Home Effects of pH on antioxidant and prooxidant properties of common medicinal herbs
Article Open Access

Effects of pH on antioxidant and prooxidant properties of common medicinal herbs

  • Maria M. Bayliak EMAIL logo , Nadia I. Burdyliuk and Volodymyr I. Lushchak
Published/Copyright: November 6, 2016

Abstract

Background: We studied in vitro and vivo antioxidant and prooxidant abilities of aqueous extracts from Rosa canina L., Rhodiola rosea L., Hypericum perforatum L., and Gentiana lutea L. Methodology: Total antioxidant capacity was measured by four assays (phosphomolybdate method, Fe3+-reducing activity, ABTS•+ scavenging, H2O2 scavenging). Prooxidant activity was estimated by H2O2 production. Yeast viability in the presence of H2O2 and/or plant extracts was determined by plating or by counting live cells’ number. Results: Plant extracts differed in the total phenolic content (R. canina > R. rosea > H. perforatum > G. lutea) which clearly correlated with their ABTS•+ scavenging activity (R2 = 0.963). H2O2 scavenging activity was not clearly associated with plant phenol levels and was significantly higher in acidic, than in alkaline medium. In line with this, plant extracts effectively protected yeast S. cereviasiae against H2O2 and stimulated reproductive ability of yeast cells at acidic but not at alkaline pH. At alkaline pH, plant extracts produced certain amounts of H2O2 which were related to their phenolic content. Conclusion: The antioxidant activity of plant extracts is decreased at alkaline pH with an increase in the prooxidant activity. It reduces protective capacity of plant extracts against oxidative and other stresses in vivo.

1 Introduction

It has been postulated that oxidative stress resulting from an imbalance between production and elimination of reactive oxygen species (ROS) plays a pivotal role in aging and the development of many diseases such as cancer, immune-system decline, inflammation, cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disorders [1, 2]. Consumption of foods rich in antioxidants was found to prevent ROS-induced oxidative damages. Protective effects have been demonstrated for well-known plant-derived antioxidants such as vitamins C and E, carotenoids, as well as various phenolic compounds [3-6]. Due to the chemical diversity of antioxidant substances and the complexity of their composition in plants, total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of plant extracts is often measured as an integrated index [7, 8]. In many studies, positive correlations between the antioxidant capacity of plant extracts and their phenolic content were observed [9-11]. However, the content of phenolic compounds does not always correlate with total antioxidant activity of plant extracts [8].

There are a number of reports suggesting that plant phenols exhibit prooxidant and cytotoxic properties under certain conditions [3, 12]. The prooxidant activity of phytophenols is manifested under conditions that favor their autooxidation, for example, the presence of oxygen or transition metal ions, and alkaline pH [3,7,13,14]. Many plant phenols are rather unstable in aqueous liquid extracts where they are rapidly autooxidized [3, 15]. The ability of phenols to autooxidize should be taken into account when studying their metabolism and bioavailability in gastrointestinal tract, since pH in small intestine varies from neutral to alkaline. Low ROS levels produced through oxidation of phenols may be beneficial, since, by imposing a mild oxidative stress, the capacity of antioxidant defense and the activity of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes might be raised [14], leading to overall cytoprotection in the gastrointestinal tract [3]. However, the highly reactive ROS production by phenolic compounds may be dangerous due to the possible oxidative damage to intestinal mucosa, and it may be one of mechanisms explaining toxicity of high doses of phenolic compounds. Along with that, strong prooxidant properties of plant phenols may be considered as an additional mechanism of their antimicrobial action against concomitant pathogenic microorganisms in the intestine [16].

Antioxidant activity has been shown for many medicinal plants, and in vitro screening of new plant species as a first step has been carried out in the search for sources of new antioxidants [10, 17, 18]. As a second step, in vivo assays are also necessary to have a more precise evaluation of plant extracts as potential antioxidant agents. Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a widely used model in studies of stress responses in eukaryotic cells [19, 20], is a convenient organism for in vivo screening for natural antioxidants [17, 21, 22]. In this study, we used S. cerevisiae to assess antioxidant and prooxidant properties of four medicinal plants growing in Ukrainian Carpathian Mountains, Rhodiola rosea L., Gentiana lutea L., Rosa canina L., and Hyperycum perforatum L., which are also distributed in other temperate areas of Europe. A number of studies have reported on antioxidant activities of R. rosea [23-26], R. canina [9, 27-29], H. perforatum [11, 30, 31], and G. lutea [18, 32, 33]. However, little attention has paid to prooxidant properties of these plants, and the findings are focused mainly on reduction of antioxidant activity of plant extracts with increasing their doses [9]. Here, we tested the effects of pH on in vitro H2O2 scavenging and H202 producing activities of the extracts prepared from the above plants. We asked the question if these properties could modulate the ability of plant extracts to protect S. cerevisiae cells against oxidative stress in vivo. In addition, relationships between the plant phenolic content and the antioxidant and prooxidant activities were assessed.

2 Materials and Methods

2.1 Chemicals

Ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA), 2,2’-azinobis(3- ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS), 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethychroman-2- carboxylic acid (Trolox), xylenol orange, sorbitol, ferrous sulfate, peptone, and yeast extract were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (USA); quercetin was from Reanal (Budapest, Hungary). All other reagents were from local suppliers (Biochimpharma, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine) and they were of analytical grade of higher purity.

2.2 Preparation of plant aqueous extracts

The dried R. rosea and G. lutea rhizomes, R. canina fruit hips, and H. perforatum herb, collected in Ukrainian Carpathians, were used in the work. R. rosea and G. lutea rhizomes were obtained from Fitoapteka “Physalis” (Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine), R. canina fruit hips and H. perforatum herb were from PJSC Pharmaceutical Factory “Viola” (Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine). The herbal raw materials were homogenized to obtain particle fraction of 1-2 mm in size. The aqueous extraction was performed on the boiling water-bath in the ratio of 1:20 (w/v) (herbal dried homogenized material: distilled water) for 30 min. Liquid extracts were filtered, sterilized by boiling for 20 min, and kept at 4°C for no more than 24 hours.

2.3 Determination of total phenols and flavonoids

2.3.1 Total phenols

The total phenolic content in plant extracts was determined by the Folin-Ciocalteu method [34]. Briefly, 5 μ of plant extract sample was mixed with 0.2 ml of distilled water and 1 ml of diluted Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (1:10) (v/v). After 8 min incubation at room temperature, 0.8 ml of 7.5% sodium carbonate solution was added. The samples were then incubated at 45°C for 15 min and the absorbance was measured using spectrophotometer Spekol 211 (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) at 765 nm. Calibration curve was constructed using gallic acid standards (5-50 μg/ml). The total phenol content was expressed as micrograms of gallic acid equivalents per milliliter of plant extract μg GAE/ml).

2.3.2 Flavonoids

Flavonoid content was measured by aluminum chloride colorimetric assay [35]. To 50 μl of plant extract, 950 μl distilled water and 60 μl of 5% NaNO2 were added; 60 μl of 10% AlCl3 were added 5 min later. After 6 min incubation, 400 μl of 1 M NaOH were added and the total volume was adjusted to 2 ml with distilled water and the absorbance was measured after 15 min of reaction at 510 nm. Standard solutions of quercetin in a range from 2.5 to 50 μg/ml were used to build a calibration curve. The results were expressed as micrograms of quercetin equivalents per milliliter of plant aqueous extract μg QE/ml).

2.4 In vitro antioxidant activity of plant aqueous extracts

2.4.1 Total antioxidant capacity by phosphomolybdate method

The total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of plant extracts was evaluated by the phosphomolybdate method [36]. Briefly, 5 μl of plant extracts were mixed with 2 ml of reagent solution (0.6 M sulfuric acid, 28 mM potassium phosphate and 4 mM ammonium molybdate). The tubes containing reaction mixtures were incubated at 95°C for 90 min. Absorbance of the mixtures was then measured at 695 nm after cooling to room temperature. A calibration curve was built with ascorbic acid as a standard in a range from 5 to 60 μg/ml and the results were expressed as milligrams of ascorbic acid equivalents per milliliter of plant extract (mg AAE/ ml).

2.4.2 Reducing power ability

The ability of plant aqueous extracts to reduce ferric ions was determined by the formation of Perl’s Prussian blue [35]. For this, 5 μl of plant extracts were mixed with 0.5 ml of 200 mM potassium phosphate buffer (KPi, pH 6.6) and 0.5 ml of 1% aqueous potassium hexacyanoferrate [K3Fe(CN)6] followed by incubation at 50°C in water bath for 30 min. After incubation, 0.5 ml of 10% trichloracetic acid was added to stop the reaction. The upper portion of the solution (0.5 ml) was mixed with 1 ml distilled water, and 0.1 ml of 0.01% FeCl3 solution was added. The reaction mixture was left for 10 min at room temperature and the absorbance was measured at 700 nm. Solutions containing 5-200 μg/ml ascorbic acid were used as standards, and the results were expressed as milligrams of ascorbic acid equivalents per milliliter of plant extract (mg AAE/ml).

2.4.3 ABTS•+ scavenging activity

The ability of plant extracts to scavenge ABTS•+ radical cation was compared to Trolox standard [37, 38]. The ABTS•+ radical cation was pre-generated by dissolving 11 mg ABTS in 2 ml of solution of 2 mM H2O2 in 30 mM acetate buffer (pH 3.6) to final ABTS concentration of 10 mM and incubating for 1 h in dark at room temperature until characteristic color of ABTS•+ appeared. The incubation samples were prepared by mixing 150 μl of 0.4 M acetate buffer solution (pH 5.8), 15 μl of 10 mM ABTS•+ solution and 10 μl of plant extract. The rate at which absorbance of ABTS•+ cation radical at 414 nm dropped in the presence of plant extracts was monitored using Multiskan MCC/340 (Labsystem, Helsinki, Finland). Solutions of Trolox within a content range from 0.4 to 4 μg/ml were used as standards to build a calibration curve. The results were expressed as micrograms of Trolox equivalents per milliliter of plant extract μg Trolox/ml).

2.5 H2O2 scavenging and H2O2 producing activities of plant extracts

For determination of H2O2-scavenging activity, mixture containing 10 mM H2O2, 50 mM KPi, pH 6.0 or 7.8, and 100 μl of plant extract in a final volume of 2 ml was incubated for 30 min at room temperature. As a control, 10 mM H2O2 in 50 mM KPi (without plant extracts) was incubated under the same conditions. After incubation, the samples were 100-fold diluted and 200 μl of the samples were mixed with 1.8 ml of FOX reagent (250 μM FeSO4, 25 mM H2SO4, 100 μM xylenol orange, and 100 mM sorbitol) according to previously described FOX (ferrous ion oxidation xylenol orange) method [39]. The reaction mixture was then incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance of the ferric-xylenol orange complex was measured at 580 nm. The percentage of hydrogen peroxide scavenged by plant aqueous extracts was calculated as follows: scavenging of H2O2 = [(A0 – AX)/A0]×100, where A0 was the absorbance of the control (without plant extract) and AX was the absorbance in the presence of respective plant extract.

For estimation of H2O2 generating activity, 100 μl of plant extracts were mixed only with 50 mM KPi, pH 6.0 or 7.8, in a final volume of 2 ml and incubated during 30 min at room temperature. After incubation, the concentration of H2O2 in samples was determined by FOX method as described above. Solutions of H2O2 of known concentrations (1-100 micromoles per ml) were used as standards.

2.6 Estimation of reproductive ability of yeast cells

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain YPH250 (wide type, MATa trp1-A1 his3-A200 lys2-801 leu2-A1 ade2-101 ura3- 52) was used in this study. Yeast cultures were grown in liquid medium YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, and 2% glucose) using an orbital shaker at 28°C and 175 rpm. The cells from experimental cultures were collected after 15 h growth by centrifugation (5 min, 3000 g), washed twice with sterile distilled water and resuspended in fresh medium (pH 6.0) containing 1% glucose [14] .The resulting cell suspensions were treated with respective plant extracts for 2 h at 28 °C. The plant liquid extracts were added to a concentration of 50 μl/ml of culture medium, and the control yeast suspension was incubated without plant extracts. Reproductive ability was evaluated as an ability of yeast cells to form colonies by plating in duplicate on solid YPD medium after proper dilution. Plates were incubated at 28°C for 72 h and the colony- forming unit (CFU) numbers were counted. Yeast colony growth was expressed as percentage of CFUs; calculated as the ratio between the CFU number in experimental cultures to the CFU number in respective control cultures after plating on YPD agar [20].

2.7 Yeast oxidative stress assay

Exponential-phase cells were harvested after cultivation for 15 h and resuspended in 50 mM KPi, pH 6.0 or 7.8. Then, the aliquots of experimental suspensions were exposed to 10 mM H2O2 in the absence or the presence of respective plant extracts (50 μl/ml) followed by their incubation at 28°C for 30 min. Control samples were incubated under the same conditions but without H2O2. Cell survival after stress exposure was monitored by counting dead cells stained by methylene blue [40]. Tolerance was expressed as percentages of survival relative to control viability.

2.8 Statistical analysis

Experimental data are expressed as the mean value of 4-6 independent experiments ± the standard error of the mean (SEM). Comparison between means was performed in MYNOVA program using a two-tailed Student’s t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the two-tailed Dunnett’s test or Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) test.

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 Total antioxidant capacity of plant extracts depends on phenol levels

At the first stage, we examined the antioxidant capacity of prepared plant extracts by three widely used methods, namely phosphomolybdate method, reducing power and ABTS•+ scavenging assays. The plant extracts differed in their TAC measured by phosphomolybdate method with using ascorbic acid as a standard (Fig. 1A). The R. rosea aqueous extract had the highest TAC which amounted to 3.66 ± 0.24 mg AAE/ml. It was -1.8-, 4.3- and 2.8-fold higher than values for R. canina, H. perforatum, and G. lutea extracts, respectively (Fig. 1A). The ferric ion reducing ability of plant extract is demonstrated in Fig. 1B. In this assay, the reducing agents (i.e. antioxidants) reduce the Fe3+/ferricyanide complex to the ferrous form (Fe2+). As in the case of phosphomolybdate method, the highest reducing ability was observed for R. rosea extract (2.84 ± 0.26 mg AAE/ml). In general, reducing ability of R. rosea extract was 1.9-, 2.4- and 13.8-fold higher than ones for R. canina, H. perforatum and G. lutea extracts, respectively. Unlike TAC measured by phosphomolybdate and reducing ability assays, the highest ability to scavenge ABTS•+ radical was observed for R. canina extract and it was equivalent to 1328 ± 83 μg Trolox/ml (Fig. 1C). R. rosea extract had 20% lower ABTS•+ scavenging activity, than R. canina extract. The lowest ability to reduce ABTS•+ was shown for G. lutea extract which has 86% lower ABTS•+ scavenging activity than R. canina extract.

In total, the results of three methods used for determination of total antioxidant capacity shows that the aqueous extracts from R. rosea and R. canina are powerful scavengers of free radicals and reductants of oxidized molecules. H. perforatum extract takes an intermediate place, and G. lutea extract possesses the lowest antioxidant capacity. Our results are in agreement with other studies that have demonstrated a high antioxidant potential for extracts of R. rosea [23-26], R. canina [9, 27-29] and H. perforatum [11, 30, 31]. Extracts from G. lutea rhizomes were shown to have no such powerful antiradical activity in vitro as plants rich in polyphenols [18, 32] which is consistent with our results.

To elucidate the contribution of phenolic compounds to antioxidant properties of the plant extracts, we measured levels of total phenols and flavonoids, one of the most abundant groups of plant phenols. The R. canina extract contained the highest content of phenols (1437 ± 172 μg GAE/ml) while the extract from G. lutea rhizomes had the lowest (231 ± 31 μg GAE/ml) among the studied extracts (Fig. 2A). The R. rosea and H. perforatum extracts possessed 20% and 47% lower content of phenols, respectively, than R. canina extract. R. canina hips is known to contain large amounts of ascorbic acid which can interfere with phenols in the Folin-Ciocalteu assay [29]. Measurement of ascorbic acid content found only trace amounts of ascorbic acid in the prepared plant extracts (data not shown). It was expected, because ascorbic acid is heat sensitive and seems to be rapidly destroyed under extraction procedure with boiling water-bath.

Figure 1 Total antioxidant capacity of aqueous extracts from four Ukrainian medicinal herbs. (A) TAC measured by phosphomolybdate method; (B) reducing power measured as the ability to reduce ferric ions with formation of Perl’s Prussian blue; (C) ABTS•+ scavenging activity. aSignificantly different from values of R. rosea extract, bfrom values of R. canina extract, cfrom values of H. perforatum extract, and dfrom values of G. lutea extract with P < 0.05 as determined by ANOVA and the post-hoc Student-Newman-Keuls test. Data are means ± SEM, n = 5-6.
Figure 1

Total antioxidant capacity of aqueous extracts from four Ukrainian medicinal herbs. (A) TAC measured by phosphomolybdate method; (B) reducing power measured as the ability to reduce ferric ions with formation of Perl’s Prussian blue; (C) ABTS•+ scavenging activity. aSignificantly different from values of R. rosea extract, bfrom values of R. canina extract, cfrom values of H. perforatum extract, and dfrom values of G. lutea extract with P < 0.05 as determined by ANOVA and the post-hoc Student-Newman-Keuls test. Data are means ± SEM, n = 5-6.

Figure 2 The concentrations of total phenols (A) and total flavonoids (B) in aqueous extracts from four Ukrainian medicinal herbs. Significantly different from values of R. rosea extract, bfrom values of R. canina extract, cfrom values of H. perforatum extract, and dfrom values of G. lutea extract with P < 0.05 as determined by ANOVA and the post-hoc Student-Newman-Keuls test. Data are means ± SEM, n = 6.
Figure 2

The concentrations of total phenols (A) and total flavonoids (B) in aqueous extracts from four Ukrainian medicinal herbs. Significantly different from values of R. rosea extract, bfrom values of R. canina extract, cfrom values of H. perforatum extract, and dfrom values of G. lutea extract with P < 0.05 as determined by ANOVA and the post-hoc Student-Newman-Keuls test. Data are means ± SEM, n = 6.

As in the case of total phenols, R. canina and G. lutea extracts had the highest and the lowest flavonoid contents, respectively (957 ± 71 versus 148 ± 4 μg QE/ml), and moderate flavonoid levels were determined in R. rosea and H. perforatum extracts (Fig. 2B). A strong positive correlation revealed between total phenols and total flavonoids (R2 = 0.852, P < 0.05) suggests, that flavonoids are the important group of polyphenols in the plant species studied. Our results are in good agreement with levels of phenolic compounds measured previously in R. canina [9, 28, 29], R. rosea [25], and H. perforatum [11, 31]. At the same time, terpenoids, but not phenolic compounds, are key constituents of G. lutea rhizomes [32, 33, 41].

The clear correlations between phenolic content and TAC measured by phosphomolybdate or reducing power assays were not found. However, the total antioxidant capacity measured by ABTS•+ scavenging assay correlated strongly with total phenolic content (R2 = 0.963, P < 0.025) and flavonoid content (R2 = 0.852, P < 0.05) in the plant extracts. This suggests that free radical scavenging activity of the tested plant extracts may be attributed mainly to their phenolic compounds. Furthermore, ABTS•+ scavenging assay may be more informative that other used here in the context of reliable assessment antioxidant activity of plants rich in phenolics.

3.2 Alkaline pH decreases in vitro H2O2 scavenging activity with increasing H2O2 producing activity of plant extracts

The using an acidic incubation medium to determine TAC of plant extracts is a distinctive feature of all used above methods. At the same time, plant extracts are able to produce ROS as a result of autooxidation at pH higher than 7 [3,6,13-15]. It can be assumed that this prooxidant ability can modulate the antioxidant capacity of plant extracts. Determination of H2O2 concentration seems to be useful for assessment of plant prooxidant/oxidant properties, since the H2O2 can be measured after the incubation of the plant extracts alone or with H2O2 in the medium at different pH [35]. Therefore, we compared H2O2 scavenging and H2O2 producing activity of the plant extracts under acidic and alkaline pH (Fig. 3). For assay of H2O2 scavenging activity, fresh plant extracts were mixed with 50 mM KPi, pH 6.0 or 7.8, at the ratio 1:20 (v/v) and incubated for 30 min in the presence of 10 mM H2O2. All studied plant extracts showed the ability to scavenge H2O2 at pH 6.0 and 7.8, but the percentage of H2O2 inhibition was higher in the incubation medium with acidic pH (Fig. 3A). Among plant extracts, R. rosea extract was the most effective H2O2-scavenger with H2O2 decomposition percentage of 89 ± 3 versus 63 ± 4 at pH 6.0 and 7.8, respectively. H2O2 scavenging activity of other plant extracts was in range from 38 to 55% at pH 6.0 and from 30 to 36% at pH 7.8. Hence, plant aqueous extracts are able to scavenge H2O2 more effectively at acidic pH, than at alkaline one. The effectiveness of H2O2 scavenging at pH 6.0 was 1.4-fold higher for R. rosea and G. lutea extracts and 1.2-fold higher for R. canina and H. perforatum extracts. For R. canina, H. perforatum and G. lutea extracts, H2O2 scavenging activity correlated with their phenolic content (R2 = 0.973, at pH 6.0), but it was not observed for R. rosea extract. It suggests that other phytochemicals than phenols could be also responsible for H2O2-detoxificating ability of plant extracts. Decreased H2O2 scavenging at pH 7.8 could be connected with the instability of many phenolic compounds at alkaline pH [15] due to which their antioxidant activity might be decreased.

Figure 3 H2O2 scavenging (A) and H2O2 producing (B) activities of plant extracts (50 μl/ml) at different pHs. H2O2 scavenging activity was expressed as percentages of scavenged H2O2 and H2O2 producing activity (in log scale) was expressed as micromoles of H2O2 produced by plant extract in 1 ml of medium for 30 min. *Significantly different from respective values at pH 6.0 with P < 0.05 using Student’s t-test. Data are means ± SEM, n = 5-6.
Figure 3

H2O2 scavenging (A) and H2O2 producing (B) activities of plant extracts (50 μl/ml) at different pHs. H2O2 scavenging activity was expressed as percentages of scavenged H2O2 and H2O2 producing activity (in log scale) was expressed as micromoles of H2O2 produced by plant extract in 1 ml of medium for 30 min. *Significantly different from respective values at pH 6.0 with P < 0.05 using Student’s t-test. Data are means ± SEM, n = 5-6.

Certain levels of ROS, such as superoxide anion radical and hydrogen peroxide, can be produced as a result of autooxidation of plant extracts [3, 14]. In order to check this for our plant extracts, we detected H2O2 production by the extracts in 50 mM KPi at pH 6.0 and 7.8. Fig. 3B demonstrates the limited ability to generate H2O2 at acidic pH for extracts of R. canina, H. perforatum and G. lutea: the amounts of H2O2 produced per 1 ml of medium by 50 μl of these extracts did not exceed 1 μmole. Larger amounts of H2O2 were produced by 50 μl of R. rosea extract (6.8 ± 1.4 μmoles H2O2 /ml). Interestingly, the production of H2O2 was significantly higher in 50 mM KPi with pH 7.8: the increase was ~ 25-, 21-, 8- and 6-fold for R. rosea, R. canina, H. perforatum and G. lutea extracts, respectively (Fig. 3B). It seems that deprotonation of phenols provides higher capability to enter autoxidation: the acid dissociation of the phenolic group has a stronger electrondonating property than the undissociated one [15]. No clear linear correlation between total phenolic content and H2O2 producing activity of plant extracts was observed (R2 = 0.175, at pH 7.8). However, plant extracts with higher phenolic contents, namely R. rosea and R. canina extracts, produced more H2O2 than extracts of H. perforatum and G. lutea, which have lower total phenolic content. High prooxidant ability of plant extracts at alkaline pH could explain their lower H2O2 scavenging activity in similar environment.

3.3 Plant extracts protect yeast cells against H2O2 at acidic but not at alkaline pH

As it was shown above, the tested plant aqueous extracts possess pH-dependent H2O2 scavenging and H2O2 producing activities. These facts directed us to explore the antioxidant effectiveness of plant extracts in vivo depending on pH medium. To achieve this aim, yeast S. cerevisiae YPH250 cells were treated with 10 mM H2O2 in 50 mM KPi buffer, pH 6.0 or 7.8, and plant extracts at concentration of 50 μl/ml were immediately added. After 30-min period of treatment, the number of live cells in experimental cultures was counted. In control cultures (without plant extracts) treated with H2O2, number of viable cells was 67% lower at pH 6.0 and only 3.2 ± 1.2% of cells survived at pH 7.8 (Fig. 4). Yeast S. cerevisiae belongs to acidophilic organisms which grow better at acidic than at neutral or alkaline pHs [42]. Moreover, alkalinization of the medium represents a stress condition for the budding yeast [42, 43]. Therefore, we supposed that the combined action of two stressors, alkaline pH and hydrogen peroxide, could sensitize yeast cells to H2O2 leading to rapid cell death.

The incubation of yeast cells with H2O2 in the presence of plant extracts significantly alleviated toxic action of this oxidant at pH 6.0 (Fig. 4). Under combined treatment with H2O2 and plant extracts, viability of yeast cells was 2-2.7-fold higher than of control ones treated with H2O2 only. The R. canina extract demonstrated the highest protective effect with increasing yeast survival up to 90%. Previous reports demonstrated protective effects against H2O2 in cell cultures for extracts or isolated compounds from H. perforatum [44] and R. rosea [21, 45]. At the same time, the plant extracts tested did not significantly affect yeast survival under H2O2 exposure at pH 7.8. Thus, we concluded that the plant extracts were able to protect yeast cells against oxidative treatment at acidic pH but not at alkaline pH. These data are in good agreement with our results regarding pH-sensitivity of the antioxidant activity of plant extracts: plant extracts were better H2O2- scavengers at acidic, than at alkaline pH. Increase in pH medium led to increase in ROS-generating capacity of plant extracts. Since sensitivity to H2O2 in yeast cells was increased at alkaline pH, the interfering of antioxidant activity with prooxidant activity did not allow the plant extracts to act as stress-protectants under such conditions. In addition, no relationship between yeast stress survival and H2O2-scavenging activity of the plant extracts was observed. At the same time, viability of yeast cells treated with H2O2 in acidic pH in the presence of plant extracts positively correlated with total phenolic content (R2 = 0.656) and ABTS•+ scavenging activity of these extracts (R2 = 0.772). These results suggest that protective effects of plant extracts against H2O2 exposure are determined to a great extent by antioxidant properties of the phenolic compounds. The antioxidant properties include not only H2O2 scavenging ability but also the ability to scavenge other ROS which can be formed as a result of metabolism of H2O2 inside the cells.

Figure 4 Viability of S. cerevisiae YPH250 cells treated with 10 mM H2O2 for 30 min in the presence of 50 μl/ml of plant extracts. *Significantly different from respective control values (without plant extracts) at pH 6.0 with P < 0.05 using Dunnett’s test. Data are means ± SEM, n = 5.
Figure 4

Viability of S. cerevisiae YPH250 cells treated with 10 mM H2O2 for 30 min in the presence of 50 μl/ml of plant extracts. *Significantly different from respective control values (without plant extracts) at pH 6.0 with P < 0.05 using Dunnett’s test. Data are means ± SEM, n = 5.

3.4 Plant extracts stimulate yeast reproductive ability at acidic pH

S. cerevisiae cells are able to grow at relatively broad range of external pH values, but proliferate better at acidic than at neutral or alkaline pH, and in fact, their growth is stopped in a medium with pH 8.2 [42]. Furthermore, it was shown that H2O2 at very low concentrations could stimulate reproduction of yeast cells [20, 38] and other fungi [46]. Taking into consideration these facts and the showed above H2O2 producing ability of the plant extracts at alkaline pH, we addressed the question if plant extracts were able to affect yeast growth in the culture medium with different pHs. The reproductive capability was estimated by an ability of yeast cells to form colonies on agar YPD plates. The results are presented in Fig. 5. The number of colonies formed in control yeast cultures (without plant extracts) was similar upon incubation for 2 h at different pH levels, namely 6.0, 7.0 and 7.8, and it was set to be 100%. The supplementation of the medium with R. canina extract did not influence cell reproduction at all pH used. Along with that, the extracts from other plants used (50 μl/ml) stimulated the colony yeast formation by 25-42% in acidic medium (pH 6.0) and had no effects on yeast colony growth at neutral and alkaline pH. Thus, H2O2 producing ability of plant extracts at alkaline pH did not improve yeast growth under these conditions. It is consistent with previous data that S. ceresiviae cell differentiation programs and proliferation are under tight control of alkalinization of the medium [43]. Our results suggest that certain phytochemicals present in plant extracts are able to stimulate yeast reproduction at acidic pH. The ability of different herb extracts to activate cell proliferation was demonstrated earlier. Usually, the stimulation effects were observed at low doses of plant preparations with inhibitory effects at higher ones [47, 48]. For example, it has been reported that hyperforin from H. perforatum can induce keratinocyte differentiation in vitro [49]. Stimulation of proliferation was found to be beneficial for normal cells or tissues which require rejuvenation and regeneration and it is undesirable for cancer cells due to promoting cancer malignization [48, 50]. In yeast, stimulation of the reproductive potential seems to be an effective approach to increase biomass and to improve yeast survival under different stresses [38].

Figure 5 The effects of 2-h treatment with plant extracts (50 μl/ml) on colony-forming ability of S. cerevisiae YPH250 at different pHs. Colony-forming ability was assessed as the ability of one cell to form a colony (a colony-forming unit, CFU) after plating on YPD agar. The numbers of CFUs in control cultures (without plant extracts) were set to 100%. ‘Significantly different from respective control values (without plant extracts) with P < 0.05 using Dunnett’s test. Data are means ± SEM, n = 4-5.
Figure 5

The effects of 2-h treatment with plant extracts (50 μl/ml) on colony-forming ability of S. cerevisiae YPH250 at different pHs. Colony-forming ability was assessed as the ability of one cell to form a colony (a colony-forming unit, CFU) after plating on YPD agar. The numbers of CFUs in control cultures (without plant extracts) were set to 100%. ‘Significantly different from respective control values (without plant extracts) with P < 0.05 using Dunnett’s test. Data are means ± SEM, n = 4-5.

The data taken together suggest that beneficial effects of plant aqueous extracts on living organisms with physiological pH range close to neutral can result from their combined antioxidant and prooxidant activities. Mild prooxidant activity can be beneficial as a pre-adaptation mechanism, since it can stimulate endogenous defense system leading to overall cytoprotection and cross-adaptation to followed stresses [3,14,20,38]. Prooxidant activity of plant extracts is also considered as one of the mechanisms of anticancer effects of many phytochemicals [12]. However, overproduction of ROS by phytochemicals may also be dangerous due to possible oxidative damages of intestinal mucosa in animals. In addition, phenolic compounds are metabolized as “typical xenobiotics” by the human body, and such metabolism can influence their antioxidant and prooxidant abilities [3] that can result in oxidative stress of different intensity with respective consequences [1].

4 Conclusions

The results obtained in this study clearly show that: (i) in vitro and in vivo phenolic compounds in plant extracts may demonstrate both antioxidant and prooxidant properties; (ii) prooxidant activity is increased, while antioxidant activity of plant extracts is inhibited in alkaline medium; (iii) plant extracts may act as effective antioxidants and stimulators of cell growth in yeast S. cereviase at acidic pH but not at alkaline one; (iv) budding yeast S. cerevisiae can be used as a model organism to elucidate mechanisms of protective effects of phytochemicals which can be transferred further with certain precautions to higher eukaryotes.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Yoshiharu Inoue (Kyoto University, Japan) for the providing S. cerevisiae strain, our students L.I. Izers’ka and Kh.I. Hryshuk for technical assistance, and Ms. U. Dzaman for English editing of the manuscript.

  1. Conflict of interest: The authors declare nothing to disclose.

Abbreviations

AAE

ascorbic acid equivalent

CFU

colony-forming unit

GAE

gallic acid equivalent

KPi

potassium phosphate buffer

QE

quercetin equivalent

ROS

reactive oxygen species

TAC

total antioxidant capacity

YPD medium

yeast extract peptone dextrose (glucose) medium.

References

[1] Lushchak V.I., Free radicals, reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress and its classification, Chem. Biol. Interact., 2014, 224C, 164-17510.1016/j.cbi.2014.10.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Sies H., Oxidative stress: a concept in redox biology and medicine, Redox Biol., 2015, 4, 180-18310.1016/j.redox.2015.01.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[3] Halliwell B., Are polyphenols antioxidants or pro-oxidants? What do we learn from cell culture and in vivo studies? Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 2008, 476 (2), 107-11210.1016/j.abb.2008.01.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Sies H., Polyphenols and health: update and perspectives, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 2010, 501 (1), 2-510.1016/j.abb.2010.04.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Landete J.M., Dietary intake of natural antioxidants: vitamins and polyphenols, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 2013, 53 (7), 706-72110.1080/10408398.2011.555018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Genaro-Mattos T.C., Maurício Â.Q., Rettori D., Alonso A., Hermes-Lima M., Correction: Antioxidant activity of caffeic acid against iron-induced free radical generation – a chemical approach. PLoS One, 2015, 10 (11), e0142402, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.014240210.1371/journal.pone.0142402Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[7] Dai J., Mumper R.J., Plant phenolics: extraction, analysis and their antioxidant and anticancer properties, Molecules, 2010, 15 (10), 7313-735210.3390/molecules15107313Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] Kulisic T., Radonic A., Katalinic V., Milos M., Use of different methods for testing antioxidative activity of oregano essential oil, Food Chem., (2004), 85, 633-64010.1016/j.foodchem.2003.07.024Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kilicgun H., Altiner, D., Correlation between antioxidant effect mechanisms and polyphenol content of Rosa canina, Pharmacogn. Mag., 2010, 6 (23), 238-24110.4103/0973-1296.66943Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Katalinic V., Milos M., Kulisic T., Lukic M., Screening of 70 medicinal plant extracts for antioxidant capacity and total phenols, Food Chem., 2006, 94, 550-55710.1016/j.foodchem.2004.12.004Search in Google Scholar

[11] Öztürk N., Tunçel M., Potoğlu-Erkara I., Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of some Hypericum species: A comparative study with H. perforatum, Pharm. Biol., 2009, 47 (2), 120-12710.1080/13880200802437073Search in Google Scholar

[12] Khan H.Y., Zubair H., Faisal M., Ullah M.F., Farhan M., Sarkar F.H., et al., Plant polyphenol induced cell death in human cancer cells involves mobilization of intracellular copper ions and reactive oxygen species generation: a mechanism for cancer chemopreventive action, Mol. Nutr. Food Res., 2014, 58 (3), 437-44610.1002/mnfr.201300417Search in Google Scholar

[13] Sakihama Y., Cohen M.F., Grace S.C., Yamasaki H., Plant phenolic antioxidant and prooxidant activities: phenolics- induced oxidative damage mediated by metals in plants, Toxicology, 2002, 177 (1), 67-8010.1016/S0300-483X(02)00196-8Search in Google Scholar

[14] Maeta K., Nomura W., Takatsume Y., Izawa S., Inoue Y., Green tea polyphenols function as prooxidants to activate oxidative- stress-responsive transcription factors in yeasts, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2007, 73, 572-58010.1128/AEM.01963-06Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[15] Akagawa M., Shigemitsu T., Suyama K., Production of hydrogen peroxide by polyphenols and polyphenol-rich beverages under quasi-physiological conditions, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 2003, 67 (12), 2632-264010.1271/bbb.67.2632Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Upadhyay A., Upadhyaya I., Kollanoor-Johny A., Venkitanarayanan K., Combating pathogenic microorganisms using plant-derived antimicrobials: a minireview of the mechanistic basis, Biomed. Res. Int., 2014, 761741, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/76174110.1155/2014/761741Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Silva C.G., Herdeiro R.S., Mathias C.J., Panek A.D., Silveira C.S., Rodrigues V.P., et al., Evaluation of antioxidant activity of Brazilian plants, Pharmacol. Res., 2005, 52 (3), 229-23310.1016/j.phrs.2005.03.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Kintzios S., Papageorgiou K., Yiakoumettis I., Baricevic D., Kusar A., Evaluation of the antioxidants activities of four Slovene medicinal plant species by traditional and novel biosensory assays, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 2010, 53 (3), 773-77610.1016/j.jpba.2010.05.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Lushchak V.I., Oxidative stress in yeast. Biochemistry (Moscow), 2010, 75, 281-29610.1134/S0006297910030041Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Semchyshyn H.M., Hormetic concentrations of hydrogen peroxide but not ethanol induce cross-adaptation to different stresses in budding yeast, Int. J. Microbiol., 2014, 485792, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/48579210.1155/2014/485792Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] Bayliak M.M., Burdyliuk N.I., Izers’ka L.I., Lushchak V.I., Concentration-dependent effects of Rhodiola rosea on long-term survival and stress resistance of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the involvement of Yap 1 and Msn2/4 regulatory proteins, Dose-Response, 2014, 11 (1), 93-10910.2203/dose-response.13-013.BayliakSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[22] Bayliak M.M., Burdylyuk, N.I., Lushchak V.I., Quercetin increases stress resistance in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae not only as an antioxidant, Ann. Microbiol., 2016, 66 (2), 569-57610.1007/s13213-015-1136-8Search in Google Scholar

[23] De Sanctis R., De Bellis R., Scesa C., Mancini U., Cucchiarini L., Dacha M., In vitro protective effect of Rhodiola rosea extract against hypochlorous acid-induced oxidative damage in human erythrocytes, Biofactors, 2004, 20 (3), 147-15910.1002/biof.5520200304Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Kim S.H., Hyun S.H., Choung S.Y., Antioxidative effects of Cinnamomi cassiae and Rhodiola rosea extracts in liver of diabetic mice, Biofactors, 2006, 26 (3), 209-21910.1002/biof.5520260306Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Chen T.S., Liou S.Y., Chang Y.L., Antioxidant evaluation of three adaptogen extracts, Am. J. Chin. Med., 2008, 36 (6), 1209-121710.1142/S0192415X08006533Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Zhou Q., Yin Z.P., Ma L., Zhao W., Hao H.W., Li H.L., Free radical- scavenging activities of oligomeric proanthocyanidin from Rhodiola rosea L. and its antioxidant effects in vivo, Nat. Prod. Res., 2014, 28(24), 2301-230310.1080/14786419.2014.921786Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Kirkeskov B., Christensen R., Bügel S., Bridal H., Danneskjold-Samsøe B., Christensen L.P., et al., The effects of rose hip (Rosa canina) on plasma antioxidative activity and C-reactive protein in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and normal controls: a prospective cohort study, Phytomedicine, 2011, 18 (11), 953-95810.1016/j.phymed.2011.02.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Widén C., Ekholm A., Coleman M.D., Renvert S., Rumpunen K., Erythrocyte antioxidant protection of rose hips (Rosa spp.), Oxid. Med. Cell Longev., 2012, 621579, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/62157910.1155/2012/621579Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[29] Roman I., Stanila A., Stanila S., Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of Rosa canina L. biotypes from spontaneous flora of Transylvania, Chem. Cent. J., 2013, 7 (1), 73, http://ccj.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/1752-153X-7-7310.1186/1752-153X-7-73Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[30] Zou Y., Lu Y., Wei D., Antioxidant activity of a flavonoid-rich extract of Hypericum perforatum L., J. Agric. Food Chem., 2004, 52 (16), 5032-503910.1021/jf049571rSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Silva B.A., Malva J.O. Dias A.C., St. John’s Wort (Hypericum perforatum) extracts and isolated phenolic compounds are effective antioxidants in several in vitro models of oxidative stress, Food Chem., 2008, 110 (3), 611-61910.1016/j.foodchem.2008.02.047Search in Google Scholar

[32] Nastasijevic B., Lazarevic-Pasti T., Dimitrijevic-Brankovic S., Pasti I., Vujacic A., Joksic G., et al., Inhibition of myeloperoxidase and antioxidative activity of Gentiana lutea extracts, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 2012, 66, 191-19610.1016/j.jpba.2012.03.052Search in Google Scholar

[33] Azman N.A., Segovia F., Martínez-Farré X., Gil E., Almajano M.P., Screening of antioxidant activity of Gentian lutea root and its application in oil-in-water emulsions, Antioxidants, 2014, 3 (2), 455-47110.3390/antiox3020455Search in Google Scholar

[34] Singleton V.L., Orthofer R., Lamuela-Ravento’s R.M., Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, Meth. Enzymol., 1999, 299,152-17810.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1Search in Google Scholar

[35] Nagavani V., Raghava Rao T., Evaluation of antioxidant potential and identification of polyphenols by RP-HPLC in Michelia champaca flowers, Adv. Biol. Res., 2010, 4 (3), 159-168.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Prieto P., Pineda M., Aguilar M., Spectrometric quantitation of antioxidant capacity through the formation of a phosphomo- lybdenum complex: specific application to the determination of vitamin E, Anal. Biochem., 1999, 269, 337-341.10.1006/abio.1999.4019Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Erel O., A novel automated direct measurement method for total antioxidant capacity using a new generation, more stable ABTS radical cation, Clin. Biochem., 2004, 37 (4), 277-285.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2003.11.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Vasylkovska R., Petriv N., Semchyshyn H., Carbon sources for yeast growth as a precondition of hydrogen peroxide induced hormetic phenotype, Int. J. Microbiol., 2015, 697813, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/69781310.1155/2015/697813Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[39] Nourooz-Zadeh J., Tajaddini-Sarmadi J., Wolff S.P., Measurement of plasma hydroperoxide concentrations by the ferrous oxidation-xylenol orange assay in conjunction with triphenylphosphine, Anal. Biochem., 1994, 220, 403-40910.1006/abio.1994.1357Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[40] Smart K., Chambers K., Lambert I., Jenkins C., Smart C.A., Use of methylene violet staining procedures to determine yeast viability and vitality, J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem., 1999, 57, 18-2310.1094/ASBCJ-57-0018Search in Google Scholar

[41] Aberham A., Schwaiger S., Stuppner H., Ganzera M., Quantitative analysis of iridoids, secoiridoids, xanthones and xanthone glycosides in Gentiana lutea L. roots by RP-HPLC and LC-MS, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 2007, 45(3), 437-44210.1016/j.jpba.2007.07.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[42] Ariño J., Integrative responses to high pH stress in S. cerevisiae, OMICS, 2010, 14 (5), 517-523.10.1089/omi.2010.0044Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[43] Serra-Cardona A., Canadell D., Ariño J., Coordinate responses to alkaline pH stress in budding yeast, Microbial. Cell, 2015, 2 (6), 182-19610.15698/mic2015.06.205Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[44] Zou Y.P., Lu Y.H., Wei D.Z., Protective effects of a flavonoid-rich extract of Hypericum perforatum L. against hydrogen peroxide- induced apoptosis in PC12 cells, Phytother. Res. Suppl., 2010, 1, S6-S1010.1002/ptr.2852Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[45] Zhang L., Yu H., Sun Y., Lin X., Chen B., Tan C., et al., Protective effects of salidroside on hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 2007, 564 (1-3), 18-2510.1016/j.ejphar.2007.01.089Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[46] Haniu A.E., Maricato J.T., Mathias P.P., Castilho D.G., Miguel R.B., Monteiro H.P., et al., Low concentrations of hydrogen peroxide or nitrite induced of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis cell proliferation in a Ras-dependent manner, PLoS ONE, 2013, 8 (7), e69590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.006959010.1371/journal.pone.0069590Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[47] Zandonai R.H., Coelho F., Ferreira J., Mendes A.K.B.; Biavatti M.W.; Niero R., et al., Evaluation of the proliferative activity of methanol extracts from six medicinal plants in murine spleen cells, Braz. J. Pharm. Sci., 2010, 46 (2), 323-33310.1590/S1984-82502010000200020Search in Google Scholar

[48] Hasan N.M., Sorkhy M.K., Herbs that promote cell proliferation, Int. J. Herb. Med., 2014, 6, 18-21Search in Google Scholar

[49] Müller M., Essin K., Hill K., Beschmann H., Rubant S., Schempp C.M., et al., Specific TRPC6 channel activation, a novel approach to stimulate keratinocyte differentiation, J. Biol. Chem., 2008, 283 (49), 33942-3395410.1074/jbc.M801844200Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[50] Borriello A., Bencivenga D., Caldarelli I., Tramontano A., Borgia A., Pirozzi A.V., et al., Resveratrol and cancer treatment: is hormesis a yet unsolved matter? Curr. Pharm. Des., 2013, 19 (30), 5384-539310.2174/1381612811319300007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-5-4
Accepted: 2016-10-6
Published Online: 2016-11-6
Published in Print: 2016-1-1

© 2016 Maria M. Bayliak et al., published by De Gruyter Open

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular article
  2. Purification of polyclonal IgG specific for Camelid’s antibodies and their recombinant nanobodies
  3. Regular article
  4. Antioxidative defense mechanism of the ruderal Verbascum olympicum Boiss. against copper (Cu)-induced stress
  5. Regular article
  6. Polyherbal EMSA ERITIN Promotes Erythroid Lineages and Lymphocyte Migration in Irradiated Mice
  7. Regular article
  8. Expression and characterization of a cutinase (AnCUT2) from Aspergillus niger
  9. Regular article
  10. The Lytic SA Phage Demonstrate Bactericidal Activity against Mastitis Causing Staphylococcus aureus
  11. Regular article
  12. MafB, a target of microRNA-155, regulates dendritic cell maturation
  13. Regular article
  14. Plant regeneration from protoplasts of Gentiana straminea Maxim
  15. Regular article
  16. The effect of radiation of LED modules on the growth of dill (Anethum graveolens L.)
  17. Regular article
  18. ELF-EMF exposure decreases the peroxidase catalytic efficiency in vitro
  19. Regular article
  20. Cold hardening protects cereals from oxidative stress and necrotrophic fungal pathogenesis
  21. Regular article
  22. MC1R gene variants involvement in human OCA phenotype
  23. Regular article
  24. Chondrogenic potential of canine articular cartilage derived cells (cACCs)
  25. Regular article
  26. Cloning, expression, purification and characterization of Leishmania tropica PDI-2 protein
  27. Regular article
  28. High potential of sub-Mediterranean dry grasslands for sheep epizoochory
  29. Regular article
  30. Identification of drought, cadmium and root-lesion nematode infection stress-responsive transcription factors in ramie
  31. Regular article
  32. Herbal supplement formula of Elephantopus scaber and Sauropus androgynus promotes IL-2 cytokine production of CD4+T cells in pregnant mice with typhoid fever
  33. Regular article
  34. Caffeine effects on AdoR mRNA expression in Drosophila melanogaster
  35. Regular article
  36. Effects of MgCl2 supplementation on blood parameters and kidney injury of rats exposed to CCl4
  37. Regular article
  38. Effective onion leaf fleck management and variability of storage pathogens
  39. Regular article
  40. Improving aeration for efficient oxygenation in sea bass sea cages. Blood, brain and gill histology
  41. Regular article
  42. Biogenic amines and hygienic quality of lucerne silage
  43. Regular article
  44. Isolation and characterization of lytic phages TSE1-3 against Enterobacter cloacae
  45. Regular article
  46. Effects of pH on antioxidant and prooxidant properties of common medicinal herbs
  47. Regular article
  48. Relationship between cytokines and running economy in marathon runners
  49. Regular article
  50. Anti-leukemic activity of DNA methyltransferase inhibitor procaine targeted on human leukaemia cells
  51. Regular article
  52. Research Progress in Oncology. Highlighting and Exploiting the Roles of Several Strategic Proteins in Understanding Cancer Biology
  53. Regular article
  54. Ectomycorrhizal communities in a Tuber aestivum Vittad. orchard in Poland
  55. Regular article
  56. Impact of HLA-G 14 bp polymorphism and soluble HLA-G level on kidney graft outcome
  57. Regular article
  58. In-silico analysis of non-synonymous-SNPs of STEAP2: To provoke the progression of prostate cancer
  59. Regular article
  60. Presence of sequence and SNP variation in the IRF6 gene in healthy residents of Guangdong Province
  61. Regular article
  62. Environmental and economic aspects of Triticum aestivum L. and Avena sativa growing
  63. Regular article
  64. A molecular survey of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato in central-eastern Europe
  65. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  66. Molecular genetics related to non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  67. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  68. Roles of long noncoding RNAs in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  69. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  70. Advancement of Wnt signal pathway and the target of breast cancer
  71. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  72. A tumor suppressive role of lncRNA GAS5 in human colorectal cancer
  73. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  74. The role of E-cadherin - 160C/A polymorphism in breast cancer
  75. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  76. The proceedings of brain metastases from lung cancer
  77. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  78. Newly-presented potential targeted drugs in the treatment of renal cell cancer
  79. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  80. Decreased expression of miR-132 in CRC tissues and its inhibitory function on tumor progression
  81. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  82. The unusual yin-yang fashion of RIZ1/RIZ2 contributes to the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
  83. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  84. Human papillomavirus infection mechanism and vaccine of vulva carcinoma
  85. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  86. Abnormal expressed long non-coding RNA IRAIN inhibits tumor progression in human renal cell carcinoma cells
  87. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  88. UCA1, a long noncoding RNA, promotes the proliferation of CRC cells via p53/p21 signaling
  89. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  90. Forkhead box 1 expression is upregulatedin non-small cell lung cancer and correlateswith pathological parameters
  91. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  92. The development of potential targets in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer
  93. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  94. Low expression of miR-192 in NSCLC and its tumor suppressor functions in metastasis via targeting ZEB2
  95. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  96. Downregulation of long non-coding RNA MALAT1 induces tumor progression of human breast cancer through regulating CCND1 expression
  97. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  98. Post-translational modifications of EMT transcriptional factors in cancer metastasis
  99. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  100. EZH2 Expression and its Correlation with Clinicopathological Features in Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma
  101. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  102. The association between EGFR expression and clinical pathology characteristics in gastric cancer
  103. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  104. The peiminine stimulating autophagy in human colorectal carcinoma cells via AMPK pathway by SQSTM1
  105. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  106. Activating transcription factor 3 is downregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma and functions as a tumor suppressor by regulating cyclin D1
  107. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  108. Progress toward resistance mechanism to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor
  109. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  110. Effect of miRNAs in lung cancer suppression and oncogenesis
  111. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  112. Role and inhibition of Src signaling in the progression of liver cancer
  113. Topical Issue on Cancer Signaling, Metastasis and Target Therapy
  114. The antitumor effects of mitochondria-targeted 6-(nicotinamide) methyl coumarin
  115. Special Issue on CleanWAS 2015
  116. Characterization of particle shape, zeta potential, loading efficiency and outdoor stability for chitosan-ricinoleic acid loaded with rotenone
  117. Special Issue on CleanWAS 2015
  118. Genetic diversity and population structure of ginseng in China based on RAPD analysis
  119. Special Issue on CleanWAS 2015
  120. Optimizing the extraction of antibacterial compounds from pineapple leaf fiber
  121. Special Issue on CleanWAS 2015
  122. Identification of residual non-biodegradable organic compounds in wastewater effluent after two-stage biochemical treatment
  123. Special Issue on CleanWAS 2015
  124. Remediation of deltamethrin contaminated cotton fields: residual and adsorption assessment
  125. Special Issue on CleanWAS 2015
  126. A best-fit probability distribution for the estimation of rainfall in northern regions of Pakistan
  127. Special Issue on CleanWAS 2015
  128. Artificial Plant Root System Growth for Distributed Optimization: Models and Emergent Behaviors
  129. Special Issue on CleanWAS 2015
  130. The complete mitochondrial genomes of two weevils, Eucryptorrhynchus chinensis and E. brandti: conserved genome arrangement in Curculionidae and deficiency of tRNA-Ile gene
  131. Special Issue on CleanWAS 2015
  132. Characteristics and coordination of source-sink relationships in super hybrid rice
  133. Special Issue on CleanWAS 2015
  134. Construction of a Genetic Linkage Map and QTL Analysis of Fruit-related Traits in an F1 Red Fuji x Hongrou Apple Hybrid
  135. Special Issue on CleanWAS 2015
  136. Effects of the Traditional Chinese Medicine Dilong on Airway Remodeling in Rats with OVA-induced-Asthma
  137. Special Issue on CleanWAS 2015
  138. The effect of sewage sludge application on the growth and absorption rates of Pb and As in water spinach
  139. Special Issue on CleanWAS 2015
  140. Effectiveness of mesenchymal stems cells cultured by hanging drop vs. conventional culturing on the repair of hypoxic-ischemic-damaged mouse brains, measured by stemness gene expression
Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/biol-2016-0040/html
Scroll to top button