Comparative analysis of written corrective feedback strategies: a linear growth modeling approach

References

Ahmadi, Darush, Parviz Maftoon & Ali Gholami Mehrdad. 2012. Investigating the effects of two types of feedback on EFL students’ writing. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 46. 2590–2595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.529.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Tatiana Nekrasova & Brad Horn. 2011. The effectiveness of feedback for L1-Engish and L2-writing development: A meta-analysis. ETS Research Report (RR-11-05). New Jersey: ETS.10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02241.xSuche in Google Scholar

Bitchener, John. 2008. Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 17. 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Bitchener, John & Ute Knoch. 2010. Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 19. 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Daniel. 2017. The interaction between grammatical knowledge and explicitness in L2 written corrective feedback (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 10281417).Suche in Google Scholar

Chandler, Jean. 2003. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12. 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(03)00038-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Lim See & Willy A. Renandya. 2020. Efficacy of written corrective feedback in writing instruction: A meta-analysis. TESL-EJ 24(3). 1–26.Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen, Jacob. 1992. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112(1). 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.Suche in Google Scholar

Crosthwaite, Peter. 2017. Does EAP writing instruction reduce L2 errors? Evidence from a longitudinal corpus of L2 EAP essays and reports. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 56(3). 315–343. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-0129.Suche in Google Scholar

DeKeyser, Robert. 2014. Skill acquisition theory. In Bill VanPatten & Jessica Williams (eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. An introduction, 94–112. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

DeKeyser, Robert. 2007. Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511667275Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2009. A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal 63(2). 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2010. A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32. 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263109990544.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod, Younghee Sheen, Mihoko Murakami & Hide Takashima. 2008. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System 36. 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod & Natsuko Shintani. 2013. Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203796580Suche in Google Scholar

Farrokhi, Farahman & Simin Sattarpour. 2012. The effects of direct written corrective feedback on improvement of grammatical accuracy of high accuracy of high proficient L2 learners. World Journal of Education 2. 49–56.10.5430/wje.v2n2p49Suche in Google Scholar

Fathman, Ann & Elizabeth Whalley. 1990. Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In Barbara Kroll (ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom, 178–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524551.016Suche in Google Scholar

Ferris, Danna R. 2006. Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In Ken Hyland & Fiona Hyland (eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues, 81–104. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524742.007Suche in Google Scholar

Ferris, Danna R. 2004. The “Grammar Correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (And what do we do in the meantime‥‥?). Journal of Second Language Writing 13. 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Ferris, Danna & Barrie Roberts. 2001. Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing 10. 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00039-x.Suche in Google Scholar

Fukuta, Junya, Tamura Yu & Yusaku Kawaguchi. 2019. Written languaging with indirect feedback in writing revision: Is feedback always effective? Language Awareness 28(1). 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1567742.Suche in Google Scholar

Guénette, Danielle. 2007. Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 16. 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.01.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken & Fiona Hyland. 2006. Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524742Suche in Google Scholar

Lalande, John F.II. 1982. Reducing composition errors: An experiment. The Modern Language Journal 66. 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1982.tb06973.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Shaofeng. 2010. The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language and Learning 60(2). 309–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Shaofeng & Alyssa Vuono. 2019. Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System. System 84. 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.05.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Lightbown, Patsy. 2007. Fair trade: Two-Wa bilingual education. ELIA 7. 9–34.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Qiandi & Dan Brown. 2015. Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 30. 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.011.Suche in Google Scholar

Master, Peter. 1995. Consciousness raising and article pedagogy. In Diane Belcher & George Braine (eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Suche in Google Scholar

Master, Peter. 1987. A cross-linguistic interlanguage analysis of the acquisition of the English article system. UCLA: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Nguyen, Minh Thi Thuy, H T Do, T T Pham & A T Nguyen. 2018. The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 pragmatics: An eight month investigation. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 56(3). 345–375.10.1515/iral-2015-0059Suche in Google Scholar

Pawlak, Miroslaw. 2014. Error correction in the foreign language classroom: Reconsidering the issues. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-38436-3Suche in Google Scholar

Pica, Teresa. 1983. Methods of morpheme quantification: Their effect on the interpretation of second language data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6(1). 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100000309.Suche in Google Scholar

Pienemann, Manfred. 1989. Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistic 10. 52–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.52.Suche in Google Scholar

Rassaei, Ehsan. 2021. Effects of dynamic and non-dynamic corrective feedback on EFL writing accuracy during dyadic and small group interactions. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59(2). 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-0044.Suche in Google Scholar

Raudenbush, Stephen W. & Anthony S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Robb, Thomas, Steven Ross & Ian Shortreed. 1986. Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly 20. 83–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586390.Suche in Google Scholar

Rubin, Donald B. 1978. Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. Annals of Statistics 6. 34–58. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344064.Suche in Google Scholar

Russell, Jane & Nina Spada. 2006. The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar. A meta-analysis of the research. In John Norris & Lourdes Ortega (eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching, 133–164. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.13.09valSuche in Google Scholar

Schachter, Jacquelyn. 1974. An error in error analysis. Language Learning 2(2). 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00502.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Richard. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11(2). 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Richard. 2001. Attention. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction, 3–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003Suche in Google Scholar

Semke, Harriet. 1984. The effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals 17. 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb01727.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Sheen, Younghee, David Wright & Anna Moldawa. 2009. Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System 34(4). 556–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Shintani, Natsuko & Rod Ellis. 2013. The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing 22. 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011.Suche in Google Scholar

Shintani, Natsuko, Rod Ellis & Wataru Suzuki. 2014. Effects of written feedback and revision on learners’ accuracy in using two English grammatical structures. Language Learning 64. 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12029.Suche in Google Scholar

Stefanou, Charis & Andrea Révész. 2015. Direct written corrective feedback, learner differences, and the acquisition of second language article use for generic and specific plural reference. The Modern Language Journal 99. 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12212.Suche in Google Scholar

StataCorp. 2019. Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station: StataCorp LP.Suche in Google Scholar

Suh, Bo-Ram. 2014. The effectiveness of direct and indirect coded written feedback in English as a foreign language. Language Research 50(3). 795–814.Suche in Google Scholar

Thomas, Margaret. 1989. The acquisition of English articles by first- and second-language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 10. 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716400008663.Suche in Google Scholar

Trademan, Jacqueline Enid. 2002. The acquisition of the English article system by native speakers of Spanish and Japanese: A cross-linguistic comparison. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico.Suche in Google Scholar

Truscott, John. 1996. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46. 327–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Truscott, John. 1999. The case for “The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing 8. 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80124-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Truscott, John. 2004. Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing 13. 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.05.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Truscott, John. 2007. The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing 16. 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Beuningen, Catherine G., Nivja H. De Jong & Folkert Kuiken. 2008. The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners’ written accuracy. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics 156. 279–296. https://doi.org/10.2143/itl.156.0.2034439.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Beuningen, Catherine G., Nivja H. De Jong & Folkert Kuiken. 2012. Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning 62. 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Xin. 2017. The effects of corrective feedback on Chinese learners’ writing accuracy: A quantitative analysis in an EFL context. World Journal of Education 7(2). 74–88. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v7n2p74.Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, Jessica. 2005. Teaching writing in second and foreign language classrooms. New York: McGraw-Hill.Suche in Google Scholar