. Januar 2023

Abstract

Vocabulary is a key variable to successful listening comprehension. Research has explored the relationship between aural and orthographic vocabularies and listening comprehension. This current study examined the relationships among aural vocabulary, orthographic vocabulary, and listening comprehension within the same Japanese cohort in an integrated manner. The test data of 155 Japanese EFL students, who took identical aural and orthographic vocabulary tests (the listening vocabulary levels test [LVLT] and new vocabulary levels test [NVLT], respectively) and a high-stakes listening test (Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC) for Parts I and II), were analyzed. The results indicated that aural and orthographic vocabulary are closely related but not identical. Moreover, orthographic vocabulary is more connected to the word- and propositional-level understanding of extended texts than to aural vocabulary for the Japanese group. More specifically, the 2,000-word and 4,000-word level and the academic vocabulary of the orthographic vocabulary predicted 27% of the variance of the listening comprehension test performance, whereas only the academic words of the aural vocabulary predicted 8%.


Corresponding author: Yo Hamada, Glocal Center for Higher Education, Akita University, 1-1 Tegata gakuencho, 010-8502, Akita, Japan, E-mail:

Funding source: JSPS KAKENHI

Award Identifier / Grant number: JP21K00754

References

Alderson, J. Charles. 2005. Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. London, New York: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Al-Masrai, Ahmed & James Milton. 2012. The vocabulary knowledge of university students in Saudi Arabia. TESOL Arabia Perspectives 19(3). 13–19.Suche in Google Scholar

Andringa, Sible, Nomi Olsthoorn, Catherine van Beuningen, Rob Schoonen & Jan, Hulstijn. 2012. Determinants of success in native and non-native listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. Language Learning 62. 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00706.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Beglar, David. 2010. A Rasch-based validation of the vocabulary size test. Language Testing 27(1). 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209340194.Suche in Google Scholar

Cheng, Junyu & Joshua Matthews. 2018. The relationship between three measures of L2 vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading. Language Testing 35(1). 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216676851.Suche in Google Scholar

Cobb, Tom. 2022. Web vocabprofile, an adaptation of heatley, Nation & Coxhead’s (2002) Range. http://www.lextutor.ca/vp (accessed 21 December 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

Daneman, Meredyth and Patricia Carpenter. 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19(4). 450–466.10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6Suche in Google Scholar

Du, Guohui, Zuwati Hasim & Fong Peng Chew. 2021. Contribution of English aural vocabulary size levels to L2 listening comprehension. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2020-0004.Suche in Google Scholar

Ha, Hung Tan. 2021. Exploring the relationships between various dimensions of receptive vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading comprehension. Language Testing in Asia 11(20). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00131-8.Suche in Google Scholar

IELTS. 2022. Available at: https://ieltsjp.com/test-guide/test-guide-about-ielts/ (accessed 5 April 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

IIBC. 2018. TOEIC listening & reading official book, vol. 4. Tokyo: IIBC.Suche in Google Scholar

IIBC. 2022a. The official data and materials of TOEIC® listening & reading test. https://www.iibc-global.org/toeic/official_data/lr.html (accessed 5 April 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

IIBC. 2022b. Test format and content. https://www.iibc-global.org/english/toeic/test/lr/about/format.html (accessed 5 April 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

JACET. 2003. JACET8000: JACET word list of 8000 basic words. Tokyo: JACET.Suche in Google Scholar

Kanzaki, Masaya. 2015. Comparing TOEIC® and vocabulary test scores. In Gawin Brooks, Myles Grogan & Mathew Porter (eds.), The PanSIG 2014 conference proceedings – sustainability: Making teaching and learning last, 52–58. Miyazaki, Japan: JALT.Suche in Google Scholar

Laufer, Batia & Paul Nation. 1999. A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing 16(1). 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229901600103.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Chen-Hong. 2019. Using a listening vocabulary levels test to explore the effect of vocabulary knowledge on GEPT listening comprehension performance. Language Assessment Quarterly 16(3). 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2019.1648474.Suche in Google Scholar

Luo, Yuzhi, Hongwen Song, Li Wan & Xiaochu Zhang. 2021. The effect of vocabulary depth and breadth on English listening comprehension can depend on how comprehension is measured. Frontiers in Psychology 12. 657573. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657573.Suche in Google Scholar

Masrai, Ahmed. 2019. Exploring the impact of individual differences in aural vocabulary knowledge, written vocabulary knowledge and working memory capacity on explaining L2 learners’ listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics Review 11(3). 423–447. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2018-0106.Suche in Google Scholar

Matthews, Joshua & Junyu Cheng. 2015. Recognition of high frequency words from speech as a predictor of L2 listening comprehension. System 52. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.015.Suche in Google Scholar

Matthews, Joshua. 2018. Vocabulary for listening: Emerging evidence for high and mid-frequency vocabulary knowledge. System 72. 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.10.005.Suche in Google Scholar

McLean, Stuart & Brandon Kramer. 2015. The creation of a new vocabulary levels test. Shiken 19(2). 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814567889.Suche in Google Scholar

McLean, Stuart, Brandon Kramer & David Beglar. 2015. The creation and validation of a listening vocabulary levels test. Language Teaching Research 19(6). 741–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814567889.Suche in Google Scholar

Meara, Paul & James Milton. 2003. The Swansea levels test X_Lex. Newbury: Express.Suche in Google Scholar

Milton, James & Nicola Hopkins. 2006. Comparing phonological and orthographic vocabulary size: Do vocabulary tests underestimate the knowledge of some learners? The Canadian Modern Language Review 63(1). 127–147. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.127.Suche in Google Scholar

Milton, James, Jo Wade & Nicola Hopkins. 2010. Aural word recognition and oral competence in English as a foreign language. In Rubén Chacón-Beltrán, Christian Abello-Contesse & María del Mar Torreblanca-López (eds.), Insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning, 83–98. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847692900-007Suche in Google Scholar

Mizumoto, Atsushi & Taiko Shimamoto. 2008. A comparison of aural and written vocabulary size of Japanese EFL university learners. Language Education & Technology 45. 35–53.Suche in Google Scholar

Nation, Paul I. S. 2012. The BNC/COCA word family lists. https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/lals/resources/paul-nations-resources.Suche in Google Scholar

Nation, Paul I. S. & David Beglar. 2007. A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher 31(7). 9–13.Suche in Google Scholar

Qian, David D. & Mary Schedl. 2004. Evaluation of an in-depth vocabulary knowledge measure for assessing reading performance. Language Testing 21(1). 28–52. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532204lt273oa.Suche in Google Scholar

Rost, Michael & Steven Brown. 2022. Second language listening. In Eli. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of practical second language teaching and learning, 238–255. Routledge.10.4324/9781003106609-20Suche in Google Scholar

Schmitt, Norbert, Diane Schmitt & Caroline Clapham. 2001. Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing 18(1). 55–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800103.Suche in Google Scholar

Siegel, Joseph. 2016. Listening vocabulary: Embracing forgotten aural features. RELC Journal 47(3). 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216645477.Suche in Google Scholar

Uchihara, Takumi & Tetsuo Harada. 2018. Roles of vocabulary knowledge for success in English-medium instruction: Self-perceptions and academic outcomes of Japanese undergraduates. Tesol Quarterly 52(3). 564–587. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.453.Suche in Google Scholar

Vafaee, Payman & Yuichi Suzuki. 2020. The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary knowledge in second language listening ability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42(2). 383–410. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000676.Suche in Google Scholar

Vandergrift, Larry & Susan Baker. 2015. Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning 65(2). 390–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12105.Suche in Google Scholar

Vandergrift, Larry, Christine C. Goh, Catherine J. Mareschal & Marzieh H. Tafaghodtari. 2006. The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning 56(3). 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Yun & Jeanine Treffers-Daller. 2017. Explaining listening comprehension among L2 learners of English: The contribution of general language proficiency, vocabulary knowledge and metacognitive awareness. System 65. 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.013.Suche in Google Scholar

Webb, Stuart, Yosuke Sasao & Oliver, Balance. 2017. The updated vocabulary levels test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 168(1). 33–69. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.168.1.02web.Suche in Google Scholar

Yanagawa, Kozo. 2016. Examining the authenticity of the center listening test: Speech rate, reduced forms, hesitation and fillers, and processing levels. JACET Journal 60. 97–115.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Songshan & Xian Zhang. 2022. The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading/listening comprehension: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research 26(4). 696–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820913998.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-05-17
Accepted: 2022-12-04
Published Online: 2023-01-09
Published in Print: 2024-06-25

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. Consolidating EFL content and vocabulary learning via interactive reading
  4. Understanding salient trajectories and emerging profiles in the development of Chinese learners’ motivation: a growth mixture modeling approach
  5. Multilingual pedagogies in first versus foreign language contexts: a cross-country study of language teachers
  6. Classroom assessment and learning motivation: insights from secondary school EFL classrooms
  7. Interculturality and Islam in Indonesia’s high-school EFL classrooms
  8. Collaborative writing in an EFL secondary setting: the role of task complexity
  9. Spanish heritage speakers’ processing of lexical stress
  10. Effectiveness of second language collocation instruction: a meta-analysis
  11. Understanding the Usefulness of E-Portfolios: Linking Artefacts, Reflection, and Validation
  12. Syntactic prediction in L2 learners: evidence from English disjunction processing
  13. The cognitive construction-grammar approach to teaching the Chinese Ba construction in a foreign language classroom
  14. The predictive roles of enjoyment, anxiety, willingness to communicate on students’ performance in English public speaking classes
  15. Speaking proficiency development in EFL classrooms: measuring the differential effect of TBLT and PPP teaching approaches
  16. L2 textbook input and L2 written production: a case of Korean locative postposition–verb construction
  17. What does the processing of chunks by learners of Chinese tell us? An acceptability judgment investigation
  18. Comparative analysis of written corrective feedback strategies: a linear growth modeling approach
  19. Enjoyment in language teaching: a study into EFL teachers’ subjectivities
  20. Students’ attitude and motivation towards concept mapping-based prewriting strategies
  21. Pronunciation pedagogy in English as a foreign language teacher education programs in Vietnam
  22. The role of language aptitude probed within extensive instruction experience: morphosyntactic knowledge of advanced users of L2 English
  23. The impact of different glossing conditions on the learning of EFL single words and collocations in reading
  24. Patterns of motivational beliefs among high-, medium-, and low-achieving English learners in China
  25. The effect of linguistic choices in note-taking on academic listening performance: a pedagogical translanguaging perspective
  26. A latent profile analysis of Chinese EFL learners’ enjoyment and anxiety in reading and writing: associations with imaginative capacity and story continuation writing performance
  27. Effects of monolingual and bilingual subtitles on L2 vocabulary acquisition
  28. Task complexity, task repetition, and L2 writing complexity: exploring interactions in the TBLT domain
  29. Expansion of verb-argument construction repertoires in L2 English writing
  30. Immediate versus delayed prompts, field dependence and independence cognitive style and L2 development
  31. Aural vocabulary, orthographic vocabulary, and listening comprehension
  32. The use of metadiscourse by secondary-level Chinese learners of English in examination scripts: insights from a corpus-based study
  33. Scoping review of research methodologies across language studies with deaf and hard-of-hearing multilingual learners
  34. Exploring immediate and prolonged effects of collaborative writing on young learners’ texts: L2 versus FL
  35. Discrepancy in prosodic disambiguation strategies between Chinese EFL learners and native English speakers
  36. Exploring the state of research on motivation in second language learning: a review and a reliability generalization meta-analysis
  37. Japanese complaint responses in textbook dialogues and ordinary conversations: learning objects to expand interactional repertoires
Heruntergeladen am 14.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2022-0100/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen