The effects of extensive reading on young Korean students’ construction development

References

Anderson, John R. 2000. Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: W. H. Freeman.Search in Google Scholar

Ando, Sadao. 2008. Eigo no bunkei–Bunkei ga wakareba eigo ga wakaru [Sentence patterns of English: The understanding of sentence patterns leads to the understanding of English]. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Search in Google Scholar

Arnold, Jennifer E. 2010. How speakers refer: The role of accessibility. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(4). 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2010.00193.x.Search in Google Scholar

Beglar, David & Alan Hunt. 2014. Pleasure reading and reading rate gains. Reading in a Foreign Language 26. 29–48.Search in Google Scholar

Belcher, Diane D. & Alan Hirvela. 2001. Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading−writing connections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.11496Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, Jeremy K. & Adele E. Goldberg. 2009. Input effects within a constructionist framework. The Modern Language Journal 93. 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00899.x.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2008. Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In Peter Robinson & Nick C. Ellis (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, 216–236. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron-Faulkner, Thea, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello. 2003. A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science 27. 843–873. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2706_2.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Aimee L & Michael Tomasello. 2001. The acquisition of English dative constructions. Applied Psycholinguistics 22. 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716401002065.Search in Google Scholar

Crossley, Scott, Kristopher Kyle & Thomas Salsbury. 2016. A usage‐based investigation of L2 lexical acquisition: The role of input and output. The Modern Language Journal 100. 702–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12344.Search in Google Scholar

Day, Richard R. 2015. Extending extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language 27. 294–301.Search in Google Scholar

Day, Richard R. & Julian Bamford. 1998. Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1177/003368829802900211Search in Google Scholar

Day, Richard R. & Julian Bamford. 2002. Top ten principles for teaching extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language 14. 136–141.Search in Google Scholar

de Burgh-Hirabe, Ryoko & Anne Feryok. 2013. A model of motivation for extensive reading in Japanese as a foreign language. Reading in a Foreign Language 25. 72–93.Search in Google Scholar

Dodson, Kelly & Michael Tomasello. 1998. Acquiring the transitive construction in English: The role of animacy and pronouns. Journal of Child Language 25. 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000998003535.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24. 143–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263102002024.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C. & Fernando Ferreira-Junior. 2009. Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. Modern Language Journal 93. 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00896.x.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C. & Diane Larsen-Freeman. 2009. Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning 59. 90–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00537.x.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod, Shawn Loewen, Catherine Elder, Rosemary Erlam, Jenefer Philp & Hayo Reinders. 2009. Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C., Ute Römer & Matthew Brook O’Donnell. 2016. Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and processing: Cognitive and corpus investigations of construction grammar. Language learning monograph series. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone. Language 64. 501–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/414531.Search in Google Scholar

Fujimori, Chihiro. 2006. The effects of an extensive reading program on reading and listening comprehension among senior high school students. KATE Bulletin 20. 13–23.Search in Google Scholar

Garner, James, Scott Crossley & Kristopher Kyle. 2020. Beginning and intermediate L2 writer’s use of N-grams: An association measures study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 58. 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0089.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2019. Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.2307/j.ctvc772nnSearch in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E., Devin M. Casenhiser & Nitya Sethuraman. 2004. Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics 15. 289–316. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.011.Search in Google Scholar

Grabe, William. 2003. Reading and writing relations: Second language perspectives on research and practice. In Barbara Kroll (ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing, 242–262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524810.016Search in Google Scholar

Grabe, William. 2009. Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139150484Search in Google Scholar

Grabe, William & Fredricka L. Stoller. 2011. Teaching and researching: Reading, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1174Search in Google Scholar

Hoff, Erika, Stephanie Welsh, Silvia Place & Krystal Ribot. 2014. Properties of dual language input that shape bilingual development and properties of environments that shape dual language input. In Theres Grüter & Johanne Paradis (eds.), Input and experience in bilingual development, 119–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tilar.13.07hofSearch in Google Scholar

Horst, Marlise. 2009. Developing definitional vocabulary knowledge and lexical access speed through extensive reading. In Zhaohong Han & Neil J. Anderson (eds.), Second language reading: Research and instruction, 40–64. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Iwata, Akira. 2020. How extensively do we need to read to improve EFL reading ability? A comparison of two different instructional methodologies. The Reading Matrix 20. 66–83.Search in Google Scholar

Jeon, Eun-Young & Richard R. Day. 2016. The effectiveness of ER on reading proficiency: A meta-analysis. Reading in a Foreign Language 28. 246–265.Search in Google Scholar

Karami, Mehdi & Farzad Salahshoor. 2014. The relative significance of lexical richness and syntactic complexity as predictors of academic reading performance. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 3. 17–28.10.5861/ijrsll.2013.477Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Hyunwoo. 2016. The effects of accessibility of English reference in Korean EFL learners’ sentence processing. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics 167. 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.167.1.04kim.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Hyunwoo & Yangon Rah. 2016. Effects of verb semantics and proficiency in second language use of constructional knowledge. The Modern Language Journal 100. 716–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12345.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Hyunwoo & Yangon Rah. 2020. Applying constructionist approaches to teaching English argument structure constructions to EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3002 (Epub ahead of print).Search in Google Scholar

Kirin, Wilairat. 2010. Effects of extensive reading on students’ writing ability in an EFL class. The Journal of Asia TEFL 7. 285–308.Search in Google Scholar

Krashen, Stephen. 2001. More smoke and mirrors: A critique of the national reading panel report on fluency. Phi Delta Kappan 83. 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170108300208.Search in Google Scholar

Kyle, Kristopher & Scott Crossley. 2017. Assessing syntactic sophistication in L2 writing: A usage-based approach. Language Testing 34. 513–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217712554.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 2008. The relevance of cognitive grammar for language pedagogy. In Sabine De Knop & Teun De Rycker (eds.), Applications of cognitive linguistics 9: Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar, 7–35. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110205381.1.7Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Jin-Hwa & Hye Min Kim. 2011. The L2 developmental sequence of English constructions and underlying factors. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 11. 577–600.10.15738/kjell.11.3.201109.577Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Josephine Mijin & Eunseok Ro. 2020. “I actually picked up a physics textbook:” Complexities of the freedom principle in extensive reading. English Teaching 75. 3–23. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.75.1.202003.3.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Juhee & Diane Schallert. 2016. Exploring the reading–writing connection: A yearlong classroom‐based experimental study of middle school students developing literacy in a new language. Reading Research Quarterly 51. 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.132.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Juhee, Diane Schallert & Eonsil Kim. 2015. Effects of extensive reading and translation activities on grammar knowledge and attitudes for EFL adolescents. System 52. 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.016.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Siping & Jian Wang. 2015. Reading cooperatively or independently? Study on ELL student reading development. The Reading Matrix 15. 102–120.Search in Google Scholar

McLean, Stuart & Greg Rouault. 2017. The effectiveness and efficiency of extensive reading at developing reading rates. System 70. 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.003.Search in Google Scholar

Mezek, Špela. 2013. Multilingual reading proficiency in an emerging parallel-language environment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12. 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

Nakanishi, Takayuki. 2015. A meta-analysis of extensive reading research. TESOL Quarterly 49. 6–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.157.Search in Google Scholar

Ninio, Anat. 1999. Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language 26. 619–653. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000999003931.Search in Google Scholar

Nishino, Takako. 2007. Beginning to read extensively: A case study with Mako and Fumi. Reading in a Foreign Language 19. 76–105.Search in Google Scholar

Park, Jeongyeon. 2016. Integrating reading and writing through extensive reading. ELT Journal 70. 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv049.Search in Google Scholar

Park, A. Young. 2020. A comparison of the impact of extensive and intensive reading approaches on the reading attitudes of secondary EFL learners. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 10. 337–358. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.2.6.Search in Google Scholar

Peck, Richard. 2005. The reading-writing connection: Nobody but a reader ever became a writer. In Rebecca Olness (ed.), Using literature to enhance writing instruction, 1–9. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Search in Google Scholar

Perek, Florent & Adele E. Goldberg. 2017. Linguistic generalization on the basis of function and constraints on the basis of statistical preemption. Cognition 168. 276–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.019.Search in Google Scholar

Ro, Eunseok. 2016. Exploring teachers’ practices and students’ perceptions of extensive reading approach in EAP reading classes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 22. 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.01.006.Search in Google Scholar

Ro, Eunseok. 2018. Understanding reading motivation from EAP students’ categorical work in a focus group. TESOL Quarterly 52. 772–797. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.426.Search in Google Scholar

Robb, Thomas & Makimi Kano. 2013. Effective extensive reading outside the classroom: A large–scale experiment. Reading in a Foreign Language 25. 234–247.Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter & Nick C. Ellis. 2008. Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. Oxon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203938560Search in Google Scholar

Rodrigo, Victoria, Stephen Krashen & Barry Gribbons. 2004. The effectiveness of two comprehensible-input approaches to foreign language instruction at the intermediate level. System 32. 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2003.08.003.Search in Google Scholar

Rodrigo, Victoria, Daphne Greenberg & Don Segal. 2014. Changes in reading habits by low literate adults through extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language 26. 73–91.Search in Google Scholar

Römer, Ute, Matthew Brook O’Donnell & Nick C. Ellis. 2014. Second language learner knowledge of verb–argument constructions: Effects of language transfer and typology. Modern Language Journal 98. 952–975. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12149.Search in Google Scholar

Saito, Kazuya. 2017. Effects of sound, vocabulary, and grammar learning aptitude on adult second language speech attainment in foreign language classrooms. Language Learning 67. 665–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12244.Search in Google Scholar

Sakurai, Nobuko. 2017. The relationship between the amount of extensive reading and the writing performance. The Reading Matrix 17(2). 142–164.Search in Google Scholar

Snyder, William. 2001. On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation. Language 77. 324–342. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2001.0108.Search in Google Scholar

Song, Jayoung & Veronica Gabriela Sardegna. 2014. EFL learners’ incidental acquisition of English prepositions through enhanced extensive reading instruction. RELC Journal 45. 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214522623.Search in Google Scholar

Sung, Minchang & Hyun-Kwon Yang. 2016. Effects of construction-centered instruction on Korean students’ learning of English transitive resultative constructions. In Sabine De Knop & Gaëtanelle Gliquin (eds.), Applied construction grammar, 89–114. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.10.1515/9783110458268-005Search in Google Scholar

Theakston, Anna, Elena Lieven, Julian Pine & Caroline Rowland. 2001. The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb argument structure. Journal of Child Language 28. 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000900004608.Search in Google Scholar

Tode, Tomoko & Kyoko Otsuki. 2019. Measuring syntactic complexity of beginner-level EFL learners. Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan 30. 49–64.Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tummers, Jose, Kris Heylen & Dirk Geeraerts. 2005. Usage-based approaches in cognitive linguistics: A technical state of the art. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1. 225–261. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2005.1.2.225.Search in Google Scholar

Whong-Ваrr, Melinda. 2005. Morphology, derivational syntax and second language acquisition of resultatives. United Kingdom: Durham University Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Wulff, Stefanie, Nick C. Ellis, Ute Romer, Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig & Chelsea J. LeBlanc. 2009. The acquisition of tense–aspect: Converging evidence from corpora, cognition, and learner constructions. The Modern Language Journal 93. 354–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00895.x.Search in Google Scholar

Yamashita, Junko. 2013. Effects of extensive reading on reading attitudes in a foreign language. Reading in a Foreign Language 25. 248–263.Search in Google Scholar

Year, Jungeun & Peter Gordon. 2009. Korean speakers’ acquisition of the English ditransitive construction: The role of verb prototype, input distribution, and frequency. The Modern Language Journal 93. 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00898.x.Search in Google Scholar