Home Surface plasmon resonance application in prostate cancer biomarker research
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Surface plasmon resonance application in prostate cancer biomarker research

  • Pavel Damborský , Narayanan Madaboosi , Virginia Chu , João P. Conde and Jaroslav Katrlík EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 28, 2014
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostics can be effectively addressed using sensor-based approaches. Proper selection of biomarkers to be included in biosensors for accurate detection becomes the need of the hour. Such biosensor and biochip technologies enable fast and efficient determination of proteins and provide a remarkable insight into the changes in the protein structure, such as aberrant glycosylation, which can increase the performance, sensitivity and specificity of clinic assays. However, for a thorough comprehension of such complex protein modifications, it is crucial to understand their biospecific interactions. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR), one of the most rapidly developing techniques for measuring real-time quantitative binding affinities and kinetics of the interactions of antigens and antibodies, was chosen as an appropriate tool for this purpose. Herein, experiments on the interactions of antibodies specific against different epitopes of free and complexed prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a prominent PCa biomarker, are presented with two main aims: (i) to continue as lectin glycoprofiling studies and; (ii) to be used in microfluidic immunoassay-based platforms for point-of-care devices. Various PSA-specific antibodies were covalently immobilized on the biochip surface via amine coupling, and free or complexed PSA was injected into the dual-flow channels of the SPR device. Kinetic parameters and affinity constants of these interactions, as well as cross-reactivities of the used antibodies were determined. The sandwich assay for PSA determination was developed employing both primary and secondary anti-PSA antibodies. Sensitivity of the assay was 3.63 nM−1, the detection limit was 0.27 nM and the SPR biosensor response towards free PSA was linear up to 25 nM. All these findings are essential for proper design of a selective, sensitive, and highly reliable biosensor for PCa diagnosis as a lab-on-chip device.

References

Black, M. H., Grass, C. L., Leinonen, J., Stenman, U. H., & Diamandis, E. P. (1999). Characterization of monoclonal antibodies for prostate-specific antigen and development of highly sensitive free prostate-specific antigen assays. Clinical Chemistry, 45, 347-354.10.1093/clinchem/45.3.347Search in Google Scholar

Cao, C., Kim, J. P., Kim, B. W., Chae, H., Yoon, H. C., Yang, S. S., & Sim, S. J. (2006). A strategy for sensitivity and specificity enhancements in prostate specific antigen-α1- antichymotrypsin detection based on surface plasmon resonance. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 21, 2106-2113. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2005.10.014.10.1016/j.bios.2005.10.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Fukushima, K., Satoh, T., Baba, S., & Yamashita, K. (2010). α1,2-Fucosylated and β-N-acetylgalactosaminylated prostate- specific antigen as an efficient marker of prostatic cancer.10.1093/glycob/cwp197Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Glycobiology, 20, 452-460. DOI: 10.1093/glycob/cwp197.10.1093/glycob/cwp197Search in Google Scholar

Gilgunn, S., Conroy, P. J., Saldova, R., Rudd, P. M., & O’Kennedy, R. J. (2013). Aberrant PSA glycosylation-a sweet predictor of prostate cancer. Nature Reviews Urology, 10, 99-107. DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2012.258.10.1038/nrurol.2012.258Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Goo, Y. A., & Goodlett, D. R. (2010). Advances in proteomic prostate cancer biomarker discovery. Journal of Proteomics, 73, 1839-1850. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.04.002.10.1016/j.jprot.2010.04.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Haseley, S. R., Talaga, P., Kamerling, J. P., Johannes, F. G., & Vliegenthart, J. F. G. (1999). Characterization of the carbohydrate binding specificity and kinetic parameters of lectins by using surface plasmon resonance. Analytical Biochemistry, 274, 203-210. DOI: 10.1006/abio.1999.4277.10.1006/abio.1999.4277Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Hu, W. H., Li, C. M., Cui, X. Q., Dong, H., & Zhou, Q. (2007). In situ studies of protein adsorptions on poly(pyrrole-copyrrole propylic acid) film by electrochemical surface plasmon resonance. Langmuir, 23, 2761-2767. DOI: 10.1021/ la063024d.10.1021/la063024dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Isono, T., Tanaka, T., Kageyama, S., & Yoshiki, T. (2002). Structural diversity of cancer-related and non-cancer-related prostate-specific antigen. Clinical Chemistry, 48, 2187-2194.10.1093/clinchem/48.12.2187Search in Google Scholar

Jeong, H. H., Erdene, N., Park, J. H., Jeong, D. H., Lee, H. Y., & Lee, S. K. (2013). Real-time label-free immunoassay of interferon-gamma and prostate-specific antigen using a fiber-optic localized surface plasmon resonance sensor. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 39, 346-351. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.08.013.10.1016/j.bios.2012.08.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Karlsson, R., Katsamba, P. S., Nordin, H., Pol, E., & Myszka, D. G. (2006). Analyzing a kinetic titration series using affinity biosensors. Analytical Biochemistry, 349, 136-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2005.09.034.10.1016/j.ab.2005.09.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Katrlik, J., Škrabana, R., Mislovičova, D., & Gemeiner, P. (2011). Binding of D-mannose-containing glycoproteins to D-mannose-specific lectins studied by surface plasmon resonance. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 382, 198-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011. 01.020.Search in Google Scholar

Katsamba, P. S., Navratilova, I., Calderon-Cacia, M., Fan, L., Thornton, K., Zhu, M., Bos, T. V., Forte, C., Friend, D., Laird-Offringa, I., Tavares, G., Whatley, J., Shi, E., Widom, A., Lindquist, K. C., Klakamp, S., Drake, A., Bohmann, D., Roell, M., Rose, L., Dorocke, J., Roth, B., Luginb¨uhl, B., & Myszka, D. G. (2006). Kinetic analysis of a highaffinity antibody/antigen interaction performed by multiple Biacore users. Analytical Biochemistry, 352, 208-221. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.01.034.10.1016/j.ab.2006.01.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Kuzmanov, U., Kosanam, H., & Diamandis, E. P. (2013). The sweet and sour of serological glycoprotein tumor biomarker quantification. BMC Medicine, 11, 31. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-31.10.1186/1741-7015-11-31Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Madu, C. O., & Lu, Y. (2010). Novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer. Journal of Cancer, 1, 150-177. DOI: 10.7150/jca.1.150.10.7150/jca.1.150Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Mani, V., Wasalathanthri, D. P., Joshi, A. A., Kumar, C. V., & Rusling, J. F. (2012). Highly efficient binding of paramagnetic beads bioconjugated with 100 000 or more antibodies to protein-coated surfaces. Analytical Chemistry, 84, 10485-10491. DOI: 10.1021/ac3028257.10.1021/ac3028257Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Nagasaki, H., Watanabe, M., Komatsu, N., Kaneko, T. Y., Dube, J., Kajita, T., Saitoh, Y., & Ohta, Y. (1999). Epitope analysis of a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) C-terminalspecific monoclonal antibody and new aspects for the discrepancy between equimolar and skewed PSA assays. Clinical Chemistry, 45, 486-496.10.1093/clinchem/45.4.486Search in Google Scholar

Prensner, J. R., Rubin,M. A., Wei, J. T., & Chinnaiyan, A.M. (2012). Beyond PSA: The next generation of prostate cancer biomarkers. Science Translational Medicine, 4, 127rv3. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003180.10.1126/scitranslmed.3003180Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Safina, G., Duran, I. B., Alasel, M., & Danielsson, B. (2011). Surface plasmon resonance for real-time study of lectin- carbohydrate interactions for the differentiation and identification of glycoproteins. Talanta, 84, 1284-1290. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2011.01.030.10.1016/j.talanta.2011.01.030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Stephan, C., Ralla, B., & Jung, K. (2014). Prostate-specific antigen and other serum and urine markers in prostate cancer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer, 1846, 99-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.04.001.10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.04.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Uludag, Y., & Tothill, I. E. (2012). Cancer biomarker detection in serum samples using surface plasmon resonance and quartz crystal microbalance sensors with nanoparticle signal amplification. Analytical Chemistry, 84, 5898-5904. DOI: 10.1021/ac300278p.10.1021/ac300278pSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Velonas, V. M., Woo, H. H., dos Remedios, C. G., & Assinder, S. J. (2013). Current status of biomarkers for prostate cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 14, 11034-11060. DOI: 10.3390/ijms140611034.10.3390/ijms140611034Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2014-4-5
Revised: 2014-8-5
Accepted: 2014-8-25
Published Online: 2014-11-28
Published in Print: 2015-1-1

© 2015 Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Biosensors – Topical issue
  2. Biosensors containing acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase as recognition tools for detection of various compounds
  3. Electrochemical enzymatic biosensors based on metal micro-/nanoparticles-modified electrodes: a review
  4. Gluconobacter sp. cells for manufacturing of effective electrochemical biosensors and biofuel cells
  5. Application of nanomaterials in microbial-cell biosensor constructions
  6. Use of green fluorescent proteins for in vitro biosensing
  7. Biosensors based on molecular beacons
  8. DNA aptamer-based detection of prostate cancer
  9. Can glycoprofiling be helpful in detecting prostate cancer?
  10. Graphene as signal amplifier for preparation of ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensors
  11. Electrochemical nanostructured biosensors: carbon nanotubes versus conductive and semi-conductive nanoparticles
  12. Surface plasmon resonance application in prostate cancer biomarker research
  13. Improvement of enzyme carbon paste-based biosensor using carbon nanotubes for determination of water-soluble analogue of vitamin E
  14. Enzymatic sensor of putrescine with optical oxygen transducer – mathematical model of responses of sensitive layer
  15. Detection of hydrogen peroxide and glucose by enzyme product precipitation on sensor surface
  16. Interfacing of microbial cells with nanoparticles: Simple and cost-effective preparation of a highly sensitive microbial ethanol biosensor
  17. Whole-cell optical biosensor for mercury – operational conditions in saline water
  18. Synthesis of carbon quantum dots for DNA labeling and its electrochemical, fluorescent and electrophoretic characterization
  19. Detection of short oligonucleotide sequences of hepatitis B virus using electrochemical DNA hybridisation biosensor
  20. Aptamer-based detection of thrombin by acoustic method using DNA tetrahedrons as immobilisation platform
  21. Interactions of antifouling monolayers: Energy transfer from excited albumin molecule to phenol red dye
  22. Third-generation oxygen amperometric biosensor based on Trametes hirsuta laccase covalently bound to graphite electrode
  23. Can voltammetry distinguish glycan isomers?
Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/chempap-2015-0053/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOooLkJa4xQ2IKVt5gwLILLWff4N-BLJBfEcKuGkfjg82kIPjT6rn
Scroll to top button