Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Understanding the Usefulness of E-Portfolios: Linking Artefacts, Reflection, and Validation

  • Ricky Lam is Associate Professor and Associate Department Head in the Department of Education Studies at Hong Kong Baptist University. Ricky is the Past President of Hong Kong Association for Applied Linguistics, 2018–2020. He teaches a range of undergraduate and postgraduate courses. His research interests include L2 writing assessment, digital portfolios, and language assessment literacy. His publications have appeared in Assessing Writing, System, Language Testing, TESOL Quarterly, TESOL Journal, ELT Journal, and other international journals. Ricky is also the author of Using Portfolios in Language Teaching (RELC New Portfolio Series 4) (2019, SEAMEO Regional Language Centre).

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 22, 2022

Abstract

E-Portfolios in language education have emerged over two decades. Despite their popularity as an instructional tool, many cast doubt on their usefulness in second language classrooms, especially when scholars are not clear about how e-Portfolio artefacts can be converted into reliable learning evidence by students’ active reflection and validation via multimedia feedback to inform language teaching and learning. This paper examines the usefulness of e-Portfolios by looking into how teachers attempt the tool to connect portfolio evidence, rationalisation, and feedback. Three novice teachers with three-year school experience (Jill, Jamie, and Jackie) undertook action research projects in their secondary schools. They participated in the study by trying out their individual e-Portfolio programmes for a year. Qualitative data, including two classroom observations and three reflective journal entries per teacher were collected by the author. Content analysis of qualitative data (i.e., lesson observation transcripts and journal entries) was performed deductively. The findings showed that except Jamie, Jill and Jackie hardly enhanced the usefulness of e-Portfolios, because they could not empower students to link artefacts, reflection, and validation properly owing to multiple reasons. Pedagogical implications concerning how to scale up the usefulness of e-Portfolio in L2 classroom contexts are discussed.


Corresponding author: Ricky Lam, AAB 811, Department of Education Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, HKSAR, E-mail:

Funding source: Standing Committee on Language Education and Research (SCOLAR)

Award Identifier / Grant number: EDB(LE)/P&R/EL/203/12

About the author

Ricky Lam

Ricky Lam is Associate Professor and Associate Department Head in the Department of Education Studies at Hong Kong Baptist University. Ricky is the Past President of Hong Kong Association for Applied Linguistics, 2018–2020. He teaches a range of undergraduate and postgraduate courses. His research interests include L2 writing assessment, digital portfolios, and language assessment literacy. His publications have appeared in Assessing Writing, System, Language Testing, TESOL Quarterly, TESOL Journal, ELT Journal, and other international journals. Ricky is also the author of Using Portfolios in Language Teaching (RELC New Portfolio Series 4) (2019, SEAMEO Regional Language Centre).

  1. Research funding: This work was funded by the Language Fund under Research and Development Projects 2021–22 of the Standing Committee on Language Education and Research (SCOLAR), Hong Kong SAR. The project reference number is (EDB(LE)/P&R/EL/203/12).

  2. Competing interests: None.

References

Allal, Linda. 2020. Assessment and the co-regulation of learning in the classroom. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 27(4). 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1609411.Search in Google Scholar

Aydin, Selami. 2014. EFL writers’ attitudes and perceptions toward E-Portfolio use. TechTrends 58(2). 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0737-6.Search in Google Scholar

Aygün, Sibel & Selami Aydin. 2016. The use of e-portfolio in EFL writing: A review of literature. ELT Research Journal 5(3). 205–217.Search in Google Scholar

Bader, Monika, Burner Tony, Iversen Sarah Hoem & Varga Zoltan. 2019. Student perspectives on formative feedback as part of writing portfolios. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44(7). 1017–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1564811.Search in Google Scholar

Barrett, Helen. 2007. Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT Initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 50(6). 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.50.6.2.Search in Google Scholar

Barrot, Jessie S. 2021. Effects of Facebook-based e-Portfolio on ESL learners’ writing performance. Language, Culture and Curriculum 34(1). 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1745822.Search in Google Scholar

Belgrad, Susan F. 2013. Portfolios and e-portfolios: Student reflection, self-assessment, and goal-setting in the learning process. In James H. McMillan (ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment, 331–346. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.10.4135/9781452218649.n19Search in Google Scholar

Black, Paul & Wiliam Dylan. 2018. Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 25(6). 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807.Search in Google Scholar

Burner, Tony. 2014. The potential formative benefits of portfolio assessment in second and foreign language writing contexts: A review of the literature. Studies in Educational Evaluation 43. 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.03.002.Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Philippa. (2006). A review of the literature on portfolios and electronic portfolios. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ (accessed 26 December 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Cambridge, Darren, Cambridge Barbara & Yancey Kathleen (eds.). 2009. Electronic portfolios 2.0: Emergent research on implementation and impact. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus.Search in Google Scholar

Carless, David & Winstone Naomi. 2020. Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Chi-Cheng, Chaoyun Liang, Chou Pao-Nan & Liao Yueh-Mai. 2018. Using e-Portfolio for learning goal setting to facilitate self-regulated learning of high school students. Behaviour & Information Technology 37(12). 1237–1251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1496275.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Peggy & Bonner Sarah. 2020. A framework for classroom assessment, learning and self-regulation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 27(4). 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1619515.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Gary & Juliana Chau. 2009. Digital video for fostering self-reflection in an ePortfolio environment. Learning, Media and Technology 34(4). 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880903338614.Search in Google Scholar

Chuang, Hsueh-Hua. 2010. Weblog-based electronic portfolios for student teachers in Taiwan. Educational Technology Research and Development 58(2). 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9098-1.Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Amanda, DeLuca Christopher, Michael Holden & MacGregor Stephen. 2022. Emergency assessment: Rethinking classroom practices and priorities amid remote teaching. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2069084.Search in Google Scholar

Cummins, Patricia W. & Céline Davesne. 2009. Using electronic portfolios for second language assessment. The Modern Language Journal 93. 848–867. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00977.x.Search in Google Scholar

De Bruin, H., M. van der Schaaf, A. Oosterbaan & F. Prins. 2012. Secondary-school students’ motivation for portfolio reflection. Irish Educational Studies 31(4). 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2012.673907.Search in Google Scholar

Deneen, Charles Christopher, Brown Gavin Thomas Lumsden & Carless David. 2018. Students’ conceptions of eportfolios as assessment and technology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 55(4). 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1281752.Search in Google Scholar

Gan, Zhengdong & Constant Leung. 2020. Illustrating formative assessment in task-based language teaching. ELT Journal 74(1). 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccz048.Search in Google Scholar

Händel, Marion, Wimmer Bastian & Ziegler Albert. 2020. E-portfolio use and its effects on exam performance – A field study. Studies in Higher Education 45(2). 258–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1510388.Search in Google Scholar

Isbell, Daniel R. & Kremmel Benjamin. 2020. Test review: Current options in at-home language proficiency tests for making high-stakes decisions. Language Testing 37(4). 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220943483.Search in Google Scholar

Karlin, Michael, Ozogul Gamze, Miles Stacy & Heide Saul. 2016. The practical application of e-Portfolios in K-12 classrooms: An exploration of three Web 2.0 tools by three teachers. TechTrends 60. 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0071-2.Search in Google Scholar

Kimball, Miles. 2005. Database e-portfolio systems: A critical appraisal. Computers and Composition 22(4). 434–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2005.08.003.Search in Google Scholar

Lam, Ricky. 2013. Two portfolio systems: EFL students’ perceptions of writing ability, text improvement, and feedback. Assessing Writing 18(2). 132–153.10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.003Search in Google Scholar

Lam, Ricky. 2015. Convergence and divergence of process and portfolio approaches to L2 writing instruction: Issues and implications. RELC Journal 46(3). 293–308.10.1177/0033688215597119Search in Google Scholar

Lam, Ricky. 2019. Using portfolios in language teaching (New portfolio series 4). Singapore: SEAMEO RELC.Search in Google Scholar

Lam, Ricky. 2020. Why reinvent the wheel? E-portfolios are for learning. ELT Journal 74(4). 488–491.10.1093/elt/ccaa049Search in Google Scholar

Lam, Ricky. 2021. Using ePortfolios to promote assessment of, for, as learning in EFL writing. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL 10(1). 101–120.Search in Google Scholar

Lam, Ricky. 2022. Assessing creative writing formatively and summatively with e-Portfolios: A case study in Hong Kong. In B. Chamcharatsri & A. Iida (eds.), International perspectives on using creative writing in second language education: Supporting language learners’ proficiency, identity and creative expression, 171–181. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003183914-12Search in Google Scholar

Nicolaidou, Iolie. 2013. E-portfolios supporting primary students’ writing performance and peer feedback. Computers & Education 68. 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.004.Search in Google Scholar

Nicol, David, Serbati Anna & Tracchi Matteo. 2019. Competence development and portfolios: Promoting reflection through peer review. AISHE-J 11(2). 1–13.Search in Google Scholar

O’Byrne, Barbara & Murrell Stacey. 2014. Evaluating multimodal literacies in student blogs. British Journal of Educational Technology 45(5). 926–940. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12093.Search in Google Scholar

Reynolds, Candyce & Judith Patton. 2014. Leveraging the ePortfolio for integrative learning: A faculty guide to classroom practices for transforming student learning. Stylus. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ct2-library/194.Search in Google Scholar

Saeed, Murad Abdu & Al Qunayeer Huda Suleiman. 2022. Exploring teacher interactive e-feedback on students’ writing through Google Docs: Factors promoting interactivity and potential for learning. The Language Learning Journal 50(3). 360–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1786711.Search in Google Scholar

Sharifi, Maryam, Soleimani Hassan & Jafarigohar Manoochehr. 2017. E-portfolio evaluation and vocabulary learning: Moving from pedagogy to andragogy. British Journal of Educational Technology 48(6). 1441–1450. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12479.Search in Google Scholar

Siu, Fiona. 2013. The incorporation of ePortfolios into five EFL courses – Barriers encountered in the diffusion of technology. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 24(2). 211–231.Search in Google Scholar

Wuetherick, Brad & Dickinson John. 2015. Why ePortfolios? Student perceptions of ePortfolio use in continuing education learning environments. International Journal of ePortfolio 5(1). 39–53.Search in Google Scholar

Yancey, Kathleen Blake. 2004. Postmodernism, palimpsest, and portfolios: Theoretical issues in the representation of student work. College Composition and Communication 55(4). 738–761.10.2307/4140669Search in Google Scholar

Yancey, Kathleen Blake. 2009. Electronic portfolios a decade into the twenty-first century: What we know, what we need to know. Peer Review 11(1). 28–32.Search in Google Scholar

Yancey, Kathleen Blake. 2015. Grading ePortfolios: Tracing two approaches, their advantages, and their disadvantages. Theory Into Practice 54. 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.1076693.Search in Google Scholar

Yancey, Kathleen Blake (ed.). 2016. A rhetoric of reflection. Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Yancey, Kathleen Blake (ed.). 2019. ePortfolio as curriculum: Models and practices for developing students’ ePortfolio literacy. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus.Search in Google Scholar

Yancey, Kathleen Blake, J. McElroy Stephen & Powers Elizabeth. 2015. Composing, networks, and electronic portfolios: Notes toward a theory of assessing eportfolios. In H. A. McKee & D. N. DeVoss (eds.), Digital writing assessment and evaluation, 1–32. Utah State University Press. Available at: https://ccdigitalpress.org/book/dwae.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-03-01
Accepted: 2022-07-25
Published Online: 2022-08-22
Published in Print: 2024-06-25

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. Consolidating EFL content and vocabulary learning via interactive reading
  4. Understanding salient trajectories and emerging profiles in the development of Chinese learners’ motivation: a growth mixture modeling approach
  5. Multilingual pedagogies in first versus foreign language contexts: a cross-country study of language teachers
  6. Classroom assessment and learning motivation: insights from secondary school EFL classrooms
  7. Interculturality and Islam in Indonesia’s high-school EFL classrooms
  8. Collaborative writing in an EFL secondary setting: the role of task complexity
  9. Spanish heritage speakers’ processing of lexical stress
  10. Effectiveness of second language collocation instruction: a meta-analysis
  11. Understanding the Usefulness of E-Portfolios: Linking Artefacts, Reflection, and Validation
  12. Syntactic prediction in L2 learners: evidence from English disjunction processing
  13. The cognitive construction-grammar approach to teaching the Chinese Ba construction in a foreign language classroom
  14. The predictive roles of enjoyment, anxiety, willingness to communicate on students’ performance in English public speaking classes
  15. Speaking proficiency development in EFL classrooms: measuring the differential effect of TBLT and PPP teaching approaches
  16. L2 textbook input and L2 written production: a case of Korean locative postposition–verb construction
  17. What does the processing of chunks by learners of Chinese tell us? An acceptability judgment investigation
  18. Comparative analysis of written corrective feedback strategies: a linear growth modeling approach
  19. Enjoyment in language teaching: a study into EFL teachers’ subjectivities
  20. Students’ attitude and motivation towards concept mapping-based prewriting strategies
  21. Pronunciation pedagogy in English as a foreign language teacher education programs in Vietnam
  22. The role of language aptitude probed within extensive instruction experience: morphosyntactic knowledge of advanced users of L2 English
  23. The impact of different glossing conditions on the learning of EFL single words and collocations in reading
  24. Patterns of motivational beliefs among high-, medium-, and low-achieving English learners in China
  25. The effect of linguistic choices in note-taking on academic listening performance: a pedagogical translanguaging perspective
  26. A latent profile analysis of Chinese EFL learners’ enjoyment and anxiety in reading and writing: associations with imaginative capacity and story continuation writing performance
  27. Effects of monolingual and bilingual subtitles on L2 vocabulary acquisition
  28. Task complexity, task repetition, and L2 writing complexity: exploring interactions in the TBLT domain
  29. Expansion of verb-argument construction repertoires in L2 English writing
  30. Immediate versus delayed prompts, field dependence and independence cognitive style and L2 development
  31. Aural vocabulary, orthographic vocabulary, and listening comprehension
  32. The use of metadiscourse by secondary-level Chinese learners of English in examination scripts: insights from a corpus-based study
  33. Scoping review of research methodologies across language studies with deaf and hard-of-hearing multilingual learners
  34. Exploring immediate and prolonged effects of collaborative writing on young learners’ texts: L2 versus FL
  35. Discrepancy in prosodic disambiguation strategies between Chinese EFL learners and native English speakers
  36. Exploring the state of research on motivation in second language learning: a review and a reliability generalization meta-analysis
  37. Japanese complaint responses in textbook dialogues and ordinary conversations: learning objects to expand interactional repertoires
Downloaded on 4.5.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2022-0052/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button