Home Students’ attitude and motivation towards concept mapping-based prewriting strategies
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Students’ attitude and motivation towards concept mapping-based prewriting strategies

  • Fan Su ORCID logo and Di Zou ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 28, 2022

Abstract

This study proposes two collaborative concept mapping-based prewriting strategies to help Chinese EFL learners with a reading-to-write task—reading an unfinished story and then writing its ending. Collaborative concept mapping enables students to visualize the storyline with the help of peer scaffolding. The two proposed strategies used collaborative fill-in-the-blanks concept maps (CFCM) and collaboratively constructed concept maps (CCCM). Classes 1 (N = 48) and 2 (N = 47) participated in the experiment and respectively learned the strategies of CFCM and CCCM. The collected data included students’ concept maps, reading-to-write products, responses to questionnaires on attitudes and motivation, and learning journals, which were analyzed by t tests, path analysis, and qualitative coding. The results indicated that students using CCCM showed more positive attitudes and higher motivation than those using CFCM; however, the two strategies shared similar effectiveness in developing students’ reading-to-write abilities. Students found the proposed strategies effective in helping them write the story ending.


Corresponding author: Di Zou, The Education University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, E-mail:

References

Atkinson, Dwight, Eton Churchill, Takako Nishino & Hanako Okada. 2007. Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 91(2). 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00539.x.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Chun-Chun, Gwo-Jen Hwang & Yun-Fang Tu. 2022. Roles, applications, and trends of concept map-supported learning: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of publications from 1992 to 2020 in selected educational technology journals. Interactive Learning Environments. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2027457.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Peichin, Chin-Chung Tsai & Pin-ju Chen. 2020. Organization strategies in EFL expository essays in a content-based language learning course. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 29(2). 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00464-2.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Kang. 2019. 高考英语启用读后续写题型的效果验证研究 [A validation study on the continuation task in the national matriculation English test]. Foreign Language Teaching in Schools 11. 1–6.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Wenting & Shulin Yu. 2019. A longitudinal case study of changes in students’ attitudes, participation, and learning in collaborative writing. System 82(2019). 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.005.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Creswell, John W. & Timothy C. Guetterman. 2019. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Gaynor, James. 2020. Peer review in the classroom: Student perceptions, peer feedback quality and the role of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45(5). 758–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1697424.Search in Google Scholar

Gardner, Robert C. 1985. Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. In Howard Giles (ed.), The social psychology of language, vol. 4. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Haugwitz, Marion, John C. Nesbit & Angela Sandmann. 2010. Cognitive ability and the instructional efficacy of collaborative concept mapping. Learning and Individual Differences 20(5). 536–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.004.Search in Google Scholar

Hwang, Gwo-Jen & Hsun-Fang Chang. 2011. A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education 56(4). 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.002.Search in Google Scholar

Hwang, Gwo-Jen, Shao-Chen Chang, Yanjie Song & Min-Chuan Hsieh. 2021. Powering up flipped learning: An online learning environment with a concept map-guided problem-posing strategy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 37(2). 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12499.Search in Google Scholar

Islim, Omer Faruk. 2018. Technology-supported collaborative concept maps in classrooms. Active Learning in Higher Education 19(2). 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417723231.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Yongjin. 2013. Collaborative concept mapping as a pre-writing strategy for L2 learning: A Korean application. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 3(2). 254. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2013.v3.275.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Yongjin & Sungdai Cho. 2010. Using concept map prewriting strategies in Korean writing classes. Korean Language in America 15(2010). 46–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/42922519.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Feng-Ying, Gwo-Jen Hwang, Pei-Ying Chen & Yu-Jung Lin. 2021. Effects of a concept mapping-based two-tier test strategy on students’ digital game-based learning performances and behavioral patterns. Computers & Education 173(2021). 104293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104293.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Pei-Lin. 2011. A study on the use of computerized concept mapping to assist ESL learners’ writing. Computers & Education 57(4). 2548–2558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.015.Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, Karen P, Jeffrey A. Greene, Carla M. Firetto, Mengyi Li, Nikki G. Lobczowski, Rebekah F. Duke, Liwei Wei & Rachel M. V. Croninger. 2017. Exploring the influence of homogeneous versus heterogeneous grouping on students’ text-based discussions and comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology 51. 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.09.003.Search in Google Scholar

Novak, Joseph D. & Bob D. Gowin. 1984. Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173469Search in Google Scholar

Nobahar, Behnaz, Amir Reza Nemat Tabrizi & Masoud Shaghaghi. 2013. The effect of concept mapping on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ self-efficacy and expository writing accuracy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 3(11). 2117–2127. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.11.2117-2127.Search in Google Scholar

Pishghadam, Reza & Afsaneh Ghanizadeh. 2006. On the impact of concept mapping as a prewriting activity on EFL learners’ writing ability. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics 9(2). 101–126.Search in Google Scholar

Tong, Xiuhong, Joyce Lok Yin Kwan, Shelly Xiuli Tong & S. Hélène Deacon. 2021. How Chinese–English bilingual fourth graders draw on syntactic awareness in reading comprehension: Within-and cross-language effects. Reading Research Quarterly 57(2). 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.400.Search in Google Scholar

Vonkova, Hana, Jane Jones, Angie Moore, Irem Altinkalp & Hasan Selcuk. 2021. A review of recent research in EFL motivation: Research trends, emerging methodologies, and diversity of researched populations. System 103(2021). 102622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102622.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Chuming. 2012. Use of the continuation task to improve L2 learning efficiency. Foreign Language World 152(5). 2–7.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Chuming & Min Wang. 2015. Effect of alignment on L2 written production. Applied Linguistics 36(5). 503–526.10.1093/applin/amt051Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Ling, Jame D. Basham & Sohyun Yang. 2020. Understanding the implementation of personalized learning: A research synthesis. Educational Research Review 31(2021). 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100339.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-07-04
Accepted: 2022-10-15
Published Online: 2022-10-28
Published in Print: 2024-06-25

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. Consolidating EFL content and vocabulary learning via interactive reading
  4. Understanding salient trajectories and emerging profiles in the development of Chinese learners’ motivation: a growth mixture modeling approach
  5. Multilingual pedagogies in first versus foreign language contexts: a cross-country study of language teachers
  6. Classroom assessment and learning motivation: insights from secondary school EFL classrooms
  7. Interculturality and Islam in Indonesia’s high-school EFL classrooms
  8. Collaborative writing in an EFL secondary setting: the role of task complexity
  9. Spanish heritage speakers’ processing of lexical stress
  10. Effectiveness of second language collocation instruction: a meta-analysis
  11. Understanding the Usefulness of E-Portfolios: Linking Artefacts, Reflection, and Validation
  12. Syntactic prediction in L2 learners: evidence from English disjunction processing
  13. The cognitive construction-grammar approach to teaching the Chinese Ba construction in a foreign language classroom
  14. The predictive roles of enjoyment, anxiety, willingness to communicate on students’ performance in English public speaking classes
  15. Speaking proficiency development in EFL classrooms: measuring the differential effect of TBLT and PPP teaching approaches
  16. L2 textbook input and L2 written production: a case of Korean locative postposition–verb construction
  17. What does the processing of chunks by learners of Chinese tell us? An acceptability judgment investigation
  18. Comparative analysis of written corrective feedback strategies: a linear growth modeling approach
  19. Enjoyment in language teaching: a study into EFL teachers’ subjectivities
  20. Students’ attitude and motivation towards concept mapping-based prewriting strategies
  21. Pronunciation pedagogy in English as a foreign language teacher education programs in Vietnam
  22. The role of language aptitude probed within extensive instruction experience: morphosyntactic knowledge of advanced users of L2 English
  23. The impact of different glossing conditions on the learning of EFL single words and collocations in reading
  24. Patterns of motivational beliefs among high-, medium-, and low-achieving English learners in China
  25. The effect of linguistic choices in note-taking on academic listening performance: a pedagogical translanguaging perspective
  26. A latent profile analysis of Chinese EFL learners’ enjoyment and anxiety in reading and writing: associations with imaginative capacity and story continuation writing performance
  27. Effects of monolingual and bilingual subtitles on L2 vocabulary acquisition
  28. Task complexity, task repetition, and L2 writing complexity: exploring interactions in the TBLT domain
  29. Expansion of verb-argument construction repertoires in L2 English writing
  30. Immediate versus delayed prompts, field dependence and independence cognitive style and L2 development
  31. Aural vocabulary, orthographic vocabulary, and listening comprehension
  32. The use of metadiscourse by secondary-level Chinese learners of English in examination scripts: insights from a corpus-based study
  33. Scoping review of research methodologies across language studies with deaf and hard-of-hearing multilingual learners
  34. Exploring immediate and prolonged effects of collaborative writing on young learners’ texts: L2 versus FL
  35. Discrepancy in prosodic disambiguation strategies between Chinese EFL learners and native English speakers
  36. Exploring the state of research on motivation in second language learning: a review and a reliability generalization meta-analysis
  37. Japanese complaint responses in textbook dialogues and ordinary conversations: learning objects to expand interactional repertoires
Downloaded on 20.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2022-0134/html
Scroll to top button