Startseite Study on the parameters optimization and the microstructure of spot welding joints of 304 stainless steel
Artikel Open Access

Study on the parameters optimization and the microstructure of spot welding joints of 304 stainless steel

  • Hui Liu EMAIL logo , Lei Yu und Dayu Wang
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. März 2025
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Resistance spot welding experiments of 304 stainless steel were performed in this study. Orthogonal test and analysis method were used to carry out the experiments and optimize process parameters based on their effects on tensile shear load and nugget diameter of the spot-welded joint. The microstructure and the defects of spot-welded joints were studied. The highest tensile shear load of joint was 9.529 kN produced at optimum parameters, i.e., electrode force of 3.5 kN, welding current of 6.5 kA, and welding time of eight cycles. Microstructure of the nugget of welded spot joint was columnar dendrite grains which contains austenite and δ-ferrite, and the microstructure of the HAZ region was coarse equiaxed grains of austenite that were induced by different heat inputs. The solidification cracks and shrinkage cavities were observed in resistance spot-welded joints which were produced at higher heat input. These defects seriously reduced the strength of spot-welded joint.

1 Introduction

304 austenitic stainless steel has excellent properties, good corrosion resistance, high tensile strength, low yield strength, high ductility, and easy to fabricate, which has been widely used in rail vehicles fabrication and equipment manufacturing for common chemical and food industries [1,2,3]. 304 stainless steel can also be used in furnace and jet engines, from cryogenic to high temperature application [4]. When stainless steel is used for the construction of a structure, welding and joining procedures are required. According to recent studies, some methods for austenitic stainless steel welding are studied such as laser-arc hybrid welding [5], laser beam welding [6], gas tungsten arc welding [7], and electron beam welding [8]. Resistance spot welding is one of the most important methods in manufacturing industry among the joining methods for structural components. At present, there are only few research works that have focused on the spot welding process of 304 austenitic steel and few results available about the microstructure and defect of welded spots. To explore the influence of parameters on the tensile shear load and microstructure evolution is very important. In this study, orthogonal test and analysis method has been applied to optimal resistance spot welding process parameters for 304 stainless steel. And its weldability for resistance spot welding has been studied by comparing the metallurgical properties and microstructure of the base metal and the welded spot nugget.

2 Experimental materials and methods

The original rolled sheet of 304 stainless steel used in this experiment was 1 mm thick. Major chemical compositions and mechanical properties of experimental materials are presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Parallel to the rolling direction of the plate, the specimens were cut in dimensions of 80 × 20 × 1 mm. The geometry and configuration of the specimens are shown in Figure 1. In order to clean the surfaces of the specimens, alcohol and acetone were used to wash the greasy dirt before the experiment. Specimens were subjected to weld by DN-100 spot welding machine. The tensile tests were performed using a universal testing machine WDW-200, whose strain rate is controlled by a microprocessor system. Spot welding tests were carried out with the Cu–Cr alloy electrode tips with a diameter of 5 mm.

Table 1

Chemical composition of base metal

Element C Cr Ni Mo Mn Si P S Fe
Wt% ≤0.08 18~20 8~11 2~3 ≤2.0 ≤0.75 ≤0.03 ≤0.035 Balance
Table 2

Mechanical properties of base metal

Tensile strength σ b/MPa Yield strength σ s/MPa Elongation δ (%) Vickers hardness HV
≥520 ≥205 ≥40 ≤200
Figure 1 
               Geometry and configuration of the specimens.
Figure 1

Geometry and configuration of the specimens.

3 Optimization methods

3.1 Orthogonal tests

The welding experiments were designed by the orthogonal test methods in this study in order to obtain optimal process parameters of resistance spot welding. The optimal parameters set can be selected and the main effects of these parameters in order of priority can be obtained by appropriate methods [9,10]. There were three controllable variable factors and which factor has three levels. Electrode force was selected as A, welding current was selected as B, welding time was selected as C in the end. It was assumed that there was no interaction among these factors. Three variable factors and their three levels are shown in Table 3. The welding tests were implemented using the orthogonal array L9 (34). As shown as in Table 4, the tensile shear load of welded joints and the nugget diameter of welded spots were selected as experiment index y. Table 4 also shows the arrangement and data of these experiments. Each row in Table 4 represents a set of experiments, and each set of experiments was repeated eight times. Four welded joints were used for the tensile shear test, the others were used for measuring the welded spot nugget diameter and analysis of microstructure and welding defects. The values for analysis were the mean value of four experimental results.

Table 3

Variable parameters and their levels

Parameter Electrode force A/kN Welding current B/kA Welding time C/cycle
Level 1 3.0 5.5 6
Level 2 3.5 6.0 7
Level 3 4.0 6.5 8
Table 4

Orthogonal experimental design and results

Number Electrode force/kN Experiment parameters Error Results (y)
Welding current/kA Welding time/cycle Tensile shear load/kN Nugget diameter/mm
1 1 1 1 1 7.272 5.1
2 1 2 2 2 7.465 5.1
3 1 3 3 3 7.270 4.9
4 2 1 2 3 8.229 5.2
5 2 2 3 1 8.030 5.2
6 2 3 1 2 9.529 5.4
7 3 1 3 2 8.659 5.2
8 3 2 1 3 6.991 4.9
9 3 3 2 1 7.863 5.1

The experiment results and analysis are shown in Table 5. Section numbers K 1, K 2, and K 3 represent the average values of factors A, B, and C under levels 1, 2, and 3. Among K 1, K 2, and K 3, the difference value between the maximum and the minimum is expressed by the symbol R. The larger the R value is, the greater the influence of this parameter on nugget diameter and tensile shear load is.

Table 5

Analysis of orthogonal experiment

Source K 1 K 2 K 3 R f S V F
Tensile shear load A 7.336 8.596 7.838 1.260 2 2.416 1.208 1.306
B 8.053 7.498 8.221 0.723 2 0.866 0.433 0.468
C 7.931 7.852 7.965 0.113 2 0.027 0.0135 0.015
Error 7.721 8.551 7.497 1.066 2 1.850 0.925
Total 8 5.159
Nugget diameter A 5.03 5.27 5.07 0.24 2 0.096 0.048 1.157
B 5.17 5.07 5.13 0.10 2 0.016 0.008 0.193
C 5.13 5.13 5.10 0.03 2 0.003 0.0015 0.036
Error 5.13 5.23 5.00 0.23 2 0.083 0.0415
Total 8 0.198

From the following equations, the degree of freedom f, the sum of square S, the mean square V and F were obtained, which are listed in Table 5.

(1) S ( A , B , C ) = 1 r i = 1 m j = 1 r y i j 2 T 2 n ,

(2) S T = i = 1 n ( x i x ¯ ) 2 = S A + S B + S C + S E ,

(3) V = S f ,

(4) F = S / f S E / f E .

The number of each level r = 3, the number of levels m = 3, the total number of tests n = 9, and T is the sum value of the experiment results.

3.2 Results and discussion

As can be seen, the peak tensile shear load of the spot-welded joint was 9.529 kN and the largest nugget diameter was 5.4 mm, respectively. Figure 2(a) shows K 1, K 2, and K 3 of each factor, and gives the effects of test levels on the tensile shear load. Figure 2(b) shows K 1, K 2, and K 3 of each factor, and gives the effects of test levels on the nugget diameter. It was shown that the tensile shear load of spot-welded joints changed with the test level of the electrode force rapidly, while they changed with the test level of the welding current and welding time slowly. The same result was obtained for the nugget diameter. Therefore, the tensile shear load and nugget diameter are changed with electrode force sensitively. Table 5 shows the values of R of factor A, B, and C. As shown as the values of R, the order of the effect of three factors on tensile shear load was R A > R B > R C, similar to that on nugget diameter. It is shown in Figure 2 that the optimum processing parameter set was electrode force of 3.5 kN, welding current of 6.5 kA and welding time of eight cycles. In order to reveal which factor had a more significant effect on the response, the sum of squares S was used to describe the fluctuation of data in this study. V is the mean square of the factors, and the larger the V value, the more significant the influence of this factor on the tensile shear load and nugget diameter of spot-welded joint. The value of V indicates that the order of the effect of three factors is S A > S B > S C , as shown in Table 5. That means influence of electrode force is the greatest, followed by the welding current, and welding time is the smallest. This result is the same as that of the R value. The obtained result shows that the most dominant factor affecting the nugget diameter and tensile shear load of spot-welded joint is the electrode force.

Figure 2 
                  Influence of test levels on tensile shear load and nugget diameter: (a) Tensile shear load of joints and (b) nugget diameter of joints.
Figure 2

Influence of test levels on tensile shear load and nugget diameter: (a) Tensile shear load of joints and (b) nugget diameter of joints.

4 Microstructure of joints

The microstructure of 304 stainless steel joint produced by resistance spot welding in different regions is presented in Figure 3. It is a typical equiaxed crystal of austenitic grains in the base metal as shown in Figure 3(a). Coarse austenitic grains are detected in the HAZ region induced by weld heat input, which is shown in Figure 3(b). The spot-welded joint contains a narrow and fine grain region around the periphery and casting columnar dendrite grain region in the center, which is shown in Figure 3(c). This narrow and fine grain region is a plastic ring, which is a plastic deformation and recrystallization area formed due to high temperature with high electrode pressure in the welding process. It can eliminate the welding defects and improve the mechanical properties. Figure 3(d) shows that obviously directional columnar dendrite grain structure has been produced in the nugget center. As a result, the crystallization begins from the partial melting crystalline grains around the edge of the nugget.

Figure 3 
               Microstructure of spot-welded joint: (a) Region of base metal, (b) region of HAZ, (c) edge of the nugget, and (d) center of the nugget.
Figure 3

Microstructure of spot-welded joint: (a) Region of base metal, (b) region of HAZ, (c) edge of the nugget, and (d) center of the nugget.

Due to the relatively narrow crystallization temperature range of stainless steel, its dendrites can fully grow. The columnar dendrite grows toward the center core along the opposite direction of heat dissipation. During the solidification process of welding stage, cooling rates and temperature gradients of the nugget region are obviously different from the HAZ region and the base metal, so columnar dendrite grain size of the nugget is much bigger than that of the HAZ region and the base metal. The solidification structure of the nugget is also determined by the relationship between the temperature gradient of the liquid phase and the cooling rate during the process of spot welding. Due to the high resistance rate and the poor thermal conductivity, the latent heat of crystallization released during the solidification process will lower the temperature gradient and the cooling rate near the nugget center, leading to a slowdown in the growth rate of the dendrites. Because solidification in the nugget of 304 stainless steel is a non-equilibrium freezing procedure, according to the Fe–Cr–Ni binary phase diagram, the phase precipitated on γ-ferrite boundaries is δ-ferrite.

5 Weld defects analysis

Similar to fusion welding of 304 stainless steel, welding defects formed in the resistance spot-welded joints are hot cracks and shrinkage cavities. It is determined by the thermophysical properties of the austenitic stainless steel. Previous studies showed that the effect of process parameters on welding defects are obviously different. As shown in Figure 4(a), result of the experimental research indicates that cracks in the 304 stainless steel resistance spot-welded joints are mainly solidification cracks. Based on the analysis, it was proved that cracks were mainly determined by electrode force and welding current, since stress condition and component segregation caused by the electrode force and welding current lead to solidification cracks. Due to the increase in heat input when the welding current was up to 6.5 kA, larger columnar and dendritic grains were formed. Because of the formation of continuous intergranular liquid films in the last stage of solidification for the liquid, voids, i.e., solidification cracks will be left at the grain boundaries in the region of the solidus. As shown in Figure 4(b), shrinkage porosity and shrinkage cavity are significantly related to the expansion and contraction of metals and the forging pressure during the melting and solidification stages. In spot welding, the internal pressure is caused by volume expansion caused by metal liquefaction. When the electrode force is lower than 3.5 kN and welding current is higher than 6.5 kA, the plastic ring opens since the internal pressure is too large, and the splash will be produced. The volume of liquid metal decreases, and the nugget cannot be completely filled with the liquid metal, then cracks and shrinkage cavities will occur during solidification stage. The tensile and the fatigue properties of the spot-welded joints would be seriously reduced by these welding defects.

Figure 4 
               Defects of 304 stainless steel in spot welded joint: (a) Solidification crack and (b) cavity of shrinkage.
Figure 4

Defects of 304 stainless steel in spot welded joint: (a) Solidification crack and (b) cavity of shrinkage.

6 Conclusion

Spot resistance welding tests were performed for 304 stainless steel, mechanical properties and microstructure of spot-welded joints produced at different process parameters were investigated and the conclusions are summarized as follows:

  1. The optimum spot welding process parameters for 304 stainless steel are electrode force of 3.5 kN, welding current of 6.5 kA and welding time of eight cycles. The peak tensile shear load of the resistance spot welded joints was 9.529 kN under the optimum welding parameters.

  2. Austenite with coarse grains was obtained in HAZ region of 304 stainless steel spot-welded joints, austenite and δ-ferrite with columnar dendrite grains were obtained in the nugget center, and a narrow plastic ring with fine grains was formed around the periphery of the nugget. Dissimilarity of grain morphology distribution in the joint occurred due to the difference in pressures, cooling rates, and temperature gradients at each region during the solidification of the welded metal.

  3. Solidification cracks and shrinkage cavities were typical defects in the 304 stainless steel spot-welded joints. These defects were caused by lower electrode force and higher welding current during welding process, which seriously reduced the tensile and the fatigue properties of the joints.

Acknowledgements

The research was financially supported by Innovation Team Project Funding of Changchun Institute of Technology (Grant No. 320230001).

  1. Funding information: The research was financially supported by Innovation Team Project Funding of Changchun Institute of Technology (Grant No. 320230001).

  2. Author contributions: Hui Liu: methodology, conceptualization, writing – original draft, and formal analysis. Lei Yu: conceptualization, writing – review and editing, funding acquisition, resources, and supervision. Dayu Wang: formal analysis, investigation, and writing – review and editing.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: Not applicable.

References

[1] Klančnika, G., D. Steiner Petrovič, and J. Medveda. Thermodynamic calculation of phase equilibria in stainless steels. Mining and Metallurgy, Vol. 48, No. 3, 2012, pp. 383–390.10.2298/JMMB121119048KSuche in Google Scholar

[2] Lo, K. H., C. H. Shekand J. K. L. Lai. Recent developments in stainless steels. Materials Science and Engineering R, Vol. 65, 2009, pp. 39–104.10.1016/j.mser.2009.03.001Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Elmer, J. W., J. Wong, and T. Ressler. In-situ observations of phase transformations during solidification and cooling of austenitic stainless steel welds using time-resolved X-Ray diffraction. Scripta Materialia, Vol. 43, 2000, pp. 751–757.10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00481-4Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Nafar Dehsorkhi, R., S. Sabooni, A. Eslami, F. Karimzadeh, and B. Sadeghian. Study on effect of laser welding parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of ultrafine grained 304L stainless steel. Journal of Ultrafine Grained and Nanostructured Materials, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2016, pp. 120–127.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Casalino, G., S. Luisa Campanelli, and A. Domenico Ludovico. Laser-arc hybrid welding of wrought to selective laser molten stainless steel. Advance Manufacture Technology, Vol. 68, 2013, pp. 209–216.10.1007/s00170-012-4721-zSuche in Google Scholar

[6] Cerrone, C., F. Chiti, and M. Sacchi. Application of laser welding to stainless steel light rail vehicle. Welding in the world, Vol. 52, No. 7, 2008, pp. 27–32.10.1007/BF03266649Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Hsieh, C. C., T. C. Chang, D. Y. Lin, M. C. Chen, and W. Wu. Precipitation behavior of σ phase in fusion zone of dissimilar stainless steel. Metals and Materials, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2007, pp. 411–416.10.1007/BF03027877Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Krasnorutskyi, S., H. Pries, and M. Zinke. Metallurgical influence of multi-beam techology on duplex stainless steel welds. Weld world, Vol. 57, No. 4, 2013, pp. 487–494.10.1007/s40194-013-0042-6Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Jixiang, Z. Statistics method for quality control, China Statistics Press, Beijing, 1999.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Darwish, S. M.and S. D. Al-Dekhial. Statistical model for spot welding of commercial aluminum sheets. International Journal of Machine Tool & Manufacture, Vol. 39, 1999, pp. 1589–1610.10.1016/S0890-6955(99)00010-3Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-04-16
Revised: 2024-05-28
Accepted: 2024-06-04
Published Online: 2025-03-14

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. Endpoint carbon content and temperature prediction model in BOF steelmaking based on posterior probability and intra-cluster feature weight online dynamic feature selection
  3. Thermal conductivity of lunar regolith simulant using a thermal microscope
  4. Multiobjective optimization of EDM machining parameters of TIB2 ceramic materials using regression and gray relational analysis
  5. Research on the magnesium reduction process by integrated calcination in vacuum
  6. Microstructure stability and softening resistance of a novel Cr-Mo-V hot work die steel
  7. Effect of bonding temperature on tensile behaviors and toughening mechanism of W/(Ti/Ta/Ti) multilayer composites
  8. Exploring the selective enrichment of vanadium–titanium magnetite concentrate through metallization reduction roasting under the action of additives
  9. Effect of solid solution rare earth (La, Ce, Y) on the mechanical properties of α-Fe
  10. Impact of variable thermal conductivity on couple-stress Casson fluid flow through a microchannel with catalytic cubic reactions
  11. Effects of hydrothermal carbonization process parameters on phase composition and the microstructure of corn stalk hydrochars
  12. Wide temperature range protection performance of Zr–Ta–B–Si–C ceramic coating under cyclic oxidation and ablation environments
  13. Influence of laser power on mechanical and microstructural behavior of Nd: YAG laser welding of Incoloy alloy 800
  14. Aspects of thermal radiation for the second law analysis of magnetized Darcy–Forchheimer movement of Maxwell nanomaterials with Arrhenius energy effects
  15. Use of artificial neural network for optimization of irreversibility analysis in radiative Cross nanofluid flow past an inclined surface with convective boundary conditions
  16. The interface structure and mechanical properties of Ti/Al dissimilar metals friction stir lap welding
  17. Significance of micropores for the removal of hydrogen sulfide from oxygen-free gas streams by activated carbon
  18. Experimental and mechanistic studies of gradient pore polymer electrolyte fuel cells
  19. Microstructure and high-temperature oxidation behaviour of AISI 304L stainless steel welds produced by gas tungsten arc welding using the Ar–N2–H2 shielding gas
  20. Mathematical investigation of Fe3O4–Cu/blood hybrid nanofluid flow in stenotic arteries with magnetic and thermal interactions: Duality and stability analysis
  21. Topical Issue on Conference on Materials, Manufacturing Processes and Devices - Part II
  22. Effects of heat treatment on microstructure and properties of CrVNiAlCu high-entropy alloy
  23. Enhanced bioactivity and degradation behavior of zinc via micro-arc anodization for biomedical applications
  24. Study on the parameters optimization and the microstructure of spot welding joints of 304 stainless steel
  25. Research on rotating magnetic field–assisted HRFSW 6061-T6 thin plate
  26. Special Issue on A Deep Dive into Machining and Welding Advancements - Part II
  27. Microwave hybrid process-based fabrication of super duplex stainless steel joints using nickel and stainless steel filler materials
  28. Special Issue on Polymer and Composite Materials and Graphene and Novel Nanomaterials - Part II
  29. Low-temperature corrosion performance of laser cladded WB-Co coatings in acidic environment
  30. Special Issue for the conference AMEM2025
  31. Effect of thermal effect on lattice transformation and physical properties of white marble
Heruntergeladen am 21.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/htmp-2024-0039/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen