Unlearning the boundary-crossing constraint: processing instruction and the acquisition of motion event construal

References

Alghamdi, Amani, Michael Daller & James Milton. 2019. The persistence of L1 patterns in SLA: The boundary crossing constraint and incidental learning. The Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 16. 81–106. https://doi.org/10.35869/vial.v0i16.94.Search in Google Scholar

Antonijević, Stanislava & Sarah Berthaud. 2009. Verbs of motion and sentence production in second language. In Proceedings of fechner day: Proceedings of the 25th annual meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics, vol. 25, 487–492. Galway, Ireland: International Society for Psychophysics. October 21–24, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Aske, Jon. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In Proceedings of the 15th Aannual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, vol. 1014. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v15i0.1753Search in Google Scholar

Attwood, Anthony. 2014. The teachability of entering and exiting in L2 English. Language Studies Working Papers 6. 43–52.Search in Google Scholar

Beavers, John, Beth Levin & Shiao Wei Tham. 2010. The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46(2). 331–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226709990272.Search in Google Scholar

Benati, Alessandro. 2005. The effects of processing instruction, traditional instruction and meaning-output instruction on the acquisition of the English past simple tense. Language Teaching Research 9(1). 67–93. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr154oa.Search in Google Scholar

Cadierno, Teresa. 2004. Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In Michel Achard & Susanne Niemeier (eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching, 13–49. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199857.13Search in Google Scholar

Cadierno, Teresa. 2008. Motion events in Danish and Spanish: A focus on form pedagogical approach. In Sabine De Knop, Teun De Rycker & René Dirven (eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar: a volume in honour of René Dirven, 259–294. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1515/9783110205381.3.259Search in Google Scholar

Cadierno, Teresa & Karen Lund. 2004. Cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition: Motion events in a typological framework. In Bill VanPatten, Jessica Williams, Susanne Rott & Mark Overstreet (eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition, 139–154. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Cadierno, Teresa & Peter Robinson. 2009. Language typology, task complexity and the development of L2 lexicalization patterns for describing motion events. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7. 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.10cad.Search in Google Scholar

Cadierno, Teresa & Lucas Ruiz. 2006. Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4(1). 183–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.4.08cad.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Liang & Jiansheng Guo. 2009. Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language. Journal of Pragmatics 41(9). 1749–1766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.015.Search in Google Scholar

Colasacco, Marina Anna. 2019. A cognitive approach to teaching deictic motion verbs to German and Italian students of Spanish. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 57(1). 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-2007.Search in Google Scholar

Corder, Stephen Pit. 1967. The significance of learner’s errors. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 5(1–4). 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161.Search in Google Scholar

Daller, Michael Helmut, Jeanine Treffers-Daller & Reyhan Furman. 2011. Transfer of conceptualization patterns in bilinguals: The construal of motion events in Turkish and German. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(1). 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728910000106.Search in Google Scholar

DeKeyser, Robert & Goretti Prieto Botana. 2014. The effectiveness of processing instruction in L2 grammar acquisition: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics 36(3). 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu071.Search in Google Scholar

Durlak, Joseph A. 2009. How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 34(9). 917–928. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp004.Search in Google Scholar

Fernández, Claudia. 2008. Reexamining the role of explicit information in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30(3). 277–305. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263108080467.Search in Google Scholar

Filipovic, Luna. 2007. Talking about motion: A cross-linguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.91Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1961. Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17(3). 241–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1961.11659756.Search in Google Scholar

Hendriks, Henriëtte & Maya Hickmann. 2015. Finding one’s path into another language: On the expression of boundary crossing by English learners of French. The Modern Language Journal 99(S1). 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2015.12176.x.Search in Google Scholar

Henry, Nicholas, Hillah Culman & Bill VanPatten. 2009. More on the effects of explicit information in instructed SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31(4). 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263109990027.Search in Google Scholar

Hickmann, Maya, Helen Engemann, Efstathia Soroli, Henriëtte Hendriks & Coralie Vincent. 2017. Expressing and categorizing motion in French and English: Verbal and non-verbal cognition across languages. In Ibarretxe-Antuñano Iraide (ed.), Motion and space across languages, 61–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.59.04hicSearch in Google Scholar

Kellerman, Eric. 1995. Cross-linguistic influence: Transfer to nowhere? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 15. 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190500002658.Search in Google Scholar

Larrañaga, Pilar, Jeanine Treffers-Daller, Françoise Tidball & Mari-Carmen Gil Ortega. 2012. L1 transfer in the acquisition of manner and path in Spanish by native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism 16(1). 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911405577.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1992. The lexical semantics of verbs of motion: The perspective from unaccusativity. In Iggy M. Roca (ed.), Thematic structure: Its role in grammar, 247–269. Berlin: Foris.10.1515/9783110872613.247Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. & David P. Wilkins. 2006. Patterns in the data: Towards a semantic typology of spatial description. In Stephen C. Levinson & David P. Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity, 512–552. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486753.015Search in Google Scholar

Marsden, Emma. 2006. Exploring input processing in the classroom: An experimental comparison of processing instruction and enriched input. Language Learning 56(3). 507–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00375.x.Search in Google Scholar

Marsden, Emma & Hsin‐Ying Chen. 2011. The roles of structured input activities in processing instruction and the kinds of knowledge they promote. Language Learning 61(4). 1058–1098. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00661.x.Search in Google Scholar

Morgan-Short, Kara & Harriet Bowden. 2006. Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction: Effects on second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(1). 31–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263106060025.Search in Google Scholar

Muñoz, Meritxell & Teresa Cadierno. 2019. Mr Bean exits the garage driving or does he drive out of the garage? Bidirectional transfer in the expression of path. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 57(1). 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-2006.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, John M. & Lourdes Ortega. 2000. Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50(3). 417–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136.Search in Google Scholar

Özçalışkan, Şeyda. 2015. Ways of crossing a spatial boundary in typologically distinct languages. Applied Psycholinguistics 36(2). 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000325.Search in Google Scholar

Özçalışkan, Şeyda & Dan I. Slobin. 2003. Codability effects on the expression of manner of motion in Turkish and English. In A. Sumru Özsoy, Didar Akar, Mine Nakipoğlu-Demiralp, Eser Erguvanlı-Taylan & Ayhan Aksu-Koç (eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics, 259–270. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 1996. Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18(1). 27–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100014674.Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 1996. From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 2003. Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought, 157–191. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4117.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. & Nini Hoiting. 1994. Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. In Proceedings of the twentieth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 487–505. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v20i1.1466Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Treffers-Daller, Jeanine. 2012. Thinking for speaking and linguistic relativity among bilinguals: Towards a new research agenda. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 3(2). 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.3.2.06tre.Search in Google Scholar

Treffers-Daller, Jeanine & Andreea Calude. 2015. The role of statistical learning in the acquisition of motion event construal in a second language. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18(5). 602–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1027146.Search in Google Scholar

Treffers-Daller, Jeanine & Françoise Tidball. 2016. Can L2 learners learn new ways to conceptualise events? Evidence from motion event construal among English-speaking learners of French. In Pedro Gujarro-Fuente, Natascha Müller & Katrin Schmitz (eds.), The acquisition of French in multilingual contexts, 145–184. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783094530-009Search in Google Scholar

VanPatten, Bill. 2004. Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.10.4324/9781410610195Search in Google Scholar

VanPatten, Bill. 2008. Processing matters in input enhancement. In Thorsten Piske & Martha Young-Scholten (eds.), Input matters, 47–61. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847691118-005Search in Google Scholar

VanPatten, Bill. 2015. Foundations of processing instruction. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 53(2). 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2015-0005.Search in Google Scholar

VanPatten, Bill & Teresa Cadierno. 1993. Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15(2). 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100011979.Search in Google Scholar

VanPatten, Bill & Soile Oikkenon. 1996. Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18(04). 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100015394.Search in Google Scholar

White, Lydia. 1991. Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research 7(2). 133–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839100700205.Search in Google Scholar

White, Justin. P. & Andrew J. DeMil. 2013. Transfer-of-training effects in processing instruction: The role of form-related explicit information. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35(3). 519–544. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263113000120.Search in Google Scholar

Wong, Wynne. 2004. The nature of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary, 33–63. N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Shu-Ling. 2011. Learning to express motion events in an L2: The case of Chinese directional complements. Language Learning 61(2). 414–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00614.x.Search in Google Scholar